SC 13E3/A
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 13E-3
(AMENDMENT NO. 1)
RULE 13e-3 TRANSACTION STATEMENT UNDER
SECTION 13(e)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
N.V. Koninklijke Nederlandsche Petroleum Maatschappij
(Name of the Issuer)
Royal Dutch Petroleum Company
(Translation of Issuers name into English)
Royal Dutch Shell plc
Shell Petroleum N.V.
Royal Dutch Petroleum Company
(Name of Person(s) Filing Statement)
Ordinary Shares of the nominal (par) value of 0.56 Euro
(0.56) each
(Title of Class of Securities)
780257804
(CUSIP Number of Class of Securities)
Michiel Brandjes
Company Secretary
Royal Dutch Shell plc
30, Carel van Bylandtaan
2596 HR The Hague
The Netherlands
+31 70 377 9111
(Name, Address, and Telephone Numbers of Person Authorized to
Receive
Notices and Communications on Behalf of Person Filing
Statement)
Copy to:
William P. Rogers, Jr., Esq.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
CityPoint, One Ropemaker Street
London EC2Y 9HR
United Kingdom
+44 207 453 1000
This statement is filed in connection with (check the
appropriate box):
|
|
|
|
|
a.
|
|
o
|
|
The filing of solicitation materials or an information statement
subject to Regulation 14A (§§240.14a-1 through
240.14b-2), Regulation 14C (§§240.14c-1 through
240.14c-101) or Rule 13e-3(c) (§240.13e-3(c)) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act). |
b.
|
|
o
|
|
The filing of a registration statement under the Securities Act
of 1933. |
c.
|
|
o
|
|
A tender offer. |
d.
|
|
þ
|
|
None of the above. |
Check the following box if the soliciting materials or
information statement referred to in checking box (a) are
preliminary copies: o
Check the following box if the filing is a final amendment
reporting the results of the transaction:
o
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of Filing Fee |
|
Transaction Valuation |
|
|
|
Amount of Filing Fee |
|
|
|
|
|
$1,950,173,939.98*
|
|
|
|
$229,535.47** |
|
|
* |
Calculated, solely for the purposes of determining the filing
fee, in accordance with Rule 0-11(b)(1) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Determined by
multiplying 31,140,057, the number of shares of Royal Dutch
Petroleum Company held by shareholders other than Royal Dutch
Shell plc, by
52.21, the price
to be paid for the shares held by such shareholders, using an
exchange rate of
1.1995$/, the
noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in foreign
currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York as of October 31, 2005. |
|
** |
The amount of the filing fee, calculated in accordance with
Rule 0-11 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and Fee Advisory #6 for Fiscal Year 2005, is equal to
0.01177% of the value of the transaction. |
Check the box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
§240.0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing with which the
offsetting fee was previously paid. Identify the previous filing
by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and
the date of its filing. þ
Amount previously paid: $229,535.47
Form or registration no.: Schedule 13E-3 (file no. 005-80496)
Filing Party: Royal Dutch Shell plc
Date Filed: November 3, 2005
This Amendment No. 1 to the Rule 13e-3 Transaction
Statement on Schedule 13E-3 amends and supplements the
Schedule 13E-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the SEC) by Royal Dutch Shell plc, a public company
limited by shares incorporated in England and Wales (Royal
Dutch Shell), and Shell Petroleum N.V., a company
organized under the laws of The Netherlands (Shell
Petroleum) with respect to the ordinary shares of the
nominal (par) value of 0.56 Euro
(0.56) each (the
Shares) of Royal Dutch Petroleum Company, a company
organized under the laws of The Netherlands (Royal
Dutch) on November 3, 2005 (as it may be amended or
supplemented from time to time, the
Schedule 13E-3). Capitalized terms used herein
but not defined in this Schedule 13E-3 shall have the
meanings given to them in the Disclosure Document attached as
Exhibit (a)(3)(A) to this Schedule 13E-3 (including all
schedules and annexes thereto, the Disclosure
Document).
Pursuant to General Instruction F to Schedule 13E-3,
the information contained in the Disclosure Document, including
all schedules and annexes thereto, is hereby expressly
incorporated herein by reference in response to items 1
through 15 of the Schedule 13E-3 and is supplemented
by the information specifically provided for herein.
|
|
Item 1. |
Summary Term Sheet (Regulation M-A
Item 1001). |
The information set forth in the section of the Disclosure
Document entitled Summary of the Proposed
Transaction is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 2. |
Subject Company Information (Regulation M-A
Item 1002). |
(a) Name and Address. The information set forth in
the section of the Disclosure Document entitled Companies
Involved Description of Royal Dutch and the Royal
Dutch Shares is incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Securities. As of November 14, 2005, Royal
Dutch had 2,069,520,000 ordinary shares outstanding (excluding
1,200,000 shares held by Royal Dutch).
(c) Trading Market and Price. The information set
forth in the section of the Disclosure Document entitled
Companies Involved Description of Royal Dutch
and the Royal Dutch Shares is incorporated herein by
reference.
(d) Dividends. The information set forth in the
section of the Disclosure Document entitled Companies
Involved Description of Royal Dutch and the Royal
Dutch Shares is incorporated herein by reference.
(e) Prior Public Offerings. Royal Dutch Shell, Shell
Petroleum and Royal Dutch have not made an underwritten public
offering of the Royal Dutch ordinary shares for cash during the
three years preceding the date of the filing of this
Schedule 13E-3.
(f) Prior Stock Purchases. The information set forth
in the sections of the Disclosure Document entitled
Companies Involved Interest of the Filing
Companies in Royal Dutch and Companies
Involved Description of Royal Dutch and the Royal
Dutch Shares is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 3. |
Identity and Background of Filing Person
(Regulation M-A Item 1003). |
(a) Name and Address. The information set forth in
the sections of the Disclosure Document entitled Companies
Involved Description of Royal Dutch Shell and Shell
Petroleum and Companies Involved
Description of Royal Dutch and the Royal Dutch Shares and
in Schedule I of the Disclosure Document is incorporated
herein by reference.
(b) Business and Background of Entities. The
information set forth in the sections of the Disclosure Document
entitled Companies Involved Description of
Royal Dutch Shell and Shell Petroleum and Companies
Involved Description of Royal Dutch and the Royal
Dutch Shares is incorporated herein by reference.
2
(c) Business and Background of Natural Persons. The
information set forth in the section of the Disclosure Document
entitled Companies Involved Description of
Royal Dutch Shell and Shell Petroleum Securities
Proceedings and Schedule I of the Disclosure Document
is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 4. |
Terms of the Transaction (Regulation M-A
Item 1004). |
(a) Material Terms. The information set forth in the
sections of the Disclosure Document entitled Summary of
the Proposed Transaction, Special Factors,
Companies Involved, The Proposed
Transaction and Certain U. S. Federal Income Tax and
Dutch Tax Consequences is incorporated herein by reference.
(c) Different Terms. The information set forth in
the sections of the Disclosure Document entitled Summary
of the Proposed Transaction, Special
Factors Purposes, Reasons, Fairness, Alternatives
and Effects of the Proposed Transaction and The
Proposed Transaction Overview of the Proposed
Transaction is incorporated herein by reference.
(d) Appraisal Rights. The information set forth in
the section of the Disclosure Document entitled The
Proposed Transaction Overview of the Proposed
Transaction is incorporated herein by reference.
(e) Provisions for Unaffiliated Security Holders.
The information set forth in the section of the Disclosure
Document entitled The Proposed Transaction
Overview of the Proposed Transaction is incorporated
herein by reference.
(f) Eligibility for Listing or Trading. Not
applicable.
|
|
Item 5. |
Past Contacts, Transactions, Negotiations and Agreements
(Regulation M-A Item 1005). |
(a) Transactions. The information set forth in the
section of the Disclosure Document entitled Companies
Involved Interest of the Filing Companies in Royal
Dutch and Schedule I of the Disclosure Document is
incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Significant Corporate Events. The information
set forth in the sections of the Disclosure Document entitled
Special Factors and Companies
Involved Interest of the Filing Companies in Royal
Dutch is incorporated herein by reference.
(c) Negotiations or Contacts. The information set
forth in the sections of the Disclosure Document entitled
Special Factors and Companies
Involved Interest of the Filing Companies in Royal
Dutch is incorporated herein by reference.
(e) Agreements Involving the Subject Companys
Securities. The information set forth in the sections of the
Disclosure Document entitled Special Factors and
The Proposed Transaction is incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
Item 6. |
Purposes of the Transaction and Plans or Proposals
(Regulation M-A Item 1006). |
(b) Use of Securities Acquired. The information set
forth in the sections of the Disclosure Document entitled
Special Factors Purposes, Reasons, Fairness,
Alternatives and Effects of the Proposed Transaction and
Special Factors Intentions of Royal Dutch
Shell with Regard to Royal Dutch and Shell Petroleum is
incorporated herein by reference.
(c) Plans. The information set forth in the sections
of the Disclosure Document entitled Summary of the
Proposed Transaction, Special Factors
Purposes, Reasons, Fairness, Alternatives and Effects of the
Proposed Transaction, Special Factors
Intentions of Royal Dutch Shell with Regard to Royal Dutch and
Shell Petroleum and The Proposed Transaction
is incorporated herein by reference. None of Royal Dutch Shell,
Shell Petroleum, Royal Dutch or any person listed in
Schedule I of the Disclosure Document has any plans except
as described in the information incorporated by reference.
3
|
|
Item 7. |
Purposes, Alternatives, Reasons and Effects
(Regulation M-A Item 1013). |
(a) Purposes. The information set forth in the
sections of the Disclosure Document entitled Summary of
the Proposed Transaction and Special
Factors Purposes, Reasons, Fairness, Alternatives
and Effects of the Proposed Transaction is incorporated
herein by reference.
(b) Alternatives. The information set forth in the
sections of the Disclosure Document entitled Summary of
the Proposed Transaction and Special
Factors Purposes, Reasons, Fairness, Alternatives
and Effects of the Proposed Transaction is incorporated
herein by reference.
(c) Reasons. The information set forth in the
sections of the Disclosure Document entitled Summary of
the Proposed Transaction and Special
Factors Purposes, Reasons, Fairness, Alternatives
and Effects of the Proposed Transaction is incorporated
herein by reference.
(d) Effects. The information set forth in the
sections of the Disclosure Document entitled Summary of
the Proposed Transaction, Special
Factors Purposes, Reasons, Fairness, Alternatives
and Effects of the Proposed Transaction, Special
Factors Intentions of Royal Dutch Shell with Regard
to Royal Dutch and Shell Petroleum and Certain U.S.
Federal Income Tax and Dutch Tax Consequences is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 8. |
Fairness of the Transaction (Regulation M-A
Item 1014). |
(a) Fairness. The information set forth in the
sections of the Disclosure Document entitled Special
Factors Background of the Proposed
Transaction, Special Factors Purposes,
Reasons, Fairness, Alternatives and Effects of the Proposed
Transaction Position on the Fairness of the Proposed
Transaction and Special Factors Certain
Opinions and Reports is incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Factors Considered in Determining Fairness. The
information set forth in the sections of the Disclosure Document
entitled Special Factors Purposes, Reasons,
Fairness, Alternatives and Effects of the Proposed
Transaction Position on the Fairness of the Proposed
Transaction and Special Factors Certain
Opinions and Reports is incorporated herein by reference.
(c) Approval of Security Holders. The information
set forth in the section of the Disclosure Document entitled
Special Factors Purposes, Reasons, Fairness,
Alternatives and Effects of the Proposed Transaction
Position on the Fairness of the Proposed Transaction is
incorporated herein by reference.
(d) Unaffiliated Representatives. The information
set forth in the section of the Disclosure Document entitled
Special Factors Background of the Proposed
Transaction is incorporated herein by reference.
(e) Approval of Directors. The information set forth
in the section of the Disclosure Document entitled Special
Factors Background of the Proposed Transaction
is incorporated herein by reference.
(f) Other Offers. The information set forth in the
section of the Disclosure Document entitled Special
Factors Background of the Proposed Transaction
is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 9. |
Reports, Opinions, Appraisals and Negotiations
(Regulation M-A Item 1015). |
(a) Report, Opinion or Appraisals. The information
set forth in the section of the Disclosure Document entitled
Special Factors Certain Opinions and
Reports is incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Preparer and Summary of the Report. The
information set forth in the section of the Disclosure Document
entitled Special Factors Certain Opinions and
Reports is incorporated herein by reference.
(c) Availability of Documents. The information set
forth in the sections of the Disclosure Document entitled
Special Factors Certain Opinions and
Reports, The Proposed Transaction
Overview of the Proposed Transaction and Additional
Information is incorporated herein by reference.
4
|
|
Item 10. |
Source and Amounts of Funds or Other Consideration
(Regulation M-A Item 1007). |
(a) Source of Funds. The information set forth in
the section of the Disclosure Document entitled The
Proposed Transaction Source and Amount of
Funds is incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Conditions. Not applicable.
(c) Expenses. The information set forth in the
section of the Disclosure Document entitled The Proposed
Transaction Transaction Expenses is
incorporated herein by reference.
(d) Borrowed Funds. Not applicable.
|
|
Item 11. |
Interest in Securities of the Subject Company
(Regulation M-A Item 1008). |
(a) Securities Ownership. The information set forth
in the section of the Disclosure Document entitled
Companies Involved is incorporated herein by
reference.
(b) Securities Transactions. The information set
forth in the section of the Disclosure Document entitled
Companies Involved Interest of the Filing
Companies in Royal Dutch is incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
Item 12. |
The Solicitation or Recommendation (Regulation M-A
Item 1012). |
(d) Intent to Tender or Vote in a Going Private
Transaction. Not applicable.
(e) Recommendations of Others. Not Applicable.
|
|
Item 13. |
Financial Statements (Regulation M-A
Item 1010). |
(a) Financial Information. The audited financial
statements of Royal Dutch for the three years ending
December 31, 2004 and the unaudited financial statements of
Royal Dutch for the nine months ending September 30, 2004
and September 30, 2005, each of which is attached as an
exhibit to the Disclosure Document, are incorporated herein by
reference. The information set forth in the section of the
Disclosure Document entitled Companies
Involved Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Net
Book Value is incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Pro Forma Information. Not applicable.
|
|
Item 14. |
Persons/Assets, Retained, Employed, Compensated or Used
(Regulation M-A Item 1009). |
(a) Solicitations or Recommendations. The
information set forth in the section of the Disclosure Document
entitled Miscellaneous is incorporated herein by
reference.
(b) Employees and Corporate Assets. The information
set forth in the section of the Disclosure Document entitled
Miscellaneous is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 15. |
Additional Information (Regulation M-A
Item 1011). |
(b) Other Material Information. The Disclosure
Document in its entirety is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 16. |
Exhibits (Regulation M-A Item 1016). |
Item 16 of the Schedule 13E-3 is hereby amended and supplemented
by replacing Exhibit (a)(3)(A) with Exhibit (a)(3)(A) attached
to this Amendment No. 1.
(a)(3)(A) Disclosure Document, dated November 14, 2005.
5
SIGNATURE
After due inquiry and to the best of my knowledge and belief,
the undersigned certify that the information set forth in this
statement is true, complete and correct.
Dated: November 14, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Michiel Brandjes |
|
Title: Company Secretary |
|
|
SHELL PETROLEUM N.V. |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Michiel Brandjes |
|
Title: Attorney-in-Fact |
|
|
ROYAL DUTCH PETROLEUM COMPANY |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Michiel Brandjes |
|
Title: Attorney-in-Fact |
6
(evidence of signing authority with respect to Shell
Petroleum N.V.)
Extract of the MINUTES of the meeting of the
board of management of SHELL PETROLEUM N.V.
|
|
|
(Board of Management or
Board) held on Wednesday 26 October,
2005, at the office of the company, Carel van Bylandtaan 30, The
Hague. |
[...]
The majority of the Board of Management were present or
represented, and were empowered to take decisions by virtue of
Articles 13, 14 and 16 of the Articles of Association. The
Board appointed M.C.M. Brandjes as secretary of the meeting.
Resolutions
|
|
|
The appointment of Mr M.C.M. Brandjes as person authorised to
make any and all filings, deposits and other administrative
actions in relation or pursuant to the Implementation Agreement
and any and all other related documents required to effect the
Unwind, is hereby approved. |
[...]
Any other business
There being no other business, the Chairman closed the meeting.
|
|
|
Certified as true extract of minutes |
|
of the above meeting |
|
|
/s/ M.C.M. Brandjes |
|
|
|
M.C.M. Brandjes |
|
Secretary of meeting |
7
ANNEX II
(evidence of signing authority with respect to Royal Dutch
Petroleum Company)
Extract of the MINUTES of the meeting of the
board of management of N.V. KONINKLIJKE
|
|
|
NEDERLANDSCHE PETROLEUM MAATSCHAPPIJ (Royal Dutch Petroleum
Company) (Board of Management or
Board) held on Wednesday 26 October, 2005, at
the office of the company, Carel van Bylandtlaan 30, The Hague. |
[...]
The majority of the Board of Management were present or
represented, and were empowered to take decisions by virtue of
Articles 13, 14 and 16 of the Articles of Association. The
Board appointed M.C.M. Brandjes as secretary of the meeting.
[...]
Resolutions
[...]
|
|
|
The appointment of Mr M.C.M. Brandjes as person authorised to
make any and all filings, deposits and other administrative
actions in relation or pursuant to the Implementation Agreement
and any and all other related documents required to effect the
Unwind, is hereby approved. |
[...]
Any other business
|
|
|
There being no other business, the Chairman closed the meeting. |
|
|
|
Certified as true extract of minutes |
|
of the above meeting |
|
|
/s/ M.C.M. Brandjes |
|
|
|
M.C.M. Brandjes |
|
Secretary of meeting |
8
Exhibit Index
(a)(3)(A) Disclosure Document, dated November 14, 2005.
9
EX-(A)(3)(A)
This Disclosure Document is being provided to shareholders
of
Royal Dutch Petroleum Company in order to comply with
applicable U.S. securities laws.
Disclosure Document
Relating to Merger
of
Royal Dutch Petroleum Company
(N.V. Koninklijke Nederlandsche Petroleum Maatschappij)
with
Shell Petroleum N.V.
an indirect subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell plc
The proposed merger of the Royal Dutch Petroleum Company
(Royal Dutch) with Shell Petroleum N.V. (Shell
Petroleum) in which holders of the outstanding ordinary
shares of nominal (par) value of Euro 0.56
(0.56) in the
share capital of Royal Dutch (the Royal Dutch
Shares), other than Royal Dutch Shell plc (Royal
Dutch Shell), will receive cash (or in the case of
eligible UK resident shareholders who so elect, exchangeable
loan notes), is subject to the filing, dissemination and
disclosure requirements of Rule 13e-3 under the
U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). This Disclosure Document is being
provided to holders of Royal Dutch Shares in order to comply
with Rule 13e-3. Through the transaction described herein,
Royal Dutch Shell expects to own all of the interests in Royal
Dutch and the existing minority holders of Royal Dutch Shares
would be entitled to receive the Merger Consideration of
52.21 per
share described herein. Royal Dutch Shell beneficially owns an
aggregate of 2,038,380,043 Royal Dutch Shares, which represent
approximately 98.5% of the Royal Dutch Shares outstanding.
Neither the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) nor any securities commission of any state of
the United States of America has approved or disapproved of this
transaction or passed upon the fairness or merits of this
transaction or upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information
contained in this document. Any representation to the contrary
is a criminal offense.
This Disclosure Document is not an offer to purchase loan
notes, Royal Dutch Shell shares or Royal Dutch Shares. The loan
notes, and the Royal Dutch Shell shares for which they may be
exchanged, are only available to eligible UK resident
shareholders who so elect and give appropriate representations.
The loan notes and such Royal Dutch Shell shares are not offered
and will not be issued in the United States or to
U.S. persons and have not been and will not be registered
under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Securities Act), and may not be reoffered, resold or
otherwise transferred in the United States or to
U.S. persons unless an exemption from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act is available.
The loan notes, and the Royal Dutch Shell shares for which
they may be exchanged, are not offered to persons who are
established, domiciled or resident in The Netherlands. Shell
Petroleum N.V. as issuer of the loan notes has submitted a
statement to The Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets
that the laws and regulations of the jurisdiction in which the
loan notes are offered have been and will be complied with.
The date of this Disclosure Document is November 14, 2005.
General Information
In this Disclosure Document:
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Holders means, collectively, all of the
holders of Royal Dutch Shares other than Royal Dutch Shell and
Royal Dutch. |
|
|
|
Royal Dutch Shell refers to Royal Dutch Shell plc, a
public company incorporated in England and Wales. |
|
|
|
Royal Dutch refers to N.V. Koninklijke Nederlandsche
Petroleum Maatschappij (also known as Royal Dutch Petroleum
Company), a company organized under the laws of The Netherlands. |
|
|
|
the Shell Group means, collectively, Royal Dutch
Shell and its subsidiaries and subsidiary undertakings. |
|
|
|
Shell Petroleum refers to Shell Petroleum N.V., a
company organized under the laws of The Netherlands. |
|
|
|
Shell Transport refers to The Shell Transport and
Trading Company Limited (previously known as The
Shell Transport and Trading Company, p.l.c.), a
company incorporated in England and Wales. |
|
|
|
SPCo refers to The Shell Petroleum Company Limited,
a company incorporated in England and Wales. |
|
|
|
U.S. dollars or $ refers to
U.S. currency, pounds sterling,
£ or pence refers to UK currency,
and euro or
refers to the currency established for participating member
states of the European Union as of the beginning of stage three
of the European Monetary Union on January 1, 1999. |
Certain other terms are defined in other sections of this
Disclosure Document.
All references to the percentage ownership of Royal Dutch Shell
of Royal Dutch Shares in this Disclosure Document are based on
2,069,520,000 Royal Dutch Shares currently outstanding
(excluding 1,200,000 shares held by Royal Dutch).
Forward-Looking Statements
The SEC encourages companies to disclose forward-looking
information so that investors can better understand a
companys future prospects and make informed investment
decisions. This Disclosure Document contains historical and
forward-looking statements concerning the financial condition,
results of operations and businesses of Royal Dutch Shell, Royal
Dutch, Shell Petroleum and the Shell Group. All statements other
than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be,
forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectations
that are based on managements current expectations and
assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or
events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in
these statements. Forward-looking statements include, among
other things, statements concerning the potential exposure of
Royal Dutch Shell, Royal Dutch, Shell Petroleum or the Shell
Group to market risks and statements expressing
managements expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts,
projections and assumptions. These forward-looking statements
are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as
anticipate, believe, could,
estimate, expect, intend,
may, plan, objectives,
outlook, probably, project,
will, seek, target,
risks, goals, should and
similar terms and phrases.
The following factors could affect the future operations of
Royal Dutch Shell, Royal Dutch or the Shell Group and could
cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in
the forward-looking statements included in this Disclosure
Document:
|
|
|
|
|
the failure to fulfill any conditions of, and/or the failure to
obtain any necessary consents and approvals necessary in order
to consummate, the Proposed Transaction; |
|
|
|
the failure of the Proposed Transaction to achieve the expected
benefits; |
|
|
|
the costs related to the Proposed Transaction; and |
|
|
|
other factors affecting the Shell Groups businesses
generally, including, but not limited to, price fluctuations in
crude oil, natural gas and refined products, changes in demand
for the Shell Groups products, currency fluctuations,
drilling and production results, reserve estimates, loss of
market, industry competition, environmental risks, physical
risks, risks associated with the identification of suitable
potential acquisition properties and targets and successful
negotiation and consummation of such transactions, the risk of
doing business in developing countries and countries subject to
international sanctions, legislative, fiscal and regulatory
developments including potential litigation and regulatory
effects arising from recategorization of reserves, economic and
financial market conditions in various countries and regions,
political risks, project delay or advancement, approvals and
cost estimates. |
All forward-looking statements contained in this Disclosure
Document are expressly qualified in their entirety by the
cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section.
You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the
date of the particular statement. None of Royal Dutch Shell,
Royal Dutch, Shell Petroleum or any member of the Shell Group
undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future
events or other information. In light of these risks, results
could differ materially from the forward-looking statements
contained in this Disclosure Document.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
I. SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED
TRANSACTION
The summary that follows highlights important information about
the effect on the Minority Holders of the proposed merger of
Royal Dutch with Shell Petroleum. This proposed merger forms
part of a series of transactions that would reorganize the
ownership interests of Royal Dutch Shell and certain of its
subsidiaries into a Dutch fiscal group and a UK fiscal group.
This summary is, however, intended to be an overview only. For a
more complete description of the proposed restructuring
transactions, you should read carefully this entire Disclosure
Document, and the related documents described in this Disclosure
Document, including any accompanying documents, because this
summary may not answer all of your questions.
The Proposed Transaction
|
|
|
What is the Proposed Transaction? |
Royal Dutch Shell proposes to engage in certain transactions
that would reorganize the ownership interests of Royal Dutch
Shell and certain of its subsidiaries into a Dutch fiscal group
and a UK fiscal group. As part of these transactions, Royal
Dutch will merge into Shell Petroleum through a statutory merger
under Dutch law (the Merger) on a basis whereby each
Minority Holder would be entitled to receive the Merger
Consideration described below per Royal Dutch Share held by such
holder immediately prior to the Merger. These transactions,
including the Merger, are referred to herein as the
Proposed Transaction.
As described below, the Proposed Transaction is expected to be
completed on or about December 21, 2005.
For more information, see Section IV, The Proposed
Transaction.
|
|
|
What effect will the Merger have on Royal Dutch and my
Royal Dutch Shares? |
Upon completion of the Merger, Shell Petroleum will be the
surviving entity and Royal Dutch and, therefore, the Royal Dutch
Shares, will cease to exist. Due to this, trading of the Royal
Dutch Shares will cease, the registration of the Royal Dutch
Shares under the Exchange Act will be terminated and Shell
Petroleum, as the successor of Royal Dutch, will not be subject
to the periodic reporting obligations of the Exchange Act or
otherwise be subject to the U.S. Federal securities laws
applicable to public companies.
Under the terms of the Merger, Royal Dutch Shell will be
allotted 105 Class A shares of Shell Petroleum, being one
Class A share for every 31,978,937 Royal Dutch Shares held
by it, and thereafter one Class B share of Shell Petroleum
for 28,521,530 Royal Dutch Shares held by it (the ratio of
allotment of Royal Dutch Shares to Shell Petroleum Class A
shares to Shell Petroleum Class B share is referred to
herein as the Exchange Ratio). As the Minority
Holders collectively hold less than 31,978,937 Royal Dutch
Shares, each of them only has a fractional
entitlement to a Shell Petroleum share. Under Dutch law,
holders of fractional entitlements in a statutory merger are
only entitled to receive financial consideration rather than
shares. The Proposed Transaction is structured, and the Exchange
Ratio was determined, so that Royal Dutch Shell would receive
shares in Shell Petroleum and all Minority Holders would be
entitled to fractional entitlements.
For more information on the effect of the Merger, see
Section II.3(d), Special Factors
Purposes, Reasons, Fairness, Alternatives and Effects of the
Proposed Transaction Effects of the Proposed
Transaction and Section IV.1, The Proposed
Transaction Overview of the Proposed
Transaction.
|
|
|
What will I receive for my Royal Dutch Shares? |
Each Minority Holder will be entitled to receive for their Royal
Dutch Shares cash equivalent to
52.21 per Royal
Dutch Share (the Merger Consideration). Holders of
Royal Dutch Shares on the applicable record date will also
receive the Royal Dutch interim dividend for the third quarter
of 2005 of 0.46
per share (or $0.5556 per share for holders of New York
registered shares), which will be payable on December 15,
2005.
As in Dutch statutory squeeze out proceedings, the terms of the
Merger provide (a) for interest to accrue on the Merger
Consideration at the statutory rate of 4% per annum from
October 31, 2005 until the effective date of the Merger
(expected to be December 21, 2005), as part of the
consideration under the Merger, and (b) for any dividends
payable in that period (before the deduction of any withholding
tax from such dividend) to be deducted
1
from that interest amount (the sum being, Interest).
As the interim dividend will exceed the amount of interest
accrued at 4% per annum to December 21, 2005 (the expected
effective date of the Merger), no Interest is expected to be
payable.
Payments to holders of New York registered shares will be made
in U.S. dollars based on the noon buying rate for euro in
the City of New York for cable transfers as certified for
customs purposes and as announced by the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York on the business day prior to the effective date of the
Merger (which is expected to be December 21, 2005).
Payments to holders of Hague registered or bearer shares will be
made in euro. Minority Holders that are eligible UK residents
and that have given appropriate representations will be entitled
to elect to receive certain exchangeable loan notes in lieu of
the aggregate Merger Consideration such holders would otherwise
receive. Eligible holders who so elect will also be entitled to
receive payment of the interim dividend and Interest, if any.
Information regarding the exchangeable loan notes will be
separately made available to eligible UK resident holders.
|
|
|
Has Royal Dutch taken a position with respect to the
Proposed Transaction? |
The Board of Royal Dutch has unanimously reached the conclusion,
on the basis of the considerations described in this Disclosure
Document, that the Proposed Transaction is fair to and in the
best interest of Royal Dutch and the enterprise associated with
Royal Dutch and is fair to the Minority Holders. The Board of
Royal Dutch has received a written opinion dated
October 31, 2005 from its financial advisor, ABN AMRO Bank
N.V. (ABN AMRO) that, as at October 31, 2005,
based upon and subject to matters considered, assumptions used
and qualifications set forth therein, the Exchange Ratio and the
Merger Consideration pursuant thereto are fair, from a financial
point of view, to the Minority Holders who will receive the
Merger Consideration in the Merger.
For more information about the fairness of the Proposed
Transaction to the Minority Holders, see Section II.3(b),
Special Factors Purposes, Reasons, Fairness,
Alternatives and Effects of the Proposed Transaction
Position on the Fairness of the Proposed Transaction and
Section II.4, Special Factors Certain
Opinions and Reports.
|
|
|
How will I receive the Merger Consideration? |
Payment of the Merger Consideration (and Interest, if any) will
be made by Shell Petroleum.
For New York registered Royal Dutch Shares held through a bank
or broker account utilizing the Depository Trust Company as
custodian, payment will be made to the Depository Trust Company
for further credit to each bank or broker account through which
such Shares are held.
For New York registered Royal Dutch Shares (other than those
holding through a bank or broker account utilizing the
Depository Trust Company as custodian), payment will be made to
the account indicated by each Minority Holder in the Letter of
Transmittal which will be sent to all holders of New York
registered Royal Dutch Shares. Minority Holders of New York
registered Royal Dutch Shares will be required to surrender
their share certificates to receive payment. Instructions for
surrendering share certificates will be set forth in such Letter
of Transmittal.
For Royal Dutch Shares in bearer form which are held through the
Dutch central securities depositary, Euroclear Nederland
(Euroclear Nederland), payment will be made to
Euroclear Nederland which will distribute the funds to Minority
Holders through its member institutions on the basis of the
terms and conditions for such institutions.
For Hague registered Royal Dutch Shares, payment of the Merger
Consideration will be made to the account most recently
indicated by each Minority Holder for the payment of dividends.
Minority Holders of Hague registered Royal Dutch Shares who have
not given account information, or who have given inaccurate
account information, will receive payment upon providing
evidence of ownership and information which allows Shell
Petroleum to make payment.
For Royal Dutch Shares in bearer form which are untraceable and
for Royal Dutch Shares in bearer form represented by bearer
certificates provided with separate dividend coupons
(K-certificates or
K-stukken),
2
payment will be made upon the presentation of the certificates
representing such shares: (i) for the period commencing on
the effective date of the Merger (which is expected to be
December 21, 2005) and ending December 31, 2006, to
ABN AMRO, Issuing Institutions Corporate Actions MF
2020, Kemelstede 2, 4817 ST Breda, The Netherlands;
and (ii) for the period commencing on January 1, 2007
until the twentieth anniversary of the effective date of the
Merger, to the registered address of Shell Petroleum in The
Netherlands (currently, Carel van Bylandtlaan 30, 2596 HR
The Hague, The Netherlands).
After the twentieth anniversary of the effective date of the
Merger, all rights to receive the Merger Consideration (and
Interest, if any) will be forfeited.
In the case of eligible UK resident Minority Holders electing to
receive exchangeable loan notes, such loan notes will be issued
in the manner described in the information made available to
such holders.
|
|
|
What are the conditions to the Proposed
Transaction? |
Pursuant to an implementation agreement (the
Implementation Agreement) among Royal Dutch, Shell
Petroleum, Royal Dutch Shell, Shell Transport and SPCo, the
completion of the Proposed Transaction is subject to certain
conditions, including the requirement for the adoption of
certain resolutions to be passed at a Royal Dutch Extraordinary
General Meeting (EGM). Royal Dutch Shell intends to
vote its entire shareholding interest (approximately 98.5%) in
favor of these resolutions and, accordingly, these resolutions
can be adopted without the vote of the Minority Holders. If the
Proposed Transaction is not completed before January 1,
2006, the Implementation Agreement may be terminated by Royal
Dutch Shell or Royal Dutch.
For more information, see Section IV.2, The Proposed
Transaction Conditions to the Proposed
Transaction.
|
|
|
When is the EGM and when is the Proposed Transaction
expected to be completed? |
Royal Dutch will convene the EGM for December 16, 2005, at
2.00 pm Central European time, at Carel van
Bylandtlaan 16, 2596 HR The Hague, The Netherlands.
Shareholders of Royal Dutch will separately be provided notice
of the EGM and proxy materials in accordance with Dutch
requirements and applicable New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) requirements.
The Proposed Transaction is expected to be completed on or about
December 21, 2005.
For more information, see Section IV.1, The Proposed
Transaction Overview of the Proposed
Transaction.
Background of Royal Dutch Shell and Shell Petroleum
|
|
|
What is the relationship between Royal Dutch Shell, Royal
Dutch and Shell Petroleum? |
Royal Dutch Shell is a public company limited by shares
incorporated in England and Wales. As a result of the
Unification Transaction (as defined below), Royal Dutch Shell
became the parent company of Royal Dutch, Shell Transport and
Shell Petroleum.
Royal Dutch is a company organized under the laws of The
Netherlands. As a result of the Unification Transaction (as
defined below), Royal Dutch Shell owns approximately 98.5% of
the outstanding Royal Dutch Shares.
Shell Petroleum, a company organized under the laws of The
Netherlands, is wholly owned by Royal Dutch and Shell Transport
in the ratio of 60:40.
As part of the Proposed Transaction, Royal Dutch will merge into
Shell Petroleum, with Royal Dutch disappearing and Shell
Petroleum surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Royal Dutch
Shell.
For more information, see the description of Royal Dutch Shell
and Shell Petroleum in Section III.1, Companies
Involved Description of Royal Dutch Shell and Shell
Petroleum and the description of Royal Dutch in
Section III.2, Companies Involved
Description of Royal Dutch and the Royal Dutch Shares.
3
|
|
|
How did Royal Dutch Shell acquire such Royal Dutch
Shares? |
On July 20, 2005, Royal Dutch Shell became the parent
company of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport and, through Royal
Dutch and Shell Transport, the Shell Group following
(a) the registration by the Registrar of Companies in
England and Wales of the order of the High Court of Justice in
England and Wales sanctioning the scheme of arrangement of Shell
Transport under English law (the Scheme) and
(b) Royal Dutch Shells confirmation that the exchange
offer (the Exchange Offer, and, together with the
Scheme, the Unification Transaction) for all of the
Royal Dutch Shares, commenced on May 19, 2005, had become
unconditional (gestanddoening). As a result of the
Exchange Offer, including the subsequent offer acceptance
period, Royal Dutch Shell acquired, and currently holds,
approximately 98.5% of the outstanding Royal Dutch Shares.
For more information regarding Royal Dutch Shells
acquisition of these Royal Dutch Shares, see Section II.1,
Special Factors Background of the Unification
Transaction.
Purpose of the Proposed Transaction
|
|
|
What is the purpose of the Proposed Transaction? |
The primary purpose of the Proposed Transaction is to achieve
governance, management, and fiscal efficiencies for the Shell
Group. The Merger will simplify the organizational structure of
the Shell Group and eliminate the potential investor confusion
of having, and the duplicative and administrative burdens
associated with maintaining, two publicly held holding companies
in the Shell Group. The Proposed Transaction will also allow the
Shell Group to realize overall tax efficiencies for 2005 and
thereafter by unifying the Dutch tax resident companies into one
Dutch fiscal group and the UK tax resident companies into
another fiscal group. In particular, completion of the Merger in
2005 will allow for tax consolidation of Royal Dutch and Shell
Petroleum under Dutch law from January 1, 2005. If the
Proposed Transaction is not completed before January 1,
2006, the Implementation Agreement may be terminated by Royal
Dutch Shell or Royal Dutch.
The Merger will also allow Royal Dutch Shell to acquire 100% of
the interests in Royal Dutch as contemplated in the Unification
Transaction, on a basis that is likely to be less time consuming
and procedurally more efficient than the implementation of
statutory squeeze out proceedings under Dutch law. Royal Dutch
Shell has resolved to initiate statutory squeeze out proceedings
in relation to Royal Dutch, if for any reason it should be
impossible to complete the Merger. A squeeze out would result in
all Minority Holders receiving a cash payment in exchange for
their Royal Dutch Shares. An additional benefit of the Merger
compared with Dutch statutory squeeze out proceedings is that it
allows the offer of exchangeable loan notes to eligible UK
resident Minority Holders.
For more information regarding the purposes of the Proposed
Transaction, see Section II.3(a), Special
Factors Purposes, Reasons, Fairness, Alternatives
and Effects of the Proposed Transaction Purposes and
Reasons.
Financing of the Proposed Transaction
|
|
|
Does Shell Petroleum have available the financial
resources necessary to make payment for the outstanding Royal
Dutch Shares? |
Shell Petroleum has available sufficient funds to pay the Merger
Consideration for all outstanding Royal Dutch Shares held by the
Minority Holders. The total amount of funds that may be required
to pay the Merger Consideration is approximately
1.6 billion
or approximately $1.9 billion based on the noon buying rate
as of November 10, 2005 (assuming all Minority Holders
receive cash).
For more information about the financing of the Proposed
Transaction described in this Disclosure Document, see
Section IV.3, The Proposed Transaction
Source and Amount of Funds.
4
Tax Consequences
|
|
|
How will U.S. shareholders be taxed for
U.S. Federal income tax purposes? |
A U.S. holder will recognize capital gain or loss upon the
Merger in an amount equal to the difference between the amount
of Merger Consideration and such U.S. holders
adjusted tax basis in the Royal Dutch Shares.
|
|
|
How will Dutch shareholders be taxed for Dutch tax
purposes? |
Capital gains realized by Dutch individuals on the disposition
of Royal Dutch Shares will generally not be subject to Dutch
taxation. However, capital gains realized by Dutch entities on
the disposition of Royal Dutch Shares will generally be subject
to Dutch corporate income tax at statutory rates.
You
are urged to consult your own tax advisor as to the particular
tax consequences to you of the disposition of your Royal Dutch
Shares.
For more information regarding the U.S. Federal income tax
and Dutch tax consequences of the offer to U.S. and Dutch
taxpayers, see Section V, Certain U.S. Federal
Income Tax and Dutch Tax Consequences.
General
|
|
|
Why am I receiving this Disclosure Document? |
You are receiving this Disclosure Document because the Proposed
Transaction described in this Disclosure Document is expected to
cause there to be fewer than 300 holders of record of Royal
Dutch Shares and result in deregistering the Royal Dutch Shares
under the Exchange Act. Royal Dutch Shell, Shell Petroleum and
Royal Dutch are therefore required by applicable
U.S. Federal securities laws in connection with the
Proposed Transaction to provide this Disclosure Document to the
Minority Holders.
|
|
|
Where can I obtain additional information? |
Additional information relating to the Proposed Transaction may
be found on www.shell.com/royaldutchmerger. Neither the website,
nor its content, is incorporated by reference herein. The SEC
also maintains an internet website that contains reports and
other information about issuers, such as Royal Dutch, who file
electronically with the SEC. The address of that website is
www.sec.gov.
If you have further questions about the Proposed Transaction,
you should contact:
|
|
|
|
|
If your Royal Dutch Shares are held on the New York register,
please contact The Bank of New York by telephone on
+1 888 737 2377 or, if you are outside the United
States, on +1 212 815 3700. |
|
|
|
If you hold your Royal Dutch Shares through a financial
institution affiliated with Euroclear Nederland or if you hold
K-certificates, please contact your bank or broker or,
alternatively, ABN AMRO Bank N.V. by telephone on
+31 (0)20 383 6707 or by email at:
prospectus@nl.abnamro.com. |
|
|
|
If your Royal Dutch Shares are held in your name on the The
Hague register, please contact N.V. Algemeen Nederlands
Trustkantoor ANT by telephone on
+31 (0)20 522 2510 or by email at:
registers@ant-trust.nl. |
See Section VII, Additional Information, for
further details.
II. SPECIAL FACTORS
1. Background of the Unification
Transaction
Royal Dutch Shell recently completed the Unification Transaction
as a result of which Royal Dutch Shell became the single
ultimate parent company of Royal Dutch, Shell Transport and
their subsidiaries. The Unification Transaction involved
(i) the Exchange Offer in which Royal Dutch Shell acquired
approximately 98.5% of the outstanding Royal Dutch Shares in
exchange for Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares and
5
(ii) the Scheme pursuant to which Royal Dutch Shell became
the owner of 100% of the ordinary shares of Shell Transport and
former holders of Shell Transport ordinary shares received Royal
Dutch Shell Class B ordinary shares.
Prior to the consummation of the Unification Transaction, Royal
Dutch and Shell Transport were separate publicly traded
companies that, pursuant to agreements entered into in 1906 and
1907, had combined their interests in the oil industry. Their
operating businesses were held by two intermediate holding
companies, Shell Petroleum and SPCo, and Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport shared in the aggregate net assets and in the
aggregate dividends and interest received from Shell Petroleum
and SPCo in the ratio of 60:40, respectively. Royal Dutch was
entitled to have its nominees elected as a majority of the
members of the boards of directors of Shell Petroleum and SPCo,
and Shell Transport was entitled to have its nominees elected as
a minority of the members of the boards of Shell Petroleum and
SPCo. These agreements were terminated as part of the
Unification Transaction on July 20, 2005.
In 2004, the respective Boards of Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport considered various alternatives to restructure Royal
Dutch, Shell Transport, Shell Petroleum and SPCo which would
(i) simplify the boards and executive management and the
perception thereof, (ii) improve decision making processes
at Royal Dutch, Shell Transport, Shell Petroleum and SPCo and
(iii) enhance effective leadership for the combined entity
as a whole. A single parent company structure, as embodied in
the Unification Transaction, was ultimately decided upon as it
would (i) simplify the corporate structure,
(ii) maintain the tax treatment of dividends for
shareholders through the use of two classes of shares,
(iii) remove the risk of a conflict between the
decision-making bodies of the public parent companies,
(iv) simplify the raising of capital in the future,
(v) reduce regulatory burdens resulting from having two
publicly-traded parent companies, (vi) provide clarity and
simplicity in both management and corporate structure,
(vii) improve efficiency with clear lines of authority and
an empowered Chief Executive, (viii) enhance accountability
through improved clarity in governance and (ix) provide
financial and strategic flexibility.
On May 18, 2005, Royal Dutch Shell, Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport entered into the implementation agreement in respect
of the Unification Transaction setting forth, inter alia,
the conditions to and conduct of the Unification
Transaction, the recommendation and approvals of Royal Dutch and
Shell Transport in connection with the Exchange Offer and the
Scheme, and the corporate governance being implemented in
connection with the Unification Transaction. Pursuant to such
implementation agreement, Royal Dutch Shell agreed with Royal
Dutch and Shell Transport to make the Exchange Offer on the
terms set out in the offer documents with respect thereto. Royal
Dutch agreed, subject to its directors fiduciary duties,
to use all reasonable endeavors to procure the satisfaction of
the conditions to the Exchange Offer and to implement the
Exchange Offer in accordance with its terms as set out in the
offer documents. In addition, Royal Dutch Shell agreed not to
vary, terminate or withdraw the Exchange Offer or to waive the
conditions to the Exchange Offer or to determine whether such
conditions had been satisfied without the prior written consent
of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport.
The Exchange Offer commenced on May 19, 2005, and was
declared unconditional (gestand gedaan) on July 20,
2005, as a result of which Royal Dutch Shell acquired
approximately 92% of the outstanding ordinary shares of Royal
Dutch in exchange for Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary
shares (or ADRs representing such shares). The Scheme was
approved by the High Court on July 19, 2005. On
July 20, 2005, Royal Dutch Shell became the owner of 100%
of the ordinary shares of Shell Transport and former holders of
Shell Transport ordinary shares received Royal Dutch Shell
Class B ordinary shares (or ADRs representing such shares).
Royal Dutch Shell also commenced a subsequent offer acceptance
period on July 20, 2005, during which the remaining holders
of Royal Dutch Shares were permitted to tender their shares in
exchange for Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares (or
ADRs), in accordance with the procedures described in the
Exchange Offer. The subsequent offer acceptance period expired
on August 9, 2005. As a result of the Exchange Offer,
including the subsequent offer acceptance period, Royal Dutch
Shell acquired, and currently holds, approximately 98.5% of the
outstanding Royal Dutch Shares.
The Unification Transaction (including the Exchange Offer) is
described in further detail in the prospectus dated May 19,
2005 (the Prospectus), previously made available to
holders of Royal Dutch Shares and
6
originally filed with the SEC as part of the Registration
Statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-125037) on
May 18, 2005.
2. Background of the Proposed
Transaction
In connection with the Unification Transaction, Royal Dutch
Shell stated that if it acquired at least 95% of the issued
share capital of Royal Dutch it expected, but was not obligated,
to initiate squeeze out proceedings with a view to acquiring
100% of the outstanding share capital of Royal Dutch. Royal
Dutch Shell further stated that it reserved the right to use any
other legally permitted method to obtain 100% of the Royal Dutch
Shares, including engaging in one or more corporate
restructuring transactions such as a merger, liquidation,
transfer of assets or conversion of Royal Dutch into another
form or entity or changing the Royal Dutch articles of
association to alter the corporate or capital structure in a
manner beneficial to Royal Dutch Shell, or engaging in one or
more transactions with Minority Holders including public or
private exchanges or tender offers or purchases for
consideration which may consist of Royal Dutch Shell shares,
other securities or cash. On July 26, 2005, the Board of
Royal Dutch Shell was advised that there were likely to be
governance, tax and management benefits in eliminating the
existing 60:40 cross-holdings of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport
in Shell Petroleum and SPCo and that it may be possible to
acquire the minority interest in Royal Dutch as part of such an
unwind transaction. The Board of Royal Dutch Shell
was also advised that several alternative transactions were
under review by management to obtain 100% of the Royal Dutch
Shares following completion of the Exchange Offer, including a
statutory squeeze out, a statutory merger that could include
cash payment provisions and transactions that would not involve
a compulsory acquisition, such as open market purchases. It was
noted that an extraordinary general meeting of Royal Dutch
shareholders would likely be required for any unwind
transaction. Finally, the Board of Royal Dutch Shell was
informed that further study was required on the alternatives
(including whether it may be possible to offer a loan note
alternative to UK resident holders), and the technical
feasibility of such alternatives, and that any decision on the
acquisition of the minority interest in Royal Dutch could only
occur once the final size and nature of the minority interest
was determined. No actions were taken by the Board of Royal
Dutch Shell and management was asked to report in more detail in
September.
On September 19, 2005, the Board of Royal Dutch Shell
considered a proposal for the unwind of the 60:40 cross-holdings
of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport in Shell Petroleum and SPCo,
including a merger of Royal Dutch into Shell Petroleum, to
achieve governance, management and fiscal efficiencies for the
Shell Group. It was noted that, as part of the unwind proposal,
it would be possible to structure the merger so as to acquire
the approximately 1.5% interest of the Minority Holders in Royal
Dutch and to offer exchangeable loan notes to UK resident
Minority Holders. The Board of Royal Dutch Shell approved making
the unwind proposal, including the acquisition of the interests
of each Minority Holder for cash (or if such Minority Holder is
an eligible UK resident then, at the option of such Minority
Holder, exchangeable loan notes in lieu of cash). The proposal
was subject to final consideration of all aspects of the matter,
including the amount of the cash to be paid, as well as other
possible alternative transactions, at a subsequent meeting of
the Board of Royal Dutch Shell and the Boards of Royal Dutch and
Shell Petroleum.
On September 19, 2005, the Boards of Royal Dutch and Shell
Petroleum considered the proposal for the Proposed Transaction
and noted that the definitive terms and associated risks would
be fully evaluated at a later meeting. The Boards of Royal Dutch
and Shell Petroleum resolved to engage Deloitte Accountants B.V.
(Deloitte) and Ernst & Young Accountants,
The Netherlands (E&Y), respectively, and, in the
case of Royal Dutch, ABN AMRO, to provide certifications,
reports and opinions in connection with the Proposed Transaction.
On October 26, 2005, the Boards of Royal Dutch Shell, Royal
Dutch and Shell Petroleum each met to consider the proposed
definitive terms of the Proposed Transaction, as well as certain
alternatives. Also participating or providing advice were
representatives of management; De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
N.V. (De Brauw), Dutch counsel to Royal Dutch Shell,
Royal Dutch and Shell Petroleum; Cravath, Swaine &
Moore LLP (Cravath), United States counsel to Royal
Dutch Shell, Royal Dutch and Shell Petroleum; Slaughter and May,
English counsel to Royal Dutch Shell, Royal Dutch and Shell
Petroleum; and ABN AMRO.
De Brauw informed the Boards of the legal obligations under
Dutch law in connection with the Proposed Transaction. In
particular, De Brauw informed the Board of Royal Dutch of the
requirement that it act in the best interest of Royal Dutch and
the enterprise associated with Royal Dutch and that this
obligation requires the Board
7
to carefully consider the advantages and disadvantages of a
proposed course of action and to consider the alternatives from
the perspective of the interest of Royal Dutch and not solely
from the perspective of one shareholder or one group of
shareholders. De Brauw informed the Board of Royal Dutch that it
must weigh the interests of all relevant parties in a balanced
and reasonable manner and that it has broad discretion to
resolve upon the course of action which the Board reasonably
believes to be in the best interest of Royal Dutch and the
enterprise associated with Royal Dutch. De Brauw noted that the
Board should give particular attention to the fact that all
members of the Board of Royal Dutch are also members of the
Board of Royal Dutch Shell and that Dutch law requires the Board
of Royal Dutch to be conscious of the fact that there might be a
conflict of interest and to disclose this to shareholders at the
EGM, but that in the present case it was not required for the
Board of Royal Dutch to form a special committee or for
directors to recuse themselves from one board or the other. De
Brauw advised that it would be prudent, given its fiduciary
duties to the Minority Holders, for the Board of Royal Dutch to
engage an independent financial adviser to assist the Board in
determining that the Proposed Transaction is fair, from a
financial point of view, to the Minority Holders. De Brauw also
noted the unprecedented nature of the Merger and advised the
Board of Royal Dutch that in the context of the Merger the Board
should be satisfied that the Minority Holders are treated
reasonably and that in particular the cash amount payable to the
Minority Holders should not be less than the Minority Holders
may reasonably expect to receive in a statutory squeeze out
procedure. De Brauw advised that the Board should also be
satisfied that Royal Dutch or members of the Board are not in
possession, as of the time on which the Exchange Ratio is
determined by the Board or a committee thereof, of undisclosed
price sensitive information regarding Royal Dutch Shell, Royal
Dutch or any of their shares. Further, De Brauw advised that the
Board of Royal Dutch should be satisfied that the value of a
loan note is not more than the cash amount payable in respect of
a Royal Dutch Share. De Brauw also advised the Board of Royal
Dutch that in connection with a squeeze out under Dutch law,
based on precedent transactions involving earlier exchange
offers, it is a near certainty that a Dutch court
would base the amount of cash consideration on the exchange
ratio in the Exchange Offer which was two Royal Dutch Shell
Class A ordinary shares for every Royal Dutch Share.
However, De Brauw advised that it is less clear to establish
which date and time a Dutch court would use to determine the
cash value of the consideration, although most precedent cases
seem to pick the date of the offer becoming
unconditional or the date of first settlement thereafter,
without clarification as to the opening or closing price. De
Brauw also advised that the Dutch court would want to be
satisfied that since the relevant date for determining the cash
value of the consideration, there has been no change in
circumstances which could change its determination of the value
of the shares held by the minority shareholders. Finally, De
Brauw advised that in a squeeze out, interest at the statutory
interest rate on the cash amount is payable from the date when
the court determines the valuation and any dividends declared
after such date and before the date of payment are deducted from
such interest. De Brauw confirmed to the Board of Royal Dutch
that no precedents had been found where a Dutch court has
determined that the price should be less than the value of the
original offer.
Cravath informed the Boards of the requirements of
Rule 13e-3 under the Exchange Act. Slaughter and May
informed the Boards of the terms of the exchangeable loan notes
that eligible UK resident holders may elect to receive.
Management presented to the Boards the proposed methodology for
determining the value of the Merger Consideration. Management
recommended that the Merger Consideration be determined by
taking the highest of: (i) two times the opening price of
Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares as of
July 20, 2005 on Euronext Amsterdam, (ii) the average
of the Royal Dutch Share closing price on Euronext Amsterdam
from July 20, 2005 through September 30, 2005 (the
last day of exchange trading of Royal Dutch Shares before the
Merger Consideration is set), (iii) two times the average
of the Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary share closing
price on Euronext Amsterdam from July 20, 2005 through the
last trading day of Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary
shares before the Merger Consideration is set (the Last
RDS-A Trading Day), (iv) two times the trailing five
day average of the Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary share
closing price on Euronext Amsterdam through the Last RDS-A
Trading Day or (v) two times the trailing two day average
of the Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary share closing
price on Euronext Amsterdam through the Last RDS-A Trading Day.
ABN AMRO presented to the Boards their analyses relating to
(i) the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the
Exchange Ratio and the Merger Consideration pursuant thereto to
the Minority Holders who will
8
receive the Merger Consideration in the Merger. and
(ii) whether the value of the exchangeable loan notes to be
offered to eligible UK resident Minority Holders, when issued,
will be greater than the value of the Merger Consideration, and
informed the Board of Royal Dutch that they would expect to
deliver their written opinions once the proposed amount of the
Merger Consideration was determined in accordance with the
pricing methodology approved by the Boards. For further
discussion of ABN AMROs opinions, see
Section II.4(a), Special Factors Certain
Opinions and Reports Opinions of ABN AMRO.
The Boards also took note of the proposed terms of the
Implementation Agreement, and, in particular, the requirements
to use all reasonable endeavors, subject to their
directors fiduciary duties, to procure the satisfaction of
the conditions set out in the Implementation Agreement and to
implement the Proposed Transaction.
The Board considered the documents presented at the meeting and
the advice of De Brauw, Cravath, Slaughter and May and the
analyses of ABN AMRO and, in particular, their attention was
drawn to the risks associated with the Merger and their duties
to the Minority Holders under Dutch law. For discussion of the
factors considered by the Board of Royal Dutch, see
Section II.3(b) Special Factors Purposes,
Reasons, Fairness, Alternatives and Effects of the Proposed
Transaction Position on the Fairness of the Proposed
Transaction.
As the Boards were aware that Royal Dutch Shell would release
its financial results for the third quarter of 2005 at the
opening of business on October 27, 2005, each Board
resolved to establish a Board Committee (collectively, the
Pricing Committees) for the purpose of determining
the Merger Consideration and receiving the ABN AMRO opinions at
a later date. The members of the Pricing Committees of
Royal Dutch Shell and Shell Petroleum were Messrs van der
Veer and Voser. The members of the Pricing Committee of Royal
Dutch were Messrs van der Veer and Jacobs. The authority of each
Pricing Committee was limited to determining the Merger
Consideration in accordance with the pricing methodology
approved by the relevant Board, and doing all such acts and
things, and approving any changes to and executing and
delivering any documents, deemed necessary, desirable or
appropriate in connection with the Proposed Transaction. Each
Board further resolved that the pricing methodology as
recommended by management was fair to the Minority Shareholders
and such pricing methodology was accordingly approved. Each
Board further resolved to conditionally approve the other
aspects of the Proposed Transaction subject to determination of
the Merger Consideration by the Pricing Committee in accordance
with the pricing methodology so approved.
On October 31, 2005, the Pricing Committees met and
determined a proposed merger consideration of
52.21 in
accordance with the pricing methodology approved by the Boards.
This represented two times the average of the closing prices of
the Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares over the
period July 20, 2005 through October 28, 2005 (rounded
up to the nearest euro cent). On the basis that the Merger
Consideration would be equal to such proposed merger
consideration, ABN AMRO delivered its two written opinions
addressed to the Board of Royal Dutch. The first opinion is to
the effect that, as at October 31, 2005, based upon and
subject to matters considered, assumptions used and
qualifications set forth therein, the Exchange Ratio and the
Merger Consideration pursuant thereto are fair, from a financial
point of view, to the Minority Holders who will receive the
Merger Consideration in the Merger and the second opinion is to
the effect that based upon and subject to matters considered,
assumptions used and qualifications set forth therein, the value
of the exchangeable loan notes to be offered to eligible UK
resident Minority Holders, when issued, will not be greater than
the value of the Merger Consideration to be paid to the Minority
Holders under the terms of the Merger. Accounting certifications
and reports required under Dutch law were also received by the
Boards of Royal Dutch and Shell Petroleum from Deloitte and
E&Y, respectively. These opinions, certifications and
reports are described in more detail below in Section II.4,
Special Factors Certain Opinions and
Reports.
Upon consideration of the opinions from ABN AMRO and the
accounting certifications and reports, the Pricing Committees
unanimously determined that the amount of the Merger
Consideration would be equal to the merger consideration earlier
proposed, and considered by ABN AMRO for purposes of its
opinions, and determined that the Proposed Transaction,
including the Merger and the Merger Consideration, is fair to
the Minority Holders and that the conditions to the Boards
approval of the terms of the Proposed Transaction had been
satisfied.
9
The Proposed Transaction was unanimously approved by the
directors of Royal Dutch who are not employees of Royal Dutch.
No directors of Royal Dutch Shell, Royal Dutch or Shell
Petroleum present at the respective Board meetings dissented or
abstained from voting on the Proposed Transaction.
Except as disclosed herein, none of Royal Dutch Shell, Shell
Petroleum or Royal Dutch is aware of any firm offer by an
unaffiliated third party during the past two years with respect
to a merger or consolidation of Royal Dutch, the sale or other
transfer of all or any substantial portion of the assets of
Royal Dutch, or a purchase of securities of Royal Dutch
securities that would enable such person to exercise control
over Royal Dutch.
Except as disclosed herein, the majority of directors of Royal
Dutch who are not employees of Royal Dutch has not retained an
unaffiliated representative to act solely on behalf of
unaffiliated security holders for the purpose of negotiating the
terms of transaction or preparing a report concerning the
fairness of the transaction.
3. Purposes, Reasons, Fairness,
Alternatives and Effects of the Proposed Transaction
(a) Purposes
and Reasons
The historic holding structure of the Shell Group, whereby Shell
Petroleum and SPCo are each held 60:40 by Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport, respectively, reflected the governance structure that
was implemented by Royal Dutch and Shell Transport pursuant to
the 1906 and 1907 agreements under which the Shell Group was
formed. Since those agreements were terminated as part of the
Unification Transaction on July 20, 2005, the 60:40 cross
holdings are no longer necessary for governance purposes.
The primary purpose of the Proposed Transaction is to achieve
governance, management, and fiscal efficiencies for the Shell
Group. The Merger will simplify the organizational structure of
the Shell Group and eliminate the potential investor confusion
of having, and the duplicative and administrative burdens
associated with maintaining, two publicly held companies in the
Shell Group. The Proposed Transaction will also allow the Shell
Group to realize overall tax efficiencies for 2005 and
thereafter by unifying the Dutch tax resident companies into one
Dutch fiscal group and the UK tax resident companies into
another fiscal group. In particular, completion of the Merger in
2005 will allow for tax consolidation of Royal Dutch and Shell
Petroleum under Dutch law from January 1, 2005. If the
Proposed Transaction is not completed before January 1,
2006, the Implementation Agreement may be terminated by Royal
Dutch Shell or Royal Dutch.
The Merger will also allow Royal Dutch Shell to acquire 100% of
the interests in Royal Dutch as contemplated in the Unification
Transaction, on a basis that is likely to be less time consuming
and procedurally more efficient than the implementation of
statutory squeeze out proceedings under Dutch law. Royal Dutch
Shell has resolved to initiate statutory squeeze out proceedings
in relation to Royal Dutch, if for any reason it should be
impossible to complete the Merger. A squeeze out would result in
all Minority Holders receiving a cash payment in exchange for
their Royal Dutch Shares. An additional benefit of the Merger
compared with Dutch statutory squeeze out proceedings is that it
allows the offer of exchangeable loan notes to eligible UK
resident Minority Holders.
10
The diagrams below illustrate the structure of the Shell Group
before and after the Proposed Transaction.
(b) Position
on the Fairness of the Proposed Transaction
|
|
|
Position of Royal Dutch on the fairness of the Proposed
Transaction |
The Board of Royal Dutch believes that the Proposed Transaction
is fair to and in the best interest of Royal Dutch and the
enterprise associated with Royal Dutch and is fair to the
Minority Holders. This belief is based on the following factors,
each of which, in their view, supports these conclusions:
|
|
|
|
|
The fact that the Merger Consideration is equal to two times
26.103 (rounded
up to the nearest euro cent), being the average Royal Dutch
Shell Class A ordinary share closing price over the period
July 20, 2005 to October 28, 2005, which results in
premiums of 0.6% and 2.8% relative to two times the Royal Dutch
Shell Class A ordinary share opening price and closing price,
respectively, on Euronext Amsterdam on July 20, 2005, a
1.2% premium relative to the Royal Dutch Share closing price on
Euronext Amsterdam on September 30, 2005 (the last day of
exchange trading of Royal Dutch Shares before the Merger
Consideration was set), and a 7.3% premium to the average Royal
Dutch Share closing price over the period January 1 to
September 30, 2005 (it also reflects premiums of 20.7% and
11.2% to the average of the prices at which Royal Dutch Shares
were repurchased since the beginning of 2004 and in 2005,
respectively, as noted by ABN AMRO). The Board noted the advice
of De Brauw, described above, that under Dutch law the Board
should be satisfied that the Minority Holders are treated
reasonably. In this connection, the Board concluded that the
trading price of the Royal Dutch Shell shares is a highly
objective proxy for valuing the underlying enterprise (so long
as all material price sensitive information has been disclosed
to the market). In reaching that conclusion, the Board
considered that (i) 98.5% of the |
11
|
|
|
|
|
Royal Dutch shareholders who tendered their Royal Dutch Shares
in the Exchange Offer received Royal Dutch Shell Class A
ordinary shares, (ii) shareholders of Royal Dutch and Royal
Dutch Shell hold an interest in the same economic entity,
(iii) the historic share price development of Royal Dutch
is broadly in line with the historic share price development of
Royal Dutch Shell, and (iv) Royal Dutch Shell is a very
large listed company, well covered by equity analysts, with a
diversified shareholder base and with highly liquid shares. The
Board also considered that the Royal Dutch Shell Class A
ordinary shares are a better proxy for underlying value than the
Class B ordinary shares because although Royal Dutch Shell
Class A and Class B ordinary shares hold the same
economic interest in the Shell Group, the difference in market
prices between these two classes of shares is likely
attributable to the dividend access scheme, created for tax
purposes, in which holders of Royal Dutch Shell Class B
ordinary shares participate, and in which holders of Royal Dutch
Shell Class A ordinary shares and Royal Dutch Shares do not
participate. The Board also noted that Royal Dutch Shares
represent only 1.5% of the equity of Royal Dutch and do not have
the ability to affect the outcome of any matter put to a vote of
shareholders of Royal Dutch and so should not command any
control or strategic premium. It was
noted that this is supported by the fact that during the period
beginning after August 9, 2005 (when the subsequent offer
acceptance period under the Exchange Offer ended) through
September 30, 2005 (the last day of exchange trading of
Royal Dutch Shares before the Merger Consideration was set), the
Royal Dutch Shares largely traded at a discount to two Royal
Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares. It was also noted that
the Merger would not result in any synergies that would justify
a material premium over market prices. |
|
|
|
The fact that the Merger Consideration reflects the highest of
the pricing formulas considered under the pricing methodology
and reflects a 2:1 ratio based on closing market prices on
Euronext Amsterdam. The Board considered that this approach
provided the Minority Holders the benefit of increases in the
trading price of the Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary
shares over both longer and shorter periods since July 20,
2005 and allowed for the amount of the Merger Consideration to
reflect any market reaction to the information contained in the
2005 third quarter results announcement. It is also consistent
with the Dutch legal advice regarding Dutch statutory squeeze
out proceedings received from De Brauw as described above. The
Board also noted that the 2:1 ratio reflects the ratio of the
Exchange Offer (although Royal Dutch Shares have largely traded
at a discount to this ratio after August 9, 2005). The
Board determined to use Euronext Amsterdam as the reference
market because the greatest volume of Royal Dutch Shell Class A
ordinary shares is traded on Euronext Amsterdam, noting also
that Euronext Amsterdam uses an auction at market close (the
result of which is published), which is judged to be more
transparent to non-market participants than other metrics such
as volume weighted average prices. |
|
|
|
The fact that Royal Dutch Shell has resolved to initiate
statutory squeeze out proceedings in relation to Royal Dutch, if
for any reason it should be impossible to complete the Merger
(Royal Dutch Shell, as the owner of more than 95% of the share
capital of Royal Dutch, has the right to implement such
proceedings without the consent of Royal Dutch), and the advice
of De Brauw, noted above, that a Dutch court would likely award
cash consideration equivalent to the cash value per share of the
Exchange Offer as of the close of the Exchange Offer, with
consideration as to whether there is a change of circumstances
in the intervening time period to the time at which the Board
determines the Exchange Ratio, and that squeeze out proceedings
would likely take considerably longer to complete than the
Merger. Accordingly, the Board determined that the Merger would
allow the Minority Holders to receive cash for their Royal Dutch
Shares more quickly and more efficiently than through statutory
squeeze out proceedings. |
|
|
|
The fact that Minority Holders on the applicable record date
will receive the Royal Dutch interim dividend for the third
quarter of 2005 of
0.46 per share
(or $0.5556 per share for holders of New York registered shares)
which will be payable on December 15, 2005, and that the
Merger Consideration was set based on trading prices that
included the expected quarterly dividend. The Board also noted
that, as in Dutch statutory squeeze out proceedings, the terms
of the Merger provide (a) for interest to accrue on the
Merger Consideration at the statutory rate of 4% per annum from
October 31, 2005 until the effective date of the Merger
(expected to be December 21, 2005), as part of the
consideration under the Merger, and (b) for any dividends
payable in that period (before the deduction of any withholding
tax from such dividend) to be deducted from that interest amount. |
12
|
|
|
|
|
The fact that the Proposed Transaction would allow for eligible
UK resident holders to have the option to elect to receive
exchangeable loan notes, which, under provisions of UK law,
would allow for a rollover of UK capital gains tax, and that
this election would not be available in a statutory squeeze out
proceeding. |
|
|
|
The terms and conditions of the Implementation Agreement,
including the requirements for an extraordinary general meeting
and the other requirements of Dutch law relating to the
establishment of the Exchange Ratio and the Merger Consideration
pursuant thereto. In connection with its evaluation of the
Exchange Ratio and the Merger Consideration pursuant thereto,
the Board of Royal Dutch noted that a reclassification of shares
would occur in connection with the election by eligible UK
resident Minority Holders to receive loan notes but was not
otherwise expected to have any ultimate substantive effect on
Royal Dutch shareholders. |
|
|
|
The two written opinions dated October 31, 2005 of ABN AMRO
to the Board of Royal Dutch to the effect that, based upon and
subject to the matters considered, assumptions used and
qualifications set forth therein, (i) as at
October 31, 2005, the Exchange Ratio and the Merger
Consideration pursuant thereto are fair, from a financial point
of view, to the Minority Holders who will receive the Merger
Consideration in the Merger, and (ii) the value of the
exchangeable loan notes to be offered to eligible UK resident
Minority Holders, when issued, will not be greater than the
value of the Merger Consideration to be paid to the Minority
Holders under the terms of the Merger. |
|
|
|
The certifications and reports delivered by Deloitte and
E&Y, pursuant to and in accordance with Dutch legal
requirements, that (i) the Exchange Ratio is reasonable, (ii)
the equity of Royal Dutch as of September 30, 2005 was at
least equal to the nominal value of the aggregate number of the
shares to be allotted by Shell Petroleum pursuant to the
Exchange Ratio, plus the cash payments and loan notes issued for
fractional entitlements represented by the Merger Consideration. |
The Board of Royal Dutch also considered the following adverse
factors:
|
|
|
|
|
The fact that the Minority Holders receiving the Merger
Consideration would not have a continuing interest in the Shell
Group. However, this factor was considered mitigated by the fact
that in a statutory squeeze out proceeding, which Royal Dutch
Shell intends to implement if the Proposed Transaction is not
completed, Minority Holders would also not have any continuing
interest in the Shell Group. It was also mitigated by the fact
that holders had the opportunity to participate in the Exchange
Offer and were advised in connection with the Exchange Offer
that Royal Dutch Shell intended to acquire 100% of the Royal
Dutch Shares by means of a squeeze out proceeding or other
transaction. |
|
|
|
The fact that the Proposed Transaction would be taxable in a
number of jurisdictions for Minority Holders receiving the
Merger Consideration. However, this was considered mitigated by
the fact that Minority Holders will be entitled to receive cash
payments for their Royal Dutch Shares. |
|
|
|
The fact that the Proposed Transaction would not require a
separate vote of the unaffiliated shareholders. However, this
factor was considered mitigated by the fact that a financial
advisor to Royal Dutch had provided an opinion with respect to
the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the Exchange
Ratio and the Merger Consideration pursuant thereto and that
Dutch law does not require such a vote. |
|
|
|
The fact that loan notes would only be offered to eligible UK
residents giving appropriate representations. However, this was
considered mitigated by the fact that the Board of Royal Dutch
had received an opinion of ABN AMRO to the effect that, based
upon and subject to matters considered, assumptions used and
qualifications set forth therein, the value of the exchangeable
loan notes to be offered to eligible UK resident Minority
Holders, when issued, will not be greater than the value of the
Merger Consideration to be paid to the Minority Holders under
the terms of the Merger. The Board also noted that as a result
of the two share limit, the market value of the consideration
received on exchange will be less than the face amount of the
loan notes unless the Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary
shares are trading above the sterling equivalent of
26.1050 (being
one-half of the Merger Consideration of
52.21) at the
time of exchange (the sterling equivalent value being set based
on the euro/sterling exchange rate on the day prior to the
effective date of the Merger). It was noted that Royal Dutch was
not aware of any other jurisdiction apart from the UK where
Minority Holders are resident and a loan note would provide a
comparable |
13
|
|
|
|
|
benefit. Therefore, given the above, it was not anticipated that
loan notes would be attractive to holders outside the UK. It was
also noted that an offer of loan notes in some countries
(including the U.S. and The Netherlands) would require the
preparation of a prospectus or other regulatory compliance that
would involve additional time and expense. |
|
|
|
The fact that under Dutch law the amount of the Exchange Ratio
and the Merger Consideration pursuant thereto must be determined
no later than on the date of signing of the Merger Proposal
(October 31, 2005), and cannot be adjusted prior to the
effective date of the Merger (which is expected to be
December 21, 2005). It was noted that this may be adverse
to the Minority Holders if the price of Royal Dutch Shell Shares
increases during that period, however, this was considered
mitigated as Minority Holders are also insulated against
decreases in the Royal Dutch Shell share price during that
period. |
The Board of Royal Dutch also noted the following factors which
support the fairness of the transaction to Royal Dutch and the
enterprise associated with Royal Dutch, and were not considered
adverse to its determination of the fairness of the Proposed
Transaction to Minority Holders.
|
|
|
|
|
The fact that the Merger will complete the unification of Royal
Dutch and Shell Transport under Royal Dutch Shell as
contemplated by the Unification Transaction and follows the
successful Exchange Offer in which holders of 98.5% of Royal
Dutch Shares participated and received Royal Dutch Shell shares,
and the fact that the Merger will allow Royal Dutch Shell to
acquire 100% of the interests in Royal Dutch as contemplated in
the Unification Transaction, on a basis that is likely to be
less time consuming and procedurally more efficient than the
implementation of statutory squeeze out proceedings under Dutch
law. |
|
|
|
The fact that the Proposed Transaction will achieve governance,
management, and fiscal efficiencies for the Shell Group because
it will (i) simplify the organizational structure of the
Shell Group and eliminate the potential investor confusion of
having, and the duplicative and administrative burdens
associated with maintaining, two publicly held holding companies
in the Shell Group, and (ii) allow the Shell Group to
realize overall tax efficiencies for 2005 and thereafter by
unifying the Dutch tax resident companies into one Dutch fiscal
group and the UK tax resident companies into another fiscal
group and, in particular, the completion of the Merger in 2005
allows for tax consolidation of Royal Dutch and Shell Petroleum
under Dutch law from January 1, 2005. |
In view of the variety of factors considered by the Board of
Royal Dutch, the Board did not find it practicable to, and did
not, quantify or otherwise attempt to assign specific or
relative weights to the factors it considered in reaching their
determinations, although it considered certain mitigating
factors in relation to the adverse factors, as discussed above,
and concluded that the favorable factors outweighed the adverse
factors.
Other than as described above, the Board of Royal Dutch did not
consider any further factors regarding the fairness to Minority
Holders of the Proposed Transaction. The Board considered that
the factors considered provided a reasonable basis to form the
belief stated above. As discussed above, the Board considered
the enterprise value of the Shell Group, on the basis of the
market price of the Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares.
Although there are other valuation methodologies to assess the
fundamental valuation of the Shell Group, their relevance was
considered debatable in this context given their inherent
subjectivity (when compared to the objective benchmark of the
market determined Royal Dutch Shell share price) and the
significant underlying assumptions necessary. The Board
considered that: (i) discounted cash flow (DCF)
analysis is heavily dependent on the assumptions made as to the
key drivers of value (e.g. inter alia, crude oil price and
refining margins) and the required rate of return or discount
rate applied; and (ii) benchmarking the valuation of Royal
Dutch Shell against the market valuation of comparable companies
(by reference to operating and equity market valuation
characteristics) provides a gauge for how Royal Dutch Shell is
valued versus its peer group, but the differences in valuation
between listed companies reflect the outcome of the
markets assessment of company-specific factors and
differences in business profile. The Board noted the net asset
value information contained in the presentation by ABN AMRO
which included that the Merger Consideration represents a
premium of 120.5% to the Royal Dutch net assets per share
determined on a parent company-only basis under Dutch GAAP as at
September 30, 2005 and a premium of 117.3% to the
approximate amount of Royal Dutch net assets per share on a
consolidated basis under IFRS (such approximate amount being
determined based on Royal
14
Dutch Shells estimate that 60% of Royal Dutch Shell
consolidated net assets is a reasonable proxy for the
consolidated net assets of Royal Dutch). The Board did not
consider net asset value per share to be relevant because of the
fact that it primarily reflects the accounting carrying values
of tangible and intangible assets, rather than their current
fair values. The Board also did not consider liquidation value
to be relevant because the Shell Group is not being liquidated
and appraisals relating to the value of the assets and
liabilities of the Shell Group are not available and a
meaningful analysis of this value would be impracticable. Also,
all of these metrics fail to account for the fact that Minority
Holders will be squeezed out at a price related to market prices
if the Merger is not completed. This fact reinforces the
relevance of a valuation metric based on Royal Dutch Shell share
prices.
|
|
|
Positions of Royal Dutch Shell and Shell Petroleum on
fairness to the Minority Holders |
The Boards of Royal Dutch Shell and Shell Petroleum believe that
the Proposed Transaction is fair to the Minority Holders. In
reaching this conclusion, Royal Dutch Shell and Shell Petroleum
have noted the certifications, reports and opinions being
delivered to the Board of Royal Dutch by ABN AMRO, Deloitte and
E&Y and the factors being considered by and the analyses and
conclusions being made by the Board of Royal Dutch and have
expressly adopted these factors, analyses and conclusions.
|
|
(c) |
Alternatives Considered |
The alternatives considered by the Boards of Royal Dutch Shell,
Royal Dutch and Shell Petroleum to acquire the interests of the
Minority Holders of Royal Dutch were:
Squeeze out under Dutch law: As a holder of greater than
95% of the issued and outstanding share capital of Royal Dutch,
pursuant to Article 2:92a of the Dutch Civil Code, Royal
Dutch Shell is permitted to initiate proceedings against the
Minority Holders of Royal Dutch Shares to force the Minority
Holders to transfer their Royal Dutch Shares to Royal Dutch
Shell against payment of a price in cash to be determined by a
Dutch court.
Although statutory squeeze out proceedings would result in the
acquisition by Royal Dutch Shell of 100% of the Royal Dutch
Shares, this alternative was rejected by the Boards as it would
take significantly longer to complete than the Merger and is a
procedurally less efficient method of achieving this objective.
The Boards were advised by De Brauw that if the unwind of the
60:40 cross holdings was implemented without acquiring the
minority interests in Royal Dutch, a statutory squeeze out could
only be implemented after such unwind was completed, in which
case it is likely that the minority interests would remain until
2007. Additionally, the Boards considered that the associated
costs and administrative burdens of Royal Dutch continuing as a
public company, including the costs of preparing filings and
financial statements, were not insignificant. The Boards also
considered that a squeeze out would not achieve the fiscal
efficiencies arising from the consolidation of Royal Dutch and
Shell Petroleum under the Merger and would not permit the use of
loan notes.
Offers for Royal Dutch Shares: The Boards also considered
whether to initiate a second offer to exchange Royal Dutch
Shares for Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares. The
Boards rejected initiating a second exchange offer as such a
transaction would require similar documentation and regulatory
clearances as the previous Exchange Offer and a comparable
amount of time, cost and effort. Additionally, a second exchange
offer would not result in the compulsory acquisition of the
entire interest of the Minority Holders in Royal Dutch and
statutory squeeze out procedures under Dutch law would still be
required to acquire the residual minority. For similar reasons,
the use of open market transactions to acquire the interests of
the Minority Holders was rejected after a preliminary review.
(d) Effects
of the Proposed Transaction
General. Upon completion of the Proposed Transaction,
Royal Dutch Shell will hold a 100% interest in the assets, the
net book value and the net earnings of the Shell Group, an
increase of 0.9% from its current interest (in each case
excluding minority interests in subsidiaries of the Group). On
this basis Royal Dutch Shells interest in the assets and
net book value of the Shell Group as of September 30, 2005,
would increase by $2.2 billion and $0.9 billion,
respectively, and its interest in the net earnings of the Shell
Group for the nine months ending September 30, 2005 would
increase by $0.2 billion (excluding the impact of the
Merger Consideration to be paid and assuming the Unification
Transaction had been completed as of December 31, 2004).
Accordingly, Royal Dutch Shell and its shareholders will be the
beneficiaries of any future increases in the value of the Shell
Group and will bear the entire risk of all losses incurred in
the operation of, and all decreases in
15
the value of, the Shell Group. It is intended that the Proposed
Transaction will allow the Shell Group to further realize
efficiencies made possible by, or intended to result from, the
Unification Transaction.
Except as noted below, as a result of the completion of the
Proposed Transaction, the Minority Holders will no longer have
any equity interest in Royal Dutch and will therefore cease to
benefit from, and bear any of the risks incident to, ownership
of an equity interest in the Shell Group. The loan notes are
exchangeable for a number of Class A ordinary shares of
Royal Dutch Shell based on the principal value of their loan
notes divided by the market price of the Class A ordinary
shares at the time of the exchange subject to a maximum two
share limit, being the number of shares such holders would have
received had such holders tendered in the Exchange Offer. As a
result of the two share limit, the market value of the
consideration received on exchange will be less than the face
amount of the loan notes unless the Royal Dutch Shell
Class A ordinary shares are trading above the sterling
equivalent of
26.1050 (being
one-half of the Merger Consideration of
52.21) at the
time of the exchange. The sterling equivalent value of the loan
notes will be set using the euro/sterling exchange rate on the
day prior to the effective date of the Merger. The exchange for
Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares can be required
by Royal Dutch Shell or the holder of the exchangeable loan
notes in accordance with the terms of such loan notes. Royal
Dutch Shell intends (but is not obliged) to exchange the loan
notes on the first exchange date, which will be January 6,
2006.
Upon completion of the Merger, Shell Petroleum will be the
surviving entity and Royal Dutch and the Royal Dutch Shares will
cease to exist. Due to this, trading of Royal Dutch Shares will
cease, Royal Dutch will be delisted from the NYSE (if it has not
been delisted prior to the Merger), the registration of the
Royal Dutch Shares under the Exchange Act will be terminated and
Shell Petroleum, as the successor of Royal Dutch, will not be
subject to the periodic reporting obligations of the Exchange
Act or otherwise be subject to the U.S. Federal securities
laws applicable to public companies.
For a further discussion of the effects of the Proposed
Transaction, please see Section IV.1, The Proposed
Transaction Overview of the Proposed
Transaction. For a discussion of U.S. Federal and
Dutch income tax consequences of the Proposed Transaction on the
holders of Royal Dutch Shares, please see Section V,
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax and Dutch Tax
Consequences.
|
|
4. |
Certain Opinions and Reports |
(a) Opinions
of ABN AMRO
|
|
|
(i) Opinion with respect to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the Exchange Ratio and the Merger
Consideration pursuant thereto to the Minority Holders receiving
the Merger Consideration |
In connection with the Proposed Transaction, Royal Dutch
retained ABN AMRO to act as its financial advisor and render an
opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of
the Exchange Ratio and the Merger Consideration pursuant thereto
to the Minority Holders who will receive the Merger
Consideration. ABN AMRO delivered a written opinion to the Board
of Royal Dutch dated October 31, 2005 that, as at that
date, and based upon and subject to the matters considered and
the assumptions and qualifications set forth in the opinion, the
Exchange Ratio and the Merger Consideration pursuant thereto
were fair, from a financial point of view, to the Minority
Holders who will receive the Merger Consideration in the Merger.
The full text of the written opinion of ABN AMRO is attached
hereto as Annex A and sets forth, among other things, the
assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and
limitations on the scope of the review undertaken by ABN AMRO in
rendering its opinion. ABN AMRO provided its opinion to the
Board of Royal Dutch in connection with its evaluation of the
Proposed Transaction, the opinion does not in any way constitute
a recommendation by ABN AMRO to any Royal Dutch shareholders as
to whether such holders should vote for or against the Merger,
whether any Minority Holder should receive the Merger
Consideration or elect to receive the Loan
Note Consideration (as such term is defined below) or how
any Minority Holder should otherwise act in relation to the
Proposed Transaction. This summary does not purport to be a
complete description of the opinion and analyses performed by
ABN AMRO and is qualified by reference to the written opinion of
ABN AMRO set forth in Annex A hereto but it does summarize
all of the material analyses performed and presented by ABN
AMRO. You are urged to read the opinion carefully and in its
entirety.
16
The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process
involving various determinations as to the most appropriate and
relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of
those methods to the particular circumstances and, therefore, a
fairness opinion is not readily susceptible to partial analysis
or summary description. Selecting portions of the analyses or
the summary set forth below, without considering the analyses as
a whole, could create an incomplete or misleading view of the
process underlying the opinion of ABN AMRO. In arriving at its
opinion, ABN AMRO made qualitative judgments as to the
significance and relevance of each analysis and factor that it
considered. Accordingly, ABN AMRO believes that its analyses
must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its
analyses and factors or focusing on selected elements thereof,
without considering all analyses and factors or the narrative
description of the analyses, could create a misleading or
incomplete view of the processes underlying its analyses and
opinion.
The analyses were prepared for the purposes of ABN AMRO
providing its opinion to the Board of Royal Dutch in connection
with its evaluation of the Exchange Ratio and the Merger
Consideration pursuant thereto to be paid to Minority Holders
under the terms of the Merger and do not purport to be
appraisals or to reflect levels at which Royal Dutch Shell
Class A ordinary shares or any other securities might trade
in the future which may be significantly more or less favorable
than as set forth in these analyses.
For the purposes of providing its opinion, ABN AMRO:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available business and financial
information relating to Royal Dutch, including the audited
annual financial statements (the annual accounts)
for the consecutive financial years ending December 31,
1999 through December 31, 2004 and the unaudited nine-month
financial figures for the period ending September 30, 2005; |
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available business and financial
information relating to Shell Transport, including the audited
annual accounts for the consecutive financial years ending
December 31, 1999 through December 31, 2004 and the
unaudited nine-month financial figures for the period ending
September 30, 2005 as prepared for the purposes of the
Proposed Transaction; |
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available business and financial
information relating to Royal Dutch Shell, including the audited
annual accounts for the consecutive financial years ending
December 31, 2002 through December 31, 2004 and the
unaudited nine-month financial figures for the period ending
September 30, 2005; |
|
|
|
reviewed certain documents relating to the Proposed Transaction
and the Unification Transaction, including among other things
the pricing methodology approved by the Boards of Royal Dutch
Shell, Royal Dutch and Shell Petroleum; |
|
|
|
participated in discussions with and reviewed information
provided by management and employees of Royal Dutch Shell and
Royal Dutch and their advisers with respect to matters ABN AMRO
believed necessary or appropriate for its enquiry; |
|
|
|
reviewed the historical share prices and trading volumes of
Royal Dutch Shell shares, Royal Dutch Shares and Shell Transport
shares; |
|
|
|
reviewed publicly available data regarding share buybacks of
Royal Dutch Shell, Royal Dutch and Shell Transport; |
|
|
|
reviewed the financial terms of certain transactions ABN AMRO
believed to be comparable to the Proposed Transaction; |
|
|
|
reviewed the legal review on the typical price determination in
a squeeze out proceeding under Dutch law by the Court of Appeal
in The Netherlands provided to Royal Dutch Shell by De Brauw,
Dutch legal counsel to Royal Dutch, Royal Dutch Shell and Shell
Petroleum, which was reviewed and concurred with by Freshfields
Bruckhaus Deringer (Freshfields), Dutch legal
counsel to ABN AMRO; |
|
|
|
reviewed publicly available data regarding the market practice
of settlement of fractional entitlements; and |
17
|
|
|
|
|
performed such other financial reviews and analysis, as ABN
AMRO, in its absolute discretion, deemed appropriate. |
ABN AMRO assumed and relied upon, without independent
verification (other than the legal review mentioned above), the
truth, accuracy and completeness of the information, data,
analysis and financial terms provided to it or used by it,
including, among other things, the information, analysis and
advice received by Royal Dutch Shell, Royal Dutch and Shell
Petroleum from their respective advisors, assumed that the same
were not misleading and does not assume or accept any liability
or responsibility for any independent verification of such
information or any independent valuation or appraisal of any of
the assets, operations or liabilities (other than the analysis
of loan notes for the purposes of a separate opinion of ABN AMRO
as described below) of Royal Dutch, Shell Petroleum, Shell
Transport or Royal Dutch Shell nor was ABN AMRO provided with
such valuation or appraisal. No financial forecasts were
provided to ABN AMRO for purposes of its analyses. In preparing
its opinion, ABN AMRO received specific confirmation from senior
management of Royal Dutch that the assumptions specified in its
written opinion were reasonable and no information had been
withheld from ABN AMRO that could have influenced the purport of
the opinion or the assumptions on which it is based.
Further, ABN AMROs opinion is necessarily based on
financial, economic, monetary, market and other conditions,
including those in the securities and oil and gas markets, as in
effect on, and the information made available to ABN AMRO or
used by it up to, the date of the opinion. ABN AMROs
opinion exclusively focuses on the fairness, from a financial
point of view, of the Exchange Ratio and the Merger
Consideration pursuant thereto to the Minority Holders who will
receive the Merger Consideration, and does not address any other
issues such as the underlying business decision to merge Royal
Dutch and Shell Petroleum or to recommend the Merger or to
effect the Merger as opposed to any other transaction or
procedure that would allow Royal Dutch Shell to acquire shares
of Royal Dutch that it does not already own, or the commercial
merits of any of the foregoing, the fairness of the Loan
Note Consideration to eligible UK resident Minority Holders
who elect to receive loan notes in lieu of the Merger
Consideration or the prices or volumes at which the shares of
Royal Dutch Shell or any other securities may trade following
completion of the Proposed Transaction. Subsequent developments
in the aforementioned conditions may affect ABN AMROs
opinion and the assumptions made in preparing the opinion and
ABN AMRO is not obliged to update, revise or reaffirm its
opinion if such conditions change.
In rendering its opinion, ABN AMRO has not provided legal,
regulatory, tax, accounting or actuarial advice and accordingly
ABN AMRO does not assume any responsibility or liability in
respect thereof. ABN AMRO did not participate in negotiations
with respect to the terms of the Implementation Agreement.
Furthermore, ABN AMRO assumed that the Proposed Transaction will
be consummated on the terms and conditions as set out in the
Implementation Agreement, without any material changes to, or
waiver of, those terms or conditions.
As described on page 11 under Special Factors
Purposes, Reasons, Fairness, Alternatives and Effects of
the Proposed Transaction Position on the Fairness of
the Proposed Transaction, the Board of Royal Dutch took
into account a number of factors in evaluating the Exchange
Ratio and the Merger Consideration pursuant thereto and reaching
a determination to recommend the Proposed Transaction,
including, but not limited to, ABN AMROs opinion.
Accordingly, ABN AMROs analyses summarized below should
not be viewed as determinative of the views of the Board of
Royal Dutch with respect to the Proposed Transaction.
In order to consider the fairness, from a financial point of
view, to the Minority Holders who will receive the Merger
Consideration, of the Exchange Ratio and the Merger
Consideration pursuant thereto, a key principle underlying ABN
AMROs approach and analyses was that the Exchange Ratio
and the Merger Consideration pursuant thereto under the terms of
the Merger should be considered in the context of the
Unification Transaction. ABN AMRO considered this principle to
be important based on the fact that the Merger was proposed
shortly after the Unification Transaction, in which holders of
approximately 98.5% of Royal Dutch Shares received two Royal
Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares (or one ADR) for each
Royal Dutch Share exchanged, and that, accordingly, the Exchange
Ratio and the Merger Consideration needed to be considered in
light of the exchange ratio in the Exchange Offer. Furthermore,
as discussed below, ABN AMRO understood that a Dutch court would
typically base the price to be paid to minority shareholders in
a squeeze out transaction on the consideration paid in the
transaction preceding the squeeze-out.
18
ABN AMRO assumed that the effective date of the Merger will be
no later than December 31, 2005 and that Royal Dutch will
pay a dividend in an amount equal to
0.46 to the
shareholders of Royal Dutch prior to such effective date.
ABN AMRO performed the analyses described below for the purposes
of evaluating whether the Exchange Ratio and the Merger
Consideration pursuant thereto were fair, from a financial point
of view, as at the date of the opinion to the Minority Holders
who will receive the Merger Consideration. The following is a
summary of the financial analyses performed by ABN AMRO in
connection with the rendering of its opinion.
ABN AMRO performed the following analyses:
|
|
|
|
|
ABN AMRO analyzed the value that would be attributable to the
Minority Holders (before payment of fractional entitlements) in
the Proposed Transaction based on their economic interest in the
Shell Group. |
|
|
|
In particular ABN AMRO performed an analysis to establish that
the Proposed Transaction does not alter the current economic
interest of the Minority Holders in the Shell Group (before
payment of fractional entitlements). ABN AMRO also analyzed
market practice with respect to determining the cash value of
fractional entitlements. In addition, ABN AMRO conducted an
analysis to determine whether the market price of Royal Dutch
Shares can be used as an indication of the going concern value
of the Shell Group and of Royal Dutch. |
|
|
|
ABN AMRO analyzed the consideration typically paid to minority
shareholders under Dutch legal squeeze out proceedings. Given
that Royal Dutch Shell has decided to implement the Merger as it
is likely to be less time consuming and procedurally more
efficient than statutory squeeze out proceedings under Dutch
law, and given also that Royal Dutch Shell has advised Royal
Dutch that if the Proposed Transaction is not completed as
proposed, it intends to implement squeeze out proceedings, ABN
AMRO have considered how a Dutch court would typically determine
the price payable to minority shareholders in squeeze out
proceedings under Dutch law. |
|
|
|
ABN AMRO analyzed the consideration paid in precedent
unification transactions. |
|
|
|
ABN AMRO compared the Merger Consideration to the Royal Dutch
Share price and net asset value per Royal Dutch Share. |
ABN AMRO has not analyzed the liquidation value of Royal Dutch
due to the unavailability of appraisals relating to the value of
the assets and liabilities of the Shell Group and the
impracticality of making a meaningful analysis of this value. In
addition, Royal Dutch Shell has stated that it does not intend
to liquidate Royal Dutch Shell or Royal Dutch in the foreseeable
future.
|
|
|
Analysis of the value which would be attributable to the
Minority Holders of Royal Dutch based on the economic interest
that they have in the Shell Group |
The current economic interest of the Minority Holders in the
Shell Group is approximately 0.9%, determined by multiplying an
approximate 1.5% direct shareholding that the Minority Holders
have in Royal Dutch by 60%, which is the current economic
interest of Royal Dutch in the Shell Group. ABN AMRO analyzed
whether the current 60% interest of Royal Dutch in the Shell
Group is supported by analyses of historical dividend receipts
and payments, share buybacks, trading relationship and relative
adjusted net current assets.
|
|
|
Historic dividend receipts and payments |
ABN AMRO extracted information regarding the dividends received
and receivable from the cash flow statements and balance sheets
respectively of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport from their
respective annual reports and accounts for the preceding six
years. This information was translated at currency exchange
rates applicable to those periods. From these analyses, ABN AMRO
has concluded that over a 5-year period, the average dividends
paid and payable from the Shell Group to Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport, respectively, have broadly been on a 60/40 basis
(60.0/40.0 based on cash flow statements and 60.2/39.8 based on
the balance sheets), matching the 60/40 interests in the Shell
Group of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport, respectively. ABN AMRO
also reviewed the dividend payments of Royal Dutch Shell in
2005. The second and third quarter 2005
19
dividends declared to Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary
shareholders and Royal Dutch shareholders post completion of the
Unification Transaction support a 2 : 1 exchange ratio
between Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares and Royal
Dutch Shares.
|
|
|
Historic share buyback programs |
ABN AMRO examined Royal Dutchs and Shell Transports
share buyback programs from February 2001 to the completion of
the Unification Transaction. The total value of shares of Royal
Dutch and Shell Transport repurchased by Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport, respectively, was calculated for each buyback date.
The total value of Shell Transport shares repurchased was
converted into euro at the prevailing currency exchange rate for
each repurchase date. The Royal Dutch Shares, on average,
contributed 59.7% of the total value of share buybacks and the
Shell Transport shares contributed 40.3%, substantially matching
the 60/40 value apportionment implemented in the Unification
Transaction. The total number of shares of Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport repurchased by each of those companies was
74.8 million and 340.2 million, respectively, during this
period. ABN AMRO noted that following completion of the
Unification Transaction, Royal Dutch Shell has repurchased (for
cancellation) approximately 82 million Royal Dutch Shell
Class A ordinary shares, ABN AMRO concluded that such
repurchases should not impact its analysis of the Exchange Ratio
and the Merger Consideration pursuant thereto.
|
|
|
Historic trading relationship |
ABN AMRO analyzed the historic trading of Royal Dutch Shares and
Shell Transport ordinary shares. The share prices were
translated at currency exchange rates prevailing at that time.
The share prices were subsequently multiplied by the shares
outstanding (at the applicable times) of Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport, respectively, to arrive at the historic market
capitalizations. The historical trading relationship between the
Royal Dutch Shares and Shell Transport ordinary shares has
broadly matched the 60/40 ratio. When that relationship deviated
from the 60/40 ratio, it appears to have done so for reasons
external to the Shell Group, such as relative index performance
and taxation changes.
|
|
|
Value Residing in the Parent Companies |
A review was performed by ABN AMRO of Royal Dutch Shell, Royal
Dutch and Shell Transport, the holding companies of the Shell
Group, the purpose of which was to identify any material value
of any assets and liabilities that resided within one or other
company at the Shell Group holding company level and which may,
therefore, have a bearing on the relative apportionment of Royal
Dutch in the Shell Group. This review included a review of
various documents, and discussions with the representatives of,
and advisers to, Royal Dutch Shell, Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport. In particular, ABN AMRO placed reliance on the
confirmations provided to it by Royal Dutch Shell, Royal Dutch
and Shell Transport on October 24, 2005.
The balance sheets of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport were
analyzed in order to determine whether they had a material
bearing on the relative apportionment of Royal Dutch in the
Shell Group. The adjusted net current assets (NCAs)
of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport were relevant for this
analysis because they represented the sum of all line items on
the balance sheets of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport (namely
the current assets and current liabilities) other than the line
items representing Royal Dutchs and Shell Transports
respective investments in Shell Petroleum and SPCo. The line
items representing investments in Shell Petroleum and SPCo were
not relevant for purposes of this analysis as they did not
identify value residing within Royal Dutch Shell, Royal Dutch
and Shell Transport. The review performed of Royal Dutch Shell,
Royal Dutch and Shell Transport did not reveal any material
assets or liabilities that resided solely within Royal Dutch
Shell, Royal Dutch and Shell Transport, whether on or off
balance sheet.
ABN AMRO concluded that, based on the analysis of historical
dividend receipts and payments, share buybacks, trading
relationship and relative adjusted net current assets, the
economic interest of the Minority Holders in Royal Dutch prior
to the Proposed Transaction, being approximately 1.5%, is
equivalent to an interest of approximately 0.9% in Royal Dutch
Shell, as a result of Royal Dutchs 60% economic interest
in the Shell Group.
20
Under the proposed terms of the Merger, based on the par value
of the share capital of Shell Petroleum to which the Minority
Holders and Royal Dutch Shell, respectively, would be entitled,
the Minority Holders would hold, after giving effect to the
Merger, 0.9% of the share capital of Shell Petroleum (before
payment of fractional entitlements). As a result of the Merger,
Shell Petroleum becomes the sole holding company of the Shell
Group below Royal Dutch Shell. Given that Shell Petroleum and
Royal Dutch Shell will be equivalent in value (without taking
into account the interest of the Minority Holders), this 0.9%
interest in Shell Petroleum is equivalent to a 0.9% interest in
Royal Dutch Shell. The Proposed Transaction, therefore, does not
alter the current economic interest of the Minority Holders in
Royal Dutch Shell before payment with respect to fractional
entitlements.
With respect to determining the cash value of the fractional
entitlements, ABN AMRO reviewed precedents of treatment of
fractional entitlements resulting from mergers and share
exchange offers involving Dutch companies to identify Dutch
standard practice for the settlement of fractional entitlements.
Analyses of the standard practice of Dutch banks settling
fractional entitlements resulting from mergers and share
exchange offers, and a subsequent review of eleven precedent
transactions, indicate that fractional entitlements are settled
in cash on the settlement date, usually based on the opening
price of the acquirers shares, or a date/period closely
near that date.
The following transactions were analyzed:
Air France S.A. KLM N.V., 2003
DSM N.V. Gist Brocades N.V., 1998
Getronics N.V. Pink Roccade N.V., 2004
Koninklijke KPN N.V. SNT Group N.V., 2004
Modex Therapeutics S.A. Isotis N.V., 2002
NH Hoteles S.A. Krasnapolsky Hotels and Restaurants
N.V., 2000
Pink Roccade N.V. TAS Groep N.V., 2000
Rodamco Europe N.V. Rodamco Retail Nederland B.V.,
2001
Telefonica S.A. Endemol Entertainment Holding N.V.,
2000
Epicor Software Corporation Scala Business Solution
N.V., 2003
Tiscali S.p.A. WorldOnline International N.V., 2000
Neither the shares of Shell Petroleum nor the shares of Royal
Dutch are expected to be listed at the time when the amounts
payable under the Merger are settled. However, given that
following the Merger, an interest in one Royal Dutch Share
represents the same interest in the Shell Group as two Royal
Dutch Shell shares, Royal Dutch Shell shares would provide an
appropriate reference.
In addition, ABN AMRO analyzed the share price development of
Royal Dutch Shares and Royal Dutch Shell shares. The analysis
showed that Royal Dutch Shares traded substantially in line with
Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares in the period
between July 20, 2005 and August 9, 2005 (being the
close of the subsequent offer acceptance period). After
August 9, 2005, Royal Dutch Shares have traded at a 0-6%
discount relative to Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary
shares. Since (i) 98.5% of the Royal Dutch shareholders
tendered their Royal Dutch Shares and received Royal Dutch Shell
Class A ordinary shares, (ii) Royal Dutch and Royal
Dutch Shell hold an interest in the same economic entity,
(iii) the historic share price development of Royal Dutch
is broadly in line with the historic share price development of
Royal Dutch Shell, and (iv) Royal Dutch Shell is a very
large listed company, well covered by equity analysts, with a
diversified shareholder base and with highly liquid shares, ABN
AMRO concluded that the Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary
share price can be used as a reference instrument on which to
base the settlement price of the fractional entitlements of the
Minority Holders of Royal Dutch.
ABN AMRO reviewed the liquidity of the Royal Dutch Shell
Class A and B ordinary shares and noted that (i) the
Royal Dutch Shell shares have a free float of 100%,
(ii) Royal Dutch Shell is one of the 10 largest companies
in the world by total market capitalization, (iii) Royal
Dutch Shell is widely covered by equity analysts, and
(iv) Royal Dutch Shell shares are traded at three different
stock exchanges. ABN AMRO concluded that market inefficiencies
significantly impacting the Royal Dutch Shell shares are
unlikely and that the market price of Royal Dutch Shell shares
can be used as a reasonable indication of the going concern
value of Royal Dutch Shell, and, given that immediately prior to
the Merger two Royal Dutch Shell shares and one Royal Dutch
21
Share will represent the same economic interest in the Shell
Group, the market price of Royal Dutch Shell shares can be used
as a reasonable indication of the going concern value of Royal
Dutch. Although Royal Dutch Shell Class A and Class B
ordinary shares hold the same economic interest in the Shell
Group, the difference in market prices between these two classes
of shares is likely attributable to the dividend access scheme,
created for tax purposes, in which holders of Royal Dutch Shell
Class B ordinary shares participate, and in which holders
of Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares and Royal
Dutch Shares do not participate.
ABN AMRO understands that Dutch law does not allow for
consideration to be based on a future share price. As a result,
the last possible date for establishing the consideration for
fractional entitlements based on the Royal Dutch Shell
Class A ordinary share price will be the date of signing of
the Merger Proposal (October 31, 2005). According to advice
provided by De Brauw to Royal Dutch Shell, Royal Dutch and
Shell Petroleum, and subsequently reviewed and concurred with by
Freshfields, in squeeze out proceedings under Dutch law,
interest would likely be accrued, at the statutory rate, from
the date of the court decision until the date of payment (minus
any dividends).
|
|
|
Analysis of the consideration that is typically paid to
minority shareholders under Dutch legal squeeze out
proceedings. |
Royal Dutch Shell and Royal Dutch have stated that they decided
to implement the Merger as it is likely to be less time
consuming and procedurally more efficient than statutory squeeze
out proceedings under Dutch law. The Schedule 13D filed
under the Exchange Act with the SEC by Royal Dutch Shell on
September 20, 2005 stated that if the Merger is not
completed as proposed, the Board of Royal Dutch Shell intends to
commence Dutch statutory squeeze out proceedings in order to
acquire the Royal Dutch Shares held by the Minority Holders. A
squeeze out would result in the Minority Holders receiving a
cash payment in exchange for their Royal Dutch Shares.
ABN AMRO analyzed the consideration typically paid to minority
shareholders under a Dutch legal squeeze out procedure following
a cash or share exchange offer. For this analysis, ABN AMRO has
reviewed the following:
|
|
|
|
|
transactions where squeeze outs were preceded by cash offers
with regard to the decision of the court regarding the price,
the date upon which this price was based and any adjustments of
this price; |
|
|
|
transactions where squeeze outs were preceded by share exchange
offers with regard to the consideration paid to the relevant
minority shareholders; |
|
|
|
legal advice on the likely outcome of the price determination by
the Court of Appeal as provided by De Brauw to Royal Dutch
Shell, Royal Dutch and Shell Petroleum, and subsequently
reviewed and concurred with by Freshfields. |
The legal advice provided by De Brauw to Royal Dutch Shell,
Royal Dutch and Shell Petroleum and subsequently reviewed and
concurred with by Freshfields was that, in connection with a
squeeze out under Dutch law, based on precedent transactions
involving earlier exchange offers, it is a near
certainty that a Dutch court would base the price on the
exchange ratio in the Exchange Offer being two Royal Dutch Shell
Class A ordinary shares for every Royal Dutch Share.
However, the De Brauw advice was that it is less clear to
establish which date and time a Dutch court would use to
determine the cash value of the merger consideration, although
most precedent cases seem to pick the date of the
offer becoming unconditional or the date of first settlement
thereafter, without clarification as to the opening or closing
price. The De Brauw advice further stated that in almost all
cases the Dutch court would want to be satisfied that since the
relevant date for determining the cash value of the
consideration, there has been no change in circumstances which
should force the Court to change its determination of the value
of the shares held by the minority shareholders. Finally, the De
Brauw advice stated that in a squeeze out, interest at the
statutory interest rate on the cash amount is payable from the
date when the court determines the valuation, and any dividends
declared after such date and before the date of payment are
deducted from such interest.
In addition, ABN AMRO reviewed the following cash offers and
share exchange offers. ABN AMRO reviewed the cash offers with
regards to the decision of the court regarding the price, the
date upon which this
22
price was based and any adjustments of this price and the share
exchange offers with regard to the consideration paid to the
relevant minority shareholders.
Petroplus International B.V. The Carlyle Group &
Riverstone Holdings LLC, 2005
Scala Business Solutions N.V. Epicor Software
Corporation, 2004
Rodamco Asia N.V. ING Groep N.V., 2004
Euretco B.V. Euretco Holding B.V., 2003
Vendex KBB B.V. VDXK Acquisition B.V., 2004
Nedcon Groep N.V. Voestalpine AG, 2004
Welch Allyn Cardio Control B.V. WelchAllyn
International Holdings Inc, 2004
Krasnapolsky Hotels and Restaurants N.V. NH Hoteles
S.A., 2004
Reckitt Benckiser Holdings B.V. Reckitt Benckiser
N.V., 1999
The precedents used in the review of the cash offers and the
share exchange offers were selected using the following criteria:
|
|
|
|
|
the target company had a Dutch statutory seat; |
|
|
|
the squeeze out was performed under Dutch law; |
|
|
|
the offer and the subsequent squeeze out proceedings were
completed; |
|
|
|
the squeeze out proceedings or the exchange offer took place in
the last five years. |
Based on precedent transactions, ABN AMRO concluded that
typically the consideration under Dutch legal squeeze out
proceedings is based on the date of first settlement or the date
at which the offer is declared unconditional. The date of the
Royal Dutch offer in the Unification Transaction becoming
unconditional (being July 19, 2005) is before the date of
the first listing of the Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary
shares and therefore not applicable. As a result, ABN AMRO
considered July 20, 2005, which is the first date upon with
Royal Dutch Shell shares traded.
Based on information and legal analysis provided by De Brauw to
Royal Dutch Shell, Royal Dutch and Shell Petroleum, and
subsequently concurred with by Freshfields and ABN AMROs
review of precedent transactions, ABN AMRO concluded that in
squeeze out proceedings under Dutch law, it is likely that the
squeeze out price will be deemed to be reasonable if it is equal
in value to the offer consideration in the preceding public
offer. The date and time which would likely be used by the Court
of Appeal to determine the cash value of such offer
consideration would likely be the date of the offer becoming
unconditional or the date of first settlement. However, the
Court of Appeal would want to be satisfied that in the period
between the relevant date for determining the cash value of the
offer consideration and a date shortly before the date of its
decision, there is no relevant change of circumstance which
should force the court to alter such decision. Interest would
likely be accrued, at the statutory rate, from the date of the
court decision until the date of payment (minus any dividends).
ABN AMRO has compared the expected amount of interest that would
accrue with respect to the amount of the Merger Consideration,
based on the Dutch statutory rate of 4% per annum, with the
expected interim dividend that will be paid by Royal Dutch in
respect of the third quarter of
0.46 per share.
ABN AMRO concluded that the amount of interest that would likely
have been received in case of squeeze out proceedings under
Dutch law is likely to be less than the expected third quarter
interim dividend (before the deduction of any withholding tax
from such dividends) if the effective date of the Merger is
prior to January 19, 2006 and that the proposal by Royal
Dutch Shell, in this respect, compares favourably to the
methodology under Dutch legal squeeze out proceedings.
|
|
|
Analysis of the consideration paid to minority shareholders
in precedent unification transactions |
ABN AMRO reviewed the unification of the following former
dual-headed company structures:
|
|
|
ABB Ltd., 1999 |
|
Dexia SA, 1996 |
|
Merita Nordbanken plc, 1999 |
23
ABN AMRO analyzed precedent unification transactions in which
shares of minority shareholders were subsequently acquired by
means of a squeeze out or other corporate restructuring
transactions such as a legal merger in order to analyze the
value which was offered to minority shareholders. ABN AMRO noted
that the reasons for, and circumstances surrounding, each of
these transactions were different and the characteristics of
such transactions and the companies involved were not directly
comparable to Royal Dutch. ABN AMRO concluded that the value of
the offer to the minority shareholders, in the relevant
unification precedent transactions for which sufficient
information was available, was equal to the price which would
likely have been determined under the applicable law for squeeze
out proceedings.
|
|
|
Comparison of the Merger Consideration to the historical
Royal Dutch Share price and net asset value per Royal Dutch
Share |
ABN AMRO reviewed the current and historic share price of Royal
Dutch Shares on Euronext Amsterdam and on the NYSE, as well as
the historic share price of Royal Dutch Shares on Euronext
Amsterdam, the London Stock Exchange (the LSE), and
on the NYSE. ABN AMRO observed that the Royal Dutch Share price
as traded on Euronext Amsterdam has traded at an average share
price of 42.45
since January 1, 2003. The closing share price per
September 30, the last trading day of Royal Dutch on
Euronext Amsterdam, was
51.60. ABN AMRO
observed that, based on the Euro/US dollar spot exchange rate,
Royal Dutch Shares have traded since January 1, 2003 at an
average share price of
42.45 on the
NYSE, with a closing price of
52.22 on
September 30, 2005.
ABN AMRO observed that the Royal Dutch Shell Class A
ordinary shares (or, in respect of the NYSE, ADRs where one ADR
represents two Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares)
as traded on Euronext Amsterdam, the LSE and on NYSE have traded
at an average share price of
26.10,
26.09 and
26.07 (being the
average ADR price divided by two), respectively since
July 20, 2005 (based on the relevant spot exchange rates).
The closing share price on October 28, 2005 is
25.24,
25.19 and
25.53 (being the
ADR price divided by two), respectively (based on the relevant
spot exchange rates).
The Merger Consideration represents a 1.2% premium to the
closing price of Royal Dutch Shares on Euronext on
September 30, 2005, a 23.0% premium to the average price of
Royal Dutch Shares on Euronext from January 1, 2003 to
September 30, 2005, and premiums of 0.6% and 2.8% to two
times the Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary share opening
price and closing price, respectively, on Euronext on
July 20, 2005. Additionally, ABN AMRO noted that the Merger
Consideration represented a premium of 20.7% over the average
euro buyback price for Royal Dutch shares since the beginning of
2004 and 11.2% over the average euro buyback price for Royal
Dutch shares in 2005. For these purposes, buybacks in
U.S. dollars were converted to euro at the prevailing spot
rate on the date of purchase.
ABN AMRO observed that the net assets per share of Royal Dutch,
determined on a parent company-only basis under Dutch GAAP as at
September 30, 2005, was approximately
23.68, and that
the Merger Consideration represents a premium of 120.5% to that
number. ABN AMRO understands from Royal Dutch Shell that 60% of
the consolidated net assets of the Shell Group represents a
reasonable proxy for the consolidated net assets of Royal Dutch
(both on IFRS bases). The consolidated net assets of the Shell
Group on an IFRS basis as at September 30, 2005 were
$99.8 billion, therefore 60% of that figure, or
$59.9 billion, represents an approximation of the Royal
Dutch consolidated net assets as at September 30, 2005 on
an IFRS basis. On a per Royal Dutch share basis, this is
equivalent to approximately $28.93, or
24.03 (converted
at the spot exchange rate as at September 30, 2005). The
Merger Consideration represents a premium of 117.3% to that
number.
|
|
|
(ii) Opinion with respect to whether or not the value of
the Loan Note Consideration, when issued, will be greater
than the value of the Merger Consideration |
In connection with the Proposed Transaction, Royal Dutch
retained ABN AMRO to render an opinion as to whether or not the
value of the sterling-denominated exchangeable loan notes, when
issued, with a sterling face amount (determined based on the
Reuters 3000 Xtra euro sterling spot rate (calculated as the
average of the bid and the ask quotations) determined at or
about 11.00 pm (London time) on the day prior to the effective
date of the Merger) equal to the Merger Consideration (the
Loan Note Consideration), will be greater than
the value of
24
the Merger Consideration. ABN AMRO delivered a written opinion
to the Board of Royal Dutch dated October 31, 2005 that
based upon and subject to the matters considered and the
assumptions and qualifications set forth in the opinion, the
value of the Loan Note Consideration, when issued, will be
not greater than the value of the Merger Consideration.
Regardless of whether Minority Holders receive the Merger
Consideration or the Loan Note Consideration, they will be
entitled to receive the Royal Dutch interim dividend for the
third quarter of 2005 and Interest (if any). The dividend and
Interest are therefore disregarded for the purposes of ABN
AMROs analyses.
The full text of the written opinion of ABN AMRO is attached
hereto as Annex B and sets forth, among other things, the
assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and
limitations on the scope of the review undertaken by ABN AMRO in
rendering its opinion. ABN AMRO provided its opinion to the
Board of Royal Dutch in connection with its evaluation of the
Proposed Transaction and the opinion does not in any way
constitute a recommendation by ABN AMRO to any Royal Dutch
shareholders as to whether such holders should vote for or
against the Merger, whether any Minority Holder should receive
the Merger Consideration or elect to receive the Loan Note
Consideration or how any Minority Holder should otherwise act in
relation to the Proposed Transaction. This summary does not
purport to be a complete description of the opinion or the
analyses performed by ABN AMRO and is qualified by reference to
the written opinion of ABN AMRO set forth in Annex B
hereto, but it does summarize all of the material analyses
performed and presented by ABN AMRO. You are urged to read the
opinion carefully and in its entirety.
The preparation of such an opinion is a complex process
involving various determinations as to the most appropriate and
relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of
those methods to the particular circumstances and, therefore,
such an opinion is not readily susceptible to partial analysis
or summary description. Selecting portions of the analyses or
the summary set forth below, without considering the analyses as
a whole, could create an incomplete or misleading view of the
process underlying the opinion of ABN AMRO. In arriving at its
opinion, ABN AMRO made qualitative judgments as to the
significance and relevance of each analysis and factor that it
considered. Accordingly, ABN AMRO believes that its analyses
must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its
analyses and factors or focusing on selected elements thereof,
without considering all analyses and factors or the narrative
description of the analyses, could create a misleading or
incomplete view of the processes underlying its analyses and
opinion.
The analyses were prepared for the purposes of ABN AMRO
providing its opinion to the Board of Royal Dutch in connection
with its evaluation of the Proposed Transaction and do not
purport to be appraisals or to reflect levels at which Royal
Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares or any other securities
might trade in the future which may be significantly more or
less favorable than as set forth in these analyses.
For the purposes of providing its opinion, ABN AMRO:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed the form of the loan note deed (the Loan
Note Deed) included as an exhibit to the joint
proposal which sets forth the terms of the Merger and which has
been approved by each of the Boards of Royal Dutch and Shell
Petroleum (the Merger Proposal); |
|
|
|
reviewed the loan note document and election forms which are
being separately made available to eligible UK resident Minority
Holders; |
|
|
|
reviewed certain other documents relating to both the
Unification Transaction and the Proposed Transaction; |
|
|
|
participated in discussions with and reviewed information
provided by Royal Dutch Shell, Royal Dutch and its advisers with
respect to matters ABN AMRO believed necessary or appropriate to
its enquiry; and |
|
|
|
performed such other financial reviews and analysis as ABN AMRO,
in its absolute discretion, deemed appropriate. |
ABN AMRO assumed that the loan notes will carry benefits and
risks and be subject to the terms and conditions substantially
as set out in the Loan Note Deed. ABN AMRO also assumed, as
per Royal Dutch Shells stated intention in the loan note
document, that Royal Dutch Shell will exchange all of the loan
notes for Royal
25
Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares on the earliest
possible exchange date, being January 6, 2006 (although ABN
AMRO considered the effect of an exchange or redemption at a
later date). ABN AMRO assumed and relied upon, without
independent verification, the truth, accuracy and completeness
of the information, data, analysis and financial terms provided
to it or used by it, assumed that the same were not misleading
and does not assume or accept any liability or responsibility
for any independent verification of such information or any
independent valuation or appraisal of the Loan Note
Consideration nor was ABN AMRO provided with such valuation or
appraisal. ABN AMRO has not performed any independent valuation
or appraisal of any of the assets, operations or liabilities
(other than the analysis of the Loan Note Consideration for the
purposes of its opinion) of Royal Dutch, Shell Petroleum, Shell
Transport or Royal Dutch Shell, nor was ABN AMRO provided with
such valuation or appraisal. ABN AMRO does not assume or accept
liability or responsibility for (and expresses no view as to)
any such information or assumptions on which it is based. In
preparing its opinion, ABN AMRO received specific confirmation
from senior management of Royal Dutch that the assumptions
specified in its written opinion were reasonable and no
information had been withheld from ABN AMRO that could have
influenced the purport of its opinion or the assumptions on
which it is based.
Further, ABN AMROs opinion is necessarily based on
financial, economic, monetary, market and other conditions,
including those in the securities and oil and gas markets, as in
effect on, and the information made available to ABN AMRO or
used by it up to, the date of the opinion. ABN AMROs
opinion exclusively focuses on whether or not the value of the
Loan Note Consideration, when issued, will be greater than the
value of the Merger Consideration, and does not address any
other issues such as the fairness, from a financial point of
view, of the Loan Note Consideration to the eligible UK resident
Minority Holders who elect to receive the Loan Note
Consideration in lieu of the Merger Consideration, or the
underlying business decision to merge Royal Dutch and Shell
Petroleum or to recommend the Merger or to effect the Merger as
opposed to any other transaction or procedure that would allow
Royal Dutch Shell to acquire Royal Dutch Shares that it does not
already own, or the commercial merits of any of the foregoing or
the prices or volumes at which the shares of Royal Dutch Shell
or any other securities may trade following completion of the
Proposed Transaction. Subsequent developments in the above
mentioned conditions may affect ABN AMROs opinion and the
assumptions made in preparing the opinion and ABN AMRO is not
obliged to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion if such
conditions change.
In rendering its opinion, ABN AMRO has not provided legal,
regulatory, tax, accounting or actuarial advice and accordingly
ABN AMRO does not assume any responsibility or liability in
respect thereof. ABN AMRO did not participate in negotiations
with respect to the terms of the Implementation Agreement or the
terms or conditions of the loan notes. ABN AMRO assumed that the
Proposed Transaction will be consummated on the terms and
conditions as set out in the Implementation Agreement and that
the loan notes issued will be subject to the terms and
conditions as set out in the Loan Note Deed, without any
material changes to, or waiver of, any of those respective terms
or conditions, that the Company will pay a dividend in an amount
equal to 0.46 to
the Royal Dutch shareholders of record prior to the effective
date of the Merger and that the effective date of the Merger
will be no later than December 31, 2005. ABN AMRO has
specifically not considered the individual tax situation of any
of the eligible UK resident Minority Holders, which may or may
not make the election by any of these shareholders to receive
loan notes more or less favorable to them.
As described on page 11 under Special Factors
Purposes, Reasons, Fairness, Alternatives and Effects of
the Proposed Transaction Position on the Fairness of
the Proposed Transaction, the Board of Royal Dutch took
into account a number of factors in evaluating the Loan
Note Consideration and reaching a determination to
recommend the Proposed Transaction, including, but not limited
to, ABN AMROs opinion. Accordingly, ABN AMROs
analyses summarized below should not be viewed as determinative
of the views of the Board of Royal Dutch with respect to the
Proposed Transaction.
ABN AMRO performed the analyses described below for the purposes
of evaluating whether or not the value of the Loan Note
Consideration, when issued, will be greater than the value of
the Merger Consideration. The following is a summary of the
financial analyses performed by ABN AMRO in connection with the
rendering of its opinion.
ABN AMRO determined the value of the Loan
Note Consideration relative to the value of the Merger
Consideration based on (i) analysis of the various price
scenarios of the underlying Royal Dutch Shell Class A
26
ordinary shares; and (ii) analysis of the loan note value
by disaggregation into, and valuation of, its hypothetical
component parts. ABN AMRO also considered the impact on any of
its conclusions of assuming that the loan notes are exchanged or
redeemed later than January 6, 2006 (being the earliest
possible date of exchange).
|
|
|
Analysis of the various price scenarios of the underlying
Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares |
At the date of exchange of the loan notes, the average of the
means of the daily price quotations of a Royal Dutch Shell
Class A ordinary share published in the Daily Official List
of the London Stock Exchange on the three Business Days
immediately preceding the date of exchange (the Market
Price) may be greater than, less than or equal to the
sterling equivalent (determined based on the Reuters 3000
Xtra euro sterling spot rate (calculated as the average of the
bid and the ask quotations) determined at or about 11.00 pm
(London time) on the day prior to the effective date of the
Merger) of the value of half of the Merger Consideration (being
equal to one half of the principal amount of the loan note),
(the Base Price).
Taking each scenario in turn, ABN AMRO made a comparison of, on
the one hand, the value of the Royal Dutch Shell Class A
ordinary shares received following exchange of the loan notes
into Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares, to, on the
other hand, the value that the Minority Holders would otherwise
have received based on a sterling cash amount equal to two times
the Base Price.
|
|
|
|
|
Market Price of Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares
greater than the Base Price: In this scenario, the holder of
a loan note would receive, on the date of exchange, less than
two Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares. Fractions of
Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares would be paid in
cash. The aggregate value of such shares plus any fractions paid
in cash would be equal to the principal amount of the loan note,
which in turn would be equal to two times the Base Price. |
|
|
|
Market Price of Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares
less than the Base Price: In this scenario, the holder of a
loan note would receive, on the date of exchange, two Royal
Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares. The aggregate value of
such shares would be less than the principal amount of the loan
note and therefore less than two times the Base Price. |
|
|
|
Market Price of Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares
equal to the Base Price: In this scenario, the holder of a
loan note would receive, on the date of exchange, two Royal
Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares. The aggregate value of
such shares would be equal to the principal amount of the loan
note, which in turn would be equal to two times the Base Price. |
Under each scenario, the holder of a loan note would receive
accrued interest at an annual rate of LIBOR (as defined in the
Loan Note Deed) minus 1.50 per cent. on the
principal amount, being equal to two times the Base Price, for
the period between the date of issue and the date of exchange.
Under each scenario, had the Minority Holder not elected to
receive the Loan Note Consideration and instead received
the Merger Consideration, such Minority Holder would have been
able to invest the Merger Consideration in order to receive
interest. In ABN AMROs opinion, the yield on an asset swap
basis equivalent on sterling denominated AA-rated notes in the
secondary market will under normal circumstances be no less than
0.50 per cent. below LIBOR. Accordingly, such a Minority
Holder would have, on the date of exchange, the Merger
Consideration plus interest at an annual rate of no less than
LIBOR minus 0.50 per cent. from the date of issue of the
loan notes to the date of exchange into Royal Dutch Shell
Class A ordinary shares.
ABN AMRO concluded that under no Royal Dutch Shell Class A
ordinary share price scenario could the value of the Loan
Note Consideration on the effective date of the Merger
exceed the value of the Merger Consideration.
|
|
|
Analysis of the loan note value by disaggregation into, and
valuation of, its hypothetical component parts |
ABN AMRO believes, given that a loan note holder will not, upon
exchange of the loan note, receive a greater number of Royal
Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares than he would otherwise
have received under the terms of the Exchange Offer, that the
value of the loan note instrument may be considered by
disaggregation into two hypothetical components: (i) the
obligation associated with two written European put
options on Royal
27
Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares, each with a strike
price equal to the Base Price; and (ii) a floating rate
non-exchangeable debt instrument.
ABN AMRO analyzed (i) the value of a hypothetical floating
rate non-exchangeable debt instrument, paying interest at an
annual rate of LIBOR minus 1.50 per cent., to be
redeemed at par on the date of exchange (assumed to be
January 6, 2006) by discounting the negative spread of 150
basis points over the zero coupon swap curve; and (ii) the
value of two hypothetical European put options over
Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares, each with a
strike price equal to the Base Price and an assumed expiry date
of January 6, 2006 by application of the Black-Scholes
valuation technique, both being subject to relevant respective
terms and conditions of the loan notes as set out in the Loan
Note Deed.
ABN AMRO established that the value of such a hypothetical
floating rate non-exchangeable debt instrument would be less
than par value. Furthermore, ABN AMRO established that the
obligation associated with such hypothetical written
European put options would confer a negative value
to the loan note holder. ABN AMRO therefore concluded that the
value of the loan note, calculated as the sum of the value of
the two hypothetical components, would not exceed the value of a
cash amount equal to two times the Base Price and, accordingly,
that the value of the Loan Note Consideration, when issued,
would not exceed the value of the Merger Consideration.
Furthermore, ABN AMRO considered the impact on the value of the
loan notes of assuming that the exchange of the loan notes into
Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares takes place later
than the earliest possible date of exchange (being
January 6, 2006). ABN AMRO considered the increased period
during which a loan note holder would earn interest at an annual
rate of 1.50 per cent. below LIBOR and concluded that
under such a scenario the value to the holder of the
hypothetical floating rate non-exchangeable debt instrument
would be lower than in the event of exchange taking place on
January 6, 2006. ABN AMRO also considered the extended
tenor of the hypothetical written European put
options and concluded that under such a scenario the duration
over which the loan note holder would be exposed to the
obligation would be longer and therefore the value of such
obligation would be lower (i.e. more negative) than in the event
of the exchange taking place on January 6, 2006. ABN AMRO
therefore concluded that if the exchange of the loan notes into
Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares were to take
place later than at the earliest possible date of exchange
(being January 6, 2006), then the value of the Loan
Note Consideration would be relatively lower.
Finally, ABN AMRO considered the impact on the value of the loan
notes assuming that a redemption of the loan notes, in full at
par, takes place. In the event of a redemption of the loan
notes, the loan note holder would receive, in total, cash equal
to the loan note principal (equal to two times the Base Price),
plus interest at an annual rate of 1.50 per cent.
below LIBOR for the period between issue and redemption. For the
purposes of this analysis, and in the context of the interest
received over at least one year from the date of issue, ABN AMRO
assumed that any impact of the option (of the loan note holder)
to receive pounds sterling or euro at the time of redemption was
de minimis. ABN AMRO concluded, by reference to the zero coupon
swap curve, that the value of the Loan Note Consideration in the
event of redemption, would be less than par.
Pursuant to the opinion letters and the engagement letter
between Royal Dutch and ABN AMRO, the opinions as well as the
relationship between ABN AMRO and the Board of Royal Dutch are
governed by Dutch law and the Dutch courts have exclusive
jurisdiction thereover.
The Board of Royal Dutch selected ABN AMRO as Royal Dutchs
financial advisor based on ABN AMROs qualifications,
expertise and reputation. ABN AMRO is an internationally
recognized investment banking and financial advisory firm. As
part of its investment banking and financial advisory business,
ABN AMRO is continuously involved in the valuation of businesses
and their securities in connection with mergers and
acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, competitive biddings,
secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities,
private placements and valuations for corporate and other
purposes. ABN AMRO is acting as financial advisor to Royal Dutch
in connection with the Proposed Transaction, and will receive a
fee of 500,000
for rendering the opinions, which was payable upon the delivery
by ABN AMRO of the opinions. The fee amount was agreed upon
following negotiation. Royal Dutch has also agreed to reimburse
ABN AMRO for reasonable
28
out of pocket expenses incurred by ABN AMRO in performing its
services, including the fees and expenses of legal counsel, and,
subject to the terms of ABN AMROs letter of engagement, to
indemnify ABN AMRO and related persons and entities against
liabilities, including liabilities under U.S. Federal securities
laws, relating to or arising from ABN AMROs engagement.
From time to time ABN AMRO and its affiliates have also
(i) maintained banking relationships with members of the
Shell Group, including overdraft facilities and intraday
facilities related to cash management and project financing,
(ii) provided investment banking services such as mergers
and acquisitions advice and (iii) executed transactions,
for their own account or for the accounts of customers, in the
Royal Dutch Shares, Shell Transport shares or Royal Dutch Shell
Class A ordinary shares or the Royal Dutch Shell
Class B ordinary shares or debt securities in any of the
foregoing and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short
position in such securities. ABN AMRO is a holder of Royal Dutch
Shell shares. In connection with the Proposed Transaction, ABN
AMRO has been retained by Shell Petroleum to act as exchange
agent in connection with the Merger. For its role as exchange
agent, Shell Petroleum has agreed to pay ABN AMRO
500,000 (which
may be adjusted depending on the number of Minority Holders
holding bearer shares that elect to receive loan notes and as a
result of other significant unforeseen costs), payable after the
effective date of the Merger. Shell Petroleum has also agreed to
reimburse ABN AMRO for reasonable out of pocket expenses
incurred by ABN AMRO in performing its services as exchange
agent, including the fees and expenses of legal counsel, and,
subject to the terms of ABN AMROs letter of engagement, to
indemnify ABN AMRO and related persons and entities against
liabilities, including liabilities under U.S. Federal securities
laws, relating to or arising from ABN AMROs engagement.
ABN AMRO acted as financial advisor to Royal Dutch in connection
with the Unification Transaction and delivered to the Managing
and Supervisory Boards of Royal Dutch a written opinion (and a
subsequent bring down opinion) with respect to the fairness,
from a financial point of view, of the exchange ratio in the
Exchange Offer. ABN AMRO received a fee of
2 million
in connection with its role as Royal Dutchs financial
advisor in the Unification Transaction and approximately
8 million
in connection with its role as Dutch exchange agent and
co-listing agent in the Unification Transaction. In the past two
years, the aggregate compensation received by ABN AMRO and its
affiliates from Royal Dutch Shell, Royal Dutch, Shell Petroleum
and Shell Transport and their affiliates was approximately
18 million
(which includes the payment of
500,000 made
upon delivery of ABN AMROs opinions dated October 31,
2005).
Jonkheer Aarnout Loudon, who is a member of the Royal Dutch
Shell Board, and the Royal Dutch Board, is Chairman of the
Supervisory Board of ABN AMRO Holding N.V., the parent company
of ABN AMRO. Jonkheer Aarnout Loudon has not been involved in
the decisions by Royal Dutch and ABN AMRO in connection with the
services provided by ABN AMRO to Royal Dutch or Royal Dutch
Shell.
(b) Reports
of independent accountants
Under Dutch law, the Boards of Royal Dutch and Shell Petroleum
are required to receive certain certifications and reports from
independent accounting firms in connection with the Proposed
Transaction. Both of the Boards are required pursuant to
section 2:328 paragraph 1 of the Dutch Civil Code to
receive certifications from independent accountants that they
have each examined the Merger Proposal (defined below) and
certified that the Exchange Ratio is reasonable and that the
equity of Royal Dutch as of September 30, 2005 was at least
equal to the nominal value of the aggregate number of shares to
be allotted by Shell Petroleum pursuant to the Exchange Ratio
plus the cash payments and loan notes issued for fractional
entitlements, based on generally accepted valuation methods in
The Netherlands. Such firms must also provide reports pursuant
to section 2:328 paragraph 2 of the Dutch Civil Code
stating the valuation method used by management to determine the
Exchange Ratio is in accordance with Dutch legal requirements.
Deloitte and E&Y, the independent audit firms engaged by the
Boards of Royal Dutch and Shell Petroleum, respectively, have
provided such certifications and reports.
Additionally, the Board of Royal Dutch is required to receive a
certification pursuant to section 2:94b, subsection 2
of the Dutch Civil Code from an independent accounting firm that
it has examined the issuance of Royal Dutch Shares for the
contribution in kind of Shell Transport and certified that the
value of the Shell
29
Transport shares is sufficient to meet the payment obligation
for such issuance based on generally accepted accounting and
valuation principles. The Board of Royal Dutch will receive this
certification from Deloitte on or prior to the date of the EGM.
Ernst & Young Accountants, The Netherlands, is the
Dutch member firm of the Ernst & Young network, one of
the largest global independent accounting firms. In the past two
years Ernst & Young Accountants and other
Ernst & Young member firms have provided the Shell
Group with a number of services including assurance, consulting,
mergers and acquisitions advice and advisory work in regard to
compliance with the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act. For all of
these services, the firm received a fee commensurate with the
market rate for these services.
Deloitte Accountants B.V. is a separate and independent member
firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, a Swiss Verein (Company). The
member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu form one of the largest
global professional services organizations, providing audit,
tax, consulting and financial advisory services. In the past two
years it has provided the Shell Group with a number of services
including consulting, mergers and acquisitions advice and
advisory work in regard to compliance with the
U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act. For all of these services, the
firm received a fee commensurate with the market rate for these
services.
Deloitte and E&Y will each receive approximately $250,000 in
connection with the certifications and reports referred to above.
Neither Deloitte nor E&Y are the auditors of the Shell
Groups financial statements.
|
|
5. |
Intentions of Royal Dutch Shell with Regard to Royal Dutch
and Shell Petroleum |
Upon completion of the Merger, Shell Petroleum will be the
surviving entity and Royal Dutch and the Royal Dutch Shares will
cease to exist. The management of Shell Petroleum will continue
as the management of the merged entity.
Subject to any efficiencies realized as part of the Proposed
Transaction, Royal Dutch Shell expects that following the
Proposed Transaction the Shell Group will operate its businesses
on a basis substantially consistent with its current operations.
Royal Dutch Shell intends to evaluate the business and
operations of Shell Petroleum and the Shell Group on an ongoing
basis with a view to maximizing its potential, and Royal Dutch
Shell will take such actions as it deems appropriate under the
circumstances and market conditions then existing.
Upon completion of the Merger, trading of Royal Dutch Shares
will cease, the registration of the Royal Dutch Shares under the
Exchange Act will be terminated and Shell Petroleum, as the
successor of Royal Dutch, will not be subject to the periodic
reporting obligations of the Exchange Act or otherwise be
subject to the U.S. Federal securities laws applicable to
public companies.
Except as otherwise described in this Disclosure Document, Royal
Dutch has not, and Royal Dutch Shell and Shell Petroleum have
not, as of the date of this Disclosure Document, approved any
specific plans or proposals for:
|
|
|
|
|
any extraordinary corporate transaction involving Shell
Petroleum after the completion of the Proposed Transaction; |
|
|
|
any sale or transfer of a material amount of assets currently
held by Royal Dutch after the completion of the Proposed
Transaction; |
|
|
|
any change in the board of directors or management of Shell
Petroleum; or |
|
|
|
any material change in Shell Petroleums dividend policy,
indebtedness, capitalization, corporate structure or business
after the completion of the Proposed Transaction. |
30
III. COMPANIES INVOLVED
|
|
1. |
Description of Royal Dutch Shell and Shell Petroleum |
(a) Royal
Dutch Shell
Royal Dutch Shell was incorporated in England and Wales on
February 5, 2002, as a private company limited by shares
under the name Forthdeal Limited. On October 27, 2004,
Royal Dutch Shell re-registered as a public company limited by
shares and changed its name to Royal Dutch Shell plc. Royal
Dutch Shells primary object is to carry on the business of
a holding company.
Pursuant to the Unification Transaction, Royal Dutch Shell
became the parent company of Royal Dutch, Shell Transport and,
through Royal Dutch and Shell Transport, the Shell Group. As a
result of the Exchange Offer, including the subsequent offer
acceptance period, Royal Dutch Shell acquired, and currently
holds, approximately 98.5% of the Royal Dutch Shares.
Present in more than 140 countries and territories around the
world, the companies of the Shell Group are engaged in the
business of Exploration & Production, Gas &
Power, Oil Products, Chemicals and Other industry segments
including Shell Renewables and Hydrogen.
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration & Production: Searching for, finding
and producing crude oil and natural gas. Building and operating
the infrastructure needed to deliver hydrocarbons to market. |
|
|
|
Gas & Power: Liquefying and transporting natural
gas, developing gas markets and infrastructure including
gas-fired power plants and engaging in the marketing and trading
of natural gas and electricity. Converting natural gas to
liquids to provide clean fuels. |
|
|
|
Oil Products: Marketing transportation fuels, lubricants
and specialty products. Refining, supplying, trading and
shipping crude oil and petroleum products. |
|
|
|
Chemicals: Producing and selling petrochemicals to
industrial customers globally. |
|
|
|
Other industry segments comprise technical consultancy services,
Shell Renewables and Hydrogen. |
Royal Dutch Shell is registered at Companies House, Cardiff with
company number 04366849, and the Chamber of Commerce,
The Hague under number 34179503. Royal Dutch
Shells registered office is at Shell Centre, London,
SE1 7NA, UK and its headquarters are at Carel van
Bylandtlaan 30, 2596 HR The Hague,
The Netherlands. Tel.:
+31 (0) 70 377 9111. Royal Dutch Shell is
considered a resident of The Netherlands for Dutch and UK tax
purposes.
Royal Dutch Shell is the beneficial owner of 2,038,380,043 Royal
Dutch Shares, representing approximately 98.5% of the
outstanding Royal Dutch Shares. As used in this Disclosure
Document, beneficial ownership has the meaning
provided in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act.
(b) Shell
Petroleum
Shell Petroleum was incorporated on June 28, 1907, under
the laws of The Netherlands. The address of Shell
Petroleums registered office, head office and principal
place of business is at Carel van Bylandtlaan 30,
2596 HR The Hague, The Netherlands. Tel.:
+31 (0) 70 377 9111.
Under the holding structure of the Shell Group prior to the
Proposed Transaction, Shell Transport and Royal Dutch own 40%
and 60%, respectively, of each of Shell Petroleum and SPCo.
Shell Petroleum and SPCo currently hold the interests of the
operating companies of the Shell Group. Shell Petroleum is the
beneficial owner of 100 Royal Dutch Shares.
(c) Securities
Proceedings
Except as disclosed herein, none of Royal Dutch Shell, Shell
Petroleum, Royal Dutch or to the knowledge of Royal Dutch Shell,
Shell Petroleum and Royal Dutch, the persons listed in
Schedule I, has been convicted in a criminal proceeding
during the past five years (excluding traffic violations or
similar misdemeanors), or has been
31
party to any judicial or administrative proceeding during the
past five years that resulted in a judgment, decree or final
order enjoining such person for future violations of, or
prohibiting activities subject to, U.S. Federal or state
securities laws, or a finding of any violation of
U.S. Federal or state securities laws.
The SEC and UK Financial Services Authority (the
FSA) issued formal orders of private investigation
in relation to the reserves recategorization which Royal Dutch
and Shell Transport resolved by reaching agreements with the SEC
and the FSA as announced on August 24, 2004. In connection
with the agreement with the SEC, Royal Dutch and Shell Transport
consented, without admitting or denying the SECs findings
or conclusions, to an administrative order finding that Royal
Dutch and Shell Transport violated, and requiring Royal Dutch
and Shell Transport to cease and desist from future violations
of, the antifraud, reporting, recordkeeping and internal control
provisions of the U.S. Federal securities laws and related
SEC rules, agreed to pay a $120 million civil penalty and
undertook to spend an additional $5 million developing a
comprehensive internal compliance program. In connection with
the agreement with the FSA, Royal Dutch and Shell Transport
agreed, without admitting or denying the FSAs findings or
conclusions, to the entry of a Final Notice by the FSA finding
that Royal Dutch and Shell Transport breached market abuse
provisions of the UKs Financial Services and Markets Act
2000 (FSMA) and the Listing Rules made under it and
agreed to pay a penalty of £17 million. The penalties
from the SEC and FSA and the additional amount to develop a
comprehensive internal compliance program have been paid by
Shell Group companies and fully included in the Income Statement
of Royal Dutch for the year 2004. The United States Department
of Justice commenced a criminal investigation but announced on
June 29, 2005 that it had made a determination not to
prosecute. Euronext Amsterdam, the Dutch Authority for the
Financial Markets (AFM) and the California
Department of Corporations are investigating the issues related
to the reserves recategorization. The AFM has announced that
their findings do not give rise to any further action from their
side at this time. Management of the Shell Group cannot
currently predict the manner and timing of the resolution of
these pending matters and is currently unable to estimate the
range of reasonably possible losses from such matters.
|
|
2. |
Description of Royal Dutch and the Royal Dutch Shares |
Royal Dutch was incorporated on June 16, 1890, under the
laws of The Netherlands. The address of Royal Dutchs
registered office, head office and principal place of business
is at Carel van Bylandtlaan 30, 2596 HR The Hague, The
Netherlands. Tel.: +31 (0) 70 377 9111.
Royal Dutch does not engage in operational activities. It
derives the whole of its income except for interest
income on cash balances or short-term investments
from its interests in the Shell Group. Royal Dutch is the
subject company in the Proposed Transaction.
Prior to the Unification Transaction, the principal trading
markets for Royal Dutch Shares were Euronext Amsterdam and the
NYSE. The Royal Dutch Shares were delisted from Euronext
Amsterdam on September 30, 2005. Royal Dutch Shares in New
York registry form are listed and traded on the NYSE under the
symbol RD. At Royal Dutch Shells request, on
August 11, 2005, Royal Dutch filed an application with the
SEC to delist the Royal Dutch Shares from the NYSE. The NYSE
halted trading in Royal Dutch Shares on October 3, 2005 and
stated that it would consider the appropriateness of reopening
trading in Royal Dutch shares when further information regarding
the Merger, including the compensation to be paid to Minority
Holders, is made available. The NYSE resumed trading in Royal
Dutch Shares on October 31, 2005, following the joint
public announcement by Royal Dutch Shell and Royal Dutch of the
definitive terms of the Proposed Transaction, including the
Merger Consideration. The NYSE has stated that it expects to
trade Royal Dutch Shares until either the SEC approves Royal
Dutchs application to delist the Royal Dutch Shares from
the NYSE or the completion of Merger.
32
The following table presents the high and low prices of Royal
Dutch Shares in New York registry form on the NYSE for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYSE (in U.S. dollars) | |
|
|
Calendar Year |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
46.88 |
|
|
|
36.69 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
49.81 |
|
|
|
40.56 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
46.79 |
|
|
|
42.84 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
52.70 |
|
|
|
43.95 |
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
54.00 |
|
|
|
45.79 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
53.24 |
|
|
|
47.48 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
53.82 |
|
|
|
48.94 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
57.79 |
|
|
|
51.63 |
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
65.11 |
|
|
|
55.37 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
66.29 |
|
|
|
56.28 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
67.45 |
|
|
|
59.65 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter (October 31 to November 11, 2005)
|
|
|
62.79 |
|
|
|
60.68 |
|
On November 11, 2005, the closing price of Royal Dutch
Shares in New York registry form on the NYSE was $60.93 per
Royal Dutch Share.
The following table presents the high and low prices of Royal
Dutch Shares on Euronext Amsterdam for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euronext Amsterdam (in euro) | |
|
|
Calendar Year |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
44.58 |
|
|
|
33.35 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
42.15 |
|
|
|
36.56 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
42.09 |
|
|
|
37.45 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
41.85 |
|
|
|
37.01 |
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
42.43 |
|
|
|
36.59 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
43.94 |
|
|
|
38.02 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
43.63 |
|
|
|
39.96 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
44.03 |
|
|
|
41.17 |
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
49.33 |
|
|
|
41.84 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
54.90 |
|
|
|
44.66 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
56.75 |
|
|
|
48.00 |
|
On September 30, 2005, the closing price of Royal Dutch
Shares on Euronext Amsterdam was
51.60 per Royal
Dutch Share.
33
The following table presents the dividend paid or payable on
Royal Dutch Shares, on the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend | |
|
U.S. $ | |
Dates |
|
() | |
|
equivalent* | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 6 (Final Dividend for 2002)
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
September 17 (Interim Dividend for 2003)
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 6 (Second Interim Dividend for 2003)
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
September 15 (Interim Dividend for 2004)
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 15 (Second Interim Dividend for 2004)
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
June 15 (First Interim Dividend for 2005)
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
September 15 (Second Interim Dividend for 2005)
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
December 15 (Third Interim Dividend for 2005
payable on December 15, 2005)
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
* |
Rounded to two decimal places. |
There are no current restrictions on the ability of Royal Dutch
to pay dividends nor is it intended that any restrictions be
imposed prior to the Merger.
Prior to the Unification Transaction, Royal Dutch and other
members of the Shell Group engaged in buybacks of Royal Dutch
Shares on the open market. These buybacks were conducted in both
euro and U.S. dollars. The following tables present the
total, average, high and low prices for each quarter of the past
two years. No buybacks have been conducted since the first
quarter of 2005. U.S. dollar prices have been translated at
the noon buying rate as certified by the U.S. Federal
Reserve for customs purposes on the date of purchase. (The table
excludes purchases, totalling approximately 200,000 Royal Dutch
Shares purchased in the period from October 1, 2003 to the
end of the Unification Transaction, made for immediate delivery
under employee share plans which are not held as treasury
shares.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
Average | |
|
|
Purchased | |
|
Price | |
|
Price | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
31.44 |
|
|
|
31.44 |
|
|
|
31.44 |
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
8,002,000 |
|
|
|
40.78 |
|
|
|
41.92 |
|
|
|
41.36 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
13,270,000 |
|
|
|
40.08 |
|
|
|
42.78 |
|
|
|
41.12 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
4,880,000 |
|
|
|
45.42 |
|
|
|
48.59 |
|
|
|
46.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
26,152,464 |
|
|
|
31.44 |
|
|
|
48.59 |
|
|
|
42.28 |
|
34
3. Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
Charges and Net Book Value
The following table sets forth, on a U.S. GAAP basis and,
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, also on an
IFRS basis, the consolidated unaudited ratio of earnings to
fixed charges of Royal Dutch for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges(a)
(U.S. GAAP basis)
|
|
|
21.64 |
|
|
|
15.58 |
|
|
|
11.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges(a)
(IFRS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges(a)
(U.S. GAAP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For the purposes of this table, earnings consists of
pre-tax income from continuing operations before adjustment for
minority interest and income from equity investees plus fixed
charges (excluding capitalized interest) less undistributed
earnings of equity investees, plus distributed income from
equity interests. Fixed charges consists of expensed
and capitalized interest plus interest within rental expenses
plus preference security dividend requirements of consolidated
subsidiaries. |
The book value per Royal Dutch Share as of September 30,
2005 was $25.59 and $23.87 under IFRS and US GAAP,
respectively, which is calculated based on equity attributable
to Royal Dutch under IFRS and US GAAP, respectively, of
$52,967 million and $49,394 million, respectively, and
2,069,520,000 Royal Dutch Shares outstanding as of such date.
For further information, see the Audited Combined Financial
Statements of Royal Dutch for the Year Ended December 31,
2004, and the Unaudited Combined Financial Statements of Royal
Dutch for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005,
attached hereto.
|
|
4. |
Interest of the Filing Companies in Royal Dutch |
As a result of the Exchange Offer, including the subsequent
offer acceptance period, Royal Dutch Shell acquired beneficial
ownership of 2,038,380,043 Royal Dutch Shares, or approximately
98.5% of the Royal Dutch Shares outstanding. Holders who
exchanged Royal Dutch Shares in the Exchange Offer received two
Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares (or one ADR) for
each Royal Dutch Share so exchanged. Royal Dutch Shell did not
exchange and does not intend to seek delivery of, and therefore
disclaims beneficial ownership of, 2,982,288 Royal Dutch Shares
in New York registry form tendered in the initial acceptance
period and 4,295,470 Royal Dutch Shares in New York registry
form tendered in the subsequent offer acceptance period via the
guaranteed delivery procedure, but not delivered to the
U.S. exchange agent in respect of the initial acceptance
period or subsequent offer acceptance period as required by the
Prospectus. Royal Dutch Shell, Shell Petroleum and Royal Dutch
beneficially own 100 Royal Dutch Shares (which are included
in the above total) that were purchased by Shell Group companies
in May 2003 at a price of $44.73. Royal Dutch holds 1,200,000
Royal Dutch Shares, which are not included in the number of
shares outstanding. Such shares will lapse upon the Merger.
Shell Petroleum paid Royal Dutch dividends of
3.4 billion,
3.6 billion
and
7.0 billion
in 2003, 2004 and 2005 (to date), respectively. Royal Dutch
Shell received a dividend of
0.9 billion
in September 2005 from Royal Dutch and will receive a dividend
payment of
0.9 billion
in December 2005.
Except as described above at the time of the publication of this
Disclosure Document, none of Royal Dutch Shell, Shell Petroleum
or Royal Dutch holds, directly or indirectly, any interest, or
is attributed any voting rights, in Royal Dutch.
In particular, except as described in this Disclosure Document:
(i) none of Royal Dutch Shell, Shell Petroleum or Royal
Dutch or, to the best knowledge of Royal Dutch Shell, Shell
Petroleum and Royal Dutch, any of the persons listed in
Schedule 1 hereto or any associate or majority-owned
subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell or any of the persons so listed
in Schedule 1 hereto, beneficially owns any Royal Dutch
Shares; and
35
(ii) none of Royal Dutch Shell, Shell Petroleum or Royal
Dutch or, to the best knowledge of Royal Dutch Shell, Shell
Petroleum and Royal Dutch, any of the persons listed in
Schedule 1 hereto nor any associate or majority-owned
subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell or pension, profit-sharing or
similar plan of Royal Dutch, Royal Dutch Shell or Shell
Petroleum, has effected any transaction in the Royal Dutch
Shares during the 60 days prior to the filing of this
Disclosure Document by Royal Dutch Shell, Shell Petroleum and
Royal Dutch.
Except as described in this Disclosure Document, none of Royal
Dutch Shell, Shell Petroleum or Royal Dutch nor, to the best
knowledge of Royal Dutch Shell, Shell Petroleum and Royal Dutch,
any of the persons listed in Schedule 1 hereto, has any
agreement, arrangement or understanding with any other person
with respect to the securities of Royal Dutch.
Except as described in this Disclosure Document, there have been
no material contacts, negotiations or transactions within the
past two years between Royal Dutch Shell or Shell Petroleum or,
to the best knowledge of Royal Dutch Shell, Shell Petroleum or
Royal Dutch, any of the persons listed in Schedule 1
hereto, on the one hand, and Royal Dutch and/or its affiliates
(or any person not affiliated with Royal Dutch who would have a
direct interest in such matters), on the other hand, concerning
a merger, consolidation or acquisition, takeover offer or other
acquisition of securities, an election of directors or a sale or
other transfer of a material amount of assets of Royal Dutch.
IV. THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION
1. Overview of the Proposed
Transaction
Royal Dutch Shell proposes to engage in certain transactions
that would reorganize the ownership interests of Royal Dutch
Shell and certain of its subsidiaries into a Dutch fiscal group
and a UK fiscal group. As part of these transactions, Royal
Dutch will merge into Shell Petroleum through a statutory merger
under Dutch law on a basis whereby each Minority Holder would be
entitled to receive the Merger Consideration per Royal Dutch
Share held by such holder immediately prior to the Merger.
On October 31, 2005, Royal Dutch Shell, Royal Dutch, Shell
Petroleum, Shell Transport and SPCo entered into an
Implementation Agreement in respect of the Proposed Transaction,
setting forth, inter alia, the conditions to and conduct
of the Proposed Transaction. Pursuant to the Implementation
Agreement, the parties agreed, subject to its directors
fiduciary duties, to use all reasonable endeavors to procure the
satisfaction of the conditions to the Proposed Transaction and
to implement the Proposed Transaction as set out in the
agreement.
Pursuant to the Implementation Agreement, the completion of the
Proposed Transaction is subject to certain conditions, including
the requirement for a resolution to be passed approving the
Merger by a two-thirds majority vote at an EGM where 75% of the
issued share capital is represented. Royal Dutch Shell intends
to vote its entire shareholding interest (approximately 98.5%)
in favor of the Merger as well as any other items related to the
Proposed Transaction which are put to a vote at the EGM, and,
accordingly, the Merger and all such items can be adopted
without the vote of the Minority Holders. Shareholders of Royal
Dutch have been notified of the Merger through press releases,
and for registered holders by a letter from the Chief Executive
of Royal Dutch. Royal Dutch will convene the EGM for
December 16, 2005, at 2.00 pm Central European time,
at Carel van Bylandtlaan 16, 2596 HR The Hague,
The Netherlands. Shareholders of Royal Dutch will
separately be provided notice of the EGM and proxy materials, in
accordance with Dutch requirements and applicable NYSE
requirements, that solicit their vote on the Merger and the
other items to be voted upon at the EGM. The Proposed
Transaction is also subject to the other conditions set out in
Section IV.2, The Proposed Transaction
Conditions to the Proposed Transaction. If the Proposed
Transaction is not completed before January 1, 2006, the
Implementation Agreement may be terminated by Royal Dutch Shell
or Royal Dutch. If the Implementation Agreement is so
terminated, the parties thereto are obligated to take all
reasonable steps to effectively reverse any steps taken in the
Proposed Transaction, to the extent legally permissible and as
determined by the parties to be practicable in the circumstances.
36
The Proposed Transaction will unwind the cross-holdings of Royal
Dutch and Shell Transport in Shell Petroleum and SPCo through
the following steps:
|
|
|
(a) Shell Transport will receive newly issued bonus shares
in SPCo and Royal Dutch shall consent and take other necessary
actions to allow Shell Transport to be registered as holder of
such shares. As consideration for Royal Dutch consenting and
taking such actions, Shell Transport will transfer to Royal
Dutch the entire interest in Shell Petroleum held by Shell
Transport (other than four B shares that Shell Transport will
retain for U.S. tax purposes); |
|
|
(b) Royal Dutch will issue new Royal Dutch Shares to Royal
Dutch Shell and, in consideration for such issue, Royal Dutch
Shell shall contribute to Royal Dutch all of its shares in Shell
Transport; |
|
|
(c) Royal Dutch will contribute its remaining SPCo shares
to its subsidiary Shell Transport; and |
|
|
(d) upon completion of the above steps, Shell Petroleum and
Royal Dutch will effect the Merger, following which Shell
Petroleum will be the surviving entity and Royal Dutch and the
Royal Dutch Shares will cease to exist. |
In connection with the Merger, the articles of association of
Royal Dutch will be amended shortly before the Merger to
reclassify the share capital of Royal Dutch into three classes:
X shares held by Royal Dutch Shell, Y shares held by
eligible UK resident Minority Holders electing to receive loan
notes and ordinary shares held by Royal Dutch Shell and Minority
Holders receiving cash. As described above, in the event the
Merger is not completed before January 1, 2006 and the
Implementation Agreement is terminated, the parties are
obligated to take all reasonable steps to effectively reverse
any steps taken in the Proposed Transaction to the extent
legally permissable and as determined by the parties to be
practicable in the circumstances. In that circumstance, the
Royal Dutch articles of association could be amended to return
to the original articles of association with the vote of a
majority of the share capital voting together, so that the vote
of the Royal Dutch Shares held by Royal Dutch Shell would
control the outcome.
The terms of the Merger are set forth in the Merger Proposal and
the explanation to the Merger Proposal signed by each member of
the Boards of Royal Dutch and Shell Petroleum. Under the terms
of the Merger, a holder of Royal Dutch Shares will be allotted
one Class A share of Shell Petroleum for every 31,978,937
Royal Dutch Shares held by such holder. Any holder that has been
allotted 105 Class A shares will then be allotted one
Class B share of Shell Petroleum for 28,521,530 Royal Dutch
Shares held by it and then further Class A shares. In
accordance with Dutch law, any shareholder who holds a
fractional entitlement is only entitled to receive financial
consideration for their fractional entitlements. Pursuant to the
Merger Proposal, a holder of Royal Dutch Shares who is allotted
a Class B share of Shell Petroleum in accordance with the
foregoing, will not receive any consideration for further Royal
Dutch Shares it holds. Further, Dutch law requires in this case
that the Exchange Ratio (including the financial consideration)
must be determined no later than on the date of signing of the
Merger Proposal.
The Proposed Transaction was structured, and the Exchange Ratio
was determined, so that Royal Dutch Shell would receive shares
in Shell Petroleum and all Minority Holders would be entitled to
fractional entitlements. At the time the Merger is consummated,
Royal Dutch Shell will be the holder of 3,418,059,943 Royal
Dutch Shares and will be entitled to 105 Class A shares of
Shell Petroleum and one Class B share of Shell Petroleum.
Collectively, the Minority Holders hold less than 31,978,937
Royal Dutch Shares. Therefore, none of the Minority Holders will
be entitled to either a Class A or Class B share of
Shell Petroleum and instead each of the Minority Holders will be
entitled to the Merger Consideration for their Royal Dutch
Shares (or, in the case of eligible UK resident holders who
so elect, exchangeable loan notes).
Persons who at the time of the Merger becoming effective, have
unexpired share subscription rights or option rights shall upon
exercise thereof be compensated therefor in cash as of the
Merger becoming effective; the amount shall be determined in
accordance with section 2:320 paragraph 2 of the Dutch
Civil Code.
Each Minority Holder will be entitled to receive for their Royal
Dutch Shares cash equivalent to the Merger Consideration.
Holders of Royal Dutch Shares on the applicable record date will
also receive the Royal Dutch interim dividend for the third
quarter of 2005 of
0.46 per share
(or $0.5556 per share for holders of New York
37
registered shares), which will be payable on December 15,
2005. As in Dutch statutory squeeze out proceedings, the terms
of the Merger provide (a) for interest to accrue on the
Merger Consideration at the statutory rate of 4% per annum until
the effective date of the Merger (expected to be
December 21, 2005), as part of the consideration under the
Merger, and (b) for any dividends payable in that period
(before the deduction of any withholding tax from such dividend)
to be deducted from that interest amount. As the interim
dividend will exceed the amount of interest accrued at 4% per
annum from October 31, 2005 to December 21, 2005 (the
expected effective date of the Merger), no Interest is expected
to be payable.
Payments to holders of New York registered shares will be made
in U.S. dollars based on the noon buying rate for euro in
the City of New York for cable transfers as certified for
customs purposes and as announced by the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York on the business day prior to the effective date of the
Merger (which is expected to be December 21, 2005).
Payments to holders of Hague registered or bearer shares will be
made in euro. Minority Holders that are eligible
UK residents and that have given appropriate
representations will be entitled to elect to receive certain
exchangeable loan notes in lieu of, and in a sterling principal
amount equivalent to, the aggregate Merger Consideration such
holders would otherwise receive. Eligible holders who so elect
will also be entitled to receive payment of the interim dividend
and Interest, if any. Information regarding the exchangeable
loan notes will be separately made available to eligible
UK resident holders.
Payment of the Merger Consideration (and Interest, if any) will
be made by Shell Petroleum. For New York registered Royal Dutch
Shares held through a bank or broker account utilizing the
Depository Trust Company as custodian, payment will be made to
the Depository Trust Company for further credit to each bank or
broker account through which such Shares are held. For New York
registered Royal Dutch Shares (other than those holding through
a bank or broker account utilizing the Depository Trust Company
as custodian), payment will be made to the account indicated by
each Minority Holder in the Letter of Transmittal which will be
sent to all holders of New York registered Royal Dutch Shares.
Minority Holders of New York registered Royal Dutch Shares will
be required to surrender their share certificates to receive
payment. Instructions for surrendering share certificates will
be set forth in such Letter of Transmittal. For Royal Dutch
Shares in bearer form which are held through Euroclear
Nederland, payment will be made to Euroclear Nederland which
will distribute the funds to Minority Holders through its member
institutions on the basis of the terms and conditions for such
institutions. For Hague registered Royal Dutch Shares, payment
of the Merger Consideration will be made to the account most
recently indicated by each Minority Holder for the payment of
dividends. Minority Holders of Hague registered Royal Dutch
Shares who have not given account information, or who have given
inaccurate account information, will receive payment upon
providing evidence of ownership and information which allows
Shell Petroleum to make payment. For Royal Dutch Shares in
bearer form which are untraceable and for K-certificates,
payment will be made upon the presentation of the certificates
representing such shares: (i) for the period commencing on
the effective date of the Merger (which is expected to be
December 21, 2005) and ending December 31, 2006, to
ABN AMRO, Issuing Institutions Corporate Actions MF
2020, Kemelstede 2, 4817 ST Breda, The Netherlands; and
(ii) for the period commencing on January 1, 2007
until the twentieth anniversary of the effective date of the
Merger, to the registered address of Shell Petroleum in
The Netherlands (currently, Carel van Bylandtlaan 30,
2596 HR The Hague, The Netherlands). After the twentieth
anniversary of the effective date of the Merger, all rights to
receive the Merger Consideration (and Interest, if any) will be
forfeited. In the case of eligible UK resident Minority
Holders electing to receive exchangeable loan notes, such loan
notes will be issued in the manner described in the information
made available to such holders.
The Boards of Royal Dutch and Shell Petroleum have drawn up and
approved the Merger Proposal. Among other things, the Merger
Proposal states the parties to the Merger, the Exchange Ratio
and payments to be made for fractional entitlements, the date
from which and extent to which shareholders of Royal Dutch will
share in the profits of Shell Petroleum, the date from which the
financial information of Royal Dutch will be accounted for by
Shell Petroleum, the contents of the articles of association
before and after the Merger and the composition of the Board
after the proposed Merger.
The Merger Proposal, the statement of annual reports and
accounts of Royal Dutch and Shell Petroleum for the three years
ending December 31, 2004, statement of assets and
liabilities for Royal Dutch and Shell Petroleum as of
September 30, 2005, the statements of Deloitte and E&Y
received pursuant to section 2:328 paragraph 1 of the Dutch
Civil Code and the press release dated October 31, 2005
were deposited with the trade
38
register in The Hague on October 31, 2005, for inspection.
Copies of the documents deposited with the trade register, the
explanation of the Merger Proposal, the reports of Deloitte and
E&Y pursuant to section 2:328 paragraph 2 of the
Dutch Civil Code, a text of the disclosure document (dated
October 31, 2005) and the Implementation Agreement may be
inspected at the registered address of Royal Dutch and Shell
Petroleum, Carel van Bylandtlaan 30, 2596 HR The Hague, The
Netherlands. An advertisement was published in the Dutch
newspaper NRC Handelsblad stating that the documents described
above were deposited. Following this, creditors of Royal Dutch
and Shell Petroleum have a one month opposition period. That
period will expire on December 2, 2005. None of Royal Dutch
Shell, Shell Petroleum or Royal Dutch have made any provision in
connection with the Proposed Transaction which grant the
Minority Holders access to the corporate files of Royal Dutch
Shell, Shell Petroleum or Royal Dutch or to obtain counsel or
appraisal services at the expense of Royal Dutch Shell, Shell
Petroleum or Royal Dutch. Under Dutch law, security holders are
not entitled to any appraisal rights or other similar rights in
connection with the Proposed Transaction.
The Proposed Transaction is expected to be completed on
December 21, 2005.
|
|
2. |
Conditions to the Proposed Transaction |
Pursuant to the Implementation Agreement, the execution of the
Proposed Transaction is (except to the extent waived by all
parties to the Implementation Agreement) subject to the
following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
an accountants statement pursuant to article 2:94b(2) of
the Dutch Civil Code relating to the value of Shell Transport in
relation to the contribution of the entire issued ordinary share
capital of Shell Transport to Royal Dutch having been received; |
|
|
|
no enforcement proceedings related to the Schedule 13E-3,
of which this Disclosure Document forms a part, together with
the exhibits thereto (the Schedule 13E-3),
having been initiated or threatened by the SEC and this
Disclosure Document having been provided to Royal Dutch
shareholders no less than 20 days prior to the EGM in
accordance with Rule 13e-3 under the Exchange Act; |
|
|
|
Royal Dutch and Shell Petroleum having obtained (i) written
confirmation from the trade register in The Hague that the
Merger Proposal and the certain other documents required to be
filed under Dutch law have been on file for public inspection
for a period of one month and (ii) evidence that no
petition (as described in article 2:316 (2) of the
Dutch Civil Code) has been filed, or that all such petitions
have been withdrawn or dismissed by the Court; |
|
|
|
the EGM having adopted resolutions to (i) approve the Unwind,
(ii) issue 1,379,680,000 shares to Royal Dutch Shell against the
contribution in kind of the entire issued ordinary share capital
of Shell Transport, (iii) amend the articles of association of
Royal Dutch in two steps and (iv) to merge Royal Dutch with
Shell Petroleum as described in the Merger Proposal; |
|
|
|
a declaration of no objection having been received from the
Dutch Ministry of Justice in respect of the proposed amendments
of the articles of association of Royal Dutch; |
|
|
|
Royal Dutch having provided to SPCo a consent for the issue of
1,262,361,568 bonus shares by SPCo to Shell Transport and
having signed the requisite written resolutions; |
|
|
|
the general meeting of shareholders of Shell Petroleum having
resolved to amend the articles of association of Shell Petroleum
and a declaration of no objection having been received from the
Dutch Ministry of Justice in respect of the proposed amendment
of the articles of association of Shell Petroleum; |
|
|
|
the board of management of Shell Petroleum having resolved upon
the merger with Royal Dutch as described in the Merger Proposal; |
|
|
|
Royal Dutch Shell certifying in writing that certain of the
above conditions have been satisfied; and |
|
|
|
a notarial deed containing the minutes of the general meeting of
shareholders of Royal Dutch having been drawn up. |
|
|
3. |
Source and Amount of Funds |
The total amount of funds that may be required to compensate the
Minority Holders for all of their Royal Dutch Shares will be
approximately
1.6 billion
or approximately $1.9 billion based on the noon buying rate
as
39
of November 10, 2005 (assuming all Minority Holders receive
cash). Shell Petroleum will fund the payments from cash on hand.
To the extent eligible UK resident Minority Holders elect to
receive exchangeable loan notes, such loan notes will be issued
by Shell Petroleum, and upon exchange thereof, holders of loan
notes will receive Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary
shares. Any consideration paid by the issuance of exchangeable
loan notes will reduce cash paid by Shell Petroleum to Minority
Holders on consummation of the Proposed Transaction.
Because Shell Petroleum has available sufficient funds to make
payments for all outstanding Royal Dutch Shares held by the
Minority Holders at the price being offered, there are no
alternative financing plans or arrangements.
The following is an estimate of fees and expenses to be incurred
in connection with the Proposed Transaction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
$ |
229,535 |
|
Legal
|
|
|
4,600,000 |
|
Accounting
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
Printing
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
Fees relating to fairness reports and opinions
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
1,600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
8,179,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
V. CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL
INCOME TAX AND DUTCH TAX CONSEQUENCES
|
|
1. |
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Proposed Transaction |
The following describes the material U.S. Federal income
tax consequences of the Proposed Transaction to holders of Royal
Dutch Shares. This description is the opinion of Cravath, and is
limited as described below. This description applies only to
holders of Royal Dutch Shares that are U.S. holders.
For purposes of this description, a U.S. holder means:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or resident of the United States; |
|
|
|
a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created
or organized under the laws of the United States or any of its
political subdivisions; |
|
|
|
a trust, if (i) a U.S. court is able to exercise
primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one
or more U.S. fiduciaries have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust or (ii) the trust has
made a valid election under applicable U.S. Treasury
regulations to be treated as a U.S. person; or |
|
|
|
an estate that is subject to U.S. Federal income tax on its
income regardless of its source. |
If a partnership holds Royal Dutch Shares, the tax treatment of
a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner
and the activities of the partnership. Each partner of a
partnership holding Royal Dutch Shares is urged to consult his,
her or its own tax advisor.
This description is based upon the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, Treasury regulations, administrative rulings
and judicial decisions currently in effect, all of which are
subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. The
description applies only to holders of Royal Dutch Shares that
hold their Royal Dutch Shares as a capital asset (generally, for
investment purposes). Further, the description does not address
all aspects of U.S. Federal income taxation that may be
relevant to a particular shareholder in light of his, her or its
personal
40
investment circumstances or to shareholders subject to special
treatment under the U.S. Federal income tax laws, including:
|
|
|
|
|
insurance companies; |
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations; |
|
|
|
dealers in securities or foreign currency; |
|
|
|
banks or trusts; |
|
|
|
persons that hold their Royal Dutch Shares as part of a
straddle, a hedge against currency risk or a constructive sale
or conversion transaction; |
|
|
|
holders that have a functional currency other than the
U.S. dollar; |
|
|
|
investors in pass-through entities; |
|
|
|
shareholders who acquired their Royal Dutch Shares through the
exercise of options, or otherwise as compensation or through a
tax-qualified retirement plan; or |
|
|
|
holders of options granted under any Royal Dutch benefit plan. |
Furthermore, this description does not address any non-income
tax or any state, local or non-U.S. tax consequences of the
Proposed Transaction. The description also does not address the
tax consequences of any other transaction. Accordingly, each
holder of Royal Dutch Shares is strongly urged to consult with a
tax advisor to determine the particular Federal, state, local or
non-U.S. income or other tax consequences of the Proposed
Transaction.
|
|
|
Taxation of the Proposed Transaction |
A U.S. holder will recognize capital gain or loss upon the
Merger in an amount equal to the difference between the amount
of Merger Consideration and such U.S. holders
adjusted tax basis in the Royal Dutch Shares. Under current law,
capital gains realized by corporate and individual taxpayers are
generally subject to U.S. Federal income taxes at the same
rate as ordinary income, except that long-term capital gains
realized by non-corporate U.S. holders are subject to
U.S. Federal income taxes at a maximum rate of 15% for
taxable years beginning before January 1, 2009 (and 20%
thereafter). Certain limitations exist on the deductibility of
capital losses by both corporate and individual taxpayers.
Capital gains and losses on the receipt of Merger Consideration
generally should constitute gains or losses from sources within
the United States.
For U.S. holders who receive foreign currency in connection
with the Merger, the amount realized will be based on the
U.S. dollar value of the foreign currency received with
respect to such Royal Dutch Shares as determined on the date
such U.S. holders actually or constructively receive such
payment.
|
|
|
United States Backup Withholding and Information
Reporting |
In general, information reporting requirements will apply to
payments of Merger Consideration in respect of U.S. holders
other than certain exempt persons (such as corporations). A 28%
backup withholding tax (31% for 2011 and thereafter) will apply
to such payments if the U.S. holder fails to provide a
correct taxpayer identification number or other certification of
exempt status or, with respect to certain payments, the
U.S. holder fails to report in full all dividend and
interest income and the Internal Revenue Service notifies the
payer of such under-reporting. Amounts withheld under the backup
withholding rules may be credited against a holders
U.S. Federal tax liability, and a refund of any excess
amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be
obtained by filing the appropriate claim form with the Internal
Revenue Service.
2. Material Dutch Tax
Consequences of the Proposed Transaction
The following describes certain material Dutch tax consequences
of the Proposed Transaction for a holder of Royal Dutch Shares.
This description is not intended to be applicable in all
respects to all categories of investors. This section does not
purport to describe all possible Dutch tax considerations or
consequences that may be
41
relevant to a holder. Holders of Royal Dutch Shares should
consult advisers with regard to the tax consequences of the
Proposed Transaction. This section does not purport to describe
the possible Dutch tax considerations or consequences that may
be relevant to a holder of Royal Dutch Shares who receives or
has received any benefits from the Royal Dutch Shares as
employment income, deemed employment income or otherwise as
compensation.
This section does not purport to describe the possible Dutch tax
considerations or consequences that may be relevant to a holder
of Royal Dutch Shares who has a substantial interest
(aanmerkelijk belang) or a fictitious substantial
interest, as defined in the Dutch Income Tax Act 2001 (Wet
inkomstenbelasting 2001), in Royal Dutch.
Except as otherwise indicated, this section only addresses Dutch
tax legislation and regulations, as in effect on the date hereof
and as interpreted in published case law on the date hereof and
is subject to change after such date, including changes that
could have retroactive effect. A change in legislation or
regulations may thus invalidate all or part of this section.
Unless otherwise specifically stated herein, this section does
not express any view on Dutch international tax law or on the
rules promulgated under or by any treaty or treaty organization
and does not express any view on any Dutch legal matter other
than Dutch tax law.
|
|
|
Withholding tax on Proposed Transaction |
The consideration received by the holder of a Royal Dutch Shares
in exchange for his Royal Dutch Share pursuant to the Merger
will not be subject to Dutch dividend withholding tax.
|
|
|
Dutch taxes on income and capital gains |
|
|
|
Residents of The Netherlands |
The description of certain Dutch tax consequences in this
Section V.2 is only intended for the following holders of
Royal Dutch Shares:
|
|
|
(A) individuals who are resident or deemed to be resident
in The Netherlands for purposes of Dutch taxation; |
|
|
(B) individuals who opt to be treated as a resident in The
Netherlands for purposes of Dutch taxation ((A) and
(B) jointly Dutch Individuals); and |
|
|
(C) entities (Dutch Corporate Entities) that
are subject to the Dutch Corporate Income Tax Act 1969
(CITA) and are resident or deemed to be resident of
The Netherlands for the purposes of the CITA, excluding: |
|
|
|
|
|
pension funds (pensioenfondsen) and other entities that
are exempt from Dutch corporate income tax; |
|
|
|
entities which are entitled to the participation exemption with
respect to the A Shares and/or B Shares
based on article 13, CITA; and |
|
|
|
investment institutions (beleggingsinstellingen) as
defined in article 28, CITA. |
|
|
|
Dutch Individuals not engaged or deemed to be engaged in
an enterprise or receiving benefits from miscellaneous
activities |
Generally, a Dutch Individual who holds Royal Dutch Shares that
are not attributable to an enterprise from which he derives
profits as an entrepreneur (ondernemer) or pursuant to a
co-entitlement to the net worth of such enterprise other than as
an entrepreneur or a shareholder, or attributable to
miscellaneous activities (overige werkzaamheden), will be
subject annually to an income tax imposed on a fictitious yield
on such shares under the regime for savings and investments
(Box III). Irrespective of the actual income or
capital gains realized, the annual taxable benefit of all the
assets and liabilities of a Dutch Individual that are taxed
under this regime, including the Royal Dutch Shares, is set at a
fixed amount. This fixed amount equals 4 per cent. of the
average fair market value of these assets and liabilities,
including of the Royal Dutch Shares, measured, in general, at
the beginning and end of every calendar year. The current tax
rate under the regime for savings and investments is a flat rate
of 30 per cent.
42
Consequently, the disposal of Royal Dutch Shares upon the Merger
will not in itself result in Dutch taxation for such a Dutch
Individual.
|
|
|
Dutch Individuals engaged or deemed to be engaged in an
enterprise or receiving benefits from miscellaneous
activities |
Any benefits derived or deemed to be derived from the Royal
Dutch Shares (including any capital gains realized on the
disposal thereof upon the Merger) that are either attributable
to an enterprise from which a Dutch Individual derives profits,
whether as an entrepreneur or pursuant to a co-entitlement to
the net worth of such enterprise (other than as an entrepreneur
or a shareholder), or attributable to miscellaneous activities
(overige werkzaamheden) are generally subject to income
tax in the Dutch Individuals hands at statutory
progressive rates (currently up to 52 per cent.).
Any benefits derived or deemed to be derived from Royal Dutch
Shares (including any capital gains realized on the disposal
thereof upon the Merger) that are held by a Dutch Corporate
Entity are generally subject to corporate income tax at
statutory rates (currently 27 per cent. for profits up to
and including
22,689 and
31.5 per cent. thereafter).
|
|
|
Non-residents of The Netherlands |
A holder other than a Dutch Individual or Dutch Corporate Entity
will not be subject to Dutch taxes on income or on capital gains
in respect of the ownership and disposal of Royal Dutch Shares,
except if:
|
|
|
(a) such holder derives profits from an enterprise, whether
as entrepreneur (ondernemer) or pursuant to a
co-entitlement to the net worth of such enterprise, other than
as an entrepreneur or a shareholder which enterprise is, in
whole or in part, carried on through a permanent establishment
(vaste inrichting) or a permanent representative
(vaste vertegenwoordiger) in The Netherlands to which the
Royal Dutch Shares are attributable; or |
|
|
(b) the holder is an individual and derives benefits from
miscellaneous activities (resultaat uit overige
werkzaamheden) performed in The Netherlands in respect of
the Royal Dutch Shares, including, without limitation,
activities which are beyond the scope of active portfolio
investment activities. |
VI. MISCELLANEOUS
In connection with the Proposed Transaction contemplated hereby,
Royal Dutch Shell, Shell Petroleum and Royal Dutch have not, as
of the date hereof, employed, retained or compensated other
persons to make solicitations or recommendations to Royal Dutch
shareholders. The Boards of Royal Dutch Shell, Royal Dutch and
Shell Petroleum were assisted by a working group of senior
finance, accounting and legal personnel from the Shell Group.
While no specific use of corporate assets of Royal Dutch is
contemplated by Royal Dutch Shell, Shell Petroleum or Royal
Dutch in connection with the Proposed Transaction, it is
possible that some such use, none of which is expected to be
material, may occur.
VII. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Additional information concerning the Proposed Transaction may
be found in the Rule 13e-3 Transaction Statement and
exhibits in the Schedule 13E-3, including amendments
thereto, as and when filed with the SEC under the Exchange Act
by Royal Dutch Shell, Shell Petroleum and Royal Dutch and on
www.shell.com/royaldutchmerger. Neither the website, nor its
content, is incorporated by reference herein. Following delivery
thereof to Royal Dutch or Shell Petroleum, copies of the
opinions, certifications and reports described under
Section II.4(b), Special Factors Certain
Opinions and Reports may be obtained by mail through
written request to Royal Dutch and will also be filed as
exhibits to the Schedule 13E-3 and made available on the
website.
43
Additional information on Royal Dutch and the Shell Group can be
found in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Royal Dutch
(jointly filed with Shell Transport) with respect to the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004, as amended on May 4,
2005 (the Royal Dutch 20-F).
Royal Dutch is, as of the date of this Disclosure Document,
subject to the informational reporting requirements of the
Exchange Act, and accordingly files or furnishes reports and
other information with the SEC. Reports and other information
filed by Royal Dutch with the SEC, including in the Royal Dutch
20-F, can be inspected and copied at the public reference
facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549, U.S.A. Copies of those materials
can be obtained at prescribed rates from the SECs Public
Reference Section at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.
20549, U.S.A. Further information on the operation of the
SECs Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. can be
obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also
maintains an internet website that contains reports and other
information about issuers, such as Royal Dutch, who file
electronically with the SEC. The address of that website is
www.sec.gov.
None of Royal Dutch Shell, Shell Petroleum, Royal Dutch or any
of their respective affiliates has authorized any person to
provide any information or to make any representation in
connection with this Disclosure Document or the Proposed
Transaction referred to herein other than the information
contained or referenced in this Disclosure Document. If any
person provides any of this information or makes any
representation of this kind, that information or representation
must not be relied upon as having been authorized by Royal Dutch
Shell, Shell Petroleum, Royal Dutch or such affiliate.
44
SCHEDULE I
The following is a list of the executive officers and directors
of Royal Dutch Shell, Shell Petroleum and Royal Dutch setting
forth, for each person, the name, citizenship, business address,
present principal occupation or employment and the name,
principal business and address of any corporation or other
organization in which such employment is conducted and the
five-year employment history of such person.
|
|
|
|
|
Name, Citizenship, Positions |
|
Present Principal Occupation |
|
|
at Filing Companies |
|
or Employment* |
|
Five Year Employment History |
|
|
|
|
|
Aad Jacobs
The Netherlands
Non-Executive Chairman of Royal Dutch Shell
Non-Executive Chairman of Royal Dutch |
|
Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of
Royal Dutch Shell |
|
He was appointed a member of the Royal Dutch supervisory board
in 1998 and Chairman of the Royal Dutch supervisory board
(currently Non-Executive Chairman) in 2002 and Non-Executive
Chairman of the Royal Dutch Shell Board of Directors in 2004. He
has been Chairman of the supervisory boards of Joh.
Enschedé B.V., which engages in printing commercial
and confidential documents, since 1998, Imtech N.V., which
provides technical services in the fields of information &
communication technology and electrical & mechanical
engineering, since 2001 and VNU N.V., a global information
and media company, since 1998; Vice-Chairman of the supervisory
boards of Buhrmann N.V., which supplies office products to
businesses and institutions, since 1998 and SBM Offshore
(formerly IHC Caland N.V.), which engages as a supplier to
the offshore oil and gas industry, since 1998; and a member of
the supervisory board of ING Groep N.V., a financial
services company, since 1998. |
|
Lord Kerr of Kinlochard
Britain
Deputy Chairman and Senior Independent Non-Executive Director of
Royal Dutch Shell |
|
Deputy Chairman of the Board of Directors and Senior Independent
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell |
|
He was a Non-Executive Director of Shell Transport from 2002 to
2005 and has been Deputy Chairman and Senior Independent
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell in 2004. Previously,
he served in various jobs in the UK Diplomatic Service from 1966
to 2002, including as UK Permanent Representative to the
European Union, British Ambassador to the U.S., Foreign Office,
Permanent Under Secretary of State and Head of the UK Diplomatic
Service. On leaving government service he was appointed
Secretary-General of the European Convention from 2002 to 2003.
A member of the House of Lords since 2004 and Chairman of
the Court and Council of Imperial College, London, he has been a
trustee and Deputy Chairman of the National Gallery since 2002
and a trustee of the Rhodes Trust since 1997. He has been a
non-executive Director of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited
(both engaged in finding, mining and processing mineral
resources) since 2003 and Scottish American Investment
Company plc, an investment company, since 2002. |
45
|
|
|
|
|
Name, Citizenship, Positions |
|
Present Principal Occupation |
|
|
at Filing Companies |
|
or Employment* |
|
Five Year Employment History |
|
|
|
|
|
Jeroen van der Veer
The Netherlands
Chief Executive of Royal Dutch Shell
Principal Director of Shell Petroleum
Chief Executive of Royal Dutch |
|
Chief Executive of Royal Dutch Shell |
|
He was appointed President (currently Chief Executive) of Royal
Dutch in 2000, having been a Managing Director since 1997. He
was appointed Chairman of the Committee of Managing Directors of
the Shell Group in March 2004 and Chief Executive of Royal Dutch
Shell in 2004. He has also been a non-executive director of
Unilever (which includes Unilever N.V., Unilever plc and
Unilever Holdings Ltd and engages in the worldwide manufacture
and supply of consumer goods) since 2002. He was a member of the
supervisory board of De Nederlandsche Bank N.V. (The
Netherlands central bank) from 2000 to 2004. |
|
Peter Voser
Switzerland
Chief Financial Officer of Royal Dutch Shell
Principal Director of Shell Petroleum |
|
Chief Financial Officer of Royal Dutch Shell |
|
He was employed from 1982 to March 2002 by the Shell Group in a
variety of finance and business roles in Switzerland, the UK,
Argentina and Chile, including Group Chief Internal Auditor of
the Shell Group, Chief Financial Officer of Shell Europe Oil
Products and Chief Financial Officer of Shell International Oil
Products. He was appointed Managing Director of Shell Transport,
a Group Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer and an
Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell with effect from October
2004. From March 2002 until September 2004, he was Chief Finance
Officer and Member of the Group executive committee of the Asea
Brown Boveri group of companies, based in Switzerland and
engaged in the energy and automation business areas. He has been
a member of the supervisory board of Aegon N.V., which is
engaged in the insurance business, since 2004, UBS AG, a
financial services firm, since 2005 and was a member of the
Swiss-American Chamber of Commerce from 2003 to 2004. |
|
Malcolm Brinded
Britain
Executive Director, Exploration and Production of
Royal Dutch Shell
Principal Director of Shell Petroleum |
|
Executive Director, Exploration and Production, of
Royal Dutch Shell |
|
He joined the Shell Group in 1974 and has held various positions
around the world. He was Country Chair for the Shell Group in
the UK from 1999 to 2002 and Director of Planning, Environment
and External Affairs at Shell International Ltd. from 2001 to
2002. He was a Managing Director of Royal Dutch from 2002 to
2005. In March 2004, he was appointed a Director and Managing
Director of Shell Transport and became Vice-Chairman of the
Committee of Managing Directors and in 2004 became an Executive
Director of Royal Dutch Shell. He co-chaired the UK Industry
Leadership Team from 1998 to 2001, covering all UK upstream
industry operators, contractors and suppliers. |
46
|
|
|
|
|
Name, Citizenship, Positions |
|
Present Principal Occupation |
|
|
at Filing Companies |
|
or Employment* |
|
Five Year Employment History |
|
|
|
|
|
Linda Cook
United States
Executive Director, Gas & Power, of Royal Dutch
Shell
Principal Director of Shell Petroleum
Executive Director of Royal Dutch |
|
Executive Director, Gas & Power, of Royal Dutch
Shell |
|
She was Chief Executive Officer for Shell Gas & Power
from 2000 to 2003. She was President and Chief Executive Officer
and a member of the Board of Directors of Shell Canada Limited
from 2003 to 2004. In August 2004, she was appointed a Managing
Director (currently Executive Director) of Royal Dutch and
became a Group Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of
Shell Gas & Power. In 2004 she became an Executive
Director of Royal Dutch Shell. She has been non-executive
Director of The Boeing Company, an aerospace company, since 2003. |
|
Rob Routs
The Netherlands
Executive Director, Oil Products and Chemicals, of Royal Dutch
Shell
Principal Director of Shell Petroleum |
|
Executive Director, Oil Products and Chemicals, of Royal Dutch
Shell |
|
He joined the Shell Group in 1971 and has held various positions
in The Netherlands, Canada and the U.S.A. He was President and
Chief Executive Officer of Shell Oil Products U.S.A. and
President of Shell Oil Company and Country Chair for the Shell
Group in the U.S.A. from 2002 to 2003. He was a Managing
Director of Royal Dutch from 2003 to 2005 and became a Group
Managing Director with effect from July 2003 and an Executive
Director of Royal Dutch Shell since 2004. He was Chief Executive
Officer of Equilon Enterprise LLC, (a joint venture
between Shell and Texaco), from 2000 to 2002. He is also a
director of INSEAD (a worldwide business school). |
|
Maarten van den Bergh
The Netherlands
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell |
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors of Lloyds TSB Group plc,
which engages in consumer and commercial banking and the
insurance and investment business and has its principal business
address at 25 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7HN,
England. |
|
He was President of Royal Dutch from 1998 to 2000 having been a
Managing Director of Royal Dutch since 1992. He was a member of
the Royal Dutch supervisory board from 2000 to 2005 and became a
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell in 2004. He has been
Chairman of the Board of Directors of Lloyds TSB Group plc
since 2001 and a Non-Executive director of BT Group plc, a
telecommunications company, since 2000, British
Airways plc, an international airline, since 2002 and a
member of the supervisory board of Akzo Nobel N.V., which
manufactures paint, chemicals, salt and healthcare products,
since 2005. |
47
|
|
|
|
|
Name, Citizenship, Positions |
|
Present Principal Occupation |
|
|
at Filing Companies |
|
or Employment* |
|
Five Year Employment History |
|
|
|
|
|
Sir Peter Burt
Britain
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell |
|
Chairman of ITV plc, which engages in television
broadcasting and production, pay and digital TV and television
leasing and has its principal business address at The London
Television Centre, Upper Ground, London SE1 9LT,
England. |
|
He was a Non-Executive Director of Shell Transport from 2002 to
2005 and became a Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell in
2004. He was the Executive Deputy Chairman of HBOS plc and
subsidiaries, engaged in commercial banking, from 2001 to 2003
and was Group Chief Executive of the Bank of Scotland, engaged
in commercial banking, from 1996 to 2001. He has been Chairman
of ITV plc since 2004, a director of a number of charitable
organizations and non-executive director of Templeton Emerging
Markets Trust plc, an investment trust for emerging
markets, since 2004. He was a partner of Gleacher
Partners LLP in 2003 and has been a partner of Gleacher
Shudclock LLP (known as Gleacher Shudclock Ltd) since
2003, both engaged in investment banking. |
|
Mary R. (Nina) Henderson
United States
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell |
|
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell |
|
She was a Non-Executive Director of Shell Transport from 2001 to
2005 and became a Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell in
2004. She was a director of the Hunt Corporation, engaged in the
manufacture and distribution of office and art/ framing
supplies, from 1991 to 2002. She has been a Director of Pactiv
Corporation, a producer of specialty packaging products, since
2000, AXA Financial Inc., a provider of diversified
financial services, since 1996, Del Monte Foods Company, a
manufacturer and marketer of processed foods, since 2002 and
Visiting Nurse Service of New York, a healthcare service
provider, since 1997. |
|
Sir Peter Job
Britain
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell |
|
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell |
|
He was a Non-Executive Director of Shell Transport from 2001 to
2005 and became a Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell in
2004. He was Chief Executive of Reuters Group plc, a
provider of news services, from 1991 to 2001, a member of the
supervisory board of Bertelsmann AG, a publishing and
communications company, from 2002 to 2005, non-executive
director of GlaxoSmithKline plc, a pharmaceuticals company,
from 2000 to 2004, and a non-executive director
Multex.com Inc., a provider of global financial
information, from 2002 to 2003. He has been a non-executive
director of Schroders plc, a global asset management
company, since 1999, TIBCO Software Inc, a software
company, since 2000, Instinet Group Inc, an provider of
electronic trading solutions, since 2000 and a member of the
supervisory board of Deutsche Bank AG, a provider of
banking and financial services, since 2001. |
48
|
|
|
|
|
Name, Citizenship, Positions |
|
Present Principal Occupation |
|
|
at Filing Companies |
|
or Employment* |
|
Five Year Employment History |
|
|
|
|
|
Wim Kok
The Netherlands
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell |
|
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell |
|
He was a member of the Royal Dutch supervisory board from 2003
to 2005. He was appointed Dutch Prime Minister in 1994, serving
for two periods of government up to July 2002. Since 2003 he has
been a member of the supervisory boards of ING Groep N.V.,
a financial services company, KLM N.V., an international
airline, and TNT N.V. (formerly TPG N.V.), a global
provider of mail, express and logistics services. |
|
Jonkheer Aarnout Loudon
The Netherlands
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch |
|
Chairman of the Supervisory Board of ABN AMRO Holding N.V.,
which provides financial services including retail banking,
private banking, asset management and investment banking
services and has its principal business address at Gustav
Mahlerlaan 10, Amsterdam, 1082PP, The Netherlands, and
Akzo Nobel N.V., which manufactures paint, chemicals, salt
and healthcare products and has its principal business address
at Velperweg 76, 6824 BM Arnhem, Postbus 9300,
6800 SB Arnhem, The Netherlands. |
|
He was appointed a member of the Royal Dutch supervisory board
(currently a Non-Executive Director) in 1997 and a Non-Executive
Director of Royal Dutch Shell in 2004. He was a non-executive
director of Corus Group plc, which engages in the
manufacturing processing and distribution of metal products and
provides design, technology and consultancy services, from 1999
to 2002 and Hollandsche Betongroep N.V., an international
construction company, from 1995 to 2002. He has been Chairman of
the Supervisory Board of ABN AMRO Holding N.V. since 1996,
the Supervisory Board of Akzo Nobel N.V. since 1995, a
member of the International Advisory Board of Allianz AG,
an insurance and financial services company, since 1984 and a
member of the supervisory board of Het Concertgebouw N.V.,
a concert hall, since 1993. He was a partner of Maat Schap
S-Gravenhage, from 1995 to 2005. |
Christine Morin-Postel
France
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch |
|
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell |
|
She was appointed a member of the Royal Dutch supervisory board
(currently a Non-Executive Director) in 2004 and a Non-Executive
Director of Royal Dutch Shell in 2004. From 1998 until March
2001, she was Chief Executive and Chairman of the Management
Committee of Societe Generale de Belgique, an international and
industrial services group. She was Executive Vice-president of
Suez S.A., an international and industrial services group,
from 2000 to 2003. She was a non-executive director of Arlington
Capital Investors Europe, an investment management company, from
2002 to 2005 and Fortis S.A./N.V., an international financial
services company, from 1998 to 2003. She has been a
non-executive director of Alcan Inc., a manufacturer of
aluminum, light gauge sheet, foil and packaging products, since
2003, Pilkington plc, a manufacturer of glass and glazing
products, since 2003 and 3i Group plc, which is
engaged in private equity and venture capital, since 2002. |
49
|
|
|
|
|
Name, Citizenship, Positions |
|
Present Principal Occupation |
|
|
at Filing Companies |
|
or Employment* |
|
Five Year Employment History |
|
|
|
|
|
Lawrence Ricciardi
United States
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch |
|
Senior Advisor to Jones Day Reaves & Pogue, a law firm
that has its business address at 222 East 41st St.,
New York, NY 10017-6702, and to Lazard
Freres & Co., which provides financial services,
including mergers and acquisitions, asset management, corporate
restructuring, underwriting, securities placement and research
services and has its business address at 30 Rockefeller
Plaza, New York, NY 10020. |
|
He was appointed a member of the Royal Dutch supervisory board
(currently a Non-Executive Director) in 2001 and a Non-Executive
Director of Royal Dutch Shell in 2004. He was previously Senior
Vice President and General Counsel of IBM, which creates,
develops and manufactures advanced information technologies,
from 1995 to 2002. He has been Senior Advisor to the law firm
Jones Day and to Lazard Freres & Co. since 2003 and a
member of the Board of Directors of The Readers Digest
Association, Inc., which is engaged in publishing and
direct marketing, since 1998. |
|
|
* |
Unless otherwise indicated, the business address of each of the
above persons is Royal Dutch Shell, Carel van
Bylandtlaan 30, 2596 HR The Hague,
The Netherlands. |
50
Compensation Information
Currently, Mr. Jacobs, Mr. van der Veer,
Ms. Cook, Mr. Loudon, Ms. Morin-Postel and
Mr. Ricciardi serve on the Board of Royal Dutch. Prior to
the creation of a single-tier governance structure on
July 4, 2005, Mr. Jacobs, Mr. van den Bergh,
Mr. Kok, Mr. Loudon, Ms. Morin-Postel and
Mr. Ricciardi served on the Royal Dutch supervisory board
and Mr. van der Veer, Mr. Brinded, Ms. Cook and
Mr. Routs served on the Royal Dutch board of management.
Their compensation related to these roles for the years 2004,
2003 and 2002 is described in the Royal Dutch Remuneration
Report contained in the Royal Dutch 20-F beginning on
page R-13, which is incorporated herein by reference.
For the nine months ending September 30, 2005,
Mr. van der Veer received approximately
2.5 million
in connection with his roles in the Shell Group, including as
Chief Executive of both Royal Dutch (for which he received a
directors fee of
50,000 for the
period from January 1 to July 1, 2005) and Royal Dutch
Shell and as a Principal Director of Shell Petroleum.
For the nine months ending September 30, 2005,
Ms. Cook received approximately
1.2 million
in connection with her roles in the Shell Group, including as an
Executive Director of both Royal Dutch (for which she received a
directors fee of
30,000 for the
period from January 1 to July 1, 2005) and Royal Dutch
Shell and as a Principal Director of Shell Petroleum.
For the period from January 1 to July 1, 2005, the current
Non-Executive Directors of Royal Dutch received the following
approximate amounts in connection with their roles as members of
the Royal Dutch Supervisory Board:
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Jacobs
|
|
|
38,500 |
|
Mr. Loudon
|
|
|
34,500 |
|
Ms. Morin-Postel
|
|
|
31,000 |
|
Mr. Ricciardi*
|
|
|
42,875 |
|
After July 1, 2005, all Non-Executive Directors of Royal
Dutch receive £1,000 annually for their services as
Non-Executive Directors of Royal Dutch.
In connection with their services as Non-Executive Directors of
Royal Dutch Shell, the current Non- Executive Directors of Royal
Dutch will receive the following approximate amounts in
connection with their roles on the Board of Royal Dutch Shell in
2005 (from July 1, 2005):
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Jacobs
|
|
|
£75,000 |
|
Mr. Loudon
|
|
|
£49,000 |
|
Ms. Morin-Postel
|
|
|
£42,500 |
|
Mr. Ricciardi*
|
|
|
£56,500 |
|
|
|
* |
Mr. Ricciardis compensation includes amounts received
for intercontinental travel to attend meetings, which was
2,375 per
meeting for the Royal Dutch Supervisory Board and £3,000
per meeting for Royal Dutch Shell (the fee for Royal Dutch Shell
is not paid for one meeting per year held in a location other
than The Hague or London). |
51
ANNEX A
|
|
|
The Board
N.V. Koninklijke Nederlandsche Petroleum
Maatschappij (Royal Dutch Petroleum Company)
Carel van Bylandtlaan 30
2596 HR The Hague
The Netherlands
|
|
Corporate Finance
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.
Gustav Mahlerlaan 10
1082 PP Amsterdam
Mailing address
P.O. Box 283
1000 EA Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Telephone +31 20 628 93 93
Telex 11006 ABAM NL
|
|
|
Letter of opinion |
31 October 2005 |
Dear Sirs,
We understand that it is proposed that Royal Dutch Shell plc, a
public company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales
(Royal Dutch Shell) and N.V. Koninklijke
Nederlandsche Petroleum Maatschappij (Royal Dutch Petroleum
Company), a company incorporated under the laws of
The Netherlands (the Company or Royal
Dutch) implement an internal restructuring (the
Proposed Transaction) and that as part of the
restructuring Royal Dutch would be merged (the
Merger) into its subsidiary, Shell Petroleum N.V., a
company incorporated under the laws of The Netherlands
(SPNV). Pursuant to the terms of the Merger, as set
out in the implementation agreement dated 31 October 2005
(the Implementation Agreement), we understand that
the holders of ordinary shares, nominal value Euro 0.56 per
share, in the capital of the Company (each a Royal Dutch
Share and each beneficial owner of a Royal Dutch Share a
Royal Dutch Shareholder) will be allotted one
class A share, nominal value Euro 200,000,000, of SPNV for
every 31,978,937 Royal Dutch Shares held, and, after the
allotment of 105 class A shares, will be allotted one
class B share, nominal value Euro 178,376,978, of SPNV for
28,521,530 Royal Dutch Shares held (the Exchange
Ratio). As a consequence of the Exchange Ratio, the Royal
Dutch Shareholders other than Royal Dutch Shell (the
Minority Shareholders, and each, a Minority
Shareholder) would only be entitled to a fractional
entitlement and, as a function of Dutch law, they will be
entitled, in lieu of such fractional entitlements, to receive
Euro 52.21 (or the US dollar equivalent based on the noon buying
rate for Euro in New York as announced by the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York on the business day prior to the effective date
of the Merger) per Royal Dutch Share in cash (the Merger
Consideration).
On 20 July 2005, Royal Dutch Shell, Royal Dutch and The
Shell Transport and Trading Company, p.l.c.
(currently known as The Shell Transport and Trading Company
Limited) (Shell Transport) jointly announced that
all conditions to the public exchange offer by Royal Dutch Shell
for Royal Dutch (the RD Offer) and the scheme
of arrangement of Shell Transport (together, the
Unification Transaction) had been satisfied or
waived and the Unification Transaction had completed. Under the
RD Offer, Royal Dutch Shareholders were offered 2 class A
shares, nominal value Euro 0.07 per share, in the capital of
Royal Dutch Shell (the Royal Dutch Shell Class A
Shares and together with the class B shares, nominal
value Euro 0.07 per share, in the capital of Royal Dutch Shell
the Royal Dutch Shell Shares) in exchange for each
Royal Dutch Share.
The Board of the Company has asked for ABN AMRO Bank N.V.s
(ABN AMRO) opinion as to whether the Exchange Ratio
and the Merger Consideration pursuant thereto are fair, from a
financial point of view, to the Minority Shareholders who will
receive the Merger Consideration in the Merger.
ABN AMRO Bank N.V., Established in Amsterdam
Register of Commerce Amsterdam no. 33002587
VAT no. NL 00 30 27 144 B01
A-1
For the purposes of providing its opinion, ABN AMRO has:
|
|
|
1. Reviewed certain publicly
available business and financial information relating to the
Company, including the audited annual accounts for the
consecutive financial years ending 31 December 1999 through
31 December 2004 and the unaudited nine-month financial
figures for the period ending 30 September 2005; |
|
|
2. Reviewed certain publicly
available business and financial information relating to Shell
Transport, including the audited annual accounts for the
consecutive financial years ending 31 December 1999 through
31 December 2004 and the unaudited nine-month financial
figures for the period ending 30 September 2005 as prepared
for the purposes of the Proposed Transaction; |
|
|
3. Reviewed certain publicly
available business and financial information relating to Royal
Dutch Shell, including the audited annual accounts for the
consecutive financial years ending 31 December 2002 through
31 December 2004 and the unaudited nine-month financial
figures for the period ending 30 September 2005; |
|
|
4. Reviewed certain documents
relating to the Proposed Transaction and the Unification
Transaction, including among other things the pricing
methodology approved by the Boards of Royal Dutch, Royal Dutch
Shell and SPNV; |
|
|
5. Participated in discussions with
and reviewed information provided by management and employees of
Royal Dutch Shell and Royal Dutch and their advisers with
respect to matters ABN AMRO believed necessary or appropriate to
its enquiry; |
|
|
6. Reviewed the historical stock
prices and trading volumes of the Royal Dutch Shell Shares,
Royal Dutch Shares and Shell Transport shares; |
|
|
7. Reviewed publicly available data
regarding share buybacks of Royal Dutch Shell, Royal Dutch and
Shell Transport; |
|
|
8. Reviewed the financial terms of
certain transactions ABN AMRO believes to be comparable to the
Proposed Transaction; |
|
|
9. Reviewed the legal review on the
typical price determination in a squeeze-out procedure under
Dutch law by the Court of Appeal in The Netherlands provided to
Royal Dutch Shell by De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek, Dutch legal
counsel to Royal Dutch, Royal Dutch Shell and SPNV, which was
reviewed and concurred with by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer,
Dutch legal counsel to ABN AMRO; |
|
|
10. Reviewed publicly available
data regarding the market practice of settlement of fractional
entitlements; and |
|
|
11. Performed such other financial
reviews and analyses, as ABN AMRO, in its absolute discretion,
deemed appropriate. |
ABN AMRO has assumed and relied upon, without independent
verification (other than the legal review mentioned above), the
truth, accuracy and completeness of the information, data,
analysis and financial terms provided to it or used by it
(including among other things the information, analysis and
advice received by Royal Dutch Shell, Royal Dutch and SPNV from
their respective advisors), has assumed that the same were not
misleading and does not assume or accept any liability or
responsibility for any independent verification of such
information or any independent valuation or appraisal of any of
the assets, operations or liabilities (other than the analysis
of loan notes exchangeable into Royal Dutch Shell Class A
Shares being offered in the Merger to eligible UK resident
Minority Shareholders as an alternative to receiving the Merger
Consideration (the Loan Note Consideration) for
the purpose of preparing a separate opinion of ABN AMRO
delivered to the Board of the Company on the date hereof) of the
Company, SPNV, Shell Transport or Royal Dutch Shell nor has ABN
AMRO been provided with such valuation or appraisal. No
financial forecasts were provided to ABN AMRO for purposes of
its analyses. In preparing this opinion, ABN AMRO has received
specific confirmation from senior
A-2
management of the Company that the assumptions specified in this
letter are reasonable and no information has been withheld from
ABN AMRO that could have influenced the purport of this opinion
or the assumptions on which it is based.
Further, ABN AMROs opinion is necessarily based on
financial, economic, monetary, market and other conditions,
including those in the securities and oil and gas markets, as in
effect on, and the information made available to ABN AMRO or
used by it up to, the date hereof. This opinion exclusively
focuses on the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the
Exchange Ratio and the Merger Consideration pursuant thereto to
the Minority Shareholders who will receive the Merger
Consideration and does not address any other issues such as the
underlying business decision to merge Royal Dutch and SPNV or to
recommend the Merger or to effect the Merger as opposed to any
other transaction or procedure that would allow Royal Dutch
Shell to acquire Royal Dutch Shares that it does not already
own, or the commercial merits of any of the foregoing, the
fairness of the Loan Note Consideration to eligible UK
resident Minority Shareholders who elect to receive the Loan
Note Consideration in lieu of the Merger Consideration or
the prices or volumes at which the Royal Dutch Shell Shares or
any other securities may trade following completion of the
Proposed Transaction. Subsequent developments in the above
mentioned conditions may affect this opinion and the assumptions
made in preparing this opinion and ABN AMRO is not obliged to
update, revise or reaffirm this opinion if such conditions
change.
In rendering this opinion, ABN AMRO has not provided legal,
regulatory, tax, accounting or actuarial advice and accordingly
ABN AMRO does not assume any responsibility or liability in
respect thereof. ABN AMRO did not participate in negotiations
with respect to the terms of the Implementation Agreement.
Furthermore, ABN AMRO has assumed that the Proposed Transaction
will be consummated on the terms and conditions as set out in
the Implementation Agreement, without any material changes to,
or waiver of, any of such terms or conditions, that a dividend
in an amount equal to Euro 0.46 will be payable by the Company
to the Royal Dutch Shareholders of record prior to the effective
date of the Merger, and that the effective date of the Merger
will be no later than 31 December 2005.
The engagement of ABN AMRO, this letter and the opinion
expressed herein are provided for the use of the Companys
Board in connection with its evaluation of the Proposed
Transaction. This opinion does not in any way constitute a
recommendation by ABN AMRO to any Royal Dutch Shareholders as to
whether such holders should vote for or against the Merger, or
whether any Minority Shareholder should receive the Merger
Consideration or elect to receive the Loan
Note Consideration, or how any Minority Shareholder should
otherwise act in relation to the Proposed Transaction. This
opinion does not constitute a statement or report pursuant to
article 328 Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code.
ABN AMRO is acting as financial advisor to the Company in
connection with the Proposed Transaction, and will receive fees
for its services, including for rendering the opinion, which
fees are contingent upon rendering the opinion. From time to
time ABN AMRO and its affiliates may have also
(i) maintained banking relationships with members of the
Royal Dutch Shell group of companies, including overdraft
facilities and intraday facilities related to cash management
and project financing, (ii) provided investment banking
services such as mergers and acquisitions advice and
(iii) executed transactions, for their own account or for
the accounts of customers, in the Royal Dutch Shares, the shares
of Shell Transport, the Royal Dutch Shell Shares or debt
securities in any of the foregoing and, accordingly, may at any
time hold a long or short position in such securities. ABN AMRO
is a holder of Royal Dutch Shell Shares, and provides financing
facilities to the Company and Royal Dutch Shell. ABN AMRO is
acting as the exchange agent in connection with the Merger.
It is understood that this letter may not be relied upon by, nor
be disclosed to, in whole or in part, any third party for any
purpose whatsoever, without the prior written consent of ABN
AMRO. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this letter (i) may be
disclosed if required by or requested under applicable law or
regulation and (ii) may be reproduced in full in the
disclosure document relating to the Merger to be distributed to
shareholders and in any filing to be made with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, so long as this
letter is reproduced in full in such disclosure document and
filing and any description of or reference in such disclosure
A-3
document or filing to ABN AMRO, the opinion or the related
analysis is in a form reasonably acceptable to ABN AMRO and its
counsel.
This opinion is issued in the English language and reliance may
only be placed on this opinion as issued in the English
language. If any translations of this opinion are delivered they
are provided only for ease of reference, have no legal effect
and ABN AMRO makes no representation as to (and accepts no
liability in respect of) the accuracy of any such translation.
This letter and ABN AMROs obligations to the Board of
Royal Dutch hereunder shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with Dutch law and any claims or disputes arising out
of, or in connection with, this letter shall be subject to the
exclusive jurisdiction of the Dutch courts.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, ABN AMRO is of the
opinion that, as at the date hereof, the Exchange Ratio and the
Merger Consideration pursuant thereto are fair, from a financial
point of view, to the Minority Shareholders who will receive the
Merger Consideration in the Merger.
Yours sincerely,
/s/ ABN AMRO
Bank N.V.
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.
A-4
ANNEX B
|
|
|
The Board
N.V. Koninklijke Nederlandsche Petroleum
Maatschappij (Royal Dutch Petroleum Company)
Carel van Bylandtlaan 30
2596 HR The Hague
The Netherlands |
|
Corporate Finance
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.
Gustav Mahlerlaan 10
1082 PP Amsterdam
Mailing address
P.O. Box 283
1000 EA Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Telephone +31 20 628 93 93
Telex 11006 ABAM NL |
|
|
Letter of opinion |
31 October 2005 |
Dear Sirs,
We understand that it is proposed that Royal Dutch Shell plc, a
public company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales
(Royal Dutch Shell) and N.V. Koninklijke
Nederlandsche Petroleum Maatschappij (Royal Dutch Petroleum
Company), a company incorporated under the laws of The
Netherlands (the Company or Royal Dutch)
implement an internal restructuring (the Proposed
Transaction) and that as part of the restructuring, Royal
Dutch would be merged (the Merger) into its
subsidiary, Shell Petroleum N.V., a company incorporated under
the laws of The Netherlands (SPNV). Pursuant to the
terms of the Merger, as set out in the implementation agreement
dated 31 October 2005 (the Implementation
Agreement), we understand that the holders of ordinary
shares, nominal value Euro 0.56 per share, in the capital of the
Company (each a Royal Dutch Share and each
beneficial owner of a Royal Dutch Share a Royal Dutch
Shareholder) will be allotted one class A share,
nominal value Euro 200,000,000, of SPNV for every 31,978,937
Royal Dutch Shares held, and, after the allotment of 105
class A shares, will be allotted one class B share,
nominal value Euro 178,376,978, of SPNV for 28,521,530 Royal
Dutch Shares held (the Exchange Ratio). As a
consequence of the Exchange Ratio, the Royal Dutch Shareholders
other than Royal Dutch Shell (the Minority
Shareholders, and each, a Minority
Shareholder) would only be entitled to a fractional
entitlement and, as a function of Dutch law, they will be
entitled, in lieu of such fractional entitlements, to receive
Euro 52.21 (or the US dollar equivalent based on the noon buying
rate for Euro in New York as announced by the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York on the business day prior to the effective date
of the Merger) per Royal Dutch Share in cash (the Merger
Consideration). As an alternative to receiving the Merger
Consideration, eligible UK resident Minority Shareholders will
be offered the option to elect to receive a sterling-denominated
exchangeable loan note (the Loan Note) with a
sterling face amount (determined based on the Reuters 3000 Xtra
euro sterling spot rate (calculated as the average of the bid
and the ask quotations) determined at or about 11.00pm (London
time) on the day prior to the effective date of the Merger)
equal to the Merger Consideration (the Loan
Note Consideration).
The Board of the Company has asked for the opinion of ABN AMRO
Bank N.V. (ABN AMRO) as to whether or not the value
of the Loan Note Consideration, when issued, will be
greater than the value of the Merger Consideration.
For the purposes of providing its opinion, ABN AMRO has:
|
|
|
1. Reviewed the form of the Loan
Note deed (the Loan Note Deed) included as an
exhibit to the joint proposal which sets forth the terms of the
Merger and which has been approved by each of the Boards of
Royal Dutch and SPNV; |
ABN AMRO Bank N.V., Established in Amsterdam
Register of Commerce Amsterdam no. 33002587
VAT no. NL 00 30 27 144 B01
B-1
|
|
|
2. Reviewed the Loan Note document
and election forms which are being separately made available to
eligible UK resident Minority Shareholders; |
|
|
3. Reviewed certain other documents
relating to both the unification transaction consummated on
20 July 2005 (as a result of which Royal Dutch Shell became
the parent company of Royal Dutch) and the Proposed Transaction; |
|
|
4. Participated in discussions with
and reviewed information provided by Royal Dutch Shell, Royal
Dutch and its advisers with respect to matters ABN AMRO believed
necessary or appropriate to its enquiry; and |
|
|
5. Performed such other financial
reviews and analysis as ABN AMRO, in its absolute discretion,
deemed appropriate. |
ABN AMRO has assumed that the Loan Notes will carry benefits and
risks and be subject to the terms and conditions substantially
as set out in the Loan Note Deed. ABN AMRO has also
assumed, as per Royal Dutch Shells stated intention in the
Loan Note document, that Royal Dutch Shell will exchange all of
the Loan Notes for Royal Dutch Shell class A shares on the
earliest possible exchange date, being 6 January 2006 (although
ABN AMRO considered the effect of an exchange or redemption at a
later date). ABN AMRO has assumed and relied upon, without
independent verification, the truth, accuracy and completeness
of the information, data, analysis and financial terms provided
to it or used by it, has assumed that the same were not
misleading and does not assume or accept any liability or
responsibility for any independent verification of such
information or any independent valuation or appraisal of the
Loan Note Consideration nor was ABN AMRO provided with such
valuation or appraisal. ABN AMRO has not performed any
independent valuation or appraisal of any of the assets,
operations or liabilities (other than the analysis of the Loan
Note Consideration for the purposes of this letter) of the
Company, SPNV, The Shell Transport and Trading Company Limited
(previously known as The Shell Transport and Trading
Company, p.l.c. and referred to herein as Shell
Transport) or Royal Dutch Shell, nor has ABN AMRO been
provided with such valuation or appraisal. In preparing this
opinion, ABN AMRO received specific confirmation from senior
management of the Company that the assumptions specified in this
letter are reasonable and no information has been withheld from
ABN AMRO that could have influenced the purport of this opinion
or the assumptions on which it is based.
Further, ABN AMROs opinion is necessarily based on
financial, economic, monetary, market and other conditions,
including those in the securities and oil and gas markets, as in
effect on, and the information made available to it or used by
it up to, the date hereof. This opinion exclusively focuses on
whether or not the value of the Loan Note Consideration,
when issued, will be greater than the value of the Merger
Consideration, and does not address any other issues such as the
fairness, from a financial point of view, of the Loan
Note Consideration to the eligible UK resident Minority
Shareholders who elect to receive the Loan
Note Consideration in lieu of the Merger Consideration, or
the underlying business decision to merge Royal Dutch and SPNV
or to recommend the Merger or to effect the Merger as opposed to
any other transaction or procedure that would allow Royal Dutch
Shell to acquire Royal Dutch Shares that it does not already
own, or the commercial merits of any of the foregoing or the
prices or volumes at which the shares of Royal Dutch Shell or
any other securities may trade following completion of the
Proposed Transaction. Subsequent developments in the above
mentioned conditions may affect this opinion and the assumptions
made in preparing this opinion and ABN AMRO is not obligated to
update, revise or reaffirm this opinion if such conditions
change.
In rendering this opinion, ABN AMRO has not provided legal,
regulatory, tax, accounting or actuarial advice and accordingly
ABN AMRO does not assume any responsibility or liability in
respect thereof. ABN AMRO did not participate in negotiations
with respect to the terms of the Implementation Agreement or the
terms or conditions of the Loan Notes. ABN AMRO has assumed that
the Proposed Transaction will be consummated on the terms and
conditions as set out in the Implementation Agreement and that
the Loan Notes issued will be subject to the terms and
conditions as set out in the Loan Note Deed, without any
material changes to, or waiver of, any of those respective terms
or conditions, that a dividend in an amount equal to Euro 0.46
will be payable by
B-2
the Company to the Royal Dutch Shareholders of record prior to
the effective date of the Merger, and that the effective date of
the Merger will be no later than 31 December 2005. ABN AMRO has
specifically not considered the individual tax situation of any
of the Minority Shareholders, which may or may not make the
election by any of these shareholders to receive Loan Notes more
or less favourable to them.
The engagement of ABN AMRO, this letter and the opinion
expressed herein are provided for the use of the Companys
Board in connection with its evaluation of the Proposed
Transaction. This opinion does not in any way constitute a
recommendation by ABN AMRO to any Royal Dutch Shareholders as to
whether such holders should vote for or against the Merger,
whether any Minority Shareholder should receive the Merger
Consideration or elect to receive the Loan
Note Consideration, or how any Minority Shareholder should
otherwise act in relation to the Proposed Transaction. This
opinion does not constitute a statement or report pursuant to
article 328 Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code.
ABN AMRO is acting as financial advisor to the Company in
connection with the Proposed Transaction, and will receive fees
for its services, including for rendering the opinion, which
fees are contingent upon rendering the opinion. From time to
time ABN AMRO and its affiliates may have also
(i) maintained banking relationships with the members of
the Royal Dutch Shell group of companies, including overdraft
facilities and intraday facilities related to cash management
and project financing, (ii) provided investment banking
services such as mergers and acquisitions advice and
(iii) executed transactions, for their own account or for
the accounts of customers, in the Royal Dutch Shares, the shares
of Shell Transport, the shares of Royal Dutch Shell or debt
securities in any of the foregoing and, accordingly, may at any
time hold a long or short position in such securities. ABN AMRO
is a holder of Royal Dutch Shell shares, and provides financing
facilities to the Company and Royal Dutch Shell. ABN AMRO is
acting as the exchange agent in connection with the Merger.
It is understood that this letter may not be relied upon by, nor
be disclosed to, in whole or in part, any third party for any
purpose whatsoever, without the prior written consent of ABN
AMRO. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this letter (i) may be
disclosed if required by or requested under applicable law or
regulation and (ii) may be reproduced in full in the
disclosure document relating to the Merger to be distributed to
shareholders and in any filing to be made with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, so long as this letter is
reproduced in full in such disclosure document and filing and
any description of or reference in such disclosure document or
filing to ABN AMRO, the opinion or the related analysis is in a
form reasonably acceptable to ABN AMRO and its counsel.
This opinion is issued in the English language and reliance may
only be placed on this opinion as issued in the English
language. If any translations of this opinion are delivered they
are provided only for ease of reference, have no legal effect
and ABN AMRO makes no representation as to (and accepts no
liability in respect of) the accuracy of any such translation.
This letter and ABN AMROs obligations to the Board
hereunder shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
Dutch law and any claims or disputes arising out of, or in
connection with, this letter shall be subject to the exclusive
jurisdiction of the Dutch Courts.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, ABN AMRO is of the
opinion that the value of the Loan Note Consideration, when
issued, will not be greater than the value of the Merger
Consideration.
Yours sincerely,
/s/ ABN AMRO
Bank N.V.
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.
B-3
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
Audited Combined Financial Statements of Royal Dutch
Petroleum Company and The Shell Transport and Trading Company
Limited for the Year Ended December 31, 2004
(US GAAP) |
Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
|
|
F-3 |
Combined Statement of Income
|
|
F-4 |
Combined Balance Sheet
|
|
F-5 |
Combined Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity
|
|
F-6 |
Combined Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
F-7 |
Notes to the Combined Financial Statements
|
|
F-8 |
Supplementary Information Oil and Gas (Unaudited)
|
|
F-52 |
Reserves
|
|
F-52 |
Standardised measure of discounted future cash flows
|
|
F-55 |
Supplementary Information Derivatives and other
Financial Instruments and Derivative Commodity Instruments
|
|
F-57 |
|
Schedule 1
|
|
F-78 |
|
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Statements of
Royal Dutch Petroleum Company and The Shell Transport and
Trading Company Limited for the Three and Nine Month Periods
Ended September 30, 2005 (IFRS) |
Condensed Combined Interim Statement of Income
|
|
F-80 |
Condensed Combined Interim Balance Sheet
|
|
F-81 |
Condensed Combined Interim Statement of Changes in Equity
|
|
F-82 |
Condensed Combined Interim Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
F-83 |
Notes to the Condensed Combined Interim Financial Statements
|
|
F-84 |
F-1
Royal Dutch Petroleum Company and The Shell Transport and
Trading Company Limited
Combined Financial Statements
For the year ended
December 31, 2004
(Comprising the combined financial statements of Royal Dutch
Petroleum Company and of The Shell Transport and Trading
Company Limited which supersede the previously issued financial
statements of Royal Dutch Petroleum Company as a result of the
unification of those companies under Royal Dutch Shell plc.)
F-2
REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRMS
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Royal Dutch
Petroleum Company and The Shell Transport and Trading
Company Limited
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheets of
Royal Dutch Petroleum Company, The Shell Transport and Trading
Company Limited and their subsidiaries as of December 31,
2004 and 2003, and the related combined statements of income, of
changes in shareholders equity and of cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 on
pages F-4 to F-51. These combined financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companies management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the combined
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the Standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the combined financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the combined financial statements. An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management in the preparation of
the combined financial statements, as well as evaluating the
overall combined financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the combined
financial position of Royal Dutch Petroleum Company and The
Shell Transport and Trading Company Limited and their
subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the combined
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
As discussed in Note 1, these financial statements comprise
the combined financial statements of Royal Dutch Petroleum
Company and The Shell Transport and Trading Company Limited.
/s/ KPMG Accountants N.V.
KPMG Accountants N.V.,
The Hague The Netherlands
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,
London United Kingdom
March 29, 2005, except for Note 1 (Basis of
Presentation) which is as of October 28, 2005.
F-3
COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(US GAAP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
$ million | |
Sales proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337,522 |
|
|
|
263,889 |
|
|
|
218,287 |
|
Sales taxes, excise duties and similar levies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,332 |
|
|
|
65,527 |
|
|
|
54,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
proceeds(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265,190 |
|
|
|
198,362 |
|
|
|
163,453 |
|
Cost of
sales(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,678 |
|
|
|
165,147 |
|
|
|
135,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,512 |
|
|
|
33,215 |
|
|
|
27,795 |
|
Selling and distribution expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,340 |
|
|
|
11,409 |
|
|
|
9,617 |
|
Administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,542 |
|
|
|
1,887 |
|
|
|
1,598 |
|
Exploration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,823 |
|
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
1,052 |
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit of Shell Group companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,254 |
|
|
|
17,860 |
|
|
|
15,056 |
|
Share of operating profit of associated companies
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5,653 |
|
|
|
3,446 |
|
|
|
2,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,907 |
|
|
|
21,306 |
|
|
|
17,848 |
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,730 |
|
|
|
1,996 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
1,324 |
|
|
|
1,291 |
|
Currency exchange gains/(losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,385 |
|
|
|
21,747 |
|
|
|
17,314 |
|
Taxation
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
15,137 |
|
|
|
9,352 |
|
|
|
7,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income after taxation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,248 |
|
|
|
12,395 |
|
|
|
9,659 |
|
Income applicable to minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,622 |
|
|
|
12,042 |
|
|
|
9,484 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of tax
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,182 |
|
|
|
12,322 |
|
|
|
9,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Includes net proceeds related to buy/sell contracts:
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
24,744 |
|
|
|
19,795 |
|
|
|
14,267 |
|
(b) Includes costs related to buy/sell contracts:
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
24,719 |
|
|
|
19,713 |
|
|
|
14,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ | |
Net income per Royal Dutch Petroleum Company share
|
|
|
5.39 |
|
|
|
3.63 |
|
|
|
2.82 |
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
4.93 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
|
|
|
2.77 |
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per Royal Dutch Petroleum Company share
|
|
|
5.39 |
|
|
|
3.63 |
|
|
|
2.81 |
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
4.93 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
|
|
|
2.76 |
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per Shell Transport and Trading Company Limited share
|
|
|
0.77 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per Shell Transport and Trading Company
Limited share
|
|
|
0.77 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
(US GAAP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 31, | |
|
Dec 31, | |
|
|
Note | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Fixed assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible assets
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
88,940 |
|
|
|
87,088 |
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
4,890 |
|
|
|
4,735 |
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
associated companies
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
19,743 |
|
|
|
19,371 |
|
|
|
securities
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
|
2,317 |
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,321 |
|
|
|
114,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long term assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid pension costs
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
8,278 |
|
|
|
6,516 |
|
|
Deferred taxation
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,995 |
|
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
4,369 |
|
|
|
2,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other long-term assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,642 |
|
|
|
11,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
15,391 |
|
|
|
12,690 |
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
38,063 |
|
|
|
29,013 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
9,208 |
|
|
|
2,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,662 |
|
|
|
43,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: amounts due within one year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
5,762 |
|
|
|
10,569 |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
39,862 |
|
|
|
32,383 |
|
|
Taxes payable
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9,885 |
|
|
|
5,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,509 |
|
|
|
48,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current assets/(liabilities)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,153 |
|
|
|
(5,059 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets less current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,116 |
|
|
|
120,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities: amounts due after more than one
year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
8,600 |
|
|
|
9,100 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
8,065 |
|
|
|
6,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,665 |
|
|
|
15,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxation
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
14,844 |
|
|
|
15,185 |
|
|
Pensions and similar obligations
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
5,044 |
|
|
|
4,927 |
|
|
Decommissioning and restoration costs
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
5,709 |
|
|
|
3,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,597 |
|
|
|
24,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group net assets before minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,854 |
|
|
|
81,666 |
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,309 |
|
|
|
3,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,545 |
|
|
|
78,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity share capital
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
Preference shares
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
5,374 |
|
|
|
5,372 |
|
|
Treasury shares(a)
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(4,187 |
) |
|
|
(3,428 |
) |
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(792 |
) |
|
|
(3,836 |
) |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
89,544 |
|
|
|
79,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,545 |
|
|
|
78,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Comprises 62 million shares of Royal Dutch Petroleum
Company (2003: 51 million) and 184 million shares of
The Shell Transport and Trading Company Limited (2003:
148 million). |
F-5
COMBINED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(see Note 17)
(US GAAP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Shareholders equity at 1 January
|
|
|
78,251 |
|
|
|
66,195 |
|
|
|
62,822 |
|
Earnings reinvested:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the year
|
|
|
18,182 |
|
|
|
12,322 |
|
|
|
9,671 |
|
|
Less dividends
|
|
|
(7,396 |
) |
|
|
(6,532 |
) |
|
|
(5,522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,786 |
|
|
|
5,790 |
|
|
|
3,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation differences
|
|
|
3,548 |
|
|
|
5,795 |
|
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
Unrealised gains/(losses) on securities
|
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
Unrealised gains/(losses) on cash flow hedges
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
Minimum pension liability adjustments
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
(1,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,044 |
|
|
|
6,893 |
|
|
|
1,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock held in treasury:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
|
|
(848 |
) |
|
|
(715 |
) |
|
|
(981 |
) |
|
Release of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Dividends received
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(759 |
) |
|
|
(631 |
) |
|
|
(844 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Share buy backs)/cancellations
|
|
|
(777 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1,365 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity at 31 December
|
|
|
90,545 |
|
|
|
78,251 |
|
|
|
66,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
COMBINED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (see Note 19)
(US GAAP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
$ million | |
Cash flow provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,182 |
|
|
|
12,322 |
|
|
|
9,671 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flow provided by
operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortisation
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
12,273 |
|
|
|
11,711 |
|
|
|
8,739 |
|
|
|
Profit on sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,033 |
) |
|
|
(2,141 |
) |
|
|
(367 |
) |
|
|
Movements in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,731 |
) |
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
(2,079 |
) |
|
|
|
accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,462 |
) |
|
|
1,834 |
|
|
|
(5,830 |
) |
|
|
|
accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,317 |
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
6,989 |
|
|
|
|
taxes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,997 |
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(744 |
) |
|
|
Associated companies: dividends more/(less) than net income
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
Deferred taxation and other provisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
|
(621 |
) |
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,391 |
) |
|
|
(1,328 |
) |
|
|
(1,326 |
) |
|
|
Income applicable to minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,600 |
|
|
|
21,983 |
|
|
|
15,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow used in investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditure (including capitalised leases)
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(12,734 |
) |
|
|
(12,252 |
) |
|
|
(12,102 |
) |
|
Acquisitions (Enterprise Oil, Penzoil-Quaker State and
additional shares in Equilon)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,925 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,078 |
|
|
|
2,286 |
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
New investments in associated companies
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1,058 |
) |
|
|
(983 |
) |
|
|
(1,289 |
) |
|
Disposals of investments in associated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,327 |
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
Proceeds from sale and other movements in investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,743 |
|
|
|
1,988 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow used in investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,644 |
) |
|
|
(8,253 |
) |
|
|
(20,632 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow used in financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (including short term part)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
new borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
5,267 |
|
|
|
repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,688 |
) |
|
|
(2,740 |
) |
|
|
(5,610 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,144 |
) |
|
|
(2,168 |
) |
|
|
(343 |
) |
|
Net increase/(decrease) in short-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,698 |
|
|
|
(2,501 |
) |
|
|
7,075 |
|
|
Change in minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
(1,363 |
) |
|
|
421 |
|
|
Repurchase of share capital, including expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(781 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,393 |
) |
|
Dividends paid to Royal Dutch and Shell Transport shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,396 |
) |
|
|
(6,532 |
) |
|
|
(5,522 |
) |
|
Dividends paid to minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow used in financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,476 |
) |
|
|
(12,864 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investments in treasury stock and dividends received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(758 |
) |
|
|
(633 |
) |
|
|
(864 |
) |
Currency translation differences relating to cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,091 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
(5,545 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at January 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,117 |
|
|
|
1,709 |
|
|
|
7,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,208 |
|
|
|
2,117 |
|
|
|
1,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
Royal Dutch Petroleum Company and The Shell Transport and
Trading Company Limited |
Royal Dutch Petroleum Company (Royal Dutch) and The
Shell Transport and Trading Company Limited (Shell
Transport, previously known as The Shell
Transport and Trading Company, p.l.c.) entered into a scheme of
amalgamation dated September 12, 1906 and agreements from
1907 by which the scheme of amalgamation was implemented and
pursuant to which they amalgamated their interests
in the oil industry. This transaction has been accounted for as
one involving a single economic entity, based on the history of
the operation and management of Royal Dutch, Shell Transport and
the Royal Dutch/ Shell Group of Companies (the Royal
Dutch/Shell Group). Since that time, Royal Dutch has owned
60% of the Royal Dutch/ Shell Group and Shell Transport has
owned 40% of the Royal Dutch/ Shell Group. All operating
activities have been conducted through the Royal Dutch/ Shell
Group and the Royal Dutch/ Shell Group has operated as a single
economic enterprise. Prior to the consummation of the
Transaction (defined below), economic interests of the Royal
Dutch and Shell Transport shareholders in the Royal Dutch/ Shell
Group reflected the 60:40 economic interests of Royal Dutch and
Shell Transport in the Royal Dutch/ Shell Group.
The Combined Financial Statements reflect the combination of the
Financial Statements of Royal Dutch, Shell Transport and the
Royal Dutch/ Shell Group. These Financial Statements provide a
more meaningful presentation of the financial results of Royal
Dutch, Shell Transport and the Royal Dutch/ Shell Group than the
individual Financial Statements previously issued by these
entities as a result of the Transaction (described below) in
which Royal Dutch Shell plc, a publicly listed company
incorporated in England and Wales and headquartered and tax
resident in The Netherlands (Royal Dutch Shell),
became the single parent company controlling Royal Dutch and
Shell Transport. The Combined Financial Statements as presented
also represent the Financial Statements of the predecessors to
Royal Dutch Shell.
Net income was allocated between Royal Dutch and Shell Transport
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Royal Dutch
|
|
|
10,910 |
|
|
|
7,395 |
|
|
|
5,807 |
|
Shell Transport
|
|
|
7,272 |
|
|
|
4,927 |
|
|
|
3,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,182 |
|
|
|
12,322 |
|
|
|
9,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity was allocated between Royal Dutch and
Shell Transport as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Royal Dutch
|
|
|
54,324 |
|
|
|
47,087 |
|
Shell Transport
|
|
|
36,221 |
|
|
|
31,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,545 |
|
|
|
78,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The basic earnings per share amounts shown relate to profit
after taxation. The basic earnings per share number has been
restated to exclude shares held by Shell Group (as defined
below) companies for stock options and other incentive
compensation plans. For the purpose of the calculation, shares
repurchased under the buy back programme are deemed to have been
cancelled on purchase date. The calculations use the following
weighted-average number of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Royal Dutch
|
|
|
2,023,212,126 |
|
|
|
2,036,687,755 |
|
|
|
2,057,657,737 |
|
Shell Transport
|
|
|
9,480,407,909 |
|
|
|
9,528,797,724 |
|
|
|
9,608,614,760 |
|
F-8
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The diluted earnings per share are based on the same profit
figures. For this calculation, the following weighted-average
number of shares are used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Royal Dutch
|
|
|
2,025,495,289 |
|
|
|
2,037,361,965 |
|
|
|
2,058,100,317 |
|
Shell Transport
|
|
|
9,485,180,086 |
|
|
|
9,531,519,807 |
|
|
|
9,613,276,052 |
|
The difference between the basic and diluted number of shares
relates to stock option schemes as mentioned above.
|
|
|
The Transaction and Royal Dutch Shell plc |
On July 20, 2005, Royal Dutch Shell became the parent
company of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport and, through Royal
Dutch and Shell Transport, of the Royal Dutch/ Shell Group
following (a) the registration by the Registrar of
Companies in England and Wales of the order of the High Court of
Justice in England and Wales sanctioning the scheme of
arrangement of Shell Transport under English law (the
Scheme) and (b) Royal Dutch Shells
confirmation that its exchange offer (the Exchange
Offer, and together with the Scheme, the
Transaction) for all of the ordinary shares of Royal
Dutch, commenced on May 19, 2005, had become unconditional
(gestanddoening). Pursuant to the Transaction, on
July 20, 2005, Royal Dutch Shell acquired all the
outstanding capital stock of Shell Transport and approximately
92% of the outstanding capital stock of Royal Dutch. On
July 20, 2005, Royal Dutch Shell commenced a subsequent
offer acceptance period during which the remaining holders of
Royal Dutch ordinary shares were permitted to tender their
shares in exchange for Royal Dutch Shell shares (or ADRs), in
accordance with the procedures described in the Exchange Offer.
The subsequent offer acceptance period expired on 9 August
2005. As a result of the Exchange Offer, including the
subsequent offer acceptance period, Royal Dutch Shell acquired
and currently holds 98.5% of the outstanding capital stock of
Royal Dutch.
Pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Offer and the Scheme,
holders of ordinary shares of Royal Dutch (Royal Dutch
Ordinary Shares), holders or Shell Transport Ordinary
shares (Shell Transport Ordinary Shares), holders of
Shell Transport bearer warrants and holders of American
depositary receipts representing Shell Transport Ordinary Shares
(the Shell Transport ADRs) received, respectively:
|
|
|
for each Royal Dutch Ordinary Share held in
New York registry form tendered: |
|
1 Royal Dutch Shell Class A American depositary receipt
(representing 2 Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary
shares) |
|
for each Royal Dutch Ordinary Share held in bearer
or Hague registry form tendered: |
|
2 Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares |
|
for each Shell Transport Ordinary Share (including
Shell Transport Ordinary Shares to which holders of Shell
Transport bearer warrants are entitled): |
|
0.287333066 Royal Dutch Shell Class B ordinary shares |
|
for each Shell Transport ADR: |
|
0.861999198 Royal Dutch Shell Class B American depositary
receipts (representing 2 Royal Dutch Shell Class B ordinary
shares) |
|
|
|
Nature of the Combined Financial Statements |
The Combined Financial Statements are presented in US dollars
and include the accounts of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport and
of those companies in which they, either directly or indirectly,
have control either through a majority of the voting rights or
the right to exercise a controlling influence or to obtain the
majority of
F-9
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the benefits and be exposed to the majority of the risks. These
companies are referred to as Shell Group companies, and
collectively as the Shell Group.
Shell Group companies are engaged in all principal aspects of
the oil and natural gas industry. They also have interests in
chemicals and additional interests in power generation and
renewable energy (mainly in wind and solar energy). The Shell
Group conducts its business through five principal segments,
Exploration & Production, Gas & Power, Oil Products,
Chemicals and Other businesses. These activities are conducted
in more than 140 countries and territories and subject to
changing economic, regulatory and political conditions.
US accounting pronouncement FIN 46 (Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities) was implemented in 2003 with a consequential
increase in the Shell Groups tangible fixed assets and
debt of $3.4 billion as of September 30, 2003, mainly
relating to power generation contracts (tolling
agreements) which were previously accounted for as
executory contracts and marked to market.
Investments in companies over which Shell Group companies have
significant influence but not control are classified as
associated companies and are accounted for on the equity basis.
Investments in companies over which the Shell Group has no
significant influence are stated at cost and dividends received
from these companies are accounted for when received. Certain
joint ventures in oil and natural gas production activities are
taken up in the Combined Financial Statements in proportion to
the relevant Shell Group interest.
The Combined Financial Statements are presented in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States (US GAAP).
The preparation of Combined Financial Statements in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and judgments that affect the
amounts reported in the Combined Financial Statements and Notes
thereto. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The Combined Financial Statements have been prepared under the
historical cost convention.
The Combined Financial Statements do not constitute the
statutory accounts of Shell Transport within the meaning of the
United Kingdom Companies Act 1985 (the Companies
Act) for any accounting period. The statutory accounts of
Shell Transport for the three years ended December 31,
2002, 2003 and 2004 have been delivered to the United Kingdom
Registrar of Companies. The statutory accounts for the three
years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 were subject
to audit and the auditors issued an audit report under section
235 of the Companies Act in respect of the accounts for the
three years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 which
was unqualified and did not include any statements made under
section 237(2) or (3) of the Companies Act.
Assets and liabilities of non-US dollar Shell Group companies
are translated to US dollars at year-end rates of exchange,
whilst their statements of income and cash flows are translated
at quarterly average rates. Translation differences arising on
aggregation are taken directly to a currency translation
differences account. Upon divestment or liquidation of a non-US
dollar Shell Group company, cumulative currency translation
differences related to that company are taken to income.
The US dollar equivalents of exchange gains and losses arising
as a result of foreign currency transactions (including those in
respect of inter-company balances unless related to transactions
of a long-term investment nature) are included in Shell Group
net income.
Sales of oil, natural gas, chemicals and all other products are
recorded when title passes to the customer. Revenue from the
production of oil and natural gas properties in which the Shell
Group has an interest with other producers are recognised on the
basis of the Shell Groups working interest (entitlement
method). The difference between actual production and net
working interest volumes is not significant. Gains and losses on
derivatives
F-10
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
contracts and contracts involved in energy trading and risk
management are shown net in the Statement of Income if these
contracts are held for trading purposes. Purchase and sale of
hydrocarbons under exchange contracts that are necessary to
obtain or reposition feedstock utilised in the Shell
Groups refinery operations are shown net in the Statement
of Income. Sales between Shell Group companies, as disclosed in
the segment information, are based on prices generally
equivalent to commercially available prices.
In Exploration & Production and Gas & Power title
typically passes (and revenues are recognised) when product is
physically transferred into a vessel, pipe or other delivery
mechanism. For sales by refining companies, title typically
passes (and revenues are recognised) either when product is
placed onboard a vessel or offloaded from the vessel, depending
on the contractually agreed terms. Revenues on wholesale sales
of oil products and chemicals are recognised when transfer of
ownership occurs and title is passed, either at the point of
delivery or the point of receipt, depending on contractual
conditions.
In November 2004, FASBs Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
discussed EITF Issue No. 04-13 Accounting for
Purchases and Sales of Inventory with the Same
Counterparty, in order to consider whether or not
buy/sell contractual arrangements should be reported
net in the Statement of Income and accounted for as nonmonetary
transactions. There was a further EITF meeting in March 2005 but
no consensus was reached on this issue and further discussion is
planned.
Buy/sell contractual arrangements in this context are defined as
those entered into concurrently or in contemplation of one
another with the same counterparty.
Buy/sell contracts are entered into by some Shell Group
companies for feedstock, principally crude oil, and finished
products mainly in the Oil Products segment, and are reported
gross in the Combined Statement of Income. Title of the
commodity passes to the buyer on delivery, purchases and sales
may not necessarily take place at the same time and amounts are
separately invoiced and settled; there is no legal right of
offset. The Shell Group considers therefore that these are not
nonmonetary transactions and are then outside the scope of APB
Opinion No. 29 Accounting for Nonmonetary
Transactions. In addition, the guidance provided in EITF
No. 99-19 Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal
versus Net as an Agent, EITF No. 02-3 Issues
Involved in Accounting for Derivative Contracts Held for Trading
Purposes and Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk
Management Activities and EITF No. 03-11
Reporting Realized Gains and Losses on Derivative
Instruments That Are Subject to FASB Statement No. 133 and
Not Held for Trading Purposes as Defined in Issue
No. 02-3 has been considered in determining the
presentation of the results of the Shell Groups
operations. As a result of a communication to the oil and gas
industry issued by the US Securities and Exchange Commission in
February 2005 requesting additional disclosures regarding
buy/sell contracts, the Shell Group reviewed such contracts and
has estimated that, if buy/sell contracts were required to be
reported net, net proceeds and cost of sales for 2004 would be
reduced by approximately $24,744 million and
$24,719 million, respectively (2003: $19,795 million
and $19,713 million, respectively; 2002:
$14,267 million and $14,419 million, respectively)
with no impact on net income.
Such arrangements should be distinguished from purchases and
sales under exchange contracts to obtain or reposition feedstock
for refinery operations and which are, as described above, shown
net in the Statement of Income. The obligations of each party
are not independent and settlement is based on volumes.
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortisation |
Tangible fixed assets related to oil and natural gas production
activities are depreciated on a unit-of-production basis over
the proved developed reserves of the field concerned, except in
the case of assets whose useful life is shorter than the
lifetime of the field, in which case the straight-line method is
applied. Rights and concessions are depleted on the
unit-of-production basis over the total proved reserves of the
relevant area. Unproved properties are amortised as required by
particular circumstances. Other tangible fixed assets are
generally depreciated on a straight-line basis over their
estimated useful lives which is generally 20 years for
refineries and chemicals plants, and 15 years for retail
service station facilities. Goodwill and other intangible
F-11
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
fixed assets with an indefinite life are not amortised but
tested for impairment annually. Other intangible fixed assets
are amortised on a straight-line basis over their estimated
useful lives (with a maximum of forty years).
Other than properties with no proved reserves (where the basis
for carrying costs on the Balance Sheet is explained under
Exploration costs), the carrying amounts of major
Exploration & Production fixed assets are reviewed for
possible impairment annually, while all assets are reviewed
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amounts for those assets may not be recoverable. If
assets are determined to be impaired, the carrying amounts of
those assets are written down to fair value, usually determined
as the amount of estimated discounted future cash flows. For
this purpose, assets are grouped based on separately
identifiable and largely independent cash flows. Assets held for
sale are written down to the amount of estimated net realisable
value.
Estimates of future cash flows used in the evaluation for
impairment for assets related to hydrocarbon production are made
using risk assessments on field and reservoir performance and
include outlooks on proved reserves and unproved volumes, which
are then discounted or risk-weighted utilising the results from
projections of geological, production, recovery and economic
factors.
Administrative expenses are those which do not relate directly
to the activities of a single business segment and include
expenses incurred in the management and co-ordination of
multi-segment enterprises.
Shell Group companies follow the successful efforts method of
accounting for oil and natural gas exploration costs.
Exploration costs are charged to income when incurred, except
that exploratory drilling costs are included in tangible fixed
assets, pending determination of proved reserves. Exploration
wells that are more than 12 months old are expensed unless
(a) (i) they are in an area requiring major capital
expenditure before production can begin and (ii) they have
found commercially producible quantities of reserves and
(iii) they are subject to further exploration or appraisal
activity in that either drilling of additional exploratory wells
is under way or firmly planned for the near future, or
(b) proved reserves are booked within 12 months
following the completion of exploratory drilling.
Management makes quarterly assessments of the amounts included
within tangible fixed assets to determine whether capitalisation
is initially appropriate and can continue. Exploration wells
capitalised beyond 12 months are subject to additional
judgment as to whether the facts and circumstances have changed
and therefore whether the conditions described in (a) and (b) no
longer apply.
An amendment (FAS 19-1 Accounting for Suspended Well
Costs) to FASB Statement No. 19 Financial
Accounting and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing
Companies has been issued. This could result, on a
prospective basis, in the continued inclusion of the cost of
certain exploratory wells in tangible fixed assets beyond
12 months which do not meet the current requirements given
in (a) and (b) above. Under the proposal amounts remain
capitalised beyond 12 months if both sufficient reserves
have been found to justify completion as a producing well, and
sufficient progress is being made towards assessing the reserves
and the economic and operating viability of the project (which
does not include delay for the possibility of a change in
circumstances beyond an entitys control, for example an
increase in oil and/or gas prices).
If this amendment had been reflected in the Shell Group
accounting policy, there would not have been a significant
effect on the Combined Financial Statements presented; certain
write-offs may not have been required which would result in
subsequent additional depreciation, depletion and amortisation
charges in future years.
F-12
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Research and development expenditure is charged to income as
incurred, with the exception of that on buildings and major
items of equipment which have alternative use.
Deferred taxation is provided using the comprehensive liability
method of accounting for income taxes based on provisions of
enacted laws. Recognition is given to deferred tax assets and
liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events
that have been recognised in the Combined Financial Statements
or in the tax returns. In estimating these tax consequences,
consideration is given to expected future events. The
measurement of deferred tax assets is reduced, if necessary, by
a valuation allowance representing the amount of any tax
benefits for which there is uncertainty of realisation. Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are presented separately in the
Balance Sheet except where there is a right of set-off within
fiscal jurisdictions.
Agreements under which Shell Group companies make payments to
owners in return for the right to use an asset for a period are
accounted for as leases. Leases that transfer substantially all
the risks and benefits of ownership are recorded at inception as
capital leases within tangible fixed assets and debt. All other
leases are recorded as operating leases and the costs are
charged to income as incurred.
Interest is capitalised, as an increase in tangible fixed
assets, on significant capital projects during construction.
Interest is also capitalised, as an increase in investments in
associated companies, on funds invested by Shell Group companies
which are used by associated companies for significant capital
projects during construction.
Securities of a trading nature are carried at fair value with
unrealised holding gains and losses being included in net
income. Securities intended to be held to maturity are carried
at cost, unless permanently impaired in which case they are
carried at fair value. All other securities are classified as
available for sale and are carried at fair value, with
unrealised holding gains and losses being taken to equity as
part of other comprehensive income.
Short-term securities with a maturity from acquisition of three
months or less and that are readily convertible into known
amounts of cash are classified as cash equivalents. Securities
forming part of a portfolio which is required to be held long
term are classified under fixed assets investments.
Shares in Royal Dutch or Shell Transport held by Shell Group
companies are reflected within Equity as treasury shares.
Cash flows resulting from movements in securities of a trading
nature are reported under cash flow provided by operating
activities while cash flows resulting from movements in other
securities are reported under cash flow used in investing
activities.
Inventories are stated at cost to the Shell Group or net
realisable value, whichever is lower. Such cost is determined by
the FIFO method and comprises direct purchase costs, cost of
production, transportation and manufacturing expenses and taxes.
F-13
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Shell Group companies use derivatives in the management of
interest rate risk, foreign currency risk and commodity price
risk. The carrying amount of all derivatives, other than those
meeting the normal purchases and sales exception, is measured
using market prices. Those derivatives qualifying and designated
as hedges are either: (1) a hedge of the fair value of a
recognised asset or liability or of an unrecognised firm
commitment (fair value hedge), or (2) a hedge
of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related
to a recognised asset or liability or a forecasted transaction
(cash flow hedge), or (3) a hedge of the
foreign currency exposure of an unrecognised firm commitment or
an available for sale security (foreign currency fair
value hedge) or the foreign currency exposure of a foreign
currency denominated forecasted transaction (foreign
currency cash flow hedge).
A change in the carrying amount of a fair value hedge is taken
to income, together with the consequential adjustment to the
carrying amount of the hedged item. The effective portion of a
change in the carrying amount of a cash flow hedge is recorded
in other comprehensive income, until income reflects the
variability of underlying cash flows; any ineffective portion is
taken to income. A change in the carrying amount of a foreign
currency hedge is recorded on the basis of whether the hedge is
a fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge. A change in the
carrying amount of other derivatives is taken to income.
Shell Group companies formally document all relationships
between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as risk
management objectives and strategies for undertaking various
hedge transactions. The effectiveness of a hedge is also
continually assessed. When effectiveness ceases, hedge
accounting is discontinued.
|
|
|
Environmental expenditures |
Liabilities for environmental remediation resulting from ongoing
or past operations or events are recognised in the period in
which an obligation, legal or constructive, to a third party
arises and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Measurement
of liabilities is based on current legal requirements and
existing technology. Recognition of any joint and several
liability is based upon Shell Group companies best
estimate of their final pro rata share of the liability.
Liabilities are determined independently of expected insurance
recoveries. Recoveries are recognised and reported as separate
events and brought into account when reasonably certain of
realisation. The carrying amount of liabilities is regularly
reviewed and adjusted for new facts or changes in law or
technology.
|
|
|
Employee retirement plans |
Retirement plans to which employees contribute and many
non-contributory plans are generally funded by payments to
independent trusts. Where, due to local conditions, a plan is
not funded, a provision which is not less than the present value
of accumulated pension benefits, based on present salary levels,
is included in the Combined Financial Statements. Valuations of
both funded and unfunded plans are carried out by independent
actuaries.
For plans which define the amount of pension benefit to be
provided, pension cost primarily represents the increase in
actuarial present value of the obligation for pension benefits
based on employee service during the year and the interest on
this obligation in respect of employee service in previous
years, net of the expected return on plan assets.
For plans where benefits depend solely on the amount contributed
to the employees account and the returns earned on
investments of those contributions, pension cost is the amount
contributed by Shell Group companies for the period.
|
|
|
Postretirement benefits other than pensions |
Some Shell Group companies provide certain postretirement
healthcare and life insurance benefits to retirees, the
entitlement to which is usually based on the employee remaining
in service up to retirement age and
F-14
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the completion of a minimum service period. The expected costs
of these benefits are accrued over the periods employees render
service to the Shell Group. These plans are not funded. A
provision is included in the Combined Financial Statements which
is sufficient to cover the present value of the accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation based on current assumptions.
Valuations of these obligations are carried out by independent
actuaries.
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation plans |
Shell Group companies account for stock-based compensation plans
in accordance with the intrinsic value method. This method
requires no recognition of compensation expense for plans where
the exercise price is not at a discount to the market value at
the date of the grant, and the number of options is fixed on the
date of grant. However, recognition of compensation expense is
required for variable award (performance-related) plans over the
vesting periods of such plans, based on the then current market
values of the underlying stock.
|
|
|
Decommissioning and restoration costs |
Estimated decommissioning and restoration costs are based on
current requirements, technology and price levels and are stated
at fair value, and the associated asset retirement costs are
capitalised as part of the carrying amount of the related
tangible fixed assets. In respect of oil and natural gas
production activities, the fair value calculation of the
liability is based on the economic life of the production assets
and discounted using the credit-adjusted risk-free rate for the
Shell Group. For tangible fixed assets not directly associated
with mineral reserves, the liability, once an obligation,
whether legal or constructive, crystallises, is recognised in
the period when a reasonable estimate of the fair value can be
made. The obligation is reflected under provisions in the
Combined Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The effects of
changes resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of
the original estimate of the liability are incorporated on a
prospective basis.
This policy reflects US accounting standard FAS 143 (Asset
Retirement Obligations) which was effective for the Shell Group
from the beginning of 2003 and resulted in a credit to income of
$255 million after tax, which was reported in 2003 as a
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle.
Acquisitions are accounted for using the purchase method. Assets
acquired and liabilities assumed are recognised at their fair
value at the date of acquisition; the amount of the purchase
consideration above this value is reflected as goodwill.
Discontinued operations comprise the activities of Shell Group
companies, which therefore do not include associated companies
or other investments, which have been disposed of during the
year, or remain held for sale at year end, and which are
significant for the Shell Group and can be clearly
distinguished, operationally and for Combined Financial
Statement purposes from other Shell Group operations. The Shell
Group does not retain, in the case of discontinued operations
which have been disposed of, and will not retain, following such
sale in the case of discontinued operations held for sale, any
residual interest in such operations.
|
|
|
Changes in US GAAP Accounting Policies since
January 1, 2005 |
For US GAAP purposes, the Shell Group changed its
presentation of incorporated joint ventures, in which the Shell
Group has a liability proportionate to its interest. Previously
the joint ventures were proportionately consolidated. As of
January 1, 2005, these ventures are presented as equity
accounted investments. This change has no impact on total equity
or income.
F-15
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
From the same date, the Shell Group changed its US GAAP
accounting policy for major inspection costs. Previously such
costs were expensed as incurred. From January 1, 2005 such
costs are capitalized and amortized to income over the period
until the next planned major inspection.
|
|
3 |
Discontinued operations |
The activities of certain Shell Group companies were disposed of
during 2004 or remain as held for sale at December 31,
2004. Those activities reported as discontinued operations in
the Statement of Income comprise certain operations in Angola,
Bangladesh, Egypt and Thailand in the Exploration &
Production segment, as part of the ongoing strategy to divest
assets where little growth potential is seen for the Shell Group
and where there is little strategic fit in relation to the cost
of managing those assets; in the US in Gas & Power which
were pipelines no longer viewed as integral to continued
optimisation of the Shell Groups existing developments and
production in the Gulf of Mexico; and in the Caribbean, Peru,
Portugal, Romania, Spain, Thailand, Venezuela and the US in Oil
Products in line with the strategy of increasing the Shell
Groups profitability through greater focus on key
countries and core assets. All of these were disposed of in 2004
except some operations in the Caribbean, Portugal, Romania and
Spain, with a carrying amount as at December 31, 2004 of
$0.3 billion, which are expected to be sold in 2005.
Income from discontinued operations comprises:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Income before taxation from discontinued operations (including
gains on disposal of $1,564 million in 2004 and impairments
of $88 million in 2003 and $9 million in 2002)
|
|
|
1,980 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
Taxation
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds of discontinued operations in 2004 (up to the date
of disposal, where applicable), excluding proceeds of the
disposal of such operations, were $3.5 billion (2003:
$3.4 billion; 2002: $3.1 billion).
Income from discontinued operations by segment is given in
Note 24(b).
Associated companies engage in similar businesses to Shell Group
companies and play an important part in the overall operating
activities of the Shell Group. Consequently, the Shell Group
share of operating profits arising from associated companies is
seen as a contribution to the total Shell Group operating profit
and is shown as such in the Combined Statement of Income. The
Shell Group share of interest income, interest expense, currency
exchange gains/ losses and taxation of associated companies has
been included within those items in the Combined Statement of
Income.
F-16
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summarised Statement of Income with respect to the Shell Group
share of net income from associated companies, together with a
segment analysis, is set out below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Net proceeds
|
|
|
53,544 |
|
|
|
44,422 |
|
|
|
33,467 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
43,694 |
|
|
|
37,084 |
|
|
|
26,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
9,850 |
|
|
|
7,338 |
|
|
|
6,723 |
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
4,197 |
|
|
|
3,892 |
|
|
|
3,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
5,653 |
|
|
|
3,446 |
|
|
|
2,792 |
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
Currency exchange gains/(losses)
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxation
|
|
|
5,266 |
|
|
|
3,131 |
|
|
|
2,428 |
|
Taxation
|
|
|
2,065 |
|
|
|
1,463 |
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
3,201 |
|
|
|
1,668 |
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
3,214 |
|
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income by segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Exploration & Production
|
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
Gas & Power
|
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
Oil Products
|
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
Chemicals
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
153 |
|
Corporate and Other
|
|
|
(319 |
) |
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,214 |
|
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Loans | |
|
Total | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
At January 1
|
|
|
16,800 |
|
|
|
2,571 |
|
|
|
19,371 |
|
|
|
17,945 |
|
New investments
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
Net asset transfers to/(from) associates, disposals and
other movements
|
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
(284 |
) |
|
|
(933 |
) |
|
|
(173 |
) |
Net income
|
|
|
3,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,214 |
|
|
|
1,681 |
|
Dividends
|
|
|
(3,472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,472 |
) |
|
|
(2,192 |
) |
Currency translation differences
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
17,029 |
|
|
|
2,714 |
|
|
|
19,743 |
|
|
|
19,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for 2004 includes a $565 million write-down in
the carrying amount of Basell (Chemicals). This impairment
followed the announcement in 2004 of a review of strategic
alternatives regarding this joint venture,
F-17
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and the carrying amount of the Shell Groups investment in
Basell at December 31, 2004 is at expected net realisable
value.
Net income for 2003 includes a $286 million write-down in
the carrying amount of Basell (Chemicals) reflecting a
reassessment of the outlook for the business, a
$200 million write-down in the carrying amount of InterGen
(Gas & Power) due to poor power market conditions,
mainly in the US merchant power segment, and a
$115 million write-down in the carrying amount of the
Cuiaba power assets in South America (Gas & Power) in
light of a reappraisal of the commercial outlook.
A summarised consolidated balance sheet with respect to the
Shell Group share of investments in associated companies is set
out below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Fixed assets
|
|
|
28,665 |
|
|
|
30,892 |
|
Current assets
|
|
|
10,427 |
|
|
|
8,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
39,092 |
|
|
|
39,140 |
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
7,559 |
|
|
|
8,745 |
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
11,790 |
|
|
|
11,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets
|
|
|
19,743 |
|
|
|
19,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An analysis by segment is shown in Note 24.
The Shell Groups major investments in associated companies
at December 31, 2004 comprised:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shell Group | |
|
Country of |
Segment Name |
|
interest | |
|
incorporation |
|
|
| |
|
|
Exploration & Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aera
|
|
|
52% |
|
|
USA |
|
Brunei Shell
|
|
|
50% |
|
|
Brunei |
|
Woodside
|
|
|
34% |
|
|
Australia |
Gas & Power
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InterGen
|
|
|
68% |
|
|
The Netherlands |
|
Nigeria LNG
|
|
|
26% |
|
|
Nigeria |
|
Oman LNG
|
|
|
30% |
|
|
Oman |
Oil Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Motiva
|
|
|
50% |
|
|
USA |
|
Showa Shell
|
|
|
40% |
|
|
Japan |
Chemicals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basell
|
|
|
50% |
|
|
The Netherlands |
|
Saudi Petrochemical
|
|
|
50% |
|
|
Saudi Arabia |
|
Infinium
|
|
|
50% |
|
|
The Netherlands |
Although the Shell Group has a 52% investment in Aera and a 68%
investment in InterGen, the governing agreements and
constitutive documents for these entities do not allow the Shell
Group to control these entities, as voting control is either
split 50:50 between the shareholders or requires unanimous
approval of the shareholders or their representatives and,
therefore, these entities have not been consolidated.
F-18
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
(c) |
Transactions between Shell Group companies and associated
companies |
Transactions between Shell Group and associated companies mainly
comprise sales and purchases of goods and services in the
ordinary course of business and in total amounted to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Charges to associated companies
|
|
|
14,018 |
|
|
|
18,155 |
|
|
|
10,573 |
|
Charges from associated companies
|
|
|
12,373 |
|
|
|
8,608 |
|
|
|
5,623 |
|
Balances outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003 in
respect of the above transactions are shown in Notes 11 and
15.
|
|
5 |
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Shell Group companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,557 |
|
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
Associated companies
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,730 |
|
|
|
1,996 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income in 2004 includes gains from the disposal of the
Shell Groups interest in Sinopec ($0.3 billion), and
Fluxys and Distrigas ($0.5 billion). Other income in 2003
included a $1.3 billion gain from the disposal of the Shell
Groups interest in Ruhrgas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Shell Group companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest incurred
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
less interest capitalised
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
Associated companies
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
1,324 |
|
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
(a) |
Taxation charge for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Shell Group companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current tax charge
|
|
|
13,585 |
|
|
|
8,200 |
|
|
|
6,658 |
|
|
Deferred tax charge/(credit)
|
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,072 |
|
|
|
7,889 |
|
|
|
6,665 |
|
Associated companies
|
|
|
2,065 |
|
|
|
1,463 |
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,137 |
|
|
|
9,352 |
|
|
|
7,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliations of the expected tax charge of Shell Group
companies to the actual tax charge are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Expected tax charge at statutory rates
|
|
|
13,718 |
|
|
|
8,913 |
|
|
|
6,512 |
|
Adjustments in respect of prior years
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
(252 |
) |
Other reconciling items
|
|
|
(594 |
) |
|
|
(1,190 |
) |
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxation charge of Shell Group companies
|
|
|
13,072 |
|
|
|
7,889 |
|
|
|
6,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The taxation charge of Shell Group companies includes not only
income taxes of general application but also income taxes at
special rates levied on income from Exploration & Production
activities and various additional income and other taxes to
which these activities are subject.
Earnings retained by the subsidiary and associated companies of
the Shell Group amounted to $34,374 million at
December 31, 2004 (2003: $25,210 million; 2002:
$18,060 million). A portion of these retained earnings will flow
up to Royal Dutch and Shell Transport without tax cost. The
balance of these retained earnings have been, or will be,
substantially reinvested by the companies concerned and
provision has not been made for taxes on possible future
distribution of these undistributed earnings as it is not
meaningful to provide for these taxes nor is it practicable to
estimate their full amount or the withholding tax element.
Tax adjustments in respect of prior years relate to events in
the current period and reflect the effects of changes in rules,
facts or other factors compared to those used in establishing
the tax position or deferred tax balance.
Other reconciling items in 2004 mainly comprises the effects of
disposals during the year that were taxed below the statutory
rate.
Other reconciling items in 2003 include the effects of disposals
during the year that were taxed below the statutory rate
(including $534 million from the disposal of the Shell
Groups interest in Ruhrgas), in addition to
$442 million relating to the effects on deferred tax
accounts of legislative changes to certain ring-fencing
arrangements.
Other reconciling items in 2002 include $415 million due to
the increase in the UK upstream corporate tax rate during the
year.
F-20
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Taxes on activities of Shell Group companies
|
|
|
5,606 |
|
|
|
2,148 |
|
Sales taxes, excise duties and similar levies and social law
taxes
|
|
|
4,279 |
|
|
|
3,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,885 |
|
|
|
5,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
Provision for deferred taxation |
The provision for deferred taxation comprises the following tax
effects of temporary differences:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Tangible and intangible fixed assets
|
|
|
17,738 |
|
|
|
17,365 |
|
Pensions and similar obligations
|
|
|
2,653 |
|
|
|
2,118 |
|
Other items
|
|
|
2,568 |
|
|
|
2,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
22,959 |
|
|
|
22,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax losses carried forward
|
|
|
(4,214 |
) |
|
|
(3,876 |
) |
Foreign tax
credits(a)
|
|
|
(2,042 |
) |
|
|
(1,633 |
) |
US
trademark(b)
|
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
|
(309 |
) |
Provisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pensions and similar obligations
|
|
|
(1,228 |
) |
|
|
(1,329 |
) |
|
Decommissioning and restoration costs
|
|
|
(2,191 |
) |
|
|
(1,934 |
) |
|
Environmental and other provisions
|
|
|
(455 |
) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
Tangible and intangible fixed assets
|
|
|
(461 |
) |
|
|
(153 |
) |
Other items
|
|
|
(3,266 |
) |
|
|
(3,268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(14,104 |
) |
|
|
(12,836 |
) |
Asset valuation allowance
|
|
|
3,994 |
|
|
|
3,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets net of valuation allowance
|
|
|
(10,110 |
) |
|
|
(9,039 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
|
12,849 |
|
|
|
13,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presented in the Combined Statement of Assets and Liabilities as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
1,995 |
|
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
14,844 |
|
|
|
15,185 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Foreign tax credits represent surplus credits arising in holding
and sub-holding Shell Group companies on income from other
jurisdictions. A valuation allowance has been recorded against
the substantial part of these balances in both 2004 and 2003. |
|
(b) |
|
Deferred tax asset created upon transfer of US trademark rights
from a US wholly-owned Shell Group company to a Netherlands
wholly-owned Shell Group company. |
F-21
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Shell Group has tax losses carried forward amounting to
$12,705 million at December 31, 2004. Of these,
$10,470 million can be carried forward indefinitely. The
remaining $2,235 million expires in the following years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ million | |
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
|
702 |
|
2006
|
|
|
239 |
|
2007
|
|
|
452 |
|
2008
|
|
|
70 |
|
2009 - 2013
|
|
|
404 |
|
2014 - 2019
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
8 |
Tangible and intangible fixed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
Total | |
|
Total | |
|
|
Tangible | |
|
Goodwill | |
|
intangibles | |
|
intangibles | |
|
Shell Group | |
|
Shell Group | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1
|
|
|
181,685 |
|
|
|
4,011 |
|
|
|
2,998 |
|
|
|
7,009 |
|
|
|
188,694 |
|
|
|
163,957 |
|
Capital expenditure
|
|
|
12,440 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
12,734 |
|
|
|
12,252 |
|
Sales, retirements and other
movements(a)
|
|
|
(9,345 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(9,287 |
) |
|
|
(1,770 |
) |
Currency translation differences
|
|
|
8,382 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
8,525 |
|
|
|
14,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
December 31(b)
|
|
|
193,162 |
|
|
|
4,032 |
|
|
|
3,472 |
|
|
|
7,504 |
|
|
|
200,666 |
|
|
|
188,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1
|
|
|
94,597 |
|
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
2,274 |
|
|
|
96,871 |
|
|
|
80,898 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortisation charge
|
|
|
11,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
12,273 |
|
|
|
11,711 |
|
Sales, retirements and other movements
|
|
|
(7,310 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(7,385 |
) |
|
|
(3,711 |
) |
Currency translation differences
|
|
|
4,990 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
5,077 |
|
|
|
7,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
104,222 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
1,273 |
|
|
|
2,614 |
|
|
|
106,836 |
|
|
|
96,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net 2004
|
|
|
88,940 |
|
|
|
2,691 |
|
|
|
2,199 |
|
|
|
4,890 |
|
|
|
93,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net 2003
|
|
|
87,088 |
|
|
|
2,675 |
|
|
|
2,060 |
|
|
|
4,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Sales, retirements and other movements in 2003 include the
effect of a change in accounting policy for certain long-term
agreements (see Note 2). |
|
(b) |
|
Tangible fixed assets at December 31, 2004 include rights
and concessions of $11.1 billion (2003: $12.0 billion). |
Other intangible fixed assets at December 31, 2004 include
$0.8 billion (2003: $0.8 billion) in respect of
Pennzoil-Quaker State trademarks acquired in 2002. The
trademarks are being amortised over an estimated useful life of
forty years. Continued brand maintenance in addition to the
established long-term leadership of these brands in automotive
lubricants and vehicle care markets support this estimate.
Tangible fixed assets at year end, capital expenditure, together
with new investments in associated companies, and the
depreciation, depletion and amortisation charges are shown in
Note 24, classified, consistent with oil and natural gas
industry practice, according to operating activities. Such a
classification, rather than one
F-22
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
according to type of asset, is given in order to permit a better
comparison with other companies having similar activities.
The net balances at December 31 include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Capitalised costs in respect of assets not yet used in operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unproved properties
|
|
|
2,844 |
|
|
|
4,576 |
|
|
Proved properties under development and other assets in the
course of construction
|
|
|
13,491 |
|
|
|
12,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,335 |
|
|
|
17,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unproved properties include capitalised exploratory well costs,
for which the amounts at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
and movements during 2004, 2003 and 2002 are given in the
following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
At January 1
|
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
Additions pending determination of proved reserves
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
Amounts charged to expense
|
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
|
(449 |
) |
|
|
(393 |
) |
Reclassifications to productive wells on determination of proved
reserves
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
Other movements, including acquisitions, disposals and currency
translation effects
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no amounts remaining capitalised (a) in areas
requiring major capital expenditure before production can begin,
where neither drilling of additional exploratory wells is
underway nor firmly planned for the near future, or
(b) beyond 12 months in areas not requiring major
capital expenditure before production can begin.
Depreciation, depletion and amortisation charges for the year
are included within the following headings in the Combined
Statement of Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Cost of sales
|
|
|
9,876 |
|
|
|
9,702 |
|
|
|
7,312 |
|
Selling and distribution expenses
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
1,041 |
|
Administrative expenses
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Exploration
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Research and development
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortisation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from continuing operations
|
|
|
12,152 |
|
|
|
11,491 |
|
|
|
8,528 |
|
|
from discontinued operations
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,273 |
|
|
|
11,711 |
|
|
|
8,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortisation charges for 2004
include $617 million (2003: $1,249 million; 2002:
$191 million) relating to the impairment of tangible fixed
assets, and $5 million (2003: $127 million;
2002: $6 million) relating to the impairment of
intangible fixed assets. Such charges are recorded within cost
of sales. The impairment charges relate to assets held for use
(2004: $229 million; 2003: $1,169 million; 2002:
$105 million) and to assets held for sale (2004:
$393 million; 2003: $207 million; 2002:
$92 million).
F-23
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
For 2004, the majority of the impairment charges were in Oil
Products ($579 million) and were related to the
deterioration in the local operating environment for certain
refinery assets and writing down to expected proceeds of
marketing assets held for sale.
For 2003, the impairments were incurred in Exploration &
Production ($698 million, mainly due to lower production
outlooks in the UK and South America), in Oil Products
($331 million, mainly due to the announced closure of the
Bakersfield refinery and the impact of local economic conditions
in Latin America), in Chemicals ($220 million, mainly in CS
Metals, as anticipated benefits from a prototype technology did
not meet performance expectations) and in Renewables
($127 million for Shell Solar following an extensive review
to assess the value of the business).
For 2002, the majority of the impairment charges (in total
$197 million) were in Oil Products, reflecting plans in the
USA to close surplus base oil production facilities, the closure
of the Pililla base oil and bitumen refinery in the Philippines
and a change in outlook for liquefied petroleum gas assets in
Argentina coupled with the countrys economic downturn.
Depreciation, depletion and amortisation charges for 2004 also
included $570 million relating to the write-off of various
exploration properties mainly in Ireland, Norway and the United
Kingdom, where new information during the year from exploratory
work confirmed lower than expected volume projections (2003:
$366 million, mainly in Brazil and Ireland).
Reflecting their non-current nature, deferred charges and
prepayments due after one year and other non-current assets are
presented separately as part of Other long-term
assets. At December 31, 2004 these include
$3,221 million (2003: $1,989 million) of deferred
charges and prepayments (including amounts in respect of risk
management activities).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Inventories of oil and chemicals
|
|
|
14,488 |
|
|
|
11,742 |
|
Inventories of materials
|
|
|
903 |
|
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,391 |
|
|
|
12,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Trade receivables
|
|
|
23,626 |
|
|
|
17,523 |
|
Amounts owed by associated companies
|
|
|
2,619 |
|
|
|
2,093 |
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
4,061 |
|
|
|
3,647 |
|
Deferred charges and prepayments
|
|
|
7,757 |
|
|
|
5,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,063 |
|
|
|
29,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions for doubtful items deducted from accounts receivable
amounted to $564 million at December 31, 2004 (2003:
$557 million). Deferred charges and prepayments include
amounts in respect of risk management activities.
F-24
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Investments securities mainly comprises a portfolio
of equity and debt securities required to be held long term by
the Shell Group insurance companies as security for their
insurance activities, for which the fair value of
$1,408 million at December 31, 2004 includes an
unrealised gain of $346 million.
$125 million (2003: $125 million) of these securities
are debt securities classified as held-to-maturity, with
maturity falling between one and five years. The remainder are
classified as available for sale, of which $688 million at
December 31, 2004 (2003: $638 million) are debt
securities. Of the available for sale securities, the maturities
of $21 million fall within one year, $411 million fall
between one year and five years, and $256 million exceed
five years.
The carrying amount of securities classified as cash equivalent
is $1,477 million at December 31, 2004 (2003:
$107 million), all of which are debt securities classified
as available for sale.
Total securities at December 31, 2004 amounting to
$814 million (2003: $1,557 million) are listed on
recognised stock exchanges.
During 2004 a Shell Group company disposed of an equity
investment, resulting in the reclassification of an unrealised
gain of $348 million from Other comprehensive income to Net
income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Debentures and other loans
|
|
|
4,661 |
|
|
|
8,181 |
|
Amounts due to banks and other credit institutions (including
long-term debt due within one year)
|
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,709 |
|
|
|
10,460 |
|
Capitalised lease obligations
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
5,762 |
|
|
|
10,569 |
|
less long-term debt due within one year
|
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt excluding long-term debt due within one year
|
|
|
4,471 |
|
|
|
8,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt at December 31, 2003 included
$1.3 billion of non-recourse debt owed by a Shell Group
company, for which a covenant had been breached in 2001. During
2004, this company was disposed of and this debt was relieved in
its entirety.
Short-term debenture balances fell during the year as a
consequence of the Shell Groups reduced need for
commercial paper financing.
F-25
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following relates only to short-term debt excluding
long-term debt due within one year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Maximum amount outstanding at the end of any quarter
|
|
|
6,688 |
|
|
|
9,159 |
|
Average amount outstanding
|
|
|
6,381 |
|
|
|
8,392 |
|
Amounts due to banks and other credit institutions
|
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
2,657 |
|
Unused lines of short-term credit
|
|
|
4,023 |
|
|
|
3,916 |
|
Approximate average interest rate on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average amount outstanding
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
amount outstanding at December 31
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
The amount outstanding at December 31, 2004 includes
$3,315 million of fixed rate and $248 million of
variable rate US dollar debt at an average interest rate of 2%
and 9% respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Debentures and other loans
|
|
|
4,204 |
|
|
|
4,868 |
|
Amounts due to banks and other credit institutions
|
|
|
3,744 |
|
|
|
3,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,948 |
|
|
|
8,592 |
|
Capitalised lease obligations
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
8,600 |
|
|
|
9,100 |
|
add long-term debt due within one year
|
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt including long-term debt due within one year
|
|
|
9,891 |
|
|
|
10,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following relates to long-term debt including the short-term
part but excluding capitalised lease obligations.
The amount at December 31, 2004 of $9,186 million
(2003: $10,357 million) comprises:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
$ million | |
|
interest rate | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
US Dollar denominated debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate
|
|
|
4,925 |
|
|
|
6% |
|
|
Variable rate
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
4% |
|
Non-dollar denominated debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate
|
|
|
3,101 |
|
|
|
4% |
|
|
Variable rate
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The approximate weighted average interest rate in 2004 was 5%
for both US dollar debt and total debt.
F-26
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The aggregate maturities of long-term debts are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ million | |
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
2006
|
|
|
1,884 |
|
2007
|
|
|
2,474 |
|
2008
|
|
|
530 |
|
2009
|
|
|
117 |
|
2010 and after
|
|
|
2,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
During 2004, the Medium Term Note and Commercial Paper
Facilities have been increased to a total level of
$30.0 billion. As at December 31, 2004, debt
outstanding under central borrowing programmes, which includes
these facilities, totalled $8.3 billion with the remaining
indebtedness raised by Shell Group companies with no recourse
beyond the immediate borrower and/or the local assets.
In accordance with the risk management policy, Shell Group
companies have entered into interest rate swap agreements
against most of the fixed rate debt. The use of interest rate
swaps is further discussed in Note 28.
The future minimum lease payments under operating leases and
capital leases and the present value of net minimum capital
lease payments at December 31, 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating | |
|
Capital | |
|
|
leases | |
|
leases | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
2005
|
|
|
1,744 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
2006
|
|
|
1,203 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
2007
|
|
|
958 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
2008
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
2009
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
2010 and after
|
|
|
4,460 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum payments
|
|
|
9,855 |
|
|
|
1,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
less executory costs and interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum capital lease payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The figures above for operating lease payments represent minimum
commitments existing at December 31, 2004 and are not a
forecast of future total rental expense.
Total rental expense for all operating leases was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Minimum rentals
|
|
|
2,140 |
|
|
|
2,135 |
|
|
|
1,557 |
|
Contingent rentals
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
Sub-lease rentals
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,017 |
|
|
|
1,997 |
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
(b) |
Long-term purchase obligations |
Shell Group companies have unconditional long-term purchase
obligations associated with financing arrangements. The
aggregate amount of payments required under such obligations at
December 31, 2004 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ million | |
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
|
461 |
|
2006
|
|
|
420 |
|
2007
|
|
|
413 |
|
2008
|
|
|
385 |
|
2009
|
|
|
380 |
|
2010 and after
|
|
|
3,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
The agreements under which these unconditional purchase
obligations arise relate mainly to the purchase of chemicals
feedstock, utilities and to the use of pipelines.
Payments under these agreements, which include additional sums
depending upon actual quantities of supplies, amounted to
$542 million in 2004 (2003: $252 million).
|
|
15 |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Trade payables
|
|
|
18,716 |
|
|
|
14,110 |
|
Amounts due to associated companies
|
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
1,828 |
|
Pensions and similar obligations
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
Other payables
|
|
|
11,245 |
|
|
|
8,841 |
|
Accruals and deferred income
|
|
|
7,659 |
|
|
|
7,315 |
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,862 |
|
|
|
32,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other payables include amounts in respect of risk management
activities.
|
|
16 |
Long-term liabilities Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Risk management activities
|
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
|
|
1,354 |
|
Environmental liabilities
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
Deposits for return items
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
Liabilities under staff benefit plans
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
Advance payments received under long-term supply contracts
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
Redundancy liabilities
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
Other
|
|
|
2,474 |
|
|
|
2,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,065 |
|
|
|
6,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
These amounts include $1,222 million at December 31,
2004 (2003: $1,305 million) which does not fall due until
more than five years after the respective Balance Sheet dates.
|
|
17 |
Changes in Combined Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shell | |
|
|
|
Shell | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royal Dutch | |
|
Transport | |
|
Total equity | |
|
Transport | |
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary | |
|
Ordinary | |
|
share | |
|
Preference | |
|
paid in | |
|
Treasury | |
|
comprehensive | |
|
Retained | |
|
|
|
|
shares | |
|
shares | |
|
capital | |
|
shares | |
|
capital | |
|
shares | |
|
income | |
|
earnings | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
At 1 January 2002
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
5,385 |
|
|
|
(1,953 |
) |
|
|
(12,162 |
) |
|
|
70,936 |
|
|
|
62,822 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,671 |
|
|
|
9,671 |
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,522 |
) |
|
|
(5,522 |
) |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
unrealised gains/(losses) on securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
unrealised gains/(losses) on cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
minimum pension liability adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,475 |
) |
Purchase of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(981 |
) |
Release of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
Dividends received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
Shares repurchased for cancellation
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,349 |
) |
|
|
(1,365 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1 2003
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
5,375 |
|
|
|
(2,797 |
) |
|
|
(10,729 |
) |
|
|
73,736 |
|
|
|
66,195 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,322 |
|
|
|
12,322 |
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,532 |
) |
|
|
(6,532 |
) |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,795 |
|
|
unrealised gains/(losses) on securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
unrealised gains/(losses) on cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
minimum pension liability adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358 |
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(715 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(715 |
) |
Release of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
Dividends received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
Shares repurchased for cancellation
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1 2004
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
5,372 |
|
|
|
(3,428 |
) |
|
|
(3,836 |
) |
|
|
79,536 |
|
|
|
78,251 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,182 |
|
|
|
18,182 |
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,396 |
) |
|
|
(7,396 |
) |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,548 |
|
|
unrealised gains/(losses) on securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
unrealised gains/(losses) on cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
minimum pension liability adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
Purchase of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(848 |
) |
Release of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
Shares repurchased for cancellation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(778 |
) |
|
|
(777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31 2004
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
5,374 |
|
|
|
(4,187 |
) |
|
|
(792 |
) |
|
|
89,544 |
|
|
|
90,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Allotted, called up and fully paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royal Dutch Ordinary Shares
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
Shell Transport Ordinary Shares
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number of shares outstanding at December 31, 2004 and
2003 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shell Transport | |
|
|
Royal Dutch | |
|
and Trading | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Shares outstanding at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
2,081,725,000 |
|
|
|
9,624,900,000 |
|
Shares outstanding at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
2,083,500,000 |
|
|
|
9,667,500,000 |
|
Under the terms of the Transaction, Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport Ordinary shares were exchanged at the agreed ratios
set forth in Note 1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
number of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
$ million | |
Allotted, called up and fully paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
448 Royal Dutch
priority shares
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
£1 Shell Transport First Preference Shares
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
£1 Shell Transport Second Preference Shares
|
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
Combined Statement of Cash Flows |
This statement reflects the cash flows arising from the
activities of Shell Group companies as measured in their own
currencies, translated to US dollars at quarterly average rates
of exchange.
Accordingly, the cash flows recorded in the Combined Statement
of Cash Flows exclude both the currency translation differences
which arise as a result of translating the assets and
liabilities of non-US dollar Shell Group companies to US dollars
at year-end rates of exchange (except for those arising on cash
and cash equivalents) and non-cash investing and financing
activities. These currency translation differences and non-cash
investing and financing activities must therefore be added to
the cash flow movements at average rates in order to arrive at
the movements derived from the Combined Balance Sheet.
F-30
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Movements | |
|
|
Movements | |
|
Movements | |
|
|
|
derived from | |
|
|
derived from | |
|
arising from | |
|
|
|
Statement of | |
|
|
Statement of | |
|
currency | |
|
Non-cash | |
|
Assets and | |
|
|
Cash Flows | |
|
translation | |
|
movements | |
|
Liabilities | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Tangible and intangible fixed assets
|
|
|
(2,626 |
) |
|
|
3,447 |
|
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
Investments
|
|
|
(2,075 |
) |
|
|
1,598 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
(283 |
) |
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
3,293 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
2,731 |
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
(721 |
) |
|
|
2,701 |
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
8,462 |
|
|
|
1,348 |
|
|
|
(760 |
) |
|
|
9,050 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
8,199 |
|
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,091 |
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
4,370 |
|
|
|
(898 |
) |
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
4,807 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(7,317 |
) |
|
|
(794 |
) |
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
(7,479 |
) |
Taxes payable
|
|
|
(2,997 |
) |
|
|
(579 |
) |
|
|
(382 |
) |
|
|
(3,958 |
) |
Long-term debt
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
(357 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(1,441 |
) |
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
|
(2,011 |
) |
Deferred taxation
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
(673 |
) |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
Other provisions
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
(471 |
) |
|
|
(1,252 |
) |
|
|
(1,871 |
) |
Minority interests
|
|
|
(1,257 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(528 |
) |
|
|
(1,894 |
) |
Other items
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment for Treasury stock and Other comprehensive income
excluding currency translation differences
|
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Movement in retained earnings of Shell Group companies
|
|
|
10,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Movement in cumulative currency translation differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Movement in net assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid by Shell Group companies totalled
$11.6 billion in 2004 (2003: $8.6 billion; 2002:
$6.7 billion). Interest paid by Shell Group companies was
$0.9 billion in 2004 (2003: $0.9 billion; 2002:
$1.0 billion).
The main non-cash movements relate to the impact on the Balance
Sheet of divestments, particularly of the Shell Groups
interest in Rayong Refinery which held $1.3 billion of
short-term debt. There was also a review of the estimated
provision for decommissioning and restoration costs during 2004
based on current experience and techniques which resulted in an
increase of approximately $1.1 billion in both the
provision and the corresponding tangible fixed assets.
|
|
20 |
Employee retirement plans and other postretirement
benefits |
Retirement plans are provided for permanent employees of all
major Shell Group companies. The nature of such plans varies
according to the legal and fiscal requirements and economic
conditions of the country in which the employees are engaged.
Generally, the plans provide defined benefits based on
employees years of service and average final remuneration.
The principal plans in the Shell Group use a December 31
measurement date.
F-31
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Some Shell Group companies have established unfunded defined
benefit plans to provide certain postretirement healthcare and
life insurance benefits to their retirees, the entitlement to
which is usually based on the employee remaining in service up
to retirement age and the completion of a minimum service period.
The Shell Group has accounted for the impact of the United
States Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization
(Medicare) Act of 2003, with effect from
January 1, 2004. The impact was a $300 million
reduction in the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
at January 1, 2004 and a $52 million reduction in
postretirement benefit cost for 2004. There was no reduction to
accumulated postretirement benefit obligations of
$159 million at January 1, 2004, for certain
separately administered retiree benefit plans which must be
analysed under final government regulations. The first subsidies
arising from the Medicare Act are expected to be received in
2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other benefits | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Pension benefits | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Change in benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations for benefits based on employee service to date at
January 1
|
|
|
46,476 |
|
|
|
39,109 |
|
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
3,032 |
|
|
|
2,068 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
2,445 |
|
Increase in present value of the obligation for benefits based
on employee service during the year
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Interest on the obligation for benefits in respect of employee
service in previous years
|
|
|
2,529 |
|
|
|
2,333 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
Benefit payments made
|
|
|
(2,350 |
) |
|
|
(2,034 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
) |
Currency translation effects
|
|
|
3,461 |
|
|
|
5,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Other
components(a)
|
|
|
3,620 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations for benefits based on employee service to date at
December 31
|
|
|
54,822 |
|
|
|
46,476 |
|
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
3,120 |
|
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
3,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets held in trust at fair value at January 1
|
|
|
43,960 |
|
|
|
33,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
5,262 |
|
|
|
6,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit payments made
|
|
|
(2,350 |
) |
|
|
(2,034 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation effects
|
|
|
3,367 |
|
|
|
4,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
components(a)
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets held in trust at fair value at December 31
|
|
|
51,874 |
|
|
|
43,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets in excess of/(less than) the present value of
obligations for benefits at December 31
|
|
|
(2,948 |
) |
|
|
(2,516 |
) |
|
|
(2,509 |
) |
|
|
(611 |
) |
|
|
(3,120 |
) |
|
|
(2,520 |
) |
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
(3,032 |
) |
Unrecognised net (gains)/losses remaining from the adoption of
current method of determining pension costs
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognised net (gains)/losses since adoption
|
|
|
9,888 |
|
|
|
7,295 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
Unrecognised prior service cost/(credit)
|
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
1,258 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognised
|
|
|
8,128 |
|
|
|
6,042 |
|
|
|
(1,816 |
) |
|
|
(423 |
) |
|
|
(2,239 |
) |
|
|
(1,726 |
) |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
(2,089 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other benefits | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Pension benefits | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Amounts recognised in the Statement of Assets and
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid benefit costs
|
|
|
8,278 |
|
|
|
6,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
Long-term
|
|
|
(2,878 |
) |
|
|
(2,917 |
) |
|
|
(1,776 |
) |
|
|
(390 |
) |
|
|
(2,166 |
) |
|
|
(1,675 |
) |
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
(2,010 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,540 |
|
|
|
3,743 |
|
|
|
(1,816 |
) |
|
|
(423 |
) |
|
|
(2,239 |
) |
|
|
(1,726 |
) |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
(2,089 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount recognised in Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
2,588 |
|
|
|
2,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognised
|
|
|
8,128 |
|
|
|
6,042 |
|
|
|
(1,816 |
) |
|
|
(423 |
) |
|
|
(2,239 |
) |
|
|
(1,726 |
) |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
(2,089 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Other components comprise mainly the effect of changes in
actuarial assumptions, most notably the discount rate and in
2004 the impact of accounting for the US Medicare Act on the
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at January 1. |
|
|
|
Additional information on pension benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Obligation for pension benefits in respect of unfunded plans
|
|
|
2,032 |
|
|
|
2,155 |
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
48,654 |
|
|
|
41,865 |
|
For employee retirement plans with projected benefit obligation
in excess of plan assets, the respective amounts are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
36,246 |
|
|
|
30,291 |
|
|
Plan assets
|
|
|
33,646 |
|
|
|
28,176 |
|
For employee retirement plans with accumulated benefit
obligation in excess of plan assets, the respective amounts are: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
11,844 |
|
|
|
10,452 |
|
|
Plan assets
|
|
|
10,734 |
|
|
|
9,356 |
|
Employer contributions to defined benefit pension plans during
2005 are estimated to be $1.4 billion. The following
benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as
appropriate, are expected to be paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other benefits | |
|
|
Pension | |
|
| |
|
|
benefits | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
2005
|
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
2006
|
|
|
2,664 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
2007
|
|
|
2,738 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
2008
|
|
|
2,829 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
2009
|
|
|
2,908 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
2010 - 2014
|
|
|
15,759 |
|
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
1,083 |
|
F-33
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Benefit costs for the year comprise:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other benefits | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Pension benefits | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Service cost
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
2,529 |
|
|
|
2,333 |
|
|
|
2,001 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(3,894 |
) |
|
|
(3,547 |
) |
|
|
(3,339 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other components
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of defined benefit plans
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
(539 |
) |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
Payments to defined contribution plans
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
(455 |
) |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rates, projected rates of remuneration growth and
expected rates of return on plan assets vary for the different
plans as they are determined in the light of local conditions.
Expected rates of return on plan assets are calculated using a
common assumption-setting process based on a projection of real
long-term bond yields and an equity risk premium which are
combined with local inflation assumptions and applied to each
plans actual asset mix. The weighted averages applicable
for the principal plans in the Shell Group are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other benefits | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Pension benefits | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.1% |
|
|
|
5.6% |
|
|
|
5.9% |
|
|
|
5.8% |
|
|
|
5.0% |
|
|
|
6.0% |
|
|
|
5.6% |
|
|
|
6.5% |
|
|
|
5.6% |
|
Projected rate of remuneration growth
|
|
|
3.8% |
|
|
|
3.9% |
|
|
|
4.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions used to determine benefit costs for year ended
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.6% |
|
|
|
5.9% |
|
|
|
6.0% |
|
|
|
6.0% |
|
|
|
5.6% |
|
|
|
6.5% |
|
|
|
5.6% |
|
|
|
7.0% |
|
|
|
6.0% |
|
Expected rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
7.6% |
|
|
|
7.9% |
|
|
|
8.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected rate of remuneration growth
|
|
|
3.9% |
|
|
|
4.0% |
|
|
|
4.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare cost trend rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare cost trend rate in year after reporting year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0% |
|
|
|
3.7% |
|
|
|
10.0% |
|
|
|
3.9% |
|
|
|
7.8% |
|
|
|
4.6% |
|
Ultimate healthcare cost trend rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0% |
|
|
|
2.9% |
|
|
|
5.0% |
|
|
|
2.9% |
|
|
|
5.0% |
|
|
|
2.9% |
|
Year ultimate healthcare cost trend rate is applicable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
The effect of a one percentage point increase/(decrease) in the
annual rate of increase in the assumed healthcare cost trend
rates would be to increase/(decrease) annual postretirement
benefit cost by approximately
$35 million/($25 million) and the accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation by approximately
$456 million/($374 million).
F-34
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Weighted-average plan asset allocations by asset category and
the target allocation for December 31, 2004 for the
principal pension plans in the Shell Group are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
|
Target | |
|
plan assets at | |
|
|
allocation | |
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity securities
|
|
|
72% |
|
|
|
73% |
|
|
|
73% |
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
23% |
|
|
|
21% |
|
|
|
22% |
|
Real estate
|
|
|
2% |
|
|
|
2% |
|
|
|
2% |
|
Other
|
|
|
3% |
|
|
|
4% |
|
|
|
3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan long-term investment strategies are generally determined by
the responsible Pension Fund Trustees using a structured
asset-liability modelling approach to determine the asset mix
which best meets the objectives of optimising investment return
and maintaining adequate funding levels.
|
|
21 |
Employee emoluments and numbers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Remuneration
|
|
|
8,125 |
|
|
|
7,477 |
|
|
|
6,096 |
|
Social law taxes
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
Pensions and similar obligations (Note 21)
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,346 |
|
|
|
8,675 |
|
|
|
6,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
thousands | |
Exploration & Production
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Gas & Power
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Oil Products
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Chemicals
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Corporate and Other
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
thousands | |
Exploration & Production
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Gas & Power
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Oil Products
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Chemicals
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Corporate and Other
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-35
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In addition to remuneration above, there were charges for
redundancy of $526 million in 2004 (2003:
$291 million; 2002: $215 million).
The charges relate to 4,000 employees in 2004 (mainly in the Oil
Products segment, primarily due to portfolio restructuring, and
in the Corporate and Other segment due to restructuring in
information and technology), 2,000 employees in 2003 (mainly in
the Exploration & Production and Oil Products segments)
and 2,600 employees in 2002 (mainly in the
Exploration & Production and Oil Products segments).
The liabilities for redundancies at December 31, 2004 and
2003, and movements during 2004 and 2003 are given in the
following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
At January 1
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
Charges
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
Payments
|
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
Other movements and currency translation effects
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
Stock-based compensation plans |
On July 20, 2005 Royal Dutch Shell became the parent
company of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport by way of the
transactions described in Note 1. At the same date the
rights to shares of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport under the
stock-based compensation schemes were exchanged for equivalent
rights to Royal Dutch Shell shares on the basis of the exchange
ratios set out in Note 1.
Certain Shell Group companies have in place various stock-based
plans for senior staff and other employees of those and other
Shell Group companies. Details of the principal plans are given
below.
The Shell Group Stock Option Plans offer eligible employees
options over Royal Dutch Ordinary Shares (Royal Dutch shares) or
Shell Transport Ordinary Shares (Shell Transport shares) at a
price not less than the fair market value of the shares at the
date the options were granted. The options are exercisable three
years from grant, except for those granted under the US plans,
which vest a third per year for three years. The options lapse
ten years after grant, however leaving Shell Group employment
may cause options to lapse earlier. For Shell Group Managing
Directors and the most senior executives, 100% of the options
granted in 2003 (and in subsequent years) are subject to
performance conditions.
Under the Restricted Stock Plan, grants are made on a highly
selective basis to senior staff. A maximum of 250,000 Royal
Dutch Ordinary Shares (or equivalent value in Shell Transport
Ordinary Shares) can be granted under the plan in any year.
Shares are granted subject to a three-year restriction period
and the number of shares awarded is based on the share price at
the start of the restricted period. The shares, together with
additional shares equivalent to the value of the dividends
payable over the restriction period, are released to the
individual at the end of the three-year period.
F-36
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table shows for 2003 and 2004, in respect of
option plans, the number of shares under option at the beginning
of the year, the number of options granted, exercised and
expired during the year and the number of shares under option at
the end of the year, together with their weighted average
exercise price translated at the respective year-end exchange
rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royal Dutch Ordinary | |
|
Shell Transport | |
|
Shell Canada common | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Ordinary Shares | |
|
shares(a) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
average | |
|
|
|
average | |
|
|
|
average | |
|
|
|
|
exercise | |
|
|
|
exercise | |
|
|
|
exercise | |
|
|
Number | |
|
price | |
|
Number | |
|
price | |
|
Number | |
|
price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(thousands) | |
|
($) | |
|
(thousands) | |
|
($) | |
|
(thousands) | |
|
($) | |
Under option at January 1, 2003
|
|
|
33,381 |
|
|
|
59.86 |
|
|
|
101,447 |
|
|
|
8.26 |
|
|
|
4,777 |
|
|
|
21.71 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
15,643 |
|
|
|
45.13 |
|
|
|
41,893 |
|
|
|
6.74 |
|
|
|
1,674 |
|
|
|
35.65 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
6.47 |
|
|
|
(505 |
) |
|
|
22.88 |
|
Expired
|
|
|
(1,003 |
) |
|
|
64.03 |
|
|
|
(2,813 |
) |
|
|
8.92 |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
26.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under option at December 31,
2003(b)
|
|
|
48,021 |
|
|
|
60.09 |
|
|
|
140,335 |
|
|
|
8.44 |
|
|
|
5,873 |
|
|
|
29.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
14,816 |
|
|
|
52.42 |
|
|
|
42,998 |
|
|
|
7.47 |
|
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
45.99 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(495 |
) |
|
|
47.20 |
|
|
|
(1,341 |
) |
|
|
7.10 |
|
|
|
(1,175 |
) |
|
|
22.73 |
|
Expired
|
|
|
(1,644 |
) |
|
|
68.14 |
|
|
|
(6,033 |
) |
|
|
9.69 |
|
|
|
(285 |
) |
|
|
25.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under option at December 31,
2004(b)
|
|
|
60,698 |
|
|
|
60.56 |
|
|
|
175,959 |
|
|
|
8.73 |
|
|
|
6,110 |
|
|
|
37.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Unissued. |
|
(b) |
|
The underlying weighted average exercise prices for Royal Dutch
and Shell Transport shares under option at December 31,
2004 were 44.42
(2003: 47.64)
and £4.53 (2003: £4.73) respectively. |
The following tables provide further information about the
options outstanding at December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royal Dutch Ordinary Shares | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Options outstanding | |
|
Options exercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
remaining | |
|
average | |
|
|
|
average | |
|
|
|
|
contractual | |
|
exercise | |
|
|
|
exercise | |
Range of exercise prices |
|
Number | |
|
life | |
|
price | |
|
Number | |
|
price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(thousands) | |
|
(years) | |
|
($) | |
|
(thousands) | |
|
($) | |
$40 to $45
|
|
|
6,541 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
42.25 |
|
|
|
2,027 |
|
|
|
42.24 |
|
$45 to $50
|
|
|
7,096 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
48.65 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
45.71 |
|
$50 to $55
|
|
|
19,118 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
52.72 |
|
|
|
6,241 |
|
|
|
53.49 |
|
$55 to $60
|
|
|
8,354 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
56.30 |
|
|
|
2,353 |
|
|
|
56.21 |
|
$60 to $65
|
|
|
3,759 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
60.77 |
|
|
|
3,759 |
|
|
|
60.77 |
|
$65 to $70
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
66.70 |
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
66.70 |
|
$75 to $80
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
76.94 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
76.94 |
|
$80 to $85
|
|
|
9,503 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
82.92 |
|
|
|
1,959 |
|
|
|
81.34 |
|
$85 to $90
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
85.36 |
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
85.36 |
|
$90 to $95
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
94.11 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
94.11 |
|
$95 to $100
|
|
|
3,202 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
96.21 |
|
|
|
3,202 |
|
|
|
96.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$40 to $100
|
|
|
60,698 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
60.56 |
|
|
|
22,889 |
|
|
|
65.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-37
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shell Transport Ordinary Shares | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Options outstanding | |
|
Options exercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
remaining | |
|
average | |
|
|
|
average | |
|
|
|
|
contractual | |
|
exercise | |
|
|
|
exercise | |
Range of exercise prices |
|
Number | |
|
life | |
|
price | |
|
Number | |
|
price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(thousands) | |
|
(years) | |
|
($) | |
|
(thousands) | |
|
($) | |
$7 to $8
|
|
|
93,250 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
7.36 |
|
|
|
9,847 |
|
|
|
7.00 |
|
$8 to $9
|
|
|
6,937 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
8.45 |
|
|
|
6,137 |
|
|
|
8.47 |
|
$9 to $10
|
|
|
11,694 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
9.74 |
|
|
|
11,694 |
|
|
|
9.74 |
|
$10 to $11
|
|
|
51,761 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
10.29 |
|
|
|
14,110 |
|
|
|
10.64 |
|
$11 to $12
|
|
|
12,317 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
11.80 |
|
|
|
12,317 |
|
|
|
11.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$7 to $12
|
|
|
175,959 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
8.73 |
|
|
|
54,105 |
|
|
|
9.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the UK, The Shell Petroleum Company Limited and Shell
Petroleum N.V. each operate a savings-related stock option
scheme, under which options are granted over shares of Shell
Transport at prices not less than the market value on a date not
more than 30 days before the date of the grant of option
and are normally exercisable after completion of a three-year or
five-year contractual savings period. The following table shows
for 2003 and 2004, in respect of these plans, the number of
Shell Transport Ordinary Shares under option at the beginning of
the year, the number of options granted, exercised and expired
during the year and the number of shares under option at the end
of the year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
thousands | |
Under option at January 1
|
|
|
15,089 |
|
|
|
18,680 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,975 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,924 |
) |
|
|
(707 |
) |
Expired
|
|
|
(2,634 |
) |
|
|
(7,859 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under option at December 31
|
|
|
10,531 |
|
|
|
15,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain Shell Group companies have incentive compensation plans
containing stock appreciation rights linked to the value of
Royal Dutch Ordinary Shares. During 2004 1,375,989 of these
stock appreciation rights were exercised and 21,833 forfeited,
leaving a balance of 7,484,779 at December 31, 2004 (2003:
8,882,601).
In 2001, the Global Employee Share Purchase Plan was implemented
giving eligible employees the opportunity to buy Royal Dutch or
Shell Transport Ordinary Shares, with 15% added after a
specified holding period. At December 31, 2004 16,024
(2003: 4,754) Royal Dutch Ordinary Shares and 25,881 (2003:
19,742) Shell Transport Ordinary Shares were held by Shell Group
companies in connection with the Global Employee Share Purchase
Plan.
F-38
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Effects on Shell Group net income and Earnings per share
under the fair value method |
A comparison of the Shell Groups net income and Earnings
per share for both Royal Dutch and Shell Transport as reported
under the intrinsic value method and on a pro forma basis
calculated as if the fair value of options and share purchase
rights granted would have been considered as compensation
expense is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Pro forma | |
|
Pro forma | |
|
Pro forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Shell Group net income ($ million)
|
|
|
18,182 |
|
|
|
17,937 |
|
|
|
12,322 |
|
|
|
12,045 |
|
|
|
9,671 |
|
|
|
9,468 |
|
Basic earnings per share attributable to Royal
Dutch ($)(a)
|
|
|
5.39 |
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
|
3.63 |
|
|
|
3.55 |
|
|
|
2.82 |
|
|
|
2.76 |
|
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Royal
Dutch ($)(a)
|
|
|
5.39 |
|
|
|
5.31 |
|
|
|
3.63 |
|
|
|
3.55 |
|
|
|
2.81 |
|
|
|
2.76 |
|
Basic earnings per ADR attributable to Shell
Transport ($)(a)
|
|
|
4.60 |
|
|
|
4.54 |
|
|
|
3.10 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
|
|
|
2.36 |
|
Diluted earnings per ADR attributable to Shell
Transport ($)(a)
|
|
|
4.60 |
|
|
|
4.54 |
|
|
|
3.10 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
|
|
|
2.36 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Based on Royal Dutch and Shell Transport Ordinary Shares/numbers
before unification. |
The fair value of the Shell Groups 2004 option grants was
estimated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model and the
following assumptions for US dollar, euro and sterling
denominated options respectively: risk-free interest rates of
3.5%, 3.1% and 4.9%; dividend yield of 4.1%, 4.5% and 4.0%;
volatility of 28.2%, 30.3% and 31.7% and expected lives of five
to seven years.
|
|
23 |
Decommissioning and restoration costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Short-term | |
|
Long-term | |
|
Total | |
|
Short-term | |
|
Long-term | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
At January 1
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
3,955 |
|
|
|
4,044 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
3,528 |
|
|
|
3,599 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
policy(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
Liabilities incurred
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
Liabilities settled
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
Accretion expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Reclassifications and other movements
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Currency translation differences
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
5,709 |
|
|
|
5,894 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
3,955 |
|
|
|
4,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
US accounting standard FAS 143 (Asset Retirement Obligations)
was effective from the beginning of 2003 (see Note 2). |
A review of the estimated provision for decommissioning and
restoration costs was performed during 2004 based on current
experience and techniques. This resulted in an increase of
$1.1 billion in both the provision and corresponding
tangible fixed assets, reported within other movements.
For the purposes of calculating provisions for decommissioning
and restoration costs, estimated total ultimate liabilities of
$9.8 billion at December 31, 2004 (2003:
$7.5 billion) were used. Such estimates are subject to
various regulatory and technological developments.
F-39
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
24 |
Information by geographical area and by industry
segment(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Net | |
|
Fixed | |
|
Net | |
|
Fixed | |
|
Net | |
|
Fixed | |
|
|
proceeds | |
|
assets | |
|
proceeds | |
|
assets | |
|
proceeds | |
|
assets | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Europe
|
|
|
94,904 |
|
|
|
37,930 |
|
|
|
70,375 |
|
|
|
37,686 |
|
|
|
62,575 |
|
|
|
36,516 |
|
Other Eastern Hemisphere
|
|
|
49,482 |
|
|
|
36,977 |
|
|
|
37,482 |
|
|
|
33,530 |
|
|
|
32,406 |
|
|
|
28,492 |
|
USA
|
|
|
102,877 |
|
|
|
27,580 |
|
|
|
75,109 |
|
|
|
30,343 |
|
|
|
54,677 |
|
|
|
27,266 |
|
Other Western Hemisphere
|
|
|
17,927 |
|
|
|
13,834 |
|
|
|
15,396 |
|
|
|
13,038 |
|
|
|
13,795 |
|
|
|
11,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Group
|
|
|
265,190 |
|
|
|
116,321 |
|
|
|
198,362 |
|
|
|
114,597 |
|
|
|
163,453 |
|
|
|
104,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
As a consequence of the separate reporting of income from
discontinued operations (see Note 3), information for
comparative periods has been reclassified where necessary. |
(b) Industry
segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Total | |
|
Exploration | |
|
Gas & | |
|
Oil | |
|
|
|
Corporate | |
|
|
Shell Group | |
|
& Production | |
|
Power | |
|
Products | |
|
Chemicals | |
|
and Other | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
265,190 |
|
|
|
20,643 |
|
|
|
9,604 |
|
|
|
207,006 |
|
|
|
26,877 |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
inter-segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,001 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
11,924 |
|
|
|
2,620 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,644 |
|
|
|
10,814 |
|
|
|
218,930 |
|
|
|
29,497 |
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit/(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shell Group companies
|
|
|
26,254 |
|
|
|
18,386 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
7,152 |
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
(860 |
) |
|
Shell Group share of associated companies
|
|
|
5,653 |
|
|
|
2,438 |
|
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,907 |
|
|
|
20,824 |
|
|
|
1,715 |
|
|
|
8,901 |
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
(872 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
1,730 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,213 |
|
Currency exchange gains/(losses)
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
59 |
|
Taxation
|
|
|
15,137 |
|
|
|
12,033 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
2,691 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
(410 |
) |
Income applicable to minority interests
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
16,622 |
|
|
|
8,957 |
|
|
|
2,069 |
|
|
|
6,281 |
|
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
(989 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of
tax(a)
|
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
18,182 |
|
|
|
9,315 |
|
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
|
7,537 |
|
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
(1,041 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at December 31
|
|
|
193,626 |
|
|
|
68,199 |
|
|
|
23,214 |
|
|
|
71,447 |
|
|
|
18,330 |
|
|
|
12,406 |
|
Total liabilities at December 31
|
|
|
(97,862 |
) |
|
|
(44,602 |
) |
|
|
(15,897 |
) |
|
|
(44,509 |
) |
|
|
(8,062 |
) |
|
|
15,208 |
|
Tangible fixed assets at December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
193,162 |
|
|
|
115,404 |
|
|
|
8,028 |
|
|
|
53,773 |
|
|
|
14,561 |
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(104,222 |
) |
|
|
(63,411 |
) |
|
|
(1,107 |
) |
|
|
(30,689 |
) |
|
|
(8,381 |
) |
|
|
(634 |
) |
Goodwill at December 31
|
|
|
2,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Investments in associated companies at December 31
|
|
|
19,743 |
|
|
|
4,762 |
|
|
|
4,312 |
|
|
|
6,206 |
|
|
|
4,139 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
Capital expenditure and new investments in associated
companies
|
|
|
13,792 |
|
|
|
8,745 |
|
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
|
2,466 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortisation charge from
continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
11,530 |
|
|
|
8,132 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
2,476 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
F-40
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Total | |
|
Exploration | |
|
Gas & | |
|
Oil | |
|
|
|
Corporate | |
|
|
Shell Group | |
|
& Production | |
|
Power | |
|
Products | |
|
Chemicals | |
|
and Other | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
198,362 |
|
|
|
12,224 |
|
|
|
7,377 |
|
|
|
159,075 |
|
|
|
18,843 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
|
inter-segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,244 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,468 |
|
|
|
8,227 |
|
|
|
162,491 |
|
|
|
20,817 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit/(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shell Group companies
|
|
|
17,860 |
|
|
|
14,968 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
3,175 |
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(681 |
) |
|
Shell Group share of associated companies
|
|
|
3,446 |
|
|
|
1,857 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,306 |
|
|
|
16,825 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
4,085 |
|
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(708 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
1,996 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
610 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,324 |
|
Currency exchange gains/(losses)
|
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
Taxation
|
|
|
9,352 |
|
|
|
8,307 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
1,202 |
|
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(500 |
) |
Income applicable to minority interests
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
12,042 |
|
|
|
8,590 |
|
|
|
2,270 |
|
|
|
2,821 |
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
(1,077 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of
tax(a)
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
12,322 |
|
|
|
8,923 |
|
|
|
2,289 |
|
|
|
2,860 |
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
(1,175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at December 31
|
|
|
169,737 |
|
|
|
63,641 |
|
|
|
19,212 |
|
|
|
64,725 |
|
|
|
15,297 |
|
|
|
6,862 |
|
Total liabilities at December 31
|
|
|
(88,215 |
) |
|
|
(47,866 |
) |
|
|
(13,277 |
) |
|
|
(42,549 |
) |
|
|
(7,888 |
) |
|
|
23,365 |
|
Tangible fixed assets at December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
181,685 |
|
|
|
105,540 |
|
|
|
6,934 |
|
|
|
53,556 |
|
|
|
14,028 |
|
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(94,597 |
) |
|
|
(56,265 |
) |
|
|
(985 |
) |
|
|
(28,784 |
) |
|
|
(7,851 |
) |
|
|
(712 |
) |
Goodwill at December 31
|
|
|
2,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
2,455 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Investments in associated companies at December 31
|
|
|
19,371 |
|
|
|
4,108 |
|
|
|
4,924 |
|
|
|
5,965 |
|
|
|
4,017 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
Capital expenditure and new investments in associated
companies
|
|
|
13,235 |
|
|
|
8,278 |
|
|
|
1,511 |
|
|
|
2,405 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortisation charge from
continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
10,203 |
|
|
|
7,048 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
2,455 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
$88 million of income applicable to minority interests is
deducted in arriving at income from discontinued operations for
the Shell Group in 2004 (2003: $13 million). |
F-41
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Total | |
|
Exploration | |
|
Gas & | |
|
Oil | |
|
|
|
Corporate | |
|
|
Shell Group | |
|
& Production | |
|
Power | |
|
Products | |
|
Chemicals | |
|
and Other | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
163,453 |
|
|
|
11,640 |
|
|
|
4,254 |
|
|
|
132,681 |
|
|
|
14,125 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
inter-segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,680 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
3,080 |
|
|
|
1,082 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,320 |
|
|
|
4,874 |
|
|
|
135,761 |
|
|
|
15,207 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit/(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shell Group companies
|
|
|
15,056 |
|
|
|
11,976 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
3,009 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
Shell Group share of associated companies
|
|
|
2,792 |
|
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,848 |
|
|
|
13,292 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
3,563 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
(476 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,291 |
|
Currency exchange gains/(losses)
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
77 |
|
Taxation
|
|
|
7,655 |
|
|
|
6,724 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
(358 |
) |
Income applicable to minority interests
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
9,484 |
|
|
|
6,641 |
|
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
2,485 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
(779 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
9,671 |
|
|
|
6,726 |
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
2,627 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
(846 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at December 31
|
|
|
153,291 |
|
|
|
56,988 |
|
|
|
16,057 |
|
|
|
60,549 |
|
|
|
14,172 |
|
|
|
5,525 |
|
Total liabilities at December 31
(a)
|
|
|
(83,672 |
) |
|
|
(45,191 |
) |
|
|
(12,223 |
) |
|
|
(41,826 |
) |
|
|
(7,903 |
) |
|
|
23,471 |
|
Tangible fixed assets at December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
157,499 |
|
|
|
93,333 |
|
|
|
2,843 |
|
|
|
47,689 |
|
|
|
12,010 |
|
|
|
1,624 |
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(79,136 |
) |
|
|
(47,076 |
) |
|
|
(763 |
) |
|
|
(23,926 |
) |
|
|
(6,711 |
) |
|
|
(660 |
) |
Goodwill at December 31
|
|
|
2,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
1,989 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
Investments in associated companies at December 31
|
|
|
17,945 |
|
|
|
3,591 |
|
|
|
4,679 |
|
|
|
5,344 |
|
|
|
4,154 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
Capital expenditure, acquisitions and new investments in
associated companies
|
|
|
23,651 |
|
|
|
13,154 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
7,968 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortisation charge from
continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
8,340 |
|
|
|
5,603 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
2,160 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Deferred taxation as at December 31, 2002 is included on a
net liability basis, rather than as separate deferred taxation
assets and liabilities as in 2004 and 2003. |
As a consequence of the separate reporting of income from
discontinued operations (see Note 3), information for
comparative periods has been reclassified where necessary.
F-42
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
25 |
Oil and gas exploration and production activities |
The aggregate amount of tangible fixed assets of Shell Group
companies relating to oil and gas exploration and production
activities and the aggregate amount of the related depreciation,
depletion and amortisation at December 31 are shown in the
table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved properties
|
|
|
104,479 |
(a) |
|
|
94,069 |
(a) |
|
|
83,964 |
|
Unproved properties
|
|
|
4,281 |
|
|
|
5,400 |
|
|
|
4,768 |
|
Support equipment and facilities
|
|
|
3,266 |
|
|
|
3,128 |
|
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,026 |
|
|
|
102,597 |
|
|
|
91,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved properties
|
|
|
60,101 |
(a) |
|
|
53,867 |
(a) |
|
|
45,525 |
|
Unproved properties
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
Support equipment and facilities
|
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
1,443 |
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,120 |
|
|
|
56,134 |
|
|
|
47,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net capitalised costs
|
|
|
48,906 |
|
|
|
46,463 |
|
|
|
44,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil sands: net capitalised costs
|
|
|
3,087 |
|
|
|
2,811 |
|
|
|
2,246 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes capitalised asset retirement costs. |
The Shell Group share of associated companies net
capitalised costs was $3,958 million at December 31,
2004 (2003: $3,772 million; 2002: $3,173 million).
Costs incurred by Shell Group companies during the year in oil
and gas property acquisition, exploration and development
activities, whether capitalised or charged to income currently,
are shown in the table overleaf. Development costs exclude costs
of acquiring support equipment and facilities, but include
depreciation thereon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Western | |
|
|
|
|
Eastern Hemisphere | |
|
Hemisphere | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle East, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia | |
|
Russia, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe | |
|
Africa | |
|
Pacific | |
|
CIS(a) | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Acquisition of properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
208 |
|
|
Unproved
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
Exploration
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
1,248 |
|
Development(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding oil sands
|
|
|
2,404 |
|
|
|
1,831 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
2,645 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
8,472 |
|
|
Oil sands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
F-43
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Western | |
|
|
|
|
Eastern Hemisphere | |
|
Hemisphere | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle East, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia | |
|
Russia, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe | |
|
Africa | |
|
Pacific | |
|
CIS(a) | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Acquisition of properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
Unproved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
Exploration
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
1,259 |
|
Development(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding oil sands
|
|
|
2,776 |
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
8,185 |
|
|
Oil sands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Western | |
|
|
|
|
Eastern Hemisphere | |
|
Hemisphere | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle East, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia | |
|
Russia, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe | |
|
Africa | |
|
Pacific | |
|
CIS | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Acquisition of properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
3,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
5,264 |
|
|
Unproved
|
|
|
1,693 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
2,529 |
|
Exploration
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
1,291 |
|
Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding oil sands
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
5,974 |
|
|
Oil sands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
These amounts do not include Sakhalin II project costs in
2004 of $869 million (2003: $384 million) reported in
the Gas & Power segment. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes capitalised asset retirement costs. |
The Shell Group share of associated companies cost
incurred was $415 million in 2004
(2003: $417 million; 2002: $551 million).
F-44
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Earnings of Shell Group companies from exploration and
production activities are given in the table below. For the
purpose of this note, certain purchases of traded product are
netted into sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Western | |
|
|
|
|
Eastern Hemisphere | |
|
Hemisphere | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle East, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia | |
|
Russia, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe | |
|
Africa | |
|
Pacific | |
|
CIS | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third parties
|
|
|
5,856 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
1,045 |
|
|
|
1,806 |
|
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
|
1,277 |
|
|
|
12,213 |
|
|
Intra-group
|
|
|
7,223 |
|
|
|
5,616 |
|
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
4,616 |
|
|
|
4,755 |
|
|
|
1,187 |
|
|
|
24,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds
|
|
|
13,079 |
|
|
|
5,753 |
|
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
6,422 |
|
|
|
6,847 |
|
|
|
2,464 |
|
|
|
37,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
costs(a)
|
|
|
1,895 |
|
|
|
1,548 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
1,687 |
|
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
6,964 |
|
Exploration expense
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
1,171 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortisation
|
|
|
3,764 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
1,622 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
|
|
8,262 |
|
Other income/(costs)
|
|
|
(1,308 |
) |
|
|
(353 |
) |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
(517 |
) |
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(2,572 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before taxation
|
|
|
5,911 |
|
|
|
2,995 |
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
3,318 |
|
|
|
3,742 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
18,158 |
|
Taxation
|
|
|
3,559 |
|
|
|
2,448 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
2,795 |
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
10,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations
|
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
2,444 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
7,522 |
|
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
1,359 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
2,444 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
7,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from oil sands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
F-45
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Western | |
|
|
|
|
Eastern Hemisphere | |
|
Hemisphere | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle East, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia | |
|
Russia, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe | |
|
Africa | |
|
Pacific | |
|
CIS | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third parties
|
|
|
5,386 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
|
1,903 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
10,981 |
|
|
Intra-group
|
|
|
5,873 |
|
|
|
3,888 |
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
|
3,713 |
|
|
|
4,480 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
19,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds
|
|
|
11,259 |
|
|
|
4,017 |
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
5,353 |
|
|
|
6,383 |
|
|
|
1,828 |
|
|
|
30,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
costs(a)
|
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
5,769 |
|
Exploration expense
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
1,116 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortisation
|
|
|
3,723 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
1,667 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
7,657 |
|
Other income/(costs)
|
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
(443 |
) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
(1,114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before taxation
|
|
|
4,909 |
|
|
|
2,046 |
|
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
|
2,796 |
|
|
|
3,868 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
15,171 |
|
Taxation
|
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
2,239 |
|
|
|
1,497 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
7,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations
|
|
|
3,223 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
7,891 |
|
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
|
3,223 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
7,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from oil sands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Western | |
|
|
|
|
Eastern Hemisphere | |
|
Hemisphere | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle East, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia | |
|
Russia, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe | |
|
Africa | |
|
Pacific | |
|
CIS | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third parties
|
|
|
5,472 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
1,997 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
10,969 |
|
|
Intra-group
|
|
|
4,572 |
|
|
|
2,538 |
|
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
3,087 |
|
|
|
2,863 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
14,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds
|
|
|
10,044 |
|
|
|
2,611 |
|
|
|
1,949 |
|
|
|
4,859 |
|
|
|
4,860 |
|
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
25,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
costs(a)
|
|
|
1,826 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
5,162 |
|
Exploration expense
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortisation
|
|
|
2,469 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
6,002 |
|
Other income/(costs)
|
|
|
(428 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
(654 |
) |
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
(1,459 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before taxation
|
|
|
5,144 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
2,072 |
|
|
|
2,340 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
12,048 |
|
Taxation
|
|
|
2,340 |
|
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
1,638 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
5,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations
|
|
|
2,804 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
1,549 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
6,103 |
|
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations
|
|
|
2,804 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
1,549 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
6,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from oil sands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes certain royalties paid in cash amounting to
$2,019 million in 2004 (2003: $1,700 million; 2002:
$1,449 million). |
F-46
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Shell Group share of associated companies earnings was
$1,145 million in 2004 (2003: $800 million; 2002:
$541 million) mainly in the USA $603 million
(2003: $424 million; 2002: $330 million) and Asia
Pacific $522 million (2003: $353 million; 2002:
$170 million).
|
|
26 |
Auditors remuneration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remuneration of KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Audit fees
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Audit-related
fees(a)
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Tax
fees(b)
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Fees for all other non-audit services
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Fees for audit-related services such as employee benefit plan
audits, due diligence assistance, assurance of non-financial
data, operational audits, training services and special
investigations. |
|
(b) |
|
Fees for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning services. |
|
|
27 |
Contingencies and litigation |
Contingent liabilities of Shell Group companies arising from
guarantees related to commitments of non-combined entities
amounted to $2.9 billion at December 31, 2004 (2003:
$3.4 billion). An analysis of the guarantees outstanding at
December 31, 2004 is given in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ billion | |
|
|
| |
In respect of debt
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
In respect of customs duties
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Other
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
The $1.7 billion of guarantees in respect of debt relate to
project finance. Guarantees in respect of customs duties mainly
relate to a cross guarantee, renewable annually, for amounts
payable by industry participants in a western European country.
Shell Oil Company (including subsidiaries and affiliates,
referred to collectively as SOC), along with numerous other
defendants, has been sued by public and quasi-public water
purveyors, as well as governmental entities, alleging
responsibility for groundwater contamination caused by releases
of gasoline containing oxygenate additives. Most of these suits
assert various theories of liability, including product
liability, and seek to recover actual damages, including
clean-up costs. Some assert claims for punitive damages. As of
December 31, 2004, there were approximately 66 pending
suits by such plaintiffs that asserted claims against SOC and
many other defendants (including major energy and refining
companies). Although a majority of these cases do not specify
the amount of monetary damages sought, some include specific
damage claims collectively against all defendants. While the
aggregate amounts claimed against all defendants for actual and
punitive damages in such suits could be material to the
financial statements if they were ultimately recovered against
SOC alone rather than apportioned among the defendants,
management of the Shell Group considers the amounts claimed in
these pleadings to be highly speculative and not an appropriate
basis on which to determine a reasonable estimate of the amount
of the loss that may be ultimately incurred, for the reasons
described below.
The reasons for this determination can be summarised as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
While the majority of the cases have been consolidated for
pre-trial proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York, there are many cases pending in
other jurisdictions throughout the U.S. Most of the cases are at
a preliminary stage. In many matters, little discovery has been
taken and the |
F-47
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
courts have yet to rule upon motions on substantive legal
issues. Consequently, management of the Shell Group does not
have sufficient information to assess the facts underlying the
plaintiffs claims; the nature and extent of damages
claimed, if any; the reasonableness of any specific claim for
money damages; the allocation of potential responsibility among
defendants; or the law that may be applicable. Additionally,
given the pendency of cases in varying jurisdictions, there may
be inconsistencies in the determinations made in these matters. |
|
|
|
There are significant unresolved legal questions relating to
claims asserted in this litigation. For example, it has not been
established whether the use of oxygenates mandated by the 1990
amendments to the Clean Air Act can give rise to a products
liability based claim. While some trial courts have held that it
cannot, other courts have left the question open or declined to
dismiss claims brought on a products liability theory. Other
examples of unresolved legal questions relate to the
applicability of federal preemption, whether a plaintiff may
recover damages for alleged levels of contamination
significantly below state environmental standards, and whether a
plaintiff may recover for an alleged threat to groundwater
before detection of contamination. |
|
|
|
There are also significant unresolved legal questions relating
to whether punitive damages are available for products liability
claims or, if available, the manner in which they might be
determined. For example, some courts have held that for certain
types of product liability claims, punitive damages are not
available. It is not known whether that rule of law would be
applied in some or all of the pending oxygenate additive cases.
Where specific claims for damages have been made, punitive
damages represent in most cases a majority of the total amounts
claimed. |
|
|
|
There are significant issues relating to the allocation of any
liability among the defendants. Virtually all of the oxygenate
additives cases involve multiple defendants including most of
the major participants in the retail gasoline marketing business
in the regions involved in the pending cases. The basis on which
any potential liability may be apportioned among the defendants
in any particular pending case cannot yet be determined. |
For these reasons, management of the Shell Group is not
currently able to estimate a range of reasonably possible losses
or minimum loss for this litigation; however, management of the
Shell Group does not currently believe that the outcome of the
oxygenate-related litigation pending as of December 31,
2004 will have a material impact on the Shell Groups
financial condition, although such resolutions could have a
significant effect on periodic results for the period in which
they are recognised.
A $490 million judgment in favour of 466 plaintiffs in a
consolidated matter that had once been nine individual cases was
rendered in 2002 by a Nicaraguan court jointly against SOC and
three other named defendants (not affiliated with SOC), based
upon Nicaraguan Special Law 364 for claimed personal injuries
resulting from alleged exposure to dibromochloropropane (DBCP)
a pesticide manufactured by SOC prior to 1978. This
special law imposes strict liability (in a predetermined amount)
on international manufacturers of DBCP. The statute also
provides that unless a deposit (calculated as described below)
of an amount denominated in Nicaraguan cordobas is made into the
Nicaraguan courts, the claims would be submitted to the US
courts. In SOCs case the deposit would have been between
$19 million and $20 million (based on an exchange rate
between 15 and 16 cordobas per US dollar). SOC chose not to make
this deposit. The Nicaraguan courts did not, however, give
effect to the provision of Special Law 364 that requires
submission of the matter to the US courts. Instead, the
Nicaraguan court entered judgment against SOC and the other
defendants. Further, SOC was not afforded the opportunity to
present any defences in the Nicaraguan court, including that it
was not subject to Nicaraguan jurisdiction because it had
neither shipped nor sold DBCP to parties in Nicaragua. At this
time, SOC has not completed the steps necessary to perfect an
appeal in Nicaragua and, as described below, the Nicaraguan
claimants have sought to enforce the Nicaraguan judgment against
SOC in the U.S. and in Venezuela. SOC does not have any assets
in Nicaragua. In 2003, an attempt by the plaintiffs to enforce
the Nicaraguan judgment described above in the United States
against Shell Chemical Company and purported affiliates of the
other named defendants was rejected by the U.S. District Court
for the Central District of California, which decision is on
F-48
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
appeal before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Enforcement of
the Nicaraguan judgment was rejected because of improper service
and attempted enforcement against non-existent entities or
entities that were not named in the Nicaraguan judgment.
Thereafter, SOC filed a declaratory judgment action seeking
ultimate adjudication of the non-enforceability of this
Nicaraguan judgment in the U.S. District Court for the Central
District of California. This district court denied motions filed
by the Nicaraguan claimants to dismiss SOC claims that Nicaragua
does not have impartial tribunals, the proceedings violated due
process, the relationship between SOC and Nicaragua made the
exercise of personal jurisdiction unreasonable, and Special Law
364 is repugnant to U.S. public policy because it violates due
process. A finding in favour of SOC on any of these grounds will
result in a refusal to recognize and enforce the judgment in the
United States. Several requests for Exequatur were filed in 2004
with the Tribunal Suprema de Justicia (the Venezuelan Supreme
Court) to enforce Nicaraguan judgments. The petitions imply that
judgments can be satisfied with assets of Shell Venezuela, S.A.,
which was neither a party to the Nicaraguan judgment nor a
subsidiary of SOC, against whom the Exequatur was filed. The
petitions are pending before the Tribunal Suprema de Justicia
but have not been accepted. As of December 31, 2004, five
additional Nicaraguan judgments had been entered in the
collective amount of approximately $226.5 million in favor
of 240 plaintiffs jointly against Shell Chemical Company and
three other named defendants (not affiliated with Shell Chemical
Company) under facts and circumstances almost identical to those
relating to the judgment described above. Additional judgments
are anticipated (including a suit seeking more than
$3 billion). It is the opinion of management of the Group
that the above judgments are unenforceable in a U.S. court, as a
matter of law, for the reasons set out in SOCs declaratory
judgment action described above. No financial provisions have
been established for these judgments or related claims.
Since 1984, SOC has been named with others as a defendant in
numerous product liability cases, including class actions,
involving the failure of residential plumbing systems and
municipal water distribution systems constructed with
polybutylene plastic pipe. SOC fabricated the resin for this
pipe while the co-defendants fabricated the raw materials for
the pipe fittings. As a result of two class action settlements
in 1995, SOC and the co-defendants agreed on a mechanism to fund
until 2009 the settlement of most of the residential plumbing
claims in the United States. Financial provisions have been
taken by SOC for its settlement funding needs anticipated at
this time. Additionally, claims that are not part of these class
action settlements or that challenge these settlements continue
to be filed primarily involving alleged problems with
polybutylene pipe used in municipal water distribution systems.
It is the opinion of management of the Shell Group that exposure
from this other polybutylene litigation pending as of
December 31, 2004, is not material. Management of the Shell
Group cannot currently predict when or how all polybutylene
matters will be finally resolved.
In connection with the recategorisation of certain hydrocarbon
reserves that occurred in 2004, a number of putative shareholder
class actions were filed against Royal Dutch, Shell Transport,
Managing Directors of Royal Dutch during the class period,
Managing Directors of Shell Transport during the class period
and the external auditors for Royal Dutch, Shell Transport and
the Royal Dutch/Shell Group. These actions were consolidated in
the United States District Court in New Jersey and a
consolidated complaint was filed in September 2004. The parties
are awaiting a decision with respect to defendants motions
to dismiss asserting lack of jurisdiction with respect to the
claims of non-United States shareholders who purchased on
non-United States securities exchanges and failure to state a
claim. Merits discovery has not begun. The case is at an early
stage and subject to substantial uncertainties concerning the
outcome of the material factual and legal issues relating to the
litigation, including the pending motions to dismiss on lack of
jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. In addition,
potential damages, if any, in a fully litigated securities class
action would depend on the losses caused by the alleged wrongful
conduct that would be demonstrated by individual class members
in their purchases and sales of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport
Ordinary Shares during the relevant class period. Accordingly,
based on the current status of the litigation, management of the
Shell Group is unable to estimate a range of possible losses or
any minimum loss. Management of the Shell Group will review this
determination as the litigation progresses.
Also in connection with the hydrocarbon reserves
recategorisation, putative shareholder class actions were filed
on behalf of participants in various Shell Oil Company qualified
plans alleging that Royal Dutch, Shell Transport and various
current and former officers and directors breached various
fiduciary duties to employee
F-49
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
participants imposed by the Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (ERISA). These suits were consolidated in the United
States District Court in New Jersey and a consolidated class
action complaint was filed in July 2004. Defendants
motions to dismiss have been fully briefed. Some document
discovery has taken place. The case is at an early stage and
subject to substantial uncertainties concerning the outcome of
the material factual and legal issues relating to the
litigation, including the pending motion to dismiss and the
legal uncertainties with respect to the methodology for
calculating damage, if any, should defendants become subject to
an adverse judgment. The Shell Group is in settlement
discussions with counsel for plaintiffs, which it hopes will
lead to a successful resolution of the case without the need for
further litigation. No financial provisions have been taken with
respect to the ERISA litigation.
The reserves recategorisation also led to the filing of
shareholder derivative actions in June 2004. The four suits
pending in New York state court, New York federal court and New
Jersey federal court demand Shell Group management and
structural changes and seek unspecified damages from current and
former members of the Boards of Directors of Royal Dutch and
Shell Transport. The suits are in preliminary stages and no
responses are yet due from defendants. Because any money
damages in the derivative actions would be paid to
Royal Dutch and Shell Transport, management of the Shell Group
does not believe that the resolution of these suits will have a
material adverse effect on the Shell Groups financial
condition or operating results.
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and
UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) issued formal orders of
private investigation in relation to the reserves
recategorisation which Royal Dutch and Shell Transport resolved
by reaching agreements with the SEC and the FSA. In connection
with the agreement with the SEC, Royal Dutch and Shell Transport
consented, without admitting or denying the SECs findings
or conclusions, to an administrative order finding that Royal
Dutch and Shell Transport violated, and requiring Royal Dutch
and Shell Transport to cease and desist from future violations
of, the antifraud, reporting, recordkeeping and internal control
provisions of the US Federal securities laws and related SEC
rules, agreed to pay a $120 million civil penalty and has
undertaken to spend an additional $5 million developing a
comprehensive internal compliance program. In connection with
the agreement with the FSA, Royal Dutch and Shell Transport
agreed, without admitting or denying the FSAs findings or
conclusions, to the entry of a Final Notice by the FSA finding
that Royal Dutch and Shell Transport breached market abuse
provisions of the UKs Financial Services and Markets Act
2000 and the Listing Rules made under it and agreed to pay a
penalty of £17 million. The penalties from the SEC and
FSA and the additional amount to develop a comprehensive
internal compliance program have been paid by Shell Group
companies and fully included in the Income Statement of the
Shell Group. The United States Department of Justice has
commenced a criminal investigation, and Euronext Amsterdam, the
Dutch Authority Financial Markets and the California Department
of Corporations are investigating the issues related to the
reserves recategorisation. Management of the Shell Group cannot
currently predict the manner and timing of the resolution of
these pending matters and is currently unable to estimate the
range of reasonably possible losses from such matters.
Shell Group companies are subject to a number of other loss
contingencies arising out of litigation and claims brought by
governmental and private parties, which are handled in the
ordinary course of business.
The operations and earnings of Shell Group companies continue,
from time to time, to be affected to varying degrees by
political, legislative, fiscal and regulatory developments,
including those relating to the protection of the environment
and indigenous people, in the countries in which they operate.
The industries in which Shell Group companies are engaged are
also subject to physical risks of various types. The nature and
frequency of these developments and events, not all of which are
covered by insurance, as well as their effect on future
operations and earnings, are unpredictable.
28 Financial instruments
Shell Group companies, in the normal course of business, use
various types of financial instruments which expose the Shell
Group to market or credit risk. Shell Group companies have
procedures and policies in place to limit the amount of credit
exposure to any counterparty or market. These procedures and the
broad geographical
F-50
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
spread of Shell Group companies activities limit the Shell
Groups exposure to concentrations of credit or market risk.
Some Shell Group companies enter into derivatives such as
interest rate swaps/ forward rate agreements to manage interest
rate exposure. The financing of most Operating Companies is
structured on a floating-rate basis and, except in special
cases, further interest rate risk management is discouraged.
Foreign exchange derivatives, such as forward exchange contracts
and currency swaps/ options, are used by some Shell Group
companies to manage foreign exchange risk. Commodity swaps,
options and futures are used to manage price and timing risks
mainly involving crude oil, natural gas and oil products.
The contract/notional amount, together with the estimated fair
value (carrying amount) of derivatives held by Shell Group
companies at December 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Contract/ | |
|
|
|
Contract/ | |
|
|
|
|
notional | |
|
Estimated | |
|
notional | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Interest rate swaps/forward rate agreements
|
|
|
4,307 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
4,322 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
Forward exchange contracts and currency swaps/options
|
|
|
18,830 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
18,874 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
Commodity swaps, options and futures
|
|
|
101,021 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
65,800 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,158 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
88,996 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The contract/national amounts of commodity swaps, options and
futures have increased during the year as a consequence of
rising crude oil and natural gas prices.
Other financial instruments in the Balance Sheet include fixed
assets: investments securities, trade receivables,
short-term securities, cash and cash equivalents, short and
long-term debt, and assets and liabilities in respect of risk
management activities. The estimated fair values of these
instruments approximate their carrying amounts.
F-51
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION OIL AND GAS
(UNAUDITED)
Reserves
Net quantities (which are
unaudited)1
of proved oil and gas reserves are shown in the tables on
pages F-53 through F-55. Proved reserves are the estimated
quantities of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids
which geological and engineering data demonstrate with
reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from
known reservoirs under existing economic and operating
conditions, i.e., prices and costs as of the date the
estimate is made. Proved developed oil and gas reserves are
reserves that can be expected to be recovered through existing
wells with existing equipment and operating methods. The
unaudited reserve volumes reported exclude volumes attributable
to oil and gas discoveries which are not at present considered
proved. Such volumes will be included when technical, fiscal and
other conditions allow them to be economically developed and
produced.
Proved reserves are shown net of any quantities of crude oil or
natural gas that are expected to be taken by others as royalties
in kind but do not exclude quantities related to royalties
expected to be paid in cash (except in North America and in
other situations in which the royalty quantities are owned by
others) or those related to fixed margin contracts. Proved
reserves include certain quantities of crude oil or natural gas
which will be produced under arrangements which involve Shell
Group companies in upstream risks and rewards but do not
transfer title of the product to those companies.
Oil and gas reserves cannot be measured exactly since estimation
of reserves involves subjective judgment. These estimates remain
subject to revision and are unaudited supplementary information.
1 Reserves,
reserves volumes and reserves related information and disclosure
are referred to as unaudited as a means to clarify
that this information is not covered by the audit opinion of the
registered independent public accounting firms that have audited
and reported on the Combined Financial Statements of Royal Dutch
Petroleum Company.
F-52
Crude oil and natural gas liquids
Shell Group companies estimated net proved reserves of
crude oil and natural gas liquids at the end of the year, their
share of the net proved reserves of associated companies at the
end of the year, and the changes in such reserves during the
year are set out below.
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Western | |
|
|
|
|
|
Western | |
|
|
|
|
|
Western | |
|
|
|
|
Eastern Hemisphere | |
|
Hemisphere | |
|
|
|
Eastern Hemisphere | |
|
Hemisphere | |
|
|
|
Eastern Hemisphere | |
|
Hemisphere | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East | |
|
Americas | |
|
|
|
|
|
East, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia | |
|
Russia, | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Asia | |
|
Russia, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia | |
|
Russia, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe | |
|
Africa(b) | |
|
Pacific(c) | |
|
CIS(d) | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
Europe | |
|
Africa(b) | |
|
Pacific(c) | |
|
CIS(d) | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
Europe | |
|
Africa(b) | |
|
Pacific(c) | |
|
CIS(d) | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
million barrels(a) | |
|
million barrels | |
|
million barrels | |
Shell Group companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1
|
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
1,202 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
5,009 |
|
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
1,449 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
1,446 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
5,782 |
|
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
Revisions and reclassifications
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
170 |
|
Improved recovery
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
Extensions and discoveries
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212 |
|
Purchases of minerals in place
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
Sales of minerals in place
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
Production
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(713 |
) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(763 |
) |
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(768 |
) |
Transfers to associated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(384 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(384 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
3,761 |
|
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
1,202 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
5,009 |
|
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
1,449 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
1,446 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
5,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shell Group share of associated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
664 |
|
Revisions and reclassifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
Improved recovery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Extensions and discoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
Purchases of minerals in place
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
Sales of minerals in place
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
Transfers from Shell Group companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Interests share of proved reserves of Shell
Group companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
million barrels |
|
million barrels |
|
million barrels |
Oil
sands(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shell Group companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
Revisions and reclassifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
Extensions and discoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Interests share of oil sands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved developed reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shell Group companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
3,269 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
3,516 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
1,089 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
3,387 |
|
At December 31
(f)
|
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
2,338 |
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
3,269 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
3,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shell Group share of associated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
539 |
|
At December 31
(f)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
These quantities have not been adjusted to standard heat content. |
(b) |
|
Excludes Egypt. |
(c) |
|
Excludes Sakhalin. |
(d) |
|
Middle East and Former Soviet Union/Commonwealth of Independent
States. Includes Caspian region, Egypt and Sakhalin. |
(e) |
|
Petroleum reserves from operations that do not qualify as oil
and gas producing activities, such as our Athabasca Oil Sands
Project, are not included in oil and gas reserves and are not
considered in the standardised measure of discounted future cash
flows for oil and gas reserves, which is found on
page F-55. The petroleum reserves for the Athabasca Oil
Sands Project are presented in this report net of royalty
volumes. |
(f) |
|
After accounting for a transfer of proved developed reserves
from Shell Group to associated companies of 360 million
barrels at the end of 2004. |
F-53
Natural gas
Shell Group companies estimated net proved reserves of
natural gas at the end of the year, their share of the net
proved reserves of associated companies at the end of the year,
and the changes in such reserves during the year are set out
below. The volumes set out below have not been adjusted to
standard heat content, which means that volumes of gas are
reported on an as-sold basis and are treated as
equivalent without regard to the quality of the gas (e.g., with
respect to the inert gas content thereof or the various
hydrocarbon components). The price used to calculate future
revenues and cash flows from proved gas reserves is that
realised at year-end based on as-sold volumes. As
such, the realised price reflects the quality of the gas, both
in terms of inert components which reduce gas quality and
hydrocarbon components with high molecular weights which enrich
the quality of the gas.
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Western | |
|
|
|
|
|
Western | |
|
|
|
|
|
Western | |
|
|
|
|
Eastern Hemisphere | |
|
Hemisphere | |
|
|
|
Eastern Hemisphere | |
|
Hemisphere | |
|
|
|
Eastern Hemisphere | |
|
Hemisphere | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East | |
|
Americas | |
|
|
|
|
|
East, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia | |
|
Russia, | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Asia | |
|
Russia, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia | |
|
Russia, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe | |
|
Africa(b) | |
|
Pacific(c) | |
|
CIS(d) | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
Europe | |
|
Africa(b) | |
|
Pacific(c) | |
|
CIS(d) | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
Europe | |
|
Africa(b) | |
|
Pacific(c) | |
|
CIS(d) | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
thousand million standard cubic feet(a) | |
Shell Group companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1
|
|
|
19,876 |
|
|
|
2,743 |
|
|
|
7,352 |
|
|
|
3,628 |
|
|
|
3,143 |
|
|
|
1,628 |
|
|
|
38,370 |
|
|
|
21,284 |
|
|
|
1,692 |
|
|
|
7,862 |
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
|
3,842 |
|
|
|
1,959 |
|
|
|
37,757 |
|
|
|
22,022 |
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
9,031 |
|
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
|
3,663 |
|
|
|
2,257 |
|
|
|
40,530 |
|
Revisions and reclassifications
|
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
(435 |
) |
|
|
(688 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
(1,388 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(680 |
) |
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
(1,032 |
) |
Improved recovery
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176 |
|
Extensions and discoveries
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
2,128 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
2,965 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2,790 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
4,955 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
Purchases of minerals in place
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
893 |
|
Sales of minerals in place
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(653 |
) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(545 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(227 |
) |
Production
|
|
|
(1,345 |
) |
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
(535 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
(2,953 |
) |
|
|
(1,303 |
) |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(541 |
) |
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
(555 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
(2,982 |
) |
|
|
(1,331 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
(553 |
) |
|
|
(377 |
) |
|
|
(611 |
) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(3,157 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
18,439 |
|
|
|
2,532 |
|
|
|
6,803 |
|
|
|
5,383 |
|
|
|
2,823 |
|
|
|
1,545 |
|
|
|
37,525 |
|
|
|
19,876 |
|
|
|
2,743 |
|
|
|
7,352 |
|
|
|
3,628 |
|
|
|
3,143 |
|
|
|
1,628 |
|
|
|
38,370 |
|
|
|
21,284 |
|
|
|
1,692 |
|
|
|
7,862 |
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
|
3,842 |
|
|
|
1,959 |
|
|
|
37,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shell Group share of associated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,308 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,006 |
|
Revisions and reclassifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
442 |
|
Improved recovery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Extensions and discoveries
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
Purchases of minerals in place
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of minerals in place
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,041 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Interests share of proved reserves of Shell
Group companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
2,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
2,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved developed reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shell Group companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1
|
|
|
11,477 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
3,128 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
1,754 |
|
|
|
1,297 |
|
|
|
18,988 |
|
|
|
11,472 |
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
3,405 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
2,311 |
|
|
|
1,464 |
|
|
|
19,961 |
|
|
|
11,880 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
3,635 |
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
2,363 |
|
|
|
1,754 |
|
|
|
21,397 |
|
At December 31
|
|
|
12,961 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
2,702 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
19,703 |
|
|
|
11,477 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
3,128 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
1,754 |
|
|
|
1,297 |
|
|
|
18,988 |
|
|
|
11,472 |
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
3,405 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
2,311 |
|
|
|
1,464 |
|
|
|
19,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shell Group share of associated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,881 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,831 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
At December 31
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,649 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,881 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
These quantities have not been adjusted to standard heat content. |
(b) |
|
Excludes Egypt. |
(c) |
|
Excludes Sakhalin. |
(d) |
|
Middle East and Former Soviet Union/Commonwealth of Independent
States. Includes Caspian region, Egypt and Sakhalin. |
F-54
Standardised measure of discounted future cash flows
United States accounting principles require the disclosure of a
standardised measure of discounted future cash flows, relating
to proved oil and gas reserve quantities and based on prices and
costs at the end of each year, currently enacted tax rates and a
10% annual discount factor. The information so calculated does
not provide a reliable measure of future cash flows from proved
reserves, nor does it permit a realistic comparison to be made
of one entity with another because the assumptions used cannot
reflect the varying circumstances within each entity. In
addition a substantial but unknown proportion of future real
cash flows from oil and gas production activities is expected to
derive from reserves which have already been discovered, but
which cannot yet be regarded as proved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Western | |
|
|
|
|
|
Western | |
|
|
|
|
|
Western | |
|
|
|
|
Eastern Hemisphere | |
|
Hemisphere | |
|
|
|
Eastern Hemisphere | |
|
Hemisphere | |
|
|
|
Eastern Hemisphere | |
|
Hemisphere | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia | |
|
Russia, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia | |
|
Russia, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia | |
|
Russia, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe | |
|
Africa(b) | |
|
Pacific(c) | |
|
CIS(d) | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
Europe | |
|
Africa(b) | |
|
Pacific(c) | |
|
CIS(d) | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
Europe | |
|
Africa(b) | |
|
Pacific(c) | |
|
CIS(d) | |
|
USA | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Shell Group companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future cash inflows
|
|
|
107,956 |
|
|
|
47,326 |
|
|
|
26,461 |
|
|
|
51,565 |
|
|
|
33,525 |
|
|
|
12,578 |
|
|
|
279,411 |
|
|
|
108,836 |
|
|
|
36,965 |
|
|
|
21,695 |
|
|
|
42,627 |
|
|
|
31,203 |
|
|
|
14,710 |
|
|
|
256,036 |
|
|
|
98,126 |
|
|
|
36,427 |
|
|
|
22,243 |
|
|
|
36,513 |
|
|
|
32,541 |
|
|
|
16,280 |
|
|
|
242,130 |
|
Future production costs
|
|
|
29,641 |
|
|
|
13,354 |
|
|
|
4,882 |
|
|
|
10,020 |
|
|
|
5,354 |
|
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
66,851 |
|
|
|
20,241 |
|
|
|
6,347 |
|
|
|
4,365 |
|
|
|
7,579 |
|
|
|
4,949 |
|
|
|
4,156 |
|
|
|
47,637 |
|
|
|
18,721 |
|
|
|
5,034 |
|
|
|
3,563 |
|
|
|
5,174 |
|
|
|
4,841 |
|
|
|
3,673 |
|
|
|
41,006 |
|
Future development costs
|
|
|
11,778 |
|
|
|
4,928 |
|
|
|
3,669 |
|
|
|
10,216 |
|
|
|
1,841 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
33,266 |
|
|
|
6,541 |
|
|
|
4,661 |
|
|
|
2,528 |
|
|
|
9,679 |
|
|
|
3,085 |
|
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
27,809 |
|
|
|
4,783 |
|
|
|
4,670 |
|
|
|
2,397 |
|
|
|
2,844 |
|
|
|
3,201 |
|
|
|
1,532 |
|
|
|
19,427 |
|
Future tax expenses
|
|
|
34,635 |
|
|
|
16,831 |
|
|
|
6,147 |
|
|
|
14,031 |
|
|
|
9,860 |
|
|
|
2,074 |
|
|
|
83,578 |
|
|
|
39,605 |
|
|
|
16,396 |
|
|
|
4,076 |
|
|
|
15,309 |
|
|
|
8,467 |
|
|
|
2,469 |
|
|
|
86,322 |
|
|
|
32,125 |
|
|
|
18,690 |
|
|
|
4,538 |
|
|
|
17,443 |
|
|
|
9,103 |
|
|
|
3,447 |
|
|
|
85,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future net cash flows
|
|
|
31,902 |
|
|
|
12,213 |
|
|
|
11,763 |
|
|
|
17,298 |
|
|
|
16,470 |
|
|
|
6,070 |
|
|
|
95,716 |
|
|
|
42,449 |
|
|
|
9,561 |
|
|
|
10,726 |
|
|
|
10,060 |
|
|
|
14,702 |
|
|
|
6,770 |
|
|
|
94,268 |
|
|
|
42,497 |
|
|
|
8,033 |
|
|
|
11,745 |
|
|
|
11,052 |
|
|
|
15,396 |
|
|
|
7,628 |
|
|
|
96,351 |
|
Effect of discounting cash flows at 10%
|
|
|
14,925 |
|
|
|
4,037 |
|
|
|
5,270 |
|
|
|
11,375 |
|
|
|
5,803 |
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
43,417 |
|
|
|
21,126 |
|
|
|
4,210 |
|
|
|
4,590 |
|
|
|
8,491 |
|
|
|
5,170 |
|
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
|
46,096 |
|
|
|
19,511 |
|
|
|
3,601 |
|
|
|
5,343 |
|
|
|
4,166 |
|
|
|
5,427 |
|
|
|
3,143 |
|
|
|
41,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardised measure of discounted future net cash flows
|
|
|
16,977 |
|
|
|
8,176 |
|
|
|
6,493 |
|
|
|
5,923 |
|
|
|
10,667 |
|
|
|
4,063 |
|
|
|
52,299 |
|
|
|
21,323 |
|
|
|
5,351 |
|
|
|
6,136 |
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
9,532 |
|
|
|
4,261 |
|
|
|
48,172 |
|
|
|
22,986 |
|
|
|
4,432 |
|
|
|
6,402 |
|
|
|
6,886 |
|
|
|
9,969 |
|
|
|
4,485 |
|
|
|
55,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shell Group share of associated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
2,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(1,186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
(473 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in standardised measure of Shell Group companies
discounted future net cash flows relating to proved Oil and Gas
Reserves(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
At January 1
|
|
|
48,172 |
|
|
|
55,160 |
|
|
|
37,910 |
|
Net changes in prices and production costs
|
|
|
23,524 |
|
|
|
12,178 |
|
|
|
34,592 |
|
Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery
|
|
|
6,223 |
|
|
|
9,255 |
|
|
|
5,177 |
|
Purchases and sales of minerals in place
|
|
|
(564 |
) |
|
|
(2,558 |
) |
|
|
7,319 |
|
Revisions of previous reserve estimates
|
|
|
(385 |
) |
|
|
(4,103 |
) |
|
|
375 |
|
Development cost related to future production
|
|
|
(6,829 |
) |
|
|
(14,291 |
) |
|
|
(6,168 |
) |
Sales and transfers of oil and gas, net of production
costs(e)
|
|
|
(27,530 |
) |
|
|
(24,892 |
) |
|
|
(20,387 |
) |
Development cost incurred during the year
|
|
|
9,386 |
|
|
|
8,205 |
|
|
|
6,503 |
|
Accretion of discount
|
|
|
7,947 |
|
|
|
9,051 |
|
|
|
6,053 |
|
Net change in income tax
|
|
|
(7,645 |
) |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
(16,214 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
52,299 |
|
|
|
48,172 |
|
|
|
55,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The weighted average year-end spot oil price in 2004 was
$37.61/bbl ($26.52/bbl in 2003, $24.49/bbl in 2002) and the
weighted average year-end spot gas price in 2004 was $21.27/boe
($18.03/boe in 2003, $15.75/boe in 2002). |
|
(b) |
|
Excludes Egypt. |
|
(c) |
|
Excludes Sakhalin. |
|
(d) |
|
Middle East and Former Soviet Union / Commonwealth of
Independent States. Includes Caspian region, Egypt and Sakhalin. |
|
(e) |
|
Includes a transfer of proved developed reserves from Shell
Group to associated companies of 360 million barrels in
2004 ($260 million). |
F-55
Additional information concerning proved reserves
Proved reserves can be either developed or undeveloped. Shell
Group proved reserves at December 31, 2004 were divided
into 58% developed and 42% undeveloped on a barrel of oil
equivalent basis.
Proved reserves are recognised under various forms of
contractual agreements. Shell Group proved reserves volumes
present in agreements such as Production Sharing Contracts or
other forms of economic entitlement contracts where Shell Group
share of reserves can vary with actual year-end price are
approximately 859 million barrels of crude oil and natural
gas liquids and 9,720 thousand million standard cubic feet
of gas.
F-56
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION DERIVATIVES AND OTHER
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND DERIVATIVE COMMODITY INSTRUMENTS
The following information is provided in accordance with the
Securities and Exchange Commission rules issued in 1997. The
contract/ notional amounts of the derivative instruments
outstanding give an indication of the extent of the use of these
instruments but not of the exposure to credit or market risk.
Variable interest rates stated are spot rates applying as at
December 31. Amounts denominated in non-US dollar
currencies have been translated using spot exchange rates at
December 31. Associated companies data are excluded.
|
|
|
Debt securities held for trading purposes |
There were no debt securities held for trading purposes by Shell
Group companies at December 31, 2004, or at
December 31, 2003.
|
|
|
Debt securities held for purposes other than
trading |
The following two tables give details of debt securities held
for purposes other than trading by Shell Group companies at
December 31, 2004 and 2003 respectively, at estimated fair
value, by year of maturity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 | |
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
and after | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate US dollar debt securities
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
average Interest rate
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Variable rate US dollar debt securities
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
average Interest rate
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate euro debt securities
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
average Interest rate
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate UK pound debt securities
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
average Interest rate
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Variable rate UK pound debt securities
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
average Interest rate
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate Canadian dollar debt securities
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
average Interest rate
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Other fixed rate debt securities
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
average Interest rate
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Other variable rate debt securities
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
average Interest rate
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,519 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
2,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 | |
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
and after | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate US dollar debt securities
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
average Interest rate
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Variable rate US dollar debt securities
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Average Interest rate
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate euro debt securities
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
average Interest rate
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate UK pound debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
average Interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate Canadian dollar debt securities
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
average Interest rate
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate Swedish krone debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
average Interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate Danish krone debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
average Interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Other fixed rate debt securities
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
average Interest rate
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other variable rate debt securities
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
average Interest rate
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities held for purposes other than
trading |
At December 31, 2004, Shell Group companies held equity
securities for purposes other than trading amounting to
$5,017 million (2003: $4,982 million). These
principally comprised shares of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport,
amounting to $4,187 million
(2003: $3,428 million), that are held in connection
with share option plans and other incentives compensation plans
and a portfolio amounting to $831 million required to be
held long-term by the Shell Group insurance companies as
security for their insurance activities. The portfolio tracks
the Morgan Stanley World Index and therefore is spread over 20
of the major stock markets according to respective market
capitalisation, including 55% in the USA, 11% in the UK, 9% in
Japan, 4% in France, 3% in Switzerland, 3% in Canada and 3% in
Germany.
F-58
The following two tables give details of debt owed by Shell
Group companies at December 31, 2004 and 2003 respectively,
by year of maturity. Estimated fair value approximates carrying
amount.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 | |
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
and after | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate US dollar debt
|
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
2,073 |
|
|
|
8,240 |
|
|
average interest rate
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Variable rate US dollar debt
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
average interest rate
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate European debt
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2,761 |
|
|
average interest rate
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Variable rate European debt
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
average interest rate
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Other fixed rate debt
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
average interest rate
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Other variable rate debt
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
865 |
|
|
average interest rate
|
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,709 |
|
|
|
1,884 |
|
|
|
2,474 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
2,943 |
|
|
|
13,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 | |
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
and after | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate US dollar debt
|
|
|
5,766 |
|
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
2,709 |
|
|
|
11,117 |
|
|
average interest rate
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Variable rate US dollar debt
|
|
|
1,654 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
2,309 |
|
|
average interest rate
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate European debt
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2,730 |
|
|
average interest rate
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Variable rate European debt
|
|
|
1,173 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,182 |
|
|
average interest rate
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Other fixed rate debt
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
average interest rate
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Other variable rate debt
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
average interest rate
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
10,460 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
1,526 |
|
|
|
2,067 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
3,226 |
|
|
|
19,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate European currency debt expected to mature in 2005
includes $268 million of UK pound debt (with an
average interest rate of 2.8%). The fixed rate European currency
debt expected to mature in 2006 is mainly UK pound debt with an
average interest rate of 4.3%. Fixed rate European currency debt
expected to mature in 2007 includes $1,025 million of Euro
debt with an average interest rate of 3.5% and $297 million
of UK pound debt with an average interest rate of 3.3%. The
fixed rate European currency debt expected to mature in 2008 is
Euro debt with an average interest rate of 3.3%. The fixed rate
European currency debt due to mature after 2010 is Euro debt
with an average interest rate of 4.4%.
F-59
Other fixed rate debt expected to mature in 2005 includes
$101 million of Argentine peso debt at an average interest
rate of 3.3%. Other fixed rate debt due to mature after 2010 is
mainly comprised of $154 million of Malaysian Ringgit debt
(at an average interest rate of 8.0%) and $391 million of
Canadian Dollar debt (at an average interest rate of 6.9%).
Other variable rate debt expected to mature in 2005 includes
$205 million of Philippine peso debt with an average
interest rate of 8.6% and $116 million of Canadian dollar
debt at an average interest rate of 2.5%. Other variable rate
debt expected to mature in 2006 includes $191 million of
Canadian dollar debt at an average interest rate 2.5%.
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps/forward rate agreements |
The following two tables give details of interest rate swaps/
forward rate agreements held by Shell Group companies at
December 31, 2004 and 2003 respectively, by expected year
of maturity. These are held for purposes other than trading. The
variable interest rate component of contracts is generally
linked to inter-bank offer rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 | |
|
Total contract/ | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
and after | |
|
notional amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed to Variable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount
|
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,701 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
average pay rate
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive rate
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable to Fixed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
average pay rate
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive rate
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UK pound
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed to Variable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
average pay rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed to Variable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
average pay rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,307 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 | |
|
Total contract/ | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
and after | |
|
notional amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed to Variable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
2,801 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
average pay rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable to Fixed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
average pay rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
6.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
7.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UK pound
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed to Variable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
average pay rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed to Variable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
average pay rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,065 |
|
|
|
1,269 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
4,322 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-61
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
The following two tables give details of forward exchange
contracts held by Shell Group companies at December 31,
2004 and 2003 respectively. These are held for purposes other
than trading. Contract categories with a contract/notional
amount exceeding $100 million and/or an estimated fair
value exceeding $10 million (gain or loss) are listed
separately.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average contractual | |
|
Contract/notional | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
exchange rate | |
|
amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
$ million | |
2004 (all contracts mature in 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buy euro/sell US dollar
|
|
|
1.34 |
|
|
|
3,919 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
Buy US dollar/sell euro
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
Buy euro/sell UK pound
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
1,836 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Buy UK pound/sell US dollar
|
|
|
1.89 |
|
|
|
1,376 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Buy US dollar/sell Australian dollar
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Buy US dollar/sell Norwegian krone
|
|
|
6.26 |
|
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
Buy Singapore dollar/sell US dollar
|
|
|
0.61 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Buy New Zealand dollar/sell US dollar
|
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Buy Canadian dollar/sell US dollar
|
|
|
0.79 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Buy Norwegian krone/sell US dollar
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Buy US dollar/sell Philippine peso
|
|
|
56.19 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
Buy US dollar/sell Swedish krone
|
|
|
6.61 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
Buy euro/sell Polish zloty
|
|
|
4.10 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
Buy US dollar/sell Hong Kong dollar
|
|
|
7.77 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,176 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,920 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average contractual | |
|
Contract/notional | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
exchange rate | |
|
amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
$ million | |
2003 (all contracts mature in 2004)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buy US dollar/sell UK pound
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
|
2,255 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
Buy US dollar/sell euro
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
|
1,897 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
Buy euro/sell US dollar
|
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
|
2,742 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
Buy UK pound/sell US dollar
|
|
|
1.73 |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Buy euro/sell UK pound
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Buy US dollar/sell Australian dollar
|
|
|
1.36 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Buy Swiss franc/sell US dollar
|
|
|
0.77 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Buy US dollar/sell Norwegian krone
|
|
|
6.67 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Buy Singapore dollar/sell US dollar
|
|
|
0.58 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Buy US dollar/sell Danish krone
|
|
|
5.88 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Buy US dollar/sell Swedish krone
|
|
|
7.14 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Buy Swedish krona/sell US dollar
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Buy euro/sell Norwegian krone
|
|
|
8.33 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Buy US dollar/sell Philippine peso
|
|
|
55.87 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,845 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-62
The following two tables give details of currency swaps
contracts held by Shell Group companies at December 31,
2004 and 2003 respectively, by expected year of maturity. These
are held for purposes other than trading. Contract categories
with a contract/notional amount exceeding $100 million
and/or an estimated fair value exceeding $10 million (gain
or loss) are listed separately.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contractual | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 | |
|
Total contract/ | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
exchange rate | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
and after | |
|
notional amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
$ million | |
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buy UK pound/sell euro
|
|
|
1.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,334 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Buy US dollar/sell Canadian dollar
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,342 |
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
Buy Canadian dollar/sell US dollar
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Buy US dollar/sell Brazilian real
|
|
|
2.85 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
Buy UK pound/sell US dollar
|
|
|
1.74 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Buy US dollar/sell Thai baht
|
|
|
39.94 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Other contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,466 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
1,537 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
4,910 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contractual | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 | |
|
Total contract/ | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
exchange rate | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
and after | |
|
notional amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
$ million | |
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buy UK pound/sell euro
|
|
|
1.54 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,571 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
Buy US dollar/sell Canadian dollar
|
|
|
1.31 |
|
|
|
1,136 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,439 |
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
Buy US dollar/sell euro
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
Buy Australian dollar/sell US dollar
|
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
Buy Canadian dollar/sell US dollar
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Buy US dollar/sell Brazilian real
|
|
|
2.82 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
Buy UK pound/sell US dollar
|
|
|
1.74 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,964 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
1,181 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
6,029 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-63
The tables on this and following pages give details of commodity
swaps, options and futures contracts held by Shell Group
companies at December 31, 2004 and 2003 respectively, by
expected year of maturity. Variable prices are linked to indexed
or dated commodities.
The increases in fair values of commodity swaps, options and
futures between 2003 and 2004 are primarily caused by underlying
increases of commodity prices driven by an increase of crude oil
prices in 2004.
|
|
|
Commodity swaps held for trading purposes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 and | |
|
Total contract/ | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
after | |
|
notional amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Variable price to variable price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ millions)
|
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,806 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
Volume (million barrels m bbl)
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay
|
|
|
42.3 |
|
|
|
41.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive
|
|
|
42.1 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Buy fixed price/sell variable price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ millions)
|
|
|
1,843 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
Volume (million barrels m bbl)
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
32.6 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive
|
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
39.3 |
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Buy variable price/sell fixed price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ millions)
|
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,638 |
|
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
Volume (million barrels m bbl)
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
37.8 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil basis swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Buy variable/sell variable price contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ millions)
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
Volume (million barrels m bbl)
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Sell variable/buy variable price contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ millions)
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (million barrels m bbl)
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil freight swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Buy fixed price/sell variable price contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ millions)
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
Volume (million barrels m bbl)
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 and | |
|
Total contract/ | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
after | |
|
notional amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
(b) Buy variable price/sell fixed price contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ millions)
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Volume (million barrels m bbl)
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil products swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Buy fixed price/sell variable price contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ millions)
|
|
|
3,055 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,161 |
|
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
Volume (million barrels m bbl)
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay
|
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
39.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive
|
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Buy variable price/sell fixed price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ millions)
|
|
|
3,193 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3,362 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
Volume (million barrels m bbl)
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Buy variable/sell variable price contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ millions)
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Volume (million barrels m bbl)
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay
|
|
|
49.3 |
|
|
|
48.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive
|
|
|
49.4 |
|
|
|
48.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil products basis swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Buy variable/sell variable price contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ millions)
|
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
Volume (million barrels m bbl)
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Sell variable/buy variable price contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ millions)
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
Volume (million barrels m bbl)
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Buy fixed price/sell variable price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ millions)
|
|
|
3,268 |
|
|
|
1,296 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
Volume (thousand megawatt hours)
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay
|
|
|
57.0 |
|
|
|
55.0 |
|
|
|
52.4 |
|
|
|
64.3 |
|
|
|
60.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive
|
|
|
55.8 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
|
|
|
56.4 |
|
|
|
65.1 |
|
|
|
56.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Buy variable price/sell fixed price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ millions)
|
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,946 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
Volume (thousand megawatt hours)
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay
|
|
|
56.1 |
|
|
|
56.4 |
|
|
|
57.0 |
|
|
|
60.6 |
|
|
|
57.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
55.3 |
|
|
|
53.3 |
|
|
|
59.6 |
|
|
|
61.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 and | |
|
Total contract/ | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
after | |
|
notional amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Natural gas swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Buy fixed price/sell variable price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ millions)
|
|
|
5,947 |
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,987 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
Volume (thousand million cubic feet bcf)
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Buy variable price/sell fixed price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ millions)
|
|
|
6,267 |
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
8,370 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
Volume (thousand million cubic feet bcf)
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Buy variable price/sell variable price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ millions)
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Volume (thousand million cubic feet bcf)
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas basis swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Buy variable price/sell variable price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ millions)
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
Volume (thousand million cubic feet bcf)
|
|
|
903 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Sell variable price/buy variable price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ millions)
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
Volume (thousand million cubic feet bcf)
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,433 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contract/ | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
notional amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Variable price to variable price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
2,671 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,684 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Volume (million barrels m bbl)
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/bbl)
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive ($/bbl)
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Buy fixed price/sell variable price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
1,452 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,787 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
Volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/bbl)
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive ($/bbl)
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Buy variable price/sell fixed price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
1,364 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,618 |
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
Volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/bbl)
|
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive ($/bbl)
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil basis swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Buy variable price/sell variable price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/bbl)
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive ($/bbl)
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Sell variable price/buy variable price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/bbl)
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive ($/bbl)
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil freight swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Buy fixed price/sell variable price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/bbl)
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive ($/bbl)
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Buy variable price/sell fixed price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
Volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/bbl)
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive ($/bbl)
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil products swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Buy fixed price/sell variable price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
Volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/bbl)
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive ($/bbl)
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Buy variable price/sell fixed price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
Volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/bbl)
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive ($/bbl)
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 | |
|
Total contract/ | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
and after | |
|
notional amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Oil products basis swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Buy variable price/sell variable price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
Volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/bbl)
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive ($/bbl)
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Sell variable price/buy variable price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
Volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/bbl)
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive ($/bbl)
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Buy fixed price/sell variable price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
Volume (thousand megawatt hours MMwh)
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/Mwh)
|
|
|
50.5 |
|
|
|
51.3 |
|
|
|
50.4 |
|
|
|
51.9 |
|
|
|
66.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive ($/Mwh)
|
|
|
52.9 |
|
|
|
51.4 |
|
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
|
51.0 |
|
|
|
61.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Buy variable price/sell fixed price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Volume (MMwh)
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/Mwh)
|
|
|
54.1 |
|
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
53.8 |
|
|
|
53.5 |
|
|
|
59.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive ($/Mwh)
|
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
53.1 |
|
|
|
52.3 |
|
|
|
52.2 |
|
|
|
56.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Buy fixed price/sell variable price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
5,212 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,879 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
Volume (thousand million cubic feet bcf)
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Buy variable price/sell fixed price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
5,362 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
5,795 |
|
|
|
(711 |
) |
|
Volume (bcf)
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas basis swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Buy variable price/sell variable price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
Volume (bcf)
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
1.81 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
2.57 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 | |
|
Total contract/ | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
and after | |
|
notional amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
(b) Sell variable price/buy variable price contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
Volume (m bcf)
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average pay ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average receive ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,432 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
less than one million barrels |
|
|
** |
less than one thousand megawatt hours |
Shell Group companies also held chemical product and natural gas
liquid swaps at December 21, 2004 with a contract/notional
amount of $102 million (2003: $10 million) and an
estimated fair value of $(1) million (2003:
$(1) million) and expected maturity in
2005 2007 (2004).
|
|
|
Commodity swaps held for purposes other than
trading |
At December 31, 2003 Shell Group companies held crude oil,
natural gas and oil product commodity swaps for purposes other
than trading with a contract/notional amount of $82 million
and an estimated fair value of $1 million.
|
|
|
Commodity options held for trading purposes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 | |
|
Total contract/ | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
and after | |
|
notional amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil buy calls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
44.7 |
|
|
|
33.2 |
|
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil sell calls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
42.9 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil buy put
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
917 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil sell put
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
34.2 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil products buy put option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 | |
|
Total contract/ | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
and after | |
|
notional amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Oil products sell put option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil products buy call option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil products sell call option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas buy call
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
10,740 |
|
|
|
1,354 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,154 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
volume (bcf)
|
|
|
1,493 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas sell call
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
9,309 |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
10,397 |
|
|
|
(455 |
) |
|
volume (bcf)
|
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas buy put
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
8,332 |
|
|
|
942 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
9,313 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
volume (bcf)
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas sell put
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
9,547 |
|
|
|
986 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
10,598 |
|
|
|
(818 |
) |
|
volume (bcf)
|
|
|
1,996 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity buy call option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
volume (million MWh)
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/MWh)
|
|
|
48.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity sell call option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
volume (million MWh)
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/MWh)
|
|
|
48.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity buy put option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
volume (million MWh)
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/MWh)
|
|
|
41.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 | |
|
Total contract/ | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
and after | |
|
notional amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Electricity sell put option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
volume (million MWh)
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/MWh)
|
|
|
38.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,014 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
less than one million barrels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contract/ | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
notional amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil buy calls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
29.6 |
|
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil sell calls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil buy put
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil sell put
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil products buy put option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil products sell put option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil products buy call option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
42.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contract/ | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
notional amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Oil products sell call option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas buy call
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
8,112 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,556 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
volume (bcf)
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas sell call
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
6,788 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7,060 |
|
|
|
(528 |
) |
|
volume (bcf)
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas buy put
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
6,316 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,547 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
volume (bcf)
|
|
|
1,479 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas sell put
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
7,292 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7,727 |
|
|
|
(252 |
) |
|
volume (bcf)
|
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($ /thousand cf)
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity buy call option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
volume (million MWh)
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/MWh)
|
|
|
41.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity sell call option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
volume (MWh)
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/MWh)
|
|
|
39.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity buy put option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
volume (MWh)
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/MWh)
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity sell put option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
volume (MWh)
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average strike price ($/MWh)
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,513 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
less than one million barrels |
F-72
Shell Group companies also held chemical options at
December 31, 2003 with a contract/notional amount of
$1 million and estimated fair value less than
$1 million and expected maturity in 2004.
|
|
|
Commodity options held for purposes other than
trading |
At December 31, 2004 Shell Group companies held natural gas
commodity sales contracts for purposes other than trading with a
contract/notional amount of $1.6 billion (2003:
$1.1 billion) and estimated fair value of
$(359) million (2003: $(191) million) with expected
maturity 2005 - 2025.
|
|
|
Commodity futures held for trading purposes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contract/ | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
notional amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPE Brent futures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Short contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Long contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPE Gasoil futures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Short contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
34.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Long contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
39.42 |
|
|
|
32.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPE Natural gas futures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Short contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
volume (bcf)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/thousands cf)
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Long contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
volume (bcf)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contract/ | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
notional amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Nymex crude oil futures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Short contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
43.9 |
|
|
|
39.4 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Long contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
44.1 |
|
|
|
40.5 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nymex oil product futures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Short contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
50.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Long contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
51.9 |
|
|
|
47.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nymex natural gas futures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Short contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
1,824 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,946 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
volume (bcf)
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Long contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
volume (bcf)
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imarex freight futures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Short contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
volume (million tonnes)
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/tonne)
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Long contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
volume (million tonnes)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/tonne)
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contract/ | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
notional amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Nord Pool electricity futures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Short contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
volume (million MWh)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/MWh)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Long contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
volume (million MWh)
|
|
|
*** |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/MWh)
|
|
|
34.7 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,840 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
less than one million barrels |
|
|
|
|
** |
less than one billion cubic feet |
|
|
*** |
less than one million megawatt hours |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contract/ | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
notional amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPE Brent futures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Short contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Long contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPE Gasoil futures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Short contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Long contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
33.9 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contract/ | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
notional amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
IPE Natural gas futures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Short contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
volume (bcf)
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/thousand bcf)
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Long contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
volume (bcf)
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/thousand bcf
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nymex crude oil futures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Short contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
volume (mbbl)
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Long contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nymex oil product futures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Short contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
38.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Long contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
volume (m bbl)
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/bbl)
|
|
|
34.8 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nymex natural gas futures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Short contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
1,983 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,005 |
|
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
volume (bcf)
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Long contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,859 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
volume (bcf)
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/thousand cf)
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contract/ | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
notional amount | |
|
fair value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Nord Pool electricity futures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Short contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
volume (million MWh)
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/MWh)
|
|
|
31.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Long contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract/notional amount ($ million)
|
|
|
1,420 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,642 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
volume (million MWh)
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average price ($/MWh))
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,628 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
less than one million barrels. |
|
|
** |
less than one billion cubic feet. |
Futures contracts shown above represent unmatched positions. The
total contract/notional amount of short contracts represents an
aggregation of Shell Group companies positions where, at
December 31, 2004 and 2003 respectively, sales contracts
exceed the purchase contracts with the same maturity date. The
total contract/notional amount of long contracts represents an
aggregation of Shell Group companies positions where, at
December 31, 2004 and 2003 respectively, purchase contracts
exceed the sales contracts with the same maturity date.
F-77
Schedule I
The following table shows the net income and shareholders
equity in the Combined Financial Statements attributable to
Royal Dutch and Shell Transport, along with the currency
translation used to convert these amounts to the US GAAP amounts
shown in the financial statements of Royal Dutch (note 17)
and Shell Transport (note 14) as set forth in the
Form 20-F/A of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport for the year
ended December 31, 2004. Net income has been translated at
an average rate and shareholders equity has been
translated at the year end rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency of | |
|
|
|
|
financial statements | |
|
|
2004 |
|
in 2004 20-F/A | |
|
US$m | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Share of net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royal Dutch Petroleum Company
|
|
|
8,788m |
|
|
|
10,910 |
|
Shell Transport and Trading Company Limited
|
|
|
£3,973.0m |
|
|
|
7,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,182 |
|
Share of shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royal Dutch Petroleum Company
|
|
|
39,839m |
|
|
|
54,324 |
|
Shell Transport and Trading Company Limited
|
|
|
£18,785.0m |
|
|
|
36,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency of | |
|
|
|
|
financial statements | |
|
|
2003 |
|
in 2004 20-F/A | |
|
US$m | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Share of net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royal Dutch Petroleum Company
|
|
|
6,649m |
|
|
|
7,395 |
|
Shell Transport and Trading Company Limited
|
|
|
£3,045.2m |
|
|
|
4,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,322 |
|
Share of shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royal Dutch Petroleum Company
|
|
|
37,332m |
|
|
|
47,087 |
|
Shell Transport and Trading Company Limited
|
|
|
£17,478.8m |
|
|
|
31,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency of | |
|
|
|
|
financial statements | |
|
|
2002 |
|
in 2004 20-F/A | |
|
US$m | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Share of net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royal Dutch Petroleum Company
|
|
|
6,167m |
|
|
|
5,807 |
|
Shell Transport and Trading Company Limited
|
|
|
£2,578.0m |
|
|
|
3,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-78
Royal Dutch Petroleum Company and The Shell Transport and
Trading Company Limited
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Statements
For the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2005
(Comprising the combined financial statements of Royal Dutch
Petroleum Company and of The Shell Transport and Trading
Company Limited.)
F-79
CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM STATEMENT OF INCOME
(IFRS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended | |
|
Nine months ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Sales proceeds
|
|
|
94,717 |
|
|
|
89,006 |
|
|
|
286,168 |
|
|
|
243,634 |
|
Less: Sales taxes, excise duties and similar levies
|
|
|
18,282 |
|
|
|
18,321 |
|
|
|
54,933 |
|
|
|
53,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
76,435 |
|
|
|
70,685 |
|
|
|
231,235 |
|
|
|
190,085 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
60,704 |
|
|
|
58,604 |
|
|
|
188,733 |
|
|
|
157,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
15,731 |
|
|
|
12,081 |
|
|
|
42,502 |
|
|
|
32,184 |
|
Selling and distribution expenses
|
|
|
3,150 |
|
|
|
3,110 |
|
|
|
9,462 |
|
|
|
9,046 |
|
Administrative expenses
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
|
1,646 |
|
Exploration
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
Share of profit of equity accounted investments
|
|
|
3,081 |
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
5,734 |
|
|
|
3,496 |
|
Net finance costs and other income
|
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxation
|
|
|
15,042 |
|
|
|
9,387 |
|
|
|
36,392 |
|
|
|
23,726 |
|
Taxation
|
|
|
5,558 |
|
|
|
3,790 |
|
|
|
14,427 |
|
|
|
9,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
9,484 |
|
|
|
5,597 |
|
|
|
21,965 |
|
|
|
14,450 |
|
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations (see Note 7)
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income for the period
|
|
|
9,391 |
|
|
|
5,620 |
|
|
|
21,658 |
|
|
|
14,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to minority interest
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income attributable to Shareholders of Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport
|
|
|
9,078 |
|
|
|
5,371 |
|
|
|
20,989 |
|
|
|
13,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months | |
|
Nine months | |
|
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net income per Royal Dutch Petroleum Company share
|
|
|
2.74 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
6.29 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
2.77 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
6.38 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
0.02 |
|
Diluted net income per Royal Dutch Petroleum Company share
|
|
|
2.73 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
6.27 |
|
|
|
4.13 |
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
2.76 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
6.36 |
|
|
|
4.11 |
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
0.02 |
|
Net income per Shell Transport and Trading Company Limited share
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per Shell Transport and Trading Company
Limited share
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The Notes on pages F-84 to F-117 are an integral part of
these Condensed Combined Interim Financial Statements.
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-80
CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM BALANCE SHEET
(IFRS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 30, | |
|
Dec 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
85,601 |
|
|
|
87,918 |
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
4,361 |
|
|
|
4,528 |
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
equity accounted investments
|
|
|
17,138 |
|
|
|
20,493 |
|
|
|
financial assets
|
|
|
3,236 |
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
Deferred tax
|
|
|
3,039 |
|
|
|
2,789 |
|
|
Employee benefit assets
|
|
|
2,453 |
|
|
|
2,479 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,102 |
|
|
|
4,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,930 |
|
|
|
125,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
21,490 |
|
|
|
15,375 |
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
83,812 |
|
|
|
37,473 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
15,998 |
|
|
|
9,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,300 |
|
|
|
62,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
241,230 |
|
|
|
187,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
9,339 |
|
|
|
8,858 |
|
|
Deferred tax
|
|
|
12,411 |
|
|
|
12,930 |
|
|
Employee benefit obligations
|
|
|
6,018 |
|
|
|
6,795 |
|
|
Other provisions
|
|
|
7,114 |
|
|
|
6,828 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,395 |
|
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,277 |
|
|
|
41,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
6,714 |
|
|
|
5,734 |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
86,284 |
|
|
|
37,909 |
|
|
Taxes payable
|
|
|
12,510 |
|
|
|
9,058 |
|
|
Employee benefit obligations
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
Other provisions
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,064 |
|
|
|
54,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
146,341 |
|
|
|
96,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity share capital (see Note 9)
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
Non-equity share capital (see Note 9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
5,670 |
|
|
|
5,546 |
|
Treasury shares
|
|
|
(3,772 |
) |
|
|
(4,187 |
) |
Other reserves
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
3,319 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
85,695 |
|
|
|
80,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to Shareholders of Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport
|
|
|
88,279 |
|
|
|
86,070 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
6,610 |
|
|
|
5,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
94,889 |
|
|
|
91,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
241,230 |
|
|
|
187,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Notes on pages F-84 to F-117 are an integral part of
these Condensed Combined Interim Financial Statements.
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-81
CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(IFRS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to shareholders of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity | |
|
Preference | |
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
share | |
|
share | |
|
paid in | |
|
Treasury | |
|
Other | |
|
Retained | |
|
|
|
Minority | |
|
Total | |
|
|
capital(1) | |
|
capital(1) | |
|
capital | |
|
shares | |
|
reserves(2) | |
|
earnings | |
|
Total | |
|
interests | |
|
equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
At January 1, 2005
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
5,546 |
|
|
|
(4,187 |
) |
|
|
3,319 |
|
|
|
80,788 |
|
|
|
86,070 |
|
|
|
5,313 |
|
|
|
91,383 |
|
IAS 32/39 transition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
796 |
|
Income for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,989 |
|
|
|
20,989 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
21,658 |
|
Income/(expense) recognised directly in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,039 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(3,911 |
) |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(3,819 |
) |
Change in minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
733 |
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,579 |
) |
|
|
(15,579 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
(15,776 |
) |
(Purchase)/release of treasury shares, net of dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415 |
|
Shares repurchased for cancellation
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2005
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,670 |
|
|
|
(3,772 |
) |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
85,695 |
|
|
|
88,279 |
|
|
|
6,610 |
|
|
|
94,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2004
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
5,432 |
|
|
|
(3,428 |
) |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
70,412 |
|
|
|
73,535 |
|
|
|
3,408 |
|
|
|
76,943 |
|
Income for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,969 |
|
|
|
13,969 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
14,516 |
|
Income/(expense) recognised directly in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(857 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(749 |
) |
Change in minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
964 |
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,390 |
) |
|
|
(7,390 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(7,592 |
) |
(Purchase)/release of treasury shares, net of dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(740 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(740 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(740 |
) |
Shares repurchased for cancellation
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(792 |
) |
|
|
(795 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(795 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2004
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
5,523 |
|
|
|
(4,168 |
) |
|
|
(345 |
) |
|
|
76,199 |
|
|
|
77,813 |
|
|
|
4,734 |
|
|
|
82,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
See Note 9. |
|
(2) |
See Note 4. |
The Notes on pages F-84 to F-117 are an integral part of
these Condensed Combined Interim Financial Statements.
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-82
CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(IFRS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Cash flow from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income for the period
|
|
|
21,658 |
|
|
|
14,515 |
|
Adjustment for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxation accrued
|
|
|
14,945 |
|
|
|
9,544 |
|
|
Interest accrued
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortisation
|
|
|
9,194 |
|
|
|
8,655 |
|
|
(Profit)/loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
(1,103 |
) |
|
|
(859 |
) |
|
Decrease/(increase) in net working capital
|
|
|
(5,587 |
) |
|
|
(4,237 |
) |
|
Share of profit of equity accounted investments
|
|
|
(5,512 |
) |
|
|
(3,562 |
) |
|
Dividends received from equity accounted investments
|
|
|
5,268 |
|
|
|
2,731 |
|
|
Deferred taxation and other provisions
|
|
|
(646 |
) |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,102 |
) |
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from operating activities (pre-tax)
|
|
|
37,599 |
|
|
|
26,934 |
|
Taxation paid
|
|
|
(12,579 |
) |
|
|
(6,746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from operating activities
|
|
|
25,020 |
|
|
|
20,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditure
|
|
|
(10,457 |
) |
|
|
(8,911 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
Proceeds from sales and (additions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
equity accounted investments
|
|
|
3,535 |
|
|
|
(380 |
) |
|
investments: financial assets
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
Interest received
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities
|
|
|
(4,027 |
) |
|
|
(6,590 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in debt
|
|
|
1,988 |
|
|
|
(2,963 |
) |
Interest paid
|
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
(671 |
) |
Change in minority interest
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
Net issue/ (repurchase) of shares
|
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
(698 |
) |
Dividends paid to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport
|
|
|
(15,677 |
) |
|
|
(7,309 |
) |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
Treasury shares: net sales/(purchases) and dividends received
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
(738 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities
|
|
|
(13,946 |
) |
|
|
(11,721 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation differences relating to cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
6,797 |
|
|
|
1,840 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
9,201 |
|
|
|
2,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
|
15,998 |
|
|
|
3,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Notes on pages F-84 to F-117 are an integral part of
these Condensed Combined Interim Financial Statements.
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-83
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Presentation
|
|
|
Royal Dutch Petroleum Company and The Shell Transport and
Trading Company Limited |
Royal Dutch Petroleum Company (Royal Dutch) and The
Shell Transport and Trading Company Limited (Shell
Transport, previously known as The Shell
Transport and Trading Company, p.l.c.) entered into a scheme of
amalgamation dated September 12, 1906 and agreements from
1907 by which the scheme of amalgamation was implemented and
pursuant to which they amalgamated their interests
in the oil industry. This transaction has been accounted for as
one involving a single economic entity, based on the history of
the operation and management of Royal Dutch, Shell Transport and
the Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies (the Royal Dutch/
Shell Group). Since that time, Royal Dutch has owned 60%
of the Royal Dutch/ Shell Group and Shell Transport has owned
40% of the Royal Dutch/ Shell Group. All operating activities
have been conducted through the Royal Dutch/ Shell Group and the
Royal Dutch/ Shell Group has operated as a single economic
enterprise. Prior to the consummation of the Transaction
(defined below), economic interests of the Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport shareholders in the Royal Dutch/ Shell Group reflected
the 60:40 economic interests of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport
in the Royal Dutch/ Shell Group.
The Condensed Combined Interim Financial Statements reflect the
combined financial position of Royal Dutch, Shell Transport and
the Royal Dutch/ Shell Group. These Financial Statements provide
a more meaningful presentation of the financial results of Royal
Dutch, Shell Transport and the Royal Dutch/ Shell Group than the
individual Financial Statements of these entities as a result of
the Transaction (described below) in which Royal Dutch Shell
plc, a publicly listed company headquartered and tax resident in
The Netherlands (Royal Dutch Shell), became the
single parent company controlling Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport.
Net income was allocated between Royal Dutch and Shell Transport
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months | |
|
|
|
|
ended | |
|
Nine months ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Royal Dutch
|
|
|
5,447 |
|
|
|
3,223 |
|
|
|
12,594 |
|
|
|
8,381 |
|
Shell Transport
|
|
|
3,631 |
|
|
|
2,148 |
|
|
|
8,395 |
|
|
|
5,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,078 |
|
|
|
5,371 |
|
|
|
20,989 |
|
|
|
13,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity was allocated between Royal Dutch and
Shell Transport as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept. 30, | |
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Royal Dutch
|
|
|
52,967 |
|
|
|
51,642 |
|
Shell Transport
|
|
|
35,312 |
|
|
|
34,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,279 |
|
|
|
86,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The basic earnings per share amounts shown relate to profit
after taxation. The basic earnings per share number has been
restated to exclude shares held by Shell Group (as defined
below) companies for stock options and other incentive
compensation plans. For the purpose of the calculation, shares
repurchased under the buy
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-84
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
back programme are deemed to have been cancelled on purchase
date. The calculations use the following weighted-average number
of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended | |
|
Nine months ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Royal Dutch
|
|
|
1,984,420,979 |
|
|
|
2,018,231,477 |
|
|
|
2,001,475,299 |
|
|
|
2,026,830,771 |
|
Shell Transport
|
|
|
9,423,242,311 |
|
|
|
9,460,440,999 |
|
|
|
9,426,262,883 |
|
|
|
9,493,874,001 |
|
The diluted earnings per share are based on the same profit
figures. For this calculation, the following weighted-average
number of shares are used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended | |
|
Nine months ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Royal Dutch
|
|
|
1,993,403,299 |
|
|
|
2,020,728,970 |
|
|
|
2,008,538,475 |
|
|
|
2,028,688,303 |
|
Shell Transport
|
|
|
9,455,010,531 |
|
|
|
9,466,211,000 |
|
|
|
9,450,450,597 |
|
|
|
9,497,099,001 |
|
The difference between the basic and diluted number of shares
relates to stock option schemes as mentioned above.
The Transaction and Royal
Dutch Shell plc
On July 20, 2005, Royal Dutch Shell became the parent
company of Royal Dutch Petroleum and Shell Transport and,
through Royal Dutch and Shell Transport, of the rest of the
Shell Group (as defined below) following (a) the
registration by the Registrar of Companies in England and Wales
of the order of the High Court of Justice in England and Wales
sanctioning the scheme of arrangement of Shell Transport under
English law (the Scheme) and (b) Royal Dutch
Shells confirmation that its exchange offer (the
Exchange Offer, and together with the Scheme, the
Unification Transaction) for all of the ordinary
shares of Royal Dutch, commenced on May 19, 2005, had
become unconditional (gestanddoening). Pursuant to the
Unification Transaction, on July 20, 2005, Royal Dutch
Shell acquired all the outstanding capital stock of Shell
Transport and approximately 92% of the outstanding capital stock
of Royal Dutch. On July 20, 2005, Royal Dutch Shell
commenced a subsequent offer acceptance period during which the
remaining holders of Royal Dutch shares were permitted to tender
their shares in exchange for Royal Dutch Shell shares (or ADRs),
in accordance with the procedures described in the Exchange
Offer. The subsequent offer acceptance period expired on
9 August 2005. As a result of the Exchange Offer, including
the subsequent offer acceptance period, Royal Dutch Shell
acquired and currently holds 98.5% of the outstanding capital
stock of Royal Dutch. Shareholders of Royal Dutch who did not
validly tender their shares in the Exchange Offer (the
Minority) hold an interest in the same economic
entity as that of the shareholders of Royal Dutch Shell.
Effectively, the 1.5% minority interest in Royal Dutch Shell
represents a 0.9% interest in the Shell Group.
Pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Offer and the Scheme,
holders of ordinary shares of Royal Dutch (Royal Dutch
Ordinary Shares), holders of Shell Transport Ordinary
shares (the Shell Transport Ordinary Shares),
holders of Shell Transport bearer warrants and holders of
American depositary receipts representing Shell Transport
Ordinary Shares (the Shell Transport ADRs) received,
respectively:
|
|
|
for each Royal Dutch Ordinary Share held in New York
registry form tendered: |
|
1 Royal Dutch Shell Class A American depositary receipt
(representing 2 Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary
shares) |
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-85
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
for each Royal Dutch Ordinary Share held in bearer
or Hague registry form tendered: |
|
2 Royal Dutch Shell Class A ordinary shares |
|
for each Shell Transport Ordinary Share (including
Shell Transport Ordinary Shares to which holders of Shell
Transport bearer warrants are entitled): |
|
0.287333066 Royal Dutch Shell Class B ordinary shares |
|
for each Shell Transport ADR: |
|
0.861999198 Royal Dutch Shell Class B American depositary
receipts (representing 2 Royal Dutch Shell Class B
ordinary shares) |
On October 31, 2005 Royal Dutch Shell and Royal Dutch
announced that they propose to implement an internal
restructuring and merger of certain subsidiaries to achieve
governance, management and fiscal efficiencies. As part of the
restructuring, Royal Dutch would be merged into a subsidiary,
Shell Petroleum N.V. (SPNV), and the remaining
shareholders in Royal Dutch would receive
52.21 per Royal
Dutch Ordinary Share held or, at the option of eligible UK
resident shareholders who so elect the equivalent principal
amount of sterling denominated loan notes exchangeable into
Royal Dutch Shell A shares. Following approval at an
extraordinary general meeting (EGM), the restructuring is
expected to be effective December 21, 2005. The terms of
the merger provide (a) for interest to accrue on the merger
consideration at the statutory rate of 4% per annum from
October 31, 2005 until the effective date of the merger, as
part of the consideration under the merger, and (b) for any
dividends payable in that period (before the deduction of any
withholding tax from such dividend) to be deducted from that
interest amount. As the interim dividend for the third quarter
of 2005 of 0.46
per share (or $0.5556 per share for holders of New York
registered shares) payable on December 15, 2005 will exceed
the amount of interest accrued at 4% per annum to
December 21, 2005 (the expected effective date of the
merger), no interest is expected to be payable.
2. Basis of preparation
The Condensed Combined Interim Financial Statements of Royal
Dutch and Shell Transport and their combined subsidiaries
(referred to as the Shell Group or
Group) for the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2005 have been prepared in accordance with
International Accounting Standard (IAS) 34 Interim Financial
Reporting and with the policies set out in Note 3.
Royal Dutch and Shell Transport will adopt IFRS for the first
time in their Financial Statements for the year ending
December 31, 2005, which will include comparative Financial
Statements for the year ended December 31, 2004.
IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial
Reporting Standards requires that an entity develop accounting
policies based on the standards and related interpretations
effective at the reporting date of its first annual IFRS
Financial Statements (December 31, 2005). IFRS 1 also
requires that those policies be applied as of the date of
transition to IFRS (January 1, 2004) and throughout all
periods presented in the first IFRS Financial Statements. The
accompanying interim financial information as of and for the
nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, has
been prepared in accordance with those IASB standards and IFRIC
interpretations issued and effective, or issued and
early-adopted, as at the date of this report. The IASB standards
and IFRIC interpretations that will be applicable at
December 31, 2005, including those that will be applicable
on an optional basis, are not known with certainty at the time
of preparing this interim financial information. As a result,
the accounting policies used to prepare these Financial
Statements are subject to change up to the reporting date of the
first IFRS Financial Statements of Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport.
The Shell Groups first application of IFRS and the
accounting policies are set out in Note 3 below. The
Combined Financial Statements of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport
for 2004 had been prepared in accordance
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-86
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
with US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP);
accounting policies were set out in Note 3 to those
Financial Statements. US GAAP differs in certain respects
from IFRS and comparative figures for 2004 have been restated as
necessary in accordance with IFRS. Reconciliations and
descriptions of the effect of the transition from US GAAP
to IFRS on equity and income are given below in Note 12,
including a description of the nature of the changes in
accounting policies. As part of the Shell Groups adoption
of IFRS, the following elections were made under IFRS 1
First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting
Standards as at January 1, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
cumulative currency translation differences were eliminated by
transfer to retained earnings. |
|
|
|
cumulative previously unrecognised actuarial gains and losses on
post-employment benefits were recognised. |
|
|
|
prior business combinations have not been restated. |
|
|
|
IFRS 2 Share-based Payment has only been applied to options
issued after November 7, 2002 and not vested by
January 1, 2005. |
The policies set out in Note 3 below have been consistently
applied to all periods presented except, as explained in the
Note, for those relating to the classification and measurement
of financial instruments to the extent that IFRS differs from
US GAAP. The Shell Group has taken the exemption available
under IFRS 1 to apply IAS 32 and IAS 39 from
January 1, 2005 and the impact on transition is described
in Notes 4 and 8.
The Condensed Combined Interim Financial Statements have been
prepared under the historical cost convention as modified by the
revaluation of certain financial assets and liabilities.
The preparation of interim financial information in conformity
with IFRS requires the use of certain accounting estimates. It
also requires management to exercise its judgement in the
process of applying the Shell Groups accounting policies.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The Condensed Combined Interim Financial Statements on
pages F-79 to F-117 should be read in conjunction with the
Combined Royal Dutch and Shell Transport Financial Statements
for the year ended December 31, 2004 on pages F-4 to
F-51.
3. Accounting policies
Nature of the Condensed
Combined Interim Financial Statements
The Condensed Combined Interim Financial Statements are
presented in US dollars and include the accounts of Royal Dutch
and Shell Transport and of those companies in which they either,
directly or indirectly, have control either through a majority
of the voting rights or the right to exercise a controlling
influence or to obtain the majority of the benefits and be
exposed to the majority of the risks.
Revenue recognition
Revenue from sales of oil, natural gas, chemicals and all other
products is recognised when the significant risks and rewards of
ownership have been transferred, which is when title passes to
the customer. In Exploration & Production and Gas &
Power this generally occurs when product is physically
transferred into a vessel, pipe or other delivery mechanism. For
sales by refining companies, it is either when product is placed
onboard a vessel or offloaded from the vessel, depending on the
contractually agreed terms. For wholesale sales of oil products
and chemicals it is either at the point of delivery or the point
of receipt, depending on contractual conditions.
Revenue resulting from the production of oil and natural gas
properties in which the Shell Group has an interest with other
producers is recognised on the basis of the Shell Groups
working interest (entitlement method). Gains and losses on
derivatives contracts and contracts involved in energy trading
and risk management
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-87
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
are shown net in the Statement of Income if these contracts are
held for trading purposes. Purchase and sale of hydrocarbons
under exchange contracts that are necessary to obtain or
reposition feedstock utilised in the Shell Groups refinery
operations are shown net in the Statement of Income. Sales
between Shell Group companies, as disclosed in the segment
information, are based on prices generally equivalent to
commercially available prices.
The Shell Group enters in to certain contracts that are
classified and held for trading purposes. Revenue and costs
associated with such contracts are reported on a net basis in
the Statement of Income.
Segmental reporting
The Shell Group is engaged in all principal aspects of the oil
and natural gas industry, including chemicals, power generation
and renewable energy. The Shell Group conducts its business
through five principal segments, Exploration &
Production, Gas & Power, Oil Products, Chemicals and
Corporate and Other. These activities are conducted in more than
140 countries and territories.
Property, plant and
equipment and intangible assets
(a) Recognition on the
Balance Sheet
Property, plant and equipment, including expenditure on major
inspections, and intangible assets are initially recorded on the
Balance Sheet at cost where it is probable that they will
generate future economic benefits. This includes capitalisation
of decommissioning and restoration costs associated with
provisions for asset retirement (see Provisions) and
certain development costs (see Research and
development). Accounting for exploration costs is
described separately below (Exploration costs).
Intangible assets include goodwill. Interest is capitalised, as
an increase in property, plant and equipment, on capital
projects during construction.
Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets are
subsequently recognised at cost less accumulated depreciation
and impairment.
(b) Depreciation,
depletion and amortisation
Property, plant and equipment related to oil and natural gas
production activities are depreciated on a unit-of-production
basis over the proved developed reserves of the field concerned,
except in the case of assets whose useful life is shorter than
the lifetime of the field, in which case the straight-line
method is applied. Rights and concessions are depleted on the
unit-of-production basis over the total proved reserves of the
relevant area. Unproved properties are amortised as required by
particular circumstances. Other property, plant and equipment
are generally depreciated on a straight-line basis over their
estimated useful lives which is generally 20 years for
refineries and chemicals plants, 15 years for retail
service station facilities, and until the next planned major
inspection (generally 3 to 5 years) for inspection costs.
Property, plant and equipment held under finance leases are
depreciated over the shorter of the assets estimated
useful lives and the lease term.
Goodwill is not amortised but instead tested for impairment
annually. Other intangible assets are amortised on a
straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives (for
periods up to forty years).
(c) Impairment of
assets
Other than properties with no proved reserves (where the basis
for carrying costs on the Balance Sheet is explained under
Exploration costs), the carrying amounts of major
Exploration & Production property, plant and equipment are
reviewed for possible impairment annually, while all assets are
reviewed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amounts for those assets may not be
recoverable. If assets are determined to be impaired, the
carrying amounts of those assets are written down to recoverable
amount which is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and
value in use. For this purpose, assets are grouped based on
separately
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-88
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
identifiable and largely independent cash flows. Assets held for
sale are recognised at the lower of the carrying amount and fair
value less costs to sell. No further provision for depreciation
is charged on such assets.
Estimates of future cash flows used in the evaluation for
impairment of assets related to hydrocarbon production are made
using risk assessments on field and reservoir performance and
include outlooks on proved reserves and unproved volumes, which
are then discounted or risk-weighted utilising the results from
projections of geological, production, recovery and economic
factors.
Impairments, except those related to goodwill, are reversed as
applicable to the extent that the events or circumstances that
triggered the original impairment have changed.
Exploration costs
Shell Group companies follow the successful efforts method of
accounting for oil and natural gas exploration costs.
Exploration costs are charged to income when incurred, except
that exploratory drilling costs are included in property, plant
and equipment, pending determination of proved reserves.
Exploration wells that are more than 12 months old are
expensed unless (a) (i) they are in an area requiring major
capital expenditure before production can begin and
(ii) they have found commercially producible quantities of
reserves and (iii) they are subject to further exploration or
appraisal activity in that either drilling of additional
exploratory wells is under way or firmly planned for the near
future, or (b) proved reserves are booked within
12 months following the completion of exploratory drilling.
Unless, in accordance with FASB Staff Position FSP FAS ig-1,
(a) the well found a sufficient quantity of reserves to
justify its completion as a producing well and (b) the
entity is making sufficient progress assessing the reserves and
the economic and operating viability of the project.
Associated companies and
joint ventures
Investments in companies over which Shell Group companies have
significant influence but not control are classified as
associated companies and are accounted for on the equity basis.
Interests in jointly controlled entities are also recognised on
the equity basis. Interests in jointly controlled assets are
recognised by including the Shell Group share of assets,
liabilities, income and expenses on a line-by-line basis.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at cost to the Shell Group or net
realisable value, whichever is lower. Such cost is determined by
the first-in first-out (FIFO) method and comprises direct
purchase costs, cost of production, transportation and
manufacturing expenses and taxes.
Deferred taxation
Deferred taxation is provided using the liability method of
accounting for income taxes based on provisions of enacted or
substantively enacted laws. Recognition is given to deferred tax
assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences
of events that have been recognised in the Condensed Combined
Interim Financial Statements or in the tax returns (temporary
differences); deferred tax is not generally provided on initial
recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that, at
the time of the transaction, affects neither accounting nor
taxable profit. In estimating these tax consequences,
consideration is given to expected future events.
Deferred tax assets are recognised where future recovery is
probable. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are presented
separately in the Balance Sheet except where there is a right of
set-off within fiscal jurisdictions.
Deferred tax is not provided for taxes on possible future
distributions of retained earnings of Shell Group companies and
equity accounted investments where the timing of the
distribution can be controlled and it is probable that the
retained earnings will be reinvested by the companies concerned.
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-89
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Employee benefits
(a) Employee retirement
plans
Retirement plans to which employees contribute and many
non-contributory plans are generally funded by payments to
independent trusts. Where, due to local conditions, a plan is
not funded, a provision is made. Valuations of both funded and
unfunded plans are carried out by independent actuaries.
For plans which define the amount of pension benefit to be
provided, pension cost primarily represents the increase in
actuarial present value of the obligation for pension benefits
based on employee service during the year and the interest on
this obligation in respect of employee service in previous
years, net of the expected return on plan assets.
Unrecognised gains and losses at the date of transition to IFRS
have been recognised in the 2004 opening balance sheet. The
Shell Group recognises actuarial gains and losses that arise
subsequent to January 1, 2004 using the corridor method.
Under this method, to the extent that any cumulative
unrecognised actuarial gain or loss exceeds 10% of the greater
of the present value of the defined benefit obligation and the
fair value of plan assets, that portion is recognised in income
over the expected average remaining working lives of the
employees participating in the plan. Otherwise, the actuarial
gain or loss is not recognised.
For plans where benefits depend solely on the amount contributed
to the employees account and the returns earned on
investments of these contributions, pension cost is the amount
of contributions payable by Shell Group companies for the period.
(b) Postretirement
benefits other than pensions
Some Shell Group companies provide certain postretirement
healthcare and life insurance benefits to retirees, the
entitlement to which is usually based on the employee remaining
in service up to retirement age and the completion of a minimum
service period. These plans are not funded and a provision is
made. Valuations of benefits are carried out by independent
actuaries.
The expected costs of postretirement benefits other than
pensions are accrued over the periods employees render service
to the Shell Group. Unrecognised gains and losses at the date of
transition to IFRS have been recognised in the 2004 opening
balance sheet. The Shell Group recognises actuarial gains and
losses that arise subsequent to January 1, 2004 using the
corridor method.
(c) Share-based
compensation plans
The fair value of share-based compensation granted to employees
after November 7, 2002, and which had not vested by
January 1, 2005, is recognised as an expense from the date
of grant over the vesting period with a corresponding increase
directly in equity. The fair value of the Shell Groups
share-based compensation for options was estimated using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model.
Leases
Agreements under which Shell Group companies make payments to
owners in return for the right to use an asset for a period are
accounted for as leases. Leases that transfer substantially all
the risks and rewards of ownership are recorded at inception as
finance leases within property, plant and equipment and debt.
All other leases are recorded as operating leases and the costs
are charged to income as incurred.
Financial instruments and
other derivative contracts
The Shell Group adopted IAS 32 and IAS 39 with effect from
January 1, 2005 and therefore accounted for financial
instruments and other derivative contracts until the end of 2004
under US GAAP. Information for 2004
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-90
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
has not been restated and the impact on transition, which is
mainly restricted to certain commodity contracts and embedded
derivatives, unquoted investments with estimable fair values, is
included in the description below.
(a) Financial assets
Investments: financial assets comprise debt and equity
securities.
Securities
of a trading nature
Securities of a trading nature are carried at fair value with
unrealised holding gains and losses being included in income.
Securities
held to maturity
Securities held to maturity are carried at amortised cost,
unless impaired.
Available
for sale securities
All other securities are classified as available for sale and
are carried at fair value, other than unquoted equity securities
with no estimable fair value which are carried at cost, less any
impairment. Unrealised holding gains and losses other than
impairments are taken directly to equity, except for translation
differences arising on foreign currency debt securities which
are taken to income. Upon sale or maturity, the net gains and
losses are included in income.
Fair value is based on market prices where available, otherwise
it is calculated as the net present value of expected future
cash flows.
From January 1, 2005 this has resulted in certain unquoted
equity securities being recognised at fair value compared with
recognition at cost under US GAAP and the impact on transition
is disclosed in Note 8. This change in accounting has no
impact on the timing of recognition of income arising from these
investments.
Securities forming part of a portfolio which is required to be
held long-term are classified under investments.
Interest on debt securities is accounted for in income by
applying the effective interest method. Dividends on equity
securities are accounted for in income when receivable.
Receivables
Receivables are recognised initially at fair value based on
amounts exchanged and subsequently at amortised cost less any
impairment.
Cash
and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand, short-term
deposits and other investments which have a maturity from
acquisition of three months or less and are readily convertible
into known amounts of cash.
(b) Financial
liabilities
Debt and accounts payable are recognised initially at fair value
based on amounts exchanged and subsequently at amortised cost,
except for fixed rate debt subject to fair value hedging.
Interest expense, other than interest capitalised, is accounted
for in income using the effective interest method.
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-91
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(c) Derivative
contracts
Shell Group companies use derivatives in the management of
interest rate risk, foreign currency risk and commodity price
risk. These derivative contracts are recognised at fair value,
using market prices.
Those derivatives qualifying and designated as hedges are
either: (1) a fair value hedge of the change in
fair value of a recognised asset or liability or an unrecognised
firm commitment, or (2) a cash flow hedge of
the change in cash flows to be received or paid relating to a
recognised asset or liability or a highly probable forecasted
transaction.
A change in the fair value of a hedging instrument designated as
a fair value hedge is taken to income, together with the
consequential adjustment to the carrying amount of the hedged
item. The effective portion of a change in fair value of a
derivative designated as a cash flow hedge is recognised
directly in equity, until income reflects the variability of
underlying cash flows; any ineffective portion is taken to
income.
Shell Group companies formally document all relationships
between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as risk
management objectives and strategies for undertaking hedge
transactions. The effectiveness of a hedge is also continually
assessed and when it ceases, hedge accounting is discontinued.
Certain contracts to purchase and sell commodities are required
to be recognised at fair value, generally based on market prices
(with gains and losses taken to income). These are contracts
which can be net settled or sales contracts containing volume
optionality.
Certain embedded derivatives within contracts are required to be
separated from their host contract and recognised at fair value,
generally based on market prices (with gains and losses taken to
income), if the economic characteristics and risks of the
embedded derivative are not closely related to that of the host
contract.
These policies are very similar to those applied until the end
of 2004 under US GAAP and the impact of transition on
January 1, 2005 is shown in Note 8.
Provisions
Provisions are liabilities where the timing or amount of future
expenditure is uncertain. Provisions are recorded at the best
estimate of the present value of the expenditure required to
settle the present obligation at the balance sheet date.
Non-current amounts are discounted using the risk-free rate.
Specific details for decommissioning and restoration costs and
environmental remediation are described below.
Estimated decommissioning and restoration costs are based on
current requirements, technology and price levels and are stated
at fair value, and the associated asset retirement costs are
capitalised as part of the carrying amount of the related
property, plant and equipment. The liability, once an obligation
(whether legal or constructive) crystallises, is recognised with
a corresponding amount of property, plant and equipment in the
period when a reasonable estimate of the fair value can be made.
The fair value is calculated using amounts discounted over the
useful economic life of the assets. The effects of changes
resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the
original estimate of the provision are incorporated on a
prospective basis.
Provisions for environmental remediation resulting from ongoing
or past operations or events are recognised in the period in
which an obligation, legal or constructive, to a third party
arises and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Measurement
of liabilities is based on current legal requirements and
existing technology. Recognition of any joint and several
liability is based upon Shell Group companies best
estimate of their final pro rata share of the liability.
Liabilities are determined independently of expected insurance
recoveries. Recoveries are recognised and reported as separate
events and brought into account when reasonably certain of
realisation. The carrying amount of provisions is regularly
reviewed and adjusted for new facts or changes in law or
technology.
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-92
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Treasury shares
Shares in Royal Dutch and Shell Transport held by Shell Group
Employee Share Ownership Trusts are not included in assets but,
after deducting dividends received, are reflected at cost as a
deduction from equity as treasury shares.
Administrative
expenses
Administrative expenses are those which do not relate directly
to the activities of a single business segment and include
expenses incurred in the management and co-ordination of
multi-segment enterprises.
Research and
development
Development costs which are expected to generate probable future
economic benefits are capitalised. All other research and
development expenditure is charged to income as incurred, with
the exception of that on buildings and major items of equipment
which have alternative use.
Discontinued
operations
Discontinued operations comprise those activities which have
been disposed of during the period, or remain held for sale at
period end, and represent a separate major line of business or
geographical area of operation which can be clearly
distinguished, operationally and for financial reporting
purposes, from other activities of the Shell Group.
Business combinations
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed on a business
combination are recognised at their fair value at the date of
the acquisition; the amount of the purchase consideration above
this value is reflected as goodwill.
Currency translation
Assets and liabilities of non-US dollar Shell Group companies
are translated to US dollars at year-end rates of exchange,
whilst their statements of income and cash flows are translated
at quarterly average rates. Translation differences arising on
aggregation are taken directly to a currency translation
differences account within equity. As part of the transition to
IFRS, the balance of this account was eliminated at
January 1, 2004 and transferred to retained earnings with
no impact on total equity. Upon divestment or liquidation of an
entity, cumulative currency translation differences related to
that entity are taken to income.
The US dollar equivalents of exchange gains and losses arising
as a result of foreign currency transactions (including those in
respect of inter-company balances unless related to transactions
of a long-term investment nature) are included in income.
New accounting standards and
interpretations
Certain new IFRS and IFRIC interpretations have been published
which are not mandatory for 2005. The Shell Group has elected to
early adopt in 2005 IFRS 6 Exploration for and Evaluation of
Mineral Resources and IFRIC 4 Determining whether an Arrangement
Contains a Lease, and these are reflected in the accounting
policies described above. All other published pronouncements,
which are not mandatory in 2005, are not expected to have an
impact on the Shell Group.
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-93
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
4. Other reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(expense) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
At Jan 1, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
after | |
|
|
|
|
At Dec 31, | |
|
IAS 32/39 | |
|
IAS 32/39 | |
|
|
|
At Sept 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
transition | |
|
transition | |
|
Movement | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Cumulative currency translation differences
|
|
|
3,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,126 |
|
|
|
(3,843 |
) |
|
|
(717 |
) |
Unrealised gains/(losses) on securities
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
Unrealised gains/(losses) on cash flow hedges
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
(932 |
) |
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,319 |
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
4,142 |
|
|
|
(4,039 |
) |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(expense) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
At Jan 1, | |
|
|
|
At Sept 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
Movement | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Cumulative currency translation differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
|
(403 |
) |
Unrealised gains/(losses) on securities
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
(443 |
) |
|
|
257 |
|
Unrealised gains/(losses) on cash flow hedges
|
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
(857 |
) |
|
|
(345 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Earnings per share
The basic earnings per share amounts shown relates to income
attributable to Royal Dutch and Shell Transport shareholders.
Details regarding the weighted-average number of shares used are
contained in Note 1.
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-94
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
6. Information by business
segment
Following a change in business circumstances certain contracts
are classified as held for trading purposes and reported net
rather than gross with effect from the third quarter of 2005.
Refer to Note 11 for the revenue and cost of sales effect.
Three months ended September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration & | |
|
Gas & | |
|
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Production | |
|
Power | |
|
Oil Products | |
|
Chemicals | |
|
Other | |
|
Elimination | |
|
Shell Group | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third party
|
|
|
7,078 |
|
|
|
3,086 |
|
|
|
58,877 |
|
|
|
7,311 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,435 |
|
|
Inter-segment
|
|
|
8,603 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
1,709 |
|
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,894 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
15,681 |
|
|
|
3,503 |
|
|
|
60,586 |
|
|
|
8,476 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment result
|
|
|
7,136 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
4,241 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,693 |
|
Share of profit of equity accounted investments
|
|
|
2,220 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,081 |
|
Net finance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
Taxation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,484 |
|
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-95
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Three months ended September 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration & | |
|
Gas & | |
|
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Production | |
|
Power | |
|
Oil Products | |
|
Chemicals | |
|
Other | |
|
Elimination | |
|
Shell Group | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third party
|
|
|
5,640 |
|
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
55,761 |
|
|
|
6,915 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,685 |
|
|
Inter-segment
|
|
|
6,582 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
1,445 |
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
12,222 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
57,206 |
|
|
|
7,808 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment result
|
|
|
4,737 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
3,087 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,144 |
|
Share of profit of equity accounted investments
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
Net finance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
Taxation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,597 |
|
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
Gas & | |
|
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Production | |
|
Power | |
|
Oil Products | |
|
Chemicals | |
|
Other | |
|
Elimination | |
|
Group | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third party
|
|
|
17,717 |
|
|
|
9,221 |
|
|
|
180,799 |
|
|
|
22,941 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,235 |
|
|
Inter-segment
|
|
|
24,125 |
|
|
|
1,143 |
|
|
|
4,765 |
|
|
|
2,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,915 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
41,842 |
|
|
|
10,364 |
|
|
|
185,564 |
|
|
|
25,823 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Result
|
|
|
18,686 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
10,829 |
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
(711 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,499 |
|
Share of profit of equity accounted investments
|
|
|
3,394 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,734 |
|
Net finance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235 |
|
Taxation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,965 |
|
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-96
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Nine months ended September 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
Gas & | |
|
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Production | |
|
Power | |
|
Oil Products | |
|
Chemicals | |
|
Other | |
|
Elimination | |
|
Group | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third party
|
|
|
12,350 |
|
|
|
6,502 |
|
|
|
151,442 |
|
|
|
19,053 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,085 |
|
|
Inter-segment
|
|
|
18,324 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
3,815 |
|
|
|
2,387 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(25,410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
30,674 |
|
|
|
7,382 |
|
|
|
155,257 |
|
|
|
21,440 |
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Result
|
|
|
12,400 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
7,241 |
|
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
(623 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,198 |
|
Share of profit of equity accounted investments
|
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,496 |
|
Net finance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
613 |
|
Taxation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,450 |
|
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The information above is provided in accordance with IAS 14
Segment Reporting. Operating segment results are appraised by
management on the basis of income including equity accounted
investments and certain net finance costs and other
(income)/expense and after tax. The table below reconciles the
foregoing segment information to the information used for
management reporting and is consistent with how the information
will be presented in the Shell Groups annual Financial
Statements to comply with SFAS 131.
Income for the period by segment Three months
ended September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate | |
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
Gas & | |
|
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
Total | |
|
|
Production | |
|
Power | |
|
Oil Products | |
|
Chemicals | |
|
Other | |
|
Group | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Segment result IAS 14
|
|
|
7,136 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
4,241 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
11,693 |
|
Share of profit of equity accounted investments
|
|
|
2,220 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
3,081 |
|
Net finance costs and other (income)/expense
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(268 |
) |
Taxation
|
|
|
4,326 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
1,296 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
5,558 |
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment result
|
|
|
4,977 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
3,440 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
9,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-97
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Income for the period by segment Three months
ended September 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate | |
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
Gas & | |
|
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
Total | |
|
|
Production | |
|
Power | |
|
Oil Products | |
|
Chemicals | |
|
Other | |
|
Group | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Segment result IAS 14
|
|
|
4,737 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
3,087 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
8,144 |
|
Share of profit of equity accounted investments
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
1,254 |
|
Net finance costs and other (income)/expense
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Taxation
|
|
|
2,831 |
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
3,790 |
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment result
|
|
|
2,343 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
2,557 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
5,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income for the period by segment Nine months
ended September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate | |
|
|
|
|
& | |
|
Gas & | |
|
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
Total | |
|
|
Production | |
|
Power | |
|
Oil Products | |
|
Chemicals | |
|
Other | |
|
Group | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Segment result IAS 14
|
|
|
18,686 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
10,829 |
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
(711 |
) |
|
|
30,499 |
|
Share of profit of equity accounted investments
|
|
|
3,394 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
5,734 |
|
Net finance costs and other (income)/expense
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
(159 |
) |
Taxation
|
|
|
11,200 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
3,208 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
14,427 |
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment result
|
|
|
10,677 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
9,154 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
21,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income for the period by segment Nine months
ended September 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate | |
|
|
|
|
& | |
|
Gas & | |
|
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
Total | |
|
|
Production | |
|
Power | |
|
Oil Products | |
|
Chemicals | |
|
Other | |
|
Group | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Segment result IAS 14
|
|
|
12,400 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
7,241 |
|
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
(623 |
) |
|
|
20,198 |
|
Share of profit of equity accounted investments
|
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
3,496 |
|
Net finance costs and other (income)/expense
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
Taxation
|
|
|
7,017 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
2,327 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
9,276 |
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment result
|
|
|
6,905 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
5,924 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
(692 |
) |
|
|
14,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Discontinued operations
Discontinued operations in the three and nine month periods
ended September 30, 2005 comprise the activities of Basell,
a jointly controlled Chemicals entity (Shell Group interest
50%), which has been held for sale
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-98
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
at fair value less costs to sell since the announcement in 2004
of a review of strategic alternatives regarding this venture.
The loss for the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2005 comprised an impairment at fair value
less costs to sell at September 30, 2005.
8. Implementation of IAS 32
and IAS 39 Financial Instruments
As described in Note 2, the impact on transition at
January 1, 2005 resulting from recognising at fair value
certain additional derivative contracts and unquoted securities,
and recognising preference shares as debt, was an increase in
total equity of $0.8 billion. This was reflected by
increases in assets and liabilities at January 1, 2005 as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ million | |
|
|
| |
Investments: financial assets
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
Non-current assets: deferred tax
|
|
|
5 |
|
Current assets
|
|
|
42 |
|
Non-current liabilities: deferred tax
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
Non-current liabilities debt
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preference share capital of $20 million was recategorised
as debt on January 1, 2005 on the adoption of IAS 32
and 39.
9. Share capital
Equity share capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept. 30 | |
|
Dec. 31 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Allotted, called up and fully paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royal Dutch Ordinary shares
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
Shell Transport Ordinary shares
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number of shares outstanding at September 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royal Dutch | |
|
Shell Transport | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Shares outstanding at September 30, 2005
|
|
|
2,069,520,000 |
|
|
|
9,603,350,002 |
|
Shares outstanding at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
2,074,400,000 |
|
|
|
9,624,900,000 |
|
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-99
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Non-equity share
capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept. 30 | |
|
Dec. 31 | |
|
Sept. 30 | |
|
Dec. 31 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Number of shares | |
|
|
|
$ million | |
Allotted, called up and fully paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
448 Priority
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
£1 First Preference Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
£1 Second Preference Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The preference share capital was recategorised as debt on
January 1, 2005 on the adoption of IAS 32 and 39.
10. Contingencies and
litigation
Shell Oil Company (including subsidiaries and affiliates,
referred to collectively as SOC), along with numerous other
defendants, has been sued by public and quasi-public water
purveyors, as well as governmental entities, alleging
responsibility for groundwater contamination caused by releases
of gasoline containing oxygenate additives. Most of these suits
assert various theories of liability, including product
liability, and seek to recover actual damages, including
clean-up costs. Some assert claims for punitive damages. As of
October 27, 2005, there were approximately 64 pending suits
by such plaintiffs that asserted claims against SOC and many
other defendants (including major energy and refining
companies). Although a majority of these cases do not specify
the amount of monetary damages sought, some include specific
damage claims collectively against all defendants. While the
aggregate amounts claimed against all defendants for actual and
punitive damages in such suits could be material to the Combined
Financial Statements if they were ultimately recovered against
SOC alone rather than apportioned among the defendants,
management of the Shell Group considers the amounts claimed in
these pleadings to be highly speculative and not an appropriate
basis on which to determine a reasonable estimate of the amount
of the loss that may be ultimately incurred, for the reasons
described below.
The reasons for this determination can be summarised as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
While the majority of the cases have been consolidated for
pre-trial proceedings in the United States District Court for
the Southern District of New York, there are many cases pending
in other jurisdictions throughout the U.S. Most of the cases are
at a preliminary stage. In many matters, little discovery has
been taken and many critical substantial legal issues remain
unresolved. Consequently, management of the Shell Group does not
have sufficient information to assess the facts underlying the
plaintiffs claims; the nature and extent of damages
claimed, if any; the reasonableness of any specific claim for
money damages; the allocation of potential responsibility among
defendants; or the law that may be applicable. Additionally,
given the pendency of cases in varying jurisdictions, there may
be inconsistencies in the determinations made in these matters. |
|
|
|
There are significant unresolved legal questions relating to
claims asserted in this litigation. For example, it has not been
established whether the use of oxygenates mandated by the 1990
amendments to the Clean Air Act can give rise to a products
liability based claim. While some trial courts have held that it
cannot, other courts have left the question open or declined to
dismiss claims brought on a products liability theory. Other
examples of unresolved legal questions relate to the
applicability of federal preemption, whether a plaintiff may
recover damages for alleged levels of contamination
significantly below state environmental standards, and whether a
plaintiff may recover for an alleged threat to groundwater
before detection of contamination. |
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-100
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
There are also significant unresolved legal questions relating
to whether punitive damages are available for products liability
claims or, if available, the manner in which they might be
determined. For example, some courts have held that for certain
types of product liability claims, punitive damages are not
available. It is not known whether that rule of law would be
applied in some or all of the pending oxygenate additive cases.
Where specific claims for damages have been made, punitive
damages represent in most cases a majority of the total amounts
claimed. |
|
|
|
There are significant issues relating to the allocation of any
liability among the defendants. Virtually all of the oxygenate
additives cases involve multiple defendants including most of
the major participants in the retail gasoline marketing business
in the regions involved in the pending cases. The basis on which
any potential liability may be apportioned among the defendants
in any particular pending case cannot yet be determined. |
For these reasons, management of the Shell Group is not
currently able to estimate a range of reasonably possible losses
or minimum loss for this litigation; however, management of the
Shell Group does not currently believe that the outcome of the
oxygenate-related litigation pending as of October 27, 2005
will have a material impact on the Shell Groups financial
condition, although such resolutions could have a significant
effect on periodic results for the period in which they are
recognised.
A $490 million judgment in favour of 466 plaintiffs in a
consolidated matter that had once been nine individual cases was
rendered in 2002 by a Nicaraguan court jointly against SOC and
three other named defendants (not affiliated with SOC), based
upon Nicaraguan Special Law 364 for claimed personal injuries
resulting from alleged exposure to dibromochloropropane
(DBCP) a pesticide manufactured by SOC prior to
1978. This special law imposes strict liability (in a
predetermined amount) on international manufacturers of DBCP.
The statute also provides that unless a deposit (calculated as
described below) of an amount denominated in Nicaraguan cordobas
is made into the Nicaraguan courts, the claims would be
submitted to the US courts. In SOCs case the deposit would
have been between $19 million and $20 million (based
on an exchange rate between 15 and 16 cordobas per US dollar).
SOC chose not to make this deposit. The Nicaraguan courts did
not, however, give effect to the provision of Special Law 364
that requires submission of the matter to the U.S. courts.
Instead, the Nicaraguan court entered judgment against SOC and
the other defendants. Further, SOC was not afforded the
opportunity to present any defences in the Nicaraguan court,
including that it was not subject to Nicaraguan jurisdiction
because it had neither shipped nor sold DBCP to parties in
Nicaragua. At this time, SOC has not completed the steps
necessary to perfect an appeal in Nicaragua and, as described
below, the Nicaraguan claimants have sought to enforce the
Nicaraguan judgment against SOC in the U.S. and in Venezuela.
SOC does not have any assets in Nicaragua. In 2003, an attempt
by the plaintiffs to enforce the Nicaraguan judgment described
above in the United States against Shell Chemical Company and
purported affiliates of the other named defendants was rejected
by the United States District Court for the Central District of
California because of improper service and attempted enforcement
against non-existent entities or entities that were not named in
the Nicaraguan judgment. The plaintiffs initially appealed this
decision but have subsequently withdrawn their appeal. SOC filed
a declaratory judgment action seeking ultimate adjudication of
the non-enforceability of this Nicaraguan judgment in the United
States District Court for the Central District of California.
This district court denied motions filed by the Nicaraguan
claimants to dismiss SOC claims that Nicaragua does not have
impartial tribunals, the proceedings violated due process, the
relationship between SOC and Nicaragua made the exercise of
personal jurisdiction unreasonable, and Special Law 364 is
repugnant to U.S. public policy because it violates due process.
A finding in favour of SOC on any of these grounds will result
in a refusal to recognize and enforce the judgment in the United
States. Several requests for Exequatur were filed in 2004 with
the Tribunal Suprema de Justicia (the Venezuelan Supreme Court)
to enforce Nicaraguan judgments. The petitions imply that
judgments can be satisfied with assets of Shell Venezuela, S.A.,
which was neither a party to the Nicaraguan judgment nor a
subsidiary of SOC, against whom the Exequatur was filed. The
petitions are pending before the Tribunal Suprema de Justicia.
As of October 27, 2005, eight additional Nicaraguan
judgments had been entered in the collective
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-101
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
amount of approximately $398.2 million in favor of 489
plaintiffs jointly against Shell Chemical Company and three
other named defendants (not affiliated with Shell Chemical
Company) under facts and circumstances almost identical to those
relating to the judgment described above. Additional judgments
are anticipated (including a suit seeking more than
$3 billion). It is the opinion of management of the Shell
Group that the above judgments are unenforceable in a U.S.
court, as a matter of law, for the reasons set out in SOCs
declaratory judgment action described above. No financial
provisions have been established for these judgments or related
claims.
Since 1984, SOC has been named with others as a defendant in
numerous product liability cases, including class actions,
involving the failure of residential plumbing systems and
municipal water distribution systems constructed with
polybutylene plastic pipe. SOC fabricated the resin for this
pipe while the co-defendants fabricated the raw materials for
the pipe fittings. As a result of two class action settlements
in 1995, SOC and the co-defendants agreed on a mechanism to fund
until 2009 the settlement of most of the residential plumbing
claims in the United States. Financial provisions have been
taken by SOC for its settlement funding needs anticipated at
this time. Additionally, claims that are not part of these class
action settlements or that challenge these settlements continue
to be filed primarily involving alleged problems with
polybutylene pipe used in municipal water distribution systems.
It is the opinion of management of the Shell Group that exposure
from this other polybutylene litigation pending as of
October 27, 2005, is not material. Management of the Shell
Group cannot currently predict when or how all polybutylene
matters will be finally resolved.
In connection with the recategorisation of certain hydrocarbon
reserves that occurred in 2004, a number of putative shareholder
class actions were filed against Royal Dutch, Shell Transport,
Managing Directors of Royal Dutch during the class period,
Managing Directors of Shell Transport during the class period
and the external auditors for Royal Dutch, Shell Transport and
the Royal Dutch/ Shell Group. These actions were consolidated in
the United States District Court in New Jersey and a
consolidated complaint was filed in September 2004. The
complaint asserted claims under the U.S. securities laws on
behalf of all purchasers of Royal Dutch and Shell Transport
securities between April 8, 1999 and March 18, 2004.
On August 9, 2005, the court ruled on motions to dismiss
filed by Shell and other defendants. These motions generally
addressed whether plaintiffs complaint sufficiently
alleges claims and should be allowed to proceed. First, the
court dismissed with prejudice the private plaintiffs
attempts to challenge Shells shareholder notifications
under section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The
court ruled that, as a non-U.S. private issuer of securities,
Shell is exempt from the provisions of section 14(a). Plaintiffs
may not attempt to replead these claims. Second, the court
dismissed all claims against seven of Shells current and
former managing and supervisory directors: non-executive
Chairman Aad Jacobs, Executive Committee member Malcolm Brinded,
Maarten van den Bergh, Mark Moody-Stuart, Steven Miller, Paul
Skinner and Harry Roels (the Dismissed Individuals).
The plaintiffs were given 30 days to try to file an
adequate complaint against these individuals. Third, the court
declined to dismiss plaintiffs remaining claims against
Shell, as well as the claims against its current Chief
Executive, Jeroen van der Veer, and three of its former
executive directors, Sir Philip Watts, Walter van de Vijver and
Judith Boynton. Fourth, the Court decided to permit the class
action plaintiffs to proceed with claims on behalf of non-US
purchasers of Shell securities who bought their shares on
markets outside the United States. Shell had argued that, in
this case, the jurisdiction of U.S. courts was limited to those
who purchased Shells shares on U.S. securities exchanges
or who are U.S. citizens. Finally, the court decided to dismiss
claims brought by shareholders who purchased Shell shares after
the January 9, 2004 announcement of the reserves
recategorisation and by shareholders who purchased shares during
the class period and still hold those shares. The court ruled
that the former group may attempt to replead their claims, but
the latter group will not.
On September 19, 2005, plaintiffs filed their Second
Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (the
Second Amended Complaint). The substantive
allegations remain unchanged from those in the earlier
complaint, except that plaintiffs dropped their section 14(a)
claims and their claims against the Dismissed Individuals. In
addition, the Second Amended Complaint does not name
Shells current Chief Executive, Jeroen van der Veer, as a
defendant, subject to plaintiffs reservation of the right
to rename him as a defendant in the
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-102
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
future. It reinstates claims on behalf of those who purchased
shares after the January 9, 2005 announcement of the
reserves recategorisation.
Shell has filed a motion for reconsideration on the issue of
jurisdiction over non-U.S. purchasers who bought their
securities on non-U.S. markets and, alternatively, a motion to
certify this issue for appeal to the United States Court of
Appeals for the Third Circuit. Plaintiffs have sought
reconsideration of the courts ruling dismissing with
prejudice the claims of those who still hold the shares of Royal
Dutch and Shell Transport that they purchased during the class
period. Because of uncertainties relating to the pending
reconsideration and/or certification motions and because of the
relatively early stage of the proceedings, the company is
currently unable to assess the impact of the ruling on the
litigation. Further, the case is at an early stage and subject
to substantial uncertainties concerning the outcome of material
factual and legal issues relating to the litigation. In
addition, potential damages, if any, in a fully litigated
securities class action would depend on the losses caused by the
alleged wrongful conduct that would be demonstrated by
individual class members in their purchases and sales of Royal
Dutch and Shell Transport shares during the relevant class
period. Accordingly, based on the current status of the
litigation, management of the Shell Group is unable to estimate
a range of possible losses or any minimum loss. Management of
the Shell Group will review this determination as the litigation
progresses.
Also in connection with the hydrocarbon reserves
recategorisation, a number of putative class actions were filed
on behalf of participants in certain employee benefit plans
sponsored by Shell Oil Company or one of its United States-based
affiliates alleging that Royal Dutch, Shell Transport and
various current and former officers and directors breached
various fiduciary duties to employee participants imposed by the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). These
suits were consolidated in the United States District Court in
New Jersey and a consolidated class action complaint was filed
in July 2004. The parties executed a settlement agreement in
July 2005 and, on August 31, 2005, the court approved the
settlement. The courts order has now become final. The
settlement agreement requires defendants to pay $90 million
to the settlement class, the court-appointed class
counsels out-of-pocket expenses (which totaled
$742,949.13), plus the costs incurred in providing notice of the
settlement to class members. The corporate defendants must also
require Shell Oil Company to adopt specific procedures regarding
the monitoring and training of individuals appointed to be ERISA
fiduciaries.
The reserves recategorisation also led to the filing of
shareholder derivative actions in 2004. The four suits pending
in New York state court, New York federal court and New Jersey
federal court demanded Shell Group management and structural
changes and sought unspecified damages from certain current and
former members of the Boards of Directors of Royal Dutch and
Shell Transport. On October 21, 2005, the United States
District Court for the District of New Jersey ruled that it
would approve the settlement in a forthcoming opinion. Terms of
the settlement include payment by the Shell Group of
$9.2 million in attorneys fees and expenses to
counsel for the derivative plaintiffs and the adoption and
implementation by the Shell Group of certain corporate
governance principles.
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) and UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) issued
formal orders of private investigation in relation to the
reserves recategorisation which Royal Dutch and Shell Transport
resolved by reaching agreements with the SEC and the FSA as
announced on August 24, 2004. In connection with the
agreement with the SEC, Royal Dutch and Shell Transport
consented, without admitting or denying the SECs findings
or conclusions, to an administrative order finding that Royal
Dutch and Shell Transport violated, and requiring Royal Dutch
and Shell Transport to cease and desist from future violations
of, the antifraud, reporting, recordkeeping and internal control
provisions of the US Federal securities laws and related SEC
rules, agreed to pay a $120 million civil penalty and
undertook to spend an additional $5 million developing a
comprehensive internal compliance program.
In connection with the agreement with the FSA, Royal Dutch and
Shell Transport agreed, without admitting or denying the
FSAs findings or conclusions, to the entry of a Final
Notice by the FSA finding that Royal Dutch
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-103
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
and Shell Transport breached market abuse provisions of the
UKs Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and the
Listing Rules made under it and agreed to pay a penalty of
£17 million. The penalties from the SEC and FSA and
the additional amount to develop a comprehensive internal
compliance program have been paid by Shell Group companies and
fully included in the Income Statement of the Shell Group for
the year 2004. The United States Department of Justice commenced
a criminal investigation but announced on June 29, 2005
that it had made a determination not to prosecute. Euronext
Amsterdam, the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets
(AFM) and the California Department of Corporations are
investigating the issues related to the reserves
recategorisation. The AFM have announced that their findings do
not give rise to any further action from their side at this
time. Management of the Shell Group cannot currently predict the
manner and timing of the resolution of these pending matters and
is currently unable to estimate the range of reasonably possible
losses from such matters.
Shell Group companies are subject to a number of other loss
contingencies arising out of litigation and claims brought by
governmental and private parties, which are handled in the
ordinary course of business.
The operations and earnings of Shell Group companies continue,
from time to time, to be affected to varying degrees by
political, legislative, fiscal and regulatory developments,
including those relating to the protection of the environment
and indigenous people, in the countries in which they operate.
The industries in which Shell Group companies are engaged are
also subject to physical risks of various types. The nature and
frequency of these developments and events, not all of which are
covered by insurance, as well as their effect on future
operations and earnings, are unpredictable.
11. Reconciliation from IFRS to
US GAAP
The Group adopted IFRS in 2005, which varies from US GAAP in
certain respects, with a date of transition of January 1,
2004 (see Note 13). The reconciliation at transition and
for 2004 and 2005 are in Note 11, 12 and 13. The
significant differences between IFRS and US GAAP are described
below.
Cumulative currency
translation differences (CCTD)
Under IFRS at January 1, 2004, the balance of CCTD of
$1,208 million was eliminated by transfer to retained
earnings. For US GAAP there is no change in the accounting for
CCTD and the before mentioned amount is included in accumulated
other comprehensive income. Equity at that date in total under
both IFRS and US GAAP was not impacted.
Joint ventures
Under IFRS incorporated joint ventures, in which the Group has a
liability proportionate to its interest are presented as equity
accounted investments. For US GAAP purposes, the Shell Group
proportionally combined these joint ventures until
December 31, 2004. As of January 1, 2005, these joint
ventures are presented as equity accounted investments under US
GAAP. This change has no impact on total equity or income.
Major Inspection
costs
Under IFRS major inspection costs are capitalised and are
amortised to income over the period until the next planned major
inspection. On a US GAAP basis prior to January 1, 2005,
the Group expensed these costs as they were incurred. From
January 1, 2005 such costs are capitalised and are
amortised to income over the period until the next planned major
inspection.
The cumulative effect of the change of policy
($554 million) has been included in US GAAP net income
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005. Consequently, the
related reconciling items between IFRS and US GAAP that
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-104
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
existed at December 31, 2004 do not exist any more. The
impact on income going forward is reflected in lower operating
costs and higher depreciation.
Financial instruments and
other derivatives contracts
The Shell Group adopted IAS 32 and IAS 39 as of
January 1, 2005, which requires certain unquoted equity
securities to be recognised at fair value. Under US GAAP
these are recognised at cost. This change in accounting has no
impact on the timing of recognition of income arising from these
investments.
From the same date, certain commodity contracts and embedded
derivatives that are not recognised under US GAAP are
recognised at fair value under IFRS.
Employee benefits
(a) Employee retirement
plans and other postretirement benefits
Under IFRS, all gains and losses related to defined benefit
pension arrangements and other post retirement benefits at the
date of transition to IFRS have been recognised in the 2004
opening balance sheet, with a corresponding reduction in equity
of $4,954 million. Under US GAAP these amounts are
amortized therefore equity under US GAAP at
September 30, 2005 is $4,786 million higher.
Under IFRS, the use of the fair value of pension plan assets
(rather than market-related value under US GAAP) to
calculate annual expected investment returns and the changed
approach to amortisation of investment gains/ losses can be
expected to increase volatility in income going forward as
compared to past IFRS and US GAAP results. Under
US GAAP, the pension charge for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2005 is $148 million higher (2004:
$115 million lower) and for the three month period ended
September 30, 2005 of $43 million higher (2004:
$47 million lower).
(b) Share-based
compensation
Under IFRS, share-based compensation awarded after
November 7, 2002 and not yet vested at January 1, 2005
is recognised as an expense based on fair value measurement. For
the US GAAP the Group has adopted SFAS 123R as of
January 1, 2005 using the modified prospective approach.
This will minimise the difference between US GAAP and IFRS
reporting. The remaining difference relates to share-based
compensation awarded but not yet vested and granted before
November 7, 2002, which under US GAAP is also
recognised as an expense, and the treatment of deferred tax on
share-based payments. Under IFRS deferred tax is re-measured
every reporting period and under US GAAP deferred tax is
estimated at grant date and not subsequently revised.
Under US GAAP until December 31, 2004 share based
compensation expense was recognised based on the intrinsic value
method, which required no recognition of compensation expense
for plans where the exercise price is not at a discount to the
market value at the date of the grant, and the number of options
is fixed on the grant date.
Impairments
Under IFRS an impairment is based on discounted cash flows.
Under US GAAP, only if an assets estimated
undiscounted future cash flows are below its carrying amount is
a determination required of the amount of any impairment based
on discounted cash flows. There is no undiscounted test under
IFRS.
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-105
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Reversal of
impairments
Under IFRS, a favourable change in the circumstance, which
resulted in an impairment of an asset other than goodwill, would
trigger the requirement for a redetermination of the amount of
the impairment and any reversal is recognised in income. Under
US GAAP, impairments are not reversed.
Other adjustments
Other reconciling items include: the reclassification between
line item allocations under IFRS which do not affect equity
compared with that shown under US GAAP; differences arising
from cumulative currency translation differences; presentation
of income from equity accounted investments; other differences
arising from IAS 12 Income Taxes and IAS 17 Leases.
Recent US GAAP accounting
pronouncements
On April 4, 2005, the FASB adopted FASB Staff Position FSP
FAS 19-1 that amends Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 19 (FAS 19), Financial Accounting
and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing Companies, to
permit the continued capitalization of exploratory well costs
beyond one year if (a) the well found a sufficient quantity
of reserves to justify its completion as a producing well and
(b) the entity is making sufficient progress assessing the
reserves and the economic and operating viability of the
project. The guidance in the FSP is required to be applied
prospectively as of the third quarter of 2005. Currently we do
not expect this to have a material impact on our financial
statements.
EITF Issue no. 04-13 Accounting for Purchases and
Sales of Inventory with the Same Counterparty, was
ratified in September, 2005 and requires buy/sell
contractual arrangements entered into after March 15, 2006,
or modifications or renewals of existing arrangements after that
date, to be reported net in the Statement of Income and
accounted for as non-monetary transactions; earlier adoption in
2005 is permitted. The Shell Group has implemented
EITF 04-13 with effect from July 1, 2005. The
implementation of EITF 04-13 does not create a GAAP
difference with the Shell Groups IFRS accounts.
In prior periods the Group has entered into buy/sell agreements
which, if reported net under EITF 04-13, would lead to a
reduction in revenue and cost of sales for the nine months to
September 30, 2005 of $15,720 million and
$15,749 million, respectively, (three months to
September 30, 2004: $6,422 million and
$6,407 million; nine months to September 30, 2004:
$18,089 million and $18,186 million) with no impact on
net income.
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-106
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Reconciliation of statement of income from IFRS to
US GAAP for Three months ended
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
benefits | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued | |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Reversals of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS | |
|
operations(1) | |
|
Reclassifications(2) | |
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
Impairments | |
|
Impairments | |
|
Other | |
|
US GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Sales proceeds
|
|
|
94,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
94,762 |
|
less: Sales taxes, excise duties and similar levies
|
|
|
18,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
76,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
76,480 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
60,704 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
60,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
15,731 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
15,496 |
|
Selling and distribution expenses
|
|
|
3,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
3,157 |
|
Administrative expenses
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
632 |
|
Exploration
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275 |
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
Share of profit of equity accounted investments
|
|
|
3,081 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3,082 |
|
Net finance costs and other income
|
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxation
|
|
|
15,042 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
14,801 |
|
Taxation
|
|
|
5,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
5,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
9,484 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
9,349 |
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income for the period
|
|
|
9,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
9,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to minority interest
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income attributable to shareholders of
Royal Dutch and Shell Transport
|
|
|
9,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
8,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-107
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Reconciliation of statement of income from IFRS to
US GAAP for Nine months ended
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
benefits | |
|
|
|
|
|
Major | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued | |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Reversals of | |
|
inspection | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS | |
|
operations(1) | |
|
Reclassifications(2) | |
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
Impairments | |
|
Impairments | |
|
costs | |
|
Other | |
|
US GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Sales proceeds
|
|
|
286,168 |
|
|
|
(1,374 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
284,825 |
|
less: Sales taxes, excise duties and similar levies
|
|
|
54,933 |
|
|
|
(726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
231,235 |
|
|
|
(648 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
230,618 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
188,733 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
188,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
42,502 |
|
|
|
(563 |
) |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
41,823 |
|
Selling and distribution expenses
|
|
|
9,462 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
9,430 |
|
Administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
1,757 |
|
Exploration
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
784 |
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
Share of profit of equity accounted investments
|
|
|
5,734 |
|
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
5,626 |
|
Net finance costs and other income
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxation
|
|
|
36,392 |
|
|
|
(720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
35,595 |
|
Taxation
|
|
|
14,427 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
14,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
21,965 |
|
|
|
(685 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
21,426 |
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(554 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(554 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income for the period
|
|
|
21,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
22,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to minority interest
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income attributable to shareholders of Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport
|
|
|
20,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
21,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The definition of activities classified as discontinued
operations differs from that under US GAAP. Under IFRS
equity accounted or other investments are not excluded from this
classification, but the activity must be a separate major line
of business or geographical area of operations. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2005, discontinued
operations have been assessed and presented in accordance with
FAS 144. Where new discontinued operations have been
identified in the current period, the disclosures have been
applied retrospectively. This is a 2005 event and does not
affect the combined financial statements of Royal Dutch and
Shell Transport for the year ended December 31, 2004. |
|
(2) |
Reclassifications are differences in line item allocation under
IFRS but do not affect income compared with that shown under US
GAAP. They mainly comprise impacts from reporting 1) all
jointly controlled entities |
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-108
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
|
using the equity method, 2) the results of equity accounted
investments on a single line (therefore after net finance costs
and tax), 3) accretion expense arising on asset retirement
obligations as net finance costs rather than as cost of sales,
and 4) research and development within cost of sales. |
Earnings per share under US GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months | |
|
Nine months | |
|
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ | |
Royal Dutch Petroleum Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
2.72 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
6.47 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
2.72 |
|
|
|
1.57 |
|
|
|
6.19 |
|
|
|
3.99 |
|
Discontinuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
2.71 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
6.45 |
|
|
|
4.11 |
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
2.71 |
|
|
|
1.57 |
|
|
|
6.17 |
|
|
|
3.98 |
|
Discontinuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Shell Transport and Trading Company Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
Discontinuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.91 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.87 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
Discontinuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Details of the number of shares used in these calculations are
contained in Note 1. Income from continuing operations is
adjusted for income attributable to minority interest.
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-109
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Reconciliation of balance sheet from IFRS to US GAAP as
at September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee | |
|
|
|
Reversals of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS | |
|
benefits | |
|
Impairments | |
|
Impairments | |
|
Other | |
|
US GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
85,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
86,015 |
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
4,361 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
4,688 |
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
equity accounted investments
|
|
|
17,138 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
16,945 |
|
|
|
financial assets
|
|
|
3,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(385 |
) |
|
|
2,851 |
|
|
Deferred tax
|
|
|
3,039 |
|
|
|
(991 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
2,251 |
|
|
Other long term assets
|
|
|
6,555 |
|
|
|
5,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
11,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,930 |
|
|
|
5,024 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
(516 |
) |
|
|
124,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
21,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,490 |
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
83,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
83,781 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
15,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
121,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
241,230 |
|
|
|
5,024 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
245,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
9,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
9,049 |
|
|
Deferred tax
|
|
|
12,411 |
|
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
13,967 |
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
13,132 |
|
|
|
(1,188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,279 |
) |
|
|
10,665 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
|
5,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,277 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
39,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
6,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
6,702 |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
86,284 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
86,335 |
|
|
Taxes payable
|
|
|
12,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
12,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,064 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
107,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
146,341 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
146,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,653 |
|
|
|
6,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to shareholders of Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport
|
|
|
88,279 |
|
|
|
4,786 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
92,755 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
6,610 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
94,889 |
|
|
|
4,806 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(7,074 |
) |
|
|
92,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
241,230 |
|
|
|
5,024 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
245,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-110
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income under US GAAP
comprises the following amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Currency translation differences
|
|
|
234 |
|
Unrealised gains on securities
|
|
|
1,083 |
|
Unrealised gains on cash flow hedges
|
|
|
692 |
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
(1,645 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,020 |
) |
|
|
|
|
An amount of $3.8 billion has been reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings
compared to the Royal Dutch and Shell Transport Combined
Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-111
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
12. |
Reconciliations from IFRS to US GAAP in 2004 |
Reconciliation of statement of income from IFRS to US GAAP
for Three months ended September 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee | |
|
Cumulative | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
benefits(3) | |
|
currency | |
|
|
|
|
|
Major | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued | |
|
|
|
| |
|
translation | |
|
|
|
Reversals of | |
|
inspection | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS | |
|
operations(1) | |
|
Reclassifications(2) | |
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
differences(3) | |
|
Impairments(3) | |
|
impairments(3) | |
|
costs(3) | |
|
Other | |
|
US GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Sales proceeds
|
|
|
89,006 |
|
|
|
(1,985 |
) |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
87,476 |
|
Less: Sales taxes, excise duties and similar levies
|
|
|
18,321 |
|
|
|
(690 |
) |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
70,685 |
|
|
|
(1,295 |
) |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
69,697 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
58,604 |
|
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
57,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
12,081 |
|
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
12,203 |
|
Selling and distribution expenses
|
|
|
3,110 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
3,026 |
|
Administrative expenses
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
525 |
|
Exploration
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302 |
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
Share of profit of equity accounted investments
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
1,841 |
|
Net finance costs and other income
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxation
|
|
|
9,387 |
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
10,069 |
|
Taxation
|
|
|
3,790 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
4,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
5,597 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
5,495 |
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income for the period
|
|
|
5,620 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
5,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to minority interest
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income attributable to shareholders of Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport
|
|
|
5,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
5,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The definition of activities classified as discontinued
operations differs from that under US GAAP. Under IFRS
equity accounted or other investments are not excluded from this
classification, but the activity must be a separate major line
of business or geographical area of operations. As a result, all
of the items presented as discontinued operations in 2004 and
2005 under US GAAP are included within continuing
operations under IFRS. |
|
(2) |
Reclassifications are differences in line item allocation under
IFRS but do not affect income compared with that shown under US
GAAP. They mainly comprise impacts from reporting 1) all
jointly controlled entities using the equity method, 2) the
results of equity accounted investments on a single line
(therefore after net finance costs and tax), 3) accretion
expense arising on asset retirement obligations as net finance
costs rather than as cost of sales, and 4) research and
development within cost of sales. |
|
(3) |
See Note 11. |
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-112
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Reconciliation of statement of income from IFRS to US GAAP
for Nine months ended September 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee | |
|
Cumulative | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
benefits(3) | |
|
currency | |
|
|
|
|
|
Major | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued | |
|
|
|
| |
|
translation | |
|
|
|
Reversals of | |
|
inspection | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS | |
|
operations(1) | |
|
Reclassifications(2) | |
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
differences(3) | |
|
Impairments(3) | |
|
impairments(3) | |
|
costs(3) | |
|
Other | |
|
US GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Sales proceeds
|
|
|
243,634 |
|
|
|
(5,448 |
) |
|
|
2,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
240,640 |
|
Less: Sales taxes, excise duties and similar levies
|
|
|
53,549 |
|
|
|
(1,981 |
) |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
190,085 |
|
|
|
(3,467 |
) |
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
188,152 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
157,901 |
|
|
|
(2,422 |
) |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
155,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
32,184 |
|
|
|
(1,045 |
) |
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
32,566 |
|
Selling and distribution expenses
|
|
|
9,046 |
|
|
|
(357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
8,734 |
|
Administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
1,641 |
|
Exploration
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,304 |
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392 |
|
Share of profit of equity accounted investments
|
|
|
3,496 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
4,695 |
|
Net finance costs and other income
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxation
|
|
|
23,726 |
|
|
|
(561 |
) |
|
|
2,127 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
25,333 |
|
Taxation
|
|
|
9,276 |
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
2,127 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
11,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
14,450 |
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
13,960 |
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income for the period
|
|
|
14,515 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
14,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to minority interest
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income attributable to shareholders of Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport
|
|
|
13,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
13,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-113
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Reconciliation of statement of income from IFRS to US GAAP
for the year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee | |
|
Cumulative | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
benefits(3) | |
|
currency | |
|
|
|
|
|
Major | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued | |
|
|
|
| |
|
translation | |
|
|
|
Reversals of | |
|
inspection | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS | |
|
operations(1) | |
|
Reclassifications(2) | |
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
differences(3) | |
|
Impairments(3) | |
|
impairments(3) | |
|
costs(3) | |
|
Other | |
|
US GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
Sales proceeds
|
|
|
338,756 |
|
|
|
(6,945 |
) |
|
|
3,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
335,621 |
|
Less: Sales taxes, excise duties and similar levies
|
|
|
72,370 |
|
|
|
(2,529 |
) |
|
|
1,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
266,386 |
|
|
|
(4,416 |
) |
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
264,281 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
223,259 |
|
|
|
(1,810 |
) |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
(730 |
) |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
221,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
43,127 |
|
|
|
(2,606 |
) |
|
|
2,170 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
43,272 |
|
Selling and distribution expenses
|
|
|
12,550 |
|
|
|
(448 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
12,233 |
|
Administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,548 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2,542 |
|
Exploration
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,823 |
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
553 |
|
Share of profit of equity accounted investments
|
|
|
5,015 |
|
|
|
(252 |
) |
|
|
1,420 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
5,653 |
|
Net finance costs and other income
|
|
|
(424 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
(476 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxation
|
|
|
31,659 |
|
|
|
(2,349 |
) |
|
|
2,894 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
(469 |
) |
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
32,250 |
|
Taxation
|
|
|
12,168 |
|
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
2,894 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
15,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
19,491 |
|
|
|
(1,968 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
(469 |
) |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
17,162 |
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
1,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income for the period
|
|
|
19,257 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
(469 |
) |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
18,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to minority interest
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income attributable to shareholders of Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport
|
|
|
18,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
(469 |
) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
18,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The definition of activities classified as discontinued
operations differs from that under US GAAP. Under IFRS
equity accounted or other investments are not excluded from this
classification, but the activity must be a separate major line
of business or geographical area of operations. As a result, all
of the items presented as discontinued operations in 2004 and
2005 under US GAAP are included within continuing
operations under IFRS. |
|
(2) |
Reclassifications are differences in line item allocation under
IFRS but do not affect income compared with that shown under
US GAAP. They mainly comprise impacts from reporting
1) all jointly controlled entities using the equity method,
2) the results of equity accounted investments on a single
line (therefore after net finance costs and tax),
3) accretion expense arising on asset retirement
obligations as net finance costs rather than as cost of sales,
and 4) research and development within cost of sales. |
|
(3) |
See Note 11. |
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-114
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Reconciliation of balance sheet from IFRS to US GAAP as at
September 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee | |
|
inspection | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS | |
|
Reclassifications(1) | |
|
benefits (a)(2) | |
|
costs(2) | |
|
Other(3) | |
|
US GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
85,357 |
|
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(630 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
85,907 |
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
4,338 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
4,668 |
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
equity accounted investments
|
|
|
20,709 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
20,759 |
|
|
|
financial assets
|
|
|
2,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
2,486 |
|
|
Deferred
tax(2)
|
|
|
3,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(541 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(797 |
) |
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
Employee benefit assets
|
|
|
1,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
7,270 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,648 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
4,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,477 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
5,084 |
|
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
(780 |
) |
|
|
127,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
16,866 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,879 |
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
37,898 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
38,123 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
3,948 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,712 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
58,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
181,189 |
|
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
5,084 |
|
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
(787 |
) |
|
|
186,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
9,638 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
9,468 |
|
|
Deferred
tax(2)
|
|
|
13,459 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
2,040 |
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
(908 |
) |
|
|
14,613 |
|
|
Employee benefit obligations
|
|
|
6,873 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(1,920 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4,983 |
|
|
Other provisions
|
|
|
5,525 |
|
|
|
(1,086 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
4,561 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,675 |
|
|
|
1,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
7,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,170 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
(777 |
) |
|
|
41,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
7,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
7,170 |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
38,399 |
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
39,726 |
|
|
Taxes payable
|
|
|
10,471 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,059 |
|
|
Employee benefit obligations
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other provisions
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
(1,105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,472 |
|
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
57,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
98,642 |
|
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
(785 |
) |
|
|
99,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,733 |
|
|
|
4,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to shareholders of Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport
|
|
|
77,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,001 |
|
|
|
(495 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
82,323 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
4,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(4,739 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
82,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,021 |
|
|
|
(510 |
) |
|
|
(4,735 |
) |
|
|
82,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
181,189 |
|
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
5,084 |
|
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
(787 |
) |
|
|
186,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Reclassifications are differences in line item allocation under
IFRS which do not affect equity compared with that shown under
US GAAP. They mainly comprise impacts from reporting all
jointly controlled entities using the equity method and separate
reporting of all provisions. |
|
(2) |
See Note 11. |
|
(3) |
Includes the impact of the effect of transition to IFRS on
cumulative currency translation differences. |
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-115
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Reconciliation of balance sheet from IFRS to US GAAP as at
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee | |
|
|
|
Reversals of | |
|
inspection | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS | |
|
Reclassifications(1) | |
|
benefits (a)(2) | |
|
Impairments(2) | |
|
impairments(2) | |
|
costs(2) | |
|
Other(3) | |
|
US GAAP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
87,918 |
|
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
(660 |
) |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
88,940 |
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
4,528 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
4,890 |
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
equity accounted investments
|
|
|
20,493 |
|
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(397 |
) |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
19,743 |
|
|
|
financial assets
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
2,748 |
|
|
Deferred tax
|
|
|
2,789 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(980 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
1,995 |
|
|
Employee benefit assets
|
|
|
2,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
8,278 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,490 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
4,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,397 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
4,747 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
(608 |
) |
|
|
(799 |
) |
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
130,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
15,375 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,391 |
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
37,473 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
38,063 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
9,201 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
9,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,049 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
62,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
187,446 |
|
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
4,747 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
(608 |
) |
|
|
(799 |
) |
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
193,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
8,858 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
8,600 |
|
|
Deferred tax
|
|
|
12,930 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
1,541 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
14,844 |
|
|
Employee benefit obligations
|
|
|
6,795 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(1,711 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
5,044 |
|
|
Other provisions
|
|
|
6,828 |
|
|
|
(1,227 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
5,709 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
2,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
8,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,211 |
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
42,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
5,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
5,762 |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
37,909 |
|
|
|
1,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
39,862 |
|
|
Taxes payable
|
|
|
9,058 |
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
9,885 |
|
|
Employee benefit obligations
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other provisions
|
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
|
(1,698 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,852 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
55,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
96,063 |
|
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
(227 |
) |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
97,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,309 |
|
|
|
5,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to Shareholders of Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport
|
|
|
86,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,954 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
(469 |
) |
|
|
(564 |
) |
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
90,545 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
5,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(5,318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
91,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,974 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
(469 |
) |
|
|
(579 |
) |
|
|
(5,024 |
) |
|
|
90,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
187,446 |
|
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
4,747 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
(608 |
) |
|
|
(799 |
) |
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
193,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Reclassifications are differences in line item allocation under
IFRS which do not affect equity compared with that shown under
US GAAP. They mainly comprise impacts from reporting all jointly
controlled entities using the equity method and separate
reporting of all provisions. The impact of the reclassification
to report all jointly controlled entities using the equity
method will also be reflected in the Supplementary
information Oil and Gas (unaudited) in the Shell
Groups 2005 Annual Report. |
|
(2) |
See Note 11. |
|
(3) |
Includes the impact of the effect of transition to IFRS on
cumulative currency translation differences. |
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-116
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
13. Transition to IFRS on
January 1, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee | |
|
inspection | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US GAAP | |
|
Reclassifications(1) | |
|
benefits (a)(2) | |
|
costs(2) | |
|
Other | |
|
IFRS | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ million | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
87,088 |
|
|
|
(1,350 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
86,281 |
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
4,735 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,393 |
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
equity accounted investments
|
|
|
19,371 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
19,179 |
|
|
|
financial assets
|
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
3,349 |
|
|
Deferred tax
|
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
3,063 |
|
|
Employee benefit assets
|
|
|
6,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,741 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
2,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,946 |
|
|
|
(1,498 |
) |
|
|
(4,436 |
) |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
120,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
12,690 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,677 |
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
29,013 |
|
|
|
(328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
28,687 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,117 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,820 |
|
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
43,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
169,766 |
|
|
|
(1,849 |
) |
|
|
(4,436 |
) |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
164,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
9,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
9,274 |
|
|
Deferred tax
|
|
|
15,185 |
|
|
|
(257 |
) |
|
|
(1,596 |
) |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
13,801 |
|
|
Employee benefit obligations
|
|
|
4,927 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
2,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,945 |
|
|
Other provisions
|
|
|
3,955 |
|
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
4,941 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,054 |
|
|
|
(1,838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
4,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,221 |
|
|
|
(1,043 |
) |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
38,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
10,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
10,575 |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
32,383 |
|
|
|
(1,553 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
30,815 |
|
|
Taxes payable
|
|
|
5,927 |
|
|
|
(561 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,366 |
|
|
Employee benefit obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
Other provisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,879 |
|
|
|
(806 |
) |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
48,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
88,100 |
|
|
|
(1,849 |
) |
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
87,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
3,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(3,410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to shareholders of Royal Dutch and Shell
Transport
|
|
|
78,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,918 |
) |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
73,535 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,408 |
|
|
|
3,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
78,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,918 |
) |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
3,242 |
|
|
|
76,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
169,766 |
|
|
|
(1,849 |
) |
|
|
(4,436 |
) |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
164,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Reclassifications are differences in line item allocation under
IFRS which do not affect equity compared with that shown under
US GAAP. They mainly comprise impacts from reporting all
jointly controlled entities using the equity method and separate
reporting of all provisions. The impact of the reclassification
to report all jointly controlled entities using the equity
method will also be reflected in the Supplementary
information Oil and Gas (unaudited) in the Shell
Groups 2005 Annual Report. |
|
(2) |
See Note 11. |
Unaudited Condensed Combined Interim Financial Report
F-117