sc13e3
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 13E-3
RULE 13e-3 TRANSACTION STATEMENT UNDER SECTION 13(e)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(Name of the Issuer)
Royal Dutch Shell plc
Shell Investments Limited
Shell Canada Limited
(Name of Person(s) Filing Statement)
Common Shares
(Title of Class of Securities)
822567103
(CUSIP Number of Class of Securities)
Michiel Brandjes
Company Secretary
Royal Dutch Shell plc
30, Carel van Bylandtaan
2596 HR The Hague
The Netherlands
+31 70 377 9111
Copy to:
William P. Rogers, Jr., Esq.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
CityPoint, One Ropemaker Street
London EC2Y 9HR
United Kingdom
+44 207 453 1000
(Name, Address, and Telephone Numbers of Person Authorized to Receive
Notices and Communications on Behalf of Person Filing Statement)
This statement is filed in connection with (check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
The filing of solicitation materials or an information statement
subject to Regulation 14A (§§240.14a-1 through 240.14b-2), Regulation
14C (§§240.14c-1 through 240.14c-101) or Rule 13e-3(c) (§240.13e-3(c))
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act). |
|
|
o
|
|
The filing of a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933. |
|
|
o
|
|
A tender offer. |
|
|
o
|
|
None of the above. |
Check the following box if the soliciting materials or information statement referred to in
checking box (a) are preliminary copies: o
Check the following box if the filing is a final amendment reporting the results of the
transaction: o
Calculation
of Filing Fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction Valuation |
|
|
Amount of Filing Fee |
|
|
$1,438,719,986* |
|
|
$287,744** |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
For purposes of determining the filing fee pursuant to Rule 0-11(b)(1) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the transaction value of the Shell Canada common shares to be
received by Royal Dutch Shell plc, assuming acceptance of the Offer by all holders of Shell Canada
Limited common shares and options in the United States, is calculated
as follows: multiplying (x) 38,016,118, the number of shares of Shell
Canada Limited held by shareholders in the U.S. or subject to options
held by persons in the U.S., by (y) CAD $45.00, the price to be paid
for the shares held by such shareholders, and (z) applying an
exchange rate of $0.8410 USD$/CAD$, the Federal Reserve Bank of New
Yorks noon buying rate for Canadian dollars on February 6,
2007. |
|
** |
|
The amount of the filing fee, calculated in accordance with Rule
0-11 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is
equal to 0.02% of the value of the transaction. |
Check the box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by §240.0-11(a)(2) and identify the
filing with which the offsetting fee was previously paid. Identify the previous filing by
registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. o
Amount previously paid: $
Form or registration no.:
Filing Party:
Date Filed:
This Schedule 13E-3 is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) by Royal
Dutch Shell plc, a public company limited by shares incorporated in England and Wales (Royal Dutch
Shell), Shell Investments Limited, a company organized under the laws of Canada (Shell
Investments) and Shell Canada Limited, a company organized under the laws of Canada (Shell Canada) with respect to the offer for the common shares (the Shares) of Shell Canada.
Capitalized terms used herein but not defined in this Schedule 13E-3 shall have the meanings
given to them in the Offer and Circular and the Directors
Circular attached as Exhibits (a)(1)(A)
and (a)(2), respectively, to this Schedule 13E-3.
Pursuant to General Instruction F to Schedule 13E-3, the information contained in the Offer
and Circular and the Directors Circular, including all schedules and annexes thereto, is hereby
expressly incorporated herein by reference in response to items 1 through 15 of the Schedule 13E-3
and is supplemented by the information specifically provided for herein.
Item 1. Summary Term Sheet (Regulation M-A Item 1001).
The information set forth in the section of the Offer entitled Summary is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 2. Subject Company Information (Regulation M-A Item 1002).
(a) Name and Address. The information set forth in the section of the Circular entitled Shell
Canada is incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Securities. The information set forth in the section of the Circular entitled Shell
Canada is incorporated herein by reference.
(c) Trading Market and Price. The information set forth in the section of the Circular
entitled Price Range and Trading Volume of Common Shares is incorporated herein by reference.
(d) Dividends. The information set forth in the section of the Offer entitled Dividends and
Distributions and in the section of the Circular entitled Dividends and Dividend Policy is
incorporated herein by reference.
(e) Prior Public Offerings. The information set forth in the section of the Circular entitled
Previous Distributions of Common Shares is incorporated herein by reference.
(f) Prior Stock Purchases. The information set forth in the section of the Circular entitled
Dividends and Dividend Policy is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 3. Identity and Background of Filing Person (Regulation M-A Item 1003).
(a) Name and Address. The information set forth in the sections of the Circular entitled The
Offeror and RDS and Shell Canada and the information set forth in Schedule B of the Circular is
incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Business and Background of Entities. The information set forth in the sections of the
Circular entitled The Offeror and RDS and Shell Canada is incorporated herein by reference.
(c) Business and Background of Natural Persons. The information set forth in the sections of
the Circular entitled The Offeror and RDS, Shell Canada and Securities Proceedings and the
information set forth in Schedules B and C of the Circular is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 4. Terms of the Transaction (Regulation M-A Item 1004).
(a) Material Terms. The information set forth in the sections of the Offer entitled The
Offer, Time for Acceptance, Manner of Acceptance, Conditions of the Offer, Extension and
Variation of the Offer, Take Up of and Payment for Deposited Common Shares, Dividends and
Distributions and Market Purchases, and the information set forth in the sections of the
Circular entitled Effect of the Offer on the Market for Common Shares; Stock Exchange Listing;
and Public Disclosure by Shell Canada, Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations and
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations is incorporated herein by reference.
(c) Different Terms. The information set forth in the section of the Offer entitled The
Offer is incorporated herein by reference.
(d) Appraisal Rights. The information set forth in the section of the Circular entitled
Acquisition of Common Shares Not Deposited is incorporated herein by reference.
(e) Provisions for Unaffiliated Security Holders. The information set forth in the section of
the Circular entitled Additional Information is incorporated herein by reference.
(f) Eligibility for Listing or Trading. Not applicable.
Item 5. Past Contacts, Transactions, Negotiations and Agreements (Regulation M-A Item 1005).
(a) Transactions. The information set forth in the section of the Circular entitled
Arrangements, Agreements or UnderstandingsRoutine Transactions and the information set forth in
the sections of the Directors Circular entitled Arrangements Between RDS or the Offeror and
Directors and Senior Officers of Shell Canada and Other Transactions is incorporated herein by
reference.
(b) Significant Corporate Events. The information set forth in the sections of the Circular
entitled Beneficial Ownership of and Trading in Securities and Arrangements, Agreements or
UnderstandingsContacts, Negotiations or Transactions is incorporated herein by reference.
(c) Negotiations or Contacts. The information set forth in the section of the Circular
entitled Arrangements, Agreements or UnderstandingsContacts, Negotiations or Transactions is
incorporated herein by reference.
(e) Agreements Involving the Subject Companys Securities. The information set forth in the
section of the Circular entitled Agreements Relating to the Offer and the information set forth
in the section of the Directors Circular entitled Support Agreement is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 6. Purposes of the Transaction and Plans or Proposals (Regulation M-A Item 1006).
(b) Use of Securities Acquired. The information set forth in the section of the Circular
entitled Special FactorsPurpose of, Alternatives to, Reasons for and Effects of the Offer and
Plans for Shell Canada is incorporated herein by reference.
(c) Plans.
The information set forth in the sections of the Circular entitled Special
FactorsPurpose of, Alternatives to, Reasons for and Effects of the Offer and Plans for Shell
Canada and Acquisition of Common Shares Not Deposited is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 7. Purposes, Alternatives, Reasons and Effects (Regulation M-A Item 1013).
(a) Purposes. The information set forth in the sections of the Circular entitled Background
to the Offer and Special Factors Purpose of, Alternatives to, Reasons for and Effects of the
Offer and Plans for Shell Canada is incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Alternatives.
The information set forth in the sections of the Circular entitled Special
Factors Purpose of, Alternatives to, Reasons for and Effects of the Offer and Plans for Shell
Canada is incorporated herein by reference.
(c) Reasons. The information set forth in the sections of the Circular entitled Special
Factors Purpose of, Alternatives to, Reasons for and Effects of the Offer and Plans for Shell
Canada is incorporated herein by reference.
(d) Effects. The information set forth in the sections of the Circular entitled Special
Factors Purpose of, Alternatives to, Reasons for and Effects of the Offer and Plans for Shell
Canada, Effect of the Offer on the Market for Common Shares; Stock Exchange Listing; and Public
Disclosure by Shell Canada, Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations and Certain U.S.
Federal Income Tax Considerations is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 8. Fairness of the Transaction (Regulation M-A Item 1014).
(a) Fairness. The information set forth in the sections of the Circular entitled Background
to the Offer, Special Factors Fairness of the Proposed Transaction, Special Factors CIBC
World Markets Valuation and CIBC World Markets Fairness Opinion and the information set forth in
the sections of the Directors Circular entitled Background to the Offer, Recommendation of the
Special Committee and the Board of Directors, Valuation and Fairness Opinion is incorporated
herein by reference.
(b) Factors Considered in Determining Fairness. The information set forth in the section of
the Circular entitled Reasons to Accept the Offer, Special Factors CIBC World Markets
Valuation and CIBC World Markets Fairness Opinion and the information set forth in the sections of
the Directors Circular entitled Recommendation of the Special Committee and the Board of
Directors and Valuation and Fairness Opinion is incorporated herein by reference.
(c) Approval of Security Holders. The information set forth in the section of the Offer
entitled The Offer is incorporated herein by reference.
(d) Unaffiliated Representatives. The information set forth in the section of the Directors
Circular entitled Background to the Offer is incorporated herein by reference.
(e) Approval of Directors. The information set forth in the section of the Directors Circular
entitled Recommendation of the Special Committee and the Board of Directors is incorporated
herein by reference.
(f) Other Offers. The information set forth in the section of the Circular entitled
Arrangements, Agreements or UnderstandingsContacts, Negotiations or Transactions and the
information set forth in the section of the Directors Circular entitled Prior Valuations is
incorporated herein by reference.
Item 9. Reports, Opinions, Appraisals and Negotiations (Regulation M-A Item 1015).
(a) Report, Opinion or Appraisals. The information set forth in the section of the Circular
entitled Special FactorsCIBC World Markets Valuation and CIBC World Markets Fairness
Opinion and the information set forth in the section of the Directors Circular entitled
Valuation and Fairness Opinion is incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Preparer and Summary of the Report. The information set forth in the sections of the
Circular entitled Special FactorsCIBC World Markets Valuation and CIBC World Markets Fairness
Opinion and the information set forth in the section of the Directors Circular entitled
Valuation and Fairness Opinion is incorporated herein by reference.
(c) Availability of Documents. The information set forth in the section of the Circular
entitled Additional Information and the information set forth in the section of the Directors
Circular entitled Valuation and Fairness OpinionThe Fairness Opinion is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 10. Source and Amounts of Funds or Other Consideration (Regulation M-A Item 1007).
(a) Source of Funds. The information set forth in the section of the Circular entitled Source
of Funds is incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Conditions. The information set forth in the section of the Circular entitled Source of
Funds is incorporated herein by reference.
(c) Expenses. The information set forth in the section of the Circular entitled Transaction
Expenses is incorporated herein by reference.
(d) Borrowed Funds. Not applicable.
Item 11. Interest in Securities of the Subject Company (Regulation M-A Item 1008).
(a) Securities Ownership. The information set forth in the section of the Circular entitled
Beneficial Ownership of and Trading in Securities and the information set forth in the sections
of the Directors Circular entitled Ownership of Securities by Directors and Senior Officers of
Shell Canada and Ownership of Securities of RDS or the Offeror is incorporated herein by
reference.
(b) Securities Transactions. The information set forth in the section of the Directors
Circular entitled Trading in Securities of Shell Canada and Issuance of Securities of Shell
Canada is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. The Solicitation or Recommendation (Regulation M-A Item 1012).
(d) Intent to Tender or Vote in a Going Private Transaction. The information set forth in the
sections of the Directors Circular entitled Recommendation of the Special Committee and the Board
of Directors and Intentions with Respect to the Offer is incorporated herein by reference.
(e) Recommendations of Others. The information set forth in the sections of the Directors
Circular entitled Recommendation of the Special Committee and the Board of Directors and
Intentions with Respect to the Offer is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Financial Statements (Regulation M-A Item 1010).
(a) Financial Information. The audited consolidated financial statements of Shell Canada for the years ended December 31,
2005, 2004 and 2003, and the related U.S. GAAP reconciliation, are incorporated by reference to
pages 61 through 82 of Exhibit 99.B and pages 33 through 35 of Exhibit 99.A, respectively, of Shell
Canadas Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 filed on March 13,
2006. The unaudited consolidated financial statements of Shell Canada for the quarter and year
ended December 31, 2006, are incorporated by reference to pages 24 through 38 of Exhibit 99.1 of
Shell Canadas Report on Form 6-K for the month of January 2007, furnished to the SEC on January 29, 2007. The information
set forth in the sections of the Circular entitled Financial Information and Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Net Book Value is incorporated herein by
reference.
(b) Pro Forma Information. Not applicable.
Item 14. Persons/Assets, Retained, Employed, Compensated or Used (Regulation M-A Item 1009).
(a) Solicitations or Recommendations. The information set forth in the section of the Circular
entitled Miscellaneous is incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Employees and Corporate Assets. The information set forth in the section of the Circular
entitled Miscellaneous is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 15. Additional Information (Regulation M-A Item 1011).
(b) Other Material Information. The Offer, Circular and Directors Circular in their entirety
are each incorporated herein by reference.
Item 16. Exhibits (Regulation M-A Item 1016).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)(1)(A)
|
|
Offer and Circular, dated February 8, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)(1)(B)
|
|
Letter of Transmittal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)(1)(C)
|
|
Notice of Guaranteed Delivery. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)(2)
|
|
Directors Circular, dated February 8, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)(A)
|
|
CIBC World Markets Inc. Valuation (incorporated by reference to
Schedule A of the Directors Circular dated February 8, 2007,
filed as Exhibit (a)(2)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)(B)
|
|
Fairness Opinion of CIBC World Markets Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Schedule B of the Directors Circular dated
February 8, 2007, filed as Exhibit (a)(2)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
Support Agreement dated as of January 23, 2007, between Shell
Canada Limited and Shell Investments Limited (incorporated by
reference to the Schedule 13D filed by Royal Dutch Shell plc on
January 26, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
Canada Business Corporations Act statutory appraisal rights. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
Not applicable. |
SIGNATURE
After due inquiry and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the undersigned certify that the
information set forth in this statement is true, complete and correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: February 8, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Michiel Brandjes |
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Michiel Brandjes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHELL INVESTMENTS LIMITED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/
Arnold MacBurnie |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
Arnold MacBurnie |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHELL CANADA LIMITED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/
Clive Mather |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
Clive Mather |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer |
|
|
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
Exhibit (a)(1)(A)
|
|
Offer and Circular, dated February 8, 2007. |
|
|
|
Exhibit (a)(1)(B)
|
|
Letter of Transmittal |
|
|
|
Exhibit (a)(1)(C)
|
|
Notice of Guaranteed Delivery. |
|
|
|
Exhibit (a)(2)
|
|
Directors Circular, dated February 8, 2007. |
|
|
|
Exhibit (b)
|
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
|
Exhibit (c)(A)
|
|
CIBC World Markets Inc. Valuation (incorporated by reference to Schedule A of the Directors Circular dated February 8, 2007, filed as Exhibit (a)(2)). |
|
|
|
Exhibit (c)(B)
|
|
Fairness Opinion of CIBC World Markets Inc. (incorporated by reference to Schedule B of the Directors Circular dated February 8, 2007, filed as Exhibit (a)(2)). |
|
|
|
Exhibit (d)
|
|
Support Agreement dated as of January 23, 2007, between Shell Canada Limited and
Shell Investments Limited (incorporated by reference to the Schedule 13D filed by
Royal Dutch Shell plc on January 26, 2007). |
|
|
|
Exhibit (f)
|
|
Canada Business Corporations Act Statutory appraisal rights. |
|
|
|
Exhibit (g)
|
|
Not applicable. |
exv99wxayx1yxay
This document is important
and requires your immediate attention. If you are in doubt as to
how to deal with it, you should consult your investment dealer,
stockbroker, bank manager, trust company manager, accountant,
lawyer or other professional advisor. The Offer (as defined
herein) has not been approved or disapproved by any securities
regulatory authority nor has any securities regulatory authority
passed upon the fairness or merits of the Offer or upon the
adequacy of the information contained in this document. Any
representation to the contrary is unlawful.
This document does not
constitute an offer or a solicitation to any person in any
jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is unlawful.
The Offer is not being made to, nor will deposits be accepted
from or on behalf of, holders of Shell Canada Limited common
shares in any jurisdiction in which the making or acceptance of
the Offer would not be in compliance with the laws of such
jurisdiction. However, the Offeror (as defined herein) may, in
its sole discretion, take such action as it may deem necessary
to extend the Offer to holders of Shell Canada Limited common
shares in any such jurisdiction.
Neither the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission nor any securities commission of any state
of the United States of America has approved or disapproved of
this transaction or passed upon the merits or fairness of this
transaction or upon the adequacy or accuracy of the information
contained in this document. Any representation to the contrary
is a criminal offense.
February 8, 2007
SHELL
INVESTMENTS LIMITED
a wholly-owned
indirect subsidiary of
ROYAL
DUTCH SHELL plc
OFFER
TO PURCHASE FOR CASH
all of the Common
Shares
of
SHELL
CANADA LIMITED
not already held
by Shell Investments Limited or its affiliates
at a price
of
Cdn. $45.00 per
Common Share in Cash
This offer (the Offer) by Shell Investments Limited
(the Offeror), a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of
Royal Dutch Shell plc (RDS), to purchase all of the
issued and outstanding common shares (the Common
Shares) in the capital of Shell Canada Limited
(Shell Canada), including all Common Shares which
may become outstanding on or after the date of this Offer and
prior to the Expiry Time (as defined below) upon the exercise of
Options (as hereinafter defined) or other rights to acquire
Common Shares, but excluding Common Shares already held by the
Offeror or its affiliates, will be open for acceptance until
8:00 p.m. (Toronto time), on March 16, 2007, unless
the Offer is extended or withdrawn by the Offeror (the
Expiry Time). The Offeror, together with its
affiliates, holds as of the date hereof 643,308,858 Common
Shares, representing approximately 78% of the currently issued
and outstanding Common Shares.
The Offer is subject to certain conditions, including there
being validly deposited or tendered under the Offer and not
withdrawn, at the Expiry Time, a number of Common Shares which
constitutes at least a majority of the aggregate number of
outstanding Common Shares (including, for this purpose, Common
Shares underlying any Options or other rights to acquire Common
Shares that are exercisable immediately prior to the Expiry
Time) not currently owned by the Offeror and its affiliates and
the votes attaching to which shall be qualified to be included
as votes in favour of any Subsequent Acquisition Transaction (as
hereinafter defined) in determining whether minority approval
(as construed under applicable securities Laws) has been
obtained in respect thereof (the Minimum Condition).
Each of the conditions of the Offer is set forth in
Section 4 of the Offer, Conditions of the Offer.
The board of directors of Shell Canada (the Board of
Directors), on the recommendation of a committee of
independent directors of Shell Canada (the Special
Committee), has concluded that the Offer is fair to
holders of Common Shares other than the Offeror or its
affiliates (Shareholders). The Board of Directors
recommends that Shareholders accept the Offer and tender their
Common Shares pursuant to the terms of this Offer. CIBC World
Markets Inc., the independent valuator and financial advisor to
the Special Committee, has provided an opinion to the Special
Committee that the consideration under the Offer is fair, from a
financial point of view, to Shareholders. The Board of Directors
has informed the Offeror that the directors of Shell Canada
intend to deposit pursuant to the terms of this Offer any
outstanding Common Shares owned by them before the Expiry Time.
For further information, see the accompanying Directors
Circular.
Shell Canada has entered into an agreement (the Support
Agreement) to use its commercially reasonable efforts to
assist the Offeror to complete the Offer. See Section 5 of
the Circular, Agreements Relating to the Offer.
The Common Shares are listed for trading on the Toronto Stock
Exchange (the TSX) under the symbol SHC.
The closing price of the Common Shares on the TSX on
October 20, 2006, the last trading day immediately prior to
the public announcement of RDS intention to make the
Offer, was $32.80. The Offer price of $45.00 per Common Share in
cash represents a premium of: 37.2% to the October 20, 2006
closing price of the Common Shares on the TSX; and 44.7% to the
average closing price of the Common Shares on the TSX for the
30 calendar days preceding and including October 20,
2006.
Shareholders who wish to accept the Offer must properly complete
and duly execute the accompanying Letter of Transmittal (printed
on blue paper) or a facsimile thereof and deposit it, together
with certificates representing their Common Shares, in
accordance with the instructions in the Letter of Transmittal.
Alternatively, Shareholders may follow the procedures for
guaranteed delivery set forth in Section 3 of the Offer,
Manner of Acceptance Procedure for Guaranteed
Delivery, using the accompanying Notice of Guaranteed
Delivery (printed on green paper) or a facsimile thereof.
Shareholders whose Common Shares are registered in the name of a
nominee should contact their broker, investment dealer, bank,
trust company or other nominee for assistance in depositing
their Common Shares to the Offer.
The Offer is made only for Common Shares and is not made for any
outstanding, unexercised Options or other rights to acquire
Common Shares. As described in a separate letter from Shell
Canada Options Corporation (SC OptionCo), Shell
Canada and RDS to holders of Options (the Option Exchange
Letter), holders of Options will be entitled, subject to
the obtaining of all necessary regulatory and other approvals
and the Offeror taking up and paying for Common Shares deposited
under the Offer in a number that satisfies the Minimum
Condition, to surrender their Options in exchange for options
issued by SC OptionCo (the Replacement Options) to
acquire Class A Ordinary shares in RDS. Holders of Options
who are considering exercising Options in order to participate
in the Offer are strongly urged to consult their own tax
advisors before doing so.
Questions and requests for assistance may be directed to CIBC
Mellon Trust Company (the Depositary), to
Morgan Stanley Canada Limited or Scotia Capital Inc. (together,
the Dealer Managers), or to Kingsdale Shareholder
Services Inc. (the Information Agent). Additional
copies of this document, the Letter of Transmittal and the
Notice of Guaranteed Delivery may also be obtained without
charge from the Dealer Managers, the Information Agent, or the
Depositary at their respective addresses shown below.
The Dealer Managers for the Offer are:
Morgan Stanley Canada Limited
Suite 3700, 181 Bay Street
Toronto, Ontario
M5J 2T3
- and -
Scotia Capital Inc.
Suite 1800, Scotia Centre
700
2nd
Street S.W.
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 2W1
The Information Agent for the Offer is:
Kingsdale Shareholder Services Inc.
The Exchange Tower
130 King Street West, Suite 2950
P.O. Box 361, Toronto, Ontario
The Depositary for the Offer is:
CIBC Mellon Trust Company
199 Bay Street
Commerce Court West
Securities Level
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
M5L 1G9
or
600 The Dome Tower
333 7th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 2Z1
NOTICE TO
SHAREHOLDERS IN THE UNITED STATES
The Offer is made for the securities of a Canadian issuer and
while the Offer is subject to applicable disclosure requirements
in Canada, Shareholders should be aware that such requirements
are different from those in the United States. Financial
information regarding Shell Canada included or referred to
herein has been derived from publicly available financial
statements which have been prepared in accordance with Canadian
generally accepted accounting principles and thus may not be
comparable to financial statements of United States
companies.
The enforcement by Shareholders of civil liabilities under
United States federal securities Laws may be affected adversely
by the fact that the Offeror is incorporated under the Laws of
Canada and that some or all of its officers and directors are
resident outside the United States, that certain of the Dealer
Managers, the Information Agent and the Depositary and most of
the experts named in the Circular are residents of Canada, and
that all or a substantial portion of the assets of the Offeror
and said Persons may be located outside the United States. The
enforcement by Shareholders of civil liabilities under United
States federal securities Laws may also be affected adversely by
the fact that Shell Canada is incorporated under the Laws of
Canada, that some or all of its directors are residents of
Canada and that all or a substantial portion of the assets of
Shell Canada and said Persons may be located outside the United
States.
Shareholders should be aware that the Offeror or its
affiliates, directly or indirectly, may bid for or make
purchases of Common Shares, or of any related securities of
Shell Canada, during the period of the Offer, as permitted by
applicable Canadian provincial or territorial Laws. See
Section 12 of the Offer, Market Purchases.
Shareholders in the United States should be aware that the
disposition of Common Shares by them pursuant to the Offer may
have tax consequences both in Canada and in the United States.
Such consequences may not be fully described herein and such
holders are urged to consult their tax advisors. See
Section 18 of the Circular, Certain Canadian Federal
Income Tax Considerations and Section 19 of the
Circular, Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax
Considerations.
All dollar references in the Offer and Circular are to
Canadian dollars, unless otherwise indicated.
On February 5, 2007, the noon rate of exchange as
reported by the Bank of Canada was $1.00 = U.S.$0.8462 and
$1.00 = £0.4317.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
The Offer and Circular contain forward-looking statements
concerning the financial condition, results of operations and
businesses of RDS, the Offeror and the Shell Group. All
statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may
be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements are statements of future expectations that are based
on managements current expectations, assumptions and other
factors and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ
materially from those expressed or implied in these statements.
Forward-looking statements include, among other things,
statements concerning the potential exposure of RDS, the Offeror
or the Shell Group to market risks and statements expressing
managements expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts,
projections and assumptions. These forward-looking statements
are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as
anticipate, believe, could,
estimate, expect, intend,
may, plan, objectives,
outlook, probably, project,
will, seek, target,
risks, goals, should and
similar terms and phrases. There are a number of factors that
could affect the future operations of RDS, the Offeror and the
Shell Group and could cause those results to differ materially
from those expressed in the forward-looking statements included
in the Offer and Circular, including (without limitation):
(a) price fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas;
(b) changes in demand for the Shell Groups products;
(c) currency fluctuations; (d) drilling and production
results; (e) reserve estimates; (f) loss of market and
industry competition; (g) environmental and physical risks;
(h) risks associated with the identification of suitable
potential acquisition properties and targets, and successful
negotiation and completion of such transactions; (i) the
risk of doing business in developing countries and countries
subject to international sanctions; (j) legislative, fiscal
and regulatory developments including potential litigation and
regulatory effects arising from recategorization of reserves;
(k) economic and financial market conditions in various
countries and regions; (l) political risks, project delay
or advancement, approvals and cost estimates; and
(m) changes in trading conditions. All forward-looking
statements contained in the Offer and Circular are expressly
qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements
contained or referred to in this section. Readers should not
place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Each
forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the
Offer and Circular. None of RDS, the Offeror, or any member of
the Shell Group undertakes any obligation publicly to update or
revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new
information, future events or other information. In light of
these risks, results could differ materially from those stated,
implied or inferred from the forward-looking statements
contained in the Offer and Circular.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CIBC WORLD MARKETS INC. VALUATION
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INFORMATION REGARDING THE
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF SHELL INVESTMENTS LIMITED
AND ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC
|
|
|
B-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INFORMATION REGARDING THE
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF SHELL CANADA LIMITED
|
|
|
C-1
|
|
2
SUMMARY
The following is a summary only and is qualified by the
detailed provisions contained elsewhere in the Offer and
Circular. Certain capitalized words and terms used in this
Summary are defined in the Glossary. Information concerning
Shell Canada contained in this summary and in the Offer and the
Circular has been taken from or is based on publicly available
documents or records on file with Canadian securities regulatory
authorities at the time of the Offer and information provided to
the Offeror by Shell Canada. Shareholders are urged to read the
Offer and Circular in their entirety. All currency amounts
expressed herein, unless otherwise indicated, are expressed in
Canadian dollars.
The
Offer
The Offeror is offering to purchase, upon the terms and subject
to the conditions described in the Offer, all of the issued and
outstanding Common Shares (including any Common Shares which may
become outstanding after the date of this Offer and prior to the
Expiry Time upon the exercise of Options or other rights to
acquire Common Shares) not already held by the Offeror or its
affiliates, at a price of $45.00 per Common Share in cash. Based
on the most recent publicly available information, as at
January 15, 2007 there were 825,662,514 Common Shares
outstanding (of which RDS indirectly owned 643,308,858 Common
Shares).
The Offer is open for acceptance until 8:00 p.m. (Toronto
time), on March 16, 2007, unless the Offer is withdrawn or
extended by the Offeror. See Section 2 of the Offer,
Time for Acceptance.
The Offer is made only for Common Shares and is not made for any
outstanding, unexercised Options or other rights to acquire
Common Shares. As described in a separate letter from SC
OptionCo, Shell Canada and RDS to holders of Options (the
Option Exchange Letter), holders of Options will be
entitled, subject to the obtaining of all necessary regulatory
and other approvals and the Offeror taking up and paying for
Common Shares deposited under the Offer in a number that
satisfies the Minimum Condition, to surrender their Options in
exchange for options issued by SC OptionCo (the
Replacement Options) to acquire Class A
Ordinary shares in RDS. Holders of Options who are considering
exercising Options in order to participate in the Offer are
strongly urged to consult their own tax advisors before doing so.
Recommendation
of Shell Canada Board of Directors
The Board of Directors, on the recommendation of the Special
Committee, has concluded that the Offer is fair to Shareholders.
The Board of Directors recommends that Shareholders accept the
Offer and tender their Common Shares pursuant to the terms of
the Offer. CIBC World Markets, the independent valuator and
financial advisor to the Special Committee, has provided an
opinion to the Special Committee that the consideration under
the Offer is fair, from a financial point of view, to
Shareholders. The Board of Directors has informed the Offeror
that the directors of Shell Canada intend to deposit pursuant to
the terms of the Offer any outstanding Common Shares owned by
them before the Expiry Time. For further information, see the
accompanying Directors Circular.
CIBC
World Markets Valuation and CIBC World Markets Fairness
Opinion
The Special Committee engaged CIBC World Markets to prepare a
formal valuation of the Common Shares in accordance with
Rule 61-501
and
Regulation Q-27,
and to provide the Special Committee its opinion as to the
fairness of the consideration under the Offer, from a financial
point of view, to Shareholders.
In the CIBC World Markets Valuation, CIBC World Markets
determined that, as of January 22, 2007, the fair market
value of the Common Shares was in the range of $42 to
$48 per Common Share. In the CIBC World Markets Fairness
Opinion which was provided to the Special Committee , CIBC World
Markets determined that, as of January 22, 2007, the
consideration under the Offer was fair, from a financial point
of view, to Shareholders. See Section 12 of the Circular,
CIBC World Markets Valuation and CIBC World Markets
Fairness Opinion, for a summary of the CIBC World Markets
Valuation. For a summary of the conclusion of the CIBC World
Markets Fairness Opinion see Section 12, CIBC World
Markets Valuation and CIBC World Markets Fairness Option.
The Offeror urges Shareholders to read in its entirety each of
the CIBC World Markets Valuation, included as Schedule A,
and the CIBC World Markets Fairness Opinion, which is included
as Schedule B to the Directors Circular.
Reasons
to Accept the Offer
The Offeror believes that the Offer price of $45.00 per Common
Share in cash is a full and fair price for the Common Shares
which it is seeking to purchase under the Offer. Shareholders
should consider a number of factors in making a decision whether
to accept the Offer. See Section 6 of the Circular,
Reasons to Accept the Offer.
3
The
Offeror and RDS
The Offeror was incorporated under the CBCA on November 5,
1996 under the name Shell Investments (1996) Limited and
changed its name to Shell Investments Limited on July 27,
2000 pursuant to articles of amendment. Prior to the date
hereof, the Offeror has not carried on any commercial activities
other than acting as a holding company, including owning
securities of Shell Canada and the making of the Offer. The
Offeror is a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of RDS. See
Section 1 of the Circular, The Offeror and RDS.
RDS was incorporated under the laws of England and Wales on
February 5, 2002, as a private company limited by shares
under the name Forthdeal Limited. On October 27, 2004, it
re-registered as a public company limited by shares and changed
its name to Royal Dutch Shell plc. RDS is a holding company
which owns, directly or indirectly, investments in the numerous
companies constituting the Shell Group.
In 2005, RDS became the parent company of Royal Dutch Petroleum
Company (Royal Dutch) and of The Shell
Transport and Trading Company, p.l.c. (Shell
Transport), the two former public parent companies of the
Shell Group. RDS, through the Shell Group, employs approximately
109,000 people.
The Shell Groups activities are conducted in more than 140
countries and territories and consist of the upstream businesses
of exploration and production and gas and power and the
downstream businesses of oil products and chemicals.
Collectively, these businesses refine, supply, trade and ship
crude oil products around the world and market fuels and
lubricants for domestic, industrial and transportation use. The
Shell Group also has interests in other industry segments such
as renewables, including wind, solar and hydrogen energy
products. See Section 1 of the Circular, The Offeror
and RDS.
Shell
Canada
Shell Canada was incorporated under the laws of Canada in 1925
as the successor to The Shell Company of Canada, Limited
(incorporated in 1911), and was continued under the CBCA on
May 1, 1978.
Shell Canada, a large integrated petroleum company in Canada,
operates principally in three industry segments:
(i) exploration and production, (ii) oil sands, and
(iii) oil products. The exploration and production segment
comprises exploration, production and marketing activities for
natural gas, natural gas liquids and sulphur. The oil sands
segment is responsible for an integrated bitumen mining and
upgrading operation and Shell Canadas in situ
business in Alberta. The oil products segment manufactures,
distributes and markets refined petroleum products across
Canada. See Section 2 of the Circular, Shell
Canada.
Purpose
of, Reasons for and Effects of the Offer and Plans for Shell
Canada
The purpose of the Offer is to enable the Offeror to acquire all
of the Common Shares not already held by the Offeror and its
affiliates. If the Offer is successful, upon the acquisition of
all of the outstanding Common Shares, RDS intends to integrate
further the business and operations of Shell Canada, thereby
further simplifying the Shell Group structure. Once Shell Canada
is fully integrated into the Shell Group, the overall business
is expected to benefit from a simplified organization,
additional economies of scale and portfolio development in the
context of the Shell Groups global strategy.
If permitted by applicable Law, subsequent to the completion of
the Offer and any Compulsory Acquisition or Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction, the Offeror intends to:
(i) de-list the Common Shares from the TSX; (ii) cause
Shell Canada to cease to be a reporting issuer for
purposes of relevant Canadian securities Laws; and
(iii) terminate the registration of Shell Canada under the
U.S. Exchange Act such that Shell Canada will no longer be
subject to the periodic reporting obligations of the U.S.
Exchange Act or otherwise be subject to the U.S. federal
securities Laws applicable to public companies. The effect of
these actions will be that Shell Canada will no longer be
required to file publicly, or to provide to security holders or
others, financial information or timely disclosure with respect
to its business and affairs and that the liquidity and market
value of any remaining Common Shares held by the public may be
adversely affected. See Section 7 of the Circular,
Purpose of, Alternatives to, Reasons for and Effects of
the Offer and Plans for Shell Canada.
Market
Price and Common Shares
The Common Shares are listed and posted for trading on the TSX
under the symbol SHC. The closing price of the
Common Shares on the TSX on October 20, 2006, the last
trading day immediately prior to the public announcement of
RDS intention to make the Offer, was $32.80. The Offer
price of $45.00 represents a premium of: 37.2% to the
October 20, 2006 closing price for the Common Shares on the
TSX; and 44.7% to the average closing price of the Common Shares
on the TSX for the 30 calendar days preceding and including
October 20, 2006.
4
Support
Agreement
Shell Canada has entered into an agreement with the Offeror (the
Support Agreement) to use its commercially
reasonable efforts to assist the Offeror to complete the Offer.
See Section 5 of the Circular, Agreements Relating to
the Offer.
Conditions
of the Offer
The Offeror has the right to withdraw the Offer and not take up
and pay for any Common Shares deposited under the Offer unless
all of the conditions described in Section 4 of the Offer,
Conditions of the Offer, are satisfied, or waived,
by the Offeror at or prior to the Expiry Time. Those conditions
include there having been validly deposited or tendered under
the Offer and not withdrawn, at the Expiry Time, a number of
Common Shares which constitutes at least a majority of the
aggregate number of outstanding Common Shares (including, for
this purpose, Common Shares underlying any Options or other
rights to acquire Common Shares that are exercisable immediately
prior to the Expiry Time) not currently owned by the Offeror and
its affiliates and the votes attaching to which shall be
qualified to be included as votes in favour of any Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction in determining whether minority approval
(as construed under applicable securities Laws) has been
obtained in respect thereof (the Minimum Condition).
See Section 4 of the Offer, Conditions of the
Offer.
Manner of
Acceptance
A Shareholder wishing to accept the Offer must deposit the
certificate(s) representing such Shareholders Common
Shares, together with the Letter of Transmittal (printed on blue
paper) or a facsimile thereof, properly completed and duly
executed, at or prior to the Expiry Time, at any one of the
offices of the Depositary specified in the Letter of
Transmittal. Instructions are contained in the Letter of
Transmittal which accompanies the Offer and Circular. A
Shareholder wishing to accept the Offer whose Common Shares are
held in the name of a nominee should request the broker,
investment dealer, bank, trust company or other nominee in whose
name such Common Shares are held to deposit such
Shareholders Common Shares. A Shareholder wishing to
accept the Offer whose certificates are not immediately
available, or who cannot deliver the certificates and all other
required documents to the Depositary at or prior to the Expiry
Time, may accept the Offer by following the procedures for
guaranteed delivery set forth in Section 3 of the Offer,
Manner of Acceptance Procedure for Guaranteed
Delivery.
Shareholders will not be required to pay any fee or commission
if they accept the Offer by transmitting their Common Shares
directly to the Depositary or if they utilize the services of
any member of the Soliciting Dealer Group to accept the Offer.
However, a broker or other nominee through whom you own your
Common Shares may charge a fee to deposit Common Shares on your
behalf. You should consult your broker or other nominee to
determine whether any charges will apply.
Withdrawal
of Deposited Common Shares
Common Shares deposited under the Offer may be withdrawn at any
time if the Common Shares have not been taken up by the Offeror
and in the other circumstances described in Section 6 of
the Offer, Withdrawal of Deposited Common Shares.
Payment
for Deposited Common Shares
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Offer, the
Offeror will take up and pay for Common Shares validly deposited
under the Offer and not withdrawn not later than 10 calendar
days after the Expiry Time. Any Common Shares taken up will be
paid for by the Offeror as soon as possible, and in any event
not more than three business days after they are taken up. Any
Common Shares deposited under the Offer after the first date
upon which Common Shares are taken up under the Offer will be
taken up and paid for within 10 calendar days of such deposit.
See Section 7 of the Offer, Take Up of and Payment
for Deposited Common Shares.
Acquisition
of Common Shares Not Deposited
If the Minimum Condition is satisfied, the Offeror currently
intends to acquire the remaining Common Shares pursuant to a
Compulsory Acquisition or a Subsequent Acquisition Transaction.
See Section 21 of the Circular, Acquisition of Common
Shares Not Deposited.
5
Certain
Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations
In general, a Resident Shareholder who holds Common Shares as
capital property and who sells those Common Shares to the
Offeror under the Offer will realize a capital gain (or capital
loss) equal to the amount by which the cash received, net of any
reasonable costs of disposition, exceeds (or is less than) the
aggregate adjusted cost base to the shareholder of those Common
Shares.
A Non-Resident Shareholder generally will not be subject to
Canadian income tax on any gain realized on a disposition of
Common Shares to the Offeror under the Offer unless those Common
Shares constitute taxable Canadian property within
the meaning of the Tax Act and the gain is not otherwise exempt
from tax under the Tax Act pursuant to the provisions of an
applicable income tax treaty or convention.
The foregoing is only a brief summary of Canadian federal
income tax consequences and is qualified by the more detailed
general description in Section 18 of the Circular,
Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations.
Shareholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors to
determine the particular tax consequences to them of a sale of
Common Shares pursuant to the Offer or a Compulsory Acquisition
or a disposition of Common Shares pursuant to any Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction.
Certain
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
If a U.S. Holder accepts and participates in the Offer, the U.S.
Holder will recognize gain or loss in an amount equal to the
difference, if any, between (i) the cash proceeds of the
Offer and (ii) the adjusted tax basis of the U.S. Holder in
the Common Shares exchanged. The gain or loss generally will be
U.S. source capital gain or loss, and will be long term capital
gain or loss if the Common Shares have been held for more than
one year, subject to rules with respect to Passive Foreign
Investment Companies.
The foregoing is only a brief summary of U.S. federal income
tax consequences for U.S. Holders and is qualified by the more
detailed general description in Section 19 of the Circular,
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.
Shareholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors to
determine the particular tax consequences to them of a sale of
Common Shares pursuant to the Offer or a Compulsory Acquisition
or a disposition of Common Shares pursuant to any Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction.
Depositary
CIBC Mellon Trust Company is acting as depositary (the
Depositary) under the Offer and will receive
deposits of certificates representing Common Shares and
accompanying Letters of Transmittal at the offices specified in
the Letter of Transmittal. The Depositary will receive Notices
of Guaranteed Delivery at the office specified in the Notice of
Guaranteed Delivery. See Section 22 of the Circular,
Dealer Managers and Depositary.
Dealer
Managers and Soliciting Dealer Group
Morgan Stanley Canada Limited and Scotia Capital Inc. have been
retained as Dealer Managers for the Offer. The Dealer Managers
will solicit acceptances of the Offer and will form the
Soliciting Dealer Group to solicit acceptances of the Offer. See
Section 22 of the Circular, Dealer Managers and
Depositary.
Information
Agent
Kingsdale Shareholder Services Inc. has been retained as
Information Agent for the Offer. In addition to contacting the
Dealer Managers, Shareholders with any questions or who
otherwise need assistance may contact the Information Agent at
the following address and telephone numbers:
Kingsdale Shareholder Services Inc.
The Exchange Tower
130 King Street West, Suite 2950
P.O. Box 361, Toronto, Ontario
Shareholders Call Toll Free:
1(866) 851-4179 (English and French)
Banks and Brokers Call Collect:
(416) 867-2272
6
GLOSSARY
In the Offer and Circular, unless the subject matter or
context is inconsistent therewith, the following terms have the
meanings set forth below.
affiliate has the meaning ascribed thereto in
the CBCA.
Agents Message means a message,
transmitted by DTC (in accordance with the provisions of the DTC
Automated Tender Offer Program (ATOP) Agents Procedures) to, and
received by, the Depositary and forming part of a Book-Entry
Confirmation, which states that DTC has received an express
acknowledgement from the participant in DTC depositing the
Shares which are the subject of such Book-Entry Confirmation
that such participant has received and agrees to be bound by the
terms of the Letter of Transmittal as if executed by such
participant and that the Offeror may enforce such agreement
against such participant.
AMF means lAutorité des
marchés financiers du Québec.
Appointee has the meaning ascribed thereto in
Section 3 of the Offer, Manner of
Acceptance Power of Attorney.
Board of Directors means the board of
directors of Shell Canada.
Book-Entry Confirmation means a confirmation
of a book-entry transfer of a Shareholders Common Shares
into the Depositarys account at CDS or DTC, as applicable.
Canadian GAAP means Canadian generally
accepted accounting principles.
CBCA means the Canada Business
Corporations Act.
CDS means The Canadian Depository for
Securities Limited.
CDSX means the CDS on-line tendering system
pursuant to which book-entry transfers may be effected.
CIBC has the meaning ascribed thereto in
Section 12 of the Circular, CIBC World Markets
Valuation and CIBC World Markets Fairness Opinion
Relationships with Interested Parties.
CIBC World Markets means CIBC World Markets
Inc.
CIBC World Markets Fairness Opinion means the
opinion of CIBC World Markets addressed to the Special Committee
and dated January 22, 2007 which is included as
Schedule B to the Directors Circular.
CIBC World Markets Valuation means the
independent formal valuation report of CIBC World Markets
addressed to the Special Committee and dated January 22,
2007 which is attached hereto as Schedule A.
Circular means the take-over bid circular
accompanying the Offer and forming part of the Offer.
Commercial Paper Programmes has the meaning
ascribed thereto in Section 8 of the Circular, Source
of Funds.
Common Shares means common shares in the
capital of Shell Canada as constituted on the date hereof.
Compelled Acquisition has the meaning
ascribed thereto in Section 21 of the Circular,
Acquisition of Common Shares Not Deposited
Compelled Acquisition.
Compulsory Acquisition has the meaning
ascribed thereto in Section 21 of the Circular,
Acquisition of Common Shares Not Deposited
Compulsory Acquisition.
CRA means the Canada Revenue Agency.
Dealer Managers means Morgan Stanley Canada
Limited and Scotia Capital Inc.
Deposit Period means the period commencing on
the date hereof and ending at the Expiry Time.
Depositary means CIBC Mellon
Trust Company.
Deposited Securities has the meaning ascribed
thereto in Section 3 of the Offer, Manner of
Acceptance Dividends and Distributions.
Directors Circular means the
accompanying directors circular dated February 8,
2007, as prepared by and on behalf of the Board of Directors.
7
Dissenting Offeree has the meaning ascribed
thereto in Section 21 of the Circular, Acquisition of
Common Shares Not Deposited Compulsory
Acquisition.
Distributions has the meaning ascribed
thereto in Section 3 of the Offer, Manner of
Acceptance Dividends and Distributions.
DTC means The Depository Trust Company.
Effective Date has the meaning ascribed
thereto in Section 7 of the Circular, Purpose of,
Alternatives to, Reasons for and Effects of the Offer and Plans
for Shell Canada.
Eligible Institution means a Canadian
Schedule I chartered bank, a major trust company in Canada,
a member of the Securities Transfer Agents Medallion Program
(STAMP), a member of the Stock Exchange Medallion Program (SEMP)
or a member of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Medallion
Signature Program (MSP).
Engagement Letter has the meaning ascribed
thereto in Section 12 of the Circular, CIBC World
Markets Valuation and CIBC World Markets Fairness Opinion.
Expiry Time means 8:00 p.m., Toronto
time, on March 16, 2007, or such later time and date as may
be fixed by the Offeror from time to time pursuant to
Section 5 of the Offer, Extension and Variation of
the Offer.
Governmental Entity means (i) any
international, multinational, national, federal, provincial,
state, municipal, local or other governmental or public
department, central bank, court, commission, board, bureau,
agency or instrumentality, domestic or foreign, (ii) any
subdivision or authority of any of the foregoing, or
(iii) any quasi-governmental or private body, including any
stock exchange, exercising any regulatory, expropriation or
taxing authority, under or for the account of any of the above.
IFRS means international financial reporting
standards.
Information Agent means Kingsdale Shareholder
Services Inc.
Law means any and all applicable laws,
whether local, domestic, regional, provincial, federal, state,
foreign and international, including all statutes, codes,
ordinances, orders, decrees, rules, regulations, municipal
by-laws, judicial or arbitral or administrative or ministerial
or departmental or regulatory judgments, decisions, rulings or
awards, policies, guidelines, including, any and all by-laws,
rules, regulations, policies, guidelines, orders, decisions,
rulings or awards of any Governmental Entity and any applicable
stock exchange and self-regulatory organization and general
principles of common and civil law and equity, binding on or
affecting the Person referred to in the context in which this
word is used.
Letter of Transmittal means the letter of
acceptance and transmittal in the form printed on blue paper
accompanying the Offer and Circular.
LTIP means the Long Term Incentive Plan of
Shell Canada, as amended from time to time.
Material Adverse Effect means, when used in
connection with a Person, any change or effect that is, or would
reasonably be expected to be, material and adverse to the
condition (financial or otherwise), properties, assets,
liabilities (whether absolute, accrued, conditional or
otherwise), obligations, business, operations, or results of
operations of that Person, its subsidiaries and its material
joint ventures taken as a whole, other than any effect:
(i) relating to the Canadian and United States economies
and political conditions generally; (ii) affecting the oil
and gas industry in general; (iii) relating to general
economic, financial, currency exchange, securities or commodity
market conditions in North America, including changes in
currency exchange or interest rates; (iv) relating to
changes in the market price of crude oil, bitumen or natural gas
on a current or forward basis; (v) reasonably attributable
to the announcement of the Support Agreement or the transactions
contemplated thereby, including any change in the trading price
of the Common Shares; and (vi) relating to any generally
applicable changes in applicable Laws (other than orders,
decisions, declarations, rulings, directions, prospects, or
decrees against that Person); provided that for the purposes of
clauses (ii) and (iv) such effect does not primarily
relate to (or have the effect of primarily relating only to)
that Person, its subsidiaries or material joint ventures, or
disproportionately adversely affect that Person, its
subsidiaries or material joint ventures compared to other
companies of similar size operating in the industry in which
that Person, its subsidiaries or material joint ventures operate.
Minimum Condition has the meaning ascribed
thereto in paragraph (a) of Section 4 of the Offer,
Conditions of the Offer.
8
Non-Resident Shareholder has the meaning
ascribed thereto in Section 18 of the Circular,
Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations
Shareholders Not Resident in Canada.
Notice of Guaranteed Delivery means the
notice of guaranteed delivery in the form printed on green paper
accompanying the Offer and Circular.
Offer means the offer to purchase Common
Shares made to Shareholders, the terms and conditions of which
are set forth in the Offer, the Circular, the Letter of
Transmittal and the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery.
Offeror means Shell Investments Limited, a
corporation incorporated under the CBCA.
Offerors Notice has the meaning
ascribed thereto in Section 21 of the Circular,
Acquisition of Common Shares Not Deposited
Compulsory Acquisition.
Option Exchange Letter has the meaning
ascribed thereto in Section 1 of the Offer, The
Offer.
Options means any options to purchase Common
Shares under the LTIP.
OSC means the Ontario Securities Commission.
Person means a natural person (including in
such persons capacity as trustee, executor, administrator
or other legal representative), sole proprietorship,
partnership, limited partnership, limited liability partnership,
corporation, body corporate, company, limited liability
corporation, unlimited liability company, joint stock company,
trust, unincorporated association, joint venture or other entity
or Governmental Entity, and pronouns have a similarly extended
meaning.
Proposal has the meaning ascribed thereto in
Section 4 of the Circular, Background to the
Offer Chronology of Events.
Purchased Securities has the meaning ascribed
thereto in Section 3 of the Offer, Manner of
Acceptance Power of Attorney.
RDS means Royal Dutch Shell plc, a
corporation incorporated under the laws of England and Wales.
Redeemable Shares has the meaning ascribed
thereto in Section 18 of the Circular, Certain
Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations
Shareholders Resident in Canada Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction.
Regulation Q-27
means
Regulation Q-27
of the AMF, as amended.
Replacement Options has the meaning ascribed
thereto in Section 1 of the Offer, The Offer.
Resident Shareholder has the meaning ascribed
thereto in Section 18 of the Circular, Certain
Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations
Shareholders Resident in Canada.
Royal Dutch has the meaning ascribed thereto
in Section 1 of the Circular, The Offeror and
RDS.
Rule 61-501
means
Rule 61-501
of the OSC, as amended.
Rules has the meaning ascribed thereto in
Section 12 of the Circular, CIBC World Markets
Valuation and CIBC World Markets Fairness Opinion
Selection of CIBC World Markets.
SC OptionCo means Shell Canada Options
Corporation, a corporation incorporated under the CBCA.
SEC means the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Shareholder means a holder of Common Shares,
other than the Offeror or its affiliates.
Shell Canada means Shell Canada Limited, a
corporation continued under the CBCA.
Shell Canada Information has the meaning
ascribed thereto in Section 12 of the Circular, CIBC
World Markets Valuation and CIBC World Markets Fairness
Opinion.
Shell Group refers to the companies in which
RDS, either directly or indirectly, has control by having either
a majority of the voting rights or the right to exercise a
controlling influence. The companies in which RDS directly or
indirectly owns investments, including Shell Canada, are
separate and distinct entities. However, in the Offer and the
Circular Shell Group is sometimes used for
convenience in contexts where reference is made to companies in
the Shell Group in general
9
and, shall include, unless the context otherwise requires, Shell
Canada. This expression is also used where no specific purpose
is served by identifying a particular company or companies.
Shell Transport has the meaning ascribed
thereto in Section 1 of the Circular, The Offeror and
RDS.
Soliciting Dealer has the meaning ascribed
thereto in Section 22 of the Circular, Dealer
Managers and Depositary.
Soliciting Dealer Group means the group of
Soliciting Dealers formed by the Dealer Managers to solicit
acceptances of the Offer.
Special Committee has the meaning ascribed
thereto in Section 4 of the Circular, Background to
the Offer.
Special Shares has the meaning ascribed
thereto in Section 18 of the Circular, Certain
Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations.
Subsequent Acquisition Transaction has the
meaning ascribed thereto in Section 21 of the Circular,
Acquisition of Common Shares Not Deposited
Subsequent Acquisition Transaction.
subsidiary has the meaning ascribed thereto
in the CBCA.
Support Agreement means the support agreement
between the Offeror and Shell Canada dated January 23, 2007.
Tax Act means the Income Tax Act
(Canada) and regulations promulgated thereunder, as amended.
TSX means the Toronto Stock Exchange.
U.S. Exchange Act means the United States
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
U.S. GAAP means United States generally
accepted accounting principles.
U.S. Holder has the meaning ascribed thereto
in Section 19 of the Circular, Certain U.S. Federal
Income Tax Considerations.
10
OFFER
Capitalized terms used in this Offer, where not otherwise
defined herein, are defined in the Glossary.
February 8,
2007
|
|
TO:
|
THE
HOLDERS OF COMMON SHARES IN THE CAPITAL OF SHELL CANADA
LIMITED
|
The Offeror is offering to purchase, upon the terms and subject
to the conditions described in this Offer, all of the issued and
outstanding Common Shares, including all Common Shares which may
become outstanding on or after the date of this Offer and prior
to the Expiry Time upon the exercise of Options or other rights
to acquire Common Shares, but excluding Common Shares already
held by the Offeror or its affiliates, at a price of $45.00 per
Common Share in cash.
The Offer is made only for Common Shares and is not made for any
outstanding, unexercised Options or other rights to acquire
Common Shares. As described in a separate letter from SC
OptionCo, Shell Canada and RDS to holders of Options (the
Option Exchange Letter), holders of Options will be
entitled, subject to the obtaining of all necessary regulatory
and other approvals and the Offeror taking up and paying for
Common Shares deposited under the Offer in a number that
satisfies the Minimum Condition, to surrender their Options in
exchange for options issued by SC OptionCo (the
Replacement Options) to acquire Class A
Ordinary shares in RDS. Holders of Options who are considering
exercising Options in order to participate in the Offer are
strongly urged to consult their own tax advisors before doing
so. The transaction proposed herein does not require the
approval of unaffiliated security holders of Shell Canada.
The accompanying Circular, Letter of Transmittal and Notice
of Guaranteed Delivery, which are incorporated into and form
part of this Offer, contain important information which should
be read carefully before making a decision with respect to this
Offer.
The Offer is open for acceptance from the date hereof until the
Expiry Time, being 8:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on
March 16, 2007, unless this Offer is withdrawn or extended
by the Offeror. The Expiry Time may be extended at the
Offerors sole discretion.
Letter
of Transmittal
The Offer may be accepted by delivering the following documents
to the Depositary at any of the offices of the Depositary listed
in the Letter of Transmittal accompanying this Offer and
Circular so as to arrive there not later than the Expiry Time:
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
the certificate(s) representing the Common Shares in respect of
which this Offer is being accepted;
|
|
|
(b)
|
a Letter of Transmittal (printed on blue paper) in the form
accompanying this Offer and Circular or a facsimile thereof,
properly completed and duly executed as required by the
instructions set out in the Letter of Transmittal; and
|
|
|
(c)
|
any other document required by the instructions set out in the
Letter of Transmittal.
|
Participants in CDS or DTC should contact the Depositary with
respect to the deposit of their Common Shares under this Offer.
CDS and DTC will be issuing instructions to their participants
as to the method of depositing Common Shares under the terms of
this Offer.
This Offer will be deemed to be accepted only if the Depositary
has actually received these documents at or prior to the Expiry
Time. Except as otherwise provided in the instructions set out
in the Letter of Transmittal or as may be permitted by the
Offeror, the signature on the Letter of Transmittal must be
guaranteed by an Eligible Institution. If a Letter of
Transmittal is executed by a Person other than the registered
holder of the Common Shares represented by the certificate(s)
deposited therewith, then the certificate(s) must be endorsed,
or be accompanied by an appropriate share transfer power of
attorney duly and properly completed by, the registered holder,
with the signature on the endorsement panel or share transfer
power of attorney guaranteed by an Eligible Institution.
In addition, Common Shares may be deposited in compliance with
the procedure set forth below for guaranteed delivery.
11
Procedure
for Guaranteed Delivery
If a Shareholder wishes to deposit Common Shares pursuant to
this Offer and the certificates representing such Common Shares
are not immediately available or the Shareholder is not able to
deliver the certificates and all other required documents to the
Depositary at or prior to the Expiry Time, such Common Shares
may nevertheless be deposited under this Offer provided that all
of the following conditions are met:
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
the deposit is made by or through an Eligible Institution;
|
|
|
(b)
|
a Notice of Guaranteed Delivery (printed on green paper) in the
form accompanying this Offer and Circular or a facsimile
thereof, properly completed and duly executed, including a
guarantee by an Eligible Institution in the form specified in
the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery, is received by the Depositary
at its office in Toronto, Ontario, Canada as set out in the
Notice of Guaranteed Delivery, at or prior to the Expiry Time;
and
|
|
|
(c)
|
the certificate(s) representing deposited Common Shares in
proper form for transfer together with a Letter of Transmittal
in the form accompanying this Offer and Circular or a facsimile
thereof, properly completed and duly executed, with any required
signature guarantees and all other documents required by the
Letter of Transmittal, are received by the Depositary at its
office in Toronto, Ontario, Canada as set out in the Notice of
Guaranteed Delivery prior to 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on
the third trading day on the TSX after the Expiry Time.
|
The Notice of Guaranteed Delivery may be delivered by hand or
transmitted by facsimile or mail to the Depositary at its office
in Toronto, Ontario, Canada as set out in the Notice of
Guaranteed Delivery. It must include a guarantee by an Eligible
Institution in the form set out in the Notice of Guaranteed
Delivery. Delivery of the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery and
the Letter of Transmittal and accompanying Common Share
certificates to any office other than such office of the
Depositary does not constitute delivery for purposes of
satisfying a guaranteed delivery.
Method
of Delivery
The method of delivery of certificates representing Common
Shares, the Letter of Transmittal, any Notice of Guaranteed
Delivery and all other required documents is at the option and
risk of the Person depositing those documents. The Offeror
recommends that those documents be delivered by hand to the
Depositary and a receipt be obtained or, if mailed, that
registered mail, with return receipt requested, be used and that
proper insurance be obtained. It is suggested that any such
mailing be made sufficiently in advance of the Expiry Time to
ensure delivery to the Depositary prior to the Expiry Time.
Delivery will only be effective upon actual receipt by the
Depositary.
Shareholders wishing to accept this Offer whose Common Shares
are registered in the name of a nominee should contact their
broker, investment dealer, bank, trust company or other nominee
for assistance in depositing their Common Shares.
Acceptance
by Book-Entry Transfer
Shareholders may accept this Offer by following the procedures
for a book-entry transfer established by CDS, provided that a
Book-Entry Confirmation through CDSX is received by the
Depositary at its office in Toronto, Ontario, Canada prior to
the Expiry Time. The Depositary has established an account at
CDS for the purpose of this Offer. Any financial institution
that is a participant in CDS may cause CDS to make a book-entry
transfer of a Shareholders Common Shares into the
Depositarys account in accordance with CDS procedures for
such transfer. Delivery of Common Shares to the Depositary by
means of a book-entry transfer will constitute a valid tender
under this Offer.
Shareholders, through their respective CDS participants, who so
utilize CDSX to accept this Offer through a book-entry transfer
of their holdings into the Depositarys account with CDS
shall be deemed to have completed and submitted a Letter of
Transmittal and to be bound by the terms thereof and therefore
such instructions received by the Depositary are considered a
valid tender in accordance with the terms of this Offer.
Shareholders may accept this Offer by following the procedures
for book-entry transfer established by DTC, provided that a
Book-Entry Confirmation, together with an Agents Message
in respect thereof, or a properly completed and duly executed
Letter of Transmittal and any other required documents, are
received by the Depositary at its office in Toronto, Ontario,
Canada prior to the Expiry Time. The Depositary has established
an account at DTC for the purpose of this Offer. Any financial
institution that is a participant in DTCs systems may
cause DTC to make a book-entry transfer of a Shareholders
Common Shares into the Depositarys account in accordance
with DTCs procedures for such transfer.
12
However, as noted above, although the delivery of Shares may be
effected through book-entry transfer at DTC, either a Letter of
Transmittal (or a facsimile thereof), properly completed and
duly executed, together with any required signature guarantees,
or an Agents Message in lieu of a Letter of Transmittal,
and any other required documents, must, in any case, be received
by the Depositary, at its office in Toronto, Ontario, Canada,
prior to the Expiry Time. Delivery of documents to DTC in
accordance with its procedures does not constitute delivery to
the Depositary.
Determination
of Validity
All questions as to the validity, form, eligibility (including
timely receipt) and acceptance of any Common Shares deposited
pursuant to this Offer will be determined by the Offeror in its
sole discretion. Depositing Shareholders agree that any such
determination shall be final and binding. The Offeror reserves
the absolute right to reject any and all deposits which it
determines not to be in proper form or which may be unlawful to
accept under the Laws of any jurisdiction. The Offeror reserves
the absolute right to waive any defects or irregularities in the
deposit of any Common Shares. There shall be no duty or
obligation on the Offeror, the Dealer Managers, any Soliciting
Dealer, the Information Agent or the Depositary or any other
Person to give notice of any defect or irregularity in any
deposit and no liability shall be incurred by any of them for
failure to give any such notice. The Offerors
interpretation of the terms of this Offer, the Circular, the
Letter of Transmittal and the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery will
be final and binding. The Offeror reserves the right to permit
this Offer to be accepted in a manner other than that set out
above.
Dividends
and Distributions
Subject to the terms and conditions of this Offer and except as
provided below, by accepting this Offer pursuant to the
procedures set forth above, a Shareholder deposits, sells,
assigns and transfers to the Offeror all right, title and
interest in and to the Common Shares covered by the Letter of
Transmittal delivered to the Depositary (or, in the case of
Common Shares deposited by book-entry transfer, the making of a
book-entry transfer) (the Deposited Securities) and
in and to all rights and benefits arising from such Deposited
Securities, in each case when the Deposited Securities are
purchased by the Offeror, including any and all dividends,
distributions, payments, securities, property or other interests
which may be declared, paid, accrued, issued, distributed, made
or transferred on or in respect of the Deposited Securities or
any of them on and after the date of this Offer, including any
dividends, distributions or payments on such dividends,
distributions, payments, securities, property or other interests
(collectively, Distributions) but excluding any
regular quarterly dividend of Shell Canada of no more than $0.11
per Common Share. Shell Canada has agreed in the Support
Agreement to not declare, set aside or pay any dividends on or
make any other distributions on or in respect of its outstanding
Common Shares (other than quarterly cash dividends of $0.11 per
Common Share in accordance with Shell Canadas past
practice, including as to the timing of the declaration and
payment of any such dividend) or reduce capital in respect of
its outstanding Common Shares.
Power
of Attorney
An executed Letter of Transmittal (or, in the case of Common
Shares deposited by book-entry transfer, the making of a
book-entry transfer) irrevocably appoints, effective on and
after the date that the Offeror takes up the Deposited
Securities covered by the Letter of Transmittal (which
securities, upon being taken up and paid for are, together with
any Distributions thereon, hereinafter referred to as the
Purchased Securities), each director and officer of
the Offeror and any other Person designated by the Offeror in
writing (each an Appointee) as the true and lawful
agents, attorneys and attorneys-in-fact and proxies, with full
power of substitution, of the depositing Shareholder. The Letter
of Transmittal irrevocably authorizes an Appointee, effective on
and after the date the Offeror takes up such Deposited
Securities, in the name and on behalf of such Shareholder:
(a) to register or record the transfer and/or cancellation
of such Purchased Securities (to the extent consisting of
securities) on the appropriate register maintained by or on
behalf of Shell Canada; (b) to exercise any and all rights
of such Shareholder including, without limitation, in connection
with any meeting or meetings (whether annual, special or
otherwise or any adjournment thereof, including, without
limitation, any meeting to consider a Subsequent Acquisition
Transaction) of holders of relevant securities of Shell Canada,
to vote any or all Purchased Securities, to execute, deliver and
revoke any and all instruments of proxy, authorizations or
consents in form and on terms satisfactory to the Offeror in
respect of any or all Purchased Securities and to designate in
any such instrument, authorization or consent any Person or
Persons as the proxyholder of such Shareholder in respect of the
Purchased Securities for all purposes; and (c) to execute,
endorse and negotiate, for and in the name of and on behalf of
such Shareholder, any and all cheques or other instruments
representing any Distribution payable to or to the order of, or
endorsed in favour of, such Shareholder.
13
A Shareholder accepting this Offer under the terms of a Letter
of Transmittal revokes any and all other authority, whether as
agent, attorney-in-fact, attorney, proxy or otherwise,
previously conferred or agreed to be conferred by the
Shareholder at any time with respect to the Deposited Securities
or any Distributions. A Shareholder accepting this Offer agrees
that no subsequent authority, whether as agent,
attorney-in-fact, attorney, proxy or otherwise will be granted
with respect to the Deposited Securities or any Distributions by
or on behalf of the depositing Shareholder, unless the Deposited
Securities are withdrawn or not taken up and paid for under this
Offer. A Shareholder accepting this Offer also agrees not to
vote any of the Purchased Securities at any meeting (whether
annual, special or otherwise or any adjournment thereof,
including, without limitation, any meeting to consider a
Subsequent Acquisition Transaction) of holders of relevant
securities of Shell Canada and not to exercise any of the other
rights or privileges attached to the Purchased Securities, and
agrees to execute and deliver to the Offeror any and all
instruments of proxy, authorizations or consents in respect of
all or any of the Purchased Securities, and to appoint in any
such instruments of proxy, authorizations or consents, the
Person or Persons specified by the Offeror as the proxyholder of
the Purchased Securities. Upon such appointment, all prior
proxies and other authorizations (including, without limitation,
all appointments of any agent, attorney or attorney-in-fact) or
consents given by the holder of such Purchased Securities with
respect thereto will be revoked and no subsequent proxies or
other authorizations or consents may be given by such Person
with respect thereto.
Further
Assurances
A Shareholder accepting this Offer covenants under the terms of
the Letter of Transmittal to execute, upon a request of the
Offeror, any additional documents, transfers and other
assurances as may be necessary or desirable to complete the
sale, assignment and transfer of the Purchased Securities to the
Offeror and acknowledges that all authority therein conferred or
agreed to be conferred may be exercised during any subsequent
legal incapacity of such holder and shall, to the extent
permitted by Law, survive the death or incapacity, bankruptcy or
insolvency of the holder and all obligations of the holder
therein shall be binding upon the heirs, personal
representatives, successors and assigns of such holder.
Depositing
Shareholders Representations and Warranties
The acceptance of this Offer pursuant to the procedures set
forth above constitutes an agreement between a depositing
Shareholder and the Offeror in accordance with the terms and
conditions of this Offer. Such agreement includes a
representation and warranty by the depositing Shareholder that:
(a) the Person signing the Letter of Transmittal has full
power and authority to deposit, sell, assign and transfer the
Deposited Securities and any Distributions being deposited to
this Offer; (b) the Deposited Securities and Distributions
have not been sold, assigned or transferred, nor has any
agreement been entered into to sell, assign or transfer any of
the Deposited Securities and Distributions, to any other Person;
(c) the deposit of the Deposited Securities and
Distributions complies with applicable Laws; and (d) when
the Deposited Securities and Distributions are taken up and paid
for by the Offeror, the Offeror will acquire good title thereto,
free and clear of all liens, restrictions, charges,
encumbrances, claims and rights of others.
|
|
4.
|
Conditions
of the Offer
|
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Offer and subject to
applicable Law, the Offeror shall have the right to withdraw
this Offer and not take up, purchase or pay for, and shall have
the right to extend the period of time during which this Offer
is open for acceptance and postpone taking up and paying for,
any Common Shares deposited under this Offer, unless all of the
following conditions are satisfied or waived by the Offeror at
or prior to the Expiry Time:
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
there shall have been validly deposited or tendered under this
Offer and not withdrawn a number of Common Shares which
constitutes at least a majority of the aggregate number of
outstanding Common Shares (including, for this purpose, Common
Shares underlying any Options or other rights to acquire Common
Shares that are exercisable immediately prior to the Expiry
Time) not currently owned by the Offeror and its affiliates and
the votes attaching to which shall be qualified to be included
as votes in favour of any Subsequent Acquisition Transaction in
determining whether minority approval (as construed under
applicable securities Laws) has been obtained in respect thereof
(the Minimum Condition);
|
|
|
(b)
|
all government or regulatory approvals, authorizations, waiting
or suspensory periods (including any extensions thereof),
waivers, permits, consents, reviews, orders, rulings, decisions,
and exemptions (including those of any stock exchanges or other
securities or regulatory authorities) that are necessary or
desirable to complete this Offer, or complete any acquisition of
the Common Shares not deposited under this Offer on the same
terms as the Common Shares acquired under this Offer pursuant to
a Compulsory Acquisition or any
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent Acquisition Transaction shall have been obtained or
concluded on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Offeror,
acting reasonably;
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
(i) no act, action, suit or proceeding shall have been
threatened, commenced or taken before or by any domestic or
foreign court or tribunal or governmental agency or other
regulatory authority or administrative agency or commission or
by any elected or appointed public official or any other Person
in Canada, the United States or elsewhere, whether or not having
the force of Law; and (ii) no Law shall have been proposed,
enacted, promulgated, amended or applied, in either case:
|
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
to cease trade, enjoin, suspend, prohibit or impose material
interlocutory or permanent limitations or conditions on the
purchase by or the sale to the Offeror of Common Shares, the
right of the Offeror to own or exercise full rights of ownership
of Common Shares, or the consummation of this Offer, a
Compulsory Acquisition or any Subsequent Acquisition Transaction;
|
|
|
(B)
|
which, if this Offer, a Compulsory Acquisition or any Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction were consummated, would reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Shell Canada; or
|
|
|
(C)
|
which challenges, would prevent, or would materially and
adversely affect or make uncertain the ability of the Offeror or
its affiliates to make or consummate this Offer, or to effect a
Compulsory Acquisition or Subsequent Acquisition Transaction;
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
there shall not exist any prohibition at Law against the Offeror
making this Offer or taking up and paying for Common Shares
deposited under this Offer or completing a Compulsory
Acquisition or Subsequent Acquisition Transaction;
|
|
|
(e)
|
there shall have been no breach of the representations,
warranties or covenants of Shell Canada under the Support
Agreement, which breach, individually or in the aggregate, would
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on
Shell Canada or the ability of the Offeror to consummate the
transactions contemplated in the Support Agreement and the
Support Agreement shall not have been terminated; and
|
|
|
(f)
|
there shall not exist and there shall not have occurred since
January 23, 2007 (or if there does exist or shall have
occurred prior to such date there shall not have been disclosed
generally) any change or effect (or condition, event or
development including a prospective change or effect) which when
considered either individually or in the aggregate would have a
Material Adverse Effect on Shell Canada or which, if this Offer,
a Compulsory Acquisition or a Subsequent Acquisition Transaction
were consummated, would have a Material Adverse Effect on the
Offeror or Shell Canada.
|
The foregoing conditions are for the sole benefit of the Offeror
and may be asserted by the Offeror in its sole discretion at any
time, regardless of the circumstances giving rise to any such
assertion, including any action or inaction by the Offeror. The
Offeror may waive any of the foregoing conditions in whole or in
part at any time and from time to time in its sole discretion,
without prejudice to any other rights which the Offeror may
have. The failure by the Offeror at any time to exercise any of
the foregoing rights will not be deemed a waiver of any such
right, the waiver of any such right with respect to particular
facts and other circumstances will not be deemed a waiver with
respect to any other facts and circumstances, and each such
right shall be deemed an ongoing right that may be asserted at
any time and from time to time by the Offeror.
Any waiver of a condition or the withdrawal of this Offer shall
be effective upon written notice, or other communication
confirmed in writing by the Offeror to that effect, to the
Depositary at its principal office in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Forthwith after giving any such notice, the Offeror will make a
public announcement of such waiver or withdrawal, cause the
Depositary, if required by Law, as soon as practicable
thereafter to notify Shareholders in the manner set forth in
Section 11 of this Offer, Notices and Delivery,
and provide a copy of the aforementioned public announcement to
the TSX. If this Offer is withdrawn, the Offeror shall not be
obligated to take up or pay for any Common Shares deposited
under this Offer, and the Depositary will promptly return all
certificates representing deposited Common Shares, Letters of
Transmittal, Notices of Guaranteed Delivery and related
documents to the parties by whom they were deposited at the
Offerors expense. See Section 8 of this Offer,
Return of Deposited Common Shares.
|
|
5.
|
Extension
and Variation of the Offer
|
This Offer will be open for acceptance at the places of deposit
specified in the Letter of Transmittal until the Expiry Time,
unless this Offer is extended or withdrawn by the Offeror.
15
The Offeror expressly reserves the right, in its sole
discretion, at any time and from time to time during the Deposit
Period or at any other time if permitted by Law, to extend the
Deposit Period or, subject to the terms of the Support
Agreement, to vary this Offer by giving written notice, or other
communication confirmed in writing, of such extension or
variation to the Depositary at its principal office in Toronto,
Ontario, Canada, and by causing the Depositary as soon as
practicable thereafter to communicate such notice to all
Shareholders whose Common Shares have not been taken up prior to
the extension or variation in the manner set forth in
Section 11 of this Offer, Notices and Delivery.
The Offeror will as soon as practicable after giving notice of
an extension or variation to the Depositary make a public
announcement of the extension or variation and provide a copy of
the notice to the TSX. Any notice of extension or variation will
be deemed to have been given and be effective at the time on the
day on which it is delivered or otherwise communicated to the
Depositary at its principal office in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Offer may not be extended by
the Offeror if all of the terms and conditions of this Offer,
except those waived by the Offeror, have been fulfilled or
complied with, unless the Offeror first takes up all Common
Shares validly deposited under this Offer and not withdrawn.
Where the terms of this Offer are varied (other than a variation
consisting solely of a waiver of condition of this Offer), the
Deposit Period will not end before 10 calendar days after the
notice of such variation has been given to Shareholders, unless
otherwise permitted by applicable Law and subject to abridgement
or elimination of that period pursuant to such orders as may be
granted by applicable securities regulatory authorities.
If at any time before the Expiry Time, or at any time after the
Expiry Time but before the expiry of all rights of withdrawal
with respect to this Offer, a change occurs in the information
contained in this Offer or the Circular, each as amended from
time to time, that would reasonably be expected to affect the
decision of a Shareholder to accept or reject this Offer (other
than a change that is not within the control of the Offeror or
of an affiliate of the Offeror), the Offeror will give written
notice of such change to the Depositary at its principal office
in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and will cause the Depositary to
provide as soon as practicable thereafter a copy of such notice
in the manner set forth in Section 11 of this Offer,
Notices and Delivery, to all holders of Common
Shares whose Common Shares have not been taken up pursuant to
this Offer at the date of the occurrence of the change, if
required by applicable Law. The Offeror will as soon as
practicable after giving notice of a change in information to
the Depositary make a public announcement of the change in
information and provide a copy of the public announcement to the
TSX. Any notice of change in information will be deemed to have
been given and to be effective on the day on which it is
delivered or otherwise communicated to the Depositary at its
principal office in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
During any such extension or in the event of any such variation
or change in information, all Common Shares deposited and not
taken up or withdrawn will remain subject to this Offer and may
be taken up by the Offeror in accordance with the terms of this
Offer, subject to Section 6 of this Offer, Withdrawal
of Deposited Common Shares. An extension of the Deposit
Period, a variation of this Offer or a change to information
does not constitute a waiver by the Offeror of its rights under
Section 4 of this Offer, Conditions of the
Offer.
If the consideration being offered for the Common Shares under
this Offer is increased, the increased consideration will be
paid to all depositing Shareholders whose Common Shares are
taken up under this Offer without regard to when such Common
Shares are taken up by the Offeror.
|
|
6.
|
Withdrawal
of Deposited Common Shares
|
Except as otherwise stated in this Section 6, all deposits
of Common Shares pursuant to this Offer are irrevocable. Unless
otherwise required or permitted by applicable Law, any Common
Shares deposited in acceptance of this Offer may be withdrawn by
or on behalf of the depositing Shareholder:
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
at any time before the Common Shares have been taken up by the
Offeror pursuant to this Offer;
|
|
|
(b)
|
at any time before the expiration of 10 calendar days from the
date upon which either:
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
a notice of change relating to a change which has occurred in
the information contained in this Offer, which change is one
that would reasonably be expected to affect the decision of a
Shareholder to accept or reject this Offer (other than a change
that is not within the control of the Offeror or of an affiliate
of the Offeror) in the event that such change occurs before the
Expiry Time or after the Expiry Time but before the expiry of
all rights of withdrawal in respect of this Offer; or
|
|
|
(ii)
|
a notice of variation concerning a variation in the terms of
this Offer (other than a variation consisting solely of an
increase in the consideration offered for the Common Shares
pursuant to this Offer where
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
the time for deposit is not extended for a period greater than
10 calendar days or a variation consisting solely of a waiver of
a condition of this Offer),
|
is mailed, delivered or otherwise properly communicated, but
only if such deposited Common Shares have not been taken up by
the Offeror at the time of the notice and subject to abridgement
of that period pursuant to such order or orders as may be
granted by Canadian courts or securities regulatory authorities;
or
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
at any time after three business days from the date the Offeror
takes up the Common Shares, if such Common Shares have not been
paid for by the Offeror.
|
If the Offeror waives any terms or conditions of this Offer and
extends this Offer in circumstances where the rights of
withdrawal set forth in Section 6(b) above are applicable,
this Offer shall be extended without the Offeror first taking up
the Common Shares which are subject to the rights of withdrawal.
Withdrawals of Common Shares deposited under this Offer must be
effected by notice of withdrawal made by or on behalf of the
depositing Shareholder and must be received by the Depositary at
the place of deposit of the applicable Common Shares within the
time limits indicated above. Notice of withdrawal must:
(a) be made by a method, including facsimile transmission,
that provides the Depositary with a written or printed copy;
(b) be signed by the Person who signed the Letter of
Transmittal accompanying, or the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery
in respect of, the Common Shares which are to be withdrawn; and
(c) specify such Persons name, the number of Common
Shares to be withdrawn, the name of the registered holder and
the certificate number shown on each certificate representing
the Common Shares to be withdrawn. The withdrawal will take
effect upon receipt by the Depositary of the properly completed
notice of withdrawal. Any signature on the notice of withdrawal
must be guaranteed by an Eligible Institution in the same manner
as in a Letter of Transmittal (as described in the instructions
set out in such letter), except in the case of Common Shares
deposited for the account of an Eligible Institution. None of
the Offeror, the Dealer Managers, any Soliciting Dealer, the
Information Agent or the Depositary, or any other Person will be
under any duty or obligation to give notice of any defect or
irregularity in any notice of withdrawal or shall incur any
liability for failure to give such notice.
Alternatively, if Common Shares have been deposited pursuant to
the procedures for book-entry transfer, as set forth in
Section 3 of this Offer, Manner of
Acceptance Acceptance by Book-Entry Transfer,
any notice of withdrawal must specify the name and number of the
account at CDS or DTC, as applicable, to be credited with the
withdrawn Common Shares and otherwise comply with the procedures
of CDS or DTC, as applicable.
Withdrawals may not be rescinded and any Common Shares withdrawn
will thereafter be deemed not validly deposited for purposes of
this Offer. However, withdrawn Common Shares may be redeposited
at any time at or prior to the Expiry Time by again following
one of the procedures described in Section 3 of this Offer,
Manner of Acceptance.
If the Offeror is delayed in taking up or paying for Common
Shares or is unable to take up or pay for Common Shares for any
reason, then, without prejudice to the Offerors other
rights, Common Shares may not be withdrawn except to the extent
that depositing Shareholders are entitled to withdrawal rights
as set forth in this Section 6 or pursuant to applicable
Laws.
In addition to the foregoing rights of withdrawal, holders of
Common Shares in certain provinces of Canada are entitled to
statutory rights of rescission or to damages, or both, in
certain circumstances. See Section 28 of the Circular,
Offerees Statutory Rights.
All questions as to the validity (including timely receipt) and
form of notices of withdrawal will be determined by the Offeror
in its sole discretion, and such determination will be final and
binding.
|
|
7.
|
Take Up
of and Payment for Deposited Common Shares
|
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of this Offer
(including but not limited to the conditions specified in
Section 4 of this Offer, Conditions of the
Offer), the Offeror will take up Common Shares validly
deposited under this Offer and not withdrawn pursuant to
Section 6 of this Offer, Withdrawal of Deposited
Common Shares, not later than 10 calendar days after the
Expiry Time and will pay for the Common Shares taken up as soon
as possible, but in any event not later than three business days
after taking up the Common Shares. Any Common Shares deposited
under this Offer after the first date on which Common Shares
have been taken up and paid for by the Offeror will be taken up
and paid for not later than 10 calendar days after such deposit.
Subject to applicable Law, the Offeror expressly reserves the
right in its sole discretion to delay or otherwise refrain from
taking up and paying for any Common Shares or to terminate this
Offer and not take up or pay for any Common Shares if any
condition specified in Section 4 of this Offer,
Conditions of the Offer, is not satisfied or waived
by the
17
Offeror at the Expiry Time, by giving written notice thereof, or
other communication confirmed in writing, to the Depositary at
its principal office in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. The Offeror
also expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion and
notwithstanding any other condition of this Offer, to delay
taking up and paying for Common Shares in order to comply, in
whole or in part, with any applicable Law. The Offeror will not,
however, take up and pay for any Common Shares deposited under
this Offer unless it simultaneously takes up and pays for all
Common Shares then validly deposited under this Offer and not
withdrawn.
The Offeror will be deemed to have taken up Common Shares
validly deposited under this Offer and not withdrawn if, as and
when the Offeror gives written notice or other communication
confirmed in writing to the Depositary, at its principal office
in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, to that effect.
The Offeror will pay for Common Shares validly deposited under
this Offer and not withdrawn by providing the Depositary with
sufficient funds (by bank transfer or other means satisfactory
to the Depositary) for transmittal to depositing Shareholders.
Under no circumstances will interest accrue or be paid by the
Offeror or the Depositary to Persons depositing Common Shares on
the purchase price of Common Shares purchased by the Offeror,
regardless of any delay in making such payment. The Depositary
will act as the agent of Persons who have deposited Common
Shares in acceptance of this Offer for the purposes of receiving
payment from the Offeror and transmitting payment to such
Persons, and receipt of payment by the Depositary shall be
deemed to constitute receipt thereof by Persons depositing
Common Shares.
Settlement will be made by the Depositary issuing or causing to
be issued a cheque (except for payments in excess of
$25 million, which will be made by wire transfer), payable
in Canadian funds in the amount to which the Person depositing
Common Shares is entitled. Unless otherwise directed in the
Letter of Transmittal, the cheque will be issued in the name of
the registered holder of deposited Common Shares. Unless the
Person depositing Common Shares instructs the Depositary to hold
the cheque for pick-up by checking the appropriate box in the
Letter of Transmittal, cheques will be forwarded by first class
mail, postage prepaid, to such Person at the address specified
in the Letter of Transmittal. If no address is specified, a
cheque payable in respect of registered Common Shares will be
forwarded to the address of the holder as shown on the share
register maintained by or on behalf of Shell Canada. Cheques
mailed in accordance with the paragraph will be deemed to have
been delivered at the time of mailing.
Depositing Shareholders will not be obligated to pay any
brokerage fee or commission if they accept this Offer by
depositing their Common Shares directly with the Depositary or
utilize the services of any member of the Soliciting Dealer
Group to accept this Offer. However, a broker or other nominee
through whom a Shareholder owns Common Shares may charge a fee
to deposit Common Shares on behalf of the Shareholder.
Shareholders should consult their brokers or other nominees to
determine whether any charges will apply.
|
|
8.
|
Return of
Deposited Common Shares
|
If any deposited Common Shares are not taken up and paid for
pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Offer for any
reason, certificates for Common Shares that are not purchased
will be returned at the Offerors expense as soon as
practicable after the Expiry Time or withdrawal and early
termination of this Offer, as the case may be, by either:
(a) sending certificates representing Common Shares not
purchased (and other relevant documents) by first class mail in
the name of and to the address specified by the Shareholder in
the Letter of Transmittal or, if such name or address is not so
specified, in such name and to such address as shown on the
share register maintained by or on behalf of Shell Canada; or
(b) in the case of Common Shares deposited by book-entry
transfer of such Shares pursuant to the procedures set forth in
Section 3 of this Offer, Manner of
Acceptance Acceptance by Book-Entry Transfer,
such Common Shares will be credited to the depositing
Shareholders account maintained by CDS or DTC, as
applicable.
|
|
9.
|
Mail
Service Interruption
|
Notwithstanding the provisions of this Offer, the Circular, the
Letter of Transmittal, the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery,
cheques, share certificates and any other relevant documents
will not be mailed if the Offeror determines that delivery
thereof by mail may be delayed. Persons entitled to cheques,
share certificates and any other relevant documents which are
not mailed for the foregoing reason may take delivery thereof at
the office of the Depositary to which the deposited certificates
for Common Shares were delivered until such time as the Offeror
has determined that delivery by mail will no longer be delayed.
The Offeror will provide notice of any determination not to mail
under this Section 9 as soon as reasonably practicable
after the making of such determination and in accordance with
Section 11 of this Offer, Notices and Delivery.
Notwithstanding Section 7 of this Offer, Take Up of
and Payment for Deposited Common Shares, cheques,
certificates or other relevant documents not mailed for the
foregoing reason will be conclusively
18
deemed to have been mailed on the first day upon which they are
available for delivery to the depositing Shareholder at the
appropriate office of the Depositary.
|
|
10.
|
Dividends
and Distributions
|
If, on or after the date of this Offer, Shell Canada should
divide, combine, reclassify, consolidate, convert or otherwise
change any of the Common Shares or its capitalization, or should
disclose that it has taken or intends to take any such action,
then the Offeror may, in its sole discretion and without
prejudice to its rights under Section 4 of this Offer,
Conditions of the Offer, make such adjustments as it
deems appropriate to the purchase price or other terms of this
Offer (including, without limitation, the type of securities
offered to be purchased and the consideration payable therefor)
to reflect such division, combination, reclassification,
consolidation, conversion or other change.
Common Shares acquired pursuant to this Offer shall be
transferred by the Shareholders and acquired by the Offeror free
and clear of all liens, charges, encumbrances, claims and
equities and together with all rights and benefits arising
therefrom, including, without limitation and except as provided
below, the right to any and all dividends, distributions,
payments, securities, rights, assets or other interests which
may be declared, paid, issued, distributed, made or transferred
on or after the date of Offer on or in respect of the Common
Shares.
If, on or after the date of this Offer, Shell Canada should
declare, make or pay any Distribution in respect of Common
Shares accepted for purchase pursuant to this Offer which is
payable or distributable to the Shareholders on a record date
which is prior to the date of transfer of such Common Shares
into the name of the Offeror or its nominees or transferees on
the share register maintained by or on behalf of Shell Canada,
then without prejudice to the Offerors rights under
Section 4 of this Offer, Conditions of the
Offer, the whole of any such Distribution (other than any
quarterly cash dividend of no more than $0.11 per Common Share)
will be received and held by the depositing Shareholder for the
account of and for the benefit of the Offeror and will be
promptly remitted and transferred by the depositing Shareholder
to the Depositary for the account of the Offeror, accompanied by
appropriate documentation of transfer. Pending such remittance,
the Offeror will be entitled to all rights and privileges as
owner of any such Distribution and may withhold the entire
purchase price payable by the Offeror pursuant to this Offer or
deduct from the purchase price payable by the Offeror pursuant
to this Offer the amount or value of the Distribution, as
determined by the Offeror in its sole discretion. The
declaration or payment of any such dividend or distribution may
have tax consequences not discussed in Section 18 of the
Circular, Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax
Considerations and Section 19 of the Circular,
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.
Without limiting any other lawful means of giving notice, any
notice to be given by the Offeror or the Depositary pursuant to
this Offer will be deemed to have been properly given to
registered holders of Common Shares if it is in writing and is
mailed by first class mail, postage prepaid, to registered
Shareholders at their respective addresses as shown on the share
register maintained by or on behalf of Shell Canada in respect
of the Common Shares and will be deemed to have been received on
the first business day following the date of mailing. For this
purpose, business day means any day other than a
Saturday, Sunday or statutory holiday in the jurisdiction to
which the notice is mailed. These provisions apply
notwithstanding any accidental omission to give notice to any
one or more Shareholders and notwithstanding any interruption of
mail services in Canada following mailing.
In the event of any interruption of or delay in mail services
following mailing, the Offeror intends to make reasonable
efforts to disseminate any notice to be given by the Offeror or
Depository pursuant to this Offer by other means, such as
publication. Except as otherwise required or permitted by Law,
if post offices in Canada are not open for the deposit of mail,
any notice which the Offeror or the Depositary may give or cause
to be given under this Offer will be deemed to have been
properly given and to have been received by Shareholders if
(i) it is given to the TSX for dissemination through its
facilities, (ii) it is published once in the National
Edition of The Globe and Mail or The National Post
and La Presse or (iii) it is given to the CNW Group
for dissemination through its facilities.
This Offer, the Circular, the Letter of Transmittal and the
Notice of Guaranteed Delivery will be mailed to registered
holders of Common Shares (and to registered holders of
securities exercisable for or convertible into Common Shares) or
made in such other manner as is permitted by applicable
regulatory authorities and the Offeror will use its reasonable
efforts to furnish such documents to brokers, banks and similar
Persons whose names, or the names of whose nominees, appear on
the security holder lists or, if applicable, who are listed as
participants in a clearing agencys security position
listing, for subsequent transmission to beneficial owners of
Common Shares (and securities exercisable into Common Shares)
when such list or listing is received.
19
Wherever this Offer calls for documents to be delivered to the
Depositary, those documents will not be considered delivered
unless and until they have been physically received at any
office(s) listed for the Depositary in the Letter of Transmittal
or at the address of the Depositary in Toronto, Ontario, Canada
listed in the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery, as applicable.
Wherever this Offer calls for documents to be delivered to a
particular office of the Depositary, those documents will not be
considered delivered unless and until they have been physically
received at the particular office at the address listed in the
Letter of Transmittal or Notice of Guaranteed Delivery, as
applicable.
The Offeror reserves the right to, and may, acquire, or cause an
affiliate to acquire, beneficial ownership of Common Shares by
making purchases through the facilities of the TSX, subject to
applicable Law, at any time prior to the Expiry Time. In no
event will the Offeror make any such purchases of Common Shares
until the third business day following the date of this Offer.
If the Offeror purchases Common Shares through the facilities of
the TSX while this Offer is outstanding, the Common Shares so
purchased shall be counted in any determination as to whether
the Minimum Condition has been fulfilled. The aggregate number
of Common Shares beneficially acquired by the Offeror through
the facilities of the TSX while this Offer is outstanding shall
not exceed 5% of the outstanding Common Shares as of the date of
this Offer and the Offeror will issue and file a press release
containing the information prescribed by Law after the close of
business of the TSX on each day on which such Common Shares have
been purchased. For these purposes, Offeror includes
the Offeror and any Person acting jointly or in concert with the
Offeror.
Subject to applicable Laws, the Offeror reserves the right to
make or enter into an arrangement, commitment or understanding
while this Offer is outstanding to sell any Common Shares after
the Expiry Time.
|
|
13.
|
Other
Terms of the Offer
|
The Offeror reserves the right to transfer to one or more
affiliates of the Offeror the right to purchase all or any
portion of the Common Shares deposited pursuant to this Offer,
but any such transfer will not relieve the Offeror of its
obligations under this Offer and will in no way prejudice the
rights of Persons depositing Common Shares to receive payment
for Common Shares validly deposited and accepted for payment
pursuant to this Offer.
No broker, investment dealer or other Person has been
authorized to give any information or to make any representation
or warranty on behalf of the Offeror or any of its affiliates in
connection with this Offer other than as contained in this
Offer, and, if any such information, representation or warranty
is given or made, it must not be relied upon as having been
authorized. No broker, investment dealer or other Person shall
be deemed to be the agent of the Offeror or any of its
affiliates, the Dealer Managers, the Information Agent or the
Depositary for the purposes of this Offer.
This Offer and all contracts resulting from the acceptance of
this Offer shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the Laws of the Province of Alberta and the federal Laws of
Canada applicable therein. Each party to any agreement resulting
from the acceptance of this Offer unconditionally and
irrevocably attorns to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts
of the Province of Alberta.
This document does not constitute an offer or a solicitation to
any Person in any jurisdiction in which such offer or
solicitation is unlawful. This Offer is not being made to (nor
will deposits of Common Shares be accepted from or on behalf of)
holders of Common Shares residing in any jurisdiction in which
the making of this Offer or the acceptance thereof would not be
in compliance with the Laws of such jurisdiction. The Offeror
may, in its sole discretion, take such action as it may deem
necessary to make this Offer in any such jurisdiction and extend
this Offer to holders of Common Shares in any such jurisdiction.
The provisions of the Circular, the Letter of Transmittal and
the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery accompanying this Offer,
including the instructions contained therein, form part of the
terms and conditions of this Offer.
The Offer and the accompanying Circular together constitute the
take-over bid circular required under Canadian provincial and
territorial securities legislation with respect to this Offer.
Shareholders are urged to refer to the accompanying Circular for
additional information relating to this Offer.
20
The Offeror in its sole discretion shall be entitled to make
a final and binding determination of all questions relating to
this Offer, the Circular, the Letter of Transmittal and the
Notice of Guaranteed Delivery, the validity of any acceptance of
this Offer and the validity of any withdrawal of Common
Shares.
DATED: February 8, 2007
Shell Investments
Limited
|
|
|
|
By:
|
(Signed)
Arnold
MacBurnie
|
Chief Executive Officer
21
CIRCULAR
This Circular is furnished in connection with the Offer dated
February 8, 2007 by the Offeror to purchase all of the
issued and outstanding Common Shares (including any Common
Shares which may become outstanding after the date of the Offer
and prior to the Expiry Time upon the exercise of any Options or
other rights to acquire Common Shares) not already held by the
Offeror or its affiliates, at a price of $45.00 per Common Share
in cash. The terms and provisions of the Offer, the Letter of
Transmittal and the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery are
incorporated into and form part of this Circular. Shareholders
should refer to the Offer for details of its terms and
conditions, including details as to payment and withdrawal
rights. Defined terms used in the Offer are used in this
Circular with the same respective meanings unless the context
otherwise requires.
Except as otherwise indicated, the information concerning
Shell Canada contained in the Offer and this Circular has been
taken from, or is based upon, publicly available documents and
records on file with Canadian securities regulatory authorities.
Although the Offeror has no knowledge that would indicate that
any statements contained herein relating to Shell Canada taken
from, or based upon, such documents and records are untrue or
incomplete, none of the Offeror, RDS or any of their respective
officers or directors assumes any responsibility for the
accuracy or completeness of the information relating to Shell
Canada taken from, or based upon, such documents and records, or
for any failure by Shell Canada to disclose events which may
have occurred or may affect the significance or accuracy of any
such information, but which are unknown to the Offeror. Unless
otherwise indicated, information concerning Shell Canada is
given as at February 5, 2007.
The Offeror was incorporated under the CBCA on November 5,
1996 under the name Shell Investments (1996) Limited and
changed its name to Shell Investments Limited on July 27,
2000 pursuant to articles of amendment. Prior to the date hereof
the Offeror has not carried on any commercial activities other
than acting as a holding company, including owning securities of
Shell Canada and the making of the Offer. The Offeror is a
wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of RDS. The registered office
of the Offeror is 3500, 450-1st Street S.W., Calgary, Alberta
T2P 5H1 (Telephone: (403) 216-3600).
RDS was incorporated under the laws of England and Wales on
February 5, 2002, as a private company limited by shares
under the name Forthdeal Limited. On October 27, 2004, it
re-registered as a public company limited by shares and changed
its name to Royal Dutch Shell plc. RDS is a holding company
which owns, directly or indirectly, investments in numerous
companies constituting the Shell Group. RDS is registered at
Companies House, Cardiff, Wales, with company number 04366849,
and the Chamber of Commerce, The Hague, under number 34179503.
RDS registered office is at Shell Centre, London, SE1 7NA,
United Kingdom, and its headquarters are at Carel van
Bylandtlaan 30, 2596 HR, The Hague, The Netherlands (Telephone:
+31 (0)70 377 9111).
In 2005, RDS became the parent company of Royal Dutch Petroleum
Company (Royal Dutch) and of The Shell
Transport and Trading Company, p.l.c. (Shell
Transport), the two former public parent companies of the
Shell Group. RDS, through the Shell Group, employs approximately
109,000 people.
The Shell Groups activities are conducted in more than 140
countries and territories and consists of the upstream
businesses of exploration and production and gas and power and
the downstream businesses of oil products and chemicals.
Collectively, these businesses refine, supply, trade and ship
crude oil products around the world and market fuels and
lubricants for domestic, industrial and transportation use. The
Shell Group also has interests in other industry segments such
as renewables, including wind, solar and hydrogen energy
products.
Schedule B includes details regarding the current directors
and executive officers of each of the Offeror and RDS.
Shell Canada was incorporated under the laws of Canada in 1925
as the successor to The Shell Company of Canada, Limited
(incorporated in 1911), and was continued under the CBCA on
May 1, 1978. The address of the principal executive offices
of Shell Canada is 400-4th Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta,
T2P 0J4 Canada (Telephone:
(403) 691-3111).
Shell Canada, a large integrated petroleum company in Canada,
operates principally in three industry segments:
(i) exploration and production, (ii) oil sands, and
(iii) oil products. The exploration and production segment
comprises exploration, production and marketing activities for
natural gas, natural gas liquids and sulphur. The oil sands
segment is responsible for an integrated bitumen mining and
upgrading operation and Shell Canadas in situ
business in Alberta. The oil products segment manufactures,
distributes and markets refined petroleum products across Canada.
22
The authorized capital of Shell Canada consists of an unlimited
number of Common Shares, an unlimited number of preferred shares
and an unlimited number of 4% cumulative redeemable preference
shares. Based on information provided by Shell Canada, there are
825,662,514 Common Shares (of which RDS indirectly owns
643,308,858 Common Shares), no preferred shares and no 4%
cumulative redeemable preference shares issued and outstanding
as at December 31, 2006.
The Common Shares are listed and posted for trading on the TSX
under the symbol SHC.
Shell Canada is a reporting issuer or the equivalent in all
provinces and territories of Canada (where such concept exists)
and files its continuous disclosure documents with Canadian
securities regulatory authorities. Such documents are available
at www.sedar.com. Shell Canada is also subject to
informational reporting requirements under the
U.S. Exchange Act, and accordingly files or furnishes
reports and other information with the SEC. Reports and other
information filed by Shell Canada with the SEC are available on
the SEC website: www.sec.gov. Any references to
www.sedar.com and www.sec.gov included
in the Offer and this Circular are inactive textual references
only.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Securities Act
(Ontario) and the securities Laws of various provinces of
Canada, the directors of Shell Canada are required to send a
directors circular to all Shareholders in connection with
the Offer and disclose, together with other information, any
material change in the affairs of Shell Canada subsequent to the
date of the most recently published financial statements of
Shell Canada. See the accompanying Directors Circular.
Schedule C includes details regarding the directors and
executive officers of Shell Canada.
|
|
3.
|
Securities
Proceedings
|
Except as disclosed herein, none of RDS, the Offeror, Shell
Canada, or to the knowledge of RDS, the persons listed in
Schedule B, has been convicted in a criminal proceeding
during the past five years (excluding traffic violations or
similar misdemeanors), or has been party to any judicial or
administrative proceeding during the past five years that
resulted in a judgment, decree or final order enjoining such
person for future violations of, or prohibiting activities
subject to, U.S. federal or state securities Laws, or a
finding of any violation of U.S. federal or state securities
Laws.
On August 24, 2004, Royal Dutch and Shell Transport
consented, without admitting or denying the SEC findings that
Royal Dutch and Shell Transport violated Sections 10(b),
13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the U.S. Exchange Act and
Rules 10b-5,
12b-20, 13a-1 and 13b2-1 thereunder, to an administrative order
requiring Royal Dutch and Shell Transport to cease and desist
from future violations of the antifraud, reporting,
recordkeeping and internal control provisions of U.S. federal
securities Laws and related SEC rules. Additionally, in a
separate civil action, Royal Dutch and Shell Transport agreed to
pay a U.S.$120 million civil penalty and undertook to spend
an additional U.S.$5 million developing a comprehensive
internal compliance program. (On July 20, 2005, Royal Dutch
and Shell Transport became subsidiaries of RDS and, on
December 21, 2005, Royal Dutch merged with and into its
subsidiary, Shell Petroleum N.V.).
|
|
4.
|
Background
to the Offer
|
Chronology
of Events
In the evening (Toronto time) of Friday, October 20, 2006,
Mr. Jeroen van der Veer, Chief Executive of RDS, telephoned
Mr. Derek Burney, O.C., Lead Director of Shell Canada, to
discuss a proposal by RDS to make an offer to Shareholders to
acquire the Common Shares not owned by RDS or its affiliates at
a price of $40.00 per Common Share, payable in cash (the
Proposal).
During this conversation, Mr. van der Veer explained that there
were two key reasons for the transaction contemplated by the
Proposal: (i) to simplify further the Shell Group corporate
structure following the successful unification of the Shell
Group in 2005, and (ii) to facilitate the significant
investment and expansion required to optimize growth in Canada
and to drive the maximum efficiency and effectiveness through
full integration yielding full technical co-operation. Mr. van
der Veer stated that the aim was to achieve a transaction
supported by the Board of Directors and that the retention of
the skills and expertise of the management and employees of
Shell Canada was of considerable importance to RDS. Mr. van der
Veer expressed to Mr. Burney RDS desire that the
Board of Directors meet to discuss the Proposal, form a special
committee and retain advisors, as RDS anticipated making a
formal announcement regarding the Proposal prior to the opening
of stock markets in Europe on Monday, October 23, 2006. Mr.
van der Veer stated that he would be contacting Mr. Clive
Mather, Chief Executive Officer of Shell Canada, about the
Proposal, but owing to the fact that Mr. Mather is a senior
executive of Shell Canada and as such, in RDSs view, in a
potential conflict of interest in respect of the Proposal, such
a call would be short and merely a courtesy. Mr. van der Veer
ended the conversation by
23
stating that the Proposal was of considerable importance to him
and that he was taking overall responsibility for it. To this
end, he had assigned Mr. Adrian Loader,
Director Strategy and Business Development of RDS,
to lead the RDS team. Mr. van der Veer noted that
Mr. Loader would soon be contacting Mr. Burney to
discuss the process going forward.
Mr. van der Veer confirmed his conversation with Mr. Burney
by sending to him by facsimile a letter dated October 20,
2006 in which Mr. van der Veer set forth the terms of the
Proposal. In addition to providing that RDS would be prepared to
make an offer to Shareholders to acquire their Common Shares at
a price of $40.00 per Common Share, payable in cash, the
Proposal provided that RDS expected such an offer to be made by
way of take-over bid circular and that Shell Canada would enter
into a support agreement with RDS or an affiliate. The Proposal
further provided that the offer would be conditional on more
than 50% of the Common Shares held by Shareholders being
tendered, as well as other customary conditions. The Proposal
also provided that there would be a condition that RDS shall
have determined (or shall have been satisfied by Shell Canada)
that no covenant or condition exists in any agreement or
instrument of Shell Canada that would make it inadvisable for
RDS to proceed. The letter reiterated Mr. van der Veers
request that the Board of Directors establish a special
committee of independent directors of Shell Canada to supervise
the preparation of a formal independent valuation and make a
recommendation with respect to the Proposal and undertook to pay
the costs of the valuation. Finally, the letter indicated that
it was RDS desire to proceed with a transaction supported
by the Board of Directors and RDS expressly reserved the right
not to proceed with making an offer to Shareholders if it was
unable to obtain the support of the Board of Directors.
Following his conversation with Mr. Burney, Mr. van der
Veer telephoned Mr. Mather and informed him of RDS
desire to make an offer for the Common Shares. Mr. van der Veer
emphasised that he had called Mr. Mather at the earliest
possible opportunity and hoped for a successful transaction.
However, in view of Mr. Mather having a potential conflict
of interest in relation to the Proposal, Mr. van der Veer
suggested that Mr. Mather should discuss matters further
with Mr. Burney.
Later on Friday, October 20, 2006, following Mr. van der
Veers conversation with Mr. Burney, Mr. Loader
contacted Mr. Burney. During this conversation,
Mr. Loader and Mr. Burney discussed proposed contacts
at the Canadian federal government and the Alberta provincial
government in Canada, as well as Mr. Burneys plan to
call a meeting of all of the directors of Shell Canada on
Saturday, October 21, 2006. Mr. Burney also confirmed
receipt of the letter from Mr. van der Veer outlining the terms
of the Proposal.
In the late afternoon (Toronto time) on Saturday,
October 21, 2006, Mr. Burney contacted Mr. Loader
following a meeting of the directors of Shell Canada (with
Messrs. Odum and Routs not in attendance). Mr. Burney
reported that the Board of Directors had established a special
committee (the Special Committee) which he would
chair and which would also include Messrs. Kerry Hawkins,
Ron Osborne and David Kerr and Ms. Nancy Southern (who
subsequently resigned from the Special Committee for personal
reasons). Mr. Burney mentioned that Mr. Mather had
taken external legal advice which had confirmed he was in a
conflict of interest position which prevented him from actively
participating in the negotiation of a transaction.
On Sunday, October 22, 2006, Mr. Burney confirmed to
Mr. Loader the establishment of the Special Committee as
well as the appointment by the Special Committee of CIBC World
Markets as independent valuator and financial advisor to the
Special Committee and the appointment of Ogilvy Renault LLP as
the Special Committees legal counsel. Mr. Burney went
on to convey the contents of the press release that Shell Canada
intended to release in response to the proposed offer.
On Monday, October 23, 2006, prior to the opening of stock
markets in Europe, RDS issued a press release indicating that
RDS had approached the Board of Directors to indicate its
Proposal to acquire the minority interest in Shell Canada at a
price of $40.00 per Common Share, payable in cash.
Prior to the opening of stock markets in Canada on
October 23, 2006, Shell Canada issued a press release
confirming that it had received the Proposal from RDS and that
the Board of Directors had established a Special Committee to
consider the Proposal and had engaged financial and legal
advisors.
On Monday, October 30, 2006, Mr. Burney updated
Mr. Loader on the timing of the Special Committees
deliberations. Mr. Loader indicated that RDS had prepared a
due diligence list incorporating questions concerning legal,
human resources and valuation issues for the purpose of
conducting due diligence in respect of the Proposal.
Mr. Burney requested that the list be sent to him.
24
On Friday, November 24, 2006, Mr. Burney provided
Mr. Loader with an update regarding the timing of the
preliminary valuation analysis in respect of Shell Canada being
completed by CIBC World Markets. Mr. Burney indicated that
he hoped to receive a preliminary analysis from CIBC World
Markets in early December 2006.
On December 4, 2006, further to RDS request for
access to certain information of Shell Canada for the purpose of
conducting due diligence in respect of the Proposal, a
confidentiality agreement was negotiated and executed by RDS and
Shell Canada, following which RDS was provided with access to
such information.
On Wednesday, December 6, 2006, Mr. Burney conveyed to
Mr. Loader that, based on the valuation work undertaken to
date by CIBC World Markets, the Special Committee was of the
view that it could not support an offer price of $40.00 per
Common Share in cash. Under the circumstances, Mr. Burney
indicated that he felt that the best next step was to establish
a process for a constructive dialogue between RDS
financial advisors, Morgan Stanley & Co. Limited and
Scotia Waterous Inc., and CIBC World Markets.
On Friday, December 8, 2006, Mr. Loader contacted
Mr. Burney to discuss RDS review of the information
supplied by Shell Canada. Mr. Loader stated that RDS had
not uncovered any information which would support an increase in
the intended offer price of $40.00 per Common Share.
Mr. Loader and Mr. Burney agreed that there should be
a meeting of financial advisors to discuss valuation analyses
and that this meeting should take place in Calgary on
December 14, 2006.
On Thursday, December 14, 2006, representatives of CIBC
World Markets met with the financial advisors to RDS to discuss
various issues relating to valuation methodologies and
assumptions. Subsequent to this meeting, the financial advisors
to RDS delivered a letter to CIBC World Markets reaffirming
their view that the Proposal represented full and fair value for
the Common Shares and setting out differences in opinion with
respect to the appropriateness of assumptions being used by
Shell Canada in its projections and plans and the macro-economic
and discount rate assumptions proposed by CIBC World Markets in
preparing the formal valuation. CIBC World Markets provided a
response to this letter to RDS financial advisors
clarifying certain of its assumptions and inputs.
On Friday, December 15, 2006, Mr. Burney in a
conversation with Mr. Loader indicated that despite the
meeting among the financial advisors the day before, there were
still divergent views on the valuation of Shell Canada. It was
decided that the next step should be a meeting among Shell
Canada, CIBC World Markets, RDS and RDS financial
advisors. On Friday, December 22, 2006, the financial
advisors to RDS sent a letter to CIBC World Markets indicating
their willingness to participate in the meeting, and reiterating
their differences of opinion regarding the valuation of Shell
Canada. On Tuesday, January 9, 2007, the proposed meeting
between Shell Canada, CIBC World Markets, RDS and RDS
financial advisors took place in Calgary. At that meeting, Shell
Canada representatives presented information covering several
key areas of Shell Canadas business plans. CIBC World
Markets and the financial advisors to RDS then met separately on
that same day to discuss valuation assumptions and
methodologies. On January 10, 2007, Mr. Burney met
with Mr. Loader about the January 9 meetings. On
January 11, 2007, RDS sent an email to Shell Canada
detailing a number of follow-up questions stemming from the
meeting to which Shell Canada replied by email on
January 15, 2007.
On January 18, 2007, Mr. Loader and Mr. Burney
had a conversation to explore valuation issues. Mr. Loader
and Mr. Burney discussed several factors and their possible
influence on a valuation, such as the market, oil price
fluctuations and views on asset values. During this
conversation, Mr. Loader mentioned that RDS might be
prepared to discuss a possible increase in the consideration
under the Proposal up to $43.50 per Common Share.
Mr. Burney said that he would go back to the Special
Committee to advise them of this development.
On January 19, 2007, Mr. Loader and Mr. Burney
continued their conversations regarding valuation.
Mr. Burney reported that the Special Committee met to
consider a possible increase in the consideration under the
Proposal up to $43.50 per Common Share, which was not favourably
received. Mr. Loader mentioned that he believed RDS might
be willing to consider an offer price of $44.50 per Common
Share, provided the offer was supported by the Special Committee
and the Board of Directors. Mr. Burney said he believed
that a price below $45.00 per Common Share might be at the low
end of the range of values being developed by CIBC World
Markets, but in any event would not receive the support of the
Special Committee. Mr. Burney said that he would go back to
the Special Committee for the purpose of considering a price of
$44.50. Later that day, Mr. Burney reiterated his views
regarding pricing.
On January 21, 2007, Mr. Burney and Mr. Loader
continued their discussion regarding valuation, and
Mr. Loader suggested to Mr. Burney that he believed an
offer price could be arrived at that would be acceptable to the
board of directors of RDS and suggested that a price of $44.75
might satisfy these requirements.
On Monday, January, 22, 2007, Mr. Loader received word from
Mr. Burney that if RDS were to make an offer of $45.00 per
Common Share, payable in cash, that such an offer would likely
receive the support of the Special Committee.
25
Mr. Loader and Mr. Burney agreed that they would work
towards this end through the negotiation of a support agreement,
which, together with an increased price, could be presented to
the Special Committee and Board of Directors for their
consideration.
Later in the evening of Monday, January 22, 2007,
Mr. Burney contacted Mr. Loader to confirm that the
Board of Directors had met that evening and received the
recommendation of the Special Committee to support the Offer.
After considering the foregoing and receiving advice from
financial and legal advisors, the Board of Directors (excluding
Mr. Mather, President and Chief Executive Officer of Shell
Canada, and the members of the Board of Directors who are
nominees or officers of RDS or its affiliates, who each
abstained from voting): (a) approved a form of draft
Support Agreement, and (b) resolved to recommend that
Shareholders accept the Offer, subject to the successful
negotiation of the Support Agreement. See Agreements
Relating to the Offer in Section 5 of this Circular.
Over the course of the night of January 22, 2007 and early
morning of January 23, 2007, the respective legal advisors
of the Offeror, RDS and the Special Committee and in-house legal
counsel at Shell Canada negotiated the final terms of the
Support Agreement.
Early in the morning of January 23, 2007, prior to the
opening of trading on stock markets in Europe and Canada, Shell
Canada and the Offeror finalized and executed the Support
Agreement and immediately thereafter RDS and Shell Canada issued
separate press releases announcing the entering into of the
Support Agreement, RDSs intention to make the Offer and
the support of the Offer by the Special Committee and Board of
Directors.
|
|
5.
|
Agreements
Relating to the Offer
|
Support
Agreement
On January 23, 2007, the Offeror and Shell Canada entered
into the Support Agreement. The Support Agreement sets forth the
terms and conditions under which the Offeror agreed to make the
Offer and the agreement by Shell Canada to take certain actions
in support of the Offer. The Support Agreement also establishes
the conditions of the Offer, which are set forth in
Section 4 of the Offer, Conditions of the
Offer. A copy of the Support Agreement is available at
www.sedar.com.
The Offeror and Shell Canada have agreed in the Support
Agreement that the terms or conditions of the Offer may be
modified or waived by the Offeror, in its sole discretion,
provided that the Offeror shall not, without Shell Canadas
prior consent: (a) increase the Minimum Condition;
(b) decrease the consideration per Common Share;
(c) change the form of consideration payable under the
Offer (other than to increase the total consideration per Common
Share and/or add additional consideration); (d) decrease
the number of Common Shares in respect of which the Offer is
made; or (e) impose additional conditions or otherwise vary
the Offer in a manner which is adverse to the Shareholders.
Pursuant to the Support Agreement, Shell Canada has agreed that
it will, and will cause each of its subsidiaries and, to the
extent possible, its material joint ventures to, conduct its and
their respective businesses in the ordinary course consistent
with past practice in all material respects, other than as
disclosed in documents made available to the Offeror prior to
the execution of the Support Agreement. In addition, Shell
Canada has agreed not to: (a) issue, sell, pledge, dispose
of, encumber, agree or offer to issue, sell, pledge, dispose of
or encumber (or permit any of its subsidiaries to issue, sell,
pledge, dispose of, encumber, agree or offer to issue, sell,
pledge, dispose of or encumber) any additional shares or
securities of, or any options (including any additional stock
options under the LTIP), warrants, calls, conversion privileges
or rights of any kind to acquire any shares of Shell Canada or
any of its subsidiaries (other than pursuant to the exercise of
options issued prior to the date of the Support Agreement under
the LTIP); (b) amend its articles or by-laws or the terms
of any of its outstanding securities, any outstanding
indebtedness or credit facilities, other than as disclosed in
documents made available to the Offeror prior to the execution
of the Support Agreement; (c) split, consolidate or
reclassify any of its outstanding Common Shares or undertake any
other capital reorganization, or declare, set aside or pay any
dividends on or make any other distributions on or in respect of
its outstanding shares (other than quarterly cash dividends of
$0.11 per Common Share in accordance with Shell Canadas
past practice, including as to the timing of the declaration and
payment of any such dividend), or reduce capital in respect of
its outstanding Common Shares; (d) redeem, purchase or
offer to purchase any Common Shares or other securities of Shell
Canada; (e) grant to any officer or senior employee of
Shell Canada or its subsidiaries any increase in compensation or
enter into any employment agreement with any current officer or
senior employee of Shell Canada or its subsidiaries other than
such grants as are consistent with past practice; (f) enter
into any transaction or perform any act which might
(i) interfere with or delay the take up and payment for
Common Shares deposited under the Offer or the completion of the
Offer or successful completion of a Compulsory Acquisition or
Subsequent Acquisition Transaction, (ii) render inaccurate
any of the representations and warranties set forth in the
26
Support Agreement as if such representations and warranties were
made at a date subsequent to such transaction or act and all
references to the date of the Support Agreement were to such
later date or (iii) adversely affect Shell Canadas
ability to perform its covenants and agreements under the
Support Agreement; (g) incur any additional indebtedness
(other than in the normal and ordinary course), other than as
disclosed in documents made available to the Offeror prior to
the execution of the Support Agreement; and (h) except as
contemplated in any existing contractual commitments, acquire,
sell or otherwise dispose of, or commit to acquire or sell, any
assets or property or group of related assets or property
(through one or more related or unrelated acquisitions), having
a value and/or cost in excess of $100,000,000 in the aggregate.
Shell Canada has agreed to promptly notify the Offeror of any
offer or indication of and intention to make an offer by any
third party in respect of any of the material properties or
assets of Shell Canada, its subsidiaries or material joint
ventures and provide copies of any written notification or offer
received by it.
The Support Agreement states that if, within 120 days after
the date of the Offer, the Offer has been accepted by holders of
not less than 90% of the outstanding Common Shares as at the
Expiry Time (other than Common Shares held by the Offeror or its
affiliates), the Offeror may, to the extent possible, acquire
the remainder of the Common Shares from those Shareholders who
have not accepted the Offer pursuant to a Compulsory Acquisition
under Section 206 of the CBCA. If that statutory right of
acquisition is not available or the Offeror chooses not to avail
itself of such statutory right of acquisition, the Offeror will
use its commercially reasonable efforts to pursue other means of
acquiring the remaining Common Shares not tendered to the Offer
at consideration per Common Share at least equivalent in value
to, and in the same form as, the consideration per Common Share
offered under the Offer. Subject to applicable Laws and to the
fiduciary obligations of the Board of Directors, if the Minimum
Condition is satisfied and the Offeror takes up any Common
Shares under the Offer, Shell Canada has agreed in the Support
Agreement that it will assist the Offeror in connection with any
Subsequent Acquisition Transaction to acquire the remaining
Common Shares and any outstanding Options, provided that the
consideration per Common Share offered in connection with the
Subsequent Acquisition Transaction is at least equivalent in
value to, and is in the same form as, the consideration per
Common Share offered under the Offer.
The Support Agreement may be terminated by the Offeror if:
(i) the Minimum Condition or any other condition of the
Offer is not satisfied or waived on or prior to the expiry of
the Offer; (ii) Shell Canada breaches the Support Agreement
in any material respect; or (iii) the Directors
Circular does not substantially conform or is modified in a
manner not to conform with the description thereof in the
Support Agreement.
The Support Agreement may be terminated by Shell Canada if:
(i) the Offer does not substantially conform, or is
modified in a manner not to conform, with the description
thereof in the Support Agreement; (ii) the Offeror does not
take up and pay for all Common Shares deposited under the Offer
within 10 days after the expiry of the Offer;
(iii) the Offeror has not taken up and paid for at least a
majority of the Common Shares then outstanding not currently
owned by the Offeror or its affiliates by June 30, 2007, or
(iv) the Offeror breaches the Support Agreement in any
material respect.
Treatment
of Options
The Offer is made only for Common Shares and is not made for any
outstanding, unexercised Options or other rights to acquire
Common Shares. Holders of Options should refer to the materials
that will be delivered to them separately. As set out in the
Option Exchange Letter from SC OptionCo, Shell Canada and
RDS, holders of Options will be entitled, subject to the
obtaining of all necessary regulatory and other approvals and
the Offeror taking up and paying for Common Shares deposited
under the Offer in a number that satisfies the Minimum
Condition, to surrender their Options in exchange for
Replacement Options to acquire Class A Ordinary shares of
RDS. Holders of Options who are considering exercising Options
in order to participate in the Offer are strongly urged to
consult their own tax advisors before doing so.
|
|
6.
|
Reasons
to Accept the Offer
|
The Offeror believes that the Offer price of $45.00 per Common
Share in cash is a full and fair price for the Common Shares
which it is seeking to purchase under the Offer. Shareholders
should consider the following factors, among others, in making a
decision whether to accept the Offer:
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
the opinion of CIBC World Markets provided to the Special
Committee that, as of January 22, 2007, (i) the fair
market value of the Common Shares was in the range of
$42 to $48 per Common Share, and (ii) the
consideration under the Offer was fair, from a financial point
of view, to Shareholders. See Section 12 of this Circular,
CIBC World Markets Valuation and CIBC World Markets
Fairness Opinion;
|
27
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
that the consideration offered under the Offer of $45.00 is at
the midpoint of the fair market value range for the Common
Shares of $42 to $48 per Common Share as determined by CIBC
World Markets. See Section 12 of this Circular, CIBC
World Markets Valuation and CIBC World Markets Fairness
Opinion;
|
|
|
(c)
|
that the consideration offered under the Offer of $45.00 per
Common Share in cash represents a premium of: 37.2% to the
October 20, 2006 closing price of the Common Shares on the
TSX; and 44.7% to the average closing price of the Common Shares
on the TSX for the 30 calendar days preceding and including
October 20, 2006;
|
|
|
(d)
|
that the consideration offered under the Offer is cash;
|
|
|
(e)
|
information concerning the business, operations, assets,
financial condition, reserves, production, expansion plans,
operating results and prospects for Shell Canada;
|
|
|
(f)
|
that if the Offer is not successful, trading prices for the
Common Shares on the TSX may decline significantly;
|
|
|
(g)
|
the active arms length negotiations between the Special
Committee and RDS, which resulted in the Proposal of $40.00 per
Common Share being increased to the Offer of $45.00 per Common
Share;
|
|
|
(h)
|
the fact that, given RDS shareholdings, there is no
practical prospect of a competing offer for the Common Shares by
a third party; and
|
|
|
(i)
|
in the case of the Board of Directors, the Special Committee
process, including the retention of Ogilvy Renault LLP as
independent legal advisors and CIBC World Markets as independent
valuator, and the recommendation of the Board of Directors and
the Special Committee that Shareholders accept the Offer and
tender their Common Shares to the Offer. For further
information, see the Directors Circular.
|
The foregoing list of factors is not intended to be exhaustive.
Shareholders should consider the Offer carefully and come to
their own conclusions as to whether to accept or reject the
Offer. Shareholders who are in doubt as to how to respond should
consult with their own investment dealer, stockbroker, bank
manager, lawyer or other professional advisor. Shareholders are
advised that acceptance of the Offer may have tax consequences
and they should consult their own professional tax advisors.
SPECIAL
FACTORS
The following Sections 7 through Section 12
(inclusive), of this Circular contain information which may,
under applicable U.S. federal securities Laws, contain
information considered special factors.
|
|
7.
|
Purpose
of, Alternatives to, Reasons for and Effects of the Offer and
Plans for Shell Canada
|
Purpose
of the Offer
The purpose of the Offer is to enable the Offeror to acquire all
of the Common Shares not already held by the Offeror and its
affiliates. If the conditions of the Offer are satisfied or
waived and the Offeror takes up and pays for the Common Shares
validly deposited under the Offer, the Offeror currently intends
to acquire any Common Shares not deposited under the Offer by
Compulsory Acquisition, if available, or propose a Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction, in each case for consideration per
Common Share at least equal in value to the consideration paid
by the Offeror per Common Share under the Offer. The exact
timing and details of any such transaction will depend upon a
number of factors, including the number of Common Shares
acquired by the Offeror pursuant to the Offer. The Offeror
currently intends to retain all Common Shares acquired pursuant
to the Offer, however it reserves the right to transfer or sell
the Common Shares at any time in the future should its intention
change.
If the Minimum Condition is satisfied, the Offeror should own
sufficient Common Shares to effect a Compulsory Acquisition or a
Subsequent Acquisition Transaction. Although the Offeror
currently intends to proceed by way of a Compulsory Acquisition
or a Subsequent Acquisition Transaction generally on the terms
described herein, it is possible that, as a result of delays in
the Offerors ability to effect such a transaction,
information subsequently obtained by the Offeror, changes in
general economic or market conditions or in the business of
Shell Canada, or other currently unforeseen circumstances, such
a transaction may not be proposed, may be delayed or abandoned
or may be proposed on different terms. Accordingly, the Offeror
reserves the right, subject to the terms of the Support
Agreement, not to proceed by way of a Compulsory Acquisition or
Subsequent Acquisition Transaction, or to proceed by way of a
Subsequent Acquisition Transaction on terms other than as
described herein. See Section 21 of this Circular,
Acquisition of Common Shares Not Deposited.
28
Alternatives
Considered
The alternatives, in addition to a take-over bid, considered by
RDS to acquire the Common Shares included:
A statutory plan of arrangement under the
CBCA. RDS considered a plan of arrangement
whereby Shareholders, as well as a court, would be required to
approve the plan of arrangement and pursuant to which
Shareholders would receive cash. This alternative was rejected
out of concerns that it would take longer than the Offer and
that it was a procedurally more cumbersome and less flexible
method.
An amalgamation transaction between Shell Canada and an
affiliate of RDS. RDS considered a structure
whereby Shareholders would receive redeemable preference shares
immediately redeemable for cash. The structure would also
require shareholder approval. Similarly, this alternative was
rejected out of concerns that it would take longer than the
Offer and that it was a procedurally more cumbersome and less
flexible method.
Reasons
for the Offer
If the Offer is successful, upon the acquisition of all of the
outstanding Common Shares, RDS intends to integrate further the
business and operations of Shell Canada, thereby further
simplifying the Shell Group structure. Once Shell Canada is
fully integrated into the Shell Group, the overall business is
expected to benefit from a simplified organization, additional
economies of scale and portfolio development in the context of
the Shell Groups global strategy.
Plans
for Shell Canada and Effects of the Offer
Upon completion of the Offer, and assuming the Offer results in
the Offeror acquiring all of the Common Shares, the
Offerors interest in the earnings and net book value of
Shell Canada as of December 31, 2006, would increase by
$384 million and $2,116 million, respectively.
Accordingly, the Offeror and its shareholders will be the
beneficiaries of any future increases in the value of Shell
Canada and will bear the entire risk of all losses incurred in
the operation of, and all decreases in the value of, Shell
Canada. Shareholders will no longer have an equity interest in
Shell Canada and will therefore cease to benefit from, and bear
any of the risks incident to, ownership of an equity interest in
Shell Canada.
For a discussion of certain tax considerations, please see
Section 18 of this Circular, Certain Canadian Federal
Income Tax Considerations and Section 19 of this
Circular, Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax
Considerations.
If permitted by applicable Law, subsequent to the completion of
the Offer and any Compulsory Acquisition or Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction, the Offeror intends: (i) to
de-list the Common Shares from the TSX; (ii) to cause Shell
Canada to cease to be a reporting issuer for
purposes of relevant Canadian securities Laws; and (iii) to
terminate the registration of Shell Canada under the U.S.
Exchange Act such that Shell Canada will no longer be subject to
the periodic reporting obligations of the U.S. Exchange Act or
otherwise be subject to the U.S. federal securities Laws
applicable to public companies. The effect of these actions will
be that Shell Canada will no longer be required to file
publicly, or provide to security holders or others, financial
information or timely disclosure with respect to its business
and affairs and that the liquidity and market value of any
remaining Common Shares held by the public may be adversely
affected. See Section 16 of this Circular, Effect of
the Offer on the Market for Common Shares; Stock Exchange
Listing; and Public Disclosure by Shell Canada. For a
further discussion of the effects of the Offer, please see
Section 4 of this Circular, Background to
the Offer.
The Support Agreement also provides that following the time at
which the Offeror takes up and pays for any Common Shares under
the Offer in such event that the Minimum Condition has been
satisfied (and not waived) (the Effective Date), and
from time to time thereafter, the Offeror will be entitled to
designate all of the directors to the Board of Directors and any
committees thereof and Shell Canada shall not frustrate the
Offerors attempts to do so and shall co-operate with the
Offeror to secure the resignations of incumbent directors on the
date specified by the Offeror and facilitate the Offerors
designees to be elected or appointed to the Board of Directors
without the necessity of calling a meeting of shareholders. The
Offeror currently intends at that time to procure the
resignation of non-executive directors of Shell Canada and is
evaluating further changes. Consistent with Shell Canada being a
wholly owned subsidiary after completion of the Offer, RDS may
revise Shell Canadas capitalization and indebtedness.
Other than as disclosed in this Circular, neither RDS nor the
Offeror has, at the date of this Offer and Circular, approved
any specific plans or proposals for:
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
any extraordinary corporate transaction, such as a merger,
reorganization or liquidation, involving Shell Canada or any of
its subsidiaries after the completion of the Offer;
|
29
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
any purchase, sale or transfer of a material amount of assets
currently held by Shell Canada or any of its subsidiaries after
the completion of the Offer;
|
|
|
(c)
|
any change in the Board of Directors or management of Shell
Canada; or
|
|
|
(d)
|
any material change in the present dividend policy,
indebtedness, capitalization, corporate structure or business of
Shell Canada after the completion of the Offer.
|
The Offeror estimates that if it acquires all of the Common
Shares on a fully-diluted basis pursuant to the Offer, the total
cash amount required to purchase such shares and pay related
fees and expenses will be approximately $8.7 billion
(U.S.$7.4 billion based on the noon rate of exchange as
reported by the Bank of Canada on February 5, 2007). RDS
has agreed to fund or arrange for the funding of the Offer in an
amount sufficient to satisfy such cash requirement by way of
equity investment in the Offeror and/or intra-group loans to the
Offeror. RDS intends to finance such funding requirements using
existing cash resources and through the Shell Groups
(other than Shell Canadas) commercial paper programmes
(Commercial Paper Programmes). The Shell Group
currently has in place two Commercial Paper Programmes with
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Goldman Sachs & Co.,
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., and Morgan Stanley &
Co. Incorporated, as dealers, for up to U.S.$10 billion
each. Issuances are at prevailing market prices and are
guaranteed by RDS.
The Offeror believes that the financial condition of each of RDS
and the Offeror is not material to a decision by a Shareholder
whether to deposit Common Shares under the Offer because:
(a) cash is the only consideration that will be paid to
Shareholders in connection with the Offer; (b) the Offeror
is offering to purchase all of the outstanding Common Shares in
the Offer; (c) with the availability of funds under the
Commercial Paper Programmes, RDS will have sufficient funds to
fund or arrange for funding of the Offeror with the total amount
required to purchase the Common Shares under the Offer. The
Offeror and RDS reasonably believe the possibility to be remote
that, if the conditions of the Offer are satisfied or waived by
the Offeror, the Offeror will be unable to pay for the Common
Shares deposited under the Offer due to the unavailability of
funds under the Commercial Paper Programmes. Consequently, there
are no alternative financing plans or arrangements.
|
|
9.
|
Beneficial
Ownership of and Trading in Securities
|
An aggregate of 643,308,858 Common Shares representing
approximately 78% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares
are beneficially owned by the Offeror or its affiliates.
Additionally, Rob Routs, an Executive Director of RDS and a
member of the board of directors of Shell Canada, beneficially
owns 1,509 Common Shares and Arnold MacBurnie, the Chief
Executive Officer of the Offeror, beneficially owns
600 Common Shares, each respectively, representing less
than 0.01% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares. Except
as described in this Offer and Circular, none of (i) the
directors or senior or executive officers of the Offeror or RDS,
or, (ii) to the knowledge of the directors and senior
officers of the Offeror and RDS, after reasonable enquiry:
(a) their respective associates; (b) any Person acting
jointly or in concert with the Offeror or RDS; (c) any
Person holding more than 10% of any class of equity securities
of the Offeror or RDS; or (d) any majority owned subsidiary
of the Offeror or RDS (other than the Offeror and Shell
Petroleum N.V.), beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, or
controls or exercises direction over, or has the right to
acquire, any securities of Shell Canada.
Arnold MacBurnie purchased 600 Common Shares on
September 22, 2006 at a price of $31.50 per share.
Except as described in this Offer and Circular, none of the
Offeror or RDS or, to the knowledge of the Offeror and RDS and
their respective directors and senior or executive officers
after reasonable enquiry, any of the other Persons referred to
above, has traded in any securities of Shell Canada during the
12 months preceding the date hereof. There is no Person
acting jointly or in concert with the Offeror and RDS in
connection with the transactions described in the Offer and this
Circular.
Except as described in this Offer and Circular and
Schedule B hereto, at the time of the publication of this
Offer and Circular, none of RDS or the Offeror holds, directly
or indirectly, any interest, or is attributed any voting rights,
in Shell Canada. In particular, except as described in this
Offer and Circular:
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
none of RDS, the Offeror nor, to the best knowledge of RDS and
the Offeror, any of the Persons listed in Schedule B hereto
or any associate or majority-owned subsidiary of RDS or any of
the Persons so listed in Schedule B hereto, beneficially
owns any Common Shares; and
|
30
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
none of RDS, the Offeror nor, to the best knowledge of RDS and
the Offeror, any of the Persons listed in Schedule B hereto
nor any associate or majority-owned subsidiary of RDS or
pension, profit-sharing or similar plan of RDS or the Offeror
has effected any transaction in the Common Shares during the
60 days prior to the filing of this Offer and Circular with
the SEC.
|
Except as described in this Offer and Circular, none of RDS, the
Offeror nor, to the best knowledge of RDS and the Offeror, any
of the Persons listed in Schedule B hereto, has any
agreement, arrangement or understanding with any other Person
with respect to the securities of Shell Canada.
Except as described in this Offer and Circular, there have been
no material contacts, negotiations or transactions within the
past two years between RDS, the Offeror or, to the best
knowledge of RDS, the Offeror and Shell Canada, any of the
Persons listed in Schedule B hereto, on the one hand, and
Shell Canada and/or its affiliates (or any Person not affiliated
with Shell Canada who would have a direct interest in such
matters), on the other hand, concerning a merger, consolidation
or acquisition, takeover offer or other acquisition of
securities, an election of directors or a sale or other transfer
of a material amount of assets of Shell Canada.
|
|
10.
|
Commitments
to Acquire Common Shares
|
Other than pursuant to the Offer, there are no commitments to
acquire equity securities of Shell Canada by the Offeror or RDS
or, to the knowledge of the Offeror and RDS and their respective
directors and senior officers after reasonable enquiry, by:
(a) any of the directors and senior officers of the Offeror
or RDS; (b) any of their respective associates;
(c) any Person who beneficially owns (directly or
indirectly) more than 10% of any class of the Offerors or
RDSs equity securities; or (d) any Person acting
jointly or in concert with the Offeror and/or RDS.
The Board of Directors has informed the Offeror that the
directors of Shell Canada intend to deposit pursuant to the
terms of the Offer any Common Shares owned by them as of the
Expiry Time.
|
|
11.
|
Fairness
of the Proposed Transaction
|
The boards of directors of the Offeror and RDS believe that the
Offer is fair to the Shareholders. In reaching this conclusion,
the Offeror and RDS noted the CIBC World Markets Valuation, the
CIBC World Markets Fairness Opinion delivered to the Special
Committee of the Board of Directors of Shell Canada, the
recommendation of the Board of Directors and the factors being
considered by, and the analyses and conclusions being made by,
the Board of Directors and have expressly adopted these factors,
analyses and conclusions. See also Section 6 of this
Circular, Reasons to Accept the Offer.
|
|
12.
|
CIBC
World Markets Valuation and CIBC World Markets Fairness
Opinion
|
Selection
of CIBC World Markets
The Offer constitutes an insider bid for the
purposes of
Rule 61-501
and
Regulation Q-27
(collectively, the Rules). In accordance with the
provisions of the Rules, the Offeror was required to obtain, at
its own expense, a formal valuation of the Common Shares
prepared in accordance with the Rules by a valuator who is
independent of RDS and the Offeror and who is qualified to
provide such a valuation. Under the Rules, the Special Committee
was required to:
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
determine who the valuator would be;
|
|
|
(b)
|
supervise the preparation of the formal valuation of the Common
Shares; and
|
|
|
(c)
|
use its best efforts to ensure that the formal valuation was
completed and provided to the Offeror in a timely manner.
|
In the Proposal, RDS requested that the Board of Directors
establish a special committee of independent directors to
supervise the preparation of a formal valuation and undertook to
meet the costs of the formal valuation. Accordingly, the Special
Committee considered who should be invited to submit a proposal
to prepare the formal valuation and act as financial advisor to
the Special Committee. The Special Committee considered a number
of potential valuators and ultimately invited CIBC World Markets
to make such a proposal. CIBC World Markets submitted such a
proposal indicating, among other things, its qualifications to
prepare a formal valuation. The Special Committee met with
representatives of CIBC World Markets for the purposes of
reviewing their proposal and made enquires of them as to CIBC
World Markets qualifications and independence.
After deliberation, the Special Committee determined based in
part on certain representations made to it by CIBC World
Markets that CIBC World Markets was independent and qualified to
prepare a formal valuation and should
31
be retained as financial advisor to the Special Committee for
the purposes of, among other things, preparing and delivering to
the Special Committee a formal valuation of the Common Shares
and an opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of
view, of the consideration offered to Shareholders under the
Proposal or any variation thereof. Accordingly, the Special
Committee directed Shell Canada to enter into an engagement
letter with CIBC World Markets to this effect. Shell Canada
entered into such an engagement letter (the Engagement
Letter) with CIBC World Markets dated October 28,
2006 which provided, among other things, that the services of
CIBC World Markets would be provided under the supervision and
direction of the Special Committee.
The Engagement Letter provides for the payment of fees to CIBC
World Markets of $250,000 as an engagement and work fee upon
execution of the Engagement Letter, $1,500,000 upon delivery to
the Special Committee of a preliminary value analysis of the
Common Shares, $3,000,000 upon delivery to the Special Committee
of the CIBC World Markets Valuation, $1,000,000 upon delivery to
the Special Committee of the CIBC World Markets Fairness Opinion
and $250,000 for each subsequent opinion requested by the
Special Committee as to the fairness, from a financial point of
view, of the consideration under an offer to Shareholders. The
fees paid to CIBC World Markets under the Engagement Letter were
agreed between CIBC World Markets and the Special Committee.
None of the fees payable to CIBC World Markets are contingent
upon the conclusions reached by CIBC World Markets in the
CIBC World Markets Valuation or the CIBC World Markets Fairness
Opinion or on the completion of the Offer. In the Engagement
Letter, Shell Canada has agreed to indemnify CIBC World Markets
in respect of certain liabilities that might arise out of its
engagement and to reimburse it for its reasonable expenses.
CIBC
World Markets Valuation
The following summary is qualified in its entirety by the full
text of the CIBC World Markets Valuation which sets forth the
assumptions made, matters considered and limitations on the
review undertaken in connection with the CIBC World Markets
Valuation, and which is included as Schedule A to this
Circular. The Offeror urges Shareholders to read the CIBC World
Markets Valuation in its entirety.
Credentials
of CIBC World Markets
CIBC World Markets is one of Canadas largest investment
banking firms with operations in all facets of corporate and
government finance, mergers and acquisitions, equity and fixed
income sales and trading and investment research. The CIBC World
Markets Valuation and the CIBC World Markets Fairness Opinion
have been approved for release by a committee of CIBC World
Markets managing directors and internal counsel, each of whom is
experienced in merger, acquisition, divestiture and valuation
matters.
Relationships
with Interested Parties
None of CIBC World Markets or its affiliates:
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
is an issuer insider, associated entity
or affiliated entity of RDS or the Offeror as such
terms are used in
Rule 61-501;
|
|
|
(b)
|
is a financial advisor to RDS or the Offeror in connection with
the Offer;
|
|
|
(c)
|
is a manager or co-manager of a soliciting dealer group formed
to solicit acceptances of the Offer or will it, as a member of
such group, perform services beyond the customary soliciting
dealers functions nor will it receive more than the per
share or per shareholder fee payable to other members of the
group; or
|
|
|
(d)
|
has a financial incentive with respect to the conclusions
reached in the CIBC World Markets Valuation or the CIBC World
Markets Fairness Opinion nor has a material financial interest
in the completion of the Offer.
|
Prior to entering into the Engagement Letter, CIBC World Markets
has provided various financial advisory services to Shell Canada
in connection with transactions unrelated to the Offer. The fees
payable to CIBC World Markets by Shell Canada were not
financially material to CIBC World Markets. CIBC World Markets
acts as a trader and dealer, both as principal and agent, in
major financial markets and, as such, may have had, and may in
the future have, positions in the securities of Shell Canada,
RDS or their affiliates and, from time to time, may have
executed, or may execute, transactions on behalf of such
entities. CIBC World Markets is an indirect subsidiary of
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) and CIBC
or its affiliated entities have made or may in the future make
loans or provide other financial services in the normal course
to Shell Canada, RDS or their affiliates.
32
Scope
of Review
In preparing the CIBC World Markets Valuation, CIBC World
Markets reviewed certain publicly available information and
financial statements and non-public information relating to
Shell Canada; reviewed information relating to the business,
operations, financial performance and, where applicable, stock
market data and research publications relating to Shell Canada
and other selected comparable companies; held discussions with
senior management of Shell Canada; held discussions with
independent reservoir engineers and other industry experts; held
discussions with RDS and its financial advisors; held
discussions with legal counsel to the Special Committee; and
carried out other investigative exercises, more specifically
described in the CIBC World Markets Valuation.
General
Assumption and Limitations
With the Special Committees permission and subject to the
exercise of CIBC World Markets professional judgment, CIBC
World Markets relied upon the completeness, accuracy and fair
presentation of all data and other information obtained by it
from public sources or provided to it by Shell Canada or its
advisors or otherwise obtained by it. The CIBC World Markets
Valuation is conditional upon such completeness, accuracy and
fair presentation. Except as provided in the CIBC World Markets
Valuation, CIBC World Markets did not attempt to verify
independently the accuracy, completeness or fairness of
presentation of any of such data or information. Shell Canada
has represented to CIBC World Markets, in a certificate of two
senior officers of Shell Canada dated the date of the CIBC World
Markets Valuation that, among other things, the information,
data and other materials provided to CIBC World Markets by or on
behalf of Shell Canada (the Shell Canada
Information), were complete and correct at the date the
Shell Canada Information was provided to CIBC World Markets and
that, since the date of the Shell Canada Information, there has
been no material change, financial or otherwise, in the
financial condition, assets, liabilities (contingent or
otherwise), business, operations or prospects of Shell Canada
and its subsidiaries and no material change has occurred in the
Shell Canada Information or any part thereof which would have or
which would reasonably be expected to have a material effect on
the CIBC World Markets Valuation or the CIBC World Markets
Fairness Opinion.
The CIBC World Markets Valuation was given as of
January 22, 2007 on the basis of securities markets,
economic and general business and financial conditions
prevailing on that date and the condition and prospects,
financial and otherwise, of Shell Canada as they were reflected
in the Shell Canada Information provided to CIBC World Markets
and as they were represented to CIBC World Markets in their
discussions with management of Shell Canada and its advisors.
Although CIBC World Markets reserves the right to change or
withdraw the CIBC World Markets Valuation if it learns that any
of the information relied upon in preparing the CIBC World
Markets Valuation was inaccurate, incomplete or misleading in
any material respect, CIBC World Markets disclaims any
obligation to change or withdraw the CIBC World Markets
Valuation, to advise any person of any change that may come to
its attention, or update the CIBC World Markets Valuation after
such date. In preparing the CIBC World Markets Valuation, CIBC
World Markets was not authorized to solicit, and did not
solicit, interest from any other potential party with respect to
the acquisition of Common Shares or any business combinations or
other extraordinary transaction involving Shell Canada.
The CIBC World Markets Valuation is not to be construed as a
recommendation to any Shareholder to accept or reject the Offer.
In the CIBC World Markets Valuation, CIBC World Markets stated
that it believes that its financial analyses must be considered
as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and the
factors considered by it, without considering all factors and
analyses together, could create a misleading view of the process
underlying the CIBC World Markets Valuation. The preparation of
a valuation is complex and is not necessarily susceptible to
partial analysis or summary description and any attempt to do so
could lead to undue emphasis on any particular factor or
analysis.
Fair
Market Value
For purposes of the CIBC World Markets Valuation, fair market
value is defined as the monetary consideration that, in an open
and unrestricted market, a prudent and informed buyer would pay
to a prudent and informed seller, each acting at arms
length with each other and under no compulsion to act. CIBC
World Markets made no downward adjustment to the fair market
value of the Common Shares to reflect the liquidity of the
Common Shares or the fact that the Common Shares do not form
part of a controlling interest.
Valuation
Methodology
CIBC World Markets approached the valuation of the Common Shares
by applying two principal methodologies:
33
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
a discounted cash flow (DCF) approach; and
|
|
|
(b)
|
a sum of the parts net asset value (NAV)
approach
|
In addition, CIBC World Markets reviewed historical trading data
for Shell Canada, bid premia from precedent transactions and
research analyst target prices.
CIBC World Markets prepared a comprehensive DCF analysis of
Shell Canada to assist in determining the fair market value of
the Common Shares. CIBC World Markets believed that the DCF
approach was the most appropriate methodology for estimating the
en bloc value of Shell Canada and benchmarked the
results against other valuation methodologies. CIBC World
Markets further believed that the DCF approach is the most
broadly used valuation methodology in the oil and gas industry.
The DCF approach reflects the growth prospects and risks
inherent in Shell Canadas operations by taking into
account the future free cash flow generating capability of its
assets.
The present value of the unlevered after-tax free cash flows
derived from the DCF analysis represents the aggregate value of
Shell Canadas operating assets. To arrive at an equity
value, and subsequently an equity value per share, CIBC World
Markets made a number of adjustments. These adjustments
included, among other things, adjustments for net debt as of
December 31, 2006, potential future tax deferred benefits,
certain inventory adjustments, present value of unfunded pension
liabilities and the estimated present value of future asset
retirement obligations not already reflected in the DCF analysis.
The equity value per Common Share derived from the DCF analysis
was determined to be in the range of approximately $42 to $47.
Using the NAV approach, a value for Shell Canada was estimated
by separately considering the value of each operating,
development, exploration and financial asset. The individual
asset values were estimated utilizing primarily precedent
transaction analyses and comparable company trading analyses.
The market trading multiples of public companies that operate in
businesses similar to those of Shell Canada were reviewed and
used to estimate individual asset values. The multiples used
included measures of (i) total enterprise value
(TEV) to earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) referred to
as TEV/EBITDA, (ii) Adjusted TEV to the
quantity of net proved reserves, and (iii) Adjusted TEV to
barrels per day of net current production. Each of these
multiples is frequently observed by industry participants and
the investment community as key measures for valuing assets or
companies in various sectors of the oil and gas industry.
The results of the comparable companies approach were adjusted
for a premium based on comparable
change-of-control
transactions to reflect an en bloc value for each of
the assets. CIBC World Markets applied premia to TEV in its
analysis for the various assets given that Shell Canadas
net debt is held at the corporate level and not allocated to any
particular asset or division. CIBC World Markets reviewed both
the premia to market trading values for shares and premia to TEV
of a number of precedent transactions in the Canadian oil and
gas industry and for other large Canadian acquisition
transactions to determine appropriate premia with regard to
Shell Canadas assets.
Under the NAV approach, the value of each asset was summed to
produce a total asset value. The present value of Shell
Canadas Go to Market cost savings, as well as
the proceeds received from the exercise of stock options and
other employee stock incentive plans were added to this value.
Shell Canadas net debt (long term debt plus working
capital deficit) and an estimate of the present value of
corporate expenses that are not directly assignable to each of
the individual assets were deducted from these values in order
to arrive at an equity value per Common Share.
The results of the NAV analysis are summarized in the CIBC World
Markets Valuation and indicate an equity value range of
approximately $42 to $48 per Common Share.
Distinctive
Material Benefits to RDS
The value of certain synergies is reflected in some of the
valuation methodologies utilized. CIBC World Markets also
considered whether any distinctive material benefits that are
unique to RDS would accrue from its acquisition of all the
Shares. Possible benefits or cost savings might accrue to RDS
with respect to the following areas: (i) the consolidation
of the human resources and infrastructure required for the
development of the SURE Northern Energy oil sands leases owned
by RDS and the accelerated development thereof, (ii) the
integration of Shell Canadas oil sands business with the
RDS downstream businesses in the United States, (iii) the
elimination of certain general and administrative functions, and
(iv) the opportunity to utilize consolidated tax planning
strategies. CIBC World Markets did not have sufficient financial
information or analysis from RDS to quantify such benefits but
believes they could be material in the aggregate.
34
Valuation
Summary and Conclusion
In arriving at an opinion of fair market value of the Common
Shares, CIBC World Markets did not attribute any particular
weight to any specific factor but made qualitative judgments
based on experience in rendering such opinions and on
circumstances then prevailing as to the significance and
relevance of each factor. CIBC World Markets did, however,
weight each valuation approach differently and ascribed the
greatest amount of importance to the DCF approach.
Based upon and subject to the factors set out in the CIBC World
Markets Valuation, CIBC World Markets expressed the opinion
that, as of January 22, 2007, the fair market value of the
Common Shares was in the range of $42 to $48 per Common Share.
CIBC
World Markets Fairness Opinion
In the CIBC World Markets Fairness Opinion, CIBC World Markets
stated that it is of the opinion that, as of January 22,
2007 the consideration under the Offer is fair, from a financial
point of view, to Shareholders. A summary of the CIBC World
Markets Fairness Opinion is included in the Directors
Circular and the full text of the CIBC World Markets Fairness
Opinion is included as Schedule B thereto. The Offeror
urges Shareholders to read the CIBC World Markets Fairness
Opinion in its entirety.
|
|
13.
|
Price
Range and Trading Volume of Common Shares
|
The Common Shares are listed and posted for trading on the TSX
under the symbol SHC. The following table sets
forth, for the monthly and quarterly periods indicated, the high
and low closing prices of the Common Shares and the volume of
trading on the TSX, according to published sources:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
000s
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 1 to 5
|
|
|
45.00
|
|
|
|
44.90
|
|
|
|
10.806
|
|
January
|
|
|
45.37
|
|
|
|
42.40
|
|
|
|
57,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
|
43.85
|
|
|
|
43.13
|
|
|
|
10,722
|
|
November
|
|
|
43.35
|
|
|
|
42.68
|
|
|
|
25,637
|
|
October
|
|
|
42.91
|
|
|
|
29.14
|
|
|
|
49,219
|
|
September
|
|
|
36.64
|
|
|
|
30.40
|
|
|
|
11,956
|
|
August
|
|
|
40.47
|
|
|
|
35.80
|
|
|
|
10,004
|
|
July
|
|
|
42.50
|
|
|
|
38.63
|
|
|
|
8,301
|
|
June
|
|
|
41.50
|
|
|
|
38.18
|
|
|
|
6,842
|
|
May
|
|
|
42.21
|
|
|
|
38.08
|
|
|
|
9,860
|
|
April
|
|
|
45.84
|
|
|
|
41.65
|
|
|
|
7,610
|
|
March
|
|
|
41.72
|
|
|
|
37.92
|
|
|
|
7,490
|
|
February
|
|
|
44.85
|
|
|
|
38.15
|
|
|
|
10,353
|
|
January
|
|
|
46.90
|
|
|
|
40.18
|
|
|
|
10,156
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
000s
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
|
42.05
|
|
|
|
35.34
|
|
|
|
6,767
|
|
November
|
|
|
37.49
|
|
|
|
33.90
|
|
|
|
7,032
|
|
October
|
|
|
41.25
|
|
|
|
32.88
|
|
|
|
9,921
|
|
September
|
|
|
41.30
|
|
|
|
39.72
|
|
|
|
6,820
|
|
August
|
|
|
39.98
|
|
|
|
36.49
|
|
|
|
8,226
|
|
July
|
|
|
35.83
|
|
|
|
33.51
|
|
|
|
7,317
|
|
June
|
|
|
33.95
|
|
|
|
28.93
|
|
|
|
7,908
|
|
May
|
|
|
29.08
|
|
|
|
26.92
|
|
|
|
5,614
|
|
April
|
|
|
29.50
|
|
|
|
27.08
|
|
|
|
8,439
|
|
March
|
|
|
31.31
|
|
|
|
28.66
|
|
|
|
9,898
|
|
February
|
|
|
28.52
|
|
|
|
25.44
|
|
|
|
15,924
|
|
January
|
|
|
26.42
|
|
|
|
25.43
|
|
|
|
6,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1
February 5
|
|
|
45.37
|
|
|
|
42.40
|
|
|
|
68,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1 December 31
|
|
|
43.85
|
|
|
|
29.14
|
|
|
|
85,578
|
|
July 1 September 30
|
|
|
42.50
|
|
|
|
30.40
|
|
|
|
30,262
|
|
April 1 June 30
|
|
|
45.84
|
|
|
|
38.08
|
|
|
|
24,311
|
|
January 1 March 31
|
|
|
46.90
|
|
|
|
37.92
|
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1 December 31
|
|
|
42.05
|
|
|
|
32.88
|
|
|
|
23,719
|
|
July 1 September 30
|
|
|
41.30
|
|
|
|
33.51
|
|
|
|
22,362
|
|
April 1 June
30(1)
|
|
|
33.95
|
|
|
|
26.92
|
|
|
|
21,962
|
|
January 1 March
31(1)
|
|
|
31.31
|
|
|
|
25.43
|
|
|
|
32,017
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Shell Canada effected a 3:1 stock
split on June 21, 2005. Share prices previous to this date
have been adjusted to reflect this split.
|
On October 20, 2006, the last trading day immediately prior
to the public announcement of RDS intention to make the
Offer, the closing price of the Common Shares on the TSX was
$32.80. The Offer price of $45.00 per Common Share in cash
represents a premium of: 37.2% to the October 20, 2006
closing price of the Common Shares on the TSX; and 44.7% to the
average closing price of the Common Shares on the TSX for the
30 calendar days preceding and including October 20,
2006.
Neither the Offeror nor RDS has purchased any Common Shares in
the two years preceding the date of this Circular.
|
|
14.
|
Dividends
and Dividend Policy
|
According to publicly available information, the declaration of
dividends is at the discretion of the Board of Directors, and,
subject to the liquidity and solvency tests set forth in the
CBCA, there are no restrictions on dividend payout. During the
term of the Support Agreement, Shell Canada has agreed to
neither declare nor pay any dividends
36
(other than quarterly cash dividends of $0.11 per Common Share
in accordance with Shell Canadas past practice). The
following dividends have been declared and paid by Shell Canada
during the last two years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Dividend
|
|
Date
|
|
per Common Share
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
December 15
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
September 15
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
June 15
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
March 15
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
|
|
December 15
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
September 15
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
June 15
|
|
$
|
0.0833
|
|
March 15
|
|
$
|
0.0833
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Shell Canada effected a 3:1 stock
split on June 21, 2005. Dividend amounts previous to this
date have been adjusted to reflect this split.
|
On January 24, 2007 Shell Canada declared a dividend of
$0.11 per Common Share payable on March 15, 2007 to
Shareholders of record as at February 15, 2007.
In 2005, Shell Canada repurchased a total of 1,205,841 common
shares in connection with its last normal course issuer bid.
970,641 common shares were repurchased in the first quarter of
2005 and 235,200 common shares were repurchased in the second
quarter of 2005. The range of prices paid in 2005 was $25.48 to
$31.23. The first quarter range of prices paid was $25.48 to
$31.23 and the second quarter range of prices paid was $26.92 to
$28.90. The average purchase price for 2005 was $27.84. The
average purchase price for the first quarter was $27.80 and the
average purchase price for the second quarter was $28.03. These
transactions preceded the 3:1 share split which became effective
on June 21, 2005, and as such, the number of common shares
repurchased and the share prices have been adjusted to reflect
this split. Shell Canada did not repurchase any common shares in
2006.
|
|
15.
|
Previous
Distributions of Common Shares
|
Based on publicly available information which has been confirmed
by Shell Canada, during the five years prior to the date hereof
Shell Canada has not completed any distribution of Common Shares
(excluding Common Shares distributed pursuant to the exercise of
employee stock options, warrants and conversion rights).
|
|
16.
|
Effect of
the Offer on the Market for Common Shares; Stock Exchange
Listing; and Public Disclosure by Shell Canada
|
The purchase of Common Shares by the Offeror pursuant to the
Offer will reduce the number of Common Shares that might
otherwise trade publicly and will reduce the number of
Shareholders and, depending on the number of Common Shares
acquired by the Offeror, could materially adversely affect the
liquidity and market value of the remaining Common Shares held
by the public.
The rules and regulations of the TSX establish certain criteria
which, if not met, could, upon successful completion of the
Offer, lead to the delisting of the Common Shares from the TSX.
Among such criteria is the number of shareholders, the number of
Common Shares publicly held and the aggregate market value of
the Common Shares publicly held. Depending on the number of
Common Shares purchased under the Offer, it is possible that the
Common Shares would fail to meet the criteria for continued
listing on the TSX. If this were to happen, the Common Shares
could be delisted and this could, in turn, materially adversely
affect the market or result in a lack of an established market
for such Common Shares. If permitted by applicable Law,
subsequent to completion of the Offer or any Compulsory
Acquisition or Subsequent Acquisition Transaction, if necessary,
the Offeror intends to apply to delist the Common Shares from
the TSX. If the Common Shares are delisted from the TSX, the
extent of the public market for the Common Shares and the
availability of price or other quotations would depend upon the
number of shareholders, the number of Common Shares publicly
held and the aggregate market value of the Common Shares
remaining at such time, the interest in maintaining a market in
Common Shares on the part of securities firms, whether Shell
Canada remains subject to public reporting requirements in
Canada and other factors.
37
After the purchase of the Common Shares under the Offer, Shell
Canada may cease to be subject to the public reporting and proxy
solicitation requirements of the CBCA and the securities Laws of
certain provinces and territories of Canada. Furthermore, it may
be possible for Shell Canada to request the elimination of the
public reporting requirements of any province where a small
number of Shareholders reside. Finally, if permitted by the U.S.
Exchange Act, subsequent to the completion of the Offer and any
Compulsory Acquisition or Subsequent Acquisition Transaction,
the registration of Shell Canada under the U.S. Exchange Act may
be terminated and Shell Canada will no longer be subject to the
periodic reporting obligations of the U.S. Exchange Act or
otherwise be subject to the U.S. federal securities Laws
applicable to public companies.
If permitted by applicable Law, subsequent to the completion of
the Offer and any Compulsory Acquisition or Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction, the Offeror intends to cause Shell
Canada to cease to be a reporting issuer for
purposes of relevant Canadian securities Laws and cease to be a
reporting company under U.S. federal securities Laws. Shell
Canada is already fully consolidated in the RDS consolidated
financial statements. A minority interest is recognized to
reflect the fact that RDS owns 78% of the net assets of Shell
Canada instead of 100%. Under IFRS, the proposed acquisition of
the Common Shares will be treated as a transaction between
shareholders of Shell Canada whereby the difference between the
purchase price and the book value of the minority interest is
charged to RDS shareholders equity. The overall impact of
the transaction on the RDS consolidated financial statements
will therefore be an increase in net debt by the amount of the
purchase price, a reduction in minority interests by the book
value and a reduction in equity attributable to shareholders of
RDS by the balancing amount. However, under U.S. GAAP the
difference between the purchase price and the book value of the
minority interest in Shell Canada will be recognized as a fair
value adjustment to the assets and liabilities of Shell Canada
with any remaining difference recorded to goodwill. This
difference in accounting treatment will be included in RDS
IFRS and U.S. GAAP reconciliation disclosures going forward.
|
|
17.
|
Arrangements,
Agreements or Understandings
|
Except as provided below, there are no arrangements, agreements
or understandings, formal or informal, made or proposed to be
made between the Offeror and any of the directors, senior
officers or securityholders of Shell Canada and no payments or
other benefits are proposed to be made or given by the Offeror
by way of compensation for loss of office or as to such
directors or senior officers remaining in or retiring from
office if the Offer is successful.
Under the Support Agreement, the Offeror has agreed, without
limiting the obligations of Shell Canada thereunder, not to
interfere with or otherwise restrict the performance by Shell
Canada and its subsidiaries of their obligations to their
respective employees.
The Support Agreement also provides that following the Effective
Date, provided that the Minimum Condition is satisfied and not
waived, the Offeror shall be entitled to designate all of the
members of the Board of Directors, and any committees thereof
and Shell Canada shall not frustrate the Offerors attempts
to do so and shall co-operate with the Offeror to secure the
resignations of incumbent directors on the date specified by the
Offeror and facilitate the Offerors designees to be
elected or appointed to the Board of Directors without the
necessity of calling a meeting of Shareholders.
In addition, under the Support Agreement, the Offeror has agreed
that from and after the Effective Date, the Offeror shall, and
shall cause Shell Canada (or its successor) to, indemnify the
current and former directors and officers of Shell Canada and
its subsidiaries to the same extent to which such current and
former directors and officers are indemnified by Shell Canada as
of the date of the Support Agreement. From and after the
Effective Date, for a period of six years from the Expiry Time,
the Offeror has agreed to cause to be maintained Shell
Canadas current directors and officers
insurance policy or a reasonably equivalent policy, for all
present and former directors and officers of Shell Canada and
its subsidiaries, covering claims made prior to or within six
years after the Expiry Time.
Routine
Transactions
In the course of its regular business activities, Shell Canada
enters into routine transactions with affiliates of RDS. Such
transactions are arms length transactions at market rates.
The transactions include purchases of crude oil, petroleum
products, chemicals and service agreements and sales of natural
gas, petroleum products and chemicals. The total amounts of such
purchases were approximately $6,529 million and
$5,507 million as at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, with $199 million and $204 million, as
at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, payable by Shell
Canada in respect of such purchases. The total amounts of such
sales were $2,435 million and $2,343 million as at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, with approximately
$441 million and $245 million, as at December 31, 2006
and 2005, respectively, receivable by Shell Canada in respect of
such sales.
38
Contacts,
Negotiations or Transactions
Except as described in this Circular, there have been no
material contacts, negotiations or transactions within the past
two years between RDS or the Offeror or, to the best knowledge
of RDS or the Offeror, any of the Persons listed in
Schedule B hereto, on the one hand, and Shell Canada and/or
its affiliates (or any person not affiliated with Shell Canada
who would have a direct interest in such matters), on the other
hand, concerning a merger, consolidation or acquisition,
takeover offer or other acquisition of securities, an election
of directors or a sale or other transfer of a material amount of
assets of Shell Canada.
Except as disclosed herein, none of RDS, the Offeror or Shell
Canada is aware of any firm offer by an unaffiliated third party
during the past two years with respect to a merger or
consolidation of Shell Canada, the sale or other transfer of all
or any substantial portion of the assets of Shell Canada, or a
purchase of securities of Shell Canada that would enable such
person to exercise control over Shell Canada.
|
|
18.
|
Certain
Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations
|
In the opinion of Stikeman Elliott LLP, the following is a
summary of the principal Canadian federal income tax
considerations generally applicable under the Tax Act, as of the
date hereof, to a Shareholder who sells Common Shares pursuant
to the Offer or otherwise disposes of Common Shares pursuant to
certain transactions described in Section 21 of this
Circular, Acquisition of Common Shares Not Deposited
and who, at all relevant times, for the purposes of the Tax Act:
(a) deals at arms length with the Offeror and Shell
Canada; (b) is not affiliated with the Offeror or Shell
Canada; and (c) holds the Common Shares as capital property.
Common Shares will generally be considered to be capital
property to a Shareholder unless the Shareholder holds such
Common Shares in the course of carrying on a business or the
Shareholder has acquired such Common Shares in one or more
transactions considered to be an adventure in the nature of
trade. Certain Shareholders who are residents of Canada for the
purposes of the Tax Act and whose Common Shares might not
otherwise be capital property may, in certain circumstances, be
entitled to make the irrevocable election permitted by
subsection 39(4) of the Tax Act to have their Common Shares and
every other Canadian security (as defined in the Tax
Act) owned by such Shareholder in the taxation year in which the
election is made, and in all subsequent taxation years, deemed
to be capital property. Such Shareholders should consult their
own tax advisors for advice with respect to whether an election
under subsection 39(4) of the Tax Act is available and advisable
in their particular circumstances.
This summary is based on the current provisions of the Tax Act
and counsels understanding of the administrative practices
of the CRA published in writing prior to the date hereof. This
summary also takes into account all specific proposals to amend
the Tax Act and the regulations thereunder which have been
publicly announced by or on behalf of the Minister of Finance
(Canada) prior to the date hereof (the Proposed
Amendments), and assumes that all Proposed Amendments will
be enacted in the form proposed. However, there can be no
assurance that the Proposed Amendments will be enacted in the
form proposed, or at all. This summary is not exhaustive of all
possible Canadian federal income tax considerations and, except
for the Proposed Amendments, does not take into account or
anticipate any changes in Law, whether by judicial, governmental
or legislative action or decision, or changes in the
administrative practices of the CRA, nor does it take into
account provincial, territorial or foreign income tax
legislation or considerations, which may differ significantly
from the Canadian federal income tax considerations described
herein.
This summary is not applicable to a Shareholder that is:
(a) a financial institution as defined in the
Tax Act for purposes of the
mark-to-market
property rules; (b) a specified financial
institution as defined in the Tax Act; or (c) a
Shareholder an interest in which is a tax shelter
investment as defined in the Tax Act. In addition, this
summary does not address all issues relevant to Shareholders who
acquired their Common Shares on the exercise of an employee
stock option. Such Shareholders should consult their own tax
advisors.
A Shareholder who acquired or is deemed to have acquired Common
Shares prior to 1972, or acquired or is deemed to have acquired
Common Shares in one or more non-arms length transactions
from a person who held such shares prior to 1972, should consult
his or her own tax advisor as to the impact of certain
transitional rules on the following description of the Canadian
federal income tax consequences to the Shareholder. The
transitional rules are not considered below.
This summary is not exhaustive of all Canadian federal income
tax considerations and is of a general nature only. This summary
is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal
or tax advice to any particular Shareholder, and no
representations with respect to the tax consequences to any
particular Shareholder are made. Accordingly, Shareholders
should consult their own tax advisors with respect to their
particular circumstances,
39
including the application and effect of the income and other
tax Laws of any country, province, state or other local tax
authority
Shareholders
Resident in Canada
The following portion of the summary is generally applicable to
a Shareholder who at all relevant times, for purposes of the Tax
Act and at all relevant times is, or is deemed to be, resident
in Canada (a Resident Shareholder).
Sale
Pursuant to the Offer
A Resident Shareholder who disposes of Common Shares to the
Offeror pursuant to the Offer will realize a capital gain (or
capital loss) equal to the amount by which the proceeds of
disposition, net of any reasonable costs of disposition, exceed
(or are less than) the adjusted cost base of the Common Shares
to the Resident Shareholder at the time of such disposition.
A Resident Shareholder generally will be required to include in
computing its income for a taxation year one-half of the amount
of any capital gain (a taxable capital gain)
realized in such year. Subject to and in accordance with the
provisions of the Tax Act, a Resident Shareholder will be
required to deduct one-half of the amount of any capital loss
(an allowable capital loss) realized in a taxation
year from taxable capital gains realized by the Resident
Shareholder in such year. Allowable capital losses in excess of
taxable capital gains for a taxation year may be carried back
and deducted in any of the three preceding taxation years or
carried forward and deducted in any subsequent taxation year
against net taxable capital gains realized in such years, to the
extent and under the circumstances specified in the Tax Act.
In general, a capital loss otherwise arising upon the
disposition of a Common Share by a Resident Shareholder that is
a corporation may be reduced by dividends previously received or
deemed to have been received by it on such Common Share, to the
extent and under the circumstances prescribed in the Tax Act.
Similar rules may apply where a Common Share is owned by a
partnership or trust of which a corporation, trust or
partnership is a member or beneficiary. Resident Shareholders to
whom these rules may be relevant should consult their own tax
advisors.
A Resident Shareholder that is throughout the taxation year a
Canadian-controlled private corporation (as defined
in the Tax Act) may be liable to pay an additional
62/3%
refundable tax on certain investment income, including taxable
capital gains.
Capital gains realized by an individual or a trust, other than
certain specified trusts, may be subject to alternative minimum
tax under the Tax Act. Resident Shareholders should consult
their own tax advisors with respect to the alternative minimum
tax provisions.
Compulsory
Acquisition of Common Shares
As described under Section 21 of this Circular,
Acquisition of Common Shares Not Deposited
Compulsory Acquisition, the Offeror may, in certain
circumstances, acquire Common Shares not deposited under the
Offer pursuant to a Compulsory Acquisition. A Resident
Shareholder who disposes of Common Shares in such circumstances
will realize a capital gain (or a capital loss) generally
calculated in the same manner and with the same tax consequences
as described above under Sale Pursuant to the Offer.
A Resident Shareholder who dissents in a Compulsory Acquisition
and is entitled to receive the fair value of its Common Shares
will be considered to have disposed of the Common Shares for
proceeds of disposition equal to the amount fixed as such by the
court (excluding the amount of any interest awarded by the
court). As a result, such dissenting Resident Shareholder will
realize a capital gain (or a capital loss) generally calculated
in the same manner and with the tax consequences as described
above under Sale Pursuant to the Offer. Any interest
awarded to a dissenting Resident Shareholder by a court will be
included in computing such Resident Shareholders income
for the purposes of the Tax Act.
Resident Shareholders whose Common Shares may be acquired
pursuant to a Compulsory Acquisition should consult their own
tax advisors.
Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction
As described under Section 21 of this Circular,
Acquisition of Common Shares Not Deposited
Subsequent Acquisition Transaction, if the Offeror does
not acquire all of the Common Shares pursuant to the Offer or by
means of a Compulsory Acquisition, the Offeror may propose other
means of acquiring the remaining issued and outstanding Common
Shares. Such means include an amalgamation, capital
reorganization, share consolidation, arrangement or other
transaction. The tax treatment of a Subsequent Acquisition
Transaction to a Resident Shareholder will depend upon the
40
exact manner in which the Subsequent Acquisition Transaction is
carried out. Resident Shareholders should consult their own tax
advisors for advice with respect to the income tax consequences
to them of having their Common Shares acquired pursuant to a
Subsequent Acquisition Transaction.
A Subsequent Acquisition Transaction could be implemented by
means of an amalgamation of Shell Canada with the Offeror and/or
one or more of its affiliates pursuant to which Shareholders who
have not tendered their Common Shares under the Offer would have
their Common Shares exchanged for redeemable preference shares
of the amalgamated corporation (Redeemable Shares)
which would then be immediately redeemed for cash. In those
circumstances, a Resident Shareholder generally would not
realize a capital gain or capital loss as a result of such
exchange, and the Resident Shareholders cost of the
Redeemable Shares received would be equal to the aggregate of
the adjusted cost base of the Shares to the Resident Shareholder
immediately before the amalgamation. Upon the redemption of the
Redeemable Shares, the Resident Shareholder would be deemed to
have received a dividend (subject to the potential application
of subsection 55(2) of the Tax Act to Resident Shareholders that
are corporations, as discussed below) equal to the amount, if
any, by which the redemption price of the Redeemable Shares
exceeds their paid-up capital for the purposes of the Tax Act.
The difference between the redemption price and the amount of
the deemed dividend would be treated as proceeds of disposition
of such Redeemable Shares for the purpose of computing any
capital gain or capital loss arising on the redemption of the
Redeemable Shares. The tax consequences in respect of any such
capital gain or capital loss generally would be as described
above under Sale Pursuant to the Offer.
Subsection 55(2) of the Tax Act provides that where a Resident
Shareholder that is a corporation is deemed to receive a
dividend under the circumstances described above, all or part of
the deemed dividend may be deemed not to be a dividend and may
be treated instead as proceeds of disposition of the Redeemable
Shares for the purposes of computing the Resident
Shareholders capital gain on the disposition of such
Redeemable Shares. Accordingly, Resident Shareholders that are
corporations should consult their own tax advisors for specific
advice with respect to the potential application of this
provision to them. Subject to the potential application of this
provision, dividends deemed to be received by a Resident
Shareholder that is a corporation as a result of the redemption
of the Redeemable Shares will be included in computing the
corporations income, but normally will also be deductible
in computing the corporations taxable income.
A Resident Shareholder that is a private corporation
or a subject corporation (as such terms are defined
in the Tax Act) may be liable under Part IV of the Tax Act
to pay a refundable tax of
331/3%
on dividends deemed to be received on the Redeemable Shares to
the extent that such dividends are deductible in computing the
Resident Shareholders taxable income. Dividends deemed to
be received by a Resident Shareholder who is an individual
(including a trust) as a result of the redemption of the
Redeemable Shares will be included in computing the Resident
Shareholders income, and will be subject to the gross-up
and dividend tax credit rules generally applicable to taxable
dividends received from a taxable Canadian corporation. The
Proposed Amendments provide for an enhanced gross-up and
dividend tax credit for eligible dividends paid
after 2005 and Resident Shareholders are advised to consult
their own tax advisors regarding the implications of such
Proposed Amendments.
In the event that the Offeror decides to implement a Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction by means of an amalgamation as described
above, the Offerors current intention is to effectively
allocate to the Redeemable Shares an amount of paid-up capital
equal to the aggregate redemption price of such Redeemable
Shares, with the result that, upon the redemption of a
Redeemable Share, the holder thereof (i) would realize a
capital gain (or capital loss) to the extent that the redemption
price of such share exceeds (or is less than) the aggregate of
the adjusted cost base to the holder of such share and any
reasonable costs of disposition, and (ii) would not be
deemed to have received a dividend. However, no assurances can
be given in this regard.
Under the current administrative practice of the CRA, Resident
Shareholders who exercise their statutory right of dissent in
respect of an amalgamation should be considered to have disposed
of their Common Shares for proceeds of disposition equal to the
amount paid by the amalgamated corporation to the dissenting
Resident Shareholder in respect of such Common Shares (excluding
any interest awarded by a court). However, because of
uncertainty under the relevant legislation as to whether such
amounts paid to a dissenting Resident Shareholder would be
treated entirely as proceeds of disposition, or in part as the
payment of a deemed dividend, dissenting Resident Shareholders
should consult with their own tax advisors in this regard. Any
interest awarded to the Resident Shareholder by a court will be
included in computing the Resident Shareholders income for
the purposes of the Tax Act.
A Subsequent Acquisition Transaction could also be implemented
by means of a capital reorganization of Shell Canada pursuant to
which Resident Shareholders who have not tendered their Common
Shares under the Offer would
41
have their Common Shares exchanged for special shares of Shell
Canada (Special Shares) which would then be
immediately sold to the Offeror for cash. A Resident Shareholder
generally would not realize a capital gain or capital loss as a
result of such exchange, and the cost of the Special Shares
received would be equal to the aggregate of the adjusted cost
base of the Common Shares to the Resident Shareholder
immediately before the exchange. Upon the sale of the Special
Shares, the Resident Shareholder would realize a capital gain
(or a capital loss) calculated in the manner and subject to the
treatment described above under Sale Pursuant to the
Offer, but Resident Shareholders whose Special Shares may
be so acquired should consult their own tax advisors in this
regard.
Resident Shareholders who exercise their statutory right of
dissent in respect of a capital reorganization and are paid the
fair value of their shares by Shell Canada will be deemed to
have received a dividend to the extent that the amount received
(less the amount of any interest ordered by a court) exceeds the
paid-up capital of the Common Shares for the purposes of the Tax
Act. The difference between the amount received (less the amount
of any interest ordered by a court) and the amount of the deemed
dividend would be treated as proceeds of disposition of the
Common Shares for the purpose of computing any capital gain or
capital loss arising on the disposition of the Common Shares.
The tax consequences in respect of any such capital gain or
capital loss generally would be as described above under
Sale Pursuant to the Offer. The tax treatment of any
dividend deemed to have been received in such circumstances
generally will be the same as the tax treatment of dividends
deemed to have been received on the redemption of Redeemable
Shares, as described above.
A Subsequent Acquisition Transaction could also be implemented
by means of a share consolidation of Shell Canada pursuant to
which Shareholders who have not tendered their Common Shares
under the Offer would have their Common Shares exchanged for a
fraction of a Common Share in respect of which such Shareholders
would receive a cash payment. A Shareholder whose Common Shares
are consolidated and who receives a cash payment from Shell
Canada would generally be deemed to have received a taxable
dividend (subject to the potential application of subsection
55(2) of the Tax Act to Shareholders that are corporations, as
discussed above) equal to the amount by which such cash payment
exceeds the paid-up capital for the purposes of the Tax Act of
the Shares that are exchanged. The difference between the cash
received and the amount of the deemed dividend would be treated
as proceeds of disposition of the Common Shares for the purpose
of computing any capital gain or capital loss arising on the
disposition of such Common Shares. The tax consequences in
respect of any such capital gain or capital loss generally would
be as described above under Sale Pursuant to the
Offer. The tax treatment of any dividend deemed to have
been received in such circumstances generally would be the same
as the tax treatment of dividends deemed to have been received
on the redemption of Redeemable Shares, as described above.
Shareholders who exercise their statutory right of dissent in
respect of a consolidation and are paid the fair value of their
Common Shares by Shell Canada will be deemed to have received a
dividend to the extent that the amount received (less the amount
of any interest ordered by a court) exceeds the paid-up capital
of the Common Shares for the purposes of the Tax Act. The
difference between the amount received (less the amount of any
interest ordered by a court) and the amount of the deemed
dividend will be treated as proceeds of disposition of the
Common Shares for the purpose of computing any capital gain or
capital loss arising on the disposition of such Common Shares.
The tax treatment of any dividend deemed to have been received
in such circumstances generally would be the same as the tax
treatment of dividends deemed to have been received on the
redemption of Redeemable Shares, as described above.
As an alternative to the amalgamation, capital reorganization
and share consolidation discussed herein, the Offeror may
propose a Subsequent Acquisition Transaction to be effected by
an arrangement or other transaction, the tax consequences of
which may materially differ from those arising on the sale of
Common Shares under the Offer or an amalgamation, a capital
reorganization or a share consolidation and will depend on the
particular form and circumstances of such alternative
transaction. No view is expressed herein as to the tax
consequences of any such transaction to a Resident Shareholder.
Shareholders
Not Resident in Canada
This portion of the summary is generally applicable to a
Shareholder who, at all relevant times, for the purposes of the
Tax Act, is not, and is not deemed to be, resident in Canada and
does not use or hold, and is not deemed to use or hold, Common
Shares in connection with carrying on a business in Canada (a
Non-Resident Shareholder). Special rules, which are
not discussed in this summary, may apply to a non-resident that
is an insurer carrying on business in Canada and elsewhere, and
any such insurers should consult their own tax advisors.
42
Sale
Pursuant to the Offer
A Non-Resident Shareholder who disposes of Common Shares to the
Offeror pursuant to the Offer will not be subject to income tax
under the Tax Act on any capital gain realized on the
disposition of such Common Shares, unless the Common Shares are
taxable Canadian property (as defined in the Tax
Act) to the Non-Resident Shareholder at the time of the
disposition of such Common Shares and any such gain is not
exempt from taxation under the Tax Act pursuant to the
provisions of an applicable income tax treaty or convention.
Generally, Common Shares will not constitute taxable Canadian
property to a Non-Resident Shareholder at a particular time
provided that (a) the Common Shares are listed on a
prescribed stock exchange (which currently includes the TSX and
the NYSE) at that time, and (b) the Non-Resident
Shareholder, persons with whom the Non-Resident Shareholder does
not deal at arms length, or the Non-Resident Shareholder
together with all such persons, have not owned 25% or more of
the shares of any class or series of Shell Canada at any time
during the 60 month period immediately preceding that time.
Common Shares may also be deemed to constitute taxable Canadian
property to a Non-Resident Shareholder in certain circumstances
specified in the Tax Act.
Even if the Common Shares are taxable Canadian property to a
Non-Resident Shareholder, any capital gain realized upon the
disposition of such Common Shares would not be subject to tax
under the Tax Act if such gain is exempt from tax pursuant to
the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty or convention.
Non-Resident Shareholders should consult their own tax advisors
with respect to the availability of any relief under the terms
of an applicable income tax convention in their particular
circumstances.
In the event that the Common Shares constitute taxable Canadian
property to a Non-Resident Shareholder and the capital gain
realized upon a disposition of such Common Shares to the Offeror
is not exempt from tax under the Tax Act by virtue of an
applicable income tax convention, the tax consequences as
described above under Resident in Canada Sale
Pursuant to the Offer will generally apply. Such
Non-Resident Shareholders should consult their own tax advisors
in this regard.
Compulsory
Acquisition
As described under Acquisition of Common Shares Not
Deposited Compulsory Acquisition, the Offeror may,
in certain circumstances, acquire Common Shares not deposited
under the Offer pursuant to a Compulsory Acquisition. Subject to
the discussion below under Delisting of Shares Following
Completion of the Offer, the Canadian federal income tax
consequences to a Non-Resident Shareholder who disposes of
Common Shares in such circumstances generally will be the same
as described above under Shareholders Not Resident in
Canada Sale Pursuant To The Offer.
Any interest awarded by a court and paid or credited to a
Non-Resident Shareholder exercising its right to dissent in
respect of a Compulsory Acquisition will be subject to Canadian
withholding tax at the rate of 25%, subject to any reduction in
the rate of withholding to which the Non-Resident Shareholder is
entitled pursuant to the provisions of an applicable income tax
treaty or convention.
Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction
As described under Acquisition of Common Shares Not
Deposited Subsequent Acquisition Transaction, if
the Offeror does not acquire all of the Common Shares pursuant
to the Offer or by means of a Compulsory Acquisition, the
Offeror may propose other means of acquiring the remaining
issued and outstanding Common Shares.
The tax treatment of a Subsequent Acquisition Transaction to a
Non-Resident Shareholder will depend upon the exact manner in
which the Subsequent Acquisition Transaction is carried out and
may be substantially the same as or materially different than
described above. A Non-Resident Shareholder may realize a
capital gain or a capital loss and/or be deemed to receive a
dividend pursuant to a Subsequent Acquisition Transaction, as
discussed above under Shareholders Resident in
Canada Subsequent Acquisition Transaction.
Whether or not a Non-Resident Shareholder would be subject to
tax under the Tax Act on any such capital gain would depend on
whether the Common Shares, Redeemable Shares, Special Shares or
fractional shares are taxable Canadian property to
the Non-Resident Shareholder for purposes of the Tax Act and
whether the Non-Resident Shareholder is entitled to relief under
an applicable income tax treaty or convention and other
circumstances at that time (see in particular the discussion
below under Delisting of Shares Following Completion of
the Offer). Dividends paid or credited or deemed to be
paid or credited to a Non-Resident Shareholder will be subject
to Canadian withholding tax at a rate of 25%, subject to any
reduction in the rate of
43
withholding to which the Non-Resident Shareholder is entitled
pursuant to the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty or
convention.
Any interest awarded by a court and paid or credited to a
Non-Resident Shareholder exercising its right to dissent in
respect of a Subsequent Acquisition Transaction will be subject
to Canadian withholding tax in the same manner as described
above under Shareholders Not Resident in Canada
Compulsory Acquisition. Non-Resident Shareholders should
consult their own tax advisors for advice with respect to the
potential income tax consequences to them of having their Common
Shares acquired pursuant to a Subsequent Acquisition Transaction.
Delisting
of Shares Following Completion of the Offer
As described above in Section 16 of this Circular,
Effect of the Offer on the Market for Common Shares; Stock
Exchange Listing; and Public Disclosure by Shell Canada,
the Common Shares may cease to be listed on the TSX following
the completion of the Offer and may not be listed on the TSX at
the time of their disposition by a Non-Resident Shareholder
pursuant to a Compulsory Acquisition or a Subsequent Acquisition
Transaction. Non-Resident Shareholders are cautioned that if the
Common Shares, Redeemable Shares, Special Shares or fractional
shares, as the case may be, are not listed or deemed to be
listed on a prescribed stock exchange (which includes the TSX)
for purposes of the Tax Act at the time they are disposed of:
(a) such shares will generally be taxable Canadian property
to the Non-Resident Shareholder; (b) the Non-Resident
Shareholder may be subject to tax under the Tax Act in respect
of any capital gain realized on such disposition, unless any
such gain is exempt from taxation under the Tax Act pursuant to
the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty or convention;
and (c) the notification and withholding provisions of
section 116 of the Tax Act will apply to the Non-Resident
Shareholder, in which case the Offeror will be entitled,
pursuant to the Tax Act, to deduct or withhold an amount from
any payment made to the Non-Resident Shareholder and to remit
such amount to the Receiver General of Canada on behalf of the
Non-Resident Shareholder.
Non-Resident Shareholders should consult their own tax
advisors for advice with respect to the potential income tax
consequences to them of not disposing of their Common Shares
pursuant to the Offer.
|
|
19.
|
Certain
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
|
U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT CIRCULAR 230 DISCLAIMER. ANY DISCUSSION
OF U.S. FEDERAL TAX ISSUES SET FORTH IN THIS CIRCULAR IS NOT
INTENDED OR WRITTEN TO BE RELIED ON, AND CANNOT BE RELIED ON, BY
ANY PERSON FOR THE PURPOSE OF AVOIDING ANY U.S. FEDERAL TAX
PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED ON SUCH PERSON UNDER THE U.S.
INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986, AS AMENDED. SUCH DISCUSSION IS
INCLUDED HEREIN IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROMOTION AND MARKETING
(WITHIN THE MEANING OF U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT CIRCULAR
230) OF THE TRANSACTIONS OR MATTERS ADDRESSED IN THIS
CIRCULAR.
The following summary describes the principal United States
federal income tax considerations generally applicable to U.S.
Holders (as defined below) (and regarding Information and
Reporting Backup Withholding, non-U.S. Holders as well) with
respect to the disposition of Common Shares pursuant to the
Offer or pursuant to certain transactions described in
Section 21 of this Circular, Acquisition of Common
Shares Not Deposited. This summary is based upon the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code), as
amended, its legislative history, proposed, temporary and final
United States Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder,
judicial decisions and administrative rulings and practice, all
as in effect as of the date hereof, all of which are subject to
change (possibly with retroactive effect). This discussion does
not address aspects of United States federal taxation other than
income taxation, nor does it address all aspects of United
States federal income taxation, including aspects of United
States federal income taxation that may be applicable to
particular Shareholders, such as Shareholders who are dealers in
securities, insurance companies, tax exempt organizations,
financial institutions, regulated investment companies, entities
treated as partnerships for United States federal income tax
purposes, those who hold their Common Shares as part of a
straddle, hedge, conversion, synthetic security or constructive
sale transaction for United States federal income tax purposes,
foreign persons, those who have a functional currency other than
the United States dollar or those who acquired their Common
Shares in a compensation transaction. This summary is limited to
persons that hold their Securities as capital assets
within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code. This
discussion also does not address the United States federal
income tax consequences to holders of options to purchase Common
Shares or to Shareholders who own directly, indirectly and/or by
attribution 10% or more of the Common Shares. In addition, this
discussion does not address any state, local or foreign tax
consequences.
44
U.S. Holders of Common Shares are urged to consult their tax
advisors with respect to the United States federal, state, local
and foreign tax consequences of the Offer or other transactions
described in Section 21 of the Circular, Acquisition
of Common Shares Not Deposited.
As used herein, the term U.S. Holder means a
beneficial owner of Common Shares that, for United States
federal income tax purposes, is (i) a citizen or resident
of the United States, (ii) a corporation (or other entity
treated as a corporation for United States federal income tax
purposes) created or organized under the Laws of the United
States or a political subdivision thereof, (iii) an estate
the income of which is subject to federal income taxation
regardless of source, or (iv) a trust the administration of
which is subject to the primary supervision of a United States
court if one or more United States persons have the authority to
control all substantial decisions of such trust.
If a partnership (including any entity treated as a partnership
for United States federal income tax purposes) is the beneficial
owner of Common Shares, the tax treatment of a partner in such
partnership will depend upon the status of the partner and the
activities of the partnership. Partners in such a partnership
should consult their tax advisors as to the particular tax
considerations applicable to them.
Sales
Pursuant to the Offer
If a U.S. Holder accepts and participates in the Offer, the U.S.
Holder will recognize gain or loss in an amount equal to the
difference, if any, between (i) the cash proceeds of the
Offer and (ii) the adjusted tax basis of the U.S. Holder in
the Common Shares exchanged.
The gain or loss described in the paragraph above generally will
be U.S. source capital gain or loss, and will be long term
capital gain or loss if the Common Shares have been held for
more than one year, subject to the discussion below regarding
Passive Foreign Investment Companies. Preferential tax rates
apply to long term capital gains of a U.S. Holder that is an
individual, estate, or trust. There are currently no
preferential tax rates for long term capital gains of a U.S.
Holder that is a corporation. Deductions for capital losses are
subject to complex limitations.
The amount of any Canadian dollars received by a U.S. Holder
generally will be translated into U.S. dollars for purposes of
calculating the gain or loss described above using the spot
exchange rate applicable on the date the Offer is consummated. A
subsequent disposition of any foreign currency received will
generally give rise to ordinary income or loss. A U.S. Holder
should consult its own tax advisor regarding the United States
federal income tax consequences of acquiring, holding and
disposing of foreign currency.
Compulsory
Acquisition of Common Shares
The United States federal income tax consequences to a U.S.
Holder of a disposition of Common Shares pursuant to a
Compulsory Acquisition generally will be as described under
Sale Pursuant to the Offer above.
Subject to the discussion below under the heading
Considerations Relating to the Passive Foreign Investment
Company Rules, and although there is no authority directly
on point, a U.S. Holder who dissents in a Compulsory Acquisition
and elects to receive the fair value for the holders
Common Shares probably will recognize a gain or loss at the time
of the Compulsory Acquisition (even if the fair market value of
the Common Shares has not yet been judicially determined at such
time), in an amount equal to the difference between the fair
market value of the Common Shares and the adjusted tax basis of
such Common Shares. In such event, gain or loss also would be
recognized by the U.S. Holder at the time the actual fair value
payment is determined, to the extent that such payment exceeds
or is less than the amount previously recognized. In addition, a
portion of the actual payment received may instead be
characterized as interest income, in which case the United
States dollar equivalent to the Canadian dollar amount of such
portion generally should be included in ordinary income in
accordance with the U.S. Holders method of accounting.
U.S. Holders disposing of their Common Shares pursuant to a
Compulsory Acquisition should consult their tax advisors with
respect to any United States federal, state or local tax
consequences to them.
Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction
If the Offeror is unable to effect a Compulsory Acquisition or
if the Offeror elects not to proceed with a Compulsory
Acquisition, then the Offeror may propose a Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction. The United States federal income tax
consequences resulting therefrom will depend upon the manner in
which the transaction is carried out and may be substantially
similar to or materially different from the consequences
described above.
45
A U.S. Holder who dissents in a Subsequent Acquisition
Transaction and elects to receive the fair value for the
holders Common Shares generally will be treated in the
same manner as described above under the heading
Compulsory Acquisition of Common Shares.
U.S. Holders that participate in a Subsequent Acquisition
Transaction or who dissent in a Subsequent Acquisition
Transaction should consult their tax advisors with respect to
any United States federal, state or local tax consequences to
them.
Amounts
Subject to Canadian Withholding Tax
A U.S. Holder who dissents in a Compulsory Acquisition or a
Subsequent Acquisition Transaction and who receives interest,
and, as a result, is subject to Canadian withholding tax (or who
is otherwise subject to Canadian withholding tax), as described
in Section 18 of this Circular, Canadian Federal
Income Tax Consequences Holders Not Resident in
Canada, may be eligible, subject to a number of complex
limitations, to claim a foreign tax credit or a deduction in
respect of any Canadian taxes withheld. If a U.S. Holder elects
to claim a foreign tax credit, rather than a deduction, for a
particular taxable year, such election will apply to all foreign
taxes paid by the holder in a particular year. In addition,
subject to limitations, a U.S. Holder eligible for the
benefits of the U.S. Canadian Tax Treaty will not be
subject to Canadian tax on the disposition of its Shares,
including pursuant to a Compulsory Acquisition or Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction.
Considerations
Relating to the Passive Foreign Investment Company
Rules
A non-United States corporation will be a Passive Foreign
Investment Company (PFIC) for any taxable year if
either (i) 75% or more of its gross income in the taxable
year is passive income, or (ii) 50% or more of the average
value of its assets in the taxable year produces, or is held for
the production of, passive income. The IRS takes the position
that interest on working capital or any other cash is passive
income. If Shell Canada had been a PFIC for any taxable year in
which Common Shares were held by U.S. Holders, such U.S. Holders
could be subject to unfavorable tax consequences, including
significantly more tax on the disposition of their Common Shares
pursuant to the Offer, a Compulsory Acquisition or a Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction. These tax consequences could be
mitigated if the U.S. Holder makes, or has made, an effective
qualified electing fund (QEF) election or election
to
mark-to-market
the holders Common Shares. If neither election is or has
been made, under the PFIC provisions, in any year in which the
U.S. Holder disposes of a Common Share at a gain, special rules
apply to the taxation of the gain. The gain must be allocated
ratably to each day the U.S. Holder has held the Common Share.
Amounts allocated to each year, beginning with the first year in
such holding period during which the foreign company was a PFIC
(a Prior PFIC Year), are taxable as ordinary income
in their entirety (not eligible for the reduced rate for
dividends) and not as capital gain, and amounts allocable to
Prior PFIC Years may not be offset by any deductions or losses.
Amounts allocated to each such Prior PFIC Year are taxable at
the highest rate in effect for that year and are subject to an
interest charge at the rates applicable to deficiencies for
income tax for those periods.
Information
Reporting and Backup Withholding
Cash payments made pursuant to the Offer, a Compulsory
Acquisition or a Subsequent Acquisition Transaction will be
reported to the Internal Revenue Service to the extent required
by the Code and applicable Treasury regulations. These amounts
ordinarily will not be subject to withholding of United States
federal income tax. However, backup withholding of the tax at
applicable rates will apply to all cash payments to which a U.S.
Holder is entitled pursuant to the Offer, a Compulsory
Acquisition or a Subsequent Acquisition Transaction if such
holder (i) fails to supply the Depositary with the
shareholders taxpayer identification number (Social
Security number, in the case of individuals, or employer
identification number, in the case of other Shareholders),
certify that such number is correct, and otherwise comply with
the backup withholding rules, (ii) has received notice from
the Internal Revenue Service of a failure to report all interest
and dividends required to be shown on the shareholders
United States federal income tax returns, or (iii) is
subject to backup withholding in certain other cases.
Accordingly, each U.S. Holder will be asked to complete and sign
a Substitute
Form W-9
in order to provide the information and certification necessary
to avoid backup withholding or to otherwise establish an
exemption from backup withholding tax, unless an exemption
applies and is established in a manner satisfactory to the
Depositary.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts
withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a
refund or a credit against your United States federal income tax
liability provided the required information is timely furnished
to the Internal Revenue Service.
46
|
|
20.
|
Material
Changes and Other Information
|
Except as disclosed elsewhere in this Circular, the Offeror has
no information which indicates any material change in the
affairs of Shell Canada since the date of the last published
unaudited financial statements of Shell Canada and the Offeror
has no knowledge of any other matter that has not previously
been generally disclosed but which would reasonably be expected
to affect the decision of the Shareholders to accept or reject
the Offer.
|
|
21.
|
Acquisition
of Common Shares Not Deposited
|
It is the Offerors current intention that if it takes up
and pays for Common Shares deposited under the Offer, it will
enter into one or more transactions to enable the Offeror or an
affiliate of the Offeror to acquire all Common Shares not
acquired pursuant to the Offer. There is no assurance that any
such transaction will be completed.
Compulsory
Acquisition
If, within 120 calendar days after the date of the Offer, the
Offer is accepted by Shareholders holding not less than 90% of
the Common Shares (calculated on a fully-diluted basis), other
than any Common Shares held at the date of the Offer by or on
behalf of the Offeror or an affiliate or associate (as these
terms are defined in the CBCA) of the Offeror, and the Offeror
acquires such Deposited Securities, then the Offeror intends to
acquire the Common Shares not deposited under the Offer on the
same terms as the Common Shares acquired under the Offer
pursuant to either the provisions of section 206 of the CBCA (a
Compulsory Acquisition) or pursuant to a Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction.
To exercise its statutory right of Compulsory Acquisition, the
Offeror must give notice (the Offerors Notice)
to each Shareholder who did not accept the Offer (and each
Person who subsequently acquires any such Common Shares) (in
each case, a Dissenting Offeree) and the Director
under the CBCA of such proposed acquisition on or before the
earlier of 60 calendar days following the termination of the
Offer and 180 calendar days following the date of the Offer.
Within 20 calendar days after having given the Offerors
Notice, the Offeror must pay or transfer to Shell Canada the
consideration it would have had to pay or transfer to the
Dissenting Offerees if they had elected to accept the Offer, to
be held in trust for the Dissenting Offerees. Within 20 calendar
days after receipt of the Offerors Notice, each Dissenting
Offeree must send the certificates evidencing the Shares held by
such Dissenting Offeree to Shell Canada and must elect either to
transfer such Common Shares to the Offeror on the terms on which
the Offeror acquired Common Shares under the Offer or to demand
payment of the fair value of the Common Shares by so notifying
the Offeror. If the Dissenting Offeree fails to notify the
Offeror within the applicable time period, the Dissenting
Offeree will be deemed to have elected to transfer its Shares to
the Offeror on the same terms on which the Offeror acquired the
Common Shares under the Offer. If a Dissenting Offeree has
elected to demand payment of the fair value of its Common
Shares, the Offeror may apply to a court having jurisdiction to
hear the application to fix the fair value of the Common Shares
of that Dissenting Offeree. If the Offeror fails to apply to
such court within 20 calendar days after it made the payment or
transferred the consideration to Shell Canada, the Dissenting
Offeree may then apply to the court within a further period of
20 calendar days to have the court fix the fair value. If no
such application is made by the Dissenting Offeree or the
Offeror within such periods, the Dissenting Offeree will be
deemed to have elected to transfer its Common Shares to the
Offeror on the same terms on which the Offeror acquired Common
Shares from the Shareholders who accepted the Offer.
Any judicial determination of the fair value of the Common
Shares could be more or less than the amount of the
consideration per Common Share paid pursuant to the Offer.
The foregoing is only a summary of the statutory right of
Compulsory Acquisition that may become available to the Offeror.
The summary is not intended to be complete nor is it a
substitute for the more detailed information contained in the
provisions of section 206 of the CBCA. Shareholders should refer
to section 206 of the CBCA for the full text of the relevant
statutory provisions, and those who wish to be better informed
about these provisions should consult their legal advisors. The
provisions of section 206 of the CBCA are complex and require
strict adherence to notice and timing provisions, failing which
such rights may be lost or altered.
Compelled
Acquisition
Under section 206.1 of the CBCA, if a Shareholder who did not
accept the Offer does not receive the Offerors Notice
pursuant to section 206 of the CBCA, the Shareholder may, within
90 calendar days after the date of the termination of the Offer,
or if the Shareholder did not receive the Offer, within 90
calendar days of the later of the date of termination of the
Offer and the date on which the Shareholder learns of the Offer,
require the Offeror to acquire the Shareholders Common
Shares on the terms of the Offer (a Compelled
Acquisition).
47
The foregoing is only a summary of the statutory right of
Compelled Acquisition that may become available to a
Shareholder. The summary is not intended to be complete nor is
it a substitute for the more detailed information contained in
the provisions of section 206.1 of the CBCA. Shareholders should
refer to section 206.1 of the CBCA for the full text of the
relevant statutory provisions, and those who wish to be better
informed about these provisions should consult their legal
advisors. The provisions of section 206.1 of the CBCA are
complex and require strict adherence to notice and timing
provisions, failing which such rights may be lost or altered.
Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction
If (a) the Minimum Condition is satisfied, and
(b) either the right of Compulsory Acquisition described
above is not available or the Offeror elects not to pursue a
Compulsory Acquisition, the Offeror currently intends to cause a
special meeting of shareholders to be called to consider an
amalgamation, statutory arrangement, capital reorganization or
other transaction involving Shell Canada and the Offeror or an
affiliate of the Offeror for the purpose of enabling the Offeror
or an affiliate of the Offeror to acquire all Common Shares not
acquired pursuant to the Offer (a Subsequent Acquisition
Transaction). The timing and details of any such
transaction will depend on a number of factors, including the
number of Common Shares acquired pursuant to the Offer. If the
Minimum Condition is satisfied and the Offeror takes up and pays
for the Common Shares deposited under the Offer, the Offeror
should own sufficient Common Shares to effect such a Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction. The Offeror currently intends that the
consideration offered under any Subsequent Acquisition
Transaction would be the same cash price or securities
immediately redeemable for the same cash price as the price
offered under the Offer.
Each type of Subsequent Acquisition Transaction described above
would be a business combination under
Rule 61-501
and a going private transaction under
Regulation Q-27.
In certain circumstances, the provisions of
Rule 61-501
and
Regulation Q-27
may also deem certain types of Subsequent Acquisition
Transactions to be related party transactions.
However, if the Subsequent Acquisition Transaction is a business
combination carried out in accordance with
Rule 61-501
or a going private transaction carried out in accordance with
Regulation Q-27,
the related party transaction provisions of
Rule 61-501
and
Regulation Q-27
will not apply to such transaction. The Offeror intends to carry
out any such Subsequent Acquisition Transaction in accordance
with
Rule 61-501
and
Regulation Q-27,
or any successor provisions, or exemptions therefrom, such that
the related party transaction provisions of
Rule 61-501
and
Regulation Q-27
will not apply to the business combination or
going private transaction.
Rule 61-501
and
Regulation Q-27
provide that, unless exempted, a corporation proposing to carry
out a business combination or a going private
transaction is required to prepare a valuation of the
affected securities (in this case, the Common Shares), and
subject to certain exceptions, any non-cash consideration being
offered therefor, and provide to the holders of the affected
securities a summary of such valuation or the entire valuation.
In connection therewith, the Offeror intends to rely on an
available exemption or to seek waivers pursuant to
Rule 61-501
and
Regulation Q-27
from the OSC and the AMF, respectively, exempting Shell Canada
or the Offeror or their affiliates, as appropriate, from the
requirement to prepare a valuation in connection with any
Subsequent Acquisition Transaction. An exemption is available
under
Rule 61-501
for certain business combinations, and under
Regulation Q-27
for certain going private transactions, completed
within 120 calendar days after the expiry of a formal take-over
bid where the consideration under such transaction is at least
equal in value and is in the same form as the consideration that
was received in the take-over bid, provided certain disclosure
is given in the take-over bid disclosure documents. The Offeror
has provided such disclosure and expects that these exemptions
will be available.
Depending on the nature of the Subsequent Acquisition
Transaction, the Offeror expects that the provisions of the CBCA
will require the approval of at least
662/3%
of the votes cast by holders of the outstanding Common Shares at
a meeting duly called and held for the purpose of approving a
Subsequent Acquisition Transaction.
Rule 61-501
and
Regulation Q-27
would in effect also require that, in addition to any other
required securityholder approval, in order to complete a
business combination or a going private transaction, the
approval of a majority of the votes cast by minority
holders of the affected securities must be obtained unless an
exemption is available or discretionary relief is granted by the
OSC and the AMF. In relation to any Subsequent Acquisition
Transaction, the minority holders will be, subject
to any available exemption or discretionary relief granted by
the OSC and the AMF as required, all holders of Common Shares
other than the Offeror, any other interested party
of Shell Canada (within the meaning of
Rule 61-501
and AMF
Regulation Q-27),
any related party of the Offeror or any other
interested party of Shell Canada (within the meaning
of
Rule 61-501
and
Regulation Q-27),
including any director or senior officer of the Offeror,
affiliate or insider of the Offeror or any of their directors or
senior officers or any Person acting jointly or in concert with
any of the foregoing.
48
However,
Rule 61-501
and
Regulation Q-27
also provide that the Offeror may treat Common Shares acquired
pursuant to the Offer as minority shares and vote
them, or consider them voted, in favour of a Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction that is a business
combination or going private transaction
provided that: (a) the business combination or
going private transaction is completed not later
than 120 days after the Expiry Time; (b) the
consideration for each Share in the Subsequent Acquisition
Transaction is at least equal in value to and in the same form
as the consideration paid pursuant to the Offer; and
(c) the Shareholder who deposited such Shares to the Offer
was not a direct or indirect party to any connected
transaction to the Offer (for the purpose of
Rule 61-501)
or entitled to receive, directly or indirectly, in connection
with the Offer, a collateral benefit (for purposes
of
Rule 61-501).
The Offeror currently intends that the consideration offered
under any Subsequent Acquisition Transaction proposed by it
would be of the same value and in the same form as the
consideration paid to Shareholders under the Offer, and
accordingly the Offeror intends to cause Common Shares acquired
pursuant to the Offer to be voted in favour of such transaction
and to be counted as part of any minority approval required in
connection with any such transaction.
In addition, under
Rule 61-501
and
Regulation Q-27,
if, following the Offer, the Offeror and its affiliates are the
registered holders of 90% or more of the Common Shares at the
time the Subsequent Acquisition Transaction is initiated, the
requirement for minority approval would not apply to the
transaction if a statutory right to dissent and seek fair value
or a substantially equivalent enforceable right is made
available to the minority shareholders.
If the Offeror does not effect a Compulsory Acquisition, or
proposes a Subsequent Acquisition Transaction but cannot
promptly obtain any required approval or exemption, or cannot
otherwise complete a Subsequent Acquisition Transaction, the
Offeror will evaluate its other alternatives. Such alternatives
could include, to the extent permitted by applicable Laws,
purchasing additional Common Shares in the open market, in
privately negotiated transactions, in another take-over bid or
exchange offer or otherwise, or from Shell Canada, or taking no
further action to acquire additional Common Shares. Any
additional purchases of Common Shares could be at a price
greater than, equal to or less than the price to be paid for
Common Shares under the Offer and could be for cash and/or
securities or other consideration. Alternatively, the Offeror
may sell or otherwise dispose of any or all Common Shares
acquired pursuant to the Offer or otherwise. Such transactions
may be effected on terms and at prices then determined by the
Offeror, which may vary from the terms and the price paid for
Common Shares under the Offer.
Any Subsequent Acquisition Transaction may also result in
Shareholders having the right to dissent and demand payment of
the fair value of their Common Shares. If the statutory
procedures are complied with, this right could lead to a
judicial determination of the fair value required to be paid to
such dissenting Shareholders for their Common Shares. The fair
value of Common Shares so determined could be more or less than
the amount paid per Common Share pursuant to the Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction or the Offer.
The tax consequences to a Shareholder of a Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction may differ from the tax consequences to
such Shareholder of accepting the Offer. See Section 18 of
this Circular, Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax
Considerations and Section 19 of this Circular,
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.
Shareholders should consult their tax advisors for advice with
respect to the tax consequences of a Subsequent Acquisition
Transaction having regard to their own particular circumstances.
Further, shareholders should consult their legal advisors for a
determination of their legal rights with respect to a Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction if and when proposed.
Judicial
Developments
Prior to the pronouncement of
Rule 61-501
(or its predecessor, OSC Policy 9.1) and
Regulation Q-27,
Canadian courts had, in a few instances, granted preliminary
injunctions to prohibit transactions which constituted going
private transactions or business combinations within the meaning
of the Rules. The Offeror has been advised that subsequent
notices and judicial decisions indicate a willingness to permit
these transactions to proceed subject to compliance with
requirements intended to ensure procedural and substantive
fairness to the minority shareholders. Recent
amendments to the CBCA expressly permit going-private
transactions, subject to compliance with procedural and
substantive fairness requirements including those set forth in
the Rules.
Shareholders should consult their legal advisors for a
determination of their legal rights with respect to any
transaction which may constitute a business combination or going
private transaction.
49
|
|
22.
|
Dealer
Managers and Depositary
|
Morgan Stanley Canada Limited and Scotia Capital Inc. are acting
as dealer managers in connection with the Offer. The Offeror
will reimburse the Dealer Managers for their reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses, including reasonable attorneys fees, and has
also agreed to indemnify the Dealer Managers against certain
liabilities and expenses in connection with the Offer, including
certain liabilities under the provincial securities Laws of
Canada.
Morgan Stanley Canada Limited and Scotia Capital Inc. have
undertaken to form a soliciting dealer group comprising members
of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada and
participating organizations of the TSX to solicit acceptances of
the Offer. Each member of the Soliciting Dealer Group, including
Morgan Stanley Canada Limited and Scotia Capital Inc., is
referred to herein as a Soliciting Dealer. The
Offeror has agreed to pay to the Soliciting Dealer whose name
appears in the appropriate space on the Letter of Transmittal
accompanying a valid deposit of Common Shares a fee of $0.20 for
each Common Share deposited and acquired by the Offeror under
the Offer. The aggregate amount payable to a Soliciting Dealer
with respect to any single depositing holder of Common Shares
will be a minimum of $125 and a maximum of $1,500, provided that
the minimum fee shall only be payable in respect of deposits of
400 Common Shares or more. Where Common Shares deposited
and registered in a single name are beneficially owned by more
than one Person, the minimum or the maximum fee amounts will be
applied separately in respect of each such beneficial owner if a
Soliciting Dealer provides proof of the beneficial ownership of
Common Shares in respect of which a fee is claimed. The Offeror
will not be required to pay a fee to more than one Soliciting
Dealer in respect of any one beneficial owner of Common Shares.
The Offeror may require the Soliciting Dealers to furnish
evidence of beneficial ownership satisfactory to the Offeror at
the time of deposit.
The Offeror has also engaged CIBC Mellon Trust Company to
act as depositary for the receipt of certificates in respect of
Common Shares and related Letters of Transmittal. In addition,
the Depositary will receive Notices of Guaranteed Delivery
deposited under the Offer at its office in Toronto, Ontario,
Canada. The Depositary will also be responsible for giving
notices, if required, and for making payment to Shareholders for
Common Shares purchased by the Offeror pursuant to the Offer.
The Depositary will also facilitate book-entry transfers of
Common Shares. The Depositary will receive reasonable and
customary compensation from the Offeror for its services in
connection with the Offer, will be reimbursed for certain
out-of-pocket
expenses and will be indemnified against certain liabilities and
expenses in connection therewith, including, without limitation,
applicable securities Law compliance matters.
No fee or commission will be payable by any Shareholder who
transmits such Shareholders Common Shares directly to the
Depositary or who makes use of the facilities of a Soliciting
Dealer to accept the Offer. However, a broker or nominee through
whom a Shareholder owns Common Shares may charge a fee to
deposit Common Shares on behalf of the Shareholder. Shareholders
should consult their brokers or nominees to determine whether
any charges will apply. Except as set forth above, the Offeror
will not pay any fees or commissions to any stockbroker, dealer
or other Person for soliciting tenders of Common Shares pursuant
to the Offer. Stockbrokers, dealers, commercial banks and trust
companies and other nominees will, upon request, be reimbursed
by the Offeror for customary clerical, mailing and handling
expenses incurred by them in forwarding materials to their
clients.
The Offeror has retained Kingsdale Shareholder Services Inc. to
act as Information Agent. The Information Agent may contact
Shareholders by mail, telephone, facsimile and personal
interviews and may request brokers, dealers and other nominees
to forward materials relating to the Offer to beneficial owners
of Common Shares. The Offeror will pay the Information Agent
reasonable and customary compensation for its services in
connection with the Offer, plus reimbursement for
out-of-pocket
expenses, and will indemnify the Information Agent against
certain liabilities and expenses in connection with the Offer.
Questions and requests for assistance concerning the Offer
should be made directly to the Dealer Managers or the
Information Agent.
|
|
24.
|
Benefits
from the Offer
|
Other than as disclosed elsewhere in this Circular, no Person
named under Section 9 of this Circular, Beneficial
Ownership of and Trading in Securities, will receive any
direct or indirect benefit from accepting or refusing to accept
the Offer, other than the consideration available to any
Shareholder who deposits Common Shares to the Offer.
50
The following is an estimate of fees and expenses (in thousands
of dollars) to be incurred in connection with the Offer by Shell
Canada, RDS and the Offeror:
|
|
|
|
|
RDS Legal and Financial Advisory
Expenses
|
|
U.S.$
|
17,526
|
|
Fees relating to CIBC World
Markets Valuation and Fairness Opinion
|
|
U.S.$
|
4,887
|
|
Special Committee Legal and
Financial Advisory Expenses
|
|
U.S.$
|
1,686
|
|
Filing fees
|
|
U.S.$
|
302
|
|
Accounting
|
|
U.S.$
|
24
|
|
Printing
|
|
U.S.$
|
107
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
U.S.$
|
361
|
|
Total
|
|
U.S.$
|
24,892
|
|
Shell Canada will be responsible for paying its legal, filing
and printing costs incurred in connection with the Offer.
Legal matters on behalf of the Offeror and RDS will be passed
upon by, and the opinion contained under Certain Canadian
Federal Income Tax Considerations in Section 18 of
this Circular has been provided by, Stikeman Elliott LLP,
Canadian counsel to the Offeror and RDS. Legal matters on behalf
of the Offeror and RDS will be passed upon by, and the opinion
contained under Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax
Considerations in Section 19 of this Circular has
been provided by, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, U.S.
counsel to the Offeror and RDS.
|
|
27.
|
Requirements
of an Insider Bid
|
The Offer is an insider bid within the meaning of
certain Canadian provincial securities legislation and
Rule 61-501
and
Regulation Q-27
by virtue of the Offeror, together with its affiliates, owning
more than 10% of the Common Shares. The applicable securities
legislation and regulatory policies require that a formal
valuation of the securities that are the subject of the bid be
prepared by an independent valuator, filed with the applicable
securities regulators and summarized in the
insider-offerors take-over bid circular. See
Section 12 of this Circular, CIBC World Markets
Valuation and CIBC World Markets Fairness Opinion.
Applicable securities legislation and regulatory policies also
require that every prior valuation (as defined in
Rule 61-501
and
Regulation Q-27)
of Shell Canada, its material assets or its securities made in
the 24 months preceding the date of the Offer, that is
known to the Offeror or its directors and senior officers, be
disclosed in this Circular. No such prior valuations made in the
24 months preceding the date of the Offer are known, after
reasonable enquiry, to the Offeror or its directors and officers.
|
|
28.
|
Offerees
Statutory Rights
|
Securities legislation in certain of the provinces and
territories of Canada provides Shareholders with, in addition to
any other rights they may have at Law, rights of rescission or
damages, or both, if there is a misrepresentation in a circular
or notice that is required to be delivered to such Shareholders.
However, such rights must be exercised within prescribed time
limits. Shareholders should refer to the applicable provisions
of the securities legislation of their province or territory for
the particulars of those rights or consult with a lawyer.
The contents of the Offer and this Circular have been approved
and the sending thereof to the Shareholders has been authorized
by the boards of directors of the Offeror and RDS, respectively.
|
|
30.
|
Financial
Information
|
The following documents of Shell Canada, filed with the SEC, are
specifically incorporated by reference into and form an integral
part of this Circular:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Audited consolidated financial statements of Shell Canada for
the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, and the
related U.S. GAAP reconciliation, incorporated by reference to
pages 62 through 82 of Exhibit 99.B and pages 33 through 35
of Exhibit 99.A, respectively, of Shell Canadas
Annual Report on
Form 40-F
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (File
No. 000-12049).
|
51
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Unaudited consolidated financial statements of Shell Canada for
the quarter and year ended December 31, 2006, incorporated
by reference to pages 24 through 38 of Exhibit 99.1 of
Shell Canadas Report on
Form 6-K
for the month of January 2007, furnished to the SEC on
January 29, 2007 (File
No. 000-12049).
|
|
|
31.
|
Ratio of
Earnings to Fixed Charges and Net Book Value
|
The following table sets forth the consolidated unaudited ratio
of earnings to fixed charges of Shell Canada, (i) on a
Canadian GAAP basis for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005, 2004 and 2003 and (ii) on a U.S. GAAP basis for the
years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges(a)
(Canadian GAAP)
|
|
|
34.03
|
|
|
|
70.08
|
|
|
|
33.54
|
|
|
|
14.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges(a)
(U.S. GAAP)
|
|
|
69.81
|
|
|
|
33.45
|
|
|
|
14.22
|
|
|
|
(a) |
For the purposes of this table, earnings consists of
pre-tax income from continuing operations before adjustment for
minority interest plus fixed charges. Fixed charges
consists of expensed and capitalized interest plus interest
within rental expenses plus preference security dividend
amortization of capitalized interest.
|
The book value per Common Share as of December 31, 2006 was
$11.60 under Canadian GAAP, which is calculated based on equity
attributable to Shell Canada of $9,580 million and
825,662,514 Common Shares outstanding as of such date. For
further information, see the audited and unaudited consolidated
financial statements of Shell Canada which are incorporated
herein by reference. See Section 30 of this Circular,
Financial Information.
Except as disclosed above, in connection with the Offer
contemplated hereby, RDS, the Offeror and Shell Canada have not,
as of the date hereof, employed, retained or compensated other
persons to make solicitations or recommendations to
Shareholders. The boards of directors of RDS and the Offeror
were assisted by a working group of senior finance, accounting
and legal personnel from the Shell Group. While no specific use
of corporate assets of Shell Canada is contemplated by RDS, the
Offeror or Shell Canada in connection with the Offer, it is
possible that some such use, none of which is expected to be
material, may occur.
|
|
33.
|
Additional
Information
|
Additional information concerning the Offer may be found in the
Rule 13E-3
Transaction Statement and exhibits in the
Schedule 13E-3,
including amendments thereto, as and when filed with the SEC
under the U.S. Exchange Act by RDS, the Offeror and Shell Canada
and on www.shell.com. Neither the website, nor its content, is
incorporated by reference herein.
Copies of the CIBC World Markets Valuation and the CIBC World
Markets Fairness Opinion (i) will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal executive offices of
Shell Canada during its regular business hours by any interested
Shareholder or representative who has been so designated in
writing, (ii) may be obtained by mail through written
request to Shell Canada and (iii) will also be filed as an
exhibit to the
Schedule 13E-3
and made available on the above website.
Additional information on RDS and the Shell Group can be found
in the Annual Report on
Form 20-F
of RDS with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31,
2005 (the Royal Dutch Shell 20-F). Additional
information on Shell Canada can be found in the Annual Report on
Form 40-F
of Shell Canada with respect to the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005 (the Shell Canada 40-F).
RDS and Shell Canada are subject to the informational reporting
requirements of the U.S. Exchange Act, and accordingly each file
or furnish reports and other information with the SEC. Reports
and other information filed by RDS and Shell Canada with the
SEC, including in the Royal Dutch Shell 20-F and Shell Canada
40-F, can be inspected and copied at the public reference
facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549, U.S.A. Copies of those materials can be
obtained at prescribed rates from the SECs Public
Reference Section at 100 F Street,
52
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, U.S.A. Further information on the
operation of the SECs Public Reference Room in Washington,
D.C. can be obtained by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC also maintains an internet website that contains reports
and other information about issuers, such as RDS and Shell
Canada, who file electronically with the SEC. The address of
that website is www.sec.gov.
None of RDS, the Offeror, Shell Canada or any of their
respective affiliates has authorized any Person to provide any
information or to make any representation in connection with
this Offer and Circular other than the information contained or
referenced in this Offer and Circular. If any Person provides
any of this information or makes any representation of this
kind, that information or representation must not be relied upon
as having been authorized by RDS, the Offeror, Shell Canada or
such affiliate.
No other provision has been made by RDS, the Offeror or Shell
Canada in connection with the Offer to grant Shareholders access
to the corporate files of, or to obtain counsel or appraisal
services at the expense of, any of RDS, the Offeror or Shell
Canada.
53
CONSENT
OF STIKEMAN ELLIOTT LLP
|
|
TO: |
The Directors of Shell Investments Limited and Royal Dutch
Shell plc
|
We hereby consent to the reference to our opinion contained
under Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax
Considerations in the Circular accompanying the Offer
dated February 8, 2007 made by the Offeror to the holders
of Common Shares of Shell Canada other than the Offeror and its
affiliates.
(Signed) Stikeman Elliott
LLP
Toronto, Ontario
February 8, 2007
54
CONSENT
OF CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP
|
|
TO: |
The Directors of Shell Investments Limited and Royal Dutch
Shell plc
|
We hereby consent to the reference to our opinion contained
under Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
in the Circular accompanying the Offer dated February 8,
2007 made by the Offeror to the holders of Common Shares of
Shell Canada other than the Offeror and its affiliates.
(Signed) Cravath,
Swaine & Moore LLP
London, UK
February 8, 2007
55
CONSENT
OF CIBC WORLD MARKETS INC.
|
|
TO: |
The Directors of Shell Investments Limited and Royal Dutch
Shell plc
|
We refer to the formal valuation dated January 22, 2007,
which we prepared for the Special Committee of the Board of
Directors of Shell Canada Limited in connection with the Offer
made by the Offeror to the holders of Common Shares of Shell
Canada Limited other than the Offeror and its affiliates. We
consent to the filing of the formal valuation with the
applicable Canadian securities regulatory authorities and the
inclusion of the formal valuation and a summary of the formal
valuation in this Circular. In providing such consent, we do not
intend that any person other than the Special Committee and the
Board of Directors of Shell Canada Limited rely upon such formal
valuation.
(Signed) CIBC World
Markets Inc.
Calgary, Alberta
February 8, 2007
56
APPROVAL
AND CERTIFICATE OF SHELL INVESTMENTS LIMITED
DATED: February 8, 2007
The contents of the Offer and the Circular have been approved
and the sending, communication or delivery thereof to the
Shareholders have been authorized, by the board of directors of
Shell Investments Limited.
The foregoing contains no untrue statement of a material fact
and does not omit to state a material fact that is required to
be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not
misleading in the light of the circumstances in which it is
made. In addition, the foregoing does not contain any
misrepresentation likely to affect the value or the market price
of the Common Shares subject to the Offer.
|
|
|
(Signed)
Arnold MacBurnie
Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
(Signed)
Mieke Findlay
Chief Financial
Officer
|
On behalf of the Board of Directors of Shell Investments
Limited
|
|
|
(Signed)
Daniel Hall
Director
|
|
(Signed)
Derric Ostapyk
Director
|
57
APPROVAL
AND CERTIFICATE OF ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC
DATED: February 8, 2007
The contents of the Offer and the Circular have been approved
and the sending, communication or delivery thereof to the
Shareholders have been authorized, by the board of directors of
Royal Dutch Shell plc.
The foregoing contains no untrue statement of a material fact
and does not omit to state a material fact that is required to
be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not
misleading in the light of the circumstances in which it is
made. In addition, the foregoing does not contain any
misrepresentation likely to affect the value or the market price
of the Common Shares subject to the Offer.
|
|
|
(Signed)
Jeroen van der Veer
Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
(Signed)
Peter Voser
Chief Financial
Officer
|
On behalf of the Board of Directors of Royal Dutch Shell
plc
|
|
|
(Signed)
Malcolm Brinded
Director
|
|
(Signed)
Linda Zarda Cook
Director
|
58
SCHEDULE
A
CIBC
WORLD MARKETS INC. VALUATION
January 22,
2007
The Special Committee of the Board of Directors
Shell Canada Limited
400 4th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta T2P 0J4
|
|
Attention: |
Mr. Derek Burney, O.C.
Chairman of the Special Committee
|
Dear Sirs:
CIBC World Markets Inc. (CIBC World Markets)
understands that Shell Investments Limited (the
Offeror), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
Royal Dutch Shell plc (RDS), is proposing to make an
offer, by way of a take-over bid, to purchase all of the common
shares (the Common Shares) of Shell Canada Limited
(Shell Canada or the Company) not
already owned by the Offeror and its affiliates (the
Offer).
CIBC World Markets also understands that the Offeror and its
affiliates own approximately 78% of the outstanding Common
Shares and that the Offer would constitute an insider
bid for purposes of
Rule 61-501
of the Ontario Securities Commission
(Rule 61-501)
and
Regulation Q-27
of the Quebec Autorité des marchés financiers
(together with
Rule 61-501,
the Rules). In addition, CIBC World Markets
understands that the board of directors of the Company (the
Board) has appointed a committee (the Special
Committee) comprised of members of the Board who are
independent of RDS, the Offeror and Shell Canadas
management to consider the Offer and to make recommendations to
the Board with respect to the Offer.
All dollar amounts herein are expressed in Canadian dollars,
unless stated otherwise.
Engagement
of CIBC World Markets
CIBC World Markets was first contacted by Shell Canada on
October 21, 2006 concerning RDS potential interest in
making an offer to acquire the Common Shares not owned, directly
or indirectly, by RDS. By letter agreement dated
October 28, 2006 (the Engagement Agreement),
Shell Canada retained CIBC World Markets to provide advice and
assistance to the Special Committee in evaluating the
transaction proposed by RDS, including the preparation and
delivery to the Special Committee of a formal valuation of the
Common Shares (the Valuation) in accordance with the
requirements of the Rules and under the supervision of the
Special Committee. In addition, the Special Committee has
requested CIBC World Markets to provide an opinion (the
Opinion) as to the fairness, from a financial point
of view, of the consideration to be offered to the holders of
the Common Shares, other than the Offeror and its affiliates,
pursuant to the Offer. On January 22, 2007, at the request
of the Special Committee, CIBC World Markets orally delivered
the substance of the Valuation and the Opinion.
The Engagement Agreement provides for a payment to CIBC World
Markets of an engagement and work fee, a fee upon our completion
of certain preliminary financial analyses, a fee upon our
delivery of the Valuation and a fee upon our delivery of the
Opinion. None of the fees payable to us under the Engagement
Agreement are contingent upon the conclusions reached by us in
the Valuation or Opinion or the completion of the Offer. In
addition, the Company has agreed to reimburse CIBC World Markets
for its reasonable expenses and to indemnify CIBC World Markets
in respect of certain liabilities that might arise out of its
engagement. The fees payable to CIBC World Markets pursuant to
the Engagement Agreement are not financially material to CIBC
World Markets. No understandings or agreements exist between
CIBC World Markets, RDS or the Offeror with respect to future
financial advisory or investment banking business.
A-1
Credentials
of CIBC World Markets
CIBC World Markets is one of Canadas largest investment
banking firms with operations in all facets of corporate and
government finance, mergers and acquisitions, equity and fixed
income sales and trading and investment research. The opinion
expressed herein is the opinion of CIBC World Markets and the
form and content herein have been approved for release by a
committee of our managing directors and internal counsel, each
of whom is experienced in merger, acquisition, divestiture and
valuation matters.
Relationships
with Interested Parties
None of CIBC World Markets or its affiliates:
|
|
|
|
a)
|
is an issuer insider, associated entity
or affiliated entity of RDS or the Offeror as such
terms are used in
Rule 61-501;
|
|
|
|
|
b)
|
is a financial advisor to RDS or the Offeror in connection with
the Offer;
|
|
|
|
|
c)
|
is a manager or co-manager of a soliciting dealer group formed
to solicit acceptances of the Offer or will it, as a member of
such group, perform services beyond the customary soliciting
dealers functions nor will it receive more than the per
share or per shareholder fee payable to other members of the
group; or
|
|
|
|
|
d)
|
has a financial incentive with respect to the conclusions
reached in the Valuation or the Opinion nor has a material
financial interest in the completion of the Offer.
|
Prior to entering into the Engagement Agreement, CIBC World
Markets has provided various financial advisory services to
Shell Canada in connection with transactions unrelated to the
Offer. The fees paid to CIBC World Markets by Shell Canada and
its affiliates were not financially material to CIBC World
Markets. CIBC World Markets acts as a trader and dealer, both as
principal and agent, in major financial markets and, as such,
may have had, and may in the future have, positions in the
securities of Shell Canada, RDS or their affiliates and, from
time to time, may have executed, or may execute, transactions on
behalf of such entities. CIBC World Markets is an indirect
subsidiary of the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
(CIBC) and CIBC or its affiliated entities have made
or may in the future make loans or provide other financial
services in the normal course to Shell Canada, RDS or their
affiliates.
Scope of
Review
In connection with preparing the Valuation, we have reviewed or
relied upon, among other things, the following:
|
|
|
|
i)
|
the annual reports, including the comparative audited financial
statements and managements discussion and analysis, of
Shell Canada for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003,
2004 and 2005;
|
|
|
ii)
|
the interim reports, including the comparative unaudited
financial statements and managements discussion and
analysis, of Shell Canada for the three, six and nine months
ended March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006 and
September 30, 2006;
|
|
|
iii)
|
a draft dated January 22, 2007 of a Shell Canada press
release containing Shell Canadas financial and operating
results for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006;
|
|
|
iv)
|
Shell Canadas annual information form dated March 10,
2006;
|
|
|
v)
|
the management information circular of Shell Canada dated
March 23, 2006 relating to the annual meeting of
shareholders held on April 28, 2006;
|
|
|
vi)
|
material change reports filed by Shell Canada with Canadian
securities regulatory authorities since December 31, 2005;
|
|
|
vii)
|
a Shell Canada public disclosure document entitled Shell
Canada Oil Sands Expansion: Jackpine Mine Expansion & Pierre
River Mine dated January 2007;
|
|
|
viii)
|
the annual report, including the comparative audited financial
statements and managements discussion and analysis, of
BlackRock Ventures Inc. (BlackRock) for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2005;
|
|
|
ix)
|
BlackRocks annual information form dated March 21,
2006;
|
A-2
|
|
|
|
x)
|
certain internal financial, operational, business, tax and other
information concerning Shell Canada that was prepared or
provided by the management of Shell Canada, including internal
operating and financial budgets and projections, and the 2006
and 2007 business plans as approved by the Board;
|
|
|
xi)
|
estimated reserve volumes as at December 31, 2005 for Shell
Canada as prepared by the Companys internal qualified
reserves evaluators and as approved by the Companys
management;
|
|
|
xii)
|
estimated reserve volumes as at March 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005 for BlackRock as prepared by Sproule
Associates Limited (Sproule), independent reservoir
engineers;
|
|
|
xiii)
|
estimated undeveloped and developed land acreage as at
October 10, 2006 for Shell Canada as prepared by the
Companys management;
|
|
|
xiv)
|
discussions with Ryder Scott Company, L.P., independent
reservoir engineers, with respect to its audit of the
methodology utilized by Shell Canada for the internal evaluation
of its conventional oil and gas reserves;
|
|
|
xv)
|
discussions with Sproule, with respect to its audit of the
methodology utilized by Shell Canada for the internal evaluation
of its oil sands reserves;
|
|
|
xvi)
|
discussions with and analyses produced by Muse,
Stancil & Co. (Muse Stancil), a global
consulting firm specializing in the energy industry, with
respect to the petroleum refining and marketing sector;
|
|
|
xvii)
|
selected trading statistics and relevant financial information
of Shell Canada and other public entities;
|
|
|
xviii)
|
selected relevant precedent transactions and comparable company
trading multiples and analysis;
|
|
|
xix)
|
selected relevant reports published by equity research analysts
and industry sources regarding Shell Canada and other publicly
traded entities;
|
|
|
xx)
|
a draft dated January 22, 2007 of the Support Agreement,
which outlines the terms of agreement between the Offeror and
Shell Canada with respect to the Offer;
|
|
|
xxi)
|
certificates addressed to us, dated as of the date hereof, from
two senior officers of Shell Canada as to the completeness and
accuracy of the information provided to us by Shell Canada; and
|
|
|
xxii)
|
such other information, analyses, investigations, and
discussions as we considered necessary or appropriate in the
circumstances.
|
In addition, we have participated in discussions with members of
the senior management of Shell Canada regarding Shell
Canadas past and current business operations, reserves,
other assets, financial condition and prospects. We have also
participated in discussions with RDS, Morgan Stanley & Co.
Limited and Scotia Waterous Inc., financial advisors to RDS,
regarding the Offer, the Valuation and related matters. In
addition, we have participated in discussions with Ogilvy
Renault LLP, legal counsel to the Special Committee, regarding
the Offer and related matters. To the best of its knowledge,
CIBC World Markets has not been denied access by Shell Canada to
any information it has requested.
Prior
Valuations
Shell Canada has represented to CIBC World Markets that no prior
valuation (as defined in
Rule 61-501)
has been prepared in the past 24 months.
Assumptions
and Limitations
Our Valuation is subject to the assumptions and limitations
below.
With the Special Committees permission and subject to the
exercise of our professional judgement, we have relied upon and
have assumed the completeness, accuracy and fair presentation of
all financial and other information, data, advice, opinions and
representations obtained by us from public sources, or provided
to us by the Company or its affiliates or advisors or otherwise
obtained by us pursuant to our engagement, and our Valuation is
conditional upon such completeness, accuracy and fair
presentation. We have not been requested to or attempted to
verify independently the accuracy, completeness or fairness of
presentation of any such information, data, advice, opinions and
representations. We have not met separately with the independent
auditors of Shell Canada in connection with preparing this
Valuation and,
A-3
with the Special Committees permission, we have assumed
the accuracy and fair presentation of, and relied upon, the
Companys audited financial statements and the reports of
the auditors thereon.
With respect to operating and financial forecasts and budgets
provided to us concerning Shell Canada and relied upon in our
analysis, we have assumed (subject to the exercise of our
professional judgement) that they have been prepared on bases
reflecting the most reasonable assumptions, estimates and
judgements of management of the Company, having regard to the
Companys business plans, financial condition and prospects.
The Company has represented to us, in a certificate of two
senior officers of the Company dated the date hereof that, among
other things, the information, data and other materials provided
to us by or on behalf of the Company, including the written
information and discussions concerning Shell Canada referred to
above under the heading Scope of Review
(collectively, the Shell Canada Information), are
complete and correct at the date the Shell Canada Information
was provided to us and that, since the date of the Shell Canada
Information, there has been no material change, financial or
otherwise, in the financial condition, assets, liabilities
(contingent or otherwise), business, operations or prospects of
the Company and its subsidiaries and no material change has
occurred in the Shell Canada Information or any part thereof
which would have or which would reasonably be expected to have a
material effect on the Valuation.
Except as expressly noted under the heading Scope of
Review, we have not conducted any investigation concerning
the financial condition, assets, liabilities (contingent or
otherwise), business, operations or prospects of Shell Canada or
its subsidiaries. We have not attempted to verify independently
any of the information concerning the Company or any of its
subsidiaries. CIBC World Markets was not authorized to solicit,
and did not solicit, interest from any other potential party
with respect to the acquisition of the Common Shares, or any
business combinations or other extraordinary transactions
involving Shell Canada.
We are not legal, tax or accounting experts and we express no
opinion concerning any legal, tax or accounting matters
concerning the Offer.
Our Valuation is rendered on the basis of securities markets,
economic and general business and financial conditions
prevailing as at the date hereof and the conditions and
prospects, financial and otherwise, of the Company as they are
reflected in the Shell Canada Information and as they were
represented to us in our discussions with management of the
Company and its advisors. In our analyses and in connection with
the preparation of our Valuation, we made numerous assumptions
with respect to industry performance, general business, capital
markets and economic conditions and other matters, many of which
are beyond the control of any party involved in the Offer.
With the Special Committees permission and in accordance
with its determination that the perceived detriment to the
Company of the disclosure of certain sensitive information
outweighs the potential benefit of the disclosure of such
information to the readers of the Valuation, certain detailed
information concerning the Company has been aggregated and
certain portions of our analysis have been presented in summary
form for purposes of disclosure in this Valuation.
This Valuation has been provided to the Special Committee for
its exclusive use in considering the Offer and may not be relied
upon by any person, other than the Special Committee and the
Board, or used for any other purpose or published without the
prior written consent of CIBC World Markets. Our Valuation is
not to be construed as a recommendation to any holder of the
Common Shares to accept or reject the Offer.
The Valuation is given as of the date hereof (the
Valuation Date) and, although we reserve the right
to change or withdraw the Valuation if we learn that any of the
information that we relied upon in preparing the Valuation was
inaccurate, incomplete or misleading in any material respect, we
disclaim any obligation to change or withdraw the Valuation, to
advise any person of any change that may come to our attention
or to update the Valuation after today.
CIBC World Markets believes that its financial analyses must be
considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its
analyses and the factors considered by it, without considering
all factors and analyses together, could create a misleading
view of the process underlying the Valuation. The preparation of
a valuation is complex and is not necessarily susceptible to
partial analysis or summary description and any attempt to do so
could lead to undue emphasis on any particular factor or
analysis.
A-4
Overview
of Shell Canada
The following description is derived from the Shell Canada
Information.
Shell Canada is a Canadian integrated petroleum company with
operations in three business segments: Oil Sands, Exploration
and Production and Oil Products. Shell Canadas origins
date back to 1911 when RDS predecessors first established
operations in Canada. Shell Canadas shares were first
offered to public investors in 1962.
Oil
Sands
Shell Canada holds a 60 percent interest in the Athabasca
Oil Sands Project (the AOSP). The AOSP is a joint
venture partnership among Shell Canada (60 percent), Chevron
Canada Limited (20 percent) and Western Oil Sands L.P. (20
percent). The AOSPs fully integrated operations include
the Muskeg River Mine and extraction plant located north of
Fort McMurray in northern Alberta and the Scotford Upgrader
located adjacent to Shell Canadas Scotford Refinery near
Edmonton, Alberta. As the majority owner, Shell Canada is the
overall project administrator as well as operator of the
Scotford Upgrader. Albian Sands Energy Inc., a company created
by the AOSP joint venture, operates the Muskeg River Mine. The
Corridor Pipeline System (Corridor), which is owned
by a third party, transports diluted bitumen from the Muskeg
River Mine to the Scotford Upgrader, and connects the Scotford
Upgrader with pipeline and marketing terminals in the Edmonton
area. Corridor also provides oil storage facilities required for
the AOSP.
The AOSP was officially opened and began fully integrated
operations at the Muskeg River Mine and Scotford Upgrader in
June 2003. In the fourth quarter of 2006, Shell Canadas
share of bitumen production from the AOSP averaged 106,600
barrels per day (bbl/d).
During the fourth quarter of 2006, Shell Canada received Alberta
Energy and Utilities Board approval for the Muskeg River Mine
Expansion, a 100,000 bbl/d expansion of the oil sands mining and
upgrading facilities (AOSP Expansion 1). After AOSP
Expansion 1, Shell Canadas partners to the joint venture
will no longer have a right to participate in Shell
Canadas upgrading expansion projects. Beyond AOSP
Expansion 1, Shell Canada plans additional oil sands expansions
that the Company estimates could potentially increase its
minable bitumen production to approximately 770,000 bbl/d, which
includes the Muskeg River Mine at 270,000 bbl/d and the Jackpine
Mine at 200,000 bbl/d, both of which have received regulatory
approval. In addition to existing regulatory approvals and
expansion plans, Shell Canadas growth strategy also
includes added mining areas to support expansion of production,
including Pierre River Mine, on the west side of the Athabasca
River, which will expand the production base by 200,000 bbl/d,
as well as further expansion of the Jackpine Mine to 300,000
bbl/d. Shell Canadas current assessment of bitumen in
place to support the proposed expansion of the AOSP is
approximately 6 billion barrels, which brings the
Companys total assessment of bitumen in place for its
approved and proposed minable development of the AOSP to
approximately 10 billion barrels. According to the Company,
the timing of these developments is dependent upon market
conditions, key economic indicators, the ability to meet Shell
Canadas sustainable development criteria and the outcome
of the regulatory process.
The Oil Sands business unit is also responsible for Shell
Canadas Peace River in situ bitumen business. The Shell
Canada Peace River Complex is located in northern Alberta, about
40 kilometres northeast of Peace River. Enhanced oil recovery
techniques involving steam-generated heat and pressure are used
to recover bitumen.
In July 2006, Shell Canada added to its in situ oil sands assets
through its $2.4 billion acquisition of BlackRock.
BlackRocks operations range from conventional heavy oil
production in Alberta to steam assisted gravity drainage
activities in the Alberta oil sands.
Shell Canadas Peace River in situ oil sands assets and the
BlackRock in situ oil sands assets will be referred to herein as
the Other Oil Sands assets. Total average in situ
production from the Other Oil Sands in the fourth quarter of
2006 averaged 20,400 bbl/d.
Shell Canada is also investigating the application of in situ
Upgraded Production (IUP) technology. IUP technology
involves heating the heavy oil bitumen within the ground,
upgrading the oil to a higher quality and allowing it to flow to
the surface.
A-5
Exploration
and Production
Shell Canada has been engaged in the exploration for and
production of crude oil and natural gas in Canada since 1939.
Shell Canada sold its conventional crude oil producing interests
in 1999. Through its Exploration and Production business unit,
Shell Canada explores for, produces and markets natural gas,
natural gas liquids (ethane, propane, butane, and condensate)
and sulphur from the Foothills region of southern Alberta and
northeastern British Columbia. The Company also has a
31.3 percent share of the Sable Offshore Energy Project,
which produces natural gas and natural gas liquids from
reservoirs located offshore the coast of Nova Scotia. This
business unit also has an unconventional gas segment focused on
basin-centred gas production in the Chinook region of Alberta
and British Columbia and coal bed methane in southeastern and
northwestern British Columbia and the Foothills region of
Alberta. The Exploration and Production business unit has
secured land positions in a number of frontier regions,
including the following: the Orphan Basin (offshore Newfoundland
and Labrador); the Mackenzie Delta; the Beaufort Sea; and off
the west coast of British Columbia.
Shell Canada operates and has substantial interests in natural
gas plants in Alberta and has substantial interests in natural
gas plants in Nova Scotia, which process approximately
80 percent of its current sales volume. The remaining sales
volumes are processed in other natural gas processing plants in
Alberta, in which Shell Canada has varying interests or to which
it has access under processing agreements.
As of December 31, 2005, the Exploration and Production
business unit had natural gas and natural gas liquids net
reserves (after royalties) that, in aggregate, totalled
251.5 million barrels of oil equivalent (mmboe)
and 14 million long tons of net reserves of sulphur.
The Oil Sands and Exploration and Production business units are
managed and operated by Shell Canada Energy, a partnership
wholly owned by the Company.
Oil
Products
Shell Canadas Oil Products business unit is responsible
for the Companys petroleum refining business which
manufactures, distributes and markets refined petroleum
products. Refined petroleum products, as well as specialty items
for the automotive, commercial, farm and home markets, are
marketed across Canada, principally under Shell trademarks.
Shell Canada is also a major supplier of aviation fuels and
lubricants to international and domestic airlines, and of marine
fuels and lubricants to ships in Canadian ports. The Oil
Products business unit also procures crude oil and feedstocks
for Shell Canadas refineries in Montreal, Quebec; Sarnia,
Ontario; and Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta. The refineries
convert crude oil into gasoline, diesel, aviation fuels,
solvents, lubricants, asphalt and heavy fuel oils. Shell Canada
owns three refineries that had 2005 aggregate intake capacity of
approximately 324,000 bbl/d. At year end 2005, the Company had a
Canada-wide network of 1,681 retail sites, many of which include
convenience food stores and car wash facilities. Shell Canada
directly operates 760 of these sites. The Oil Products business
unit is managed and operated through Shell Canada Products, a
partnership wholly owned by the Company.
A-6
Trading
Range and Volume of Shares
The Common Shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange
(TSX) and trade under the symbol SHC.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the
reported high and low closing prices and the aggregate volume of
trading of the Common Shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSX
|
|
|
|
Closing Prices
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January
|
|
$
|
46.90
|
|
|
$
|
40.18
|
|
|
|
10,156,120
|
|
February
|
|
$
|
44.85
|
|
|
$
|
38.15
|
|
|
|
10,353,465
|
|
March
|
|
$
|
41.72
|
|
|
$
|
37.92
|
|
|
|
7,490,277
|
|
April
|
|
$
|
45.84
|
|
|
$
|
41.65
|
|
|
|
7,609,638
|
|
May
|
|
$
|
42.21
|
|
|
$
|
38.08
|
|
|
|
9,860,305
|
|
June
|
|
$
|
41.50
|
|
|
$
|
38.18
|
|
|
|
6,841,513
|
|
July
|
|
$
|
42.50
|
|
|
$
|
38.63
|
|
|
|
8,301,097
|
|
August
|
|
$
|
40.47
|
|
|
$
|
35.80
|
|
|
|
10,004,389
|
|
September
|
|
$
|
36.64
|
|
|
$
|
30.40
|
|
|
|
11,956,141
|
|
October 1 to October 20
|
|
$
|
32.80
|
|
|
$
|
29.14
|
|
|
|
7,906,274
|
|
October 23 to October 31
|
|
$
|
42.91
|
|
|
$
|
42.55
|
|
|
|
41,313,034
|
|
November
|
|
$
|
43.35
|
|
|
$
|
42.68
|
|
|
|
25,636,822
|
|
December
|
|
$
|
43.85
|
|
|
$
|
43.13
|
|
|
|
10,722,307
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1 19
|
|
$
|
44.92
|
|
|
$
|
42.40
|
|
|
|
26,701,245
|
|
Source: Bloomberg Financial Markets.
On October 20, 2006, the trading day immediately prior to
RDS initial announcement that it may pursue an acquisition
of the publicly held Common Shares, the closing price of the
Common Shares on the TSX was $32.80.
Historical
Results of Operations
Set out in the tables below are summaries of Shell Canadas
operating and financial results for the last five completed
fiscal years.
Production
Data (Net of Royalties)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas (mmcf/d)
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
Natural Gas Liquids (mbbl/d)
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
31.7
|
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
Bitumen (mbbl/d)
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
54.9
|
|
|
|
88.4
|
|
|
|
103.7
|
|
|
|
93.7
|
|
Crude oil processed by Shell
Canada refineries
(m3/d)
|
|
|
41,400
|
|
|
|
42,900
|
|
|
|
45,100
|
|
|
|
44,900
|
|
|
|
44,600
|
|
Note: mmcf/d = millions of cubic feet per day; mbbl/d =
thousands of barrels per day;
m3/d
= cubic metres per day.
A-7
Income
and Cash Flow Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net Earnings
|
|
$
|
561
|
|
|
$
|
810
|
|
|
$
|
1,286
|
|
|
$
|
2,001
|
|
|
$
|
1,738
|
|
Cash Flow from Operations
|
|
$
|
1,227
|
|
|
$
|
1,701
|
|
|
$
|
2,129
|
|
|
$
|
3,036
|
|
|
$
|
2,614
|
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
$
|
2,289
|
|
|
$
|
713
|
|
|
$
|
951
|
|
|
$
|
1,715
|
|
|
$
|
2,426
|
1
|
Earnings per Share (fully diluted)
|
|
$
|
2.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
|
$
|
1.55
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
2.09
|
|
|
|
1 |
Excludes acquisition of BlackRock.
|
Balance
Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
|
Working
Capital1
|
|
$
|
(1,325
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,091
|
)
|
|
$
|
(188
|
)
|
|
$
|
933
|
|
|
$
|
(1,714
|
)
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
9,355
|
|
|
$
|
9,613
|
|
|
$
|
10,906
|
|
|
$
|
13,666
|
|
|
$
|
17,556
|
|
Long-term Debt (excl. Current
Portion)
|
|
$
|
523
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
$
|
4,278
|
|
|
$
|
4,075
|
|
|
$
|
4,377
|
|
|
$
|
5,467
|
|
|
$
|
7,976
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
$
|
5,077
|
|
|
$
|
5,538
|
|
|
$
|
6,529
|
|
|
$
|
8,199
|
|
|
$
|
9,580
|
|
|
|
1 |
Working capital = current assets current liabilities.
|
Reserves
As of December 31, 2005, Shell Canada had total net proved
reserves of 1,185 billion cubic feet
(bcf ) of natural gas, 54 million barrels
(mmbbls) of natural gas liquids, 774 mmbbls of
bitumen and 14 million long tons of sulphur.
As of December 31, 2005, BlackRock had total net proved
heavy oil reserves of 111 mmbbls and total net proved natural
gas reserves of 2.4 bcf.
Management has advised CIBC World Markets that the gross proved
conventional reserves as of December 31, 2006 are
approximately 12% lower than those as at December 31, 2005.
Management has also advised that bitumen reserves have increased
significantly as at December 31, 2006 compared to
December 31, 2005.
Landholdings
As of December 31, 2005, Shell Canada had 19.1 million
net acres of undeveloped land (1.9 million acres onshore
within the provinces and 17.2 million acres off the east
and west coasts of Canada and in northern Canada).
As of December 31, 2005, BlackRock had 267,554 net acres of
undeveloped land.
General
Approach to Value Analysis
CIBC World Markets approached the value analysis of Shell Canada
in accordance with the Rules, which, in the case of an insider
bid such as the Offer, require the valuator to make a
determination as to the fair market value of the Common Shares.
Rule 61-501
defines fair market value as the monetary
consideration that, in an open and unrestricted market, a
prudent and informed buyer would pay to a prudent and informed
seller, each acting at arms length with the other and
under no compulsion to act, but without making any downward
adjustment to reflect the liquidity of the securities, the
effect of the transaction on the securities or the fact that the
securities do not form part of a controlling interest.
Consequently, this Valuation provides a conclusion on a per
Common Share basis with respect to Shell Canadas en
bloc value, being the price at which all of the Common
Shares could be sold to one or more buyers at the same time.
A-8
Our
Approach and Valuation Methodologies
CIBC World Markets approached the valuation of the Common Shares
by applying two principal methodologies:
|
|
|
|
i)
|
a discounted cash flow (DCF) approach; and
|
|
|
ii)
|
a sum of the parts net asset value (NAV)
approach.
|
In addition, CIBC World Markets reviewed historical trading data
for Shell Canada, bid premia from precedent transactions and
research analyst target prices.
Application
of Valuation Methodologies
Discounted
Cash Flow Approach
CIBC World Markets prepared a comprehensive DCF analysis of
Shell Canada to assist in determining the fair market value of
the Common Shares. CIBC World Markets believes the DCF approach
is the most appropriate methodology for estimating the en
bloc value of Shell Canada and has benchmarked the results
against other valuation methodologies. We further believe that
the DCF approach is the most broadly used valuation methodology
in the oil and gas industry. The DCF approach reflects the
growth prospects and risks inherent in Shell Canadas
operations by taking into account the future free cash flow
generating capability of its assets.
CIBC World Markets DCF approach involved determining a
present value of the projected unlevered after-tax free cash
flows of the assets contained within the Oil Sands (which
includes both the AOSP and the Other Oil Sands assets) and
Exploration and Production business units over a horizon equal
to the remaining life of each asset utilizing a prescribed
discount rate. For the Companys Oil Products business
unit, the DCF analysis included the projected unlevered
after-tax free cash flows for future years until 2040. A
terminal value was included in year 2041 to represent the
remaining value of these assets. These cash flows and terminal
value were also discounted to present values utilizing a
prescribed discount rate.
As a basis for the development of the projected cash flows,
Shell Canada management prepared three unaudited projected
operational cases: a downside case (the Proven
Case), a base case (the Expected Case) and an
upside case (the Upside Case). The information
supplied consisted of production and throughput volumes, fixed
and variable costs, taxes, royalties, maintenance capital and
anticipated capital expenditures, among other operational and
financial information. The projections were supplied with
sufficient information to allow for the determination of
sensitivities with respect to input variables, including costs,
commodity prices and foreign exchange rates. The three cases
represent distinct development scenarios that range from a lower
risk Proven Case that approximates proved reserves for
conventional production (and the approximate equivalent for
bitumen reserves which are not recognized by the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC)) to a higher risk
Upside Case that represents the recovery of substantially
greater resources. We applied our professional judgement to the
results of the three cases and weighted the cases to incorporate
the downside, base and upside projections.
The DCF approach requires that numerous assumptions be made
regarding, among other things, production and throughput
volumes, operating, capital and abandonment costs, and terminal
values. The weakness of the DCF approach is the high element of
subjectivity required to generate financial projections over a
long period of time, although this drawback is partially offset
by testing the outcomes under various assumptions and scenarios.
Assumptions
CIBC World Markets DCF analysis is predicated on a number of
important operating assumptions including the extent of
hydrocarbon reserves and resources, production profiles, and
capital cost estimates for development. Shell Canada estimated
such inputs based on its business plan, its operating experience
and its past history with respect to these variables. CIBC World
Markets reviewed these inputs and discussed them with Shell
Canada management. We also benchmarked key variables against
selected industry comparables. As a result of this review and
comparison, certain adjustments were reflected with regard to
these inputs. In addition, CIBC World Markets made a number of
economic assumptions in the DCF analysis.
A-9
i) Forecast
Scenarios
The three cases assume different resource recovery and
development scenarios for the assets and represent a spectrum of
hydrocarbon volumes to be recovered. The three cases are
characterized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Proven Case: This case represents the most
conservative scenario and is based principally on the
development of proven reserves already identified. The estimated
reserves to be recovered are consistent with volumes estimated
using the SEC proven definition with respect to conventional
reserves. Volumes for bitumen were included on the basis of
operations from AOSPs base mine and AOSP Expansion 1.
|
|
|
|
Expected Case: This case represents the most
likely development scenario and is based on Shell Canadas
Business Plan as approved by its Board. It represents increased
recovery of conventional and in situ production volumes and the
additional AOSP Expansions 1 through 5 of the mining operations.
This case is consistent with that which has been disclosed to
the investment community.
|
|
|
|
Upside Case: This case includes the risked
development of several potential projects, such as AOSP
expansion 6 to the mining operation, the development of Klappan
coal bed methane, the development of certain frontier basins,
and the application of prospective technologies, such as the in
situ upgrading technology.
|
The three cases represent a continuum of potential volumes of
hydrocarbon recoveries that range from lower recovery risk to
higher recovery risk. The evaluation of possible resource
recovery is a key determinant in establishing the potential
value of Shell Canada.
ii) Commodity
Prices
CIBC World Markets reviewed various commodity price information,
including forward strip pricing as of January 19, 2007 and
the current commodity price forecasts used by McDaniel &
Associates Consultants Ltd., Sproule, Paddock
Lindstrom & Associates Ltd., GLJ Petroleum Consultants
Ltd., AJM Petroleum Consultants and DeGolyer and MacNaughton
Canada Limited (collectively, the Independent
Engineers). Based upon our experience with respect to
precedent transactions, industry participant practice and our
review of this information, we determined that an appropriate
forecast could be represented by the average of (i) the
forward strip; and (ii) the average of the Independent
Engineers price forecasts for the period from 2007 to
2011. After 2011, our forecast assumes an annual price increase
of 2%.
The following table sets out the commodity price forecast (in
nominal terms) used in our DCF analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil Price
|
|
|
Natural Gas Price
|
|
|
Natural Gas Price
|
|
|
|
(West Texas Intermediate)
|
|
|
(AECO)
|
|
|
(Henry Hub)
|
|
|
|
(US$ per barrel)
|
|
|
(C$ per gigajoule)
|
|
|
(US$ per mmbtu)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$60.39
|
|
|
|
$6.91
|
|
|
|
$7.38
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$61.64
|
|
|
|
$7.68
|
|
|
|
$8.06
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$60.53
|
|
|
|
$7.62
|
|
|
|
$7.91
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$59.51
|
|
|
|
$7.45
|
|
|
|
$7.70
|
|
2011
|
|
|
$58.88
|
|
|
|
$7.37
|
|
|
|
$7.61
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
+2% per annum
|
|
|
|
+2% per annum
|
|
|
|
+2% per annum
|
|
iii) Refined
Product Pricing
CIBC World Markets used a dynamic pricing model based on inputs
and forecasts provided by Muse Stancil in order to derive
petroleum product pricing forecasts and refining margins for the
Oil Products business unit of Shell Canada. Muse Stancil is a
consulting engineering firm with extensive technical and
commercial experience in the transportation, processing and
marketing sectors of the petroleum, petrochemical and natural
gas industries. The Muse Stancil forecasting methodology is
derived from an analysis of petroleum demand versus refining
capacity in the three major world refining centers: U.S. Gulf
Coast, Rotterdam and Singapore. The price-setting mechanisms are
based on a combination of refining fundamentals and statistical
regression. Parity relationships derived from expected crude and
product flows and based on tariff, freight and quality
differentials are used to derive product prices in other key
markets such as Chicago and New York. Based on the model,
petroleum product prices at each of Shell Canadas
refineries were determined using historical price differentials
in each of those locations versus key markets in the United
States.
A-10
The operations of each of Shell Canadas refineries are
based on crude oil feedstocks being converted into higher value
refined petroleum products through various processes including
the addition of hydrogen, which results in realizing a
volumetric gain. As a result, the higher value refined product
prices minus the crude oil feedstock costs, adjusted for a
volume increase, are the primary drivers of the margins of the
Oil Products business. Under the Muse Stancil pricing model,
refined products prices are determined based on underlying crude
oil, natural gas and other economic and price inputs. The crude
oil, natural gas and other economic and price inputs were
determined by CIBC World Markets as described above. The refined
product prices along with throughput volumes and costs were
utilized in the DCF to generate cash flows for the Oil Products
business unit.
iv) Foreign
Exchange Rate
CIBC World Markets reviewed the Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar
foreign exchange rate forecasts of a number of large Canadian
and international financial institutions. Based on our review of
these forecasts, we determined that the average of these foreign
exchange rate forecasts was a reasonable estimate of future
foreign exchange rates. The table below sets out the foreign
exchange rate forecast used in our DCF analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Exchange Rate Forecast
|
|
|
|
(US$ per C$)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
0.867
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
0.881
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
0.860
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
0.873
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
$
|
0.877
|
|
v) Production
and Throughput Volumes
a) Oil
Sands
For the period 2007 through 2011 the forecast production for
AOSP is consistent among the Proven, Expected and Upside Cases.
Annual production volumes are estimated to grow from
approximately 36 million barrels in 2007 to 57 million
barrels in 2011 and continue increasing thereafter commensurate
with additional expansions. The Expected and Upside Cases
reflect the addition of upgrading capacity in Alberta and a
Sarnia downstream heavy oil integration strategy
(HOIST) commencing in 2013.
With respect to Shell Canadas Other Oil Sands interests,
the annual production volumes under the Expected Case are
estimated to grow from approximately 14 million barrels in
2007 to 31 million barrels in 2011. The production
estimates for the same period for the Proven and Upside Cases
vary from the Expected Case by approximately 20% to 25%.
b) Exploration
and Production
The Proven Case reflects a blow-down scenario
whereby annual production declines from 43 mmboe in 2007 to 23
mmboe in 2011. The Expected Case is predicated on the 2007
business plan and is modelled based on industry-average finding
costs using third-party benchmarking data. Annual production
volumes increase from 47 mmboe in 2007 to 53 mmboe in 2011 and
decline thereafter. The Upside Case involves the additional
development of risked production from Sable Island, Orphan
Basin, Mackenzie Delta and Klappan. Production is estimated to
increase from 48 mmboe in 2007 to 72 mmboe in 2011 and increase
to a peak production of 141 mmboe in 2020, before declining.
c) Oil
Products
Average daily throughput volumes for the period 2007 through
2011 are consistent among the three cases. The yield volumes
range from approximately 340,000 bbl/d to 348,000 bbl/d during
the period. In the Expected and Upside Cases, the HOIST project,
which is an integrated upgrading and refining facility located
in Sarnia, Ontario, is assumed to commence operations in 2013.
Coincident with the start-up of the new and expanded facilities,
the existing Sarnia refinery would be shut down.
A-11
vi) Capital
Expenditures
Estimates of the capital expenditures required under each of the
Proven Case, Expected Case and Upside Case scenarios were
incorporated into the DCF analysis of each business unit. The
forecast capital expenditures were estimated by the Company and
were based on the forecast expansions and developments. CIBC
World Markets reviewed the capital expenditure forecasts for
each division and compared such to capital expenditure forecasts
of similar completed and anticipated projects. The undiscounted
estimated capital for the Proven, Expected, and Upside Cases for
the life of all projects is approximately $44 billion,
$121 billion and $169 billion, respectively.
vii) Terminal
Values
The financial projections for both the mining and in situ assets
within the Oil Sands business and the Exploration and Production
business and are based on life-of-asset operating projections.
Therefore, no terminal values were accorded to these assets.
In the case of the Oil Products business and, we have applied a
terminal value in year 2041 to the refining assets to reflect a
going-concern value for the business and beyond the projection
period. The maintenance capital expenditures utilized in the
projection period are consistent with the assumption that the
refinery assets will have extended life and a terminal value.
CIBC World Markets developed terminal values at the end of the
forecast period by calculating the present values utilizing a
terminal growth rate methodology. This methodology uses
unlevered after-tax free cash flows which were projected to
decline to perpetuity on a real basis. In selecting the range of
growth rates, CIBC World Markets took into consideration the
outlook for long-term inflation and the growth prospects of the
Oil Products business and beyond the terminal year. We also
benchmarked this value using a terminal multiple of cash flow
approach.
viii) Discount
Rate
CIBC World Markets determined an appropriate discount rate based
on a consideration of a number of factors, including: the
theoretical calculation of such rate as described below, a
review of discount rates utilized in or implied by precedent
transactions, a review of the discount rates utilized by equity
research analysts as described in recent published reports on
Shell Canada, and the asset mix of Shell Canada.
CIBC World Markets estimated a weighted average cost of capital
(WACC) to discount the projected unlevered after-tax
free cash flows. The Companys after-tax cost of debt and
its cost of equity were weighted based upon an assumed optimal
capital structure. The assumed optimal capital structure was
determined based upon a review of the capital structures of
comparable companies and the risks inherent in the
Companys business and in the oil and gas industry
generally. The cost of debt for the Company was calculated based
on the risk-free rate of return and an estimated borrowing
spread for Shell Canada to reflect credit risk at the assumed
optimal capital structure. The balance of the capitalization is
represented by common equity, the cost of which was estimated
using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). CAPM
generates a cost of equity by adding a risk-free rate of return
to a premium that represents the financial and non-diversifiable
business risk of the security in question. This premium is the
product of a securitys beta (a statistical measure which
reflects the extent to which a securitys returns co-vary
with those of a broader market index) multiplied by a broader
market premium (equal to the amount by which the market as a
whole has yielded returns in excess of the risk-free rate). CIBC
World Markets carried out a series of calculations and consulted
certain third-party sources in estimating a beta for Shell
Canada and a number of comparable companies. The cost of equity
derived from CAPM does not account for the comparatively lower
risk of investing in larger capitalization companies, even after
adjusting for their systematic (or beta) risk. Consequently, the
estimated cost of equity includes a discount that reflects Shell
Canadas comparative size.
A-12
The assumptions used by CIBC World Markets in estimating the
WACC for the Company were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Debt
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
Rate1
|
|
|
4
|
.9%
|
Borrowing Spread
|
|
|
0
|
.8%
|
Pre-tax Cost of Debt
|
|
|
5
|
.6%
|
Tax
Rate2
|
|
|
30
|
.0%
|
After-tax Cost of Debt
|
|
|
3
|
.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Common Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
Rate1
|
|
|
4
|
.9%
|
Market Risk
Premium3
|
|
|
7
|
.1%
|
Levered
Beta4
|
|
|
0
|
.6
|
Size
Premium/(Discount)3
|
|
|
(0
|
.4%)
|
Cost of Common Equity
|
|
|
9
|
.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
WACC
|
|
|
|
|
Optimal Capital Structure
(Debt/Equity)
|
|
|
15
|
.0%
|
WACC
|
|
|
8
|
.4%
|
|
|
1
|
Yield on a 30-year generic United States government treasury
bond as of January 19, 2007.
|
|
2
|
Based on discussions with Shell Canada management.
|
|
3
|
Based on U.S. data compiled by Ibbotson Associates for the
period from 1926 to 2005 in its 2006 Yearbook.
|
|
4
|
Analysis of betas for Shell Canada and selected comparable
companies relative to the S&P500 Index.
|
Note: Numbers shown above are rounded.
In addition to the calculation outlined above, we also examined
the discount rate assumptions utilized by selected equity
research analysts covering Shell Canada. The after-tax discount
rates ranged from 6.7% to 9.0% and averaged 8.0%, with
approximately two-thirds of analysts using 8.0% as their
discount rate for Shell Canada.
CIBC World Markets believes that the discount rates calculated
above and utilized by equity research analysts covering Shell
Canada are consistent with discount rates used by many companies
transacting in this sector for comparable companies and assets.
Based upon the foregoing, CIBC World Markets determined the
appropriate WACC for the Company to be in the range of 8.0% to
8.5%.
Summary
of Projections
Under the Expected Case, and utilizing the commodity price and
financial assumptions we determined, the undiscounted operating
cash flow is estimated to aggregate to $393 billion for the
lives of the assets. The aggregate estimated undiscounted
capital expenditures are $121 billion. Many of the capital
expenditures occur in the earlier years to fund development of
assets. Under the Expected Case, the Company is estimated to
achieve positive free cash flow, on a cumulative basis, in the
year 2018. The table below illustrates the operating cash flow,
capital expenditures, and the free cash flow forecasts for the
next five years and the aggregate amounts for the projection
periods.
Total
Corporate Undiscounted Free Cash Flow Summary (Expected
Case)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Over
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Projection Periods
|
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
|
Operating Cash Flow
|
|
$
|
3,174
|
|
|
$
|
3,236
|
|
|
$
|
2,349
|
|
|
$
|
3,988
|
|
|
$
|
5,507
|
|
|
$
|
392,987
|
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
|
3,332
|
|
|
|
4,155
|
|
|
|
5,182
|
|
|
|
6,365
|
|
|
|
8,695
|
|
|
|
120,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free Cash
Flow1
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(919
|
)
|
|
|
(2,833
|
)
|
|
|
(2,377
|
)
|
|
|
(3,188
|
)
|
|
|
272,465
|
|
|
|
1 |
Free cash flow is defined as undiscounted unlevered operating
cash flow (after tax) less undiscounted capital expenditures.
|
Note: The 2009 cash flow reflects impact of tax.
A-13
Summary
of DCF Analysis
CIBC World Markets relied primarily on the Expected Case,
applying a weighting of approximately 70%. A weighting of
approximately 15% was accorded to each of the Proven and Upside
Cases. The present value of the unlevered after-tax free cash
flows derived from the DCF analysis represents the aggregate
value of Shell Canadas operating assets. To arrive at an
equity value, and subsequently an equity value per Common Share,
CIBC World Markets has made a number of adjustments. These
adjustments included, among other things, adjustments for net
debt as of December 31, 2006, potential future tax deferred
benefits, certain inventory adjustments, present value of
unfunded pension liabilities and the estimated present value of
future asset retirement obligations not already reflected in the
DCF analysis.
Summary
of Weighted DCF Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WACC
|
|
|
|
8.5%
|
|
|
8.0%
|
|
|
|
($ millions, except per Common Share amounts)
|
|
|
Present Value of Free Cash
Flow1
|
|
$
|
36,925
|
|
|
$
|
41,449
|
|
Less: Debt and Working Capital
Deficit2
|
|
$
|
(1,911
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,911
|
)
|
Plus: Option
Proceeds3
|
|
$
|
520
|
|
|
$
|
520
|
|
Other
Adjustments4
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Equity Value
|
|
$
|
35,628
|
|
|
$
|
40,152
|
|
Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding
(mm)
|
|
|
847.0
|
|
|
|
847.0
|
|
Estimated DCF Value per Common
Share
|
|
$
|
42.06
|
|
|
$
|
47.40
|
|
|
|
1
|
Based on weighted average of Proven Case (15%), Expected Case
(70%), and Upside Case (15%).
|
|
2
|
As per December 31, 2006 unaudited financials.
|
|
3
|
Source: Shell Canada option schedule.
|
|
4
|
Includes unfunded pension liability, asset retirement
obligations and certain inventory adjustments.
|
The equity value per Common Share was determined to be in the
range of approximately $42 to $47.
Sensitivity
Analysis
The following table demonstrates the impact on Shell
Canadas estimated equity value per Common Share of
changing key economic variables contained within the DCF
analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact per
|
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
Change
|
|
Common
Share1
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
Price of Oil (WTI)
|
|
+US$1.00/bbl
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
|
4
|
.1%
|
Price of Gas (AECO)
|
|
+C$0.25/GJ
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
0
|
.7%
|
Light/Heavy Differential
|
|
+US$1.00/bbl
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
0
|
.1%
|
Capital Costs
|
|
+5%
|
|
$
|
(2.42
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
.6)%
|
WACC
|
|
+0.25%
|
|
$
|
(2.59
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
.0)%
|
CAD/USD Exchange Rate
|
|
+C$0.01
|
|
$
|
(1.29
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
.0)%
|
|
|
1 |
Using mid-point WACC of 8.25% and a weighting of Proven,
Expected and Upside Cases.
|
Sum
of the Parts Net Asset Value Approach
Using the NAV approach, a value for the Company is estimated by
separately considering the value of each operating, development,
exploration and financial asset. The individual asset values are
estimated utilizing primarily precedent transaction and
comparable company trading analyses.
The market trading multiples of public companies that operate in
businesses similar to those of Shell Canada were reviewed and
used to estimate individual asset values. The multiples used
included measures of i) total enterprise value (TEV)
to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization (EBITDA) referred to as
TEV/EBITDA, ii)
A-14
Adjusted TEV to the quantity of net proved reserves
(Adjusted TEV/Net Proved Reserve), and iii) Adjusted
TEV to barrels per day of net current production (Adjusted
TEV/Net Current Production). Each of these multiples is
frequently observed by industry participants and the investment
community as key measures for valuing assets or companies in
various sectors of the oil and gas industry.
The results of the comparable companies approach were adjusted
for a premium based on comparable change-of-control transactions
to reflect an en bloc value for each of the assets.
We applied premia to TEV in our analysis for the various assets
given that Shell Canadas net debt is held at the corporate
level and not allocated to any particular asset or division.
This methodology is further supported by the fact that Shell
Canada has relatively low debt. We reviewed both the premia to
market trading values for shares and premia to TEV of a number
of precedent transactions in the Canadian oil and gas industry
and for other large Canadian acquisition transactions to
determine appropriate premia with regard to Shell Canadas
assets.
The precedent transaction method considers transaction prices in
the context of the purchase or sale of a comparable company or
asset to estimate the en bloc value of a particular
asset. The prices paid for companies and assets in various
sectors of the oil and gas industry which are subject to
arms length transactions provide a general measure of the
relative value. Factors such as comparability of asset and
commodity mix, asset quality and profitability, stage of
development, brand recognition, location and size may all be
considered. For purposes of this analysis and depending on the
asset, the multiples reviewed include the following: TEV/EBITDA,
TEV/Net Proved Reserve, TEV/Net Current Production and TEV to
refining input capacity (TEV/Refining Input
Capacity).
We also estimated the value of certain cost savings (referred to
as the Go to Market cost savings)
expected to be realized from specified initiatives in the Oil
Products business unit. Further, we considered the value of
corporate expenses not allocated to any particular division.
Under the NAV approach, the estimated value for each asset is
summed to produce a total asset value. To arrive at a net asset
value, we deducted the Companys net debt and an estimate
of the present value of corporate expenses that are not directly
assignable to each individual asset. We also adjusted to account
for the proceeds received upon the exercise of stock options and
other employee stock incentive plans in order to arrive at an
equity value per Common Share.
There are a limited number of companies directly comparable to
Shell Canadas assets. The entities reviewed in the
comparable companies method may have different operating,
geographical and size profiles than the assets of Shell Canada.
In addition, certain of the precedent transactions that were
surveyed were executed at different points during commodity
pricing cycles, and many of the companies or assets that have
been acquired have different operating profiles than the assets
of Shell Canada. For these reasons, the NAV approach has been
attributed a lower weighting in our analysis than the DCF
approach.
AOSP
In our NAV approach to valuing Shell Canadas
60 percent interest in the AOSP we examined both the
comparable companies and the precedent transaction methods.
i) Comparable Companies Methodology
In applying this valuation technique to Shell Canadas
60 percent interest in the AOSP, we reviewed the trading
value of Western Oil Sands L.P. (Western Oil Sands),
which holds a 20 percent interest in the AOSP and in other
assets that we deemed immaterial for purposes of our analysis.
Western Oil Sands unaffected total enterprise value is
$5.3 billion (equates to a share price of $28.51). This
value was calculated based on the trading value of Western Oil
Sands shares for the five-trading days prior to and
including November 3, 2006, which is the day prior to
market speculation that Western Oil Sands had initiated a
strategic review process. Our notional value analysis for Shell
Canadas AOSP interest assumes there is incremental value
associated with Shell Canadas interest (relative to
Western Oil Sands interest) because Shell Canada has its
own upgrading solution for its share of bitumen produced from
the project post the completion of the AOSP Expansion 1 and
because Shell Canada is the operator of the AOSP. As a result,
we have added a 5% premium to the value calculated using Western
Oil Sands unaffected TEV.
Accordingly, the market trading value of Shell Canadas
interest in the AOSP was estimated to be approximately
$16.8 billion. We adjusted this market trading value for an
en bloc premium. We concluded that a premium of 20%
A-15
to 30% was appropriate. Consequently, we derived a range of
en bloc values for Shell Canadas AOSP
interests of $20.1 billion to $21.8 billion.
AOSP
Comparable Company Trading Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiplication
Factor2
|
|
|
Estimated Value
|
|
Methodology
|
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions, except multiple ranges and where otherwise noted)
|
|
|
Western Oil Sands Unaffected
TEV1
|
|
$
|
5,318mm
|
|
|
|
3.15x
|
|
|
|
3.15x
|
|
|
$
|
16,752
|
|
|
$
|
16,752
|
|
Plus: Control Premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
En Bloc Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,102
|
|
|
$
|
21,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
Based on trading prices for Western Oil Sands common
shares for the five trading days prior to and including
November 3, 2006.
|
|
2
|
Reflects 60% ownership relative to Western Oil Sands 20%,
and as adjusted for a 5% premium.
|
ii) Precedent
Transaction Methodology
We examined the recent acquisitions of interests in the Syncrude
Canada Limited Joint Venture (Syncrude), an oil
sands mining project comparable in size and scope to AOSP.
Canadian Oil Sands Trust (COS) concluded
acquisitions of Syncrude interests from EnCana Corporation in
2003 and from Talisman Energy Inc. (Talisman) in
January 2007. Given the significant changes in the market for
oil sands assets during the last few years, CIBC World Markets
focused its analysis on the most recent transaction, being
COS purchase of an indirect 1.25% Syncrude interest from
Talisman. Our analysis considered, among other things, the
following factors: i) that both AOSP and Syncrude are integrated
mining and upgrading projects with significant expansion
opportunities and production histories, ii) that the Syncrude
interest purchased by COS from Talisman was subject to certain
royalty burdens, iii) that AOSP and Syncrude, while similar in
many respects, have differences with regard to operating and
capital cost structures, upgrading process and other variables
and iv) that the Talisman/COS transaction was not a control
transaction.
We estimated the price per equivalent barrel of production and
price per estimated barrel of recoverable resource for the
Talisman/COS transaction. We applied more weight to the
production metric methodology. Application of these metrics to
current production and estimated recoverable resource for Shell
Canadas AOSP interest resulted in values which supported
the analysis derived under the comparable company trading
analysis.
Other
Oil Sands
The Other Oil Sands division is comprised of those assets
acquired in the purchase of BlackRock and assets previously
owned by the Company (the Original Assets). The
assets acquired from BlackRock and the Original Assets are
located in close geographic proximity to each other and have
many geological similarities. They comprise both proved reserves
and recoverable resources, which exceed 2 billion barrels,
in the aggregate.
Shell Canada acquired BlackRock for $2.4 billion in July
2006. Given the timing of this acquisition and the oil sands
expertise, technological capability, and financial strength of
the Company, we have concluded that the purchase price continues
to represent a reasonable value for the BlackRock assets. We
prorated the BlackRock value over the Original Assets using
implied metrics per unit of reserves and recoverable resource.
We believe our analysis included value for the entire asset and
therefore no additional land value has been accorded.
Specifically, we estimated the value per unit of gross proved
reserves and per unit of recoverable resource implied by the
acquisition of BlackRock. These estimated unit values were
applied to the gross proved reserves and estimated recoverable
resource volumes for the Original Assets. The value determined
for these Original Assets was added to the $2.4 billion
BlackRock value to derive an estimated value for the
Companys Other Oil Sands assets in the range of
$3.4 billion to $3.8 billion.
We also analyzed trading metrics of selected public companies
with pre-production oil sands assets as a check. These companies
included OPTI Canada Inc., UTS Energy Inc. and Synenco Energy
Ltd.
A-16
Exploration
and Production
In the NAV approach for Shell Canadas Exploration and
Production assets we considered both the comparable companies
method and the precedent transactions method.
i) Comparable
Companies Methodology
In applying this valuation technique we reviewed the trading
multiples of comparable North American natural-gas weighted
exploration and production companies with operations in the
Foothills region of Alberta and the Rocky Mountain region of the
United States. CIBC World Markets believes that the multiples
for the large capitalization companies are the most appropriate
for the purpose of evaluating the Exploration and Production
business unit, given the comparable size, quality and nature of
the respective asset bases.
Selected
Comparable Exploration and Production Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEV3
|
|
|
Adjusted
TEV4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006E
|
|
|
Net Proved
|
|
|
Net Current
|
|
|
|
Share
Price1
|
|
|
Capitalization2
|
|
|
TEV3
|
|
|
EBITDA6
|
|
|
Reserve5
|
|
|
Production5
|
|
|
|
(C$ unless noted)
|
|
|
(C$MM)
|
|
|
(C$MM)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(C$/boe)
|
|
|
(C$/boe/d)
|
|
|
Large Capitalization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EnCana
Corporation7
|
|
US$
|
46.64
|
|
|
$
|
44,137
|
|
|
$
|
50,993
|
|
|
|
4.6x
|
|
|
$
|
15.43
|
|
|
$
|
67,009
|
|
Devon Energy
Corp.7
|
|
US$
|
67.66
|
|
|
$
|
35,741
|
|
|
$
|
43,774
|
|
|
|
5.1x
|
|
|
$
|
18.61
|
|
|
$
|
69,774
|
|
XTO Energy
Inc.7
|
|
US$
|
47.57
|
|
|
$
|
20,858
|
|
|
$
|
24,547
|
|
|
|
6.0x
|
|
|
$
|
18.82
|
|
|
$
|
94,544
|
|
EOG Resources
Inc.7
|
|
US$
|
64.73
|
|
|
$
|
19,018
|
|
|
$
|
19,582
|
|
|
|
5.9x
|
|
|
$
|
18.40
|
|
|
$
|
72,719
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4x
|
|
|
$
|
17.82
|
|
|
$
|
76,012
|
|
Median
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5x
|
|
|
$
|
18.51
|
|
|
$
|
71,247
|
|
Small Capitalization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Mary Land and
Exploration Co.7
|
|
US$
|
34.94
|
|
|
$
|
2,333
|
|
|
$
|
2,790
|
|
|
|
4.6x
|
|
|
$
|
18.59
|
|
|
$
|
60,114
|
|
Compton Petroleum Corp.
|
|
C$
|
10.54
|
|
|
$
|
1,386
|
|
|
$
|
2,182
|
|
|
|
6.5x
|
|
|
$
|
19.58
|
|
|
$
|
82,478
|
|
Bill Barrett
Corp.7
|
|
US$
|
28.54
|
|
|
$
|
1,484
|
|
|
$
|
1,691
|
|
|
|
5.8x
|
|
|
$
|
21.76
|
|
|
$
|
59,860
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7x
|
|
|
$
|
19.98
|
|
|
$
|
67,484
|
|
Median
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8x
|
|
|
$
|
19.58
|
|
|
$
|
60,114
|
|
|
|
1
|
Price data sourced from Bloomberg Financial Markets as of
January 19, 2007.
|
|
2
|
Calculated as of January 19, 2007 based on fully diluted
shares outstanding using the treasury stock method.
|
|
3
|
Calculated as: market capitalization + net debt (total long-term
debt +/- net working capital deficit/surplus) + preferred shares.
|
|
4
|
Adjusted TEV reflects adjustments for undeveloped land.
|
|
5
|
Reserves net of royalties as at December 31, 2005, adjusted
for any subsequent acquisitions and dispositions to date. Net
current production data based on latest available public
disclosure.
|
|
6
|
Estimates sourced from I/B/E/S.
|
|
7
|
U.S. prices converted at the January 19, 2007 exchange rate
US$ per C$ of 0.85.
|
While none of the companies reviewed was considered directly
comparable to the Exploration and Production business unit, CIBC
World Markets selected what it considered to be reasonably
representative trading multiples for seven publicly traded
companies. CIBC World Markets believes the TEV/EBITDA, TEV/Net
Proven Reserve and TEV/Net Current Production multiples to be
the most appropriate multiples to evaluate the Exploration and
Production business unit.
In selecting the multiple ranges shown below, CIBC World Markets
gave consideration to several factors, including asset and
commodity risk, asset quality, growth potential, profitability
and size of the Exploration and Production business unit and the
selected comparable companies reviewed.
As shown in the table below, an average of the values realized
by applying each of these three multiple ranges suggests a
trading market value of the Exploration and Production business
unit of $5.1 billion to $6.0 billion, excluding
undeveloped land. We adjusted the market-based value by applying
a premium to reflect an en bloc value. After having
surveyed recent Canadian-based oil and gas transactions and
large company transactions in other sectors, we concluded that a
TEV premium of 20% to 30% was appropriate. Consequently, we
derived a range of en
A-17
bloc values for Shell Canadas Exploration and
Production business unit (excluding undeveloped land) using the
comparable companies methodology of $6.1 billion to
$7.8 billion.
Exploration
and Production Comparable Company Trading
Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple Range
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Methodology
|
|
Shell Canada Data
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions, except multiple ranges and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where otherwise noted)
|
|
|
TEV/2006 EBITDA
|
|
$
|
1,060 mm
|
|
|
|
4.5x
|
|
|
|
5.5x
|
|
|
$
|
4,770
|
|
|
$
|
5,830
|
|
Adjusted TEV/Net Proven Reserves
|
|
|
252 mmboe
|
|
|
$
|
16.50
|
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
|
$
|
4,150
|
|
|
$
|
5,030
|
|
Adjusted TEV/Net Current
Production1
|
|
|
96,233 boe/d
|
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,255
|
|
|
$
|
7,217
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,058
|
|
|
$
|
6,026
|
|
Plus: Control Premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
En Bloc Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,069
|
|
|
$
|
7,834
|
|
|
|
1 |
Net daily production for the fourth quarter of 2006.
|
ii) Precedent
Transactions Methodology
In applying this valuation technique, CIBC World Markets
reviewed comparable acquisition transactions involving companies
in the oil and gas industry and for which there was sufficient
public information to derive multiples. CIBC World Markets
considered the differences in asset and commodity mix, market
dynamics and economic environment at the time of each
transaction, growth prospects and other factors inherent in the
precedent transactions identified. The five selected
transactions we considered are shown in the table below.
Exploration
and Production Selected Precedent
Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted TEV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset/
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
Current
|
|
Date
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
Target
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Value1
|
|
|
Reserves2
|
|
|
Production2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($MM)
|
|
|
($/net
|
|
|
($/net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
boe)
|
|
|
boe/d)
|
|
|
Sep-06
|
|
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
|
|
Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (Canada)
|
|
Corporate
|
|
$
|
4,551
|
|
|
$
|
16.06
|
|
|
$
|
74,266
|
|
Jun-06
|
|
Anadarko Petroleum Corp.
|
|
Western Gas Resources Inc.
|
|
Corporate
|
|
$
|
5,912
|
|
|
$
|
18.73
|
|
|
$
|
83,666
|
|
Jul-05
|
|
Pogo Producing Company
|
|
Northrock Resources Ltd.
|
|
Corporate
|
|
$
|
2,070
|
|
|
$
|
17.59
|
|
|
$
|
62,576
|
|
May-05
|
|
Total S.A. / ConocoPhillips
|
|
Devon Energy Corp.
|
|
Asset
|
|
$
|
1,416
|
|
|
$
|
18.16
|
|
|
$
|
80,774
|
|
Apr-04
|
|
EnCana Corporation
|
|
Tom Brown Inc.
|
|
Corporate
|
|
$
|
3,685
|
|
|
$
|
17.77
|
|
|
$
|
61,905
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.66
|
|
|
$
|
72,637
|
|
Median
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.77
|
|
|
$
|
74,266
|
|
Source: J.S. Herold Inc. and public data. Production and reserve
figures reported on a net basis (adjusted for royalties) based
on J.S. Herold Inc. methodology.
|
|
1
|
J.S. Herold Inc. transaction value adjusted for C$ per US$
exchange rate on the day of the announcement.
|
|
2
|
Production and reserve multiples adjusted for non-producing
assets at the time of the acquisition based on J.S. Herold Inc.
methodology.
|
CIBC World Markets considered Adjusted TEV/Net Current
Production and to a lesser extent Adjusted TEV/Net Proved
Reserves to be the most appropriate multiples to estimate a
value for the Exploration and Production business unit. The
multiple ranges to be applied to the Exploration and Production
business unit were determined based on our assessment of the
relative quality and nature of the assets compared to those for
the precedent transactions.
The following is a summary of the value of the Exploration and
Production business unit (excluding undeveloped land). As
illustrated, these multiple ranges suggest that the en
bloc value for the Exploration and Production business
unit (excluding undeveloped land) is between $5.5 billion
and $6.4 billion.
A-18
Exploration
and Production Precedent Transaction
Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple Range
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
Methodology
|
|
Shell Canada Data
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Weighting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions, except multiple ranges and where otherwise noted)
|
|
|
Adj. TEV/Net Proved Reserve
|
|
|
252 mmboe
|
|
|
$
|
16.00
|
|
|
$
|
19.00
|
|
|
$
|
4,024
|
|
|
$
|
4,779
|
|
|
|
33%
|
|
Adj. TEV/Net Current
Production1
|
|
|
96,233 boe/d
|
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,255
|
|
|
$
|
7,217
|
|
|
|
67%
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,511
|
|
|
$
|
6,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Net production for the fourth quarter of 2006.
|
Summary: NAV
Approach Exploration and Production
In the NAV approach to the Exploration and Production business
unit, we have applied equal weighting to both the comparable
companies method and the precedent transactions method to arrive
at an estimated en bloc value for the Exploration
and Production business unit (excluding undeveloped land) of
approximately $5.8 billion to $7.1 billion.
Exploration
and Production Value Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Value
|
|
Methodology
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Weighting
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
|
Comparable Company Analysis
|
|
$
|
6,069
|
|
|
$
|
7,834
|
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
$
|
3,035
|
|
|
$
|
3,917
|
|
Precedent Transaction Analysis
|
|
$
|
5,511
|
|
|
$
|
6,404
|
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
$
|
2,756
|
|
|
$
|
3,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
En Bloc Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,791
|
|
|
$
|
7,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undeveloped
Acreage and Frontier Assets
The values estimated for the Exploration and Production business
unit exclude the value of any undeveloped land, comprising both
conventional and unconventional lands and non-producing frontier
assets. Our NAV approach to valuing these assets focused on the
precedent transactions method.
i) Precedent
Transactions Methodology
In applying this valuation technique, we reviewed recent land
sales transactions and work expenditure commitment transactions
for various regions in Canada as well as actual prices paid by
Shell Canada for land purchased since January 2005.
The price paid in 2006 for conventional undeveloped land in
Alberta ranged from $0.51 per acre to $10,188 per acre with an
average of approximately $220 per acre. According to the
Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Board, work expenditure
commitments since 2005 have ranged from $1 per acre to $6,650
per acre, with a weighted average of $79 per acre. Meanwhile,
according to the Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board, there
have been no work expenditure commitments for acreage offshore
Nova Scotia since 2003 when the average expenditure commitment
was $31 per acre. According to data compiled by Indian and
Northern Affairs Canada, work expenditure commitments have a
weighted average of $355 per acre in the Mackenzie Delta region
since 2002 and $40 per acre in the Beaufort region over the same
time period. Acreage off of the west coast of British Columbia
where Shell Canada owns approximately 12.8 million acres
has been subject to a moratorium on development since 1971 and
there are no recent precedent transactions for acreage in this
area. As well, there have been no work commitments for acreage
in the Arctic Islands / Nunavut region since at least 2001.
Shell Canadas acquisition costs of exploration and
development lands, on a weighted average basis, have been $1,028
per acre (range of $11 to $6,334 per acre) since 2005.
After reviewing these precedent transactions, we determined
appropriate values per acre for Shell Canadas undeveloped
acreage and non-producing frontier lands. A summary of this
analysis is presented below.
A-19
Frontier
and Undeveloped Land Value Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value Range/Acre
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Shell Canada Data
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
(000s of net acres)
|
|
|
($/acre)
|
|
|
($/acre)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions, except where otherwise noted)
|
|
|
Conventional Lands
|
|
|
601.9
|
|
|
$
|
565
|
|
|
$
|
665
|
|
|
$
|
340
|
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
Coal Bed Methane Lands
|
|
|
1,066.3
|
|
|
$
|
900
|
|
|
$
|
1,100
|
|
|
$
|
960
|
|
|
$
|
1,173
|
|
Offshore and Frontier
Lands1
|
|
|
17,495.2
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Land Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,476
|
|
|
$
|
1,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Includes acreage off the eastern and western coasts of Canada as
well as in the Mackenzie Delta, Beaufort and Arctic Islands /
Nunavut regions of northern Canada. Value range reflects the mix
of offshore holdings, including the fact that approximately 12.8
mm acres are currently subject to a moratorium on development.
Land data as at October 10, 2006.
|
Based upon the analysis above, we derived a value range for
Shell Canadas non-producing frontier assets and
undeveloped acreage of $1.5 billion to $1.8 billion.
Oil
Products
In our NAV approach for Shell Canadas Oil Products
business unit we examined both the comparable companies method
and the precedent transactions method.
i) Comparable Companies Methodology
In applying this valuation technique we reviewed the trading
multiples of comparable North American refining and marketing
companies, which are shown in the table below.
Selected
Comparable Oil Products Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEV
|
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007E
|
|
|
|
Price1
|
|
|
Capitalization2
|
|
|
TEV3
|
|
|
EBITDA6
|
|
|
|
(US$)
|
|
|
(C$MM)
|
|
|
(C$MM)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refiners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valero Energy
Corp.4,5
|
|
$
|
51.04
|
|
|
$
|
37,803
|
|
|
$
|
41,475
|
|
|
|
4.5x
|
|
Sunoco
Inc.4
|
|
$
|
60.28
|
|
|
$
|
8,727
|
|
|
$
|
11,938
|
|
|
|
5.2x
|
|
Western Refining
Inc.4
|
|
$
|
25.89
|
|
|
$
|
2,122
|
|
|
$
|
1,827
|
|
|
|
6.3x
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3x
|
|
|
|
1
|
Price data sourced from Bloomberg Financial Markets as of
January 19, 2007.
|
|
2
|
Calculated as of January 19, 2007 based on fully diluted
shares outstanding using the treasury stock method.
|
|
3
|
Calculated as: market cap + net debt (total long term debt
+/ net working capital deficit/surplus) + minority
interest + preferred shares.
|
|
4
|
U.S. companies converted at the January 19, 2007
US$ per C$ exchange rate of 0.85.
|
|
5
|
Minority interest excluded as analyst community reports EBITDA
net of equity interest in Valero GP Holdings, LLC.
|
|
6
|
Estimates sourced from I/B/E/S.
|
CIBC World Markets selected what it considered to be reasonably
representative public trading multiples for the three
publicly-traded companies referred to above. The TEV to
estimated EBITDA multiple for 2007 was determined to be the most
comparable trading multiple for the Oil Products business unit.
In selecting the multiple range shown below, CIBC World Markets
gave consideration to several factors, including quality of
assets, asset mix, growth potential, profitability and size
differential between the Oil Products business unit and the
companies reviewed. We also considered the relative high quality
of Shell Canadas Scotford refinery and the potential
EBITDA growth for the Oil Products business unit. The values
determined were adjusted by control premia of 20%
30% to reflect en bloc values for the Oil Products
assets, as indicated in the table below.
A-20
Oil
Products Comparable Company Trading
Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shell Canada
|
|
|
Multiple Range
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Methodology
|
|
Data1
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions, except multiple ranges and where otherwise noted)
|
|
|
TEV/2007E EBITDA
|
|
$
|
1,262 mm
|
|
|
|
5.0x
|
|
|
|
6.0x
|
|
|
$
|
6,310
|
|
|
$
|
7,572
|
|
Plus: Control Premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
En Bloc Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,572
|
|
|
$
|
9,844
|
|
|
|
1 |
2007 estimate adjusted for Go to Market cost savings
which have been accounted for separately in the NAV analysis.
|
ii) Precedent
Transactions Methodology
In applying this valuation technique, CIBC World Markets
reviewed selected precedent North American acquisitions of
refining and marketing assets or companies that were comparable
and for which there was sufficient public information to derive
multiples. CIBC World Markets considered the differences in
asset and commodity mix, asset quality, market dynamics and
economic environment at the time of each transaction, growth
prospects and other factors inherent in the precedent
transactions identified. Nine transactions were considered
comparable for our analysis as shown in the table below.
Oil
Products Selected Precedent Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEV/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset/
|
|
Intake
|
|
|
TEV/
|
|
|
Intake
|
|
Date
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
Target
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
EBITDA1
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Mbbl/d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(C$/bbl/d)
|
|
|
Oct-06
|
|
EnCana Corp.
|
|
ConocoPhillips
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
n.a.
|
|
|
$
|
13,936
|
|
Aug-06
|
|
Western Refining
Inc.5
|
|
Giant Industries Inc.
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
5.1x
|
|
|
$
|
12,234
|
|
Aug-06
|
|
Harvest Energy
Trust2
|
|
North Atlantic Refining Ltd.
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
3.5x
|
|
|
$
|
13,880
|
|
Aug-06
|
|
Lyondell Chemical
Co.2
|
|
Citgo Petroleum Corp.
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
3.7x
|
|
|
$
|
21,533
|
|
May-06
|
|
Alon USA Inc.
|
|
Paramount Petroleum Corp.
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
4.4x
|
|
|
$
|
6,985
|
|
Apr-05
|
|
Marathon Oil
Corp.3
|
|
Ashland Inc.
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
5.2x
|
|
|
$
|
9,718
|
|
Apr-05
|
|
Valero Energy Corp.
|
|
Premcor Inc.
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
|
7.0x
|
|
|
$
|
14,447
|
|
Jan-04
|
|
Premcor Inc.
|
|
Saudi Aramco and Shell Oil
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
n.a.
|
|
|
$
|
6,480
|
|
May-03
|
|
Valero Energy
Corp.4
|
|
Orion Refining Corp.
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
4.7x
|
|
|
$
|
3,892
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8x
|
|
|
$
|
11,456
|
|
Median
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7x
|
|
|
$
|
12,234
|
|
Source: J.S. Herold Inc. and public data. Transaction value
adjusted for C$ per US$ exchange rate on the day of the
announcement; trailing EBITDA converted at average rate for
trailing 12 months.
|
|
1
|
EBITDA reflects trailing 12 months based on most recent
available quarterly data prior to the announcement of the
transaction.
|
|
2
|
Based on most recent six months EBITDA annualized.
|
|
3
|
TEV/EBITDA multiple excludes US$94 million for the chemical
business and Valvoline oil change centers.
|
|
4
|
Estimated EBITDA figure.
|
|
5
|
Transaction closing is pending.
|
Notes: Refining capacity based on crude processing capacity.
CIBC World Markets considered TEV/EBITDA and TEV/Refining Intake
Capacity to be the most appropriate multiples to evaluate the
Oil Products business unit.
In selecting the multiple ranges shown below, CIBC World Markets
gave consideration to several factors, including differences in
business mix, growth potential, age of assets, asset quality,
profitability and size between the Oil Products business unit
and the companies/assets reviewed.
A-21
The TEV/Refining Intake Capacity does not include any value for
Shell Canadas retail service stations. CIBC World Markets
reviewed 27 precedent transactions involving the acquisition of
retail service stations. The purchase price per station in these
transactions ranged from approximately $81,000 to
$5.0 million. The average purchase price, excluding the
high and low values, was $1.3 million per station. Based
upon a review of these precedent transactions and Shell
Canadas analyses of its owned stations, we have estimated
a value of between $860 million and $1.3 billion for
the retail station network. This additional value was added to
the value derived using the TEV/Refining Intake Capacity
multiple, as illustrated in the table below.
Oil
Products Precedent Transaction Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shell Canada
|
|
|
Multiple Range
|
|
|
Incremental Value of Retail Sites
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Methodology
|
|
Data
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions, except multiple ranges and where otherwise noted)
|
|
|
TEV/2006 EBITDA
|
|
|
$1,030 mm
|
|
|
|
5.5x
|
|
|
|
6.5x
|
|
|
|
Included
|
|
|
|
Included
|
|
|
$
|
5,665
|
|
|
$
|
6,695
|
|
TEV/Refining Intake Capacity
|
|
|
324,000 bbl/d
|
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
$860
|
|
|
|
$1,345
|
|
|
$
|
4,748
|
|
|
$
|
6,205
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,207
|
|
|
$
|
6,450
|
|
Summary:
NAV Approach Oil Products
In the NAV approach to the Oil Products assets, we have applied
equal weighting to both the comparable companies method and the
precedent transactions method to arrive at an estimated en
bloc value for the Oil Products business unit of
approximately $6.4 billion to $8.1 billion.
Oil
Products Value Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Value
|
|
Methodology
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Weighting
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
|
Comparable Company Analysis
|
|
$
|
7,572
|
|
|
$
|
9,844
|
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
$
|
3,786
|
|
|
$
|
4,922
|
|
Precedent Transaction Analysis
|
|
$
|
5,207
|
|
|
$
|
6,450
|
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
$
|
2,604
|
|
|
$
|
3,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
En Bloc Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,390
|
|
|
$
|
8,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Go
to Market Cost Savings
Shell Canada currently has a number of initiatives underway to
reduce costs in its Oil Products business unit which should lead
to cost savings in the future. These cost savings are expected
to result from certain joint ventures, relating to streamlining
of selected distribution channels, that have been initiated by
the Company. The Go to Market cost savings
initiative was already being implemented prior to the RDS
announcement on October 23, 2006. The value of these cost
savings is not reflected in the NAV approach value for the Oil
Products business unit and therefore we have added a value for
these costs savings. We have approached the valuation of these
cost savings in two manners: (i) DCF method; and
(ii) comparable company method.
i) DCF
Methodology
In applying this valuation technique, we calculated the present
value of the after-tax cost savings based on a financial
forecast provided by Shell Canada which assumes a growth rate of
2% per annum. Assuming a WACC of between 8.0% and 8.5%, the
present value of the Go to Market cost savings is
between $594 million and $645 million.
ii) Comparable
Companies Methodology
In applying this method, we derived a TEV to 2007E EBITDA
multiple which we estimated would reflect the en
bloc value of these savings. Assuming a multiple range of
between 6.9x and 7.9x (which we based primarily on Shell
Canadas trading multiples prior to the RDS announcement)
and 2007 Go to Market cost savings of
$55.3 million as estimated by Shell Canada, the implied
value of the Go to Market cost savings is between
$382 million and $437 million.
A-22
Summary:
NAV Approach Go to Market Cost
Savings
In the NAV approach to the Go to Market cost
savings, we have applied equal weighting to both the DCF
approach and the comparable companies method to arrive at an
estimated en bloc value for these cost savings of
approximately $488 million to $541 million.
Unallocated
Corporate Expenses
Given that our analyses of each of Shell Canadas business
units do not incorporate unallocated corporate expenses, we
adjusted our NAV approach value for these costs. We have
approached the valuation of these unallocated corporate expenses
in two manners: (i) DCF method; and (ii) comparable
companies method.
i) DCF
Methodology
In applying this valuation technique, we calculated the present
value of the after-tax unallocated corporate costs based on a
pre-tax forecast provided to us by Shell Canada. The pre-tax
unallocated corporate costs are estimated to grow from
$55.5 million in 2007 to $95.9 million in 2016. We
have assumed a terminal growth rate of 3% thereafter. Assuming a
WACC of between 8.0% and 8.5%, the present value of the
unallocated corporate expenses is between $1.0 billion and
$1.1 billion.
ii) Comparable
Companies Methodology
In applying this method, we used a TEV to 2007E EBITDA en
bloc multiple comparable to that applied for the Go
to Market cost savings. Assuming a multiple range of
between 6.9x to 7.9x and 2007 unallocated costs of
$55.5 million as estimated by Shell Canada, the estimated
value of the unallocated corporate costs is between
$383 million and $438 million.
Summary:
NAV Approach Unallocated Corporate Costs
In the NAV approach to the unallocated corporate costs, we have
applied equal weighting to both the comparable companies method
and the precedent transactions method to arrive at an estimated
en bloc value for these costs of approximately
$690 million to $765 million.
Summary
of NAV Analysis
Under the NAV approach, the value of each asset is summed to
produce a total asset value. The present value of the Go
to Market cost savings, as well as the proceeds from the
exercise of stock options and other employee stock incentive
plans are added to this value. The Companys net debt
(long-term debt plus working capital deficit) and an estimate of
the present value of corporate expenses that are not directly
assignable to each of the individual assets are deducted from
these values in order to arrive at an equity value per Common
Share. The results of the NAV analysis are summarized below and
indicate an equity value range of approximately $42 to $48 per
Common Share.
A-23
Summary
NAV Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
($ millions, except per Common Share data)
|
|
|
AOSP
|
|
$
|
20,102
|
|
|
$
|
21,777
|
|
Other Oil Sands
|
|
|
3,412
|
|
|
|
3,785
|
|
Exploration and Production
|
|
|
5,791
|
|
|
|
7,119
|
|
Oil Products
|
|
|
6,390
|
|
|
|
8,147
|
|
Go to Market Cost
Savings
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
541
|
|
Frontier and Undeveloped Land
|
|
|
1,476
|
|
|
|
1,809
|
|
Unallocated Corporate G&A
|
|
|
(690
|
)
|
|
|
(765
|
)
|
Option
Proceeds1
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value
|
|
$
|
37,489
|
|
|
$
|
42,933
|
|
Less: Net Debt (December 31,
2006)
|
|
|
(1,911
|
)
|
|
|
(1,911
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Value
|
|
$
|
35,578
|
|
|
$
|
41,022
|
|
Shares Outstanding (fully-diluted)
|
|
|
847.0
|
|
|
|
847.0
|
|
Equity Value per Common
Share
|
|
$
|
42.00
|
|
|
$
|
48.43
|
|
|
|
1 |
Source: Shell Canada option schedule.
|
Distinctive
Material Benefits to RDS
The value of certain synergies is reflected in some of the
valuation methodologies utilized. CIBC World Markets also
considered whether any distinctive material benefits that are
unique to RDS would accrue from its acquisition of all the
Common Shares. Possible benefits or cost savings might accrue to
RDS with respect to the following areas: i) the
consolidation of the human resources and infrastructure required
for the development of the SURE Northern Energy oil sands leases
owned by RDS and the accelerated development thereof, ii) the
integration of Shell Canadas oil sands business with the
RDS downstream businesses in the United States, iii) the
elimination of certain general and administrative functions, and
iv) the opportunity to utilize consolidated tax planning
strategies. CIBC World Markets did not have sufficient financial
information or analysis from RDS to quantify such benefits but
we believe they could be material in the aggregate.
Valuation
Conclusion
In arriving at an opinion of fair market value of Shell
Canadas Common Shares, CIBC World Markets has not
attributed any particular weight to any specific factor but has
made qualitative judgements based on experience in rendering
such opinions and on circumstances then prevailing as to the
significance and relevance of each factor. CIBC World
Markets did, however, weight each valuation approach differently
and ascribed the greatest amount of importance to the DCF
approach.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing and such other factors
as we considered relevant, CIBC World Markets is of the opinion
that, as of the date hereof, the fair market value is in the
range of $42 to $48 per Common Share.
Yours very truly,
A-24
SCHEDULE
B
INFORMATION
REGARDING THE DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
OF SHELL
INVESTMENTS LIMITED AND ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC
The following is a list of the executive officers and directors
of Shell Investments Limited and Royal Dutch Shell plc setting
forth, for each person, the name, citizenship, business address,
present principal occupation or employment and the name,
principal business and address of any corporation or other
organization in which such employment is conducted and the
five-year employment history of such person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Principal Occupation
|
|
|
Name, Citizenship, Positions at Filing Companies
|
|
or Employment*
|
|
Five Year Employment History
|
|
Jorma Ollila
Republic of Finland
Non-Executive Chairman of Royal Dutch Shell plc
|
|
Non-Executive Chairman of the
Board of Directors of Nokia Corporation, a telecommunications
and mobile devices manufacturing company that has its principal
business address at Keilalahdentie
2-4, 02150
Espoo, Finland, P.O. Box 226, Fin-00045 Nokia Group, Finland.
|
|
He was appointed Non-Executive
Chairman of Royal Dutch Shell plc from June 2006. Previously he
was Vice-President of International Operations of Nokia in 1985.
In 1986 he was appointed Vice President Finance of Nokia and
served between 1990 and 1992 as President of Nokia Mobile
Phones. Between 1992 and 1999 he was President and Chief
Executive Officer of Nokia and from 1999 to 1 June 2006 he
was Chief Executive Officer of Nokia. Prior to joining Nokia, he
started his career in banking at Citibank in London and
Helsinki. Currently he is Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of
Nokia and a Non-executive Director of Ford Motor Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lord Kerr of Kinlochard
United Kingdom
Deputy Chairman and Senior Independent Non-Executive Director of
Royal Dutch Shell plc
|
|
Deputy Chairman of the Board of
Directors and Senior Independent Non-Executive Director of Royal
Dutch Shell plc
|
|
He was a Non-Executive Director of
Shell Transport from 2002 to 2005 and has been Deputy Chairman
and Senior Independent Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch
Shell plc since 2004. Previously, he served in various positions
in the UK Diplomatic Service from 1966 to 2002, including as UK
Permanent Representative to the European Union, British
Ambassador to the U.S., Foreign Office, Permanent Under
Secretary of State and Head of the UK Diplomatic Service. On
leaving government service he was appointed Secretary-General of
the European Convention from 2002 to 2003. A member of the House
of Lords since 2004 and Chairman of the Court and Council of
Imperial College, London, he has been a trustee and Deputy
Chairman of the National Gallery since 2002 and a trustee of the
Rhodes Trust since 1997. He has been a non-executive Director of
Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited (both engaged in finding,
mining and processing mineral resources) since 2003 and Scottish
American Investment Company plc, an investment company, since
2002.
|
B-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Principal Occupation
|
|
|
Name, Citizenship, Positions at Filing Companies
|
|
or Employment*
|
|
Five Year Employment History
|
|
Jeroen van der Veer
The Netherlands
Chief Executive of Royal Dutch Shell plc
|
|
Chief Executive of Royal Dutch
Shell plc
|
|
He was appointed President
(currently Chief Executive) of Royal Dutch in 2000, having been
a Managing Director since 1997. He was appointed Chairman of the
Committee of Managing Directors of the Shell Group in March 2004
and Chief Executive of Royal Dutch Shell in 2004. He has also
been a Non-Executive Director of Unilever (which includes
Unilever N.V., Unilever plc and Unilever Holdings Ltd and
engages in the worldwide manufacture and supply of consumer
goods) since 2002. He was a member of the supervisory board of
De Nederlandsche Bank N.V. (The Netherlands central bank) from
2000 to 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Voser
Switzerland
Chief Financial Officer of Royal Dutch Shell plc
|
|
Chief Financial Officer of Royal
Dutch Shell plc
|
|
He was employed from 1982 to March
2002 by the Shell Group in a variety of finance and business
roles in Switzerland, the UK, Argentina and Chile, including
Group Chief Internal Auditor of the Shell Group, Chief Financial
Officer of Shell Europe Oil Products and Chief Financial Officer
of Shell International Oil Products. He was appointed Managing
Director of Shell Transport, a Group Managing Director and Chief
Financial Officer and an Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell
with effect from October 2004. From March 2002 until September
2004, he was Chief Finance Officer and Member of the Group
executive committee of the Asea Brown Boveri group of companies,
based in Switzerland and engaged in the energy and automation
business areas. He was a member of the supervisory board of
Aegon N.V., which is engaged in the insurance business, between
2004 and 2006. He is currently member of UBS AG, a financial
service firm, since 2005 and was a member of the Swiss-American
Chamber of Commerce in 2003-2004. Since 2006 he has been a
member of the Swiss Federal Auditor Oversight Authority, a
public institution supervising the External Audit firms
operating in Switzerland.
|
B-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Principal Occupation
|
|
|
Name, Citizenship, Positions at Filing Companies
|
|
or Employment*
|
|
Five Year Employment History
|
|
Malcolm Brinded
United Kingdom
Executive Director, Exploration and Production of Royal Dutch
Shell plc
|
|
Executive Director, Exploration
and Production of Royal Dutch Shell plc
|
|
He joined the Shell Group in 1974
and has held various positions around the world. He was Country
Chair for the Shell Group in the UK from 1999 to 2002 and
Director of Planning, Environment and External Affairs at Shell
International Ltd. from 2001 to 2002. He was a Managing Director
of Royal Dutch from 2002 to 2005. In March 2004, he was
appointed a Director and Managing Director of Shell Transport
and became Vice-Chairman of the Committee of Managing Directors
and in 2004 became an Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell.
He co-chaired the UK Industry Leadership Team from 1998 to 2001,
covering all UK upstream industry operators, contractors and
suppliers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linda Cook
United States
Executive Director, Gas & Power of Royal Dutch
Shell plc
|
|
Executive Director, Gas &
Power of Royal Dutch Shell plc
|
|
She was Chief Executive Officer
for Shell Gas & Power from 2000 to 2003. She was President
and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of
Directors of Shell Canada Limited from 2003 to 2004. In August
2004, she was appointed a Managing Director (currently Executive
Director) of Royal Dutch and became a Group Managing Director
and Chief Executive Officer of Shell Gas & Power. In 2004
she became an Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell. She has
been non-executive Director of The Boeing Company, an aerospace
company, since 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rob Routs
The Netherlands
Executive Director, Oil Products and Chemicals of Royal Dutch
Shell plc
Non-Executive director of Shell Canada
|
|
Executive Director, Oil Products
and Chemicals of Royal Dutch Shell plc
|
|
He joined the Shell Group in 1971
and has held various positions in The Netherlands, Canada and
the United States. He was President and Chief Executive Officer
of Shell Oil Products U.S.A. and President of Shell Oil Company
and Country Chair for the Shell Group in the United States from
2002 to 2003. He was a Managing Director of Royal Dutch from
2003 to 2005 and became a Group Managing Director with effect
from July 2003 and an Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell
since 2004. He was Chief Executive Officer of Equilon Enterprise
LLC (a joint venture between Shell and Texaco) from 2000 to
2002. He is also a director of INSEAD (a worldwide business
school). He has been a board member of Shell Canada since 2005.
|
B-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Principal Occupation
|
|
|
Name, Citizenship, Positions at Filing Companies
|
|
or Employment*
|
|
Five Year Employment History
|
|
Maarten van den Bergh
The Netherlands
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell plc
|
|
Non-Executive Director of Royal
Dutch Shell plc
|
|
He was President of Royal Dutch
from 1998 to 2000 having been a Managing Director of Royal Dutch
since 1992. He was a member of the Royal Dutch supervisory board
from 2000 to 2005 and became a Non-Executive Director of Royal
Dutch Shell in 2004. He was Chairman of the Board of Directors
of Lloyds TSB Group plc from 2001 to 2006. He has been a
Non-Executive director of BT Group plc, a telecommunications
company, since 2000, British Airways plc, an international
airline, since 2002 and a member of the supervisory board of
Akzo Nobel N.V., which manufactures paint, chemicals, salt and
healthcare products, since 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Land
United Kingdom
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell plc
|
|
Non-Executive Director of Royal
Dutch Shell plc
|
|
He was appointed a Non-Executive
Director of Royal Dutch Shell plc as from July 2006. He
qualified as an accountant in 1970 and was a partner of
Ernst & Young LLP from 1978 until June 2006. He
was Chairman of Ernst & Young LLP and a member of
the Global Executive Board of Ernst & Young
Global LLP from 1995 until June 2006. He is a Non-Executive
Director of BBA Aviation plc and Ashmore Group plc, a
member of the Advisory Board of the Judge Business School and
the Finance and Audit Committees of the National Gallery. In
December 2006 he was appointed a Non-Executive Director of
Vodafone Group PLC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mary R. (Nina) Henderson
United States
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell plc
|
|
Non-Executive Director of Royal
Dutch Shell plc
|
|
She was a Non-Executive Director
of Shell Transport from 2001 to 2005 and became a Non-Executive
Director of Royal Dutch Shell in 2004. She was a director of the
Hunt Corporation, engaged in the manufacture and distribution of
office and art/framing supplies, from 1991 to 2002. She has been
a Director of Pactiv Corporation, a producer of specialty
packaging products, since 2000, AXA Financial Inc., a provider
of diversified financial services, since 1996, Del Monte Foods
Company, a manufacturer and marketer of processed foods, since
2002 and Visiting Nurse Service of New York, a healthcare
service provider, since 1997.
|
B-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Principal Occupation
|
|
|
Name, Citizenship, Positions at Filing Companies
|
|
or Employment*
|
|
Five Year Employment History
|
|
Sir Peter Job
United Kingdom
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell plc
|
|
Non-Executive Director of Royal
Dutch Shell plc
|
|
He was a Non-Executive Director of
Shell Transport from 2001 to 2005 and became a Non-Executive
Director of Royal Dutch Shell in 2004. He was Chief Executive of
Reuters Group plc, a provider of news services, from 1991 to
2001, a member of the supervisory board of Bertelsmann AG, a
publishing and communications company, from 2002 to 2005,
non-executive director of GlaxoSmithKline plc, a pharmaceuticals
company, from 2000 to 2004, and a non-executive director
Multex.com Inc., a provider of global financial information,
from 2002 to 2003. He has been a non-executive director of
Schroders plc, a global asset management company, since 1999,
TIBCO Software Inc, a software company, since 2000, Instinet
Group Inc, an provider of electronic trading solutions, since
2000 and a member of the supervisory board of Deutsche Bank AG,
a provider of banking and financial services, since 2001.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wim Kok
The Netherlands
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell plc
|
|
Non-Executive Director of Royal
Dutch Shell plc
|
|
He was a member of the Royal Dutch
supervisory board from 2003 to 2005. He was appointed Dutch
Prime Minister in 1994, serving for two periods of government up
to July 2002. Since 2003 he has been a member of the supervisory
boards of ING Groep N.V., a financial services company, KLM
N.V., an international airline, and TNT N.V. (formerly TPG
N.V.), a global provider of mail, express and logistics services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonkheer Aarnout Loudon
The Netherlands
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell plc
|
|
Non-Executive Director of Royal
Dutch Shell plc
|
|
He was appointed a Non-executive
Director of Royal Dutch Shell in October 2004. He was a member
of the Royal Dutch supervisory board from 1997 and was a Board
member of Royal Dutch until the merger of the company on
December 21, 2005. He was a member of the Board of
Management of Akzo from 1977 to 1994 (Akzo Nobel as from
1994) and its Chairman from 1982 to 1994. He is former
Chairman of the supervisory boards of ABN AMRO Holding N.V. and
Akzo Nobel N.V., a member of the International Advisory Board of
Allianz AG and a member of the European Advisory Board of Lehman
Brothers Europe Ltd.
|
B-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Principal Occupation
|
|
|
Name, Citizenship, Positions at Filing Companies
|
|
or Employment*
|
|
Five Year Employment History
|
|
Christine Morin-Postel
France
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell plc
|
|
Non-Executive Director of Royal
Dutch Shell plc
|
|
She was appointed a member of the
Royal Dutch supervisory board (currently a Non-Executive
Director) in 2004 and a Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch
Shell in 2004. From 1998 until March 2001, she was Chief
Executive and Chairman of the Management Committee of
Société Générale de Belgique, an
international and industrial services group. She was Executive
Vice-President and a member of the Executive Committee of Suez
S.A., an international and industrial services group, from 2000
to 2003. She was a non-executive director of Arlington Capital
Investors Europe, an investment management company, from 2002 to
2005 and Fortis S.A./N.V., an international financial services
company, from 1998 to 2003. She has been a non-executive
director of Alcan Inc., a manufacturer of aluminum, light gauge
sheet, foil and packaging products, since 2003, Pilkington plc,
a manufacturer of glass and glazing products, since 2003 and 3i
Group plc, which is engaged in private equity and venture
capital, since 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lawrence Ricciardi
United States
Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell plc
|
|
Non-Executive Director of Royal
Dutch Shell plc
|
|
He was appointed a member of the
Royal Dutch supervisory board (currently a Non-Executive
Director) in 2001 and a Non-Executive Director of Royal Dutch
Shell in 2004. He was previously Senior Vice President and
General Counsel of IBM, which creates, develops and manufactures
advanced information technologies, from 1995 to 2002. He was
Senior Advisor to the law firm Jones Day and to Lazard Freres
& Co. from 2003 to 2006 and a member of the Board of
Directors of The Readers Digest Association, Inc., which
is engaged in publishing and direct marketing, since 1998, the
Morgan Library, a library and museum, since 2003 and the Andrew
W. Mellon Foundation, a charitable foundation, since 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beat Hess
Switzerland
Group Legal Director of Royal Dutch Shell plc
|
|
Group Legal Director of Royal
Dutch Shell plc
|
|
He was appointed as Legal Director
in June 2003. Previously he was General Counsel of Asea Brown
Boveri group of companies from 1988 to 2003. He is also a
Non-Executive board member of Ciba Specialty Chemicals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roxanne J. Decyk
United States
Corporate Affairs Director
of Royal Dutch Shell plc
|
|
Corporate Affairs Director of
Royal Dutch Shell plc
|
|
Previously, she was Senior Vice
President for Corporate Affairs/Human Resources for Shell Oil
and Vice President of Corporate Strategy. She is also a
Non-Executive board member of Snap-On Inc.
|
B-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Principal Occupation
|
|
|
Name, Citizenship, Positions at Filing Companies
|
|
or Employment*
|
|
Five Year Employment History
|
|
Alan D. Matula
United States
Chief Information Officer of Royal Dutch Shell plc
|
|
Chief Information Officer of Royal
Dutch Shell plc
|
|
Previously, he was General Manager
Strategy and Projects & Solutions for Shell
International B.V. He is a Non-Executive board member of
Airbiquity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hugh S. Mitchell
United Kingdom
Human Resource Director
of Royal Dutch Shell plc
|
|
Human Resource Director of Royal
Dutch Shell plc
|
|
Previously he was Director
International for Royal Dutch Shell Group and Human Resource
Director for Royal Dutch Shells Global Oil Products
business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Adrian Loader
United Kingdom
Chairman and Director of Shell Investments Limited
|
|
Director, Strategy and Business
Development of Royal Dutch Shell plc
|
|
He has had an extensive career in
the Shell Group that has seen him most recently as Director of
Strategic Planning, Sustainable Development and External Affairs
for the Royal Dutch Shell Group of companies. Mr. Loader
was a director of Shell Canada from September 2003 until May
2005.
His previous posts have included President of Shell Oil Products
Europe, Director for Shell Oil Products East Zone, Director for
Shell Oil Products South Zone, Head of Central and Eastern
Europe and the Former Soviet Union, Chief Executive of the Shell
companies in the Philippines, General Manager in both Uruguay
and Honduras, as well as being assigned to compania Shell de
Venezuela and the Shell Companies in Malaysia. He has been a
Non-Executive Director of Alliance Boots plc (previously
Alliance Unichem plc), which is engaged in pharmaceutical
and wholesale distribution of medicines since 2003. He has also
been a Non-Executive Director of Holcim Ltd., which is engaged
in the cement and aggregates business since 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew W. Longden
United Kingdom
Director of Shell Investments Limited
|
|
Executive Vice
President Treasury and Corporate Finance, Royal
Dutch Shell plc. Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA,
United Kingdom
|
|
He was appointed Executive Vice
President Treasury and Corporate Finance of Royal
Dutch Shell on November 1, 2003, prior to which he was
Group Treasurer of BT Group plc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
James H. Mair
United Kingdom
Director of Shell Investments Limited
|
|
Vice President Business
Development Upstream Shell International B.V., Oil
and Gas, Carel van Bylandtlaan 30, 2501 AN The Hague, The
Netherlands
|
|
He has been the Vice President
Business Development Upstream at Shell International
B.V. since May 1, 2006. He was previously the Vice
President Acquisitions & Divestments of Shell International
Exploration and Production B.V.
|
B-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Principal Occupation
|
|
|
Name, Citizenship, Positions at Filing Companies
|
|
or Employment*
|
|
Five Year Employment History
|
|
Arnold MacBurnie
Canada
Director and Chief
Executive Officer of Shell Investments Limited
|
|
Senior Vice President of Coral
Energy Canada Inc. Suite 3500, 450
1st
Street S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 5H1
|
|
Employed by Coral Energy Canada
Inc. from January 1, 1997 to present. Has been Senior Vice
President for the past five years, responsible for origination
(regulatory, producer relations, marketing and business
development) in Canada until mid-2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mieke Findlay
Canada
Chief Financial Officer of Shell Investments Limited
|
|
Finance Manager, Coral Energy
Canada Inc., Suite 3500, 450
1st
Street S.W., Calgary, Alberta T2P 5H1
|
|
She was appointed Finance Manager,
Coral Energy Canada Inc. in January 2004, prior to which she was
Manager, Risk Control for Coral Energy Canada Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Hall
Canada
Director of Shell Investments Limited
|
|
Head of Legal
(Chemicals Canada) and Corporate Secretary, Shell
Chemicals Canada Ltd. and Shell Chemicals Americas Inc.
3200, 400
4th
Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
T2P 0J4
|
|
He joined the Shell Group on
January 1, 2006. He previously carried on a law practice in
Calgary, Alberta which included (since May 2002) acting
for Shell Chemicals Canada Ltd. (engaged in manufacturing,
marketing and transporting chemical products). From December
1996 to June 2002 he acted for and was employed by Zi
Corporation (a public company engaged in interface solutions for
wireless and consumer technologies).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derric Ostapyk
Canada
Director of Shell Investments Limited
|
|
Vice President, Shell Chemicals
Canada Ltd. and Shell Chemicals Americas Inc.
3200, 400
4th
Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
T2P 0J4
|
|
He joined Shell Chemicals Canada
Ltd. in 1977 and has held various positions in Canada. He was
Manager, Business Integration Shell Chemicals Canada Ltd. from
1999 until October 1, 2006.
|
|
|
*
|
Unless otherwise indicated, the
business address of each of the above persons is Royal Dutch
Shell, Carel van Bylandtlaan 30, 2596 HR The Hague, The
Netherlands.
|
B-8
SCHEDULE
C
INFORMATION
REGARDING THE DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
OF SHELL
CANADA LIMITED
The following is a list of the directors and executive officers
of Shell Canada Limited setting forth, for each person, the
name, citizenship, business address, present principal
occupation or employment and the name, principal business and
address of any corporation or other organization in which such
employment is conducted and the five-year employment history of
such person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Principal Occupation
|
|
|
Name, Citizenship, Position at Shell Canada Limited
|
|
or Employment*
|
|
Five Year Employment History
|
|
Derek H. Burney, O.C.
Canada
Lead Director
Shell Canada Limited
|
|
Senior Strategic Advisor
Ogilvy Renault LLP
1500 45 OConnor Street
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1P 1A4
|
|
Since 2006, Mr. Burney has
been the Chairman of CanWest Global Communications Corp., an
international media company with interests in broadcast
television, publications, radio, specialty cable channels,
out-of-home
advertising and interactive operations in Canada, Australia,
New Zealand, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Turkey, the
United Kingdom and the United States. Also in 2006,
Mr. Burney was appointed as Senior Strategic Advisor to
Ogilvy Renault LLP, a full service law firm with offices in
Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal and London, United Kingdom.
Mr. Burney assists clients in dealing with cross-border and
domestic issues as well as trade and investment policy matters.
Since 2004, Mr. Burney has been the Chairman of New
Brunswick Power Corporation, a Crown Corporation with the
legislated mission to provide for the electricity needs of the
Province of New Brunswick. New Brunswick Power Corporation is
the largest electric utility in Atlantic Canada. From 1999 to
2004 Mr. Burney served as President and Chief Executive
Officer of CAE Inc., the worlds premier provider of
simulation and control technologies for training and
optimization solutions for the aerospace and defense sectors. He
is Chairman of the Confederation College Foundation, a Fellow at
the Canadian Defence and Foreign Affairs Institute and a
Visiting Professor and Senior Distinguished Fellow of Carleton
University. Mr. Burney also serves as a director of
TransCanada Corporation and TransCanada Pipelines Limited.
|
C-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Principal Occupation
|
|
|
Name, Citizenship, Position at Shell Canada Limited
|
|
or Employment*
|
|
Five Year Employment History
|
|
Louise Fréchette, O.C.
Canada
Director
Shell Canada Limited
|
|
Company Director
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
|
|
Ms. Fréchette most
recently served as Deputy Secretary-General of the United
Nations from 1998 to 2006. From 1995 until 1998, she was Deputy
Minister of the Canadian Federal Department of Defence. Prior to
1995, Ms. Fréchette held a succession of senior
positions in the federal government, including Associate Deputy
Minister of the Department of Finance, Ambassador and Permanent
Representative of Canada to the United Nations, Assistant Deputy
Minister positions with the Department of Foreign Affairs and
International Trade, and Canadas Ambassador to Argentine
and Uruguay. Ms. Fréchette is also a Distinguished
Fellow of the Centre for International Governance Innovation in
Waterloo, Ontario.
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Galloway
Canada
Director
Shell Canada Limited
|
|
Chairman of the
Bank of Montreal
First Canadian Place
21st
Floor,
100 King Street West
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
M5X 1A1
|
|
Mr. Galloway is currently
Chairman of the Board of the Bank of Montreal and was President
and Chief Executive Officer of Torstar from 1988 until his
retirement. He joined Torstar in 1981 as Director of Corporate
Development. Torstar is a major newspaper and book publishing
company. It publishes, among other newspapers, the Toronto Star,
which is Canadas largest daily newspaper. The book
publishing segment of the company consists of Harlequin
Enterprises Limited, best known for publishing romance fiction
worldwide. Before his appointment in 1982 as President and Chief
Executive Officer for Harlequin, Mr. Galloway was a
founding partner of the Canada Consulting Group, a leading
strategic management consulting firm, which was acquired by
Boston Consulting Group in 1992. He began his career with
General Foods. Mr. Galloway also serves as a director of
Abitibi Consolidated, The E.W. Scripps Company and Toromont
Industries Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ida J. Goodreau
Canada
Director
Shell Canada Limited
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer
Vancouver Coastal Health Authority
11th
Floor,
601 West Broadway
Vancouver,
British Columbia,
Canada V5Z 4C2
|
|
Ms. Goodreau has been
President and Chief Executive Officer of Vancouver Coastal
Health Authority since 2002. The Vancouver Coastal Health
Authority shares responsibility with five other geographical
health authorities and ministries of the British Columbia
provincial government for planning, delivering, monitoring and
evaluating health care programs in the province. From 2000 to
2002, Ms. Goodreau was Senior Vice-President of Global
Optimization & Human Resources, Norske Skog Industries.
Ms. Goodreau also served as a director of Terasen Inc. from
November, 2002 to December, 2005.
|
C-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Principal Occupation
|
|
|
Name, Citizenship, Position at Shell Canada Limited
|
|
or Employment*
|
|
Five Year Employment History
|
|
Kerry L. Hawkins
Canada
Director
Shell Canada Limited
|
|
Company Director
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
|
|
Mr. Hawkins was President of
Cargill Limited from 1982 until his retirement at the end of
November, 2005. Cargill Limited is a Canadian agricultural, food
and processing company. Mr. Hawkins also serves as a
director of TransCanada Pipelines Limited, TransCanada
Corporation and Nova Chemicals Corporation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
David W. Kerr
Canada
Director
Shell Canada Limited
|
|
Company Director
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
|
Mr. Kerr has served as a
director of Brookfield Asset Management Inc. since May 1987.
Until its acquisition by Xstrata in November, 2006,
Mr. Kerr was the Chairman and a director of Falconbridge
Limited (formerly Noranda Inc.). Falconbridge Limited was a
leading international mining and metals company and was one of
the worlds largest producers of zinc and nickel and a
significant producer of copper, primary and fabricated aluminum,
lead, silver, gold, sulphuric acid and cobalt. Mr. Kerr was
the Chairman and a director of Noranda Inc. from 2002 to 2006,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 2001 to 2002 and
President and Chief Executive Officer from 1990 to 2001.
Mr. Kerr also serves as a director Sun Life Financial Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clive Mather
United Kingdom
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Shell Canada Limited
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer
Shell Canada Limited
|
|
Mr. Mather has served as
President and Chief Executive Officer of Shell Canada Limited
since August, 2004. From 2002 to 2004, Mr. Mather served as
Chairman of Shell UK Limited and Head of Global Learning of
Shell International Limited. From 2001 to 2002, Mr. Mather
served as Special Advisor to the Chairman of the Committee of
Managing Directors of Shell International Limited. From 1999 to
2001, Mr. Mather served as Chief Executive Officer of Shell
Services International Ltd. Prior to this, Mr. Mather
served as Director, International of Shell International
Limited. Mr. Mather is also currently a director of Shell
Chemicals Canada Ltd., Shell Canada Products Limited and Shell
Canada OP Inc. Mr. Mather served on the Board of Directors
of Placer Dome Inc. from April, 2005 to January, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marvin E. Odum
United States
Director
Shell Canada Limited
|
|
Executive Vice President
Americas Shell Exploration and Production
c/o Shell Energy Resources Company 200 North Dairy Ashford
Houston, Texas 77079
|
|
Mr. Odum has been Executive
Vice President Americas for Shell Exploration and
Production since May, 2005. Prior to that, from May, 2003 to
May, 2005, Mr. Odum was Chief Executive Officer of
InterGen, a global power generation company active in 13
countries. Mr. Odum was Shell Gas and Power Director for
the Americas, based in London from 2001 to 2003.
|
C-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Principal Occupation
|
|
|
Name, Citizenship, Position at Shell Canada Limited
|
|
or Employment*
|
|
Five Year Employment History
|
|
Ronald W. Osborne
Canada
Director
Shell Canada Limited
|
|
Company Director
Toronto, Ontario
|
|
Since May, 2005, Mr. Osborne
has been Chairman of the Board of Sun Life Financial Inc. and
its wholly owned subsidiary, Sun Life Assurance Company of
Canada. From 1999 to 2003, Mr. Osborne was President and
Chief Executive Officer of Ontario Power Generation Inc. which
owns the power generation assets supplying approximately 85 per
cent of all electricity consumed in Ontario. Mr. Osborne is
also a director of Torstar Corporation, St. Lawrence Cement
Group Inc., Massachusetts Financial Services Company and Four
Seasons Hotel Inc., and is a trustee of RioCan Real Estate
Investment Trust. Mr. Osborne also served as a director of
Air Canada from 1999 to 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rob J. Routs
The Netherlands
Chairman of the
Meetings of the Board
Shell Canada Limited
|
|
Executive Director
Royal Dutch Shell plc
c/o Shell International Limited Shell Centre
London SE1 7NA
United Kingdom
|
|
Mr. Routs is currently an
Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell plc and was previously a
Managing Director of the Royal Dutch/Shell Group since 2003.
From 2002 to 2003, Mr. Routs served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Shell Oil Products U.S., President of Shell
Oil Company and Country Chair for the Shell Group in the United
States. From 2000 to 2002, Mr. Routs served as President
and Chief Executive Officer of Equilon Enterprises LLC. Prior to
that, Mr. Routs was Head of Shell International Resource
and Technology Services Group (Shell Global Solutions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond Royer, O.C.
Canada
Director
Shell Canada Limited
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer
Domtar Inc.
395 de Maisonneuve Blvd West
Montreal, Québec, Canada H3A 1L6
|
|
Mr. Royer has been President
and Chief Executive Officer of Domtar Inc. since 1996. Domtar
Inc. is a North American manufacturer of fine papers, pulp and
forest products. Mr. Royer also serves as a director of
Domtar Inc. and Power Financial Corporation.
|
C-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Principal Occupation
|
|
|
Name, Citizenship, Position at Shell Canada Limited
|
|
or Employment*
|
|
Five Year Employment History
|
|
Nancy Southern
Canada
Director
Shell Canada Limited
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer
ATCO Ltd. and
Canadian Utilities Limited
1600, 909 11th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2R 1N6
|
|
Ms. Southern has been
President and Chief Executive Officer of ATCO Ltd. and Canadian
Utilities Limited since January, 2003. Ms. Southern was
Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ATCO Ltd. and
Canadian Utilities Limited from 2000 to December, 2002. ATCO
Ltd. is a management holding company with operating subsidiaries
engaged in regulated natural gas and electric operations, power
generation, manufacturing, sale and leasing of relocatable
workforce shelter products and other businesses. Canadian
Utilities Limited is a holding company with operating
subsidiaries engaged in natural gas and electrical energy
utility operations and in related non-regulated operations.
Ms. Southern also serves as a director and Chief Executive
Officer of certain other subsidiaries of ATCO Ltd. and Canadian
Utilities Limited. Ms. Southern is a director of the Bank
of Montreal and Akita Drilling Ltd. and is Executive Vice
President of Spruce Meadows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cathy L. Williams
Canada
Chief Financial Officer
Shell Canada Limited
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
Shell Canada Limited
|
|
For the past five years,
Ms. Williams has been actively engaged in executive or
employee capacities with Shell Canada Limited or affiliates of
Royal Dutch Shell plc. Ms. Williams was appointed
Chief Financial Officer of Shell Canada Limited effective
April 1, 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
David C. Aldous
United States
Senior Vice President,
Oil Products
Shell Canada Limited
|
|
Senior Vice President,
Oil Products
Shell Canada Limited
|
|
For the past five years,
Mr. Aldous has been actively engaged in executive
capacities with Shell Canada Limited or affiliates of Royal
Dutch Shell plc. Mr. Aldous was appointed Senior Vice
President, Oil Products of Shell Canada Limited effective
October 1, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Ian Kilgour
Canada/United
Kingdom
Senior Vice President,
Exploration & Production Shell Canada Limited
|
|
Senior Vice President,
Exploration & Production
Shell Canada Limited
|
|
For the past five years,
Mr. Kilgour has been actively engaged in executive or
employee capacities with Shell Canada Limited or its affiliates.
Mr. Kilgour was appointed Senior Vice President,
Exploration & Production of Shell Canada Limited
effective July 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian E. Straub
Canada
Senior Vice President,
Oil Sands
Shell Canada Limited
|
|
Senior Vice President,
Oil Sands
Shell Canada Limited
|
|
For the past five years,
Mr. Straub has been actively engaged in executive or
employee capacities with Shell Canada Limited or affiliates of
Royal Dutch Shell plc. Mr. Straub was appointed Senior
Vice President, Oil Sands of Shell Canada Limited effective
October 1, 2005.
|
|
|
*
|
Unless otherwise indicated, the
business address of the above persons is Shell Canada Limited,
400
4th
Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 2H5.
|
C-5
The
Depositary for the Offer is:
CIBC MELLON TRUST COMPANY
|
|
|
For Delivery by Mail:
P.O. Box 1036
Adelaide Street Postal Station
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
M5C 2K4
|
|
For Delivery by Courier or by Hand: 199 Bay Street Commerce Court West Securities Level Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5L 1G9
or
600 The Dome Tower 333-7th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 2Z1
|
For Information call:
Telephone:
(416) 643-5500
Toll Free:
(800) 387-0825
E-mail:
inquiries@cibcmellon.com
The Information Agent for the Offer is:
The Exchange Tower
130 King Street West, Suite 2950
P.O. Box 361, Toronto, Ontario
Shareholders Call Toll Free:
(866) 851-4179
(English and French)
Banks and Brokers Call Collect:
(416) 867-2272
Email: contactus@kingsdaleshareholder.com
The Dealer Managers for the Offer are:
|
|
|
MORGAN STANLEY CANADA
LIMITED
|
|
SCOTIA CAPITAL INC.
|
|
|
|
Suite 3700, 181 Bay Street
Toronto, Ontario
M5J 2T3
|
|
Suite 1800, Scotia Centre
700 2nd Street S.W.
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 2W1
|
|
|
|
Telephone:
(416) 943-8400
Facsimile:
(416) 943-8320
|
|
Telephone:
(403) 213-7777
Facsimile:
(403) 298-4099
|
|
|
|
For further
information contact:
Matthew Hind
|
|
For further
information contact:
David Baboneau
|
exv99wxayx1yxby
THE INSTRUCTIONS ACCOMPANYING THIS LETTER OF
TRANSMITTAL SHOULD BE READ CAREFULLY BEFORE THIS LETTER OF
TRANSMITTAL IS COMPLETED. THIS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL IS FOR USE
IN ACCEPTING THE OFFER BY SHELL INVESTMENTS LIMITED TO PURCHASE
ALL OF THE OUTSTANDING COMMON SHARES (INCLUDING ALL COMMON
SHARES WHICH MAY BECOME OUTSTANDING ON OR AFTER THE DATE OF
THE OFFER AND PRIOR TO THE EXPIRY TIME (AS DEFINED BELOW)) OF
SHELL CANADA LIMITED NOT ALREADY HELD BY SHELL INVESTMENTS
LIMITED OR ITS AFFILIATES.
LETTER
OF TRANSMITTAL
for
Deposits of Common Shares of
SHELL
CANADA LIMITED
pursuant
to the Offer dated February 8, 2007 made by
SHELL
INVESTMENTS LIMITED
a
wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of
ROYAL
DUTCH SHELL plc
THE OFFER IS OPEN FOR
ACCEPTANCE UNTIL 8:00 P.M. (TORONTO TIME)
ON MARCH 16, 2007, UNLESS EXTENDED OR WITHDRAWN (THE
EXPIRY TIME).
SEE TIME FOR ACCEPTANCE IN SECTION 2 OF THE
OFFER.
USE THIS LETTER OF
TRANSMITTAL IF:
|
|
1.
|
YOU ARE DEPOSITING COMMON SHARE CERTIFICATE(S); OR
|
|
2.
|
YOU ARE A U.S. HOLDER FOLLOWING PROCEDURES FOR
BOOK-ENTRY CONFIRMATION AND DO NOT HAVE AN AGENTS MESSAGE;
OR
|
|
3.
|
YOU PREVIOUSLY DEPOSITED COMMON SHARES PURSUANT TO A
NOTICE OF GUARANTEED DELIVERY.
|
This Letter of Transmittal or a manually executed facsimile copy
thereof, properly completed and duly executed in accordance with
the instructions set out herein, together with all other
required documents, must accompany the certificates representing
the common shares (the Common Shares) of Shell
Canada Limited (Shell Canada) deposited pursuant to
the offer (as it may be amended from time to time, the
Offer) dated February 8, 2007 made by Shell
Investments Limited (the Offeror), a wholly-owned
indirect subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell plc, to holders of
Common Shares, other than the Offeror or its affiliates
(Shareholders).
Shareholders may also accept the Offer by following the
procedures for book-entry transfer set forth in Section 3
of the Offer, Manner of Acceptance Acceptance
by Book-Entry Transfer, provided that the confirmation of
a book-entry
transfer of Common Shares into the Depositarys account at
The Canadian Depository for Securities Limited (CDS)
or The Depository Trust Company (DTC), together with
an Agents Message in respect thereof, or a properly
completed Letter of Transmittal and
any other required documents are received by the Depositary, if
sent by mail, at its office in Toronto, Ontario, Canada or, if
sent by registered mail, hand or courier, at either its office
in Toronto, Ontario or Calgary, Alberta, Canada, prior to the
Expiry Time.
Shareholders whose certificates are not immediately available or
who are unable to deliver their certificates and all other
required documents to the Depositary at or prior to the Expiry
Time may deposit such Common Shares according to the procedure
for guaranteed delivery set forth in Section 3 of the
Offer, Manner of Acceptance Procedure for
Guaranteed Delivery by using the accompanying Notice of
Guaranteed Delivery. See Instruction 2 in this Letter of
Transmittal, Procedure for Guaranteed Delivery.
The terms and conditions of the Offer are incorporated by
reference into this Letter of Transmittal. Capitalized terms
used but not defined in this Letter of Transmittal which are
defined in the Offer and accompanying Circular (as it may be
amended from time to time, the Circular) dated
February 8, 2007 have the meanings ascribed to them in the
Offer and the Circular.
The Depositary, the Dealer Managers, the Information Agent or
your broker or other financial advisor can assist you in
completing this Letter of Transmittal (see back page of this
Letter of Transmittal for addresses and telephone numbers).
Shareholders whose Common Shares are registered in the name of
an investment advisor, stockbroker, bank, trust company or other
nominee should contact such nominee if they wish to accept the
Offer.
The Letter of Transmittal is to be used if Common Share
certificates are to be forwarded herewith or, unless an
Agents Message is utilized, if delivery of Common Shares
is to be made by book-entry transfer to an account maintained by
the Depositary at DTC.
DELIVERY OF THIS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO AN ADDRESS OTHER
THAN AS SET FORTH ON THE BACK PAGE WILL NOT
CONSTITUTE A VALID DELIVERY TO THE DEPOSITARY. YOU MUST SIGN THE
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL IN THE APPROPRIATE SPACE PROVIDED BELOW
AND IF YOU ARE A U.S. HOLDER, YOU MUST ALSO COMPLETE THE
SUBSTITUTE
FORM W-9
INCLUDED HEREIN. SEE INSTRUCTION 9 OF THIS LETTER OF
TRANSMITTAL, U.S. SHAREHOLDERS AND SUBSTITUTE
FORM W-9.
Please read carefully the Instructions set forth below
before completing this Letter of Transmittal.
2
TO: SHELL
INVESTMENTS LIMITED
AND TO: CIBC MELLON TRUST COMPANY, as Depositary
The undersigned delivers to you the enclosed certificate(s) for
Common Shares and, subject only to the provisions of the Offer
regarding withdrawal, irrevocably accepts the Offer for such
Common Shares upon the terms and conditions contained in the
Offer. The following are the details of the enclosed
certificate(s):
DESCRIPTION
OF COMMON SHARES DEPOSITED
(Please print of type. If space is insufficient, please attach a
list in the form below)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name in which Registered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Please fill in exactly as name(s)
|
|
|
Number of Common Shares
|
|
|
Number of Common
|
Certificate Number(s)
|
|
|
appear(s) on certificate(s))
|
|
|
Represented by Certificate
|
|
|
Shares Deposited*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Unless otherwise indicated,
the total number of Common Shares evidenced by all certificates
delivered will be deemed to have been deposited. Refer to
Instruction 7 of this Letter of Transmittal, Partial
Tenders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The undersigned:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
acknowledges receipt of the Offer and the Circular and
acknowledges that there will be a binding agreement between the
undersigned and the Offeror, effective immediately following the
time at which the Offeror takes up Common Shares deposited by
the undersigned pursuant to this Letter of Transmittal, in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the Offer;
|
|
|
2.
|
delivers to you the enclosed certificate(s) representing Common
Shares (unless deposit is to be made pursuant to the procedure
for deposit by book-entry transfer set forth in Section 3
of the Offer, Manner of Acceptance Acceptance
by Book-Entry Transfer) and, subject only to the rights of
withdrawal set out in the Offer, irrevocably accepts the Offer
for and in respect of those Common Shares that are being
deposited under the Offer as indicated under the heading
Description of Common Shares Deposited set out
above in this Letter of Transmittal represented by such
certificate(s) (the Deposited Securities) and, on
and subject to the terms and conditions of the Offer, deposits,
sells, assigns and transfers to the Offeror all right, title and
interest in and to the Deposited Securities, including any and
all rights and benefits arising from such Deposited Securities,
including any and all dividends, distributions, payments,
securities, property or other interests which may be declared,
paid, accrued, issued, distributed, made or transferred on or in
respect of the Deposited Securities or any of them on or after
the date of the Offer, including any dividends, distributions or
payments on such dividends, distributions, payments, securities,
property or other interests (collectively,
Distributions) but excluding any regular quarterly
dividend of Shell Canada of no more than $0.11 per Common
Share;
|
|
|
3.
|
represents and warrants that, (i) the undersigned has full
power and authority to deposit, sell, assign and transfer the
Deposited Securities and any Distributions being deposited to
the Offer, (ii) the Deposited Securities and Distributions
have not been sold, assigned or transferred, nor has any
agreement been entered into to sell, assign or transfer any of
the Deposited Securities and Distributions, to any other Person,
(iii) the deposit of such Deposited Securities and
Distributions complies with applicable Laws, and (iv) when
the Deposited Securities and Distributions are taken up and paid
for by the Offeror, the Offeror will acquire good title thereto,
free and clear of all liens, restrictions, charges,
encumbrances, claims, and rights of others;
|
|
|
4.
|
agrees that if, on or after the date hereof, Shell Canada should
divide, combine, reclassify, consolidate, convert or otherwise
change any of the Common Shares or its capitalization, or should
disclose that it has taken or intends to
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
take any such action, then the Offeror may, in its sole
discretion and without prejudice to its rights under
Conditions of the Offer in Section 4 of the
Offer, make such adjustments as it deems appropriate to the
purchase price or other terms of the Offer (including, without
limitation, the type of securities offered to be purchased and
the consideration payable therefor) to reflect such division,
combination, reclassification, consolidation, conversion or
other change;
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
directs the Offeror and the Depositary, upon the Offeror taking
up the Deposited Securities, (i) to issue or cause to be
issued a cheque payable in Canadian dollars (except for payments
in excess of $25 million, which will be made by wire
transfer) representing the cash payment for the Deposited
Securities to which the undersigned is entitled for the
Deposited Securities under the Offer, unless otherwise directed
in this Letter of Transmittal, in the name of the registered
holder of the Deposited Securities and to send such cheque by
first class mail, to the address indicated herein, or to hold
the same for
pick-up, as
indicated herein, and (ii) to return any certificates for
Deposited Securities not deposited to or purchased under the
Offer by either (a) sending new certificates representing
Common Shares not purchased or by returning the deposited
certificates (and other relevant documents) to the address
indicated herein, or (b) in the case of Common Shares
deposited by book-entry transfer of such Common Shares pursuant
to the procedures set forth in Manner of
Acceptance Acceptance by Book-Entry Transfer
in Section 3 of the Offer, such Common Shares will be
credited to the depositing holders account maintained with
CDS or DTC, as applicable (and, in the case of both (i) and
(ii) above, if no name, address or delivery instructions
are indicated, to the undersigned at the address of the
undersigned as shown on the appropriate registers maintained by
or on behalf of Shell Canada). The undersigned understands and
acknowledges that under no circumstances will interest accrue or
be paid by the Offeror or the Depositary on the purchase price
of the Deposited Securities purchased by the Offeror, regardless
of any delay in making such payment;
|
|
|
6.
|
waives any right to receive notice of purchase of the Deposited
Securities;
|
|
|
7.
|
irrevocably appoints, effective from and after the date that the
Offeror takes up the Deposited Securities and any Distributions
deposited herewith (the Effective Time), each
director and officer of the Offeror and any other Person
designated by the Offeror in writing, as the true and lawful
agents, attorneys and
attorneys-in-fact
and proxies, with full power of substitution, in the name of and
on behalf of the undersigned: (i) to register or record the
transfer
and/or
cancellation of such Deposited Securities and any Distributions
(to the extent consisting of securities) on the appropriate
register of holders maintained by or on behalf of Shell Canada,
(ii) to exercise any and all rights of the undersigned
including, without limitation, in connection with any meeting or
meetings (whether annual, special or otherwise or any
adjournment thereof, including, without limitation, any meeting
to consider a Subsequent Acquisition Transaction) of holders of
relevant securities of Shell Canada, to vote any or all
Deposited Securities and Distributions, to execute and deliver
any and all instruments of proxy, authorizations or consents in
form and on terms satisfactory to the Offeror in respect of any
or all Deposited Securities and any Distributions and to
designate in any such instrument, authorization or consent any
Person or Persons as the proxyholder of the undersigned in
respect of the Deposited Securities
and/or
Distributions, for all purposes, and (iii) to execute,
endorse and negotiate, for and in the name of and on behalf of
the undersigned, any and all cheques or other instruments
representing any Distribution payable to or to the order of, or
endorsed in favour of, the undersigned;
|
|
|
8.
|
revokes any and all other authority, whether as agent,
attorney-in-fact,
attorney, proxy or otherwise, previously conferred or agreed to
be conferred by the undersigned at any time with respect to the
Deposited Securities or any Distributions and agrees that no
subsequent authority, whether as agent,
attorney-in-fact,
attorney, proxy or otherwise will be granted with respect to the
Deposited Securities or any Distributions by or on behalf of the
undersigned, unless the Deposited Securities are withdrawn or
are not taken up and paid for under the Offer. The undersigned
also agrees not to vote any of the Deposited Securities or any
Distributions at any meeting (whether annual, special or
otherwise or any adjournment thereof, including, without
limitation, any meeting to consider a Subsequent Acquisition
Transaction) of holders of securities of Shell Canada and not to
exercise any of the other rights or privileges attached to the
Deposited Securities or any Distributions, and agrees to execute
and deliver to the Offeror any and all instruments of proxy,
authorizations or consents in respect of all or any of the
Deposited Securities or Distributions, and to appoint in any
such instruments of proxy, authorizations or consents, the
Person or Persons specified by the Offeror as the proxyholder of
the Deposited Securities and Distributions and acknowledges that
upon such appointment, all prior proxies and other
authorizations (including without limitation, all appointments
of any agent, attorney or
attorney-in-fact)
or consents given by the holder of such Deposited Securities and
Distributions with respect thereto shall be revoked and no
subsequent proxies or other authorizations or consents may be
given by such Person with respect thereto;
|
4
|
|
|
|
9.
|
agrees that if, on or after the date of the Offer, Shell Canada
should declare, make or pay any Distribution in respect of
Common Shares deposited by the undersigned and accepted for
purchase pursuant to the Offer which is payable or distributable
to Shareholders on a record date which is prior to the transfer
of such Common Shares into the name of the Offeror or its
nominees or transferees on the share register maintained by or
on behalf of Shell Canada, then without prejudice to the
Offerors rights under Section 4 of the Offer the
whole of any such Distribution (other than the payment of a
quarterly cash dividend on the Common Shares of no more than
$0.11 per Common Share), will be received and held by the
undersigned for the account of and for the benefit of the
Offeror and will be promptly remitted and transferred by the
undersigned to the Depositary for the account of the Offeror,
accompanied by appropriate documentation of transfer. Pending
such remittance, the Offeror will be entitled to all rights and
privileges as owner of any such Distribution and may withhold
the entire purchase price payable by the Offeror pursuant to the
Offer or deduct from the consideration payable by the Offeror
pursuant to the Offer the amount or value of the Distribution,
as determined by the Offeror in its sole discretion;
|
|
|
10.
|
covenants to execute, upon a request of the Offeror, any
additional documents, transfers and other assurances as may be
necessary or desirable to complete the sale, assignment and
transfer of the Deposited Securities
and/or
Distributions to the Offeror;
|
|
|
11.
|
acknowledges that all authority conferred or agreed to be
conferred by the undersigned herein may be exercised during any
subsequent legal incapacity of the undersigned and shall to the
extent permitted by Law, survive the death or incapacity,
bankruptcy or insolvency of the undersigned and all obligations
of the undersigned herein shall be binding upon the heirs,
personal representatives, successors and assigns of the
undersigned;
|
|
|
12.
|
by virtue of the execution of this Letter of Transmittal, shall
be deemed to have agreed that all questions as to validity,
form, eligibility (including timely receipt) and acceptance of
any Deposited Securities (and/or Distributions) deposited
pursuant to the Offer will be determined by the Offeror in its
sole discretion and that such determination shall be final and
binding and acknowledges that (i) the Offeror reserves the
absolute right to reject any and all deposits of Deposited
Securities (and/or any Distributions) which the Offeror
determines not to be in proper form or which may be unlawful to
accept under the Laws of any jurisdiction, (ii) the Offeror
reserves the absolute right to waive any defect or irregularity
in the deposit of any Deposited Securities (and/or any
Distributions), (iii) there shall be no duty or obligation
on the Offeror, the Dealer Managers, any Soliciting Dealer, the
Information Agent or the Depositary or any other person to give
notice of any defect or irregularity in any deposit and no
liability shall be incurred by any of them for failure to give
such notice, (iv) the Offerors interpretation of the
terms and conditions of the Offer, the Circular, this Letter of
Transmittal and the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery shall be final
and binding, and (v) the Offeror reserves the right to
permit the Offer to be accepted in a manner other than as set
forth in the Offer; and
|
|
|
13.
|
by reason of the use of an English language form of Letter of
Transmittal, shall be deemed to have required that any contract
evidenced by the Offer as accepted through this Letter of
Transmittal, as well as all documents related thereto, be drawn
exclusively in the English language. En raison de
lusage dune version anglaise de la présente
lettre de transmission, le soussigné est réputé
avoir demandé que tout contrat attesté par
loffre, telle quelle est acceptée au moyen de
cette lettre de transmission, de même que tous les
documents qui sy rapportent, soient rédigés
exclusivement en anglais.
|
5
SHAREHOLDER
INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS
Before signing this Letter of Transmittal, please review
carefully and complete the following boxes, as
appropriate.
BLOCK A
PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS
ISSUE CHEQUE IN THE NAME OF:
(Please print or type)
(Name)
(Street Address and
Number)
(City and Province or
State)
(Country and Postal (or Zip)
Code)
(Telephone Business
Hours)
(Social Insurance, Social
Security Number or
Tax Identification
Number)
BLOCK B
DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS
SEND CHEQUE (UNLESS BLOCK C BELOW IS CHECKED), TO:
(Please print or type)
o Same as address in Block A,
or to:
(Name)
(Street Address and
Number)
(City and Province or
State)
(Country and Postal (or Zip)
Code)
(Telephone Business
Hours)
(Social Insurance, Social
Security Number or
Tax Identification
Number)
BLOCK C
SPECIAL
PICK-UP
INSTRUCTIONS
|
|
o |
Hold cheque for
pick-up.
|
(Please check here if applicable)
6
BLOCK D
U.S. SHAREHOLDERS
(See Instruction 9)
A U.S. Shareholder is any shareholder that is
either (A) providing an address in Block B which is located
within the United States or any territory or possession thereof,
or (B) a United States person for United States federal
income tax purposes.
INDICATE WHETHER OR NOT YOU ARE A U.S. SHAREHOLDER OR ARE
ACTING ON BEHALF OF A U.S. SHAREHOLDER:
|
|
o
|
The owner signing this Letter of Transmittal represents that it
is not a U.S. Shareholder and is not acting on behalf of a
U.S. Shareholder.
|
|
o
|
The owner signing this Letter of Transmittal is a
U.S. Shareholder or is acting on behalf of a
U.S. Shareholder.
|
IF YOU ARE A U.S. SHAREHOLDER OR ARE ACTING ON BEHALF OF
A U.S. SHAREHOLDER, THEN IN
ORDER TO AVOID BACKUP WITHHOLDING YOU MUST COMPLETE THE
SUBSTITUTE
FORM W-9
ATTACHED HERETO, OR OTHERWISE PROVIDE CERTIFICATION THAT YOU ARE
EXEMPT
FROM BACKUP WITHHOLDING, AS PROVIDED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS.
BLOCK E
DEPOSIT PURSUANT TO NOTICE OF GUARANTEED DELIVERY
(See Instruction 2)
|
|
o |
Check here if Common Shares are being deposited pursuant to the
Notice of Guaranteed Delivery sent to the Toronto, Ontario,
Canada office of the Depositary and complete the following
(please print or type):
|
|
|
Name of
Registered
Holder _
_
|
Date of
Guaranteed
Delivery _
_
|
Window Ticket Number (if
any) _
_
Name of Institution which Guaranteed
Delivery _
_
BLOCK F
INVESTMENT DEALER OR BROKER SOLICITING ACCEPTANCE OF THE
OFFER
(See Instruction 8)
The Shareholder signing below represents that the member of the
Soliciting Dealer Group who solicited and obtained this deposit
is (please print or type):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Firm)
|
|
(Registered Representative)
|
|
(Telephone Number)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Address)
|
|
(Fax Number)
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
Check here if list of beneficial holders is attached
|
|
o
|
Check here if list of beneficial holders is to follow
|
7
SHAREHOLDER
SIGNATURE
By signing below, the undersigned expressly agrees to the terms
and conditions set forth above.
|
|
|
Signature guaranteed by (if
required under Instruction 4 to this Letter of Transmittal,
Guarantee of Signatures):
|
|
Dated:
_
_
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized Signature of Guarantor
|
|
Signature of Shareholder or
Authorized Representative (see Instructions 3, 4 and 5 to
this Letter of Transmittal, Signatures,
Guarantee of Signatures and Fiduciaries
Representatives and Authorizations, respectively)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Guarantor (please print or
type)
|
|
Name of Shareholder or Authorized
Representative (please print or type)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Address of Guarantor (please print
or type)
|
|
Telephone number (business hours)
of Shareholder or Authorized Representative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Social Insurance or Social
Security Number or Tax Identification Number of Shareholder
|
|
|
|
Additional Signatures for
Joint Shareholders
(if required)
|
|
Dated:
_
_
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature of Shareholder or
Authorized Representative (see Instructions 3, 4 and 5 to
this Letter of Transmittal, Signatures,
Guarantee of Signatures and Fiduciaries
Representatives and Authorizations, respectively)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Shareholder or Authorized
Representative (please print or type)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone number (business hours)
of Shareholder or Authorized Representative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Social Insurance or Social
Security Number or Tax Identification Number of Shareholder
|
8
INSTRUCTIONS
|
|
1.
|
Use of
Letter of Transmittal
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
This Letter of Transmittal (or manually signed facsimile copy
hereof) properly completed and duly executed as required by the
instructions set forth below, together with accompanying
certificate(s) representing the Deposited Securities (or,
alternatively, a book-entry transfer for Shareholders accepting
the Offer by following the procedures for book-entry transfer
established by CDS, provided that a Book-Entry Confirmation
through CDSX is received by the Depositary, or by following the
procedures for book-entry transfer established by DTC, provided
that a Book-Entry Confirmation, together with an Agents
Message in respect thereof, is received by the Depositary) and
all other documents required by the terms of the Offer and this
Letter of Transmittal, must be received by the Depositary at any
of the offices of the Depositary specified on the back of this
Letter of Transmittal at or before 8:00 p.m. (Toronto time)
on March 16, 2007, being the Expiry Time, or such later
time or times and date or dates to which the Offer may be
extended, unless the Offer is withdrawn or unless the procedures
for guaranteed delivery set out in Instruction 2 below,
Procedure for Guaranteed Delivery, are employed.
Shareholders accepting this Offer using book-entry transfer must
ensure that the required documents are sent to the Depositary,
if sent by mail, at its office in Toronto, Ontario, Canada or,
if sent by registered mail, hand or courier, at either its
office in Toronto, Ontario or Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
|
|
|
(b)
|
The method of delivery of this Letter of Transmittal, the
certificate(s) representing the Deposited Securities and all
other required documents, is at the option and risk of the
person depositing same, and delivery will be deemed effective
only when such documents have been physically received by the
Depositary at any of its offices as specified herein. The
Offeror recommends that such documents be delivered by hand to
the Depositary and a receipt be obtained therefor, or, if
mailed, that registered mail, with return receipt requested, be
used and that proper insurance be obtained. It is suggested that
any such mailing be made sufficiently in advance of the Expiry
Time to ensure delivery to the Depositary prior to the Expiry
Time. Shareholders whose Common Shares are registered in the
name of a nominee should contact their broker, investment
dealer, bank, trust company or other nominee for assistance in
depositing the Common Shares.
|
|
|
2.
|
Procedure
for Guaranteed Delivery
|
If a Shareholder wishes to deposit Common Shares pursuant to the
Offer and the certificate(s) representing such Common Shares are
not immediately available or such Shareholder is not able to
deliver such certificate(s) and all other required documents to
the Depositary at or prior to the Expiry Time, such Common
Shares may nevertheless be deposited under the Offer provided
that all of the following conditions are met:
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
such deposit is made by or through an Eligible Institution (as
defined below);
|
|
|
(b)
|
a Notice of Guaranteed Delivery (printed on green paper) in the
form accompanying the Offer and Circular or a facsimile thereof,
properly completed and duly executed, including a guarantee by
an Eligible Institution in the form specified in the Notice of
Guaranteed Delivery, is received by the Depositary at its office
in Toronto, Ontario, Canada as set out in the Notice of
Guaranteed Delivery, at or prior to the Expiry Time; and
|
|
|
(c)
|
the certificate(s) representing deposited Common Shares in
proper form for transfer together with this Letter of
Transmittal or a facsimile thereof, properly completed and duly
executed, with any required signatures and all other documents
required by this Letter of Transmittal, are received by the
Depositary at its office in Toronto, Ontario, Canada as set out
in the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery prior to 5:00 p.m.
(Toronto time) on the third trading day on the TSX after the
Expiry Time.
|
The Notice of Guaranteed Delivery may be delivered by hand or
courier or transmitted by facsimile or mail to the Depositary at
its office in Toronto, Ontario, Canada at or prior to the Expiry
Time and must include a guarantee by an Eligible Institution in
the manner set forth in the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery.
Delivery of the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery and this Letter
of Transmittal and accompanying certificates to any office other
than the Toronto, Ontario, Canada office of the Depositary does
not constitute delivery for purposes of satisfying a guaranteed
delivery.
An Eligible Institution means a Canadian
Schedule I chartered bank, a major trust company in Canada,
a member of the Securities Transfer Agents Medallion Program
(STAMP), a member of the Stock Exchanges Medallion Program
(SEMP) or a member of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
Medallion Signature Program (MSP). Members of these programs are
usually members of a recognized stock exchange in Canada or the
United States, members of the Investment Dealers Association of
Canada, members of the National Association of Securities
Dealers or banks and trust companies in the United States.
9
This Letter of Transmittal must be completed and executed by the
holder of Common Shares accepting the Offer described above or
by such holders duly authorized representative (in
accordance with Instruction 5, Fiduciaries,
Representatives and Authorizations below).
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
If this Letter of Transmittal is executed by the registered
owner(s) of the accompanying certificate(s), such signature(s)
on this Letter of Transmittal must correspond exactly with the
name(s) as registered or as written on the face of such
certificate(s) without any change whatsoever, and the
certificate(s) need not be endorsed. If such transmitted
certificate(s) are owned or held of record by two or more joint
owners, all such owners must sign this Letter of Transmittal.
|
|
|
(b)
|
If this Letter of Transmittal is executed by a Person other than
the registered owner(s) of the accompanying certificate(s) or if
the cheque(s) are to be issued to a Person other than the
registered owner(s) or sent to an address other than the address
of the registered owner(s) as shown on the register of
Shareholders maintained by or on behalf of Shell Canada, or if
certificates representing Common Shares for which the Offer has
not been accepted are to be returned to a person other than such
registered owner(s) or sent to an address other than the address
of the registered owner(s) as shown on the register of
Shareholders maintained by or on behalf of Shell Canada:
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
such deposited certificate(s) must be endorsed or be accompanied
by an appropriate share transfer power of attorney duly and
properly completed by the registered owner(s); and
|
|
|
(ii)
|
the signature(s) on such endorsement or share transfer power of
attorney must correspond exactly to the name(s) of the
registered owner(s) as registered or as appearing on the
certificate(s) and must be guaranteed as noted in
Instruction 4, Guarantee of Signatures, below.
|
|
|
4.
|
Guarantee
of Signatures
|
If this Letter of Transmittal is executed by a person other than
the registered owner(s) of the Common Shares, if the cheque(s)
are to be issued to a person other than such registered owner(s)
or sent to an address other than the address of the registered
owner(s) as shown on the register of Shareholders maintained by
or on behalf of Shell Canada, or if certificates representing
Common Shares for which the Offer has not been accepted are to
be returned to a person other than such registered owner(s) or
sent to an address other than the address of the registered
owner(s) as shown on the register of Shareholders maintained by
or on behalf of Shell Canada, such signature must be guaranteed
by an Eligible Institution, or in some other manner satisfactory
to the Depositary (except that no guarantee is required if the
signature is that of an Eligible Institution).
|
|
5.
|
Fiduciaries,
Representatives and Authorizations
|
Where this Letter of Transmittal or any certificate or share
transfer power of attorney is executed by a person on behalf of
an executor, administrator, trustee, guardian,
attorney-in-fact,
agent, corporation, partnership or association, or is executed
by any other person acting in a fiduciary or representative
capacity, such person should so indicate when signing and this
Letter of Transmittal must be accompanied by satisfactory
evidence of such persons authority to act. Either of the
Offeror or the Depositary, at its discretion, may require
additional evidence of such authority or any other additional
documentation.
If any cheque(s) are to be sent to or, in respect of partial
deposits of Common Shares, certificates representing Common
Shares are to be returned to, someone at an address other than
the address of the Shareholder at it appears in Block A on this
Letter of Transmittal, entitled Payment
Instructions, then Block B on this Letter of Transmittal,
entitled Delivery Instructions, should be completed.
If Block B is not completed, any cheque(s) will be mailed to the
depositing Shareholder at the address of such holder as it
appears in Block A or, if no address is provided in Block A,
then any cheque(s) will be mailed to the address of such holder
as it appears on the securities register of Shell Canada. Any
cheque(s) mailed in accordance with the Offer and this Letter of
Transmittal will be deemed to be delivered on the date of
mailing.
10
If less than the total number of Common Shares evidenced by any
certificate submitted is to be deposited under the Offer, fill
in the number of Common Shares to be deposited in the
appropriate space on this Letter of Transmittal. In such case,
new certificate(s) for the number of Common Shares not deposited
will be sent to the registered holder as soon as practicable
following the Expiry Time. The total number of Common Shares
evidenced by all certificates delivered will be deemed to have
been deposited unless otherwise indicated. If certificate(s)
representing Common Shares not deposited to or purchased under
the Offer are to be returned other than in the name of, and to
the address of the person shown in the registers maintained by
or on behalf of Shell Canada, complete Block B on this Letter of
Transmittal.
Identify the investment dealer or broker, if any, who solicited
acceptance of the Offer by completing Block F on this Letter of
Transmittal. If this Letter of Transmittal represents more than
one beneficial holder, all beneficial holder information must be
provided on a list that must accompany the deposit or on a
diskette that must be timely forwarded to the place of deposit.
|
|
9.
|
U.S. Shareholders
and Substitute
Form W-9
|
United States federal income tax law generally requires that a
U.S. Holder who receives cash in exchange for Common Shares
must provide the Depositary with his correct Taxpayer
Identification Number (TIN), which, in the case of a
Shareholder who is an individual, is generally the
individuals social security number. If the Depositary is
not provided with the correct TIN or an adequate basis for an
exemption, such holder may be subject to penalties imposed by
the Internal Revenue Service and backup withholding in an amount
equal to 28% of the gross proceeds of any payment received
hereunder. If withholding results in an overpayment of taxes, a
refund may be obtained.
To prevent backup withholding, each U.S. Holder must
provide his correct TIN by completing the Substitute
Form W-9
attached to this document, which requires such holder to certify
under penalties of perjury: (i) that the TIN provided is
correct (or that such holder is awaiting a TIN); (ii) that
the holder is not subject to backup withholding because:
(a) the holder is exempt from backup withholding;
(b) the holder has not been notified by the Internal
Revenue Service that he is subject to backup withholding as a
result of a failure to report all interest or dividends; or
(c) the Internal Revenue Service has notified the holder
that he is no longer subject to backup withholding; and
(iii) that the holder is a U.S. person (including a
U.S. resident alien). For information about what number to
provide the Depositary, see Guidelines for Certification
of Taxpayer Identification Number on Substitute
Form W-9.
Exempt holders (including, among others, all corporations) are
not subject to backup withholding and reporting requirements.
For more information, see Guidelines for Certification of
Taxpayer Identification Number on Substitute
Form W-9.
To prevent possible erroneous backup withholding, an exempt
holder must complete Substitute
Form W-9,
check the Exempt from backup withholding box on such
form, and sign and date the form. See the instructions in the
attached Substitute
Form W-9
for additional instructions.
If Common Shares are held in more than one name or are not in
the name of the actual owner, consult the Guidelines for
Certification of Taxpayer Identification Number on Substitute
Form W-9.
If a U.S. Holder does not have a TIN, such holder should:
(i) consult the Guidelines for Certification of
Taxpayer Identification Number on Substitute
Form W-9;
(ii) write Applied For in the space for the TIN
in Part 1 of the Substitute
Form W-9;
and (iii) sign and date the Substitute
Form W-9
attached to this document. In such case, the Depositary may
withhold 28% of the gross proceeds of any payment made to such
holder prior to the time a properly certified TIN is provided to
the Depositary, and if the Depositary is not provided with a TIN
within sixty (60) days, such amounts will be paid over to
the Internal Revenue Service.
If the Substitute
Form W-9
is not applicable to a U.S. Shareholder because such holder
is not a U.S. person for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, such holder will instead need to submit a properly
completed IRS
Form W-8
BEN Certificate of Foreign Status of Beneficial Owner for United
States Tax Withholding, signed under penalty of perjury. A copy
of IRS
Form W-8
BEN may be obtained from the Depositary.
A U.S. HOLDER WHO FAILS TO PROPERLY COMPLETE THE
SUBSTITUTE
FORM W-9
ATTACHED TO THIS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL MAY BE SUBJECT TO BACKUP
WITHHOLDING OF 28% OF THE GROSS PROCEEDS OF ANY PAYMENTS MADE TO
SUCH HOLDER PURSUANT TO THE OFFER.
11
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
If the space on this Letter of Transmittal is insufficient to
list all certificates for Common Shares, additional certificate
numbers and numbers of Common Shares may be included in a
separate signed list affixed to this Letter of Transmittal.
|
|
|
(b)
|
If Common Shares are registered in different forms (e.g.
Joe Doe and J. Doe), a separate Letter
of Transmittal should be signed for each different registration.
|
|
|
(c)
|
No alternative, conditional or contingent deposits will be
accepted. All depositing Shareholders by execution of this
Letter of Transmittal (or a manually executed facsimile copy
hereof) waive any right to receive any notice of acceptance of
Common Shares for payment.
|
|
|
(d)
|
The Offer and any agreement resulting from the acceptance of the
Offer will be construed in accordance with and governed by the
laws of the Province of Alberta and the laws of Canada
applicable therein.
|
|
|
(e)
|
All questions as to the validity, form, eligibility (including
timely receipt) and acceptance of Common Shares deposited
pursuant to the Offer will be determined by the Offeror in its
sole discretion, which determination shall be final and binding.
The Offeror reserves the absolute right to reject any and all
deposits which it determines not to be in proper form or which
may be unlawful to accept under the Laws of any jurisdiction.
The Offeror reserves the absolute right to waive any defects or
irregularities in the deposit of any Common Shares. There shall
be no duty or obligation of the Offeror, the Dealer Managers,
any Soliciting Dealer, the Information Agent or the Depositary
or any other Person to give notice of any defects or
irregularities in any deposit and no liability shall be incurred
by any of them for failure to give any such notice. The
Offerors interpretation of the terms and conditions of the
Offer, the Circular, the Letter of Transmittal and the Notice of
Guaranteed Delivery will be final and binding. The Offeror
reserves the right to permit the Offer to be accepted in a
manner other than as set forth in the Offer and Circular.
|
|
|
(f)
|
Additional copies of the Offer and Circular, this Letter of
Transmittal and the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery may be
obtained without charge on request from the Depositary, the
Dealer Managers or the Information Agent.
|
If a share certificate has been lost or destroyed, this Letter
of Transmittal should be completed as fully as possible and
forwarded, together with a letter describing the loss, to the
Depositary at its office in Toronto, Ontario, Canada listed
herein. The Depositary will forward such letter to the transfer
agent for the Common Shares so that the transfer agent may
provide replacement instructions. If a share certificate has
been lost or destroyed, please ensure that you provide your
telephone number to the Depositary so that the Depositary or the
transfer agent for the Common Shares may contact you. If your
share certificate has been lost or destroyed, you must take the
foregoing action sufficiently in advance of the Expiry Time in
order to obtain a replacement certificate in sufficient time to
permit the replacement certificate to be tendered to the Offer
prior to the Expiry Time.
The Depositary is committed to protecting personal information
received from its clients. In the course of providing services
to its clients, the Depositary receives certain non-public
personal information. This information could include an
individuals name, address, social insurance number,
securities holdings and other financial information. The
Depositary uses this information for lawful purposes relating to
its services. The Depositary has prepared a Privacy Code
relating to information practices and privacy protection. It is
available at computershare.com, or by writing the Depositary at
the addresses indicated below. The Depositary will use the
information provided on this form in order to process the
undersigned Shareholders request and will treat the
Shareholders signature(s) on this form as such
Shareholders consent to the above.
The Depositary, the Dealer Managers, the Information Agent or
your broker or other financial advisor can assist you in
completing this Letter of Transmittal (see back page of this
Letter of Transmittal for addresses and telephone numbers).
Shareholders whose Common Shares are registered in the name of
an investment advisor, stockbroker, bank, trust company or other
nominee should contact such nominee if they wish to accept the
Offer.
THIS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL OR A MANUALLY SIGNED FACSIMILE
(TOGETHER WITH CERTIFICATES FOR DEPOSITED SHARES AND ALL
OTHER REQUIRED DOCUMENTS) OR THE NOTICE OF GUARANTEED DELIVERY
OR A MANUALLY SIGNED FACSIMILE THEREOF MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE
DEPOSITARY AT OR PRIOR TO THE EXPIRY TIME.
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAYERS NAME:
|
PAYEES
NAME: _
_
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAYEES
ADDRESS: _
_
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUBSTITUTE
FORM W-9 Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Payers Request for Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) and Certification
|
|
|
Part I: Taxpayer
Identification Number (TIN)
Social
Security Number
OR
Employer
Identification Number
(If awaiting TIN write Applied For and complete
Part III and the Certificate of Awaiting Taxpayer
Identification Number)
|
|
|
Part II: For Payees Exempt
from Backup Withholding
For Payees Exempt from
Backup withholding, see the Guidelines below and complete as
instructed therein.
|
|
|
|
Part III:
Certification
Under penalties of perjury, I certify that:
|
|
|
|
(1) The number shown on this
form is my correct Taxpayer Identification Number (or I am
waiting for a number to be issued to me), and
|
|
|
|
(2) I am not subject to backup
withholding because: (a) I am exempt from backup
withholding, or (b) I have not been notified by the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that I am subject to backup
withholding as a result of failure to report all interest or
dividends, or (c) the IRS has notified me that I am no
longer subject to backup withholding, and
|
|
|
|
(3) I am a U.S. person
(including a U.S. resident alien).
|
|
|
|
Certification
Instructions
You must cross out item (2) above if you have been notified
by the IRS that you are currently subject to backup withholding
because you have failed to report all interest and dividends on
your tax return. However, if after being notified by the IRS
that you were subject to backup withholding you received another
notification from the IRS that you are no longer subject to
backup withholding, do not cross out item (2).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature of U.S. person
|
|
|
Date
|
NOTE: FAILURE
TO COMPLETE AND RETURN THIS FORM MAY RESULT IN BACKUP
WITHHOLDING OF 28% OF ANY PAYMENTS MADE TO YOU PURSUANT TO THE
TENDER OFFER. PLEASE REVIEW THE ENCLOSED GUIDELINES FOR
CERTIFICATION OF TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ON SUBSTITUTE
FORM W-9 FOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
|
|
YOU MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING
CERTIFICATION IF YOU WROTE APPLIED FOR IN THE
APPROPRIATE LINE IN PART I OF SUBSTITUTE FORM
W-9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CERTIFICATE OF AWAITING TAXPAYER
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
|
|
I
certify under penalties of perjury that a taxpayer
identification number has not been issued to me, and either
(a) I have mailed or delivered an application to receive a
taxpayer identification number to the appropriate Internal
Revenue Service Center or Social Security Administration Office
or (b) I intend to mail or deliver an application in the
near future. I understand that if I do not provide a taxpayer
identification number by the time of payment, 28% of all
reportable payments made to me pursuant to the tender offer will
be withheld.
|
13
GUIDELINES
FOR CERTIFICATION OF TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION
NUMBER ON
SUBSTITUTE FORM
W-9
Guidelines for Determining the Proper Identification Number for
the Payee (You) to Give the Payer.Social security numbers
have nine digits separated by two hyphens: i.e., 000-00-0000.
Employee identification numbers have nine digits separated by
only one hyphen: i.e., 00-0000000. The table below will help
determine the number to give the payer. All Section
references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
IRS is the Internal Revenue Service.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Give the social security
|
For this type of account:
|
|
number of
|
1.
|
|
|
Individual
|
|
The Individual
|
2.
|
|
|
Two or more individuals (joint
account)
|
|
The actual owner of the account or,
if combined funds, the first individual on the account(1)
|
3.
|
|
|
Custodian account of a minor
(Uniform Gift to Minors Act)
|
|
The minor(2)
|
4.
|
|
|
a. The usual revocable savings
trust account (grantor is also trustee)
|
|
The grantor trustee(1)
|
|
|
|
b. So-called trust account
that is not a legal or valid trust under state law
|
|
The actual owner(1)
|
5.
|
|
|
Sole proprietorship
|
|
The owner(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Give the employer
|
For this type of account:
|
|
identification number of
|
6.
|
|
|
Sole proprietorship
|
|
The owner(3)
|
7.
|
|
|
A valid trust, estate, or pension
trust
|
|
The legal entity(4)
|
8.
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
The corporation
|
9.
|
|
|
Association, club, religious,
charitable, educational, or other tax-exempt organization
|
|
The organization
|
10.
|
|
|
Partnership
|
|
The partnership
|
11.
|
|
|
A broker or registered nominee
|
|
The broker or nominee
|
12.
|
|
|
Account with the Department of
Agriculture in the name of a public entity (such as a state or
local government, school district, or prison) that receives
agricultural program payments
|
|
The public entity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
List first and circle the name of
the person whose number you furnish. If only one person on a
joint account has a social security number, that persons
number must be furnished.
|
(2)
|
|
Circle the minors name and
furnish the minors social security number.
|
(3)
|
|
You must show your individual name,
but you may also enter your business or doing business
as name. You may use either your social security number or
your employer identification number (if you have one).
|
(4)
|
|
List first and circle the name of
the legal trust, estate, or pension trust. (Do not furnish the
taxpayer identification number of the personal representative or
trustee unless the legal entity itself is not designated in the
account title.)
|
|
|
NOTE: |
If no name is circled when there is more than one name, the
number will be considered to be that of the first name listed.
|
14
Obtaining a Number
If you dont have a taxpayer
identification number or you dont know your number, obtain
Form SS-5,
Application for a Social Security Card, at the local Social
Security Administration office, or
Form SS-4,
Application for Employer Identification Number, by calling 1
(800) TAX-FORM, and apply for a number.
Payees Exempt from Backup Withholding
Payees specifically exempted from
withholding include:
|
|
|
An organization exempt from tax
under Section 501(a), an individual retirement account
(IRA), or a custodial account under Section 403(b)(7), if
the account satisfies the requirements of Section 401(f)(2).
|
|
The United States or a state
thereof, the District of Columbia, a possession of the United
States, or a political subdivision or instrumentality of any one
or more of the foregoing.
|
|
An international organization or
any agency or instrumentality thereof.
|
|
A foreign government and any
political subdivision, agency or instrumentality thereof.
|
Payees that may be
exempt from backup withholding include:
|
|
|
A corporation.
|
|
A financial institution.
|
|
A dealer in securities or
commodities required to register in the United States, the
District of Columbia, or a possession of the United States.
|
|
A real estate investment trust.
|
|
A common trust fund operated by a
bank under Section 584(a).
|
|
An entity registered at all times
during the tax year under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
|
|
A middleman known in the investment
community as a nominee or custodian.
|
|
A futures commission merchant
registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
|
|
A foreign central bank of issue.
|
|
A trust exempt from tax under
Section 664 or described in Section 4947.
|
Payments of dividends
and patronage dividends generally exempt from backup withholding
include:
|
|
|
Payments to nonresident aliens
subject to withholding under Section 1441.
|
|
Payments to partnerships not
engaged in a trade or business in the United States and that
have at least one nonresident alien partner.
|
|
Payments of patronage dividends not
paid in money.
|
|
Payments made by certain foreign
organizations.
|
|
Section 404(k) payments made
by an ESOP.
|
Payments of interest
generally exempt from backup withholding include:
|
|
|
Payments of interest on obligations
issued by individuals. However, if you pay $600 or more of
interest in the course of your trade or business to a payee, you
must report the payment. Backup withholding applies to the
reportable payment if you have not provided your correct
taxpayer identification number to the payer.
|
|
Payments of tax-exempt interest
(including exempt-interest dividends under Section 852).
|
|
Payments described in
Section 6049(b)(5) to nonresident aliens.
|
|
Payments on tax-free covenant bonds
under Section 1451.
|
|
Payments made by certain foreign
organizations.
|
|
Mortgage or student loan interest
paid to you.
|
Certain payments, other
than payments of interest, dividends, and patronage dividends,
that are exempt from information reporting are also exempt from
backup withholding. For details, see the regulations under
Sections 6041, 6041A, 6042, 6044, 6045, 6049, 6050A and
6050N.
Exempt payees described above
must file
Form W-9
or a substitute
Form W-9
to avoid possible erroneous backup
withholding. FILE
THIS FORM WITH THE PAYER, FURNISH YOUR TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION
NUMBER, WRITE EXEMPT IN PART II OF THE FORM,
SIGN AND DATE THE FORM, AND RETURN IT TO THE PAYER.
Privacy Act Notice
Section 6109
requires you to provide your correct taxpayer identification
number to payers, who must report the payments to the IRS. The
IRS uses the number for identification purposes and may also
provide this information to various government agencies for tax
enforcement or litigation purposes. Payers must be given the
numbers whether or not recipients are required to file tax
returns. Payers must generally withhold 28% of taxable interest,
dividends, and certain other payments to a payee who does not
furnish a taxpayer identification number to the payer. Certain
penalties may also apply.
Penalties
(1) Failure to Furnish
Taxpayer Identification Number.
If you fail to furnish
your taxpayer identification number to a payer, you are subject
to a penalty of $50 for each such failure unless your failure is
due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect.
(2) Civil Penalty for False
Information With Respect to Withholding.
If you make a false
statement with no reasonable basis that results in no backup
withholding, you are subject to a $500 penalty.
(3) Criminal Penalty for
Falsifying Information.
Willfully falsifying
certifications or affirmations may subject you to criminal
penalties including fines and/or imprisonment.
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
CONTACT YOUR TAX
CONSULTANT OR THE INTERNAL
REVENUE SERVICE
15
The
Depositary for the Offer is:
CIBC MELLON TRUST COMPANY
|
|
|
By Mail
|
|
By Registered Mail, Hand or by
Courier
|
P.O. Box 1036
Adelaide Street Postal Station
Toronto, ON M5C 2K4
|
|
199 Bay Street
Commerce Court West
Securities Level
Toronto, ON M5L 1G9
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
600 The Dome Tower
333-7th Avenue
S.W.
Calgary, AB T2P 2Z1
|
Toll Free:
1-800-387-0825
Telephone:
(416) 643-5500
E-Mail:
inquiries@cibcmellon.com
The Dealer Managers for the Offer are:
In Canada
|
|
|
MORGAN STANLEY CANADA LIMITED
|
|
SCOTIA CAPITAL INC.
|
Suite 3700, 181 Bay Street
Toronto, Ontario
M5J 2T3
Telephone:
416-943-8400
Fax:
416-943-8320
|
|
Suite 1800, Scotia Centre
700
2nd Street
S.W.
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 2W1
Telephone: 403-213-7777
Fax: 403-213-7773
|
The Information Agent for the Offer is:
Kingsdale Shareholder Services
Inc.
The Exchange Tower
130 King Street West, Suite 2950
P.O. Box 361, Toronto, Ontario
Any questions and requests for assistance may be directed by
holders of Common Shares to the Depositary,
the Dealer Managers or the Information Agent at their respective
telephone numbers and locations set out above.
Shareholders may also contact their broker, dealer, commercial
bank, trust company or other nominee
for assistance concerning the Offer.
exv99wxayx1yxcy
THIS
IS NOT A LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. THIS NOTICE OF GUARANTEED
DELIVERY IS FOR
USE IN ACCEPTING THE OFFER (AS DEFINED BELOW).
NOTICE
OF GUARANTEED DELIVERY
for
Deposits of Common Shares of
SHELL
CANADA LIMITED
pursuant
to the Offer dated February 8, 2007 made by
SHELL
INVESTMENTS LIMITED
a
wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of
ROYAL
DUTCH SHELL plc
THE OFFER WILL BE OPEN FOR
ACCEPTANCE UNTIL 8:00 P.M. (TORONTO TIME)
ON MARCH 16, 2007, UNLESS EXTENDED OR WITHDRAWN (THE
EXPIRY TIME).
SEE TIME FOR ACCEPTANCE IN SECTION 2 OF THE
OFFER.
USE THIS NOTICE OF GUARANTEED
DELIVERY IF YOU WISH TO ACCEPT THE OFFER BUT YOUR COMMON SHARE
CERTIFICATE(S) ARE NOT IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE OR YOU ARE NOT ABLE
TO DELIVER YOUR COMMON SHARE CERTIFICATE(S) TO THE DEPOSITARY OR
THE U.S. FORWARDING
AGENT ON OR PRIOR TO THE EXPIRY TIME.
This Notice of Guaranteed Delivery must be used to accept the
offer dated February 8, 2007 (the Offer) made
by Shell Investments Limited (the Offeror), a
wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell plc, to
purchase all of the issued and outstanding common shares (the
Common Shares) (including all Common Shares which
may become outstanding on or after the date of the Offer and
prior to the Expiry Time) in the capital of Shell Canada Limited
(Shell Canada) not already held by the Offeror or
its affiliates, only if the certificate(s) for the Common Shares
to be deposited are not immediately available or if the holder
of Common Shares (other than the Offeror or its affiliates) (the
Shareholder) is not able to deliver the
certificate(s) and all other required documents to the
Depositary at or prior to the Expiry Time. This Notice of
Guaranteed Delivery may be delivered by hand or courier, mailed
or transmitted by facsimile transmission to the Depositary at
its office in Toronto, Ontario, Canada at the address or
facsimile number listed in this Notice of Guaranteed Delivery.
The terms and conditions of the Offer are incorporated by
reference in this Notice of Guaranteed Delivery. Capitalized
terms used but not defined in this Notice of Guaranteed Delivery
which are defined in the Offer and accompanying Circular (the
Circular) dated February 8, 2007 have the
meanings ascribed to them in the Offer and the Circular.
The Depositary or your broker or other financial advisor can
assist you in completing this Notice of Guaranteed Delivery.
WHEN AND
HOW TO USE THIS NOTICE OF GUARANTEED DELIVERY
As set forth under Manner of Acceptance
Procedure for Guaranteed Delivery in Section 3 of the
Offer, if a Shareholder wishes to deposit Common Shares pursuant
to the Offer and the certificate(s) representing such
Common Shares are not immediately available or such
Shareholder is not able deliver such certificate(s) and all
other required documents to the at or prior to the Expiry Time,
such Common Shares may nevertheless be deposited under the Offer
provided that all of the following conditions are met:
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
such deposit is made by or through an Eligible Institution (as
defined below);
|
|
|
(b)
|
a copy of this Notice of Guaranteed Delivery (printed on green
paper) or a facsimile thereof, properly completed and duly
executed, including a guarantee by an Eligible Institution in
the form set out in this Notice of Guaranteed Delivery, is
received by the Depositary at its office in Toronto, Ontario,
Canada as set out herein, at or prior to the Expiry
Time; and
|
|
|
(c)
|
the certificate(s) representing deposited Common Shares, in
proper form for transfer together with a Letter of Transmittal
in the form accompanying the Offer and Circular or a facsimile
thereof, properly completed and duly executed, with any required
signature guarantees and all other documents required by the
Letter of Transmittal, are received by the Depositary at its
office in Toronto, Ontario, Canada as set out in this Notice of
Guaranteed Delivery prior to 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on
the third trading day on the TSX after the Expiry Time.
|
An Eligible Institution means a Canadian
Schedule I chartered bank, a major trust company in Canada,
a member of the Securities Transfer Agents Medallion Program
(STAMP), a member of the Stock Exchanges Medallion Program
(SEMP) or a member of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
Medallion Signature Program (MSP). Members of these programs are
usually members of a recognized stock exchange in Canada or the
United States, members of the Investment Dealers Association of
Canada, members of the National Association of Securities
Dealers or banks and trust companies in the United States.
The undersigned understands and acknowledges that payment for
Common Shares deposited and taken up by the Offeror will be made
only after timely receipt by the Depositary of: (i) such
certificate(s) representing the Common Shares; and (ii) the
Letter of Transmittal or a facsimile thereof, properly completed
and duly executed, with any signatures guaranteed, if so
required, and all other documents required by the Letter of
Transmittal prior to 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on the third
trading day on the TSX after the Expiry Time. The undersigned
also understands and acknowledges that under no circumstances
will interest accrue or be paid by the Offeror or the Depositary
to persons depositing Common Shares on the purchase price of
Common Shares purchased by the Offeror, regardless of any delay
in making such payment, and that the consideration for the
Common Shares tendered pursuant to the guaranteed delivery
procedures will be the same as that for the Common Shares
delivered to the Depositary prior to the Expiry Time, even if
the Common Shares to be delivered pursuant to the guaranteed
delivery procedures are not so delivered to the Depositary, and
therefore payment by the Depositary on account of such Common
Shares is not made, until after the take up and payment for the
Common Shares under the Offer.
All authority conferred, or agreed to be conferred, by this
Notice of Guaranteed Delivery is, to the extent permitted by
applicable laws, irrevocable and may be exercised during any
subsequent legal incapacity of the undersigned and shall, to the
extent permitted by law, survive the death or incapacity,
bankruptcy or insolvency of the undersigned and all obligations
of the undersigned under this Notice of Guaranteed Delivery
shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators,
attorneys, personal representatives, successors and assigns of
the undersigned.
2
TO: SHELL
INVESTMENTS LIMITED
AND TO: CIBC MELLON TRUST COMPANY, as Depositary
|
|
|
|
|
By Mail
|
|
By Registered Mail, Hand or by
Courier
|
|
By Facsimile
Transmission:
|
P.O. Box 1036Adelaide Street
Postal StationToronto, ON M5C 2K4
|
|
199 Bay Street
Commerce Court West
Securities Level
Toronto, ON M5L 1G9
|
|
Facsimile Number:
(416) 643-3148
|
THE NOTICE OF GUARANTEED DELIVERY MUST BE DELIVERED BY HAND
OR COURIER OR TRANSMITTED BY FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION OR MAILED TO
THE DEPOSITARY AT ITS OFFICE IN TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA LISTED
IN THIS NOTICE OF GUARANTEED DELIVERY AND MUST INCLUDE A
GUARANTEE BY AN ELIGIBLE INSTITUTION IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN
THIS NOTICE OF GUARANTEED DELIVERY.
DELIVERY OF THIS NOTICE OF GUARANTEED DELIVERY TO AN ADDRESS
OR TRANSMISSION OF THIS NOTICE OF GUARANTEED DELIVERY VIA A
FACSIMILE NUMBER OTHER THAN SET FORTH ABOVE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE
A VALID DELIVERY.
TO CONSTITUTE DELIVERY FOR THE PURPOSE OF SATISFYING
GUARANTEED DELIVERY, UPON RECEIPT OF THE CERTIFICATES TO WHICH
THIS NOTICE OF GUARANTEED DELIVERY APPLIES, THE LETTER OF
TRANSMITTAL, ACCOMPANYING CERTIFICATE(S) AND ALL OTHER REQUIRED
DOCUMENTS MUST BE DELIVERED TO THE SAME OFFICE OF THE DEPOSITARY
IN TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA WHERE THIS NOTICE OF GUARANTEED
DELIVERY IS DELIVERED.
THIS NOTICE OF GUARANTEED DELIVERY IS NOT TO BE USED TO
GUARANTEE SIGNATURES ON THE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. IF A
SIGNATURE ON THE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL IS REQUIRED TO BE
GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE INSTITUTION, SUCH SIGNATURE MUST
APPEAR IN THE APPLICABLE SPACE IN THE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL.
DO NOT SEND CERTIFICATES FOR COMMON SHARES WITH THIS
NOTICE OF GUARANTEED DELIVERY. CERTIFICATES FOR COMMON
SHARES MUST BE SENT WITH YOUR LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL.
3
DESCRIPTION
OF COMMON SHARES
The undersigned hereby deposits with the Depositary upon the
terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer, the
Circular and the Letter of Transmittal, receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, the Common Shares described below, pursuant
to the procedures for guaranteed delivery as set forth in
Section 3 of the Offer, Manner of
Acceptance Procedure for Guaranteed Delivery
and Instruction 2 to the Letter of Transmittal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificate Number(s)
|
|
|
Name in which Registered
|
|
|
Number of Common Shares
|
|
|
Number of Common
|
(if available)
|
|
|
(Please print or type and fill in exactly
|
|
|
Represented by Certificate
|
|
|
Shares Deposited*
|
(Please print or type)
|
|
|
as name(s) appear(s) on certificates)
|
|
|
(Please print or type)
|
|
|
(Please print or type)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Unless otherwise indicated,
the total number of Common Shares evidenced by certificates
delivered will be deemed to have been deposited.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENCY
OF PAYMENT
Shareholders will receive payment of consideration under the
Offer in Canadian dollars.
SHAREHOLDER SIGNATURE(S)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature(s)
of Shareholder(s)
|
|
Address(es)
|
|
|
|
Name
(please print or type)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Postal
Code / Zip Code
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daytime
Telephone Number
|
|
|
|
GUARANTEE
OF DELIVERY
The undersigned, an Eligible Institution, guarantees delivery to
the Depositary of the certificates representing the Common
Shares deposited hereby, in proper form for transfer with a
properly completed and duly executed Letter of Transmittal in
the form enclosed herewith or an originally signed facsimile
copy thereof, and all other documents required by the Letter of
Transmittal, all prior to 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on the
third trading day on the TSX after the Expiry Time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of the
Firm: _
_
|
|
Authorized
Signature: _
_
|
|
|
|
Address of the
Firm: _
_
|
|
Name: _
_
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: _
_
|
|
|
|
Telephone Number: _ _
|
|
Dated: _
_
|
exv99wxayx2y
This is an important document that requires your immediate
and careful review and consideration. If you are in doubt as to
how to respond to the Offer, you should consult with your
investment dealer, stockbroker, bank manager, lawyer or other
professional advisor. Inquiries concerning the information in
this document should be directed to Shell Canadas
Secretary at (403) 691-3111.
This Directors Circular, together with the RDS Circular
and related documents, are being sent to both registered and
non-registered owners of Shares. If you are a non-registered
owner and have received these documents directly from RDS or
Shell Canada, your name, address and information about your
holdings of Shares have been obtained in accordance with
applicable securities regulatory requirements from the
intermediary holding on your behalf.
SHELL CANADA LIMITED
DIRECTORS CIRCULAR
relating to the Offer by
SHELL INVESTMENTS LIMITED
a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of
ROYAL DUTCH SHELL plc
to purchase all of the common shares of
SHELL CANADA LIMITED
not already held by Shell Investments Limited or its affiliates
for
CDN$45.00 IN CASH PER COMMON SHARE
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF SHELL CANADA LIMITED RECOMMENDS
THAT SHAREHOLDERS ACCEPT THE OFFER AND TENDER THEIR
COMMON SHARES TO THE OFFER.
February 8, 2007
NOTICE TO UNITED STATES SECURITYHOLDERS
The Offer referred to herein is made for the securities of a
Canadian issuer and while the Offer and Directors Circular
are subject to Canadian disclosure requirements, Shareholders
should be aware that these requirements are different from those
of the United States. The enforcement by Shareholders of civil
liabilities under United States federal securities laws may be
adversely affected by the fact that Shell Canada is located in
Canada, a majority of its officers and directors are Canadian
residents and all or a substantial portion of the assets of
Shell Canada and said persons may be located outside of the
United States.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Directors Circular contains or references
forward-looking statements by Shell Canada that are
based on expectations, estimates and projections as of the date
of this Directors Circular. Forward-looking statements can
be identified by words such as anticipate,
believe, expect, plan,
intend, forecast, target,
project or similar words suggesting future outcomes
or statements regarding an outlook.
This cautionary statement expressly qualifies the
forward-looking statements by Shell Canada contained or referred
to in this Directors Circular. Readers are cautioned not
to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Although
Shell Canada believes that the expectations represented by such
forward-looking statements are reasonable based on the
information available to it on the date of this Directors
Circular, there can be no assurance that such expectations will
prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements involve numerous
assumptions, known and unknown risks, and uncertainties that may
cause Shell Canadas actual performance or results to
differ materially from any estimates or projections of future
performance or results expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. These assumptions, risks and
uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risks of the
oil and gas industry (including operating conditions and costs),
market competition, demand for oil, gas and related products,
disruptions in supply, project start-up, schedules and
execution, market competition, labour availability, material and
equipment shortages, constraints on infrastructure, the
uncertainties involving the geology of oil and gas deposits and
resources and reserves estimates, including the assumption that
the quantities estimated can be found and profitably produced in
the future, the receipt of regulatory approvals, stakeholder
engagement, the fulfillment of Shell Canadas sustainable
development criteria, fluctuations in oil and gas prices and
foreign currency exchange rates, general economic conditions,
changes in law or government policy, and other factors, many of
which are beyond the control of Shell Canada. These risks and
uncertainties also include the risks that the Offer will be
unsuccessful for any reason and the Offeror will not be able to
obtain the required approvals or clearances from regulatory
authorities on a timely basis, if at all, or will otherwise not
complete the Offer.
The forward-looking statements contained in this Directors
Circular are made as of the date hereof and Shell Canada does
not undertake any obligation to update publicly or to revise any
of the forward-looking statements contained or referenced in
this Directors Circular, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise, except as required by
law.
AVAILABILITY OF DISCLOSURE DOCUMENTS
Shell Canada is a reporting issuer or equivalent in all of the
provinces and territories of Canada and is a foreign private
issuer in the United States. It files its continuous disclosure
documents and other documents with Canadian and U.S. securities
regulatory authorities, and these documents can be found under
Shell Canadas profile at www.sedar.com and www.sec.gov.
CURRENCY
Unless otherwise indicated, all references to $ or
dollars in this Directors Circular refer to
Canadian dollars and references to US$ in this
Directors Circular refer to U.S. dollars.
CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE INFORMATION
The following table sets out the high and low exchange rates for
one U.S. dollar expressed in Canadian dollars for the period
indicated and the average of such exchange rates, and the
exchange rate at the end of such period, in each case, based
upon the closing rate of the Bank of Canada:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
High
|
|
|
1.1722 |
|
|
|
1.2696 |
|
|
|
1.3957 |
|
|
|
1.5672 |
|
Low
|
|
|
1.0983 |
|
|
|
1.1518 |
|
|
|
1.1759 |
|
|
|
1.2943 |
|
Rate at end of period
|
|
|
1.1654 |
|
|
|
1.1630 |
|
|
|
1.2020 |
|
|
|
1.2965 |
|
Average rate per period
|
|
|
1.1342 |
|
|
|
1.2116 |
|
|
|
1.3013 |
|
|
|
1.4009 |
|
On February 5, 2007, the exchange rate for one U.S. dollar
expressed in Canadian dollars based upon the noon rate of
exchange as reported by the Bank of Canada was $1.1818.
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
ii |
|
|
ii |
|
|
ii |
|
|
ii |
|
|
1 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
A-1 |
|
|
B-1 |
iii
DEFINITIONS
In this Directors Circular, the following terms shall
have the meanings set forth below, unless the subject matter or
context is inconsistent therewith or such terms are otherwise
defined in this Directors Circular.
affiliate has the meaning ascribed thereto in
the CBCA;
associate has the meaning ascribed thereto in
the Securities Act;
Board of Directors means the board of
directors of Shell Canada;
CBCA means the Canada Business
Corporations Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-44, as amended;
CIBC World Markets means CIBC World Markets
Inc.;
Deferred Share Unit or DSU
means a deferred share unit granted under the Deferred Share
Unit Plan for Non-Employee Directors and the Deferred Share Unit
Plan for Executive Officers of Shell Canada;
Directors Circular means this circular
of the Board of Directors relating to the Offer;
ESPP means the Employee Share Purchase Plan
of Shell Canada, as amended;
fair market value has the meaning ascribed
thereto in
Rule 61-501;
Fairness Opinion means the opinion of CIBC
World Markets dated as of January 22, 2007 and addressed to
the Special Committee (as defined herein) with respect to the
fairness, from a financial point of view, of the consideration
to be offered to Shareholders under the Offer (a complete copy
of which is attached as Schedule B to this Directors
Circular);
formal valuation means a valuation prepared
in accordance with the Rules;
LTIP means the Long Term Incentive Plan of
Shell Canada, as amended;
Minimum Condition means the condition of the
Offer which requires that there shall have been validly
deposited or tendered under the Offer and not withdrawn a number
of Shares which constitutes at least a majority of the aggregate
number of outstanding Shares (including, for this purpose,
Shares underlying any Options or other rights to acquire Shares
that are exercisable immediately prior to the Expiry
Time (as defined in the RDS Circular)) not currently owned
by the Offeror and its affiliates and the votes attaching to
which shall be qualified to be included as votes in favour of
any Subsequent Acquisition Transaction (as defined
in the RDS Circular) in determining whether minority approval
(as construed under applicable securities laws) has been
obtained in respect thereof;
Offer means the offer by the Offeror dated
February 8, 2007 to purchase all of the Shares not already
held by the Offeror or its affiliates at the Offer Price;
Offer Price means $45.00 in cash per Share;
Offeror means Shell Investments Limited, a
corporation incorporated under the CBCA;
Option Proposal means the option proposal,
the terms of which are set out in a letter agreement between the
Offeror and Shell Canada dated January 23, 2007, relating
to the making of an offer to holders of Options to exchange such
Options for RDS Replacement Options;
Options means options to purchase Shares
(including tandem share appreciation rights) granted pursuant to
the LTIP;
RDS means Royal Dutch Shell plc, a
corporation existing under the laws of England and Wales;
RDS Circular means the offer to purchase and
accompanying take-over bid circular of the Offeror dated
February 8, 2007 setting forth the terms and conditions of
the Offer;
RDS Replacement Options means options issued
by Shell Canada Options Corporation entitling the holder to
acquire Class A ordinary shares of RDS which, in accordance
with the Option Proposal, are to be substantially similar to the
terms of the Options for which they are exchanged, other than
the securities for which they are exercisable;
Regulation Q-27
means the Autorité des marchés financiers
(Québec)
Regulation Q-27
Respecting Protection of Minority Securityholders in the Course
of Certain Transactions;
Rule 61-501
means Ontario Securities Commission
Rule 61-501
Insider Bids, Issuer Bids, Business Combinations and Related
Party Transactions;
1
Rules means, collectively,
Rule 61-501 and
Regulation Q-27;
Securities Act means the Securities Act
(Ontario), R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, as amended;
SEDAR means the System for Electronic
Document Analysis and Retrieval;
Shareholder means a holder of Shares other
than the Offeror or its affiliates;
Shares means the common shares in the capital
of Shell Canada including the common shares issued or issuable
upon the exercise of outstanding Options;
Shell Canada means Shell Canada Limited, a
corporation incorporated under the CBCA;
subsidiary has the meaning ascribed thereto
in the CBCA;
Support Agreement means the support agreement
between the Offeror and Shell Canada dated January 23,
2007, together with a related letter agreement concerning the
Option Proposal (unless the context otherwise requires);
TSX means the Toronto Stock Exchange; and
Valuation means the valuation of the Shares
dated as of January 22, 2007, prepared by CIBC World
Markets and addressed to the Special Committee (as defined
herein) (a complete copy of which is attached as Schedule A
to this Directors Circular).
2
DIRECTORS CIRCULAR
This Directors Circular is issued by the Board of
Directors of Shell Canada in connection with the Offer by the
Offeror to purchase all of the issued and outstanding Shares not
already held by the Offeror or its affiliates (including all
Shares which may become outstanding after the date of the Offer
pursuant to the exercise of Options) at a price of $45.00 in
cash for each Share, upon the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth in the RDS Circular. The Offer expires at
8:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on March 16, 2007 unless the Offer
is withdrawn or extended by the Offeror. The Offer was made
pursuant to the terms of the Support Agreement, the key terms of
which are summarized below under Support Agreement.
Reference should be made to the RDS Circular for full details
and the terms and conditions of the Offer.
BACKGROUND TO THE OFFER
RDS is Shell Canadas majority shareholder and holds,
indirectly through the Offeror and its affiliates, approximately
78% of the outstanding Shares.
On Friday, October 20, 2006, Mr. Jeroen van der Veer,
the Chief Executive of RDS, telephoned Mr. Derek Burney,
O.C., Lead Director of Shell Canada, and advised him that RDS
was prepared to make an offer to Shareholders to acquire the
Shares not owned by RDS or its affiliates at a price of $40.00
per Share. Mr. van der Veer indicated that RDS would be
providing a letter to the Board of Directors setting out the
terms of the proposal. On the same day, after the close of
markets in Canada, RDS provided a letter to the Board of
Directors setting out the terms of its proposal (the
Proposal). Mr. van der Veer then telephoned
Mr. Clive Mather, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Shell Canada, and advised him of the Proposal.
The Proposal provided that RDS would be prepared to make an
offer to Shareholders to acquire their Shares at a price of
$40.00, payable in cash. The Proposal provided that RDS expected
that the offer would be made by way of take-over bid circular
and that Shell Canada would enter into a support agreement with
RDS or an affiliate. The Proposal further provided that the
offer would be conditional on more than 50% of the Shares held
by Shareholders being tendered, as well as other customary
conditions. The Proposal also provided that there would be a
condition that RDS shall have determined (or shall have been
satisfied by Shell Canada) that no covenant or condition exists
in any agreement or instrument of Shell Canada that would make
it inadvisable for RDS to proceed. The letter from Mr. van der
Veer also requested that the Board of Directors establish a
special committee of independent directors to supervise the
preparation of a formal independent valuation and make a
recommendation with respect to the proposed offer and undertook
to pay the costs of the valuation. Finally, the letter indicated
that it was RDS desire to proceed with a transaction
supported by the Board of Directors and RDS expressly reserved
the right not to proceed with making an offer to Shareholders if
it was unable to obtain the support of the Board of Directors.
On October 21, 2006, the Board of Directors (other than
Messrs Routs and Odum) met to discuss the Proposal and
established a special committee (the Special
Committee) of independent directors of Shell Canada
consisting of Derek Burney, Kerry Hawkins, David Kerr, Ron
Osborne and Nancy Southern to consider and evaluate the
Proposal. Ms. Southern resigned from the Special Committee
on October 28, 2006 for personal reasons. The mandate of
the Special Committee included (i) examining and reviewing
the Proposal, (ii) negotiating with RDS the terms,
conditions, structure and other matters relating to the
Proposal, (iii) acting as the primary point of contact for
Shell Canada in respect of contacts made by RDS in connection
with the Proposal, and (iv) advising the Board of Directors
as to what recommendation should be made to Shareholders in
respect of the Proposal. Additionally, as any offer from RDS
would constitute an insider bid for the purposes of
Rule 61-501 and
Regulation Q-27,
the responsibilities of the Special Committee included selecting
and retaining a qualified and independent valuator and
supervising the preparation of a formal valuation of the Shares.
Mr. Burney was appointed Chair of the Special Committee.
On Monday, October 23, 2006, prior to the opening of
markets in Canada, RDS and Shell Canada each issued a press
release announcing the Proposal and the formation of the Special
Committee, respectively.
The mandate of the Special Committee authorized it to retain
legal and financial advisors. The Special Committee engaged
Ogilvy Renault LLP to serve as legal counsel to the Special
Committee. Ogilvy Renault LLP confirmed to the Special Committee
that as any offer by RDS to acquire additional Shares in Shell
Canada by way of take-over bid circular would constitute an
insider bid, the Special Committee was required to
select an independent valuator and to supervise the preparation
of a formal valuation in accordance with
Rule 61-501 and
Regulation Q-27.
3
The Special Committee retained CIBC World Markets as its
financial advisor with the responsibility to, among other
things: (i) prepare and deliver to the Special Committee a
formal valuation of the Shares; (ii) prepare and deliver to
the Special Committee one or more written opinions as to the
adequacy or fairness, from a financial point of view, of the
consideration offered to Shareholders pursuant to the Proposal
or any variation thereof; and (iii) provide other financial
advisory services related to the Proposal or any variation
thereof. In retaining CIBC World Markets, the Special Committee,
based in part on certain representations made to it by CIBC
World Markets, concluded that CIBC World Markets was independent
and qualified to provide a formal valuation of the Shares and
provide a fairness opinion with respect to the Proposal.
The Special Committee met as a committee 15 times in person or
by telephone. The Special Committee undertook a review of the
Proposal and obtained the advice of its legal and financial
advisors for such purpose. The Special Committee also considered
correspondence received by it and Shell Canada from various
Shareholders with respect to the Proposal as well as the views
conveyed to it by or on behalf of Shareholders.
To ensure that CIBC World Markets received all of the
information necessary to prepare the Valuation and the Fairness
Opinion, the Special Committee instructed Shell Canada to grant
CIBC World Markets full access to senior management and to
provide all necessary information concerning Shell Canadas
business, operations, assets, financial condition, reserves,
production, expansion plans, operating results and prospects. To
this end, Shell Canada assembled this information for CIBC World
Markets and organized regular meetings between members of its
management and CIBC World Markets representatives. CIBC World
Markets confirmed to the Special Committee that it received from
management of Shell Canada all information it requested.
CIBC World Markets provided regular updates to the Special
Committee with respect to its progress and the various
methodologies and assumptions to be utilized in its
determination of the fair market value of the Shares for the
purpose of the Valuation.
On November 6, 2006, the Special Committee met to consider
a request from RDS for access to certain confidential
information of Shell Canada for the purpose of conducting due
diligence in respect of the Proposal. In response to this
request, the Special Committee directed Shell Canada to provide
RDS with the same information that had been provided to CIBC
World Markets for the preparation of the Valuation and the
Fairness Opinion, subject to the execution by RDS and Shell
Canada of a confidentiality agreement satisfactory to the
Special Committee. On December 4, 2006, following the
negotiation and execution of a confidentiality agreement, RDS
was provided with access to this information.
On December 5, 2006, representatives of CIBC World Markets
made a presentation to the Special Committee outlining CIBC
World Markets preliminary views with respect to the fair
market value of the Shares. The presentation included a
description of the review and analysis carried out by CIBC World
Markets to date and the approaches being taken to value the
Shares, including valuation methodologies and assumptions. Based
on CIBC World Markets preliminary view on value, the
Special Committee concluded that $40.00 per Share would likely
be below the range of values to be provided by CIBC World
Markets in the Valuation.
On December 6, 2006, Mr. Burney informed Adrian
Loader, Director Strategy and Business Development
of RDS, that, based upon preliminary results of the valuation
work being performed by CIBC World Markets, the Special
Committee would be unable to recommend to the Board of Directors
that it recommend the Proposal to Shareholders and that $40.00
was below the offer price that the Special Committee would be
prepared to recommend to the Board of Directors. Mr. Burney
also advised Mr. Loader that, given the price at which the
Shares were trading on the TSX, the market did not view $40.00
per Share as sufficient. Mr. Burney suggested that, given
the divergent views on value that appeared to be developing
between the Special Committee and RDS, it would be helpful for
the Special Committee and RDS to establish a dialogue between
CIBC World Markets and RDS financial advisors.
On December 8, 2006, Mr. Loader called Mr. Burney
and suggested that the financial advisors from RDS and Shell
Canada meet in Calgary on December 14, 2006.
Mr. Loader indicated that, based on RDS due diligence
investigations, RDS saw nothing that would suggest that the
Proposal did not represent full and fair value. Mr. Loader also
suggested that it may be useful to have a meeting between the
respective members of management of RDS and Shell Canada most
familiar with oil and gas assets to continue a dialogue.
On December 14, 2006, representatives of CIBC World Markets
met with the financial advisors to RDS to discuss various issues
relating to valuation methodologies and assumptions. Subsequent
to this meeting, the financial advisors to RDS delivered a
letter to CIBC World Markets reaffirming their view that the
Proposal represented full and fair
4
value for the Shares and setting out differences in opinion with
respect to the appropriateness of assumptions being used by
Shell Canada in its projections and plans and the economic
assumptions proposed by CIBC World Markets in preparing the
formal valuation. At the request of the Special Committee, CIBC
World Markets provided a response to this letter to RDS
financial advisors clarifying certain of its assumptions and
inputs.
On December 15, 2006, Mr. Burney discussed the
December 14, 2006 meeting of financial advisors with
Mr. Loader, at which time Mr. Loader indicated that
RDS had thoroughly considered the value of the Shares and
expressed disagreement with what RDS viewed as an overly
optimistic approach taken by Shell Canada in its projections and
plans and by CIBC World Markets in assessing the fair market
value of the Shares. Mr. Burney indicated that it was up to
RDS to take the next step in advancing the process, given that
the Special Committee had concluded it would be unable to
support a price of $40.00 per Share. Mr. Burney suggested
that it might be useful for members of RDS management to meet
with members of Shell Canada management to discuss Shell
Canadas business plans, as had been previously suggested
by Mr. Loader.
On December 21, 2006, Mr. Loader called
Mr. Burney and suggested that, since RDS and the Special
Committee continued to have significant differences of opinion
on value, it would be helpful to organize a meeting to be held
early in 2007 between the appropriate representatives from RDS
and Shell Canada management, CIBC World Markets and the
financial advisors to RDS. Mr. Burney agreed with this
approach and directed Shell Canada to prepare for this meeting.
On January 9, 2007, Mr. Loader, together with other
representatives of RDS and its financial advisors, met with
representatives of Shell Canada and CIBC World Markets. At that
meeting, Shell Canada representatives presented information
covering several key areas of Shell Canadas business
plans. CIBC World Markets and the financial advisors to RDS then
met separately on that same day to discuss valuation assumptions
and methodologies.
On January 10, 2007, Mr. Burney met with
Mr. Loader about the January 9, 2007 meeting.
Mr. Loader acknowledged that the meeting had been useful,
however he reiterated his view with respect to the Proposal and
indicated that nothing RDS had learned would change this view.
Mr. Burney advised Mr. Loader of the Special
Committees concern regarding the length of the process and
the possible negative impact the uncertainty created by the
Proposal may have on employee morale and the operations of Shell
Canada.
On January 11, 2007, RDS sent an email to Shell Canada
detailing a number of follow-up questions stemming from the
January 9 meeting to which Shell Canada replied by email on
January 15, 2007.
On January 18, 2007, Mr. Loader contacted
Mr. Burney and stated that, in the interests of advancing
the Proposal, RDS was prepared to discuss, on an exploratory
basis, a possible increase in the consideration under the
Proposal of up to $43.50 per Share. The Special Committee met on
January 18, 2007 to consider this development and sought
the view of CIBC World Markets as to whether $43.50 per Share
would be within the range of fair market values developed by it
for the Valuation. CIBC World Markets confirmed that it expected
that $43.50 per Share would be within its expected value range
(especially in light of recent oil price fluctuations), but
would be at the low end of the range. The Special Committee,
after considering advice from its financial and legal advisors,
concluded that Mr. Burney should advise Mr. Loader
that the Special Committee would not support an offer by RDS at
a price of $43.50 per Share.
Mr. Burney called Mr. Loader on January 19, 2007
and advised Mr. Loader of the Special Committees
conclusion. Mr. Loader replied that RDS might be willing to
offer $44.50 per Share provided the offer was supported by the
Special Committee and the Board of Directors. The Special
Committee met on January 19, 2006 and determined, after
considering advice from its financial and legal advisors, that
it should advise RDS that it would not support any offer less
than $45.00 per Share. Mr. Burney communicated this to
Mr. Loader later that day. Mr. Loader reiterated that
RDS was not prepared to move beyond $44.50 per Share, and it was
determined that no further action could be taken by
Mr. Burney or Mr. Loader at that time.
On January 21, 2007, Mr. Loader called Mr. Burney
and stated that RDS would be willing to offer $44.75 per Share.
The Special Committee met later that day to consider this
development. After discussions with CIBC World Markets as to
CIBC World Markets views on the range of values for the
Shares, the Special Committee determined that it should
re-affirm to RDS that it would not be willing to recommend
support of a price of less than $45.00 per Share.
Mr. Burney conveyed this message to Mr. Loader
by email.
On January 22, 2007, Mr. Loader called Mr. Burney
and advised him that RDS would be willing to increase the price
under the Proposal to $45.00 per Share on the condition that the
Special Committee and the Board of Directors recommend the
transaction and that Shell Canada enter into a support agreement
acceptable to RDS, a draft of which
5
would be provided by RDS. Throughout the day, the legal advisors
to the Special Committee and the legal officers of Shell Canada
negotiated the terms of the Support Agreement with RDS, with the
exception of the price per Share which remained under
consideration by the Special Committee.
At a meeting of the Special Committee held during the evening of
January 22, 2007, after the close of markets in Canada, the
Special Committee received the verbal opinion of CIBC World
Markets that the consideration of $45.00 per Share to be offered
to Shareholders under the Offer would be fair, from a financial
point of view, to Shareholders and would likely be near the
midpoint of the expected value range. The Special Committee
unanimously resolved to recommend to the Board of Directors that
the Board of Directors recommend that Shareholders accept the
Offer. The Special Committee also reviewed the general terms of
the Support Agreement and, subject to the comments of the
Special Committee, unanimously resolved to recommend that the
Board of Directors authorize Shell Canada to enter into the
Support Agreement subject to such final terms being agreed
between the parties.
At a meeting of the Board of Directors held later that evening,
the Board of Directors received the recommendations from the
Special Committee that the Board of Directors recommend that
Shareholders accept the Offer and authorize Shell Canada to
enter into the Support Agreement. CIBC World Markets confirmed
to the Board of Directors that it had provided to the Special
Committee a verbal opinion that the Offer Price to be offered to
Shareholders under the Offer was fair, from a financial point of
view, to Shareholders and would likely be near the midpoint of
the expected value range. With Messrs Marvin E. Odum and Rob J.
Routs (members of the Board of Directors who are also officers
of RDS or its affiliates) and Mr. Clive Mather (the
President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of Shell
Canada) abstaining, the Board of Directors resolved, with all
other attending members of the Board of Directors voting in
favour of the resolution, to recommend that Shareholders accept
the Offer and authorized the entering into of the Support
Agreement. Ms. Ida Goodreau and Ms. Nancy Southern
were not present at the meeting of the Board of Directors, but
confirmed their support for the Boards decision following
the meeting.
Early in the morning of January 23, 2007, representatives
of the Special Committee, Shell Canada and the Offeror finalized
and executed the Support Agreement. Immediately thereafter, RDS
and Shell Canada each issued a press release announcing the
Offer, the support of the Offer by the Special Committee and the
Board of Directors and the entering into of the Support
Agreement.
On February 2, 2007, the Special Committee met to receive
the Valuation and the Fairness Opinion and unanimously resolved
to recommend that the Board of Directors approve the contents of
this Directors Circular and the sending of it to
Shareholders. Later that same day, the Board of Directors met to
receive the recommendation of the Special Committee and with
Messrs Odum, Routs and Mather abstaining, all attending
directors voted unanimously to approve the contents of this
Directors Circular and the sending of it to Shareholders.
RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPECIAL
COMMITTEE AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Special Committee has unanimously concluded that the
Offer is fair to Shareholders and has recommended that the Board
of Directors recommend that Shareholders accept the Offer and
tender their Shares to the Offer. The Board of Directors has
unanimously concluded (subject to the abstentions referred to
below) that, based on the recommendations of the Special
Committee and the factors referred to below, the Offer is fair
to Shareholders and recommends that Shareholders accept the
Offer and tender their Shares to the Offer. The Board of
Directors has approved the entering into of the Support
Agreement, which requires the making of the Offer by the
Offeror.
Mr. Routs, an officer of RDS, Mr. Odum, an officer of
an affiliate of RDS, and Mr. Mather, the President and
Chief Executive Officer of Shell Canada, declared their
respective interests and refrained from voting in respect of the
resolution of the Board of Directors concluding that the Offer
is fair to Shareholders and recommending that Shareholders
accept the Offer.
The conclusion and recommendation of the Special Committee and
the Board of Directors are based on the following factors, among
others:
|
|
|
|
|
the Offer Price is at the midpoint of the fair market value
range for the Shares of $42 to $48 per Share as determined by
CIBC World Markets in the Valuation (See Valuation and
Fairness Opinion below); |
6
|
|
|
|
|
the opinion of CIBC World Markets that, as of January 22,
2007, the consideration to be offered to Shareholders under the
Offer is fair, from a financial point of view, to Shareholders
(See Valuation and Fairness Opinion below); |
|
|
|
the Offer Price represents a substantial premium (of
approximately 37.2%) over the closing trading price of the
Shares on the TSX on October 20, 2006, the last trading day
immediately preceding the announcements by RDS and Shell Canada
of the Proposal, and a premium of 45.4% over the closing trading
price of the Shares on the TSX on September 22, 2006, the
trading day 30 calendar days prior to such announcement; |
|
|
|
the consideration offered under the Offer is cash, which
provides Shareholders with an opportunity to immediately realize
value for their Shares, especially when viewed against the risks
inherent in any long term business plan (including, in the case
of Shell Canada, risks associated with fluctuations in oil and
gas prices, operating conditions and costs, demand for oil and
receipt of regulatory approvals); |
|
|
|
if the Offer is not successful, trading prices for the Shares on
the TSX may decline significantly; |
|
|
|
the fact that, given RDS shareholdings in Shell Canada,
there is no practical prospect of a competing offer for the
Shares by a third party; |
|
|
|
the active arms-length negotiations between the Special
Committee and RDS, which resulted in the Offer Price being
increased from $40.00 per Share to $45.00 per Share; and |
|
|
|
in the case of the Board of Directors, the Special Committee
process, including the retention of Ogilvy Renault LLP as
independent legal advisors and CIBC World Markets as independent
valuator and the recommendation of the Special Committee. |
The Special Committee and the Board of Directors also considered
that, if the Board of Directors did not agree to recommend the
Offer to Shareholders pursuant to the Support Agreement and RDS
or the Offeror decided not to make an offer to Shareholders,
Shareholders would not have the opportunity to consider a cash
offer at a premium to market. Further, if RDS or the Offeror
were to make an offer directly to Shareholders without the
recommendation of the Special Committee and the Board of
Directors, it may have been at a price less than the price
negotiated by the Special Committee. While the Special Committee
and the Board of Directors believe each of the factors set out
above supported its decision to recommend that Shareholders
accept the Offer, the Special Committee and the Board of
Directors also recognize that if the Offer is successfully
completed, it will eliminate the opportunity for current
Shareholders to participate in the longer term potential
benefits of the business of Shell Canada to the extent that
those benefits exceed those potential benefits reflected in the
Offer Price.
In arriving at its recommendation, the Special Committee
considered the current market price of the Shares on the TSX,
the historical market prices for the Shares, and the
information, data and conclusions contained in the Valuation and
the Fairness Opinion. Given that the Special Committee received
the Valuation and the advice of CIBC World Markets contained
therein as to the most appropriate valuation methodologies for
the Shares, it did not specifically consider other valuation
measurements such as net book value, going concern value or
liquidation value, except to the extent such measurements are
dealt with or otherwise reflected in the Valuation.
The foregoing discussion of the factors reviewed by the Special
Committee and the Board of Directors is not intended to be
exhaustive. In view of the wide variety of factors considered in
connection with their evaluation of the Offer, the Special
Committee and the Board of Directors did not find it practicable
to, and therefore did not, quantify or assign relative weights
to specific factors or methodologies in reaching its conclusion.
In addition, individual members of the Special Committee and the
Board of Directors may have given different weights to different
factors.
Shareholders should consider the Offer carefully and come to
their own conclusions as to whether to accept or reject the
Offer. Shareholders who are in doubt as to how to respond should
consult with their own investment dealer, stockbroker, bank
manager, lawyer or other professional advisor. Shareholders are
advised that acceptance of the Offer may have tax consequences
and they should consult their own professional tax advisors.
7
VALUATION AND FAIRNESS OPINION
Selection of CIBC World Markets
As discussed under Background to the Offer above,
the Offer constitutes an insider bid for the
purposes of the Rules. In accordance with the provisions of the
Rules, the Offeror was required to obtain, at its own expense, a
formal valuation of the Shares prepared in accordance with the
Rules by a valuator who is independent of RDS and the Offeror
and who is qualified to provide such a valuation. Under the
Rules, the Special Committee was required to:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
determine who the valuator would be; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
supervise the preparation of the formal valuation of the Shares;
and |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
use its best efforts to ensure that the formal valuation was
completed and provided to the Offeror in a timely manner. |
In the Proposal, RDS requested that the Board of Directors
establish a special committee of independent directors to
supervise the preparation of a formal valuation and undertook to
pay the costs of the formal valuation. Accordingly, the Special
Committee considered who should be invited to submit a proposal
to prepare the formal valuation and act as financial advisor to
the Special Committee. The Special Committee considered a number
of potential valuators and ultimately invited CIBC World Markets
to make such a proposal. CIBC World Markets submitted such a
proposal indicating, among other things, its qualifications to
prepare a formal valuation. The Special Committee met with
representatives of CIBC World Markets for the purposes of
reviewing their proposal and made enquires of them as to CIBC
World Markets qualifications and independence.
After deliberation, the Special Committee determined, based in
part on certain representations made to it by CIBC World
Markets, that CIBC World Markets was independent and qualified
to prepare a formal valuation and should be retained as
financial advisor to the Special Committee for the purposes of,
among other things, preparing and delivering to the Special
Committee a formal valuation of the Shares and an opinion as to
the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the
consideration offered to Shareholders under the Proposal or any
variation thereof. Accordingly, the Special Committee directed
Shell Canada to enter into an engagement letter with CIBC World
Markets to this effect. Shell Canada entered into such an
engagement letter (the Engagement Letter) with CIBC
World Markets dated October 28, 2006 which provided, among
other things, that the services of CIBC World Markets would be
provided under the supervision and direction of the Special
Committee.
The Engagement Letter provides for the payment of fees to CIBC
World Markets of $250,000 as an engagement and work fee upon
execution of the Engagement Letter, $1,500,000 upon delivery to
the Special Committee of a preliminary value analysis of the
Shares, $3,000,000 upon delivery to the Special Committee of the
Valuation, $1,000,000 upon delivery to the Special Committee of
the Fairness Opinion and $250,000 for each subsequent opinion
requested by the Special Committee as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the consideration under an offer to
Shareholders. The fees to be paid to CIBC World Markets under
the Engagement Letter were agreed between CIBC World Markets and
the Special Committee. None of the fees payable to CIBC World
Markets are contingent upon the conclusions reached by CIBC
World Markets in the Valuation or Fairness Opinion or on the
completion of the Offer. In the Engagement Letter, Shell Canada
has agreed to indemnify CIBC World Markets in respect of certain
liabilities that might arise out of its engagement and to
reimburse it for its reasonable expenses.
The Valuation
The following summary is qualified in its entirety by the full
text of the Valuation which sets forth the assumptions made,
matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken in
connection with the Valuation, and which is included as
Schedule A to this Directors Circular. The Board
of Directors urges Shareholders to read the Valuation in its
entirety.
Credentials of CIBC World Markets
CIBC World Markets is one of Canadas largest investment
banking firms with operations in all facets of corporate and
government finance, mergers and acquisitions, equity and fixed
income sales and trading and investment research. The Valuation
and Fairness Opinion have been approved for release by a
committee of CIBC World Markets managing directors and internal
counsel, each of whom is experienced in merger, acquisition,
divestiture and valuation matters.
8
Relationships with Interested Parties
None of CIBC World Markets or its affiliates:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
is an issuer insider, associated entity
or affiliated entity of RDS or the Offeror as such
terms are used in
Rule 61-501; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
is a financial advisor to RDS or the Offeror in connection with
the Offer; |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
is a manager or co-manager of a soliciting dealer group formed
to solicit acceptances of the Offer or will it, as a member of
such group, perform services beyond the customary soliciting
dealers functions nor will it receive more than the per
share or per shareholder fee payable to other members of the
group; or |
|
|
|
|
(d) |
has a financial incentive with respect to the conclusions
reached in the Valuation or the Fairness Opinion nor has a
material financial interest in the completion of the Offer. |
Prior to entering into the Engagement Letter, CIBC World Markets
has provided various financial advisory services to Shell Canada
in connection with transactions unrelated to the Offer. CIBC
World Markets acts as a trader and dealer, both as principal and
agent, in major financial markets and, as such, may have had,
and may in the future have, positions in the securities of Shell
Canada, RDS or their affiliates and, from time to time, may have
executed, or may execute, transactions on behalf of such
entities. The fees payable to CIBC World Markets pursuant to the
Engagement Letter and received by CIBC World Markets from Shell
Canada and its affiliates are not financially material to CIBC
World Markets. CIBC World Markets is an indirect subsidiary of
the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) and
CIBC or its affiliated entities have made or may in the future
make loans or provide other financial services in the normal
course to Shell Canada, RDS or their affiliates. No
understandings or agreements exist between CIBC World Markets,
RDS or the Offeror with respect to future financial advisory or
investment banking business.
Scope of Review
In preparing the Valuation, CIBC World Markets reviewed certain
publicly available information and financial statements and
non-public information relating to Shell Canada; reviewed
information relating to the business, operations, financial
performance and, where applicable, stock market data and
research publications relating to Shell Canada and other
selected comparable companies; held discussions with senior
management of Shell Canada; held discussions with independent
reservoir engineers and other industry experts; held discussions
with RDS and its financial advisors; held discussions with legal
counsel to the Special Committee; and carried out other
investigative exercises, more specifically described in the
Valuation.
General Assumption and Limitations
With the Special Committees permission and subject to the
exercise of CIBC World Markets professional judgment, CIBC
World Markets relied upon the completeness, accuracy and fair
presentation of all data and other information obtained by it
from public sources or provided to it by Shell Canada or its
advisors or otherwise obtained by it. The Valuation is
conditional upon such completeness, accuracy and fair
presentation. Except as provided in the Valuation, CIBC World
Markets did not attempt to verify independently the accuracy,
completeness or fairness of presentation of any of such data or
information. Shell Canada has represented to CIBC World Markets
in a certificate of two senior officers of Shell Canada dated
the date of the Valuation that, among other things, the
information, data and other materials provided to CIBC World
Markets by or on behalf of Shell Canada (the Shell Canada
Information), were complete and correct at the date the
Shell Canada Information was provided to CIBC World Markets and
that, since the date of the Shell Canada Information, there has
been no material change, financial or otherwise, in the
financial condition, assets, liabilities (contingent or
otherwise), business, operations or prospects of Shell Canada
and its subsidiaries and no material change has occurred in the
Shell Canada Information or any part thereof which would have or
which would reasonably be expected to have a material effect on
the Valuation or the Fairness Opinion.
The Valuation was given as of January 22, 2007 on the basis
of securities markets, economic and general business and
financial conditions prevailing on that date and the condition
and prospects, financial and otherwise, of Shell Canada as they
were reflected in the Shell Canada Information provided to CIBC
World Markets and as they were represented to CIBC World Markets
in their discussions with management of Shell Canada and its
advisors. Although CIBC World Markets reserves the right to
change or withdraw the Valuation if it learns that any of the
information
9
relied upon in preparing the Valuation was inaccurate,
incomplete or misleading in any material respect, CIBC World
Markets disclaims any obligation to change or withdraw the
Valuation, to advise any person of any change that may come to
its attention, or update the Valuation after such date. In
preparing the Valuation, CIBC World Markets was not authorized
to solicit, and did not solicit, interest from any other
potential party with respect to the acquisition of Shares or any
business combinations or other extraordinary transaction
involving Shell Canada. The Valuation is not to be construed as
a recommendation to any Shareholder to accept or reject the
Offer.
In the Valuation, CIBC World Markets stated that it believes
that its financial analyses must be considered as a whole and
that selecting portions of its analyses and the factors
considered by it, without considering all factors and analyses
together, could create a misleading view of the process
underlying the Valuation. The preparation of a valuation is
complex and is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis
or summary description and any attempt to do so could lead to
undue emphasis on any particular factor or analysis.
Fair Market Value
For purposes of the Valuation, fair market value is defined as
the monetary consideration that, in an open and unrestricted
market, a prudent and informed buyer would pay to a prudent and
informed seller, each acting at arms length with the other
and under no compulsion to act. CIBC World Markets made no
downward adjustment to the fair market value of the Shares to
reflect the liquidity of the Shares, the effect of the
transaction on the Shares or the fact that the Shares do not
form part of a controlling interest. Consequently, the Valuation
provides a conclusion on a per Share basis with respect to Shell
Canadas en bloc value, being the price at
which all of the Shares could be sold to one or more buyers at
the same time.
Valuation Methodology
CIBC World Markets approached the valuation of the Shares by
applying two principal methodologies:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
a discounted cash flow (DCF) approach; and |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
a sum of the parts net asset value (NAV)
approach. |
In addition, CIBC World Markets reviewed historical trading data
for Shell Canada, bid premia from precedent transactions and
research analyst target prices.
CIBC World Markets prepared a comprehensive DCF analysis of
Shell Canada to assist in determining the fair market value of
the Shares. CIBC World Markets believed that the DCF approach
was the most appropriate methodology for estimating the en
bloc value of Shell Canada and benchmarked the results
against other valuation methodologies. CIBC World Markets
further believed that the DCF approach is the most broadly used
valuation methodology in the oil and gas industry. The DCF
approach reflects the growth prospects and risks inherent in
Shell Canadas operations by taking into account the future
free cash flow generating capability of its assets.
The present value of the unlevered after-tax free cash flows
derived from the DCF analysis represents the aggregate value of
Shell Canadas operating assets. To arrive at an equity
value, and subsequently an equity value per Share, CIBC World
Markets made a number of adjustments. These adjustments
included, among other things, adjustments for net debt as of
December 31, 2006, potential future tax deferred benefits,
certain inventory adjustments, present value of unfunded pension
liabilities and the estimated present value of future asset
retirement obligations not already reflected in the DCF analysis.
10
The following summary table of CIBC World Markets
weighted DCF analysis is taken from the Valuation. Terms
used in the table are defined in the Valuation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
Cost of Capital | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8.5% | |
|
8.0% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ millions, except per | |
|
|
Share amounts) | |
Present Value of Free Cash
Flow(1)
|
|
$ |
36,925 |
|
|
$ |
41,449 |
|
Less: Debt and Working Capital
Deficit(2)
|
|
$ |
(1,911 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,911 |
) |
Plus: Option
Proceeds(3)
|
|
$ |
520 |
|
|
$ |
520 |
|
|
Other
Adjustments(4)
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Equity Value
|
|
$ |
35,628 |
|
|
$ |
40,152 |
|
Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding (mm)
|
|
|
847.0 |
|
|
|
847.0 |
|
Estimated DCF Value per Share
|
|
$ |
42.06 |
|
|
$ |
47.40 |
|
Notes:
|
|
(1) |
Based on weighted average of Proven Case (15%), Expected Case
(70%), and Upside Case (15%). |
|
(2) |
As per December 31, 2006 unaudited financials of Shell
Canada. |
|
(3) |
Source: Shell Canada option schedule. |
|
(4) |
Includes unfunded pension liability, asset retirement
obligations and certain inventory adjustments. |
The equity value per Share derived from the DCF analysis was
determined to be in the range of approximately $42 to $47.
Using the NAV approach, a value for Shell Canada was estimated
by separately considering the value of each operating,
development, exploration and financial asset. The individual
asset values were estimated utilizing primarily precedent
transaction and comparable company trading analyses.
The market trading multiples of public companies that operate in
businesses similar to those of Shell Canada were reviewed and
used to estimate individual asset values. The multiples used
included measures of (i) total enterprise value
(TEV) to earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) referred to
as TEV/ EBITDA, (ii) Adjusted TEV to the
quantity of net proved reserves, and (iii) Adjusted TEV to
barrels per day of net current production. Each of these
multiples is frequently observed by industry participants and
the investment community as key measures for valuing assets or
companies in various sectors of the oil and gas industry.
The results of the comparable companies approach were adjusted
for a premium based on comparable change-of-control transactions
to reflect an en bloc value for each of the assets.
CIBC World Markets applied premia to TEV in its analysis for the
various assets given that Shell Canadas net debt is held
at the corporate level and not allocated to any particular asset
or division. CIBC World Markets reviewed both the premia to
market trading values for shares and premia to TEV of a number
of precedent transactions in the Canadian oil and gas industry
and for other large Canadian acquisition transactions to
determine appropriate premia with regard to Shell Canadas
assets.
Under the NAV approach, the value of each asset was summed to
produce a total asset value. The present value of Shell
Canadas Go to Market cost savings, as well as
the proceeds from the exercise of stock options and other
employee stock incentive plans were added to this value. Shell
Canadas net debt (long term debt plus working capital
deficit) and an estimate of the present value of corporate
expenses that are not directly assignable to each of the
individual assets were deducted from these values in order to
arrive at an equity value per Share.
11
The following summary table of CIBC World Markets
NAV analysis is taken from the Valuation. Terms used in the
table are defined in the Valuation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ millions, except per | |
|
|
Share data) | |
Athabasca Oil Sands Project
|
|
$ |
20,102 |
|
|
$ |
21,777 |
|
Other Oil Sands
|
|
|
3,412 |
|
|
|
3,785 |
|
Exploration and Production
|
|
|
5,791 |
|
|
|
7,119 |
|
Oil Products
|
|
|
6,390 |
|
|
|
8,147 |
|
Go to Market Cost Savings
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
Frontier and Undeveloped Land
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
Unallocated Corporate G&A
|
|
|
(690 |
) |
|
|
(765 |
) |
Option
Proceeds(1)
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value
|
|
$ |
37,489 |
|
|
$ |
42,933 |
|
Less: Net Debt (December 31, 2006)
|
|
|
(1,911 |
) |
|
|
(1,911 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Value
|
|
$ |
35,578 |
|
|
$ |
41,022 |
|
Shares Outstanding (fully-diluted)
|
|
|
847.0 |
|
|
|
847.0 |
|
Equity Value per Share
|
|
$ |
42.00 |
|
|
$ |
48.43 |
|
Note:
|
|
(1) |
Source: Shell Canada option schedule. |
The NAV analysis indicated an equity value range of
approximately $42 to $48 per Share.
Distinctive Material Benefits to RDS
The value of certain synergies is reflected in some of the
valuation methodologies utilized. CIBC World Markets also
considered whether any distinctive material benefits that are
unique to RDS would accrue from its acquisition of all of the
Shares. Possible benefits or cost savings might accrue to RDS
with respect to the following areas: (i) the consolidation
of the human resources and infrastructure required for the
development of the SURE Northern Energy oil sands leases owned
by RDS and the accelerated development thereof, (ii) the
integration of Shell Canadas oil sands business with the
RDS downstream businesses in the United States, (iii) the
elimination of certain general and administrative functions, and
(iv) the opportunity to utilize consolidated tax planning
strategies. CIBC World Markets did not have sufficient financial
information or analysis from RDS to quantify such benefits but
believes they could be material in the aggregate.
Valuation Summary and Conclusion
In arriving at an opinion of fair market value of the Shares,
CIBC World Markets did not attribute any particular weight to
any specific factor but made qualitative judgments based on
experience in rendering such opinions and on circumstances then
prevailing as to the significance and relevance of each factor.
CIBC World Markets did, however, weight each valuation approach
differently and ascribed the greatest amount of importance to
the DCF approach.
Based upon and subject to the factors set out in the Valuation,
CIBC World Markets expressed the opinion that, as of
January 22, 2007, the fair market value of the Shares was
in the range of $42 to $48 per Share.
The Fairness Opinion
The following summary is qualified in its entirety by the full
text of the Fairness Opinion which sets forth the assumptions
made, matters considered and limitations on the review
undertaken in connection with the Fairness Opinion, and which is
included as Schedule B to this Directors Circular.
The Board of Directors urges Shareholders to read the
Fairness Opinion in its entirety.
The Fairness Opinion was provided to the Special Committee for
its use in considering the Offer and is not to be construed as a
recommendation to any Shareholder to accept or reject the Offer.
12
Scope of Review
In connection with rendering the Fairness Opinion, CIBC World
Markets reviewed and relied upon the Valuation and those items
identified in the Valuation under the heading Scope of
Review. In addition, CIBC World Markets reviewed and
relied upon such other information, analyses, investigations and
discussions as it considered necessary or appropriate in the
circumstances.
General Assumption and Limitations
The conclusion expressed in the Fairness Opinion is subject to
all of the conditions, limitations, qualifications, disclaimers
and assumptions reflected in and underlying the Valuation. The
analysis, investigations, research, testing of assumptions and
conclusions reflected in and underlying the Valuation are
integral to the provision of the Fairness Opinion.
The Fairness Opinion was given as of January 22, 2007 and,
although CIBC World Markets reserves the right to change or
withdraw the Fairness Opinion if it learns that any of the
information that it relied upon in preparing the Fairness
Opinion was inaccurate, incomplete or misleading in any material
respect, CIBC World Markets disclaims any obligation to change
or withdraw the Fairness Opinion, to advise any person of any
change that may come to its attention or to update the Fairness
Opinion after such date.
Fairness Methodology
In considering the fairness, from a financial point of view, of
the consideration to be offered to Shareholders pursuant to the
Offer, CIBC World Markets considered and relied upon the
following:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
a comparison of the consideration to the fair market value range
of the Shares as determined in the Valuation; and |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
a comparison of the consideration to precedent transaction
premia and to the closing price of the Shares on the TSX prior
to RDS initial announcement of its intention to make an
offer to acquire the Shares held by Shareholders. |
CIBC World Markets also reviewed premia paid in certain
transactions that it considered may be relevant for the purpose
of its analysis.
Conclusion
Based upon and subject to the factors set out in the Fairness
Opinion, CIBC World Markets expressed the opinion that, as of
the date of the Fairness Opinion, the consideration to be
offered to Shareholders under the Offer was fair, from a
financial point of view, to the Shareholders.
Copies of the Valuation and the Fairness Opinion (i) will
be available for inspection and copying at the principal
executive offices of Shell Canada during its regular business
hours by any interested Shareholder or representative who has
been so designated in writing, and (ii) may be obtained by
mail through written request to Shell Canada.
PRIOR VALUATIONS
To the knowledge of Shell Canada and its directors and senior
officers, after reasonably inquiry, other than the Valuation,
there have been no prior valuations, as defined in the Rules,
prepared in respect of Shell Canada or the Shares during the
last two years.
SUPPORT AGREEMENT
The Support Agreement sets forth, among other things, the terms
and conditions upon which the Offer is to be made by the
Offeror. The following is a summary of the principal terms of
the Support Agreement. This summary is qualified in its entirety
by the full text of the Support Agreement filed by Shell Canada
with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities and
available under Shell Canadas profile on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com.
Under the Support Agreement, the Offeror agreed, subject to the
terms and conditions of the Support Agreement, to make the Offer
and to mail the RDS Circular to Shareholders on or before
February 8, 2007. Also under the Support Agreement, Shell
Canada agreed to provide the Directors Circular to the
Offeror for mailing to Shareholders at the same time, and in the
same package, as the RDS Circular. Shell Canada also agreed to
use its reasonable best efforts to
13
ensure that all holders of Options either accept the Option
Proposal or, to the extent that Options are currently vested,
exercise their Options in exchange for Shares and deposit such
Shares under the Offer.
The Support Agreement also provides that the Offeror may, in its
sole discretion, modify or waive any term or condition of the
Offer; provided that the Offeror shall not, without the prior
consent of Shell Canada: (a) increase the Minimum
Condition; (b) decrease the consideration per Share;
(c) change the form of consideration payable under the
Offer (other than to increase the total consideration per Share
and/or add additional consideration); (d) decrease the
number of Shares in respect of which the Offer is made; or
(e) impose additional conditions or otherwise vary the
Offer in a manner which is adverse to the Shareholders.
The Support Agreement contains customary representations and
warranties and covenants on the part of Shell Canada and the
Offeror, including, but not limited to, covenants of Shell
Canada (i) to carry on its business, and cause each of its
subsidiaries and, to the extent possible, its material joint
ventures to carry on business, in the ordinary course,
(ii) not to issue securities or make changes to its capital
structure or declare, set aside or pay any dividends on or make
any other distributions on or in respect of the Shares (other
than quarterly cash dividends of $0.11 per Share in
accordance with Shell Canadas past practice),
(iii) to assist the Offeror in completion of the Offer,
(iv) not to interfere with or delay the completion of the
Offer, (v) to allow the Offeror access to the books,
records, management and properties of Shell Canada, and
(vi) not to frustrate and to cooperate with the
Offerors attempt to designate all of the directors of the
Board of Directors provided that the Offeror takes up and pays
for Shares pursuant to the Offer and that the Minimum Condition
shall have been satisfied (and not waived). Shell Canada has
also represented in the Support Agreement that, after reasonable
inquiry, it believes that the directors intend to tender all of
their Shares, including any Shares issued upon the exercise of
all Options held by them, to the Offer.
The Support Agreement provides that nothing in the Support
Agreement prohibits the Special Committee or the Board of
Directors from taking any action consistent with the Board of
Directors fiduciary duties.
The Support Agreement also contains covenants of the Offeror,
including covenants to cause Shell Canada to maintain its
current directors and officers insurance policy, or
a policy reasonably equivalent, for a period of six years after
the Expiry Time (as defined in the RDS Circular), to
continue to indemnify the current and former directors of Shell
Canada and its subsidiaries following the Expiry Time, and not
to interfere with or otherwise restrict the performance by Shell
Canada and its subsidiaries of their obligations to their
respective employees.
The Support Agreement provides that if, within 120 days
after the date of the Offer, the Offer has been accepted by
holders of not less than 90% of the outstanding Shares held by
Shareholders as at the Expiry Time, the Offeror may, to the
extent possible, acquire the remainder of the Shares from those
Shareholders who have not accepted the Offer, pursuant to
Section 206 of the CBCA. If that statutory right of
acquisition is not available or the Offeror chooses not to avail
itself of such statutory right of acquisition, the Offeror will
use its commercially reasonable efforts to pursue other means of
acquiring Shares not tendered to the Offer at a consideration
per Share at least equivalent in value to, and in the same form
as, the consideration per Share offered under the Offer.
If the Minimum Condition is satisfied and the Offeror takes up
and pays for Shares under the Offer, the Support Agreement
provides that Shell Canada will assist the Offeror in connection
with any proposed amalgamation, statutory arrangement, amendment
to articles, stock consolidation, capital reorganization or
other transaction (each, a subsequent acquisition
transaction) involving Shell Canada and the Offeror, or a
subsidiary of the Offeror, to acquire the remaining Shares and
any outstanding Options, provided that the consideration per
Share offered in connection with any such subsequent acquisition
transaction is at least equivalent to, and in the same form as,
the consideration per Share offered under the Offer. The Offeror
and its affiliates are not, however, prevented from acquiring,
directly or indirectly, additional Shares in the open market or
in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise in accordance
with applicable securities laws.
Shell Canada, when not in default in performance of its
obligations under the Support Agreement, may terminate the
Support Agreement, if: (a) the Offer is not made on or
before February 8, 2007; (b) the Offer does not
substantially conform with the description in the Support
Agreement; (c) Shares deposited under the Offer have not
been taken up and paid for on or before the expiry of
10 days after the expiry of the Offer; (d) the Offeror
has not taken up and paid for at least a majority of Shares then
outstanding not currently owned by the Offeror and its
affiliates by June 30, 2007; or (e) the Offeror
breaches the Support Agreement in any material respect. The
Offeror, when not in default in the performance of its
obligations under the Support Agreement, may terminate the
Support Agreement if: (a) the conditions to the Offer are
not satisfied or waived by the Offeror on or prior to the expiry
of the Offer, or any extension
14
thereof; (b) Shell Canada breaches the Support Agreement in
any material respect; or (c) the Directors Circular
does not substantially conform with the description in the
Support Agreement. The conditions to the Offer, including the
Minimum Condition, are as set out in the Support Agreement and
the RDS Circular and include, but are not limited to
(i) receipt of all consents and approvals necessary or
desirable to complete the Offer, (ii) the absence of
certain adverse proceedings or certain adverse laws,
(iii) the absence of certain breaches by Shell Canada of
representations, warranties or covenants under the Support
Agreement, and (iv) the absence of certain material adverse
effects on Shell Canada. If the Support Agreement is terminated
as provided in the foregoing, the Offeror may terminate or
withdraw the Offer.
The Offeror and Shell Canada have also agreed to consult with
each other in respect of any disclosure made in respect to the
Offer and to provide access to the Offeror and its
representatives to the books, records and employees of
Shell Canada. Shell Canada has also agreed to notify the Offeror
of any discussions related to the Offer with holders of more
than 100,000 Shares.
RDS and Shell Canada have also entered into the Option
Proposal to establish a mechanism to offer RDS Replacement
Options to holders of Options, subject to obtaining all
necessary regulatory approvals and the Offeror taking up and
paying for Shares deposited under the Offer in a number
satisfying the Minimum Condition. The full text of the Option
Proposal has been filed by Shell Canada with the Canadian
securities regulatory authorities and is available under Shell
Canadas profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
INTENTIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE OFFER
Each of the directors and senior officers of Shell Canada has
indicated that, as at the date hereof, he or she intends to
accept the Offer in respect of outstanding Shares held by such
directors and officers. To the knowledge of the directors and
senior officers of Shell Canada, after reasonable inquiry, each
of their associates who owns outstanding Shares has indicated an
intention, as at the date hereof, to accept the Offer and
deposit all of their outstanding Shares to the Offer.
Each of the senior officers of Shell Canada has also indicated
that, as at the date hereof, he or she intends to elect to
exchange vested and unvested Options held by such officer in
accordance with the Option Proposal, subject to the terms and
conditions of such proposal being resolved in a satisfactory
manner.
OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES BY DIRECTORS
AND SENIOR OFFICERS OF SHELL CANADA
The names of the directors and senior officers of Shell Canada
and the number of securities, beneficially owned, directly or
indirectly, or over which control or direction is exercised by
them and, to their knowledge after reasonable inquiry, their
respective associates, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities of Shell Canada(1) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number and | |
|
Number of | |
|
% Options/ | |
|
Deferred | |
|
|
|
|
Percentage(2) | |
|
Options/ | |
|
SARs | |
|
Share | |
Name |
|
Positions Held |
|
of Shares | |
|
SARs(3) | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Units(4)(5) | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Derek H. Burney, O.C.
|
|
Lead Director |
|
|
12,846 |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,253.15 |
|
Louise Fréchette, O.C.
(6)
|
|
Director |
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460.77 |
|
David
Galloway(6)
|
|
Director |
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
479.94 |
|
Ida J. Goodreau
|
|
Director |
|
|
2,817 |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,763.68 |
|
Kerry L. Hawkins
|
|
Director |
|
|
13,539 |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,809.81 |
|
David W. Kerr
|
|
Director |
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,473.35 |
|
Clive Mather
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
810,000 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
21,952.09 |
|
Marvin E. Odum
|
|
Director |
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nil |
|
Ronald W. Osborne
|
|
Director |
|
|
7,782 |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,895.49 |
|
Rob J. Routs
|
|
Chairman of the Meetings of the Board |
|
|
1,509 |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nil |
|
Raymond Royer, O.C.
|
|
Director |
|
|
30,708 |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nil |
|
Nancy C. Southern
|
|
Director |
|
|
12,604 |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,931.08 |
|
David C. Aldous
|
|
Senior Vice President, Oil Products |
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nil |
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities of Shell Canada(1) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number and | |
|
Number of | |
|
% Options/ | |
|
Deferred | |
|
|
|
|
Percentage(2) | |
|
Options/ | |
|
SARs | |
|
Share | |
Name |
|
Positions Held |
|
of Shares | |
|
SARs(3) | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Units(4)(5) | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Timothy J. Bancroft
|
|
Vice President, Sustainable Development, Technology and Public
Affairs |
|
|
2,361 |
|
|
|
344,000 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
Graham Bojé
|
|
Vice President, Manufacturing and Supply |
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
237,000 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
David R. Brinley
|
|
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nil |
|
David Collyer
|
|
Vice President, Frontier |
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
384,000 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
Ramzi Fawaz
|
|
Vice President, Projects, Oil Sands |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nil |
|
R. David Fulton
|
|
Vice President, Human Resources |
|
|
2,324 |
|
|
|
184,500 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
Matthew B. Haney
|
|
Treasurer |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
270,500 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
H. Ian Kilgour
|
|
Senior Vice President, Exploration & Production |
|
|
15,861 |
|
|
|
928,800 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
Brian E. Straub
|
|
Senior Vice President, Oil Sands |
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
192,000 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
2,664.83 |
|
Rob W.P. Symonds
|
|
Vice President, Foothills |
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
330,000 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
Donna Tarka
|
|
Controller |
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
82,900 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
Cathy L. Williams
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
36,300 |
|
|
|
738,000 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
Thomas Zengerly
|
|
Vice President, Oil Sands Operations |
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nil |
|
Notes:
|
|
(1) |
The information as to securities of Shell Canada beneficially
owned, directly or indirectly, or over which control or
direction is exercised, not being within the knowledge of Shell
Canada, has been furnished by the respective directors and
senior officers. |
|
(2) |
The number of Shares indicated in the column represents, in each
case, less than 1% of the outstanding Shares. |
|
(3) |
The term SARs refers to share appreciation rights
attached to Options and are a cash payment feature which
provides the Option holder the right to surrender the
exercisable Option for cancellation in return for a cash payment
from Shell Canada. |
|
(4) |
Each director of Shell Canada that is not an employee of Shell
Canada or of RDS or any affiliate thereof may elect to
participate in the Deferred Share Unit Plan for Non-Employee
Directors of Shell Canada pursuant to which DSUs are awarded.
Upon termination of board service, a holder of DSUs is eligible
to convert the DSUs to cash in an amount equal to the market
value of the Shares when the conversion is effective. |
|
(5) |
Each of the President and Chief Executive Officer, the Chief
Financial Officer and the Senior Vice Presidents of Shell Canada
may elect to participate in the Deferred Share Unit Plan for
Executive Employees of Shell Canada and receive all or a
percentage of their annual incentive payment in the form of
DSUs. Upon termination of employment with Shell Canada or any
affiliate thereof, a holder of DSUs is eligible to convert the
DSUs to cash in an amount equal to the market value of the
Shares when the conversion takes place. |
|
(6) |
Ms. Louise Fréchette and Mr. David Galloway
joined the Board of Directors on September 28, 2006. |
PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES OF SHELL CANADA
To the knowledge of the directors and senior officers of Shell
Canada, after reasonable inquiry, no person owns, directly or
indirectly, or exercises control or direction over, more than
10% of the outstanding Shares as at the date of this
Directors Circular, other than Shell Investments Limited,
of Calgary, Alberta, which, together with its affiliates, holds
643,308,858 Shares representing approximately 78% of the
outstanding Shares, and no securities of Shell Canada are owned,
directly or indirectly, or controlled by any person acting
jointly or in concert with Shell Canada.
16
TRADING IN SECURITIES OF SHELL CANADA
None of Shell Canada, the directors and senior officers of Shell
Canada or, to the knowledge of the directors and senior officers
of Shell Canada, after reasonable inquiry, any associates of the
directors and senior officers of Shell Canada, any person
holding more than 10% of the Shares, or any person acting
jointly or in concert with Shell Canada has traded in any
securities of Shell Canada during the six month period preceding
the date of this Directors Circular except for trades set
forth below and under the heading Issuances of Securities
of Shell Canada.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designation and | |
|
|
Name |
|
Date of Trade(1) |
|
Nature of Trade(2) |
|
Number of Securities | |
|
Price per Security | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Raymond Royer
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under Director Share Compensation Plan |
|
|
643 Shares |
|
|
$ |
30.70 |
|
Raymond Royer
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under Director Share Compensation Plan |
|
|
392 Shares |
|
|
$ |
43.53 |
|
Nancy Southern
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under Director Share Compensation Plan |
|
|
472 Shares |
|
|
$ |
30.70 |
|
Nancy Southern
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under Director Share Compensation Plan |
|
|
379 Shares |
|
|
$ |
43.53 |
|
Tim Bancroft
|
|
August 10, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
18.67 Shares |
|
|
$ |
40.17 |
|
Tim Bancroft
|
|
September 13, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
21.81 Shares |
|
|
$ |
34.38 |
|
Tim Bancroft
|
|
September 21, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
7.67 Shares |
|
|
$ |
32.25 |
|
Tim Bancroft
|
|
October 12, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
24.41 Shares |
|
|
$ |
30.73 |
|
Tim Bancroft
|
|
November 9, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
17.45 Shares |
|
|
$ |
42.97 |
|
Tim Bancroft
|
|
December 11, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
17.22 Shares |
|
|
$ |
43.55 |
|
Tim Bancroft
|
|
December 28, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
5.84 Shares |
|
|
$ |
43.72 |
|
Tim Bancroft
|
|
January 10, 2007 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
17.53 Shares |
|
|
$ |
42.79 |
|
David Fulton
|
|
August 10, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
18.67 Shares |
|
|
$ |
40.17 |
|
David Fulton
|
|
September 13, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
21.81 Shares |
|
|
$ |
34.38 |
|
David Fulton
|
|
September 21, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
1.17 Shares |
|
|
$ |
32.25 |
|
David Fulton
|
|
October 12, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
24.41 Shares |
|
|
$ |
30.73 |
|
David Fulton
|
|
November 9, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
17.45 Shares |
|
|
$ |
42.97 |
|
David Fulton
|
|
December 11, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
17.22 Shares |
|
|
$ |
43.55 |
|
David Fulton
|
|
December 28, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
1.03 Shares |
|
|
$ |
43.72 |
|
David Fulton
|
|
January 10, 2007 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
17.53 Shares |
|
|
$ |
42.79 |
|
Ian Kilgour
|
|
August 10, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
18.67 Shares |
|
|
$ |
40.17 |
|
Ian Kilgour
|
|
September 13, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
21.81 Shares |
|
|
$ |
34.38 |
|
Ian Kilgour
|
|
September 21, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
7.67 Shares |
|
|
$ |
32.25 |
|
Ian Kilgour
|
|
October 12, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
24.41 Shares |
|
|
$ |
30.73 |
|
Ian Kilgour
|
|
November 9, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
17.45 Shares |
|
|
$ |
42.97 |
|
Ian Kilgour
|
|
December 11, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
17.22 Shares |
|
|
$ |
43.55 |
|
Ian Kilgour
|
|
December 28, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
5.84 Shares |
|
|
$ |
43.72 |
|
Ian Kilgour
|
|
January 10, 2007 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
17.53 Shares |
|
|
$ |
42.79 |
|
Rob Symonds
|
|
August 10, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
18.67 Shares |
|
|
$ |
40.17 |
|
Rob Symonds
|
|
September 13, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
21.81 Shares |
|
|
$ |
34.38 |
|
Rob Symonds
|
|
September 21, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
1.35 Shares |
|
|
$ |
32.25 |
|
Rob Symonds
|
|
October 12, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
24.41 Shares |
|
|
$ |
30.73 |
|
Rob Symonds
|
|
November 9, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
17.45 Shares |
|
|
$ |
42.97 |
|
Rob Symonds
|
|
December 11, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
17.22 Shares |
|
|
$ |
43.55 |
|
Rob Symonds
|
|
December 28, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
1.16 Shares |
|
|
$ |
43.72 |
|
Rob Symonds
|
|
January 10, 2007 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
17.53 Shares |
|
|
$ |
42.79 |
|
Donna Tarka
|
|
August 10, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
12.45 Shares |
|
|
$ |
40.17 |
|
Donna Tarka
|
|
September 13, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
14.54 Shares |
|
|
$ |
34.38 |
|
Donna Tarka
|
|
September 21, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
0.78 Shares |
|
|
$ |
32.25 |
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designation and | |
|
|
Name |
|
Date of Trade(1) |
|
Nature of Trade(2) |
|
Number of Securities | |
|
Price per Security | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Donna Tarka
|
|
October 12, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
16.27 Shares |
|
|
$ |
30.73 |
|
Donna Tarka
|
|
November 9, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
11.64 Shares |
|
|
$ |
42.97 |
|
Donna Tarka
|
|
December 11, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
11.48 Shares |
|
|
$ |
43.55 |
|
Donna Tarka
|
|
December 28, 2006 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
0.68 Shares |
|
|
$ |
43.72 |
|
Donna Tarka
|
|
January 10, 2007 |
|
Acquisition under ESPP |
|
|
11.69 Shares |
|
|
$ |
42.79 |
|
Notes:
|
|
(1) |
This information is presented as at February 5, 2007 and
does not include further acquisitions under the ESPP which are
expected to automatically occur in early February 2007. |
|
(2) |
Each of these acquisitions were effected through the facilities
of the TSX. |
ISSUANCES OF SECURITIES OF SHELL CANADA
Except for the Options and Shares disclosed in the following
table, no Shares or securities convertible into Shares have been
issued to any of the directors or senior officers of Shell
Canada during the two year period preceding the date of this
Directors Circular.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
Name |
|
Date Issued |
|
Nature of Issue(1) |
|
Securities Issued | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Tim Bancroft
|
|
February 7, 2006 |
|
Grant of Options |
|
|
50,000 Options |
|
|
$ |
43.50 |
|
Graham Bojé
|
|
February 7, 2006 |
|
Grant of Options |
|
|
57,000 Options |
|
|
$ |
43.50 |
|
Dave Collyer
|
|
February 7, 2006 |
|
Grant of Options |
|
|
60,000 Options |
|
|
$ |
43.50 |
|
David Fulton
|
|
February 7, 2006 |
|
Grant of Options |
|
|
57,000 Options |
|
|
$ |
43.50 |
|
Matt Haney
|
|
February 7, 2006 |
|
Grant of Options |
|
|
50,000 Options |
|
|
$ |
43.50 |
|
Ian Kilgour
|
|
February 7, 2006 |
|
Grant of Options |
|
|
150,000 Options |
|
|
$ |
43.50 |
|
Ian Kilgour
|
|
May 11, 2006 |
|
Exercise of Options |
|
|
13,500 Shares |
|
|
$ |
5.94 |
|
Clive Mather
|
|
February 7, 2006 |
|
Grant of Options |
|
|
330,000 Options |
|
|
$ |
43.50 |
|
Brian Straub
|
|
February 7, 2006 |
|
Grant of Options |
|
|
150,000 Options |
|
|
$ |
43.50 |
|
Rob Symonds
|
|
February 7, 2006 |
|
Grant of Options |
|
|
57,000 Options |
|
|
$ |
43.50 |
|
Donna Tarka
|
|
February 7, 2006 |
|
Grant of Options |
|
|
25,000 Options |
|
|
$ |
43.50 |
|
Cathy Williams
|
|
November 4, 2005 |
|
Exercise of Options |
|
|
18,300 Shares |
|
|
$ |
35.30 |
|
Cathy Williams
|
|
February 7, 2006 |
|
Grant of Options |
|
|
150,000 Options |
|
|
$ |
43.50 |
|
Note:
|
|
(1) |
Each of these grants and exercises of Options were private
transactions completed in Canada. |
ARRANGEMENTS BETWEEN SHELL CANADA AND DIRECTORS AND
SENIOR OFFICERS OF SHELL CANADA
Except as described herein, or in Part IV, The
Corporations Executive Compensation Program in Shell
Canadas Management Proxy Circular dated March 10,
2006, which was delivered to Shell Canada shareholders in
connection with Shell Canadas 2006 Annual and Special
Meeting of Shareholders and which has been filed with the
Canadian securities regulatory authorities and is available
under Shell Canadas profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com,
which Part IV is incorporated herein by reference, except
to the extent the disclosure herein supersedes certain
information contained therein, there are no material
arrangements, agreements or understandings between Shell Canada
or its subsidiaries and any of the directors or senior officers,
nor are there any arrangements, agreements or understandings
made or proposed to be made pursuant to which a payment or other
benefit is to be made or given by way of compensation for loss
of office or as to Shell Canadas directors or senior
officers remaining in or retiring from office if the Offer is
successful.
Options
Shell Canada has a Long Term Incentive Plan pursuant to which
the Management Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors awards Options with attached tandem SARs to
selected officers and employees. The LTIP is intended to align
the interests of employees with shareholders and to act as an
attraction and retention incentive. Shell Canada believes that
the LTIP encourages achievement of long-term goals of Shell
Canada and
18
therefore complements and acts as a balance to the annual
incentive pay program of Shell Canada. See Ownership of
Securities by Directors and Senior Officers of Shell
Canada above.
The Offer is made only for Shares and is not made for any
outstanding, unexercised Options or other rights to acquire
Shares. As set out in a separate Option Exchange Letter from
Shell Canada Options Corporation (SCOC), Shell
Canada and RDS dated February 8, 2007, SCOC has offered
Option holders the opportunity, subject to obtaining all
necessary regulatory and other approvals and the Offeror taking
up and paying for Shares deposited under the Offer in a number
satisfying the Minimum Condition, to exchange their unexercised
Options for RDS Replacement Options entitling holders thereof to
acquire from SCOC previously issued and outstanding Class A
ordinary shares of RDS.
Indemnity Agreements
The directors and officers of Shell Canada have indemnity
agreements with Shell Canada pursuant to which, in accordance
with the provisions of the by-laws of Shell Canada and the CBCA,
such directors and officers will be indemnified by Shell Canada,
to the fullest extent permitted by the CBCA, in respect of all
costs and liabilities which each of them may incur as a result
of his or her having acted as a director and/or officer of Shell
Canada.
Directors and Officers Insurance
The Offeror has agreed that for the period from the Expiry Time
(as defined in the RDS Circular) until six years after the
Expiry Time, the Offeror will cause Shell Canada or any
successor thereof to maintain Shell Canadas current
directors and officers insurance policy or a policy
reasonably equivalent, subject in either case to terms and
conditions no less advantageous to the directors and officers of
Shell Canada than those contained in the policy in effect on the
date of the Support Agreement, for all present and former
directors and officers of the Corporation and its subsidiaries,
covering claims made prior to or within six years after the
Expiry Time.
Employment Arrangements
Pursuant to Mr. Clive Mathers employment arrangement
with Shell Canada, in the event he is terminated as President
and Chief Executive Officer of Shell Canada for any reason other
than gross misconduct prior to July 31, 2008,
Mr. Mather will become entitled to a lump sum payment equal
to (i) his annual gross salary, if he is terminated prior
to July 31, 2007; or (ii) his annual gross salary
reduced by 1/12th for each month worked after July 31, 2007
until his termination occurs. Mr. Mather also has an
entitlement to receive a pension from the Shell Contributory
Pensions Trust, sponsored by RDS or an affiliate thereof in the
United Kingdom, and his spouse currently receives a pension from
the Shell Contributory Pensions Trust.
Ms. Cathy Williams, Chief Financial Officer, Messrs Ian
Kilgour and Brian Straub, each a Senior Vice President, and
Messrs Tim Bancroft, Graham Bojé, David Fulton and Rob
Symonds, each a Vice President, are members of the Senior Staff
Retirement Plan. It has been Shell Canadas practice to
retire senior management at age 60 and, to recognize this
earlier than normal retirement age, Shell Canada has provided a
Senior Staff Retirement Plan which allows a senior executive who
retires at age 60 to elect to receive either (i) a lump-sum
payment equal to terminal salary plus a three year rolling
average of pensionable annual incentive pay received immediately
prior to retirement date multiplied by two; or (ii) a
supplementary pension equivalent to the straight-life annuity
that can be provided by terminal salary plus a three year
rolling average of pensionable annual incentive pay received
immediately prior to retirement date multiplied by 1.5 which
provides benefits consistent with Shell Canadas retirement
and savings program. The Senior Staff Retirement Plan is now
closed to new participants.
19
ARRANGEMENTS BETWEEN RDS OR THE OFFEROR
AND DIRECTORS AND SENIOR OFFICERS OF SHELL CANADA
Except as described in this Directors Circular, there are
no arrangements or agreements made or proposed to be made, nor
any understandings between, the Offeror and RDS and any of their
respective directors, senior officers or affiliates, on the one
hand, and Shell Canada and any of its directors, senior officers
or affiliates, on the other hand, including any arrangements,
agreements or understandings pursuant to which a payment or
other benefit is to be made or given by way of compensation for
loss of office or as to Shell Canadas directors or senior
officers remaining in or retiring from office if the Offer is
successful. Other than as set forth below, no directors or
senior officers of Shell Canada are also directors or senior
officers of the Offeror or RDS or any of their affiliates (other
than Shell Canada and its subsidiaries).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position with RDS, the Offeror or any |
|
|
Name |
|
Affiliate of RDS or the Offeror |
|
Entity Position is held with |
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew B. Haney
|
|
Vice President, Treasurer and a Director |
|
Shell Hydrogen Investments Canada Inc. |
Clive Mather
|
|
Director |
|
Shell Chemicals Canada Ltd. |
Marvin E. Odum
|
|
Executive Vice President
Americas, Shell Exploration and Production |
|
Shell Oil Company |
Rob J. Routs
|
|
Executive Director |
|
RDS |
Cathy L. Williams
|
|
President and a Director |
|
Shell Hydrogen Investments Canada Inc. |
In addition, Mr. David Aldous, Senior Vice President, Oil
Products of Shell Canada, and Messrs David Brinley, Ramzi
Fawaz and Thomas Zengerly, each a Vice President of Shell
Canada, are employed by affiliates of RDS and are currently on
secondment to Shell Canada under customary terms and conditions
of employment.
INTERESTS OF DIRECTORS AND SENIOR OFFICERS OF SHELL CANADA
IN MATERIAL CONTRACTS OF RDS OR THE OFFEROR
Except for the Support Agreement, the Option Proposal and as
otherwise disclosed in this Directors Circular, none of
the directors or senior officers of Shell Canada or, to the
knowledge of the directors or senior officers of Shell Canada,
after reasonable inquiry, their respective associates or any
person holding more than 10% of the Shares (other than RDS) has
any interest in any material contract to which RDS or the
Offeror is a party.
OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES OF RDS OR THE OFFEROR
Other than as set forth below, none of Shell Canada or the
directors or senior officers of Shell Canada or, to the
knowledge of the directors and senior officers of Shell Canada,
after reasonable inquiry, any associates of the directors or
senior officers of Shell Canada, any person holding more than
10% of the Shares (other than RDS which indirectly owns all of
the outstanding shares of the Offeror), or any person acting
jointly or in concert with Shell Canada, owns or exercises
control or direction over any securities of any class of RDS or
the Offeror.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities of RDS Beneficially Owned, Directly or |
Name |
|
Position with Shell Canada |
|
Indirectly(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
David W. Kerr
|
|
Director |
|
861 RDS B Shares |
Clive Mather
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director |
|
167,599 RDS B Options |
Marvin E. Odum
|
|
Director |
|
174,641 RDS.A ADR Shares |
Rob J. Routs
|
|
Director |
|
1,023 RDS A Shares |
|
|
|
|
514,932 RDS A Options |
|
|
|
|
241,654 RDS Performance Shares |
David C. Aldous
|
|
Senior Vice President, Oil Products |
|
91 RDS A Shares
39,300 RDS.A ADR Options
15,250 RDS.A ADR Performance Shares |
Graham Bojé
|
|
Vice President, Manufacturing and Supply |
|
965 RDS B Options |
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities of RDS Beneficially Owned, Directly or |
Name |
|
Position with Shell Canada |
|
Indirectly(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
David R. Brinley
|
|
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
|
91 RDS A Shares
8,250 RDS.A ADR Options |
|
|
|
|
3,225 RDS.A ADR Unvested Share Plan Awards |
|
|
|
|
3,851 Units of RDS Stock Fund |
Ramzi Fawaz
|
|
Vice President, Projects, Oil Sands |
|
376 RDS A Shares |
|
|
|
|
6,050 RDS A Deferred Share Units |
|
|
|
|
30,400 RDS A Options |
R. David Fulton
|
|
Vice President, Human Resources |
|
11,600 RDS A Options |
Matt Haney
|
|
Treasurer |
|
24,200 RDS A Options |
Brian Straub
|
|
Senior Vice President, Oil Sands |
|
90,400 RDS A Options |
Rob W.P. Symonds
|
|
Vice President, Foothills |
|
3,120 RDS A Shares |
Cathy Williams
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
26,000 RDS A Options |
Thomas Zengerly
|
|
Vice President, Oil Sands Operations |
|
58,700 RDS A Options |
Note:
|
|
(1) |
The information as to securities of RDS beneficially owned,
directly or indirectly, or over which control is exercised, not
being within the knowledge of Shell Canada, has been furnished
by the respective directors and senior officers. |
OTHER TRANSACTIONS
There is no transaction, resolution of the Board of Directors,
agreement in principle or signed contract of Shell Canada, other
than as described or referred to in this Directors
Circular, which has occurred in response to the Offer. Other
than as described or referred to in this Directors
Circular, no negotiations are underway in response to the Offer
which relate to or would result in (i) an extraordinary
transaction such as a merger or reorganization involving Shell
Canada or a subsidiary; (ii) the purchase, sale or transfer
of a material amount of assets by Shell Canada or a subsidiary;
(iii) an issuer bid or other acquisition of securities by
or of Shell Canada; or (iv) any material change in the
capitalization or dividend policy of Shell Canada.
MATERIAL CHANGES
Except as publicly disclosed or as otherwise described in this
Directors Circular, the directors and senior officers of
Shell Canada are not aware of any other information that
indicates any material change in the affairs of Shell Canada
since December 31, 2006, the date of the last published
unaudited interim financial statements of Shell Canada.
RECENT ANNOUNCEMENTS BY SHELL CANADA
On January 24, 2007, Shell Canada announced the following:
|
|
|
|
|
a quarterly dividend of eleven cents ($0.11) per common share.
The dividend is an eligible dividend for Canadian income tax
purposes and will be payable March 15, 2007, to all
shareholders of record on February 15, 2007; |
|
|
|
an update to its long term oil sands growth plans to potentially
increase minable bitumen production to approximately 770,000
barrels a day, while potentially increasing upgrading capacity
to approximately 700,000 barrels a day, with confirmation of its
filing of certain regulatory disclosures to advance such plans.
The actual timing for Shell Canadas projects will depend
on market conditions, key economic indicators, the ability to
meet Shell Canadas sustainable development criteria and
the outcome of the regulatory process; |
|
|
|
unaudited annual earnings of $1,738 million or $2.11 per
common share for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared
with $2,001 million or $2.43 per common share in 2005. The
decrease was largely due to the first major scheduled turnaround
of the Athabasca Oil Sands Project which impacted production,
expenses and earnings, together with lower natural gas prices.
Unaudited cash flow from operations was $2,614 million in
2006, down $422 million from 2005, due to the same factors
that impacted full year earnings. Unaudited capital and
predevelopment expenditures amounted to $2,426 million in
2006, excluding the acquisition of |
21
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock Ventures Inc., compared with $1,715 million in
2005. The difference was due to increased investment in growth
activities in unconventional oil and gas; and |
|
|
|
unaudited fourth-quarter earnings of $223 million compared
with $611 million for the same period in 2005. The decrease
was mainly due to lower commodity prices and a charge for the
LTIP. |
The full text of the foregoing announcements may be found in
press releases, dated January 24, 2007, filed by Shell
Canada with Canadian securities regulatory authorities and
available under Shell Canadas profile on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com.
SHARE CAPITAL
Shell Canada is authorized to issue an unlimited number of
common shares, an unlimited number of 4% cumulative redeemable
preference shares and an unlimited number of preferred shares.
As at January 31, 2007, 825,662,514 Shares were
outstanding, no preference or preferred shares were outstanding
and 21,407,238 Shares were reserved for the purpose of
satisfying the exercise of outstanding Options.
OTHER INFORMATION
The directors and senior officers of Shell Canada are not aware
of any other information not disclosed in this Directors
Circular that would reasonably be expected to affect the
decision of Shareholders to accept or reject the Offer.
STATUTORY RIGHTS OF ACTION
Securities legislation in certain of the provinces and
territories of Canada provides securityholders of Shell Canada
with, in addition to any other rights they may have at law,
rights of rescission or to damages, or both, if there is a
misrepresentation in a circular or notice that is required to be
delivered to such securityholders. However, such rights must be
exercised within prescribed time limits. Securityholders should
refer to the applicable provisions of the securities legislation
of their province or territory for particulars of those rights
or consult with a lawyer.
DIRECTORS APPROVAL
The contents of this Directors Circular have been
approved, and the delivery hereof has been authorized, by the
Board of Directors.
22
CONSENT OF CIBC WORLD MARKETS INC.
DATED: February 8, 2007
To: The Board of Directors of Shell Canada Limited
Reference is made to our valuation dated January 22, 2007
(the Valuation) of the common shares
(Shares) of Shell Canada Limited (Shell
Canada) and our opinion letter dated January 22, 2007
(the Fairness Opinion) concerning the fairness, from
a financial point of view, to holders of Shares (other than
Shell Investments Limited and its affiliates) of the
consideration offered to them under the offer by Shell
Investments Limited dated February 8, 2007 to acquire the
Shares.
We hereby consent to the references to the Valuation and the
Fairness Opinion under the captions Background to the
Offer, Recommendation of the Special Committee and
the Board of Directors and Valuation and Fairness
Opinion and to the inclusion of each of the Valuation and
the Fairness Opinion in the Directors Circular of Shell
Canada dated February 8, 2007. In providing such consent,
we do not intend that any person other than the Board of
Directors of Shell Canada and the Special Committee thereof rely
upon the Valuation or the Fairness Opinion.
(signed) CIBC World
Markets Inc.
23
CERTIFICATE
DATED: February 8, 2007
The foregoing contains no untrue statement of a material fact
and does not omit to state a material fact that is required to
be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not
misleading in the light of the circumstances in which it was
made. Furthermore, the foregoing does not contain any
misrepresentation likely to affect the value or the market price
of the securities subject to the Offer within the meaning of the
Securities Act (Québec).
On behalf of the Board of Directors
|
|
|
(signed) Derek H.
Burney
Director |
|
(signed) Ronald W.
Osborne
Director |
24
SCHEDULE A
VALUATION OF CIBC WORLD MARKETS INC.
January 22, 2007
The Special Committee of the Board of Directors
Shell Canada Limited
400 4th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta T2P 0J4
|
|
Attention: |
Mr. Derek Burney, O.C.
Chairman of the Special Committee |
Dear Sirs:
CIBC World Markets Inc. (CIBC World Markets)
understands that Shell Investments Limited (the
Offeror), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
Royal Dutch Shell plc (RDS), is proposing to make an
offer, by way of a take-over bid, to purchase all of the common
shares (the Common Shares) of Shell Canada Limited
(Shell Canada or the Company) not
already owned by the Offeror and its affiliates (the
Offer).
CIBC World Markets also understands that the Offeror and its
affiliates own approximately 78% of the outstanding Common
Shares and that the Offer would constitute an insider
bid for purposes of
Rule 61-501 of the
Ontario Securities Commission
(Rule 61-501)
and
Regulation Q-27 of
the Quebec Autorité des marchés financiers (together
with Rule 61-501,
the Rules). In addition, CIBC World Markets
understands that the board of directors of the Company (the
Board) has appointed a committee (the Special
Committee) comprised of members of the Board who are
independent of RDS, the Offeror and Shell Canadas
management to consider the Offer and to make recommendations to
the Board with respect to the Offer.
All dollar amounts herein are expressed in Canadian dollars,
unless stated otherwise.
Engagement of CIBC World Markets
CIBC World Markets was first contacted by Shell Canada on
October 21, 2006 concerning RDS potential interest in
making an offer to acquire the Common Shares not owned, directly
or indirectly, by RDS. By letter agreement dated
October 28, 2006 (the Engagement Agreement),
Shell Canada retained CIBC World Markets to provide advice and
assistance to the Special Committee in evaluating the
transaction proposed by RDS, including the preparation and
delivery to the Special Committee of a formal valuation of the
Common Shares (the Valuation) in accordance with the
requirements of the Rules and under the supervision of the
Special Committee. In addition, the Special Committee has
requested CIBC World Markets to provide an opinion (the
Opinion) as to the fairness, from a financial point
of view, of the consideration to be offered to the holders of
the Common Shares, other than the Offeror and its affiliates,
pursuant to the Offer. On January 22, 2007, at the request
of the Special Committee, CIBC World Markets orally delivered
the substance of the Valuation and the Opinion.
The Engagement Agreement provides for a payment to CIBC World
Markets of an engagement and work fee, a fee upon our completion
of certain preliminary financial analyses, a fee upon our
delivery of the Valuation and a fee upon our delivery of the
Opinion. None of the fees payable to us under the Engagement
Agreement are contingent upon the conclusions reached by us in
the Valuation or Opinion or the completion of the Offer. In
addition, the Company has agreed to reimburse CIBC World Markets
for its reasonable expenses and to indemnify CIBC World Markets
in respect of certain liabilities that might arise out of its
engagement. The fees payable to CIBC World Markets pursuant to
the Engagement Agreement are not financially material to CIBC
World Markets. No understandings or agreements exist between
CIBC World Markets, RDS or the Offeror with respect to future
financial advisory or investment banking business.
A-1
Credentials of CIBC World Markets
CIBC World Markets is one of Canadas largest investment
banking firms with operations in all facets of corporate and
government finance, mergers and acquisitions, equity and fixed
income sales and trading and investment research. The opinion
expressed herein is the opinion of CIBC World Markets and the
form and content herein have been approved for release by a
committee of our managing directors and internal counsel, each
of whom is experienced in merger, acquisition, divestiture and
valuation matters.
Relationships with Interested Parties
None of CIBC World Markets or its affiliates:
|
|
|
|
a) |
is an issuer insider, associated entity
or affiliated entity of RDS or the Offeror as such
terms are used in
Rule 61-501; |
|
|
|
|
b) |
is a financial advisor to RDS or the Offeror in connection with
the Offer; |
|
|
|
|
c) |
is a manager or co-manager of a soliciting dealer group formed
to solicit acceptances of the Offer or will it, as a member of
such group, perform services beyond the customary soliciting
dealers functions nor will it receive more than the per
share or per shareholder fee payable to other members of the
group; or |
|
|
|
|
d) |
has a financial incentive with respect to the conclusions
reached in the Valuation or the Opinion nor has a material
financial interest in the completion of the Offer. |
Prior to entering into the Engagement Agreement, CIBC World
Markets has provided various financial advisory services to
Shell Canada in connection with transactions unrelated to the
Offer. The fees paid to CIBC World Markets by Shell Canada and
its affiliates were not financially material to CIBC World
Markets. CIBC World Markets acts as a trader and dealer, both as
principal and agent, in major financial markets and, as such,
may have had, and may in the future have, positions in the
securities of Shell Canada, RDS or their affiliates and, from
time to time, may have executed, or may execute, transactions on
behalf of such entities. CIBC World Markets is an indirect
subsidiary of the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
(CIBC) and CIBC or its affiliated entities have made
or may in the future make loans or provide other financial
services in the normal course to Shell Canada, RDS or their
affiliates.
Scope of Review
In connection with preparing the Valuation, we have reviewed or
relied upon, among other things, the following:
|
|
|
|
i) |
the annual reports, including the comparative audited financial
statements and managements discussion and analysis, of
Shell Canada for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003,
2004 and 2005; |
|
|
ii) |
the interim reports, including the comparative unaudited
financial statements and managements discussion and
analysis, of Shell Canada for the three, six and nine months
ended March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006 and
September 30, 2006; |
|
|
iii) |
a draft dated January 22, 2007 of a Shell Canada press
release containing Shell Canadas financial and operating
results for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006; |
|
|
iv) |
Shell Canadas annual information form dated March 10,
2006; |
|
|
v) |
the management information circular of Shell Canada dated
March 23, 2006 relating to the annual meeting of
shareholders held on April 28, 2006; |
|
|
vi) |
material change reports filed by Shell Canada with Canadian
securities regulatory authorities since December 31, 2005; |
|
|
vii) |
a Shell Canada public disclosure document entitled Shell
Canada Oil Sands Expansion: Jackpine Mine Expansion & Pierre
River Mine dated January 2007; |
|
|
viii) |
the annual report, including the comparative audited financial
statements and managements discussion and analysis, of
BlackRock Ventures Inc. (BlackRock) for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2005; |
|
|
ix) |
BlackRocks annual information form dated March 21,
2006; |
A-2
|
|
|
|
x) |
certain internal financial, operational, business, tax and other
information concerning Shell Canada that was prepared or
provided by the management of Shell Canada, including internal
operating and financial budgets and projections, and the 2006
and 2007 business plans as approved by the Board; |
|
|
xi) |
estimated reserve volumes as at December 31, 2005 for Shell
Canada as prepared by the Companys internal qualified
reserves evaluators and as approved by the Companys
management; |
|
|
xii) |
estimated reserve volumes as at March 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005 for BlackRock as prepared by Sproule
Associates Limited (Sproule), independent reservoir
engineers; |
|
|
xiii) |
estimated undeveloped and developed land acreage as at
October 10, 2006 for Shell Canada as prepared by the
Companys management; |
|
|
xiv) |
discussions with Ryder Scott Company, L.P., independent
reservoir engineers, with respect to its audit of the
methodology utilized by Shell Canada for the internal evaluation
of its conventional oil and gas reserves; |
|
|
xv) |
discussions with Sproule, with respect to its audit of the
methodology utilized by Shell Canada for the internal evaluation
of its oil sands reserves; |
|
|
xvi) |
discussions with and analyses produced by Muse,
Stancil & Co. (Muse Stancil), a global
consulting firm specializing in the energy industry, with
respect to the petroleum refining and marketing sector; |
|
|
xvii) |
selected trading statistics and relevant financial information
of Shell Canada and other public entities; |
|
|
xviii) |
selected relevant precedent transactions and comparable company
trading multiples and analysis; |
|
|
xix) |
selected relevant reports published by equity research analysts
and industry sources regarding Shell Canada and other publicly
traded entities; |
|
|
xx) |
a draft dated January 22, 2007 of the Support Agreement,
which outlines the terms of agreement between the Offeror and
Shell Canada with respect to the Offer; |
|
|
xxi) |
certificates addressed to us, dated as of the date hereof, from
two senior officers of Shell Canada as to the completeness and
accuracy of the information provided to us by Shell Canada; and |
|
|
xxii) |
such other information, analyses, investigations, and
discussions as we considered necessary or appropriate in the
circumstances. |
In addition, we have participated in discussions with members of
the senior management of Shell Canada regarding Shell
Canadas past and current business operations, reserves,
other assets, financial condition and prospects. We have also
participated in discussions with RDS, Morgan Stanley &
Co. Limited and Scotia Waterous Inc., financial advisors to RDS,
regarding the Offer, the Valuation and related matters. In
addition, we have participated in discussions with Ogilvy
Renault LLP, legal counsel to the Special Committee, regarding
the Offer and related matters. To the best of its knowledge,
CIBC World Markets has not been denied access by Shell Canada to
any information it has requested.
Prior Valuations
Shell Canada has represented to CIBC World Markets that no prior
valuation (as defined in
Rule 61-501) has
been prepared in the past 24 months.
Assumptions and Limitations
Our Valuation is subject to the assumptions and limitations
below.
With the Special Committees permission and subject to the
exercise of our professional judgement, we have relied upon and
have assumed the completeness, accuracy and fair presentation of
all financial and other information, data, advice, opinions and
representations obtained by us from public sources, or provided
to us by the Company or its affiliates or advisors or otherwise
obtained by us pursuant to our engagement, and our Valuation is
conditional upon such completeness, accuracy and fair
presentation. We have not been requested to or attempted to
verify independently the accuracy, completeness or fairness of
presentation of any such information, data, advice, opinions and
representations. We have not met separately with the independent
auditors of Shell Canada in connection with preparing this
Valuation and, with the Special Committees permission, we
have assumed the accuracy and fair presentation of, and relied
upon, the Companys audited financial statements and the
reports of the auditors thereon.
A-3
With respect to operating and financial forecasts and budgets
provided to us concerning Shell Canada and relied upon in our
analysis, we have assumed (subject to the exercise of our
professional judgement) that they have been prepared on bases
reflecting the most reasonable assumptions, estimates and
judgements of management of the Company, having regard to the
Companys business plans, financial condition and prospects.
The Company has represented to us, in a certificate of two
senior officers of the Company dated the date hereof that, among
other things, the information, data and other materials provided
to us by or on behalf of the Company, including the written
information and discussions concerning Shell Canada referred to
above under the heading Scope of Review
(collectively, the Shell Canada Information), are
complete and correct at the date the Shell Canada Information
was provided to us and that, since the date of the Shell Canada
Information, there has been no material change, financial or
otherwise, in the financial condition, assets, liabilities
(contingent or otherwise), business, operations or prospects of
the Company and its subsidiaries and no material change has
occurred in the Shell Canada Information or any part thereof
which would have or which would reasonably be expected to have a
material effect on the Valuation.
Except as expressly noted under the heading Scope of
Review, we have not conducted any investigation concerning
the financial condition, assets, liabilities (contingent or
otherwise), business, operations or prospects of Shell Canada or
its subsidiaries. We have not attempted to verify independently
any of the information concerning the Company or any of its
subsidiaries. CIBC World Markets was not authorized to solicit,
and did not solicit, interest from any other potential party
with respect to the acquisition of the Common Shares, or any
business combinations or other extraordinary transactions
involving Shell Canada.
We are not legal, tax or accounting experts and we express no
opinion concerning any legal, tax or accounting matters
concerning the Offer.
Our Valuation is rendered on the basis of securities markets,
economic and general business and financial conditions
prevailing as at the date hereof and the conditions and
prospects, financial and otherwise, of the Company as they are
reflected in the Shell Canada Information and as they were
represented to us in our discussions with management of the
Company and its advisors. In our analyses and in connection with
the preparation of our Valuation, we made numerous assumptions
with respect to industry performance, general business, capital
markets and economic conditions and other matters, many of which
are beyond the control of any party involved in the Offer.
With the Special Committees permission and in accordance
with its determination that the perceived detriment to the
Company of the disclosure of certain sensitive information
outweighs the potential benefit of the disclosure of such
information to the readers of the Valuation, certain detailed
information concerning the Company has been aggregated and
certain portions of our analysis have been presented in summary
form for purposes of disclosure in this Valuation.
This Valuation has been provided to the Special Committee for
its exclusive use in considering the Offer and may not be relied
upon by any person, other than the Special Committee and the
Board, or used for any other purpose or published without the
prior written consent of CIBC World Markets. Our Valuation is
not to be construed as a recommendation to any holder of the
Common Shares to accept or reject the Offer.
The Valuation is given as of the date hereof (the
Valuation Date) and, although we reserve the right
to change or withdraw the Valuation if we learn that any of the
information that we relied upon in preparing the Valuation was
inaccurate, incomplete or misleading in any material respect, we
disclaim any obligation to change or withdraw the Valuation, to
advise any person of any change that may come to our attention
or to update the Valuation after today.
CIBC World Markets believes that its financial analyses must be
considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its
analyses and the factors considered by it, without considering
all factors and analyses together, could create a misleading
view of the process underlying the Valuation. The preparation of
a valuation is complex and is not necessarily susceptible to
partial analysis or summary description and any attempt to do so
could lead to undue emphasis on any particular factor or
analysis.
Overview of Shell Canada
The following description is derived from the Shell Canada
Information.
Shell Canada is a Canadian integrated petroleum company with
operations in three business segments: Oil Sands, Exploration
and Production and Oil Products. Shell Canadas origins
date back to 1911 when RDS predecessors first established
operations in Canada. Shell Canadas shares were first
offered to public investors in 1962.
A-4
Oil Sands
Shell Canada holds a 60 percent interest in the Athabasca
Oil Sands Project (the AOSP). The AOSP is a joint
venture partnership among Shell Canada (60 percent), Chevron
Canada Limited (20 percent) and Western Oil Sands L.P. (20
percent). The AOSPs fully integrated operations include
the Muskeg River Mine and extraction plant located north of
Fort McMurray in northern Alberta and the Scotford Upgrader
located adjacent to Shell Canadas Scotford Refinery near
Edmonton, Alberta. As the majority owner, Shell Canada is the
overall project administrator as well as operator of the
Scotford Upgrader. Albian Sands Energy Inc., a company created
by the AOSP joint venture, operates the Muskeg River Mine. The
Corridor Pipeline System (Corridor), which is owned
by a third party, transports diluted bitumen from the Muskeg
River Mine to the Scotford Upgrader, and connects the Scotford
Upgrader with pipeline and marketing terminals in the Edmonton
area. Corridor also provides oil storage facilities required for
the AOSP.
The AOSP was officially opened and began fully integrated
operations at the Muskeg River Mine and Scotford Upgrader in
June 2003. In the fourth quarter of 2006, Shell Canadas
share of bitumen production from the AOSP averaged 106,600
barrels per day (bbl/d).
During the fourth quarter of 2006, Shell Canada received Alberta
Energy and Utilities Board approval for the Muskeg River Mine
Expansion, a 100,000 bbl/d expansion of the oil sands mining and
upgrading facilities (AOSP Expansion 1). After AOSP
Expansion 1, Shell Canadas partners to the joint venture
will no longer have a right to participate in Shell
Canadas upgrading expansion projects. Beyond AOSP
Expansion 1, Shell Canada plans additional oil sands expansions
that the Company estimates could potentially increase its
minable bitumen production to approximately 770,000 bbl/d, which
includes the Muskeg River Mine at 270,000 bbl/d and the Jackpine
Mine at 200,000 bbl/d, both of which have received regulatory
approval. In addition to existing regulatory approvals and
expansion plans, Shell Canadas growth strategy also
includes added mining areas to support expansion of production,
including Pierre River Mine, on the west side of the Athabasca
River, which will expand the production base by 200,000 bbl/d,
as well as further expansion of the Jackpine Mine to 300,000
bbl/d. Shell Canadas current assessment of bitumen in
place to support the proposed expansion of the AOSP is
approximately 6 billion barrels, which brings the
Companys total assessment of bitumen in place for its
approved and proposed minable development of the AOSP to
approximately 10 billion barrels. According to the Company,
the timing of these developments is dependent upon market
conditions, key economic indicators, the ability to meet Shell
Canadas sustainable development criteria and the outcome
of the regulatory process.
The Oil Sands business unit is also responsible for Shell
Canadas Peace River in situ bitumen business. The Shell
Canada Peace River Complex is located in northern Alberta, about
40 kilometres northeast of Peace River. Enhanced oil recovery
techniques involving steam-generated heat and pressure are used
to recover bitumen.
In July 2006, Shell Canada added to its in situ oil sands assets
through its $2.4 billion acquisition of BlackRock.
BlackRocks operations range from conventional heavy oil
production in Alberta to steam assisted gravity drainage
activities in the Alberta oil sands.
Shell Canadas Peace River in situ oil sands assets and the
BlackRock in situ oil sands assets will be referred to herein as
the Other Oil Sands assets. Total average in situ
production from the Other Oil Sands in the fourth quarter of
2006 averaged 20,400 bbl/d.
Shell Canada is also investigating the application of in situ
Upgraded Production (IUP) technology. IUP technology
involves heating the heavy oil bitumen within the ground,
upgrading the oil to a higher quality and allowing it to flow to
the surface.
Exploration and Production
Shell Canada has been engaged in the exploration for and
production of crude oil and natural gas in Canada since 1939.
Shell Canada sold its conventional crude oil producing interests
in 1999. Through its Exploration and Production business unit,
Shell Canada explores for, produces and markets natural gas,
natural gas liquids (ethane, propane, butane, and condensate)
and sulphur from the Foothills region of southern Alberta and
northeastern British Columbia. The Company also has a
31.3 percent share of the Sable Offshore Energy Project,
which produces natural gas and natural gas liquids from
reservoirs located offshore the coast of Nova Scotia. This
business unit also has an unconventional gas segment focused on
basin-centred gas production in the Chinook region of Alberta
and British Columbia and coal bed methane in southeastern and
northwestern British Columbia and the Foothills region of
A-5
Alberta. The Exploration and Production business unit has
secured land positions in a number of frontier regions,
including the following: the Orphan Basin (offshore Newfoundland
and Labrador); the Mackenzie Delta; the Beaufort Sea; and off
the west coast of British Columbia.
Shell Canada operates and has substantial interests in natural
gas plants in Alberta and has substantial interests in natural
gas plants in Nova Scotia, which process approximately
80 percent of its current sales volume. The remaining sales
volumes are processed in other natural gas processing plants in
Alberta, in which Shell Canada has varying interests or to which
it has access under processing agreements.
As of December 31, 2005, the Exploration and Production
business unit had natural gas and natural gas liquids net
reserves (after royalties) that, in aggregate, totalled
251.5 million barrels of oil equivalent (mmboe)
and 14 million long tons of net reserves of sulphur.
The Oil Sands and Exploration and Production business units are
managed and operated by Shell Canada Energy, a partnership
wholly owned by the Company.
Oil Products
Shell Canadas Oil Products business unit is responsible
for the Companys petroleum refining business which
manufactures, distributes and markets refined petroleum
products. Refined petroleum products, as well as specialty items
for the automotive, commercial, farm and home markets, are
marketed across Canada, principally under Shell trademarks.
Shell Canada is also a major supplier of aviation fuels and
lubricants to international and domestic airlines, and of marine
fuels and lubricants to ships in Canadian ports. The Oil
Products business unit also procures crude oil and feedstocks
for Shell Canadas refineries in Montreal, Quebec; Sarnia,
Ontario; and Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta. The refineries
convert crude oil into gasoline, diesel, aviation fuels,
solvents, lubricants, asphalt and heavy fuel oils. Shell Canada
owns three refineries that had 2005 aggregate intake capacity of
approximately 324,000 bbl/d. At year end 2005, the Company had a
Canada-wide network of 1,681 retail sites, many of which include
convenience food stores and car wash facilities. Shell Canada
directly operates 760 of these sites. The Oil Products business
unit is managed and operated through Shell Canada Products, a
partnership wholly owned by the Company.
Trading Range and Volume of Shares
The Common Shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange
(TSX) and trade under the symbol SHC.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the
reported high and low closing prices and the aggregate volume of
trading of the Common Shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSX | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Closing Prices | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Period |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Volume | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January
|
|
$ |
46.90 |
|
|
$ |
40.18 |
|
|
|
10,156,120 |
|
February
|
|
$ |
44.85 |
|
|
$ |
38.15 |
|
|
|
10,353,465 |
|
March
|
|
$ |
41.72 |
|
|
$ |
37.92 |
|
|
|
7,490,277 |
|
April
|
|
$ |
45.84 |
|
|
$ |
41.65 |
|
|
|
7,609,638 |
|
May
|
|
$ |
42.21 |
|
|
$ |
38.08 |
|
|
|
9,860,305 |
|
June
|
|
$ |
41.50 |
|
|
$ |
38.18 |
|
|
|
6,841,513 |
|
July
|
|
$ |
42.50 |
|
|
$ |
38.63 |
|
|
|
8,301,097 |
|
August
|
|
$ |
40.47 |
|
|
$ |
35.80 |
|
|
|
10,004,389 |
|
September
|
|
$ |
36.64 |
|
|
$ |
30.40 |
|
|
|
11,956,141 |
|
October 1 to October 20
|
|
$ |
32.80 |
|
|
$ |
29.14 |
|
|
|
7,906,274 |
|
October 23 to October 31
|
|
$ |
42.91 |
|
|
$ |
42.55 |
|
|
|
41,313,034 |
|
November
|
|
$ |
43.35 |
|
|
$ |
42.68 |
|
|
|
25,636,822 |
|
December
|
|
$ |
43.85 |
|
|
$ |
43.13 |
|
|
|
10,722,307 |
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1 19
|
|
$ |
44.92 |
|
|
$ |
42.40 |
|
|
|
26,701,245 |
|
Source: Bloomberg Financial Markets.
A-6
On October 20, 2006, the trading day immediately prior to
RDS initial announcement that it may pursue an acquisition
of the publicly held Common Shares, the closing price of the
Common Shares on the TSX was $32.80.
Historical Results of Operations
Set out in the tables below are summaries of Shell Canadas
operating and financial results for the last five completed
fiscal years.
Production Data (Net of Royalties)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated) | |
|
|
Natural Gas (mmcf/d)
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
Natural Gas Liquids (mbbl/d)
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
34.4 |
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
|
Bitumen (mbbl/d)
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
88.4 |
|
|
|
103.7 |
|
|
|
93.7 |
|
Crude oil processed by Shell Canada refineries
(m3
/d)
|
|
|
41,400 |
|
|
|
42,900 |
|
|
|
45,100 |
|
|
|
44,900 |
|
|
|
44,600 |
|
Note: mmcf/d = millions of cubic feet per day; mbbl/d =
thousands of barrels per day;
m3/d
= cubic metres per day.
Income and Cash Flow Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated) | |
|
|
|
|
($ millions, except per share amounts) | |
Net Earnings
|
|
$ |
561 |
|
|
$ |
810 |
|
|
$ |
1,286 |
|
|
$ |
2,001 |
|
|
$ |
1,738 |
|
Cash Flow from Operations
|
|
$ |
1,227 |
|
|
$ |
1,701 |
|
|
$ |
2,129 |
|
|
$ |
3,036 |
|
|
$ |
2,614 |
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
$ |
2,289 |
|
|
$ |
713 |
|
|
$ |
951 |
|
|
$ |
1,715 |
|
|
$ |
2,426 |
1 |
Earnings per Share (fully diluted)
|
|
$ |
2.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
$ |
2.40 |
|
|
$ |
2.09 |
|
|
|
1 |
Excludes acquisition of BlackRock. |
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated) | |
|
|
|
|
($ millions) | |
Working
Capital1
|
|
$ |
(1,325 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,091 |
) |
|
$ |
(188 |
) |
|
$ |
933 |
|
|
$ |
(1,714 |
) |
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
9,355 |
|
|
$ |
9,613 |
|
|
$ |
10,906 |
|
|
$ |
13,666 |
|
|
$ |
17,556 |
|
Long-term Debt (excl. Current Portion)
|
|
$ |
523 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
197 |
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
$ |
4,278 |
|
|
$ |
4,075 |
|
|
$ |
4,377 |
|
|
$ |
5,467 |
|
|
$ |
7,976 |
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
$ |
5,077 |
|
|
$ |
5,538 |
|
|
$ |
6,529 |
|
|
$ |
8,199 |
|
|
$ |
9,580 |
|
|
|
1 |
Working capital = current assets - current liabilities. |
Reserves
As of December 31, 2005, Shell Canada had total net proved
reserves of 1,185 billion cubic feet
(bcf ) of natural gas, 54 million barrels
(mmbbls) of natural gas liquids, 774 mmbbls of
bitumen and 14 million long tons of sulphur.
As of December 31, 2005, BlackRock had total net proved
heavy oil reserves of 111 mmbbls and total net proved natural
gas reserves of 2.4 bcf.
A-7
Management has advised CIBC World Markets that the gross proved
conventional reserves as of December 31, 2006 are
approximately 12% lower than those as at December 31, 2005.
Management has also advised that bitumen reserves have increased
significantly as at December 31, 2006 compared to
December 31, 2005.
Landholdings
As of December 31, 2005, Shell Canada had 19.1 million
net acres of undeveloped land (1.9 million acres onshore
within the provinces and 17.2 million acres off the east
and west coasts of Canada and in northern Canada).
As of December 31, 2005, BlackRock had 267,554 net acres of
undeveloped land.
General Approach to Value Analysis
CIBC World Markets approached the value analysis of Shell Canada
in accordance with the Rules, which, in the case of an insider
bid such as the Offer, require the valuator to make a
determination as to the fair market value of the Common Shares.
Rule 61-501
defines fair market value as the monetary
consideration that, in an open and unrestricted market, a
prudent and informed buyer would pay to a prudent and informed
seller, each acting at arms length with the other and
under no compulsion to act, but without making any downward
adjustment to reflect the liquidity of the securities, the
effect of the transaction on the securities or the fact that the
securities do not form part of a controlling interest.
Consequently, this Valuation provides a conclusion on a per
Common Share basis with respect to Shell Canadas en
bloc value, being the price at which all of the Common
Shares could be sold to one or more buyers at the same time.
Our Approach and Valuation Methodologies
CIBC World Markets approached the valuation of the Common Shares
by applying two principal methodologies:
|
|
|
|
i) |
a discounted cash flow (DCF) approach; and |
|
|
ii) |
a sum of the parts net asset value (NAV)
approach. |
In addition, CIBC World Markets reviewed historical trading data
for Shell Canada, bid premia from precedent transactions and
research analyst target prices.
Application of Valuation Methodologies
Discounted Cash Flow Approach
CIBC World Markets prepared a comprehensive DCF analysis of
Shell Canada to assist in determining the fair market value of
the Common Shares. CIBC World Markets believes the DCF approach
is the most appropriate methodology for estimating the en
bloc value of Shell Canada and has benchmarked the results
against other valuation methodologies. We further believe that
the DCF approach is the most broadly used valuation methodology
in the oil and gas industry. The DCF approach reflects the
growth prospects and risks inherent in Shell Canadas
operations by taking into account the future free cash flow
generating capability of its assets.
CIBC World Markets DCF approach involved determining a
present value of the projected unlevered after-tax free cash
flows of the assets contained within the Oil Sands (which
includes both the AOSP and the Other Oil Sands assets) and
Exploration and Production business units over a horizon equal
to the remaining life of each asset utilizing a prescribed
discount rate. For the Companys Oil Products business
unit, the DCF analysis included the projected unlevered
after-tax free cash flows for future years until 2040. A
terminal value was included in year 2041 to represent the
remaining value of these assets. These cash flows and terminal
value were also discounted to present values utilizing a
prescribed discount rate.
As a basis for the development of the projected cash flows,
Shell Canada management prepared three unaudited projected
operational cases: a downside case (the Proven
Case), a base case (the Expected Case) and an
upside case (the Upside Case). The information
supplied consisted of production and throughput volumes, fixed
and variable costs, taxes, royalties, maintenance capital and
anticipated capital expenditures, among other operational and
financial information. The projections were supplied with
sufficient information to allow for the determination of
sensitivities with respect to input variables, including costs,
commodity prices and foreign exchange rates. The three
A-8
cases represent distinct development scenarios that range from a
lower risk Proven Case that approximates proved reserves for
conventional production (and the approximate equivalent for
bitumen reserves which are not recognized by the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC)) to a higher risk
Upside Case that represents the recovery of substantially
greater resources. We applied our professional judgement to the
results of the three cases and weighted the cases to incorporate
the downside, base and upside projections.
The DCF approach requires that numerous assumptions be made
regarding, among other things, production and throughput
volumes, operating, capital and abandonment costs, and terminal
values. The weakness of the DCF approach is the high element of
subjectivity required to generate financial projections over a
long period of time, although this drawback is partially offset
by testing the outcomes under various assumptions and scenarios.
Assumptions
CIBC World Markets DCF analysis is predicated on a number of
important operating assumptions including the extent of
hydrocarbon reserves and resources, production profiles, and
capital cost estimates for development. Shell Canada estimated
such inputs based on its business plan, its operating experience
and its past history with respect to these variables. CIBC World
Markets reviewed these inputs and discussed them with Shell
Canada management. We also benchmarked key variables against
selected industry comparables. As a result of this review and
comparison, certain adjustments were reflected with regard to
these inputs. In addition, CIBC World Markets made a number of
economic assumptions in the DCF analysis.
|
|
|
The three cases assume different resource recovery and
development scenarios for the assets and represent a spectrum of
hydrocarbon volumes to be recovered. The three cases are
characterized as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
Proven Case: This case represents the most conservative
scenario and is based principally on the development of proven
reserves already identified. The estimated reserves to be
recovered are consistent with volumes estimated using the SEC
proven definition with respect to conventional reserves. Volumes
for bitumen were included on the basis of operations from
AOSPs base mine and AOSP Expansion 1. |
|
|
|
Expected Case: This case represents the most likely
development scenario and is based on Shell Canadas
Business Plan as approved by its Board. It represents increased
recovery of conventional and in situ production volumes and the
additional AOSP Expansions 1 through 5 of the mining operations.
This case is consistent with that which has been disclosed to
the investment community. |
|
|
|
Upside Case: This case includes the risked development of
several potential projects, such as AOSP expansion 6 to the
mining operation, the development of Klappan coal bed methane,
the development of certain frontier basins, and the application
of prospective technologies, such as the in situ upgrading
technology. |
|
|
|
The three cases represent a continuum of potential volumes of
hydrocarbon recoveries that range from lower recovery risk to
higher recovery risk. The evaluation of possible resource
recovery is a key determinant in establishing the potential
value of Shell Canada. |
|
|
|
CIBC World Markets reviewed various commodity price information,
including forward strip pricing as of January 19, 2007 and
the current commodity price forecasts used by McDaniel &
Associates Consultants Ltd., Sproule, Paddock
Lindstrom & Associates Ltd., GLJ Petroleum Consultants
Ltd., AJM Petroleum Consultants and DeGolyer and MacNaughton
Canada Limited (collectively, the Independent
Engineers). Based upon our experience with respect to
precedent transactions, industry participant practice and our
review of this information, we determined that an appropriate
forecast could be represented by the average of (i) the
forward strip; and (ii) the average of the Independent
Engineers price forecasts for the period from 2007 to
2011. After 2011, our forecast assumes an annual price increase
of 2%. |
A-9
|
|
|
The following table sets out the commodity price forecast (in
nominal terms) used in our DCF analysis. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil Price | |
|
Natural Gas Price | |
|
Natural Gas Price | |
|
|
(West Texas Intermediate) | |
|
(AECO) | |
|
(Henry Hub) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(US$ per barrel) | |
|
(C$ per gigajoule) | |
|
(US$ per mmbtu) | |
2007
|
|
|
$60.39 |
|
|
|
$6.91 |
|
|
|
$7.38 |
|
2008
|
|
|
$61.64 |
|
|
|
$7.68 |
|
|
|
$8.06 |
|
2009
|
|
|
$60.53 |
|
|
|
$7.62 |
|
|
|
$7.91 |
|
2010
|
|
|
$59.51 |
|
|
|
$7.45 |
|
|
|
$7.70 |
|
2011
|
|
|
$58.88 |
|
|
|
$7.37 |
|
|
|
$7.61 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
+2% per annum |
|
|
|
+2% per annum |
|
|
|
+2% per annum |
|
|
|
iii) |
Refined Product Pricing |
|
|
|
CIBC World Markets used a dynamic pricing model based on inputs
and forecasts provided by Muse Stancil in order to derive
petroleum product pricing forecasts and refining margins for the
Oil Products business unit of Shell Canada. Muse Stancil is a
consulting engineering firm with extensive technical and
commercial experience in the transportation, processing and
marketing sectors of the petroleum, petrochemical and natural
gas industries. The Muse Stancil forecasting methodology is
derived from an analysis of petroleum demand versus refining
capacity in the three major world refining centers: U.S. Gulf
Coast, Rotterdam and Singapore. The price-setting mechanisms are
based on a combination of refining fundamentals and statistical
regression. Parity relationships derived from expected crude and
product flows and based on tariff, freight and quality
differentials are used to derive product prices in other key
markets such as Chicago and New York. Based on the model,
petroleum product prices at each of Shell Canadas
refineries were determined using historical price differentials
in each of those locations versus key markets in the United
States. |
|
|
The operations of each of Shell Canadas refineries are
based on crude oil feedstocks being converted into higher value
refined petroleum products through various processes including
the addition of hydrogen, which results in realizing a
volumetric gain. As a result, the higher value refined product
prices minus the crude oil feedstock costs, adjusted for a
volume increase, are the primary drivers of the margins of the
Oil Products business. Under the Muse Stancil pricing model,
refined products prices are determined based on underlying crude
oil, natural gas and other economic and price inputs. The crude
oil, natural gas and other economic and price inputs were
determined by CIBC World Markets as described above. The refined
product prices along with throughput volumes and costs were
utilized in the DCF to generate cash flows for the Oil Products
business unit. |
iv) Foreign Exchange Rate
|
|
|
CIBC World Markets reviewed the Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar
foreign exchange rate forecasts of a number of large Canadian
and international financial institutions. Based on our review of
these forecasts, we determined that the average of these foreign
exchange rate forecasts was a reasonable estimate of future
foreign exchange rates. The table below sets out the foreign
exchange rate forecast used in our DCF analysis. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Exchange Rate Forecast |
|
|
|
|
|
(US$ per C$) |
2007
|
|
$ |
0.867 |
|
2008
|
|
$ |
0.881 |
|
2009
|
|
$ |
0.860 |
|
2010
|
|
$ |
0.873 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
$ |
0.877 |
|
v) Production and Throughput Volumes
a) Oil
Sands
|
|
|
For the period 2007 through 2011 the forecast production for
AOSP is consistent among the Proven, Expected and Upside Cases.
Annual production volumes are estimated to grow from
approximately 36 million barrels in 2007 to 57 million
barrels in 2011 and continue increasing thereafter commensurate |
A-10
|
|
|
with additional expansions. The Expected and Upside Cases
reflect the addition of upgrading capacity in Alberta and a
Sarnia downstream heavy oil integration strategy
(HOIST) commencing in 2013. |
|
|
With respect to Shell Canadas Other Oil Sands interests,
the annual production volumes under the Expected Case are
estimated to grow from approximately 14 million barrels in
2007 to 31 million barrels in 2011. The production
estimates for the same period for the Proven and Upside Cases
vary from the Expected Case by approximately 20% to 25%. |
b) Exploration
and Production
|
|
|
The Proven Case reflects a blow-down scenario
whereby annual production declines from 43 mmboe in 2007 to 23
mmboe in 2011. The Expected Case is predicated on the 2007
business plan and is modelled based on industry-average finding
costs using third-party benchmarking data. Annual production
volumes increase from 47 mmboe in 2007 to 53 mmboe in 2011 and
decline thereafter. The Upside Case involves the additional
development of risked production from Sable Island, Orphan
Basin, Mackenzie Delta and Klappan. Production is estimated to
increase from 48 mmboe in 2007 to 72 mmboe in 2011 and increase
to a peak production of 141 mmboe in 2020, before declining. |
c) Oil
Products
|
|
|
Average daily throughput volumes for the period 2007 through
2011 are consistent among the three cases. The yield volumes
range from approximately 340,000 bbl/d to 348,000 bbl/d during
the period. In the Expected and Upside Cases, the HOIST project,
which is an integrated upgrading and refining facility located
in Sarnia, Ontario, is assumed to commence operations in 2013.
Coincident with the start-up of the new and expanded facilities,
the existing Sarnia refinery would be shut down. |
vi) Capital Expenditures
|
|
|
Estimates of the capital expenditures required under each of the
Proven Case, Expected Case and Upside Case scenarios were
incorporated into the DCF analysis of each business unit. The
forecast capital expenditures were estimated by the Company and
were based on the forecast expansions and developments. CIBC
World Markets reviewed the capital expenditure forecasts for
each division and compared such to capital expenditure forecasts
of similar completed and anticipated projects. The undiscounted
estimated capital for the Proven, Expected, and Upside Cases for
the life of all projects is approximately $44 billion,
$121 billion and $169 billion, respectively. |
vii) Terminal Values
|
|
|
The financial projections for both the mining and in situ assets
within the Oil Sands business unit and the Exploration and
Production business unit are based on life-of-asset operating
projections. Therefore, no terminal values were accorded to
these assets. |
|
|
In the case of the Oil Products business unit, we have applied a
terminal value in year 2041 to the refining assets to reflect a
going-concern value for the business unit beyond the projection
period. The maintenance capital expenditures utilized in the
projection period are consistent with the assumption that the
refinery assets will have extended life and a terminal value. |
|
|
CIBC World Markets developed terminal values at the end of the
forecast period by calculating the present values utilizing a
terminal growth rate methodology. This methodology uses
unlevered after-tax free cash flows which were projected to
decline to perpetuity on a real basis. In selecting the range of
growth rates, CIBC World Markets took into consideration the
outlook for long-term inflation and the growth prospects of the
Oil Products business unit beyond the terminal year. We also
benchmarked this value using a terminal multiple of cash flow
approach. |
viii) Discount Rate
|
|
|
CIBC World Markets determined an appropriate discount rate based
on a consideration of a number of factors, including: the
theoretical calculation of such rate as described below, a
review of discount rates utilized in or implied by precedent
transactions, a review of the discount rates utilized by equity
research analysts as described in recent published reports on
Shell Canada, and the asset mix of Shell Canada. |
A-11
|
|
|
CIBC World Markets estimated a weighted average cost of capital
(WACC) to discount the projected unlevered after-tax
free cash flows. The Companys after-tax cost of debt and
its cost of equity were weighted based upon an assumed optimal
capital structure. The assumed optimal capital structure was
determined based upon a review of the capital structures of
comparable companies and the risks inherent in the
Companys business and in the oil and gas industry
generally. The cost of debt for the Company was calculated based
on the risk-free rate of return and an estimated borrowing
spread for Shell Canada to reflect credit risk at the assumed
optimal capital structure. The balance of the capitalization is
represented by common equity, the cost of which was estimated
using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). CAPM
generates a cost of equity by adding a risk-free rate of return
to a premium that represents the financial and non-diversifiable
business risk of the security in question. This premium is the
product of a securitys beta (a statistical measure which
reflects the extent to which a securitys returns co-vary
with those of a broader market index) multiplied by a broader
market premium (equal to the amount by which the market as a
whole has yielded returns in excess of the risk-free rate). CIBC
World Markets carried out a series of calculations and consulted
certain third-party sources in estimating a beta for Shell
Canada and a number of comparable companies. The cost of equity
derived from CAPM does not account for the comparatively lower
risk of investing in larger capitalization companies, even after
adjusting for their systematic (or beta) risk. Consequently, the
estimated cost of equity includes a discount that reflects Shell
Canadas comparative size. |
|
|
The assumptions used by CIBC World Markets in estimating the
WACC for the Company were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Debt
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
Rate1
|
|
|
4.9% |
|
Borrowing Spread
|
|
|
0.8% |
|
Pre-tax Cost of Debt
|
|
|
5.6% |
|
Tax
Rate2
|
|
|
30.0% |
|
After-tax Cost of Debt
|
|
|
3.9% |
|
Cost of Common Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
Rate1
|
|
|
4.9% |
|
Market Risk
Premium3
|
|
|
7.1% |
|
Levered
Beta4
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Size
Premium/(Discount)3
|
|
|
(0.4%) |
|
Cost of Common Equity
|
|
|
9.0% |
|
WACC
|
|
|
|
|
Optimal Capital Structure (Debt/ Equity)
|
|
|
15.0% |
|
WACC
|
|
|
8.4% |
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on a 30-year generic United States government treasury
bond as of January 19, 2007. |
|
2 |
Based on discussions with Shell Canada management. |
|
3 |
Based on U.S. data compiled by Ibbotson Associates for the
period from 1926 to 2005 in its 2006 Yearbook. |
|
4 |
Analysis of betas for Shell Canada and selected comparable
companies relative to the S&P500 Index. |
Note: Numbers shown above are rounded.
|
|
|
In addition to the calculation outlined above, we also examined
the discount rate assumptions utilized by selected equity
research analysts covering Shell Canada. The after-tax discount
rates ranged from 6.7% to 9.0% and averaged 8.0%, with
approximately two-thirds of analysts using 8.0% as their
discount rate for Shell Canada. |
|
|
CIBC World Markets believes that the discount rates calculated
above and utilized by equity research analysts covering Shell
Canada are consistent with discount rates used by many companies
transacting in this sector for comparable companies and assets. |
|
|
Based upon the foregoing, CIBC World Markets determined the
appropriate WACC for the Company to be in the range of 8.0% to
8.5%. |
A-12
Summary of Projections
Under the Expected Case, and utilizing the commodity price and
financial assumptions we determined, the undiscounted operating
cash flow is estimated to aggregate to $393 billion for the
lives of the assets. The aggregate estimated undiscounted
capital expenditures are $121 billion. Many of the capital
expenditures occur in the earlier years to fund development of
assets. Under the Expected Case, the Company is estimated to
achieve positive free cash flow, on a cumulative basis, in the
year 2018. The table below illustrates the operating cash flow,
capital expenditures, and the free cash flow forecasts for the
next five years and the aggregate amounts for the projection
periods.
Total Corporate Undiscounted Free Cash Flow Summary (Expected
Case)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Over | |
|
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
2010 | |
|
2011 | |
|
Projection Periods | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ millions) | |
Operating Cash Flow
|
|
$ |
3,174 |
|
|
$ |
3,236 |
|
|
$ |
2,349 |
|
|
$ |
3,988 |
|
|
$ |
5,507 |
|
|
$ |
392,987 |
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
|
3,332 |
|
|
|
4,155 |
|
|
|
5,182 |
|
|
|
6,365 |
|
|
|
8,695 |
|
|
|
120,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free Cash
Flow1
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
(919 |
) |
|
|
(2,833 |
) |
|
|
(2,377 |
) |
|
|
(3,188 |
) |
|
|
272,465 |
|
|
|
1 |
Free cash flow is defined as undiscounted unlevered operating
cash flow (after tax) less undiscounted capital expenditures. |
Note: The 2009 cash flow reflects impact of tax.
Summary of DCF Analysis
CIBC World Markets relied primarily on the Expected Case,
applying a weighting of approximately 70%. A weighting of
approximately 15% was accorded to each of the Proven and Upside
Cases. The present value of the unlevered after-tax free cash
flows derived from the DCF analysis represents the aggregate
value of Shell Canadas operating assets. To arrive at an
equity value, and subsequently an equity value per Common Share,
CIBC World Markets has made a number of adjustments. These
adjustments included, among other things, adjustments for net
debt as of December 31, 2006, potential future tax deferred
benefits, certain inventory adjustments, present value of
unfunded pension liabilities and the estimated present value of
future asset retirement obligations not already reflected in the
DCF analysis.
Summary of Weighted DCF Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WACC | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8.5% | |
|
8.0% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ millions, except per | |
|
|
Common Share | |
|
|
amounts) | |
Present Value of Free Cash
Flow1
|
|
$ |
36,925 |
|
|
$ |
41,449 |
|
Less: Debt and Working Capital
Deficit2
|
|
$ |
(1,911 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,911 |
) |
Plus: Option
Proceeds3
|
|
$ |
520 |
|
|
$ |
520 |
|
|
Other
Adjustments4
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Equity Value
|
|
$ |
35,628 |
|
|
$ |
40,152 |
|
Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding (mm)
|
|
|
847.0 |
|
|
|
847.0 |
|
Estimated DCF Value per Common Share
|
|
$ |
42.06 |
|
|
$ |
47.40 |
|
|
|
1 |
Based on weighted average of Proven Case (15%), Expected Case
(70%), and Upside Case (15%). |
|
2 |
As per December 31, 2006 unaudited financials. |
|
3 |
Source: Shell Canada option schedule. |
|
4 |
Includes unfunded pension liability, asset retirement
obligations and certain inventory adjustments. |
The equity value per Common Share was determined to be in the
range of approximately $42 to $47.
A-13
Sensitivity Analysis
The following table demonstrates the impact on Shell
Canadas estimated equity value per Common Share of
changing key economic variables contained within the DCF
analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Value | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact per | |
|
|
Variable |
|
Change | |
|
Common Share1 | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Price of Oil (WTI)
|
|
|
+US$1.00/bbl |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
|
4.1% |
|
Price of Gas (AECO)
|
|
|
+C$0.25/GJ |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.7% |
|
Light/ Heavy Differential
|
|
|
+US$1.00/bbl |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.1% |
|
Capital Costs
|
|
|
+5% |
|
|
$ |
(2.42 |
) |
|
|
(5.6)% |
|
WACC
|
|
|
+0.25% |
|
|
$ |
(2.59 |
) |
|
|
(6.0)% |
|
CAD/ USD Exchange Rate
|
|
|
+C$0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(1.29 |
) |
|
|
(3.0)% |
|
|
|
1 |
Using mid-point WACC of 8.25% and a weighting of Proven,
Expected and Upside Cases. |
Sum of the Parts Net Asset Value
Approach
Using the NAV approach, a value for the Company is estimated by
separately considering the value of each operating, development,
exploration and financial asset. The individual asset values are
estimated utilizing primarily precedent transaction and
comparable company trading analyses.
The market trading multiples of public companies that operate in
businesses similar to those of Shell Canada were reviewed and
used to estimate individual asset values. The multiples used
included measures of i) total enterprise value (TEV)
to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization (EBITDA) referred to as TEV/
EBITDA, ii) Adjusted TEV to the quantity of net proved
reserves (Adjusted TEV/ Net Proved Reserve), and
iii) Adjusted TEV to barrels per day of net current production
(Adjusted TEV/ Net Current Production). Each of
these multiples is frequently observed by industry participants
and the investment community as key measures for valuing assets
or companies in various sectors of the oil and gas industry.
The results of the comparable companies approach were adjusted
for a premium based on comparable change-of-control transactions
to reflect an en bloc value for each of the assets.
We applied premia to TEV in our analysis for the various assets
given that Shell Canadas net debt is held at the corporate
level and not allocated to any particular asset or division.
This methodology is further supported by the fact that Shell
Canada has relatively low debt. We reviewed both the premia to
market trading values for shares and premia to TEV of a number
of precedent transactions in the Canadian oil and gas industry
and for other large Canadian acquisition transactions to
determine appropriate premia with regard to Shell Canadas
assets.
The precedent transaction method considers transaction prices in
the context of the purchase or sale of a comparable company or
asset to estimate the en bloc value of a particular
asset. The prices paid for companies and assets in various
sectors of the oil and gas industry which are subject to
arms length transactions provide a general measure of the
relative value. Factors such as comparability of asset and
commodity mix, asset quality and profitability, stage of
development, brand recognition, location and size may all be
considered. For purposes of this analysis and depending on the
asset, the multiples reviewed include the following: TEV/
EBITDA, TEV/ Net Proved Reserve, TEV/ Net Current Production and
TEV to refining input capacity (TEV/ Refining Input
Capacity).
We also estimated the value of certain cost savings (referred to
as the Go to Market cost savings)
expected to be realized from specified initiatives in the Oil
Products business unit. Further, we considered the value of
corporate expenses not allocated to any particular division.
Under the NAV approach, the estimated value for each asset is
summed to produce a total asset value. To arrive at a net asset
value, we deducted the Companys net debt and an estimate
of the present value of corporate expenses that are not directly
assignable to each individual asset. We also adjusted to account
for the proceeds received upon the exercise of stock options and
other employee stock incentive plans in order to arrive at an
equity value per Common Share.
A-14
There are a limited number of companies directly comparable to
Shell Canadas assets. The entities reviewed in the
comparable companies method may have different operating,
geographical and size profiles than the assets of Shell Canada.
In addition, certain of the precedent transactions that were
surveyed were executed at different points during commodity
pricing cycles, and many of the companies or assets that have
been acquired have different operating profiles than the assets
of Shell Canada. For these reasons, the NAV approach has been
attributed a lower weighting in our analysis than the DCF
approach.
AOSP
In our NAV approach to valuing Shell Canadas
60 percent interest in the AOSP we examined both the
comparable companies and the precedent transaction methods.
i) Comparable Companies Methodology
|
|
|
In applying this valuation technique to Shell Canadas
60 percent interest in the AOSP, we reviewed the trading
value of Western Oil Sands L.P. (Western Oil Sands),
which holds a 20 percent interest in the AOSP and in other
assets that we deemed immaterial for purposes of our analysis.
Western Oil Sands unaffected total enterprise value is
$5.3 billion (equates to a share price of $28.51). This
value was calculated based on the trading value of Western Oil
Sands shares for the five-trading days prior to and
including November 3, 2006, which is the day prior to
market speculation that Western Oil Sands had initiated a
strategic review process. Our notional value analysis for Shell
Canadas AOSP interest assumes there is incremental value
associated with Shell Canadas interest (relative to
Western Oil Sands interest) because Shell Canada has its
own upgrading solution for its share of bitumen produced from
the project post the completion of the AOSP Expansion 1 and
because Shell Canada is the operator of the AOSP. As a result,
we have added a 5% premium to the value calculated using Western
Oil Sands unaffected TEV. |
|
|
Accordingly, the market trading value of Shell Canadas
interest in the AOSP was estimated to be approximately
$16.8 billion. We adjusted this market trading value for an
en bloc premium. We concluded that a premium of 20%
to 30% was appropriate. Consequently, we derived a range of
en bloc values for Shell Canadas AOSP
interests of $20.1 billion to $21.8 billion. |
AOSP Comparable Company Trading Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiplication | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Factor2 | |
|
Estimated Value | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Methodology |
|
|
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
($ millions, except multiple ranges and | |
|
|
|
|
where otherwise noted) | |
Western Oil Sands Unaffected
TEV1
|
|
$ |
5,318mm |
|
|
|
3.15x |
|
|
|
3.15x |
|
|
$ |
16,752 |
|
|
$ |
16,752 |
|
Plus: Control Premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20% |
|
|
|
30% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
En Bloc Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,102 |
|
|
$ |
21,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Based on trading prices for Western Oil Sands common
shares for the five trading days prior to and including
November 3, 2006. |
|
2 |
Reflects 60% ownership relative to Western Oil Sands 20%,
and as adjusted for a 5% premium. |
ii) Precedent Transaction Methodology
|
|
|
We examined the recent acquisitions of interests in the Syncrude
Canada Limited Joint Venture (Syncrude), an oil
sands mining project comparable in size and scope to AOSP.
Canadian Oil Sands Trust (COS) concluded
acquisitions of Syncrude interests from EnCana Corporation in
2003 and from Talisman Energy Inc. (Talisman) in
January 2007. Given the significant changes in the market for
oil sands assets during the last few years, CIBC World Markets
focused its analysis on the most recent transaction, being
COS purchase of an indirect 1.25% Syncrude interest from
Talisman. Our analysis considered, among other things, the
following factors: i) that both AOSP and Syncrude are integrated
mining and upgrading projects with significant expansion
opportunities and production histories, ii) that the Syncrude
interest purchased by COS from Talisman was subject to certain
royalty burdens, iii) that AOSP and Syncrude, while similar in
many respects, have differences with |
A-15
|
|
|
regard to operating and capital cost structures, upgrading
process and other variables and iv) that the Talisman/ COS
transaction was not a control transaction. |
|
|
We estimated the price per equivalent barrel of production and
price per estimated barrel of recoverable resource for the
Talisman/ COS transaction. We applied more weight to the
production metric methodology. Application of these metrics to
current production and estimated recoverable resource for Shell
Canadas AOSP interest resulted in values which supported
the analysis derived under the comparable company trading
analysis. |
Other Oil Sands
The Other Oil Sands division is comprised of those assets
acquired in the purchase of BlackRock and assets previously
owned by the Company (the Original Assets). The
assets acquired from BlackRock and the Original Assets are
located in close geographic proximity to each other and have
many geological similarities. They comprise both proved reserves
and recoverable resources, which exceed 2 billion barrels,
in the aggregate.
Shell Canada acquired BlackRock for $2.4 billion in July
2006. Given the timing of this acquisition and the oil sands
expertise, technological capability, and financial strength of
the Company, we have concluded that the purchase price continues
to represent a reasonable value for the BlackRock assets. We
prorated the BlackRock value over the Original Assets using
implied metrics per unit of reserves and recoverable resource.
We believe our analysis included value for the entire asset and
therefore no additional land value has been accorded.
Specifically, we estimated the value per unit of gross proved
reserves and per unit of recoverable resource implied by the
acquisition of BlackRock. These estimated unit values were
applied to the gross proved reserves and estimated recoverable
resource volumes for the Original Assets. The value determined
for these Original Assets was added to the $2.4 billion
BlackRock value to derive an estimated value for the
Companys Other Oil Sands assets in the range of
$3.4 billion to $3.8 billion.
We also analyzed trading metrics of selected public companies
with pre-production oil sands assets as a check. These companies
included OPTI Canada Inc., UTS Energy Inc. and Synenco Energy
Ltd.
Exploration and Production
In the NAV approach for Shell Canadas Exploration and
Production assets we considered both the comparable companies
method and the precedent transactions method.
i) Comparable Companies Methodology
|
|
|
In applying this valuation technique we reviewed the trading
multiples of comparable North American natural-gas weighted
exploration and production companies with operations in the
Foothills region of Alberta and the Rocky Mountain region of the
United States. CIBC World Markets believes that the multiples
for the large capitalization companies are the most appropriate
for the purpose of evaluating the Exploration and Production
business unit, given the comparable size, quality and nature of
the respective asset bases. |
A-16
Selected Comparable Exploration and Production Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEV3 | |
|
Adjusted TEV4 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Market | |
|
|
|
2006E | |
|
Net Proved | |
|
Net Current | |
|
|
Share Price1 | |
|
Capitalization2 | |
|
TEV3 | |
|
EBITDA6 | |
|
Reserve5 | |
|
Production5 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(C$ unless noted) | |
|
(C$MM) | |
|
(C$MM) | |
|
|
|
(C$/boe) | |
|
(C$/boe/d) | |
Large Capitalization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EnCana
Corporation7
|
|
US$ |
46.64 |
|
|
$ |
44,137 |
|
|
$ |
50,993 |
|
|
|
4.6x |
|
|
$ |
15.43 |
|
|
$ |
67,009 |
|
|
Devon Energy
Corp.7
|
|
US$ |
67.66 |
|
|
$ |
35,741 |
|
|
$ |
43,774 |
|
|
|
5.1x |
|
|
$ |
18.61 |
|
|
$ |
69,774 |
|
|
XTO Energy
Inc.7
|
|
US$ |
47.57 |
|
|
$ |
20,858 |
|
|
$ |
24,547 |
|
|
|
6.0x |
|
|
$ |
18.82 |
|
|
$ |
94,544 |
|
|
EOG Resources
Inc.7
|
|
US$ |
64.73 |
|
|
$ |
19,018 |
|
|
$ |
19,582 |
|
|
|
5.9x |
|
|
$ |
18.40 |
|
|
$ |
72,719 |
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4x |
|
|
$ |
17.82 |
|
|
$ |
76,012 |
|
Median
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5x |
|
|
$ |
18.51 |
|
|
$ |
71,247 |
|
Small Capitalization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Mary Land and Exploration
Co.7
|
|
US$ |
34.94 |
|
|
$ |
2,333 |
|
|
$ |
2,790 |
|
|
|
4.6x |
|
|
$ |
18.59 |
|
|
$ |
60,114 |
|
|
Compton Petroleum Corp.
|
|
C$ |
10.54 |
|
|
$ |
1,386 |
|
|
$ |
2,182 |
|
|
|
6.5x |
|
|
$ |
19.58 |
|
|
$ |
82,478 |
|
|
Bill Barrett
Corp.7
|
|
US$ |
28.54 |
|
|
$ |
1,484 |
|
|
$ |
1,691 |
|
|
|
5.8x |
|
|
$ |
21.76 |
|
|
$ |
59,860 |
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7x |
|
|
$ |
19.98 |
|
|
$ |
67,484 |
|
Median
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8x |
|
|
$ |
19.58 |
|
|
$ |
60,114 |
|
|
|
1 |
Price data sourced from Bloomberg Financial Markets as of
January 19, 2007. |
|
2 |
Calculated as of January 19, 2007 based on fully diluted
shares outstanding using the treasury stock method. |
|
3 |
Calculated as: market capitalization + net debt (total long-term
debt +/- net working capital deficit/ surplus) + preferred
shares. |
|
4 |
Adjusted TEV reflects adjustments for undeveloped land. |
|
5 |
Reserves net of royalties as at December 31, 2005, adjusted
for any subsequent acquisitions and dispositions to date. Net
current production data based on latest available public
disclosure. |
|
6 |
Estimates sourced from I/ B/ E/ S. |
|
7 |
U.S. prices converted at the January 19, 2007 exchange rate
US$ per C$ of 0.85. |
|
|
|
While none of the companies reviewed was considered directly
comparable to the Exploration and Production business unit, CIBC
World Markets selected what it considered to be reasonably
representative trading multiples for seven publicly traded
companies. CIBC World Markets believes the TEV/ EBITDA, TEV/ Net
Proven Reserve and TEV/ Net Current Production multiples to be
the most appropriate multiples to evaluate the Exploration and
Production business unit. |
|
|
In selecting the multiple ranges shown below, CIBC World Markets
gave consideration to several factors, including asset and
commodity risk, asset quality, growth potential, profitability
and size of the Exploration and Production business unit and the
selected comparable companies reviewed. |
|
|
As shown in the table below, an average of the values realized
by applying each of these three multiple ranges suggests a
trading market value of the Exploration and Production business
unit of $5.1 billion to $6.0 billion, excluding
undeveloped land. We adjusted the market-based value by applying
a premium to reflect an en bloc value. After having
surveyed recent Canadian-based oil and gas transactions and
large company transactions in other sectors, we concluded that a
TEV premium of 20% to 30% was appropriate. Consequently, we
derived a range of en bloc values for Shell
Canadas Exploration and Production business unit
(excluding undeveloped land) using the comparable companies
methodology of $6.1 billion to $7.8 billion. |
A-17
Exploration and Production Comparable Company
Trading Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple Range | |
|
Value | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Methodology |
|
Shell Canada Data | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
($ millions, except multiple ranges and | |
|
|
|
|
where otherwise noted) | |
TEV/2006 EBITDA
|
|
$ |
1,060 mm |
|
|
|
4.5x |
|
|
|
5.5x |
|
|
$ |
4,770 |
|
|
$ |
5,830 |
|
Adjusted TEV/Net Proven Reserves
|
|
|
252 mmboe |
|
|
$ |
16.50 |
|
|
$ |
20.00 |
|
|
$ |
4,150 |
|
|
$ |
5,030 |
|
Adjusted TEV/Net Current
Production1
|
|
|
96,233 boe/d |
|
|
$ |
65,000 |
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,255 |
|
|
$ |
7,217 |
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,058 |
|
|
$ |
6,026 |
|
Plus: Control Premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20% |
|
|
|
30% |
|
En Bloc Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,069 |
|
|
$ |
7,834 |
|
|
|
1 |
Net daily production for the fourth quarter of 2006. |
ii) Precedent Transactions Methodology
|
|
|
In applying this valuation technique, CIBC World Markets
reviewed comparable acquisition transactions involving companies
in the oil and gas industry and for which there was sufficient
public information to derive multiples. CIBC World Markets
considered the differences in asset and commodity mix, market
dynamics and economic environment at the time of each
transaction, growth prospects and other factors inherent in the
precedent transactions identified. The five selected
transactions we considered are shown in the table below. |
Exploration and Production Selected Precedent
Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted TEV | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset/ | |
|
Transaction | |
|
Proved | |
|
Net Current | |
Date |
|
Acquiror |
|
Target |
|
Corporate | |
|
Value1 | |
|
Reserves2 | |
|
Production2 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($MM) | |
|
($/net boe) | |
|
($/net boe/d) | |
Sep-06
|
|
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. |
|
Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (Canada) |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
$ |
4,551 |
|
|
$ |
16.06 |
|
|
$ |
74,266 |
|
Jun-06
|
|
Anadarko Petroleum Corp. |
|
Western Gas Resources Inc. |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
$ |
5,912 |
|
|
$ |
18.73 |
|
|
$ |
83,666 |
|
Jul-05
|
|
Pogo Producing Company |
|
Northrock Resources Ltd. |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
$ |
2,070 |
|
|
$ |
17.59 |
|
|
$ |
62,576 |
|
May-05
|
|
Total S.A. / ConocoPhillips |
|
Devon Energy Corp. |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
$ |
1,416 |
|
|
$ |
18.16 |
|
|
$ |
80,774 |
|
Apr-04
|
|
EnCana Corporation |
|
Tom Brown Inc. |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
$ |
3,685 |
|
|
$ |
17.77 |
|
|
$ |
61,905 |
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17.66 |
|
|
$ |
72,637 |
|
Median
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17.77 |
|
|
$ |
74,266 |
|
Source: J.S. Herold Inc. and public data. Production and reserve
figures reported on a net basis (adjusted for royalties) based
on J.S. Herold Inc. methodology.
|
|
1 |
J.S. Herold Inc. transaction value adjusted for C$ per US$
exchange rate on the day of the announcement. |
|
2 |
Production and reserve multiples adjusted for non-producing
assets at the time of the acquisition based on J.S. Herold Inc.
methodology. |
|
|
|
CIBC World Markets considered Adjusted TEV/ Net Current
Production and to a lesser extent Adjusted TEV/ Net Proved
Reserves to be the most appropriate multiples to estimate a
value for the Exploration and Production business unit. The
multiple ranges to be applied to the Exploration and Production
business unit were determined based on our assessment of the
relative quality and nature of the assets compared to those for
the precedent transactions. |
|
|
The following is a summary of the value of the Exploration and
Production business unit (excluding undeveloped land). As
illustrated, these multiple ranges suggest that the en
bloc value for the Exploration and Production business
unit (excluding undeveloped land) is between $5.5 billion
and $6.4 billion. |
A-18
Exploration and Production Precedent Transaction
Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple Range | |
|
Value | |
|
|
|
|
Shell Canada | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Methodology |
|
Data | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
Weighting | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
($ millions, except multiple ranges and where otherwise noted) | |
Adj. TEV/Net Proved Reserve
|
|
|
252 mmboe |
|
|
$ |
16.00 |
|
|
$ |
19.00 |
|
|
$ |
4,024 |
|
|
$ |
4,779 |
|
|
|
33% |
|
Adj. TEV/Net Current Production
1
|
|
|
96,233 boe/d |
|
|
$ |
65,000 |
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,255 |
|
|
$ |
7,217 |
|
|
|
67% |
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,511 |
|
|
$ |
6,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Net production for the fourth quarter of 2006. |
Summary: NAV
Approach Exploration and Production
|
|
|
In the NAV approach to the Exploration and Production business
unit, we have applied equal weighting to both the comparable
companies method and the precedent transactions method to arrive
at an estimated en bloc value for the Exploration
and Production business unit (excluding undeveloped land) of
approximately $5.8 billion to $7.1 billion. |
Exploration and Production Value Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Value | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Methodology |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
Weighting | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ millions) | |
Comparable Company Analysis
|
|
$ |
6,069 |
|
|
$ |
7,834 |
|
|
|
50% |
|
|
$ |
3,035 |
|
|
$ |
3,917 |
|
Precedent Transaction Analysis
|
|
$ |
5,511 |
|
|
$ |
6,404 |
|
|
|
50% |
|
|
$ |
2,756 |
|
|
$ |
3,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
En Bloc Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,791 |
|
|
$ |
7,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undeveloped Acreage and Frontier Assets
The values estimated for the Exploration and Production business
unit exclude the value of any undeveloped land, comprising both
conventional and unconventional lands and non-producing frontier
assets. Our NAV approach to valuing these assets focused on the
precedent transactions method.
i) Precedent Transactions Methodology
|
|
|
In applying this valuation technique, we reviewed recent land
sales transactions and work expenditure commitment transactions
for various regions in Canada as well as actual prices paid by
Shell Canada for land purchased since January 2005. |
|
|
The price paid in 2006 for conventional undeveloped land in
Alberta ranged from $0.51 per acre to $10,188 per acre with an
average of approximately $220 per acre. According to the
Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Board, work expenditure
commitments since 2005 have ranged from $1 per acre to $6,650
per acre, with a weighted average of $79 per acre. Meanwhile,
according to the Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board, there
have been no work expenditure commitments for acreage offshore
Nova Scotia since 2003 when the average expenditure commitment
was $31 per acre. According to data compiled by Indian and
Northern Affairs Canada, work expenditure commitments have a
weighted average of $355 per acre in the Mackenzie Delta region
since 2002 and $40 per acre in the Beaufort region over the same
time period. Acreage off of the west coast of British Columbia
where Shell Canada owns approximately 12.8 million acres
has been subject to a moratorium on development since 1971 and
there are no recent precedent transactions for acreage in this
area. As well, there have been no work commitments for acreage
in the Arctic Islands / Nunavut region since at least 2001. |
|
|
Shell Canadas acquisition costs of exploration and
development lands, on a weighted average basis, have been $1,028
per acre (range of $11 to $6,334 per acre) since 2005. |
|
|
After reviewing these precedent transactions, we determined
appropriate values per acre for Shell Canadas undeveloped
acreage and non-producing frontier lands. A summary of this
analysis is presented below. |
A-19
Frontier and Undeveloped Land Value Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value Range/Acre | |
|
Value | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Shell Canada Data | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(000s of net acres) | |
|
($/acre) | |
|
($/acre) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions, except where otherwise noted) | |
Conventional Lands
|
|
|
601.9 |
|
|
$ |
565 |
|
|
$ |
665 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
Coal Bed Methane Lands
|
|
|
1,066.3 |
|
|
$ |
900 |
|
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
$ |
960 |
|
|
$ |
1,173 |
|
Offshore and Frontier
Lands1
|
|
|
17,495.2 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
$ |
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Land Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,476 |
|
|
$ |
1,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Includes acreage off the eastern and western coasts of Canada as
well as in the Mackenzie Delta, Beaufort and Arctic Islands /
Nunavut regions of northern Canada. Value range reflects the mix
of offshore holdings, including the fact that approximately 12.8
mm acres are currently subject to a moratorium on development.
Land data as at October 10, 2006. |
|
|
|
Based upon the analysis above, we derived a value range for
Shell Canadas non-producing frontier assets and
undeveloped acreage of $1.5 billion to $1.8 billion. |
Oil Products
In our NAV approach for Shell Canadas Oil Products
business unit we examined both the comparable companies method
and the precedent transactions method.
i) Comparable Companies Methodology
|
|
|
In applying this valuation technique we reviewed the trading
multiples of comparable North American refining and marketing
companies, which are shown in the table below. |
Selected Comparable Oil Products Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEV | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Share | |
|
Market | |
|
|
|
2007E | |
|
|
Price1 | |
|
Capitalization2 | |
|
TEV3 | |
|
EBITDA6 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(US$) | |
|
(C$MM) | |
|
(C$MM) | |
|
|
Refiners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valero Energy
Corp.4,5
|
|
$ |
51.04 |
|
|
$ |
37,803 |
|
|
$ |
41,475 |
|
|
|
4.5x |
|
|
Sunoco
Inc.4
|
|
$ |
60.28 |
|
|
$ |
8,727 |
|
|
$ |
11,938 |
|
|
|
5.2x |
|
|
Western Refining
Inc.4
|
|
$ |
25.89 |
|
|
$ |
2,122 |
|
|
$ |
1,827 |
|
|
|
6.3x |
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3x |
|
|
|
1 |
Price data sourced from Bloomberg Financial Markets as of
January 19, 2007. |
|
2 |
Calculated as of January 19, 2007 based on fully diluted
shares outstanding using the treasury stock method. |
|
3 |
Calculated as: market cap + net debt (total long term debt +/-
net working capital deficit/surplus) + minority interest +
preferred shares. |
|
4 |
U.S. companies converted at the January 19, 2007
US$ per C$ exchange rate of 0.85. |
|
5 |
Minority interest excluded as analyst community reports EBITDA
net of equity interest in Valero GP Holdings, LLC. |
|
6 |
Estimates sourced from I/ B/ E/ S. |
|
|
|
CIBC World Markets selected what it considered to be reasonably
representative public trading multiples for the three
publicly-traded companies referred to above. The TEV to
estimated EBITDA multiple for 2007 was determined to be the most
comparable trading multiple for the Oil Products business unit. |
|
|
In selecting the multiple range shown below, CIBC World Markets
gave consideration to several factors, including quality of
assets, asset mix, growth potential, profitability and size
differential between the Oil Products business unit and the
companies reviewed. We also considered the relative high quality
of Shell Canadas Scotford refinery and the potential
EBITDA growth for the Oil Products business unit. The values
determined were adjusted by control premia of 20%
30% to reflect en bloc values for the Oil Products
assets, as indicated in the table below. |
A-20
Oil Products Comparable Company Trading
Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range | |
|
Value | |
|
|
Shell Canada | |
|
| |
|
| |
Methodology |
|
Data1 | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
($ millions, except multiple ranges and | |
|
|
|
|
where otherwise noted) | |
TEV/2007E EBITDA
|
|
$ |
1,262 mm |
|
|
|
5.0x |
|
|
|
6.0x |
|
|
$ |
6,310 |
|
|
$ |
7,572 |
|
Plus: Control Premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20% |
|
|
|
30% |
|
En Bloc Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,572 |
|
|
$ |
9,844 |
|
|
|
1 |
2007 estimate adjusted for Go to Market cost savings
which have been accounted for separately in the NAV analysis. |
ii) Precedent Transactions Methodology
|
|
|
In applying this valuation technique, CIBC World Markets
reviewed selected precedent North American acquisitions of
refining and marketing assets or companies that were comparable
and for which there was sufficient public information to derive
multiples. CIBC World Markets considered the differences in
asset and commodity mix, asset quality, market dynamics and
economic environment at the time of each transaction, growth
prospects and other factors inherent in the precedent
transactions identified. Nine transactions were considered
comparable for our analysis as shown in the table below. |
Oil Products Selected Precedent Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEV/ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining | |
|
|
|
Refining | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset/ | |
|
Intake | |
|
TEV/ | |
|
Intake | |
Date |
|
Acquiror |
|
Target |
|
Corporate | |
|
Capacity | |
|
EBITDA1 | |
|
Capacity | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Mbbl/d) | |
|
|
|
(C$/bbl/d) | |
Oct-06
|
|
EnCana Corp. |
|
ConocoPhillips |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
n.a. |
|
|
$ |
13,936 |
|
Aug-06
|
|
Western Refining Inc.
5 |
|
Giant Industries Inc. |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
5.1x |
|
|
$ |
12,234 |
|
Aug-06
|
|
Harvest Energy
Trust2 |
|
North Atlantic Refining Ltd. |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
3.5x |
|
|
$ |
13,880 |
|
Aug-06
|
|
Lyondell Chemical Co.
2 |
|
Citgo Petroleum Corp. |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
3.7x |
|
|
$ |
21,533 |
|
May-06
|
|
Alon USA Inc. |
|
Paramount Petroleum Corp. |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
4.4x |
|
|
$ |
6,985 |
|
Apr-05
|
|
Marathon Oil
Corp.3 |
|
Ashland Inc. |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
5.2x |
|
|
$ |
9,718 |
|
Apr-05
|
|
Valero Energy Corp. |
|
Premcor Inc. |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
7.0x |
|
|
$ |
14,447 |
|
Jan-04
|
|
Premcor Inc. |
|
Saudi Aramco and Shell Oil |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
n.a. |
|
|
$ |
6,480 |
|
May-03
|
|
Valero Energy
Corp.4 |
|
Orion Refining Corp. |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
4.7x |
|
|
$ |
3,892 |
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8x |
|
|
$ |
11,456 |
|
Median
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7x |
|
|
$ |
12,234 |
|
Source: J.S. Herold Inc. and public data. Transaction value
adjusted for C$ per US$ exchange rate on the day of the
announcement; trailing EBITDA converted at average rate for
trailing 12 months.
|
|
1 |
EBITDA reflects trailing 12 months based on most recent
available quarterly data prior to the announcement of the
transaction. |
|
2 |
Based on most recent six months EBITDA annualized. |
|
3 |
TEV/EBITDA multiple excludes US$94 million for the chemical
business and Valvoline oil change centers. |
|
4 |
Estimated EBITDA figure. |
|
5 |
Transaction closing is pending. |
Notes: Refining capacity based on crude processing capacity.
|
|
|
CIBC World Markets considered TEV/ EBITDA and TEV/ Refining
Intake Capacity to be the most appropriate multiples to evaluate
the Oil Products business unit. |
|
|
In selecting the multiple ranges shown below, CIBC World Markets
gave consideration to several factors, including differences in
business mix, growth potential, age of assets, asset quality,
profitability and size between the Oil Products business unit
and the companies/assets reviewed. |
A-21
|
|
|
The TEV/ Refining Intake Capacity does not include any value for
Shell Canadas retail service stations. CIBC World Markets
reviewed 27 precedent transactions involving the acquisition of
retail service stations. The purchase price per station in these
transactions ranged from approximately $81,000 to
$5.0 million. The average purchase price, excluding the
high and low values, was $1.3 million per station. Based
upon a review of these precedent transactions and Shell
Canadas analyses of its owned stations, we have estimated
a value of between $860 million and $1.3 billion for
the retail station network. This additional value was added to
the value derived using the TEV/ Refining Intake Capacity
multiple, as illustrated in the table below. |
Oil Products Precedent Transaction Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental Value of Retail | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple Range | |
|
Sites | |
|
Value | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Methodology |
|
Shell Canada Data | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
($ millions, except multiple ranges and where otherwise noted) | |
TEV/2006 EBITDA
|
|
|
$1,030 mm |
|
|
|
5.5x |
|
|
|
6.5x |
|
|
|
Included |
|
|
|
Included |
|
|
$ |
5,665 |
|
|
$ |
6,695 |
|
TEV/Refining Intake Capacity
|
|
|
324,000 bbl/d |
|
|
$ |
12,000 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
|
$860 |
|
|
|
$1,345 |
|
|
$ |
4,748 |
|
|
$ |
6,205 |
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,207 |
|
|
$ |
6,450 |
|
Summary:
NAV Approach Oil Products
In the NAV approach to the Oil Products assets, we have applied
equal weighting to both the comparable companies method and the
precedent transactions method to arrive at an estimated en
bloc value for the Oil Products business unit of
approximately $6.4 billion to $8.1 billion.
Oil Products Value Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Value | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Methodology |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
Weighting | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ millions) | |
Comparable Company Analysis
|
|
$ |
7,572 |
|
|
$ |
9,844 |
|
|
|
50% |
|
|
$ |
3,786 |
|
|
$ |
4,922 |
|
Precedent Transaction Analysis
|
|
$ |
5,207 |
|
|
$ |
6,450 |
|
|
|
50% |
|
|
$ |
2,604 |
|
|
$ |
3,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
En Bloc Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,390 |
|
|
$ |
8,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Go to Market Cost Savings
Shell Canada currently has a number of initiatives underway to
reduce costs in its Oil Products business unit which should lead
to cost savings in the future. These cost savings are expected
to result from certain joint ventures, relating to streamlining
of selected distribution channels, that have been initiated by
the Company. The Go to Market cost savings
initiative was already being implemented prior to the RDS
announcement on October 23, 2006. The value of these cost
savings is not reflected in the NAV approach value for the Oil
Products business unit and therefore we have added a value for
these costs savings. We have approached the valuation of these
cost savings in two manners: (i) DCF method; and
(ii) comparable company method.
i) DCF Methodology
|
|
|
In applying this valuation technique, we calculated the present
value of the after-tax cost savings based on a financial
forecast provided by Shell Canada which assumes a growth rate of
2% per annum. Assuming a WACC of between 8.0% and 8.5%, the
present value of the Go to Market cost savings is
between $594 million and $645 million. |
ii) Comparable Companies Methodology
|
|
|
In applying this method, we derived a TEV to 2007E EBITDA
multiple which we estimated would reflect the en
bloc value of these savings. Assuming a multiple range of
between 6.9x and 7.9x (which we based primarily on Shell
Canadas trading multiples prior to the RDS announcement)
and 2007 Go to Market cost savings of |
A-22
|
|
|
$55.3 million as estimated by Shell Canada, the implied
value of the Go to Market cost savings is between
$382 million and $437 million. |
Summary:
NAV Approach Go to Market Cost
Savings
|
|
|
In the NAV approach to the Go to Market cost
savings, we have applied equal weighting to both the DCF
approach and the comparable companies method to arrive at an
estimated en bloc value for these cost savings of
approximately $488 million to $541 million. |
Unallocated Corporate Expenses
Given that our analyses of each of Shell Canadas business
units do not incorporate unallocated corporate expenses, we
adjusted our NAV approach value for these costs. We have
approached the valuation of these unallocated corporate expenses
in two manners: (i) DCF method; and (ii) comparable
companies method.
i) DCF Methodology
|
|
|
In applying this valuation technique, we calculated the present
value of the after-tax unallocated corporate costs based on a
pre-tax forecast provided to us by Shell Canada. The pre-tax
unallocated corporate costs are estimated to grow from
$55.5 million in 2007 to $95.9 million in 2016. We
have assumed a terminal growth rate of 3% thereafter. Assuming a
WACC of between 8.0% and 8.5%, the present value of the
unallocated corporate expenses is between $1.0 billion and
$1.1 billion. |
ii) Comparable Companies Methodology
|
|
|
In applying this method, we used a TEV to 2007E EBITDA en
bloc multiple comparable to that applied for the Go
to Market cost savings. Assuming a multiple range of
between 6.9x to 7.9x and 2007 unallocated costs of
$55.5 million as estimated by Shell Canada, the estimated
value of the unallocated corporate costs is between
$383 million and $438 million. |
Summary:
NAV Approach Unallocated Corporate Costs
|
|
|
In the NAV approach to the unallocated corporate costs, we have
applied equal weighting to both the comparable companies method
and the precedent transactions method to arrive at an estimated
en bloc value for these costs of approximately
$690 million to $765 million. |
Summary of NAV Analysis
Under the NAV approach, the value of each asset is summed to
produce a total asset value. The present value of the Go
to Market cost savings, as well as the proceeds from the
exercise of stock options and other employee stock incentive
plans are added to this value. The Companys net debt
(long-term debt plus working capital deficit) and an estimate of
the present value of corporate expenses that are not directly
assignable to each of the individual assets are deducted from
these values in order to arrive at an equity value per Common
Share. The results of the NAV analysis are summarized below and
indicate an equity value range of approximately $42 to $48 per
Common Share.
A-23
Summary NAV Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ millions, except per | |
|
|
Common Share data) | |
AOSP
|
|
$ |
20,102 |
|
|
$ |
21,777 |
|
Other Oil Sands
|
|
|
3,412 |
|
|
|
3,785 |
|
Exploration and Production
|
|
|
5,791 |
|
|
|
7,119 |
|
Oil Products
|
|
|
6,390 |
|
|
|
8,147 |
|
Go to Market Cost Savings
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
Frontier and Undeveloped Land
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
Unallocated Corporate G&A
|
|
|
(690 |
) |
|
|
(765 |
) |
Option
Proceeds1
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value
|
|
$ |
37,489 |
|
|
$ |
42,933 |
|
Less: Net Debt (December 31, 2006)
|
|
|
(1,911 |
) |
|
|
(1,911 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Value
|
|
$ |
35,578 |
|
|
$ |
41,022 |
|
Shares Outstanding (fully-diluted)
|
|
|
847.0 |
|
|
|
847.0 |
|
Equity Value per Common Share
|
|
$ |
42.00 |
|
|
$ |
48.43 |
|
|
|
1 |
Source: Shell Canada option schedule. |
Distinctive Material Benefits to RDS
The value of certain synergies is reflected in some of the
valuation methodologies utilized. CIBC World Markets also
considered whether any distinctive material benefits that are
unique to RDS would accrue from its acquisition of all the
Common Shares. Possible benefits or cost savings might accrue to
RDS with respect to the following areas: i) the
consolidation of the human resources and infrastructure required
for the development of the SURE Northern Energy oil sands leases
owned by RDS and the accelerated development thereof, ii) the
integration of Shell Canadas oil sands business with the
RDS downstream businesses in the United States, iii) the
elimination of certain general and administrative functions, and
iv) the opportunity to utilize consolidated tax planning
strategies. CIBC World Markets did not have sufficient financial
information or analysis from RDS to quantify such benefits but
we believe they could be material in the aggregate.
Valuation Conclusion
In arriving at an opinion of fair market value of Shell
Canadas Common Shares, CIBC World Markets has not
attributed any particular weight to any specific factor but has
made qualitative judgements based on experience in rendering
such opinions and on circumstances then prevailing as to the
significance and relevance of each factor. CIBC World
Markets did, however, weight each valuation approach differently
and ascribed the greatest amount of importance to the DCF
approach.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing and such other factors
as we considered relevant, CIBC World Markets is of the opinion
that, as of the date hereof, the fair market value is in the
range of $42 to $48 per Common Share.
Yours very truly,
A-24
SCHEDULE B
FAIRNESS OPINION OF CIBC WORLD MARKETS INC.
January 22, 2007
The Special Committee of the Board of Directors
Shell Canada Limited
400 4th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta T2P 0J4
|
|
Attention: |
Mr. Derek Burney, O.C. |
Chairman of the Special Committee
Dear Sirs:
CIBC World Markets Inc. (CIBC World Markets)
understands that Shell Investments Limited (the
Offeror), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
Royal Dutch Shell plc (RDS), proposes to make an
offer to purchase all of the common shares (the Common
Shares) of Shell Canada Limited (Shell Canada
or the Company) not already owned by the Offeror and
its affiliates for cash consideration of $45.00 per Common Share
(the Consideration) by way of takeover bid (the
Offer). CIBC World Markets also understands that
Shell Canada proposes to enter into a support agreement with the
Offeror (the Support Agreement) related to the Offer.
CIBC World Markets also understands that the Offeror and its
affiliates own approximately 78% of the outstanding Common
Shares and that the Offer would constitute an insider
bid for purposes of
Rule 61-501 of the
Ontario Securities Commission and
Regulation Q-27 of
the Quebec Autorité des marchés financiers (together
with Rule 61-501,
the Rules). In addition, CIBC World Markets
understands that the board of directors of the Company (the
Board) has appointed a committee (the Special
Committee) comprised of members of the Board who are
independent of RDS, the Offeror and Shell Canadas
management, to consider the Offer and to make recommendations to
the Board.
All dollar amounts herein are expressed in Canadian dollars,
unless stated otherwise.
Engagement of CIBC World Markets
By letter agreement dated October 28, 2006 (the
Engagement Agreement), the Special Committee
retained CIBC World Markets to assist the Special Committee in
its review of the $40 per Common Share offer originally proposed
and announced by RDS on October 23, 2006 and, in accordance
with the Rules, to prepare a formal valuation of the Common
Shares (the Valuation). CIBC World Markets has also
been asked to provide the Special Committee with an opinion (the
Opinion) as to the fairness, from a financial point
of view, of the Consideration to holders of the Common Shares
other than the Offeror and its affiliates (the Minority
Shareholders).
CIBC World Markets has delivered the Valuation, dated
January 22, 2007, to the Special Committee in a separate
letter. The Valuation is incorporated into and forms part of
this Opinion.
As described in the Valuation, CIBC World Markets will receive a
fee for providing its services under the Engagement Letter,
including the delivery of this Opinion. In addition, the Company
has agreed to reimburse CIBC World Markets for its reasonable
expenses and to indemnify it in respect of certain liabilities
that might arise out of its engagement. None of the fees payable
to us under the Engagement Agreement is contingent upon the
conclusions reached by us in the Valuation or this Opinion or
upon the completion of the Offer.
B-1
Credentials of CIBC World Markets
CIBC World Markets is one of Canadas largest investment
banking firms with operations in all facets of corporate and
government finance, mergers and acquisitions, equity and fixed
income sales and trading and investment research. The opinion
expressed herein is the opinion of CIBC World Markets and the
form and content herein have been approved for release by a
committee of CIBC World Markets managing directors and
internal counsel, each of whom is experienced in merger,
acquisition, divestiture and valuation matters.
Scope of Review
In connection with rendering this Opinion, CIBC World Markets
has reviewed and relied upon the Valuation and those items
identified in the Valuation under the heading Scope of
Review. In addition, CIBC World Markets has reviewed and
relied upon such other information, analyses, investigations and
discussions as it considered necessary or appropriate in the
circumstances. Senior officers of Shell Canada have represented
to CIBC World Markets, in a representation letter dated as of
the date hereof, as to the accuracy and completeness of the
information provided to CIBC World Markets in connection with
the Valuation and this Opinion and as to the absence of any
change in the information which would have a material effect on
the Valuation or this Opinion.
Assumptions and Limitations
The conclusion expressed in this Opinion is subject to all of
the conditions, limitations, qualifications, disclaimers and
assumptions reflected in and underlying the Valuation. The
analysis, investigations, research, testing of assumptions and
conclusions reflected in and underlying the Valuation are
integral to the provision of this Opinion.
In addition, in preparing this Opinion, we have also assumed
that the Offer will be completed substantially in accordance
with the terms of the draft Support Agreement reviewed by us and
all applicable laws, that the Offerors take-over bid
circular relating to the Offer will disclose all material facts
relating to the Offer and that the Shell Canada directors
circular will satisfy all applicable legal requirements.
We are not legal, tax or accounting experts and we express no
opinion concerning any legal, tax or accounting matters
concerning the Offer or the sufficiency of this Opinion for your
purposes.
Use of the Opinion
This Opinion is being provided to the Special Committee for its
use in considering the Offer and may not be relied upon by any
person, other than the Special Committee and the Board, or used
for any other purpose or published without the prior written
consent of CIBC World Markets. This Opinion is not to be
construed as a recommendation to any holder of Common Shares to
accept or reject the Offer.
This Opinion is given as of the date hereof and, although we
reserve the right to change or withdraw the Opinion if we learn
that any of the information that we relied upon in preparing the
Opinion was inaccurate, incomplete or misleading in any material
respect, we disclaim any obligation to change or withdraw the
Opinion, to advise any person of any change that may come to our
attention or to update the Opinion after today.
Fairness Considerations
In considering the fairness, from a financial point of view, of
the Consideration to be offered to the Minority Shareholders
pursuant to the Offer, CIBC World Markets considered and relied
upon the following:
|
|
|
|
1. |
a comparison of the Consideration to the fair market value range
of the Common Shares as determined in the Valuation; and |
|
|
2. |
a comparison of the Consideration to precedent transaction
premia and to the closing price of the Common Shares on the
Toronto Stock Exchange prior to RDS initial announcement
of its intention to make an offer to acquire the Common Shares
held by Minority Shareholders. |
CIBC World Markets reviewed premia paid in the following
transactions that it considered may be relevant for the purpose
of its analyses:
|
|
|
|
i) |
30 Canadian-based transactions with an equity value of greater
than $100 million involving the acquisition by a
controlling shareholder(s) of a publicly traded minority
interest since January 1997 (Minority Bid
Precedents); |
B-2
|
|
|
|
ii) |
22 Canadian-based transactions with a deal value of greater than
$2 billion completed since January 2001 (Large
Canadian Precedents); and |
|
|
iii) |
10 oil and gas industry transactions with a deal value of
greater than $1 billion completed since January 1999
(Oil and Gas Precedents). |
The 1-day premium for this purpose is defined as the amount by
which the value per share offered under the relevant transaction
exceeded the closing price of the shares on the day immediately
prior to announcement of the transaction and the 30-day premium
is defined as the amount by which the value per share offered
exceeded the closing price of the shares on 30 calendar days
prior to the announcement of the transaction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted | |
|
|
|
|
Highest | |
|
Lowest | |
|
Mean | |
|
Mean1 | |
|
Median | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Minority Bid Precedents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-Day
|
|
|
56.3% |
|
|
|
1.6% |
|
|
|
23.3% |
|
|
|
19.8% |
|
|
|
22.7% |
|
|
30-Day
|
|
|
83.8% |
|
|
|
1.4% |
|
|
|
32.2% |
|
|
|
30.7% |
|
|
|
31.5% |
|
Large Canadian
Precedents2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-Day
|
|
|
102.8% |
|
|
|
(13.5 |
)% |
|
|
26.9% |
|
|
|
24.3% |
|
|
|
22.7% |
|
|
30-Day
|
|
|
116.6% |
|
|
|
(4.6 |
)% |
|
|
33.9% |
|
|
|
29.5% |
|
|
|
31.3% |
|
Oil and Gas
Precedents3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-Day
|
|
|
64.9% |
|
|
|
10.1% |
|
|
|
33.5% |
|
|
|
29.7% |
|
|
|
32.5% |
|
|
30-Day
|
|
|
90.7% |
|
|
|
18.8% |
|
|
|
47.2% |
|
|
|
45.2% |
|
|
|
41.2% |
|
|
|
1 |
Adjusted mean excludes values more than one standard deviation
from the mean. |
|
2 |
Excludes mergers-of-equals. |
|
3 |
Excludes mergers-of-equals and oil sands transactions. |
The range of premia paid in the above transactions is very wide.
Although every transaction has its own particular circumstances,
we believe that the 62 transactions reviewed, in aggregate,
provide a useful comparison benchmark.
The Consideration represents a premium of 37.2% over the TSX
closing price per Common Share on October 20, 2006, the
last trading day prior to RDS announcement of its
intention to make an offer for the Common Shares and a premium
of 45.4% over the TSX closing price per Common Share on
September 22, 2006, the trading day 30 calendar days prior
to such announcement.
Conclusion
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, CIBC World Markets is
of the opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Consideration to
be offered under the Offer is fair, from a financial point of
view, to the Minority Shareholders.
Yours very truly,
B-3
exv99wxfy
Exhibit (f)
Canada Business Corporations Act
R.S.C. 1985, Chap. C-44
PART XVII
COMPULSORY AND COMPELLED ACQUISITIONS
[2001, c. 14, s. 98]
Definitions s. 206
206. (1) The definitions in this subsection apply in this Part.
dissenting offeree
dissenting offeree means, where a take-over bid is made for all the shares of a class of
shares, a holder of a share of that class who does not accept the take-over bid and
includes a subsequent holder of that share who acquires it from the first mentioned holder;
offer
offer includes an invitation to make an offer; shell@07
offeree
offeree means a person to whom a take-over bid is made;
offeree corporation
offeree corporation means a distributing corporation whose shares are the object of a
take-over bid;
offeror
offeror means a person, other than an agent, who makes a take-over bid, and includes two or
more persons who, directly or indirectly,
(a) make take-over
bids jointly or in concert; or
(b) intend to exercise jointly or in concert voting rights attached to shares for which a
take-over bid is made;
share
share means a share, with or without voting rights, and includes
(a) a security currently convertible into such a share; and
(b) currently exercisable options and rights to acquire such a share or such a convertible
security;
take-over bid
take-over bid means an offer made by an offeror to shareholders of a distributing corporation
at approximately the same time to acquire all of the shares of a class of issued shares,
and includes an offer made by a distributing corporation to repurchase all of the shares of
a class of its shares.
Right to acquire s. 206(2)
(2) If within one hundred and twenty days after the date of a take-over bid the bid is accepted
by the holders of not less than ninety per cent of the shares of any class of shares to which
the take-over bid relates, other than shares held at the date of the take-over bid by or on
behalf of the offeror or an affiliate or associate of the offeror, the offeror is entitled, on
complying with this section, to acquire the shares held by the dissenting offerees.
- 2 -
Notice s. 206(3)
(3) An offeror may acquire shares held by a dissenting offeree by sending by registered mail
within sixty days after the date of termination of the take-over bid and in any event within one
hundred and eighty days after the date of the take-over bid, an offerors notice to each
dissenting offeree and to the Director stating that
(a) the offerees holding not less than ninety per cent of the shares to which the bid
relates accepted the take-over bid;
(b) the offeror is bound to take up and pay for or has taken up and paid for the shares
of the offerees who accepted the take-over bid;
(c) a dissenting offeree is required to elect
(i) to transfer their shares to the offeror on the terms on which the offeror acquired
the shares of the offerees who accepted the take-over bid, or
(ii) to demand payment of the fair value of the shares in accordance with subsections
(9) to (18) by notifying the offeror within twenty days after receiving the offerors
notice;
(d) a dissenting offeree who does not notify the offeror in accordance with subparagraph
(5)(b)(ii) is deemed to have elected to transfer the shares to the offeror on the same
terms that the offeror acquired the shares from the offerees who accepted the take-over
bid; and
(e) a dissenting offeree must send their shares to which the take-over bid relates to the
offeree corporation within twenty days after receiving the offerors notice.
Notice of adverse claim s. 206(4)
(4) Concurrently with sending the offerors notice under subsection (3), the offeror shall send
to the offeree corporation a notice of adverse claim in accordance with section 78 with respect
to each share held by a dissenting offeree.
Share certificate s. 206(5)
(5) A dissenting offeree to whom an offerors notice is sent under subsection (3) shall, within
twenty days after receiving the notice,
(a) send the share certificates of the class of shares to which the take-over bid relates
to the offeree corporation; and
(b) elect
(i) to transfer the shares to the offeror on the terms on which the offeror acquired
the shares of the offerees who accepted the take-over bid, or
(ii) to demand payment of the fair value of the shares in accordance with subsections
(9) to (18) by notifying the offeror within those twenty days.
Deemed election s. 206(5.1)
(5.1) A dissenting offeree who does not notify the offeror in accordance with subparagraph
(5)(b)(ii) is deemed to have elected to transfer the shares to the offeror on the same terms on
which the offeror acquired the shares from the offerees who accepted the take-over bid.
Payment s. 206(6)
(6) Within twenty days after the offeror sends an offerors notice under subsection (3), the
offeror shall pay or transfer to the offeree corporation the amount of money or other
consideration that the offeror
- 3 -
would have had to pay or transfer to a dissenting offeree if the dissenting offeree had elected
to accept the take-over bid under subparagraph (5)(b)(i).
Consideration s. 206(7)
(7) The offeree corporation is deemed to hold in trust for the dissenting shareholders the money
or other consideration it receives under subsection (6), and the offeree corporation shall
deposit the money in a separate account in a bank or other body corporate any of whose deposits
are insured by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation or guaranteed by the Quebec Deposit
Insurance Board, and shall place the other consideration in the custody of a bank or such other
body corporate.
When corporation is offeror s. 206(7.1)
(7.1) A corporation that is an offeror making a take-over bid to repurchase all of the shares of
a class of its shares is deemed to hold in trust for the dissenting shareholders the money and
other consideration that it would have had to pay or transfer to a dissenting offeree if the
dissenting offeree had elected to accept the take-over bid under subparagraph (5)(b)(i), and the
corporation shall, within twenty days after a notice is sent under subsection (3), deposit the
money in a separate account in a bank or other body corporate any of whose deposits are insured
by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation or guaranteed by the Quebec Deposit Insurance Board,
and shall place the other consideration in the custody of a bank or such other body corporate.
Duty of offeree corporation s. 206(8)
(8) Within thirty days after the offeror sends a notice under subsection (3), the offeree
corporation shall
(a) if the payment or transfer required by subsection (6) is made, issue to the offeror a
share certificate in respect of the shares that were held by dissenting offerees;
(b) give to each dissenting offeree who elects to accept the take-over bid terms under
subparagraph (5)(b)(i) and who sends share certificates as required by paragraph (5)(a)
the money or other consideration to which the offeree is entitled, disregarding
fractional shares, which may be paid for in money; and
(c) if the payment or transfer required by subsection (6) is made and the money or other
consideration is deposited as required by subsection (7) or (7.1), send to each
dissenting shareholder who has not sent share certificates as required by paragraph
(5)(a) a notice stating that
(i) the dissenting shareholders shares have been cancelled,
(ii) the offeree corporation or some designated person holds in trust for the
dissenting shareholder the money or other consideration to which that shareholder is
entitled as payment for or in exchange for the shares, and
(iii) the offeree corporation will, subject to subsections (9) to (18), send that
money or other consideration to that shareholder without delay after receiving the shares.
Application to court s. 206(9)
(9) If a dissenting offeree has elected to demand payment of the fair value of the shares under
subparagraph (5)(b)(ii), the offeror may, within twenty days after it has paid the money or
transferred the other consideration under subsection (6), apply to a court to fix the fair value
of the shares of that dissenting offeree.
- 4 -
Idem s. 206(10)
(10) If an offeror fails to apply to a court under subsection (9), a dissenting offeree may
apply to a court for the same purpose within a further period of twenty days.
Status of dissenter if no court application s. 206(11)
(11) Where no application is made to a court under subsection (10) within the period set out in
that subsection, a dissenting offeree is deemed to have elected to transfer their shares to the
offeror on the same terms that the offeror acquired the shares from the offerees who accepted
the take-over bid.
Venue s. 206(12)
(12) An application under subsection (9) or (10) shall be made to a court having jurisdiction in
the place where the corporation has its registered office or in the province where the
dissenting offeree resides if the corporation carries on business in that province.
No security for costs s. 206(13)
(13) A dissenting offeree is not required to give security for costs in an application made
under subsection (9) or (10).
Parties s. 206(14)
(14) On an application under subsection (9) or (10)
(a) all dissenting offerees referred to in subparagraph (5)(b)(ii) whose shares have not
been acquired by the offeror shall be joined as parties and are bound by the decision of
the court; and
(b) the offeror shall notify each affected dissenting offeree of the date, place and
consequences of the application and of their right to appear and be heard in person or by
counsel.
Powers of court s. 206(15)
(15) On an application to a court under subsection (9) or (10), the court may determine whether
any other person is a dissenting offeree who should be joined as a party, and the court shall
then fix a fair value for the shares of all dissenting offerees.
Appraisers s. 206(16)
(16) A court may in its discretion appoint one or more appraisers to assist the court to fix a
fair value for the shares of a dissenting offeree.
Final order s. 206(17)
(17) The final order of the court shall be made against the offeror in favour of each dissenting
offeree and for the amount for the shares as fixed by the court.
Additional powers s. 206(18)
(18) In connection with proceedings under this section, a court may make any order it thinks fit
and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, it may
(a) fix the amount of money or other consideration that is required to be held in trust
under subsection (7) or (7.1);
(b) order that that money or other consideration be held in trust by a person other than
the offeree corporation;
(c) allow a reasonable rate of interest on the amount payable to each dissenting offeree
from the date they send or deliver their share certificates under subsection (5) until
the date of payment; and
- 5 -
(d) order that any money payable to a shareholder who cannot be found be paid to the
Receiver General and subsection 227(3) applies in respect thereof.
Obligation to acquire shares s. 206.1
206.1 (1) If a shareholder holding shares of a distributing corporation does not receive an
offerors notice under subsection 206(3), the shareholder may
(a) within ninety days after the date of termination of the take-over bid, or
(b) if the shareholder did not receive an offer pursuant to the take-over bid, within
ninety days after the later of
(i) the date of termination of the take-over bid, and
(ii) the date on which the shareholder learned of the take-over bid,
require the offeror to acquire those shares.
Conditions s. 206.1(2)
(2) If a shareholder requires the offeror to acquire shares under subsection (1), the offeror
shall acquire the shares on the same terms under which the offeror acquired or will acquire the shares of the offerees who accepted the take-over bid.